[asterisk-users] Off-topic: SIP DTMF most supported method

2009-04-06 Thread Cesc Santa
Hi,

I know it is a bit off-topic, but I'd like to ask the community what is the
current most supported way to deal with DTMF?
I'm looking for an all-SIP system and I'm mostly interested in the end
devices support of the different methods (DTMF in-band audio, DTMF RTP
telephony events packets, SIP INFO, ...)

Thanks in advance.

Cesc
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk and multicast RTP

2008-11-28 Thread Cesc Santa
Hi,

I would need to bridge a SIP call with a multicast RTP channel. Both sides
are receiving and transmitting RTP.
Googling, I saw that an app_rtppage, which was in the SVN for a while and
its not there anymore. It did, I think, only partly what I need (it sent
from SIP to the mcast ... not the other way around), but it was a start.

Any idea how to do this?
I also could use ser/opensips/openser/kamailio with rtpproxy (does rtpproxy
support this? it would in any case be a complex modification, I think). But
my current setup is based on asterisk, so I'd rather not move it from there
or install new apps.

Thanks a bunch!

Cesc

-- Forwarded message --
From: Cesc Santa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:26 PM
Subject: Asterisk RTP pager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

I came across your RTPpage application and just made me very happy.
If I may, some questions.

* With which Asterisk versions has it been tested? is it in the official
tree?

* What I'd like to do is to link this RTPpage with incoming SIP calls ... so
that all RTP from SIP is dumped to the multicast RTP and viceversa. Is that
possible with this application?

Thanks for your time,

Cesc
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] off-topic: Avaya 46xx, release 032207 ... help

2007-09-19 Thread Cesc Santa
Hi,

I am trying to use an Avaya 4602 phone, which I just updated from a
very old SIP software to the latest I could find on avaya's site
(032207). The upgrade went fine and it gets registered on the Asterisk
server.

Now, a couple of glitches, though.
- The phone's web server is not working ... so I have no easy way to
configure it. It used to work with the old release of the software. I
get on the firefox browser a connection has been reset error
message.
- Avaya admin guide keeps mentioning all the commands you can enter
via the keyboard on the phone ... but they don't work for me ... (the
MUTE + numbers combination).

Any ideas? the web browser problem is the most annoying one.

___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] sip ... codec conversion matrix

2007-08-10 Thread Cesc Santa
inline ...

On 8/10/07, Gordon Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Cesc Santa wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I have asterisk 1.2.18.

 Installed from binary or compiled by yourself?


I compiled it myself ...


 I just took a peak at the command:  show translation
  and I saw that I can only convert from/to ulaw, ulaw, gsm and slin.
  No speex, no ilbc ... do I need a license or compile something extra?
  The G723, 726 and 729 ... I need a license, is that it? one for all of
 them?
  or for each?
 
  How do I get them to work? not just pass-through ... I need conversion.

 Speex and ilibc will be compiled into asterisk automatically. It is on my
 systems (Debian)


I can use them ... but cannot do translation ... only pass-through ... it
complains that
there is no function to convert to internal codec (pcm?)


G726 should also be compiled in as standard - it's supplied with asterisk.


no license to use it needed?

These may not be free enough for your Linux distribution, so that might
 be why you don't have them if you're running a binary installation. Eg.
 iLbc isn't free enough for standard Debian.


well, i use debian, but not the asterisk binary distro ... i compiled myself
from 1.2.18 sources


G723 and G729 are patent encumbered and so you need licenses to run the
 software. You can get G729 licenses from Digium, but I don't know about
 G723...


ok ... i will contact digium for g729 license ... anyone knows about g723?


So maybe you need to compile your own rather than run a binary version?


I did :(   ;)

Thanks!


Gordon

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] sip ... codec conversion matrix

2007-08-10 Thread Cesc Santa
Hi,

I have asterisk 1.2.18.
I just took a peak at the command:  show translation
and I saw that I can only convert from/to ulaw, ulaw, gsm and slin.
No speex, no ilbc ... do I need a license or compile something extra?
The G723, 726 and 729 ... I need a license, is that it? one for all of them?
or for each?

How do I get them to work? not just pass-through ... I need conversion.

Thanks a lot!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] sip ... codec conversion matrix

2007-08-10 Thread Cesc Santa
inline

On 8/10/07, Gordon Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Cesc Santa wrote:

 
  I can use them ... but cannot do translation ... only pass-through ...
 it
  complains that
  there is no function to convert to internal codec (pcm?)
 
  G726 should also be compiled in as standard - it's supplied with
 asterisk.
 
  no license to use it needed?

 None at all.


ok ... i guess i will have to try harder ;)


 These may not be free enough for your Linux distribution, so that might
  be why you don't have them if you're running a binary installation. Eg.
  iLbc isn't free enough for standard Debian.
 
  well, i use debian, but not the asterisk binary distro ... i compiled
 myself
  from 1.2.18 sources

 OK. This is what I do too!

 I have Debian Sarge on my development box.

 So it's strange you don't have iLBC and speex. There is a debian package
 for speex:

 On my development box:

 bob:~# dpkg -l | grep speex
 ii  libspeex-dev   1.1.6-2The Speex Speech Codec
 ii  libspeex1  1.1.6-2The Speex Speech Codec
 ii  speex  1.1.6-2The Speex Speech Codec


this is probably one thing i am missing ... i will check


but I have no iLBC packages - they appear to be in the asterisk source...

 bob:~# asterisk -rx 'show translation'
   Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)

   g723   gsm  ulaw  alaw  g726 adpcm  slin lpc10  g729 speex  ilbc
 g723 - - - - - - - - - - -
  gsm - - 2 2 3 2 1 7 -3119
 ulaw - 4 - 1 3 2 1 7 -3119
 alaw - 4 1 - 3 2 1 7 -3119
 g726 - 4 2 2 - 2 1 7 -3119
adpcm - 4 2 2 3 - 1 7 -3119
 slin - 3 1 1 2 1 - 6 -3018
lpc10 - 5 3 3 4 3 2 - -3220
 g729 - - - - - - - - - - -
speex - 5 3 3 4 3 2 8 - -20
 ilbc - 6 4 4 5 4 3 9 -33 -

 so I get everything apart from g723 and g729. I didn't do anything special
 to the makefile, etc. (other than set the i586 flag as my target box needs
 it)


and this is definitely what I would expect to have ... knowing someone has
it ... i'll get to work :)


 G723 and G729 are patent encumbered and so you need licenses to run the
  software. You can get G729 licenses from Digium, but I don't know about
  G723...
 
  ok ... i will contact digium for g729 license ... anyone knows about
 g723?

 Do you actually need g729? I'd not spend the money on it unless you really
 needed it.

 I've not heard of anyone using or offering g723...

 And I have to say; you're not missing much by not having iLBC or speex.
 The CPU overhead is significant and the voice quality is somewhat
 dubious :) Unless you absolutely really desperately need to compress the
 data stream to squeeze out every ounch of bandwidth, then I'd really not
 use them.

 If you need to compress, start with G726, then move to GSM, and then if
 you need better audio quality, buy g729 licenses.

 Gordon


I agree with you ...  actually, I am interested in G729 (and I am definitely
getting a few licenses).
G723 I also got a customer who would like to see it working in my product
... so I'll check it out.
As for Speex and iLBC, it was some collateral damage ... I was looking at
the transcoding
and knowing these codecs were/are free, I found it strange that I could not
translate them ...
I'll fix that. Even it is just for the fun.

Many thanks!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] sip ... codec conversion matrix

2007-08-10 Thread Cesc Santa
On 8/10/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:35:32AM +0200, Cesc Santa wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I have asterisk 1.2.18.
  I just took a peak at the command:  show translation
  and I saw that I can only convert from/to ulaw, ulaw, gsm and slin.
  No speex, no ilbc ... do I need a license or compile something extra?
  The G723, 726 and 729 ... I need a license, is that it? one for all of
 them?
  or for each?

 Do you have the modules codec_speex.so ? codec_ilbc.so ?
 Are they loaded?

 No special license is needed.


I just checked ... I have the codec_ilbc (as well _g729, _g726  ), but
not codec_speex. I guess I need to get the libspeex-dev package so it
compiles.
And then I checked my configuration of asterisk ... modules.conf ... loaded
all the needed modules (codec_, format_) ... and voila! it works. Now I have
translation between all codecs, except G729 and G723 (and of course, speex,
which I don't have the module for).
Now, G729 I can get a licence from Digium.

Anyone know about G723? Do I need a license? I know it is not very used, but
my costumer requires it ...

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] SIP Refer ... rejected?

2007-07-31 Thread Cesc Santa
Hi,

I have asterisk 1.2.18.
I am trying to get asterisk to react to an (out of dialog) REFER ...
see below. I get a 603 (no dialog) ... and in the code (sip.conf:3277)
a comment being able but not supporting it??
Any pointers would be great ... is it a configuration option?


REFER sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.200.135;branch=z9hG4bKcf61.5bbef4d3.0
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=50315E7E56FF
CSeq: 1 REFER
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
User-Agent: SER 0.9.6
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Refer-To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Referred-By: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--- (11 headers 0 lines) ---
Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.200.135:5060:
SIP/2.0 603 Declined (no dialog)
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.200.135;branch=z9hG4bKcf61.5bbef4d3.0;received=192.168.200.135
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=50315E7E56FF
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as34a5041e
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 REFER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Content-Length: 0

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] G729 with SIP and H.323

2007-07-23 Thread Cesc Santa
Hi,

I need an Asterisk with G729 support. Preference is with Asterisk
1.2(.18), but if not possible, then it can be 1.4.
Question is, can I enable G729 for both protocols? do the H323
implementation allow it? I found the codec support for H323 in 1.2.18
very poor ... only got u/a-law to work ... not even GSM.
Would the Digium G729 license be good both for SIP and H323?

Cesc

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] asterisk 1.2 from svn ... lock on shutdown

2007-05-08 Thread Cesc

Hi,

I hope this gets picked up by some bug marshall ...

I have downloaded (yesterday) the 1.2 branch from svn ...
When running: asterisk -c
loaded modules:
[modules]
autoload=no

load = pbx_functions.so
load = pbx_config.so
load = codec_a_mu.so
load = format_pcm_alaw.so
load = codec_ulaw.so
load = codec_alaw.so
load = format_pcm.so
load = func_uri.so
;required by app_dial and chan_sip
load = res_features.so
load = app_dial.so

;playback and echo apps ...
load = app_playback.so
load = app_echo.so
load = codec_gsm.so
load = format_gsm.so
load = format_wav_gsm.so

load = chan_h323.so
load = chan_sip.so

load = chan_local.so


When I do:  stop now
asterisk hangs up, but locks:
*CLI stop now
Beginning asterisk shutdown
Executing last minute cleanups
Asterisk cleanly ending (0).



I attached gdb to the locked process:

0xb725af28 in std::_Rb_tree_increment () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb725af28 in std::_Rb_tree_increment () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#1  0xb793f304 in std::_Rb_tree_iteratorstd::pairPString const,
PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase* ::operator++ ()
  from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#2  0xb79881a0 in
std::__distancestd::_Rb_tree_iteratorstd::pairPString const,
PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase*   ()
  from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#3  0xb79881cb in
std::distancestd::_Rb_tree_iteratorstd::pairPString const,
PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase*   ()
  from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#4  0xb7989ee6 in std::_Rb_treePString, std::pairPString const,
PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase*,
std::_Select1ststd::pairPString const, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
PString::WorkerBase* , std::lessPString,
std::allocatorstd::pairPString const, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
PString::WorkerBase*  ::erase () from
/usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#5  0xb7989f20 in std::mapPString, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
PString::WorkerBase*, std::lessPString,
std::allocatorstd::pairPString const, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
PString::WorkerBase*  ::erase () from
/usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#6  0xb7989f5a in PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
PString::Unregister_Internal () from
/usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#7  0xb7989f9d in PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::Unregister ()
from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#8  0xb7989fc9 in OpalPluginMediaFormat::~OpalPluginMediaFormat ()
from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#9  0xb748bea1 in PAbstractList::RemoveAt () from
/usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
#10 0xb74892e1 in PCollection::RemoveAll () from
/usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
#11 0xb7489e25 in PAbstractList::DestroyContents () from
/usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
#12 0xb7490152 in PContainer::Destruct () from
/usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
#13 0xb791ca57 in PAbstractList::~PAbstractList () from
/usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#14 0xb79755c9 in PListOpalMediaFormat::~PList () from
/usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#15 0xb79828e7 in H323PluginCodecManager::~H323PluginCodecManager ()
from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
#16 0xb7e0d4f0 in exit () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#17 0x080bddd7 in quit_handler (num=135324439, nice=3, safeshutdown=1,
restart=0) at asterisk.c:945
#18 0x080be019 in handle_shutdown_now (fd=1, argc=2, argv=0xb830)
at asterisk.c:1104
#19 0x0809811b in ast_cli_command (fd=1, s=0x8151900 \001) at cli.c:1364
#20 0x080c0d93 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbd84) at asterisk.c:1019
(gdb)


Regards,

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: h323 problem with asterisk 1.2.18

2007-05-08 Thread Cesc

Hi guys,

I had the same problem ... and then remembered that my asterisk
1.2.9.1 compiled just fine ...
So, i tried that Makefile ... and voila! :)
See attached patch ...

Cesc

On 5/8/07, nik600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 5/7/07, nik600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 i am experiencing problem with asterisk 1.2.18

 I've downloaded and installed pwlib and openh323 with the following commands:

 cd /path/to/pwlib
 ./configure
 make clean opt
 cd /path/to/openh323
 ./configure
 make clean opt

 then 'ive set the corresponding PATH

 PWLIBDIR=/data/programmi/asterisk_1.2.18/pwlib_v1_10_0/
 export PWLIBDIR
 OPENH323DIR=/data/programmi/asterisk_1.2.18/openh323_v1_18_0/
 export OPENH323DIR
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWLIBDIR/lib:$OPENH323DIR/lib
 export LD_LIBRARY_PATH


 but when i go to:
 cd asterisk-1.2.18/channels/h323/
 and do a make opt:

 [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:/data/programmi/asterisk_1.2.18/asterisk-1.2.18/channels/h323#
 make opt
 make: *** No rule to make target `opt'.  Stop.

 why?

 where am i wrong? i've also tried the last version of pwlib and
 openh323, but without fixing the problem

 thanks


 --
 /*/
 nik600
 https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccmanager
 https://sourceforge.net/projects/nikstresser


i've also tried supported version
 Open H.323 version v1.17.1, PWLib v1.9.0
but.. it doesn't compile.

It seems to be a problem with makefile

--
/*/
nik600
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccmanager
https://sourceforge.net/projects/nikstresser
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



asterisk.1.2.18.svn63330.h323.patch
Description: Binary data
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk 1.2 from svn ... lock on shutdown

2007-05-08 Thread Cesc

Hi,

I will add the report ... though I find the system a bit cumbersome
for sporadic users like me.

Oh, and you are right ... without chan_h323 asterisk shuts down just fine.

Regards,

Cesc

On 5/8/07, Joshua Colp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Cesc wrote:
 Hi,

 I hope this gets picked up by some bug marshall ...


Eep! Filing a bug is best instead of email it here for future reference...

 I attached gdb to the locked process:

 0xb725af28 in std::_Rb_tree_increment () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
 (gdb) bt
 #0  0xb725af28 in std::_Rb_tree_increment () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
 #1  0xb793f304 in std::_Rb_tree_iteratorstd::pairPString const,
 PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase* ::operator++ ()
   from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #2  0xb79881a0 in
 std::__distancestd::_Rb_tree_iteratorstd::pairPString const,
 PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase*   ()
   from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #3  0xb79881cb in
 std::distancestd::_Rb_tree_iteratorstd::pairPString const,
 PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase*   ()
   from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #4  0xb7989ee6 in std::_Rb_treePString, std::pairPString const,
 PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::WorkerBase*,
 std::_Select1ststd::pairPString const, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
 PString::WorkerBase* , std::lessPString,
 std::allocatorstd::pairPString const, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
 PString::WorkerBase*  ::erase () from
 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #5  0xb7989f20 in std::mapPString, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
 PString::WorkerBase*, std::lessPString,
 std::allocatorstd::pairPString const, PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
 PString::WorkerBase*  ::erase () from
 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #6  0xb7989f5a in PFactoryOpalMediaFormat,
 PString::Unregister_Internal () from
 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #7  0xb7989f9d in PFactoryOpalMediaFormat, PString::Unregister ()
 from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #8  0xb7989fc9 in OpalPluginMediaFormat::~OpalPluginMediaFormat ()
 from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #9  0xb748bea1 in PAbstractList::RemoveAt () from
 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
 #10 0xb74892e1 in PCollection::RemoveAll () from
 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
 #11 0xb7489e25 in PAbstractList::DestroyContents () from
 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
 #12 0xb7490152 in PContainer::Destruct () from
 /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.9.2
 #13 0xb791ca57 in PAbstractList::~PAbstractList () from
 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #14 0xb79755c9 in PListOpalMediaFormat::~PList () from
 /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #15 0xb79828e7 in H323PluginCodecManager::~H323PluginCodecManager ()
 from /usr/lib/libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.17.3
 #16 0xb7e0d4f0 in exit () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
 #17 0x080bddd7 in quit_handler (num=135324439, nice=3, safeshutdown=1,
 restart=0) at asterisk.c:945
 #18 0x080be019 in handle_shutdown_now (fd=1, argc=2, argv=0xb830)
 at asterisk.c:1104
 #19 0x0809811b in ast_cli_command (fd=1, s=0x8151900 \001) at cli.c:1364
 #20 0x080c0d93 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbd84) at asterisk.c:1019
 (gdb)



This is definitely an issue with chan_h323 and OpenH323. If you don't
load chan_h323 can you then shut down fine? If so please file a bug on
bugs.digium.com and the individual who looks after that stuff will look
at it.

Thanks!

Joshua Colp
Software Developer
Digium, Inc.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] H323 to H323 bridging ... failed ... also with chan_local

2007-05-07 Thread Cesc

Hi,

I am using Asterisk 1.2.9.1, with chan_h323.
The problem I am coming across is when trying to bridge an incoming
H323 call with another H323 call:

phone1 dials into asterisk with H323, for extension 111
in asterisk:
exten = 111, 1, Dial(chan_h323, H323/[EMAIL PROTECTED])(in my
extensions.conf the syntax is good ... this is no).

I can see how the first call is partially processed, then the call to
phone 2 is setup (completed) and when trying to proceed with call from
phone1, asterisk stops:

*CLI -- Executing Dial(H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1894/4096,
H323/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new stack
   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May  7 11:29:22 WARNING[845]: channel.c:2693
ast_channel_make_compatible: No path to translate from
H323/wave-1(-2033656) to H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1894/4096(-2033656)
   -- H323/wave-1 answered H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1894/4096
May  7 11:29:22 WARNING[845]: channel.c:2693
ast_channel_make_compatible: No path to translate from
H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1894/4096(-2033656) to H323/wave-1(-2033656)
May  7 11:29:22 WARNING[845]: app_dial.c:1586 dial_exec_full: Had to
drop call because I couldn't make H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1894/4096
compatible with H323/wave-1
 == Spawn extension (h323_default, 811, 1) exited non-zero on
'H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1894/4096'


I have tried with both phones individually, and both are
asterisk-compatible with H323. Bridging works if the originating
call is SIP, for example. But if I try H323 with H323, it's a nono.
Am I doing something wrong? do I need to set up some parameter? I
thought about using chan_local, but I came across this:
*CLI -- Executing Dial(H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1940/4096,
local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n) in new stack
May  7 11:31:47 WARNING[860]: channel.c:2512 ast_request: No
translator path exists for channel type local (native -1) to -2033656
May  7 11:31:47 NOTICE[860]: app_dial.c:1040 dial_exec_full: Unable to
create channel of type 'local' (cause 0 - Unknown)
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
   -- Executing Wait(H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1940/4096, 1) in new stack
   -- Executing Playback(H323/ip$192.168.1.100:1940/4096,
/etc/asterisk/sounds/pbx-invalid) in new stack
   -- Playing '/etc/asterisk/sounds/pbx-invalid' (language 'en')


Thanks in advance!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] isdn cross-over ...

2006-10-09 Thread Cesc

Hi,

I am sure this is a bit off topic, but maybe the people here have the knowledge.
Quick question: I have two ISDN S/T phones. What is the quickest way
to test them (call one from the other)? can i make an isdn cross-over
cable, taking the correct pinning, of course? What i need is to avoid
the need for an NT connection (via a PBX).

If the above is not possible ... where can I buy a cheap, small,
simple ISDN PBX with at least two NT ports, so that i can connect my
two phones and call each other?

Tks!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] isdn cross-over ...

2006-10-09 Thread Cesc

Thanks for the link.The VConsole equipment seems to be a close match
to what i am looking for, just quite expensive ... but i hope that the
company i work for will pay for it :)

I see many options here. It came to my knowledge that we have a PSTN +
1 ISDN pbx ... a small quattrovox box. How can I connect the 2 phones
in that one ISDN? and, can i call one from the other in this fashion?

Cesc

On 10/9/06, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:55:51AM -0500, Ejay Hire wrote:
 Hi.  A cross-over cable won't work, the isdn network provides signalling
 and adressing functions.

 When I was studying for my CCIE, an ISDN simulator cost an arm-and-a-leg,
 around $1k used from ebay.

They appear to have come down:

http://search.ebay.com/isdn-bri-simulator_W0QQfrppZ50QQfsopZ1QQmaxrecordsreturnedZ300

Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer  Baylink RFC 2100
Ashworth  AssociatesThe Things I Think'87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA  http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274

That's women for you; you divorce them, and 10 years later,
  they stop having sex with you.  -- Jennifer Crusie; _Fast_Women_
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk on 2.4 kernel ... scheduler problem?

2006-09-29 Thread Cesc

inline ...

On 9/28/06, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Cesc wrote:
 Hello people!

 I have an inquiry (not a doubt ;D ). Actually, two.

 I am trying to run asterisk on an embedded Power PC platform on which
 we have a linux with a 2.4.2x kernel.

Still uses 2.4 today? Not a very good sign.



yeah, i know ... but multiple issues here: management and money;
backwards compatibility (not all sectors are concerned about cutting
edge) and reduced size of the 2.4 kernel. Anyway ... it is just the
way it is :)


 In there, the linux scheduler
 runs at 100Hz. On a 2.6 kernel, the scheduler is at 1KHz. I just take
 this from a colleague ... hope it is true :)  I only need to run the
 VOIP part, thus no POTS or external hardware. Actually, I just need
 SIP and H323 (channels/h323). Is there any problem to be expected from
 the scheduler difference? Or any other from running on a 2.4 kernel?
 Some colleague said that asterisk needs the 1KHz scheduler, but i
 cannot believe that it won't run on a 2.4 kernel ... Anyway, that is
 why i am asking.

If you really want a 1kHz timing source for 2.4, build zaptel. But
you'll need a USB UHCI chip.


my question is, do i really need the 1Khz scheduler? remember i just
want to operate SIP and H323 ...
If i do really need it ... there is NO chance to add any extra
software or the like. It has to be all software based, otherwise it is
a nono.

No one else uses asterisk with a 2.4 kernel? forget the Power PC story
.. but just 2.4?



 The other inquiry ... as the system is embedded we have not so much
 disk space available. So, i need a minimal asterisk installation. When
 compiled and stripped, the biggest amount of space is taken by the
 modules. My question is, can asterisk work with just the chan_sip.so,
 chan_h323.so and the codec_*.so? is there any other module needed? I
 need only be able to bridge sip to h323, no extra fancy stuff needed
 (parking, echo, blah, blah, ... )

Don't autoload modules in modules.conf . Load only the modules you need.
Use 'load' from the CLI to manually load modules to see if you need
them.

One shortcut you may take is to use DeStar. It is an Asterisk
configuration generator that generates a configuration with explicit
load in modules.conf, rather than loading everything...


ok, i will do that ... i will try to cut to a bare minimum. Tks!

REgards,

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] asterisk on 2.4 kernel ... scheduler problem?

2006-09-28 Thread Cesc

Hello people!

I have an inquiry (not a doubt ;D ). Actually, two.

I am trying to run asterisk on an embedded Power PC platform on which
we have a linux with a 2.4.2x kernel. In there, the linux scheduler
runs at 100Hz. On a 2.6 kernel, the scheduler is at 1KHz. I just take
this from a colleague ... hope it is true :)  I only need to run the
VOIP part, thus no POTS or external hardware. Actually, I just need
SIP and H323 (channels/h323). Is there any problem to be expected from
the scheduler difference? Or any other from running on a 2.4 kernel?
Some colleague said that asterisk needs the 1KHz scheduler, but i
cannot believe that it won't run on a 2.4 kernel ... Anyway, that is
why i am asking.

The other inquiry ... as the system is embedded we have not so much
disk space available. So, i need a minimal asterisk installation. When
compiled and stripped, the biggest amount of space is taken by the
modules. My question is, can asterisk work with just the chan_sip.so,
chan_h323.so and the codec_*.so? is there any other module needed? I
need only be able to bridge sip to h323, no extra fancy stuff needed
(parking, echo, blah, blah, ... )

Tks a lot!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Cisco 7960 part numbers ...

2006-09-19 Thread Cesc
Hi,I requested a quote from a cisco reseller (or something like this) for 2 cisco 7960 phones, ideally preloaded with SIP firmware ... and i got the quote back with: 1x CP-7960-CH1 and 1x CP-7960-CCME. My question is, what is the difference between the two? If these are not the part number for the pre-loaded SIP phones, what part number is the correct? and what about the service contract ... when is it needed?
Thank you very much ...Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] alcatel ip touch 4068 ... sip?

2006-07-27 Thread Cesc

Hi,

Quickie ... is the alcatel ip touch 4068 (or any other in that series)
sip enabled?
If not, does alcatel have a sip-enabled phone?

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: RE : [asterisk-users] Asterisk and H.323

2006-07-24 Thread Cesc

On 7/24/06, Aaron Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I have been messing with both all day.  I think what might be tripping me
up is the extensions.conf.


i do think so too :)



 I was able to receive an incoming connection from the client, but all the
system returned was a busy signal.  This call was to a known good number (my
phone) so I'm not sure what's wrong.


if you got the incoming connection but then got a busy tone, it is
because the peer info in your asterisk conf is not good ...
try the standard demo setup in asterisk ... there you can call
extension 600 (i think) and you get an echo test ...
later, extend this to call whoever you want ... but you'll need to
enter the location info somehow (i never did it ... ). I used
sjphone for testing ... try it ... you can add an extension to dial
directly to the IP address of the sjphone. So, you dial the MMM
extension on your phone, get to asterisk and then asterisk dials the
IP address of sjphone ... nice and easy for testing.


 Will gnugk do a translation from h.323 to sip so I don't have to make any
major modifications?  Is there an example gnugk.ini and h323.conf file I can
look at to get this all running?


gnugk has no clue of sip.
gnugk is a gatekeeper for h323 ... you can do stuff with the dialled
numbers ... forwarding the call to various [asterisk] h323 gateways
and the like ... but the conversion of h323 to sip is done in
asterisk.


Cesc




 Thank you in advance
 Aaron


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,

Try both chan_oh323 and gnugk .

Harry
--- Aaron Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :



 I have been scouring the net the last couple of days
looking for some
kind of tutorial or walkthrough on setting up a
h.323 channel in asterisk.

What I need to do is basically this:

I have a client who wants to be able to connect to
me via h.323 and make
a local phone call (local to me, he is in a
different country). The
call is an automated process and no callee
interaction is required. My
client simply wants to be able to call a user and
give them a
verification number and then hang up. He's using
some in-house software
so unfortunately, h.323 is his only option.

Can someone point me to a doc or perhaps give me a
simple breakdown of
what I need to add to asterisk in order to be able
to do this? I am on
a tight deadline and my searches have not revealed
the information I am
looking for. I have built chan_h323 and it is
loaded but I'm not sure
how to set it up beyond that.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thank you
Aaron
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:



http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le
sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos
opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
___ --Bandwidth
and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-
This message was scanned by Sunny-Net SpamVirus Detector Gateway If this is
not spam but was Maked with SPAM in the subject line please forward this
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if this is spam but was not marked spam
please forward the e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thankyou


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: RE : [asterisk-users] Asterisk and H.323

2006-07-24 Thread Cesc

On 7/24/06, Aaron Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks for the response. I have been able to now receive calls over
h.323 using sjphone through the built in ooh323 channel driver.  It
seems to work ok for a bit but then asterisk seems to stop accepting
connections and the server needs to be rebooted.


huh? i didn't do extensive testing ... but on my 1.2.9.1 it seemed to
work in a stable way ... i would reboot every now and then, but it
would easily resist more than a few calls ...

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] sip to h323 ... direct RTP?

2006-06-21 Thread Cesc

On 6/21/06, Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


- Johansson Olle E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 No. It's certainly possible but at this time there's no interaction
 between
 the RTP clients, the various channel drivers.

I believe this is incorrect; all the RTP-using channel drivers supply 
'ast_rtp_bridge' as their native bridge method, so assuming they also implement 
the 'set_rtp_peer' method, then an RTP native bridge between dissimilar 
channels should work fine. If the channel driver(s) also support sending the 
RTP peer address to the endpoint (as chan_sip does with reinvite), then a 
direct media path should also be possible.



Sorry, but I am confused.
What does this mean for the bare-bones user like me? That technically
it would be possible but that it is not implemented? (i use the sip
and h323 channels shipped with the latest sources tarball) Or that it
is possible to configure via some obscure setup file?

Thanks!

Cesc


--
Kevin P. Fleming
Senior Software Engineer
Digium, Inc.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers

2006-06-21 Thread Cesc

In general, you are talking of distributed conferencing, which in SIP
it was tried once to standardize but never reached anything. It is
just not commercially popular, i guess.
Now, this doesn't mean that it cannot  be done or that it has not been
done ... but it is propietary implementations. And in my particular
knowledge, i know asterisk was not the choice.

Just my 2 cents.

Cesc

On 6/20/06, Douglas Garstang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
 Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Conferencing with multiple servers


 On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:22 +0100, Wildheart wrote:
  Hi,
 
 I am trying to join 2 asterisk servers together using a
 sip channel.
  This is so, if a user joins a conference on box A and another user
  joins a conference on box B, providing they are in the same
 conference
  room, the two conferences are joined via the sip channel.
 We only want
  to join the conferences together if they have users in them and we
  don't want to point all the conferences to one server as we
 would like
  to try to balance the load a bit.

This is a general problem with the 'enterprise grade' aspects of Asterisk. As 
far as I know, there is no way to distribute applications (eg: Queue, Meetme 
etc) between multiple Asterisk systems. You really need to run the applications 
that will serve a common set of phones on the same Asterisk system, and then 
fail over to a secondary if necessary.

Doug.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk h323

2006-06-21 Thread Cesc

Hi,

I am also testing asterisk with H323, with the channel included in the
latest sources. It works ( i had some problems with media
configuration when calling from an SJPhone ... but it seems more an
SJPhone problem than asterisk).
I also bridged from SIP to H323 ... it works fine.

I have a question for those out there ... i compiled with pwlib 1.9.2
and openh323 1.17.3. These are the versions mentioned in the README
file for the h323 channel.
Now, has anyone tried any newer version? I would be more comfortable
using the latest stable release for these required libraries with
asterisk ... just to make sure i get the best. Any experiences??

Cesc

On 6/20/06, Alberto Sagredo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Im using several Asterisk Box with chanh323 from asterisk, and it works
fine.

Sometime it gets deadlocks , but on 1.2.9.1 and 1.2.7 i have estability.
A fail (crash) last month with about 600 calls per day.

Regards

Alberto Sagredo


hakem voip escribió:
 You can do this by installing a h323 module.

 Conversion works simetimes good, sometimes not good. H323 behaviour on
 asterosk with my experience with kind of unpredictable.


 2006/6/20, Khaled Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi

 Can asterisk work as sip and h323 protocol in the same time ,and
 how is the conversion protocol works .

 Please if u know send me how to active h323 protocol or the
 conversion protocol







 Regards



 
 *
 No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding
 agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail
 without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium.
 Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do
 not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and
 associates.

 This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed
 to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information
 protected from disclosure belonging to Xplorium.

 If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message
 and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system
 and notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this
 message or attachment or disclose its content to any other person.

 Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic
 message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from
 computer viruses or other defects.
 *


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
 http://easynews.com/ --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





 --
 Hakem Voip
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] H.323 soft phone known to be run with asterisk.

2006-06-21 Thread Cesc

I had problems with sjphone ... same version as yours.
Finally, i managed to solve it by:
- in sjphone, media channels settings: untick Use remote codec
preferences and Open audio streams after remote opened ... it was
trial-error ... now it works (to Echo and Sip-H323 call).
- in asterisk, h323.conf ... the codec configuration ... i commented
all lines related to it ...
;disallow=all
;allow=all
;allow=gsm
;disallow=g723.1
(just in case)
(again, trial-error)

Cesc

On 6/21/06, Pawel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hallo group members
Could You tell me a h.323 soft phone that runs well with asterisk.
I tried the following so far, but in general I cannot compile them (fc.3) or I 
cannot configure them to run with asterisk:

http://www.pacphone.com/downloads/PacPhoneSetup117.exe - cannot configure
http://www.sjlabs.com/softphone/SJphone-289a.exe - cannot configure
http://cphone.sourceforge.net/ - cannot compile
http://www.ekiga.org/ - cannot compile
http://www.openh323.org/ - cannot compile

Greetings.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] sip to h323 ... direct RTP?

2006-06-19 Thread Cesc

Hi,

Thanks to those who hinted on the SIP/H323/Skinny capabilities of
asterisk ... I am starting to like this app! :D

Now, I successfully managed to bridge SIP to H323 (i don't have skinny
phones here). Just a question: Is it possible to have Asterisk just
as a signalling proxy? i have a flat test network, and i would like
the RTP streams to be sent directly end to end (sip phone to h323
phone). It should be possible ... but is it possible with asterisk?

Thanks!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] sip to h323 gateway ...

2006-06-15 Thread Cesc

Hi,

I am familiar with asterisk, though never actually tinkered with one
myself ... so i don't know the full extent of its capabilities.

I am facing a request to bridge a sip network and an h323 network.
I would like to operate the sip with ser as the proxy and some
gatekeeper on the h323 side (not required though).
Actually, i have a few more points that may make it simpler
- i do not need codec negotiation: both sides are configured use
the same (g711 alaw) by default.
- I have just a few phones on each side, so even static routing
can work, if that is of any help.
- it is not a production environment, for now. It is a demo/lab

The question is ... can asterisk do the job?

Ideally, the bridge would be only signalling-wise (rtp to be direct
end-to-end). But, if someone had bad experience with this and would
recommend to use a B2BUA approach, please, tell me.

I don't know if it makes a difference, but most of the calls would go
from the H323 side to the SIP side ... but i don't really want to
restrict SIP-H323.

Thanks a lot!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] open source sip softphone (Window OS version )

2006-06-15 Thread Cesc

minisip (http://www.minisip.org) - it is LGPL, GPL ... windows support
is in testing status

On 6/15/06, Kerry Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

None of those are open source that I recall.
-Kerry


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Derek Whitten
 Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 6:07 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] open source sip softphone
 (Window OS version )

 Asterisk guy wrote:
  are there any open source sip softphone (Window OS version )?
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 xlite
 sjphone
 firefly (3rd party version)





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] sip to h323 gateway ...

2006-06-15 Thread Cesc

So, asterisk does the bridging ... I asked on another list and the
answer was that asterisk could not do the job :O
The truth is that my setup should be fairly simple ... i do not need
any cool feature (voicemail and the like). I just need to call from
one side to the other, for a reduced amount of users (so name mapping
could even be manual ... no problem).

Cesc

On 6/15/06, Gary Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm bridging a Cisco Call Manager 3.2 system (h323 only) to an asterisk SIP
setup. It works. There are issues, but that has more to do with Unity
voicemail than the h323 implementations.


 On 6/15/06, Cesc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

I am familiar with asterisk, though never actually tinkered with one
myself ... so i don't know the full extent of its capabilities.

I am facing a request to bridge a sip network and an h323 network.
 I would like to operate the sip with ser as the proxy and some
gatekeeper on the h323 side (not required though).
Actually, i have a few more points that may make it simpler
- i do not need codec negotiation: both sides are configured use
the same (g711 alaw) by default.
- I have just a few phones on each side, so even static routing
can work, if that is of any help.
- it is not a production environment, for now. It is a demo/lab

The question is ... can asterisk do the job?

Ideally, the bridge would be only signalling-wise (rtp to be direct
end-to-end). But, if someone had bad experience with this and would
recommend to use a B2BUA approach, please, tell me.

I don't know if it makes a difference, but most of the calls would go
from the H323 side to the SIP side ... but i don't really want to
restrict SIP-H323.

Thanks a lot!

Cesc
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] sip to h323 gateway ...

2006-06-15 Thread Cesc

Ok,

I will trust you guys :) But it is puzzling that on another list (SER)
someone (actually 2 people) told me that asterisk would not do the
job. One suggested Yate ... any opinion? (I know ... not nice to ask
in the asterisk list ... but it is good to compare, i think).

Now, just to make sure that if it works for you it does for me ...
what version of asterisk you are running?  :D

Cesc

On 6/16/06, Tigran Kocharyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It should do the job!
In my setup, I call from an IAX phone to an h323 Gateway, and all is
fine. The opposite direction also works fine.
Though this is an IAX setup, SIP should perform likewise.

REgards,
Hohenzolern


Gary Richardson wrote:

 Nope, asterisk does the bridging. Asterisk can talk to SIP phones and
 H323 gateways/phones. It can also cross connect them.

 Since I have SIP users plugged into asterisk, I have a dial plan that
 looks something like:

 exten = 100,1,Macro(local_sip_user,SIP/bill)
 exten = 101,1,Macro(local_sip_user,SIP/bob)
 exten = 102,1,Macro(local_sip_user,SIP/steve)
 exten = _XXX,1,Macro(call_ccm,${EXTEN})
 exten = _8XXX,1,Macro(call_ccm,${EXTEN:1})

 So, if you dial 100-102, you get a sip call, but if you dial 103, it
 would try to dial my CCM. If you dial 8100, it would call CCM anyway.

 From the cisco side, I have some similar logic. That's pretty much it.

 On 6/15/06, *Cesc* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So, asterisk does the bridging ... I asked on another list and the
 answer was that asterisk could not do the job :O
 The truth is that my setup should be fairly simple ... i do not need
 any cool feature (voicemail and the like). I just need to call from
 one side to the other, for a reduced amount of users (so name mapping
 could even be manual ... no problem).

 Cesc

 On 6/15/06, Gary Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'm bridging a Cisco Call Manager 3.2 system (h323 only) to an
 asterisk SIP
  setup. It works. There are issues, but that has more to do with
 Unity
  voicemail than the h323 implementations.
 
 
   On 6/15/06, Cesc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hi,
 
  I am familiar with asterisk, though never actually tinkered with
 one
  myself ... so i don't know the full extent of its capabilities.
 
  I am facing a request to bridge a sip network and an h323 network.
   I would like to operate the sip with ser as the proxy and some
  gatekeeper on the h323 side (not required though).
  Actually, i have a few more points that may make it simpler
  - i do not need codec negotiation: both sides are configured use
  the same (g711 alaw) by default.
  - I have just a few phones on each side, so even static routing
  can work, if that is of any help.
  - it is not a production environment, for now. It is a demo/lab
 
  The question is ... can asterisk do the job?
 
  Ideally, the bridge would be only signalling-wise (rtp to be direct
  end-to-end). But, if someone had bad experience with this and would
  recommend to use a B2BUA approach, please, tell me.
 
  I don't know if it makes a difference, but most of the calls
 would go
  from the H323 side to the SIP side ... but i don't really want to
  restrict SIP-H323.
 
  Thanks a lot!
 
  Cesc
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
 http://Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
 http://Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
 http://Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com