Re: [asterisk-users] * 1.4 - 1.6, zaptel - dahdi
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:56:38AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote: This has got to be an FAQ, so if someone can point me to where it is answered, I would be greatly appreciated. The documentation for all this stuff is scattered and (to me at least) either very sketchy or hard to find. What I want is a guide for how to convert from 1.4 with zaptel to 1.6 with dahdi. All the recent kernel vulnerabilities are forcing me to upgrade my home server from no-longer-supported Fedora 8 up to Fedora 11, and that means upgrading asterisk as well. It appears that, although the dahdi-tools package is part of Fedora 11, the kernel modules are not. I couldn't get the dahdi tools such as dahdi_scan to work at all until I installed the dahdi-kmdl package from ATrpms. Does that match others' experiences? I just finished a transition from the old ATrpms setup for asterisk to a new one that allows you to use asterisk 1.4 on F11 w/o fear of asterisk 1.6 overwriting it. It's not what I recommend, one should try to move to 1.6, but upgrading both the underlying OS and the asterisk/dahdi/zaptel framework can be seperated that way. For RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux there will even be asterisk12/zaptel12 support, and there are shiny new 1.6 packages there as well. ATM there are no userland bits to download at ATrpms at all, as I'm trying to move the fax application out of the asterisk14 rpm to using agx-ast-addons instead, but I'll release the packages and make an announcement about it soon. If you feel like a guinea pig, you can contact me off list or on ATrpms-devel to help testing. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgprtg6dNWTCg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] * 1.4 - 1.6, zaptel - dahdi
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:48:22PM -0600, Greg Woods wrote: This appears to be somewhat inconsistent in your determination to update to 1.6. Are packages for 1.4 available for F11? Well, Axel did just say that he might be providing some through ATrpms, so that is a possibility. Actually there already were asterisk-1.4.25.1 F11 packages at ATrpms until last week http://www.google.com/search?q=asterisk-1.4.25.1-78.fc11 (same for addons, sounds etc.) but since we wanted to make asterisk-1.6 a first class citizen these packages needed to be renamed to asterisk14 to not be automatically overridden. So the new packages have been renamed to asterisk14-1.4.26.1-84, asterisk-addons14-1.4.9-24, asterisk14-app_ldap-2.0rc1-5 and the sounds packages have been made 1.4/1.6 compatible. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpAGqlhb6Z6Q.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] New CentOS 5 repo: dahdi, asterisk, freepbx RPMs
Hi, On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:18:12AM -0500, Jason Parker wrote: How about merging in your changes/improvements/new packages with ATrpms (and automatically later into rpmrepo.org Of course I'd love to contribute my changes to ATrpms. Some of the small changes I made, such as adding OSLEC to the DAHDI RPMs, might be nice for ATrpms users. I'll whip up some patches against the ATrpms sources. Alternatively, there's also the RPMS at http://packages.asterisk.org/centos/ which seem to have a nice spread of options available, I would love it if some of this were to happen. I am very familiar with Axel and ATrpms - he has proven countless times that he knows what he's doing when it comes to this sort of thing. Getting help/advice from somebody like him would be extremely beneficial. As far as basing the ATrpms (or others) packages on the AsteriskNOW packages, if that is something that Axel (or others) wanted to do, I would be more than willing to help with whatever is needed. The packages at ATrpms try to be as upstream/vanilla/generic as possible, I wouldn't want to base them on a downstream project like AsteriskNOW (I even try to keep any RHEL/Fedora specifics out of them, so people can even rebuild on other rpm platforms). As you wrote in a trimmed part of the mail, for example relying on the downstream of AsteriskNOW resulted in forgetting setting up init files needed for standalone operation. But serving a downstream project is a different beast and worthwhile doing it. Are there any bits in the ATrpms packages that need adjustment/fixing wrt AsteriskNOW? If so is it possible to keep the packages still generic, and FHS/LSB compliant? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpLO1NxnR65j.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] New CentOS 5 repo: dahdi, asterisk, freepbx RPMs
Hi, On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:35:32PM +0800, John Morris wrote: Hi, Axel. Axel Thimm wrote: How about merging in your changes/improvements/new packages with ATrpms (and automatically later into rpmrepo.org)? That way we won't have further fragmentation and a larger user base to test bits (which will be distributed in stable, testing etc repos). Of course I'd love to contribute my changes to ATrpms. Some of the small changes I made, such as adding OSLEC to the DAHDI RPMs, might be nice for ATrpms users. I'll whip up some patches against the ATrpms sources. My problem with ATrpms, though, is that the RPMs make use of many custom macros that make them unbuildable outside the ATrpms environment. I understand that might be necessary for RPMs like DAHDI that build kernel modules for several versions of several distros, where vanilla specfile code would get hairy. (I think we had this discussion a couple of years ago on the ATrpms ML.) Since I don't have to worry about multiple versions of multiple distros in my environment, I prefer to use vanilla specfile that will rebuild on anyone's CentOS 5 system. Actually all you need these days is to install atrpms-rpm-config. This will provide all that may be neccessary. The most prominent part of the environment is to support multiple kernels, not mulitple distros. Of course using distro-neutral macros helps keeping the same specfile/src.rpm across the distros. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgp94Mbri3a9I.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] New CentOS 5 repo: dahdi, asterisk, freepbx RPMs
Hi John, On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:35:45AM +0800, John Morris wrote: I've set up an RPM repository with several asterisk-related RPMs that I think contain some improvements upon what are already out there. [...] I'm quite interested to get feedback on these RPMs, both on the need for such a repo as well as (if there actually is a need) problems and improvements that can be made. I'll be monitoring this thread as well as comments in the blog announcements (links below). How about merging in your changes/improvements/new packages with ATrpms (and automatically later into rpmrepo.org)? That way we won't have further fragmentation and a larger user base to test bits (which will be distributed in stable, testing etc repos). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgp2afpunO1si.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with building dahdi-linux RPM
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 01:04:47PM +0300, bee-beeep wrote: I have some OpenVOX A1200p cards, and driver for them so far works only with dahdi-2.0.0 Sorry, looks like i don't understand, how to correctly rebuild driver: rpmbuild --rebuild http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dahdi-linux-2.1.0.3-59.src.rpm skipped Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/dahdi-linux-kmdl-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5-2.1.0.3-59.RHL5.i386.rpm Only kmdl module was wroten, no dahdi-linux and dahdi-linux-devel. Can you explain, what should i do? :-) Use the packages at http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/dahdi-tools/ in addition to the kmdl you built. Unless you also need a specific older dahdi-tools packafe, which you would have to rebuild, too. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgp95mZaLW0RD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Problem with building dahdi-linux RPM
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 06:50:26PM +0300, bee-beeep wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/dahdi-linux-kmdl-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5-2.0.0-56.RHL5.i386.rpm As you can see, it builds me only kmdl rpm - i wonder this is kernel module, like zaptel-modules. So, if I'm trying to install dahdi-tools rpm, installation fails with error: Failed dependencies: dahdi-linux = 2.0.0-57.RHL5. How can I force rpmbuild to create userspace part of dahdi-linux too, no only kernel modules? Why don't you use dahdi-tools from http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/dahdi-tools/ -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpLPgxH1pbSt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] zaptel 1.4/1.2 on RHEL3 (wa s: Zaptel won´t recognizes sources installed)
Hi, On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:53:59AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: Specifically one of the many RPM packages Axel Thimm maintains is Zaptel, and is also vs. RHEL3: http://atrpms.net/dist/el3/zaptel/ . He reported several breakages in the past (which were fixed). I see that the latest version there is 1.4.11 . Actually it's just 1.4.7.1. :( Newer zaptels break on RHEL3 with (1.4.11) In file included from base.c:46: vpm450m.h:27:28: linux/firmware.h: No such file or directory In file included from base.c:46: vpm450m.h:36: warning: `struct firmware' declared inside parameter list vpm450m.h:36: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want base.c: In function `t4_shutdown': base.c:1418: warning: implicit declaration of function `msleep' base.c: In function `t4_interrupt_gen2': base.c:2916: warning: implicit declaration of function `IRQ_RETVAL' base.c:2916: warning: `return' with a value, in function returning void base.c: In function `t4_vpm450_init': base.c:3121: storage size of `embedded_firmware' isn't known base.c:3200: warning: passing arg 4 of `init_vpm450m' from incompatible pointer type base.c:3203: warning: implicit declaration of function `release_firmware' base.c:3121: warning: unused variable `embedded_firmware' (1.2.26) zaptel-base.c: In function `calc_fcs': zaptel-base.c:734: `fcstab' undeclared (first use in this function) zaptel-base.c:734: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once zaptel-base.c:734: for each function it appears in.) zaptel-base.c: In function `__zt_putbuf_chunk': zaptel-base.c:6003: `fcstab' undeclared (first use in this function) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpYDenkUGEi2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Fritz! Card/CAPI Help.
Hi, On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 05:58:50PM +0100, Jaap Winius wrote: Quoting Razza [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I installed the drivers/kernel drivers from ATrpms ( http://dl.atrpms.net/all/fcpci-03.11.07-14.fc8.i386.rpm and ... ). It seems you're in luck to some degree. I downloaded these files and examined the links within, but they simply point back to the AVM site that still offers the old driver versions. I guess your versions are a hack. There are patches inside that will work on Debian as well, just get the src.rpm and pick out the patches. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpNwIgkUqIKc.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] BLF trouble
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:57:02PM +0100, Lars Bensmann wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote: It isn't how Asterisk 1.2 behaved. Can you reproduce on a vanilla 1.4? This is also not on a vanilla 1.4. It's the BRIstuffed version from the xorcom archive. I can see if I can install a vanilla 1.4 off-hours and just test the SIP-phones. Although I don't know when I will be able to do so. I have the same problem, but the only 1.4's we have in production are from atrpms.org, so they have various patches applied. We are in the process of migrating to the ones provided in Fedora, and when that is done I can check for myself. Do you use the BRIstuff version? On ATrpms there is no bristuff patched in in 1.4.x. Is there anybody who has the hints working for outgoing calls? The problem is most annoying. I know. Lars -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpwsBGOdG0Mq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] BLF trouble
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:08:59PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote: Lars Bensmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anybody have an idea where I can start looking to fix this? Or is this regular behaviour of asterisk that it does not show an extension as busy when it initiated the call? It isn't how Asterisk 1.2 behaved. Can you reproduce on a vanilla 1.4? I have the same problem, but the only 1.4's we have in production are from atrpms.org, so they have various patches applied. The patch is mainly just for spandsp support - ATrpms' packaging of asterisk is following rather upstream closely. We are in the process of migrating to the ones provided in Fedora, and when that is done I can check for myself. Although it's unlikely that this would change anything, please let me know in case it really does, thanks! The problem is most annoying. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpqXnvi5QkyZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Upgrade to Asterisk 1.4 - it's one year's old!
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:40:32PM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote: Olle E Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But on the other hand, if people rely on third-party distributions we might want to set up some kind of peer pressure on the maintainers - and possibly identify them so we can support them and speed up their process. Third-party distributions are very important, and Asterisk has for various reasons done relatively badly there. Fedora still doesn't have Asterisk, but does have CallWeaver. Asterisk isn't even available in the most popular extra repositories, but only in ATrpms, my least favourite of the larger repositories. It happens to be my favourite thrid party repo though, ;) and indeed there is quite some asterisk support happening there. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpxYdtxsy9Yh.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Kernel Panic in wct4xxp during unload on Zaptel-1.4.4
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:07:19AM -0400, James FitzGibbon wrote:
I attempted an upgrade of our production system from Asterisk/Zaptel 1.2 to
1.4 this weekend. Intially everything looked like it was working properly,
but some time in the day following the upgrade, the system died to a kernel
panic. I wasn't able to catch the entire kernel dump on the console
unfortunately.
I attempted to isolate the panic, and found that when 'service zaptel stop'
was run (specifically, when wct4xxp was unloaded) I get this panic
consistently:
5 Not prepped yet! (repeated approx 250 times)
5 Freed a Wildcard
5 Not prepped yet! (repeated approx 550 times)
5 Stopped TE4XXP, Turned off DMA
5 Not prepped yet! (repeated approx 11000 times)
5 Unable to handle kernel paging request at ff034010 RIP:
5 a0163207{:wct4xxp:t4_interrupt_gen2+63}
5 PML4 4ea063 PGD 1388067 PMD 1389067 PTE 0
5 Oops: [1] SMP
5 CPU 1
5 Modules linked in: zttranscode(U) wct4xxp(U) zaptel(U) crc_ccitt
netconsole md5 ipv6 dm_mirror dm_mod button battery ac joydev ehci_hcd
uhci_hcd hw_random bnx2 ext3 jbd
cciss sd_mod scsi_mod
5 Pid: 11053, comm: hotplug Not tainted 2.6.9-42.0.8.ELsmp
5 RIP: 0010:[a0163207]
a0163207{:wct4xxp:t4_interrupt_gen2+63}
5 RSP: :0100013ebdb0 EFLAGS: 00010046
5 RAX: ff034000 RBX: 010073478724 RCX: 0002
5 RDX: 010073478680 RSI: 0002 RDI: 010073478724
5 RBP: 010073478680 R08: 0008 R09:
5 R10: R11: 0002 R12: 00d1
5 R13: 0100013ebec8 R14: 0100013ebec8 R15: 010075e94978
5 FS: 002a955643e0() GS:804e5900()
knlGS:
5 CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b
5 CR2: ff034010 CR3: 013d8000 CR4: 06e0
5 Process hotplug (pid: 11053, threadinfo 01007413c000, task
01007c445030)
5 Stack: 00d1 01007413dc98 80138552
0038
50100013ebea8 0100013ebde8 0001
00d1
50012 010073478680
5 Call Trace:IRQ 80138552{printk+141}
80112f4a{handle_IRQ_event+41}
5801131c4{do_IRQ+197}
80110833{ret_from_intr+0}
58013c731{__do_softirq+77}
8013c7e5{do_softirq+49}
580110bf5{apic_timer_interrupt+133} EOI
8011c21a{flush_tlb_page+44}
580169106{do_wp_page+1127}
80123ed3{do_page_fault+575}
580169ff2{handle_mm_fault+1228}
80123e9a{do_page_fault+518}
58011026a{system_call+126}
80132bc6{schedule_tail+202}
580110d91{error_exit+0}
5
5 Code: 8b 40 10 89 44 24 58 e8 3d 80 1a e0 31 c0 f6 44 24 58 07 0f
5 RIP a0163207{:wct4xxp:t4_interrupt_gen2+63} RSP
0100013ebdb0
5 CR2: ff034010
5 0Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops
5 Badness in panic at kernel/panic.c:118
5
5 Call Trace:IRQ 80137a8a{panic+527}
80110bf5{apic_timer_interrupt+133}
580111aec{oops_end+38} 80111b07{oops_end+65}
580124148{do_page_fault+1204}
a0078f51{:bnx2:bnx2_start_xmit+470}
5802bb4cd{netpoll_send_skb+257}
80110d91{error_exit+0}
5a0163207{:wct4xxp:t4_interrupt_gen2+63}
80138552{printk+141}
580112f4a{handle_IRQ_event+41}
801131c4{do_IRQ+197}
580110833{ret_from_intr+0}
8013c731{__do_softirq+77}
58013c7e5{do_softirq+49}
80110bf5{apic_timer_interrupt+133}
5 EOI 8011c21a{flush_tlb_page+44}
80169106{do_wp_page+1127}
580123ed3{do_page_fault+575}
80169ff2{handle_mm_fault+1228}
580123e9a{do_page_fault+518}
8011026a{system_call+126}
580132bc6{schedule_tail+202}
80110d91{error_exit+0}
5
5 Badness in i8042_panic_blink at drivers/input/serio/i8042.c:987
5
5 Call Trace:IRQ 8024219b{i8042_panic_blink+238}
80137a38{panic+445}
580110bf5{apic_timer_interrupt+133}
80111aec{oops_end+38}
580111b07{oops_end+65}
80124148{do_page_fault+1204}
5a0078f51{:bnx2:bnx2_start_xmit+470}
802bb4cd{netpoll_send_skb+257}
580110d91{error_exit+0}
a0163207{:wct4xxp:t4_interrupt_gen2+63}
580138552{printk+141}
80112f4a{handle_IRQ_event+41}
5801131c4{do_IRQ+197}
80110833{ret_from_intr+0}
58013c731{__do_softirq+77}
8013c7e5{do_softirq+49}
580110bf5{apic_timer_interrupt+133} EOI
8011c21a{flush_tlb_page+44}
580169106{do_wp_page+1127}
80123ed3{do_page_fault+575}
580169ff2{handle_mm_fault+1228}
[asterisk-users] Re: compile error on RHEL5 or CENTOS5
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:47:15PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: I am getting the following compile error on centos 5. Any suggestions? Jerry I can't tell you waht went wrong in your build, but there are apckages of zaptel available at http://atrpms.net/dist/el5/zaptel/ CC [M] /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.o /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c: In function ‘debugfs_open’: /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c:171: error: ‘struct inode’ has no member named ‘u’ /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c: In function ‘proc_xbus_command_write’: /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c:1108: warning: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but argument 6 has type ‘long int’ /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c:1118: warning: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int’, but argument 6 has type ‘long int’ make[4]: *** [/usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp] Error 2 make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-8.1.1.el5-x86_64' make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.4.1]# -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgp3b2XRun5IK.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: ZAP device reference in Zaptel 1.4
Hi, On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:48:08PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:11:01AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 04:59:41PM +1000, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: monk*CLI zap show channels No such command 'zap show' (type 'help' for help) Does that mean I dont have ZAP support in Asterisk? Maybe. ls -l /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so I also repeat my second question: What is the contents of /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf ? Follow-up: The issue seems to be an issue with the atrpms package: http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1165 Asterisk 1.4.2 is missing chan_zap.so Thanks to Tzafrir, Mark, Eric and other the bug was identified and sqashed (it was a wrong build order that had asterisk 1.4.2 build against zaptel 1.4.0 instead of 1.4.1). Updated packages are on their way (1.4.2-37) to the master repo, so please yum update to get chan_zap support back. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpjUXqFq57Ke.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: build rpm fails
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:59:10AM +0100, Tomislav Parcina wrote: Tomislav Parcina wrote: They don't have 1.2.x version there? Newer mind, I found it :) How fast do they make package since source version is out? This question still stands. As fast as they read asterisk-announce ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpkcoggk14kl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: build rpm fails
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:55:57PM +1100, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: Hi Axel, Everything installed and working well. Thanks very much. Quick question, do you have MySQL support compiled into the rpms? Yes, but not in these rpm, due to mysql's GPL licensing, read /usr/share/doc/asterisk-1.4.0/mysql.txt for details. Just install asterisk-addons for mysql. The packaging follow the same licensing split like upstream. On 3/2/07, Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:05:54AM +1100, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to get Asterisk 1.4 running on CentOS 4.4 (Kernel 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp) and am having a lot of trouble getting asterisk running on it. I had a fair bit of success with the ATrpms binaries (Zaptel worked but asterisk failed to startup because it couldn't find the speex modules). Get it from here: http://atrpms.net/dist/el4/speex/, or since your using a yum based distribution, point yum to atrpms and let it do the work. I am trying to thus recompile the asterisk rpm for CentOS 4.4 with the least amounts of external dependencies. Well, you'll probably find out at the end that you need to upgrade speex to the version above. make rpm gives me an error saying astman could not be found. How do I build astman? Has anyone succeeded making rpm on CentOS? The above rpms are effectively on CentOS: They were built on RHEL, but CentOS is a clone from RHEL. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpSxtg5Gpcf0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: build rpm fails
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:05:54AM +1100, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to get Asterisk 1.4 running on CentOS 4.4 (Kernel 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp) and am having a lot of trouble getting asterisk running on it. I had a fair bit of success with the ATrpms binaries (Zaptel worked but asterisk failed to startup because it couldn't find the speex modules). Get it from here: http://atrpms.net/dist/el4/speex/, or since your using a yum based distribution, point yum to atrpms and let it do the work. I am trying to thus recompile the asterisk rpm for CentOS 4.4 with the least amounts of external dependencies. Well, you'll probably find out at the end that you need to upgrade speex to the version above. make rpm gives me an error saying astman could not be found. How do I build astman? Has anyone succeeded making rpm on CentOS? The above rpms are effectively on CentOS: They were built on RHEL, but CentOS is a clone from RHEL. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpn5JFoRK0i9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:47:18AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: bristuff is the only patch in functionality, and for 1.2.15 I need to drop it again, because it does not apply Gee, it shows you're not on the bristuff list. Up-to-date bristuff patch for Asterisk: Not only am I not on this list, I didn't know of its existance until now, and I seem to be too dump to google it up. Can you provide a URL for the list? Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpHttOVJg7FV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] endless story of bristuff patching (was: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64)
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:29:47AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: bristuff is the only patch in functionality, and for 1.2.15 I need to drop it again, because it does not apply Gee, it shows you're not on the bristuff list. OK, I'm on it, but it seems like it exists less than two weeks. Up-to-date bristuff patch for Asterisk: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-voip/asterisk/trunk/debian/patches/bristuff.dpatch?op=filerev=0sc=0 Is there a way to extract this patch w/o html markup like nbsp;? BTW: the one for Zaptel: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-voip/zaptel/trunk/debian/patches/bristuff.dpatch?op=filerev=0sc=0 and there is no upstream equivalent (why isn't bristuff merged in?). Ask Kapejod. You mean you don't know, and I should ask the author, or you know and it's a delicate subject, so you better not answer? ;) But I don't think bristuff should have done you any harm. bristuff has many changes to the ISDN stack. Some may disapprove of them. It is considered as better in many accounts. The chan_capi included in bristuff is probably not as good as chan_capi-cm from sourceforge. In Debian we simply delete all the capi modules from the bristuff version. chan_api is rather external to asterisk, I'm more concerned about core feature patching resulting in different ABI/API like function calls in libpri/zaptel. Can't at least these bits be merged into asteriks upstream? Anything else can even be built external to the main asterisk build, e.g. against an asterisk-devel package. I'm just tired of every asterisk update breaking bristuff. Users want bristuff for one reason or another, and I can't stall an asterisk update until the next bnristuff update adjusts to the latest asterisk release. To me it looks like politics - cold war of different approaches. :/ There are also a number of nice small applications, and a bunch of fixes (e.g: related to snom phones). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpRXr5V7Nin8.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:01:35AM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote: I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel versions. If you want to save these hassles, why not use the packages bits that are available for FC5/FC6/RHEL4/RHEL3 i386/x86_64/ppc? There are even packages for the upcoming F7 and RHEL5 available: http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk/ http://atrpms.net/name/zaptel/ If you add atrpms to your yum config all you have to do is yum install asterisk zaptel zaptel-kmdl-`uname -r` If you want yum to automatically install new kmdls for new kernels also install yum-plugin-kmdl, and then you only need to use yum update and not worry again (or worry less ...). I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy. I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but doesn't work. I'm running make linux26, make install. Also, I have the kernel sources, and a symlink to /lib/modules/ Also, I tried the make install-udev, since there was no zap device on /dev/zap but nothing. The error is that when I run modprobe the result is FATAL NO ZAPTEL MODULE FOUND. Any clue about this? Thanks Carlos Alperin -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgprRIZT5q7Rf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:52:22AM +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21 Feb 2007, at 23:06, Axel Thimm wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:01:35AM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote: I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel versions. If you want to save these hassles, why not use the packages bits that are available for FC5/FC6/RHEL4/RHEL3 i386/x86_64/ppc? There are even packages for the upcoming F7 and RHEL5 available: Hi Axel, I tried to use the 1.2.x RPMs and they would not work for me attempting to use them with an Eicon Diva Server card and Melware's chan_capi. Only by looking at the SRPM did I notice that they are patched with BRIStuff patches, which I have assume causes incompatibilities. Compiling Asterisk and Zaptel from sources again solved all my problems. It may be helpful to spell out more clearly how severaly patched the Asterisk in those RPMs is. bristuff is the only patch in functionality, and for 1.2.15 I need to drop it again, because it does not apply and there is no upstream equivalent (why isn't bristuff merged in?). But I don't think bristuff should have done you any harm. But anything that should be tunable is in the sense that if you really think asterisk should be build w/o bristuff you get the src.rpm and do a rpmbuild --rebuild --without bristuff asterisk-xyz.src.rpm It would be worth while to try to stick to the packages either simply using them, or building from them, or modify them, as if there are any issues they can be ironed out, which then benefits more users. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpPcWeLbOdEj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64
BTW Carlos, all your posts are with Importance: High in this thread. On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 08:35:12PM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote: Axel, Thanks for your advice, but as I tried to found the real problem overpass the search is just like close my eyes. Not really what I was suggesting, see below. I'm trying to learn in order to not repeat same mistake twice. I don't know how the rpm's are build, and I don't think that You can apply on every kind of variation you can find. Also, there are additional functions I going to add, that are directly related To the full system, so I cannot drive this on blind packages. Thanks a lot, but I'm going to search for the solution and find what mistake I made. Packages, either rpms, debs, ebuilds or any other technology allow you not only to blindly use them, but in fact you can rebuild them, modify them source-wise at will or simply be reviewed for seeing how to build something. A src.rpm is a collection of source, patches and a specfile which is more or less a recipe on how to build and install the sources/patches. So if you want to go the build-from-scratch route, you can look at how the packages were built, and either manually repeat the steps or letting rpmbuild do that for you. And if you need modifications you can do that at package level, too, a patch usually takes two lines to be added. Finally if your modifications could be generally useful you can submit the changes back for the next package update to cover them. Carlos Alperin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axel Thimm Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: FW: zaptel 1.4.0 on Fedora Core 6 x86_64 On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:01:35AM -0500, Carlos Alperin wrote: I tried to test Asterisk 1.4 on FC6 x86_64. I have it working on FC5 x86_64 very good, but since FC keeps updating, I tried to follow newer kernel versions. If you want to save these hassles, why not use the packages bits that are available for FC5/FC6/RHEL4/RHEL3 i386/x86_64/ppc? There are even packages for the upcoming F7 and RHEL5 available: http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk/ http://atrpms.net/name/zaptel/ If you add atrpms to your yum config all you have to do is yum install asterisk zaptel zaptel-kmdl-`uname -r` If you want yum to automatically install new kmdls for new kernels also install yum-plugin-kmdl, and then you only need to use yum update and not worry again (or worry less ...). I can't pass the zaptel compilation. Everything is OK, but when I finished, and tried to load it, allways got module not found when I run modprobe zaptel, and modprobe ztdummy. I already tried to modify is with the sed 1 option but doesn't work. I'm running make linux26, make install. Also, I have the kernel sources, and a symlink to /lib/modules/ Also, I tried the make install-udev, since there was no zap device on /dev/zap but nothing. The error is that when I run modprobe the result is FATAL NO ZAPTEL MODULE FOUND. Any clue about this? Thanks Carlos Alperin -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgp5wP7PusFfG.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Unable to start Asterisk 1.4 on CentOS 4.4 (installed from ATrpms)
Hi, On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 01:09:35PM +1100, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: I am still unable to start Asterisk 1.4 that I installed using ATrpms. I was initially suspecting some permissions issues but it seems to me that its more to do with a speex codec not loading properly. I can confirm that I have speex and speex-devel installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep speex speex-1.0.4-4 speex-devel-1.0.4-4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Thanks for any pointers. Try the speex packages from ATrpms. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpG00KxmxEpC.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Can't find asterisk.ctl under CentOS installation
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:27:03PM +1100, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: I recently upgraded to Asterisk 1.4 using the RPMS at ATrpms.net on CentOS 4.4, Asterisk starts up but when I start the console it reports this error and drops out. Unable to connect to remote asterisk (does /var/run/asterisk/asterisk.ctl exist)? I have checked to see that the file asterisk.ctl actually exists. Any suggestions? Have you tried asterisk -r as root or as a non-root user? See below for details. On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:10:29AM -0500, Steven wrote: If you are not running asterisk as root, then change the permissions on the /var/run/asterisk folder and below to allow you user access. asterisk on ATrpms runs as asterisk:asterisk and the folder belongs to that uid/gid: # ls -ld /var/run/asterisk drwxr-xr-x 2 asterisk asterisk 4096 Jan 16 17:30 /var/run/asterisk Also, I seem to remember that on one release, the entry in asterisk.conf did not match safe_asterisk. So the ctl file was NOT where asterisk was looking. asterisk.conf does point to the same folder. # grep astrundir /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf astrundir = /var/run/asterisk And safe_asterisk/asterisk do use that file according to lsof asterisk3u unix 0x8800332dfc00 213094 /var/run/asterisk/asterisk.ctl If I call asterisk -r as root it succeeds, if as another user it will give Devraj's error message. That's probably how it is supposed to work, or not? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpS41UvgFA8z.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Can't find asterisk.ctl under CentOS installation
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:54:49PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:48:07PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: If I call asterisk -r as root it succeeds, if as another user it will give Devraj's error message. That's probably how it is supposed to work, or not? Just a thought: shouldn't the asterisk user be allowed write access to that control socket? Or maybe the asterisk group? The asterisk user is allowed, too, of course, the group not (yet). (for quickdirty shell scripts) I think that makes very much sense. The socket is created by asterisk, is there a parameter to specify permissions/umask of that socket? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpayWA7IHV3n.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Can't find asterisk.ctl under CentOS installation
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:20:08PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:54:49PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:48:07PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: If I call asterisk -r as root it succeeds, if as another user it will give Devraj's error message. That's probably how it is supposed to work, or not? Just a thought: shouldn't the asterisk user be allowed write access to that control socket? Or maybe the asterisk group? The asterisk user is allowed, too, of course, the group not (yet). (for quickdirty shell scripts) I think that makes very much sense. The socket is created by asterisk, is there a parameter to specify permissions/umask of that socket? Looks like all there is needed is to uncomment the following line in the default config file: [files] astctlpermissions = 0660 But since upstream defaults to not do so and only have this done by the user, I wouldn't like to change this policy on the package level. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpOJ2MiE2aSI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Zaptel under FC6
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:05:13AM +1100, Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote: Hi, all I am building a new server. Have installed FC 6 and put in TDM400 card. Checked out latest asteriusk code, run make install in zaptel directory. So far all is fine. Now I am trying to install the drivers. # modprobe zaptel FATAL: Module zaptel not found. Fair enough, no zaptel driver is found on the system. Is there are any known problems with FC6? I did not have much trouble running on FC3 before. You'll find zaptel, asterisk and all the glue packaged at ATrpms: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/ATrpms -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpxPocq6g1Sg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Installing Ztdummy on Fedora Core 5
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:57:12AM +0300, Rogers Ochieng wrote: Am trying to make zaptel with ztdummy uncommented in FC5 but am getting make error. Has anyone gotten this to work? You should post the errors :) But there are ready-to-use packages at http://ATrpms.net/name/zaptel/, so you don't have to build it yourself at all. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpJqWwzd5fvt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk/Zaptel 64-bit?
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 02:39:34PM +0800, Kenige Ho wrote: On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:03 +0800, Kenige Ho wrote: I was wondering will there be any problems or changes that I will need to do to compile the current Asterisk(1.2.7)/Zaptel(1.2.5)/Libpri(1.2.2) source from www.asterisk.org into a 64-bit binaries? I am currently using the following hardware for my new server. OS: Fedore Core 5 Although I don't have any experience with your particular hardware, afaik there is no issue with building and running zaptel, libpri and asterisk on x86_64 hardware. Works fine for many. You can find (S)RPMs at http://atrpms.net and at http://www.laimbock.com/asterisk/ Also for the zaptel driver and sources, I prefer to a compile on it rather than rpm install. So I wanted to make sure that I wouldn't encounter any problems with a compile and don't want to waste my hardware purchase. It would help if you would at least test the 64 bit packages. And if you find a flaw and report it, you'll improve them and give back something to the community that way (and receive back community karma :). BTW in case you encounter any 64 bits issue (unlikely, but still possible) you can verifiy it's 54 vs 32 bits by installing the 32 bit packages that are known to be well working (you can't do that with zaptel, though). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpTVGwTJiiBJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: rpms updated to 1.2.7.1 (was: Asterisk 1.2.7.1Released)
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 03:12:27PM +0200, Mimmus wrote: Do your (wonderful) RPMs install also on CentOS? I suppose so because it is a Red Hat clone... Yes, the RHEL builds will work on CentOS, WhiteBox, SL etc. by definition :) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axel Thimm rpms for Fedora Core 1-5, RHEL 3-4 and RHL 7.3-9 have been updated: -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgplM22E5ofb7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] rpms updated to 1.2.7.1 (was: Asterisk 1.2.7.1 Released)
rpms for Fedora Core 1-5, RHEL 3-4 and RHL 7.3-9 have been updated: http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk/ http://atrpms.net/name/zaptel/ http://atrpms.net/name/libpri/ http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk-addons/ http://atrpms.net/name/asterisk-sounds/ http://atrpms.net/name/spandsp/ On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:11:33PM -0500, Asterisk Development Team wrote: The Asterisk Development Team has released version 1.2.7.1 of Asterisk. This release contains only two fixes, one of which is that the Page() application was entirely broken in version 1.2.7. If you have already upgraded to 1.2.7 and you do not use the Page() application in your dialplan, there is no need to upgrade to version 1.2.7.1. The release is available on the Digium FTP servers as PGP signed tarballs and also as PGP signed patch files, to ease upgrading from the previous versions. The keys used to sign these files can be verified by using the keyserver at pgp.mit.edu. Thanks for your support of Asterisk! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpJ6ElcVjlt1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Fedora Core 4 - problem with kernel 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:20:15AM -0700, William M Conlon wrote: Thanks. Useful 3rd party repository. I've added it to my yum.repos.d Question: I see you spandsp, but I don't imagine that app_rxfax/ app_txfax are included in your asterisk rpm, Just try it out and you'll have a pleasant surprise. :) so I'll still have to build * from source. Google shows that someone has an asterisk- plugins rpm for Suse that includes the app_rxfax.so/app_txfax.so I imagine others would find that of interest. bill On Apr 6, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 04:30:19PM -0700, William M Conlon wrote: I was just getting to work on fax for my * system, so I thought I would bring everything up to date since there would be some new compilations involved. yum update gave me kernel-2.6.16-1.2069_FC4 but after recompiling zaptel, I kept getting FATAL module zaptel not found Chased this for an hour with multiple recompiles and reboots. Finally dropped back to 2.6.15-1.1833_FC4, which worked before, and still works now. You can try the packages at atrpms.net. They are built for 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgplByAQA4sU2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Fedora Core 4 - problem with kernel 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 04:30:19PM -0700, William M Conlon wrote: I was just getting to work on fax for my * system, so I thought I would bring everything up to date since there would be some new compilations involved. yum update gave me kernel-2.6.16-1.2069_FC4 but after recompiling zaptel, I kept getting FATAL module zaptel not found Chased this for an hour with multiple recompiles and reboots. Finally dropped back to 2.6.15-1.1833_FC4, which worked before, and still works now. You can try the packages at atrpms.net. They are built for 2.6.16-1.2069_FC4. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgps1FbaIE1NZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:28:24PM -0500, Michael Stearne wrote: On 1/3/06, Technical Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do a lot of installs on Fedora (slowly becoming our favorite). Initially clients asked for FC because of compatibility with Red Hat, great package management, etc. With FC4, you get a great set of packages, and not a lot of add-ons required. Asterisk has perfect compatibility with FC3 FC4 - a good choice. I am having trouble with FC3. After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile 1.2.1 from source: make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/include/stddef.h', needed by `localtime.o'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' make: *** [stdtime/libtime.a] Error 2 and when I try to update from binary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm warning: asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 66534c2b error: Failed dependencies: libpri.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libspandsp.so.0 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 libtonezone.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 I have compiled from source 1.0.9 without problem on this machine. Any ideas why my attempts are now failing? The packages containing the missing bits are also at the same place you got this package, ATrpms. Just point apt/yum/smart/up2date to ATrpms and have it automagically get the required dependencies including kernel modules (kmdls). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgppWJ6SQXPfZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:33:49PM -, Brett, Gary wrote: I wish to install asterisk 1.2 (the latest tar.gz from the site not the CVS version) on an HP box with a TE110P (single port E1/T1) My question is which OS would be preferred in this configuration Fedora Core 1 or Fedora Core 3, and are there any install guides out there that are recent enough for asterisk 1.2 I am also open to suggestions for other Operating Systems if any of you feel that FC1/3 are not the best for the job, my only definates are that I use the latest tar.gz from the asterisk.org website not the CVS and also that I will be using the TE110p Most people answered FC1-4 or CentOS (or RHEL in general). Whatever you choose, there is full binary package support at ATrpms.net. So the asterisk part should be the same on each of those distros, and you can base your choice on other factors of the distribution like stability, EOL dates etc. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpDsLbygdOF2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] asterisk rpms (was: Does anyone run Asterisk on FC4? with Digium's TDM40B cards)
Hi, On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:05:51AM -0400, Zachary Whitley wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 16:14 +0600, Madhawa Jayanath wrote: Kumara Jayaweera wrote: Does anyone run Asterisk on FC4? with Digium's TDM40B cards. any success stories? my Intel 865 M'd+ Intel 3.0GHz freezee during installation (FC4). Please any comments? Yes, Without problems. Can u install RH9 on ur box? I'm assuming that Madhawa is suggesting that you install RH9. I've installed Asterisk on FC4 with very few problems. Start with a standard FC4 installation then install the following rpms from atrpms.net: asterisk-addons asterisk-sounds zaptel zaptel-devices One little problem. Maybe it's been fixed but last time I checked it wasn't. In the /etc/init.d/zaptel the path to ztcfg is incorrect. Find all references to ztcfg and change them to = /usr/sbin/ztcfg You can copy the sample configs from /usr/share/doc/asterisk-1.0.9/configs/ to get you going. Running asterisk -c -vvv will let you know which ones you need. The rest is going to be specific to your hardware and setup. Good luck. Thanks for the comments on the packages. I'm looking for more feedback and improvements on the asterisk and friends rpms at ATrpms. Red Hat Linux, Fedora Core and RHEL (and clones) are supported. There are already some bug reports at bugzilla.atrpms.net on enhancements and bugs in the packages, see http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc_type=allwordssubstrshort_desc=long_desc_type=substringlong_desc=asteriskbug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstrbug_file_loc=bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDemailassigned_to1=1emailtype1=substringemail1=emailassigned_to2=1emailreporter2=1emailcc2=1emailtype2=substringemail2=bugidtype=includebug_id=votes=chfieldfrom=chfieldto=Nowchfieldvalue=cmdtype=doitorder=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+timefield0-0-0=nooptype0-0-0=noopvalue0-0-0= Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgph3UTL1jE08.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
