Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with SPA-2000 and Asterisk 1.0.5

2005-02-22 Thread Josh Roberson
Carlos Chavez wrote:
I had everything working fine until today.  Today the Sipura cannot dial
anywhere.  I just get the following:
Feb 10 12:48:18 NOTICE[1205]: chan_sip.c:7399 handle_request: Unable to
create/find channel
Feb 10 12:48:19 NOTICE[1205]: chan_sip.c:7399 handle_request: Unable to
create/find channel
Feb 10 12:48:35 NOTICE[1205]: chan_sip.c:7399 handle_request: Unable to
create/find channel
Feb 10 12:48:35 NOTICE[1205]: chan_sip.c:7399 handle_request: Unable to
create/find channel
Every time you pick up the phone and dial anything the above appears in
the console.  The strange things is that I can dial to that extension and talk
without problems.  I did not change anything on both sides that may account
for a problem, it just started today.  I did a factory reset on the Sipura and
re configured it and I still have the same problem.
I don't know what to do next.  Any ideas?
 

I've recently encountered the same issue here.  I've narrowed down the 
problem to be authentication failures, although it doesn't readily say 
it.  See if this doesn't clear up if you remove the secret= line from 
the user/friend entry in sip.conf, and from the UA (sip client).  If so, 
then could you please email me off list with your network setup so I can 
attempt to make a determination of wether or not there's something 
similar in the setup?

-Josh (twisted)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Your Acerbic Tyrant will be off line for about 10 days

2005-01-25 Thread Josh Roberson
Next time you decide to move, have enough courtesy to *NOT* inform the 
other 8000+ subscribers of the list, as most of us could care less, and 
you're just wasting bandwidth.Yes, this post is too, but I feel it's 
okay since you also managed to CROSS POST THIS CRAP to the other lists.

Thanks, have a great move. Don't drop a tv on your toe.
Race Vanderdecken wrote:
Greetings List,
I know many of you are looking for advice from me but I am moving from
the 28th until about the 4th of February.
As moving does not always go as planned so I am letting you know that I
may be out of internet touch for 10 days during the move depending on
the closing and the Cable Modem guy. In case any cares to know, I am
moving from South Florida to Asheville.
I will try to check mail often but please do not think I am being rude
if I do not answer for a while.
Race Vanderdecken
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ResponseTimeout problem

2004-11-14 Thread Josh Roberson
Joseph wrote:
[snip]
 

I'm assuming you have snipped the priorities 1 and 2.
exten = s,3,BackGround(welcome)
exten = s,4,ResponseTimeout,15
exten = t,1,Goto(1,1)
Description
ResponseTimeout(seconds)
Set the maximum amount of time permitted after falling through a series 
of priorities for a channel in which the user may begin typing an 
extension. If the user does not type an extension in this amount of 
time, control will pass to the 't' extension if it exists, and if not, 
the call would be terminated.

If ResponseTimeout is not explicitly set in an extension, the default 
value of 15 seconds will be used.
   

Thank you, it work!  So it needs to be pass to: exten = t,1,Goto(1,1)
I got confused by the last sentence ...and if not, the call would be
terminated.
 

This is correct.  However, if you wish to have it pause between 
priorities for an extension change, try using the application 
WaitExten.  Here's a show application waitexten:

 -= Info about application 'WaitExten' =-
[Synopsis]:
Waits for some time
[Description]:
 Wait([seconds]): Waits for the user to enter a new extension for the
specified number of seconds, then returns 0.  Seconds can be passed with
fractions of a seconds (eg: 1.5 = 1.5 seconds) or if unspecified the
default extension timeout will be used.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ResponseTimeout problem

2004-11-14 Thread Josh Roberson
Joseph wrote:
This is correct.  However, if you wish to have it pause between 
priorities for an extension change, try using the application 
WaitExten.  Here's a show application waitexten:

 -= Info about application 'WaitExten' =-
   

Yes, I was looking at it already but it is available in ver. 1.0.0 and
up; I'm on 0.9 on Gentoo.  Gentoo is kind of slow when it comes to
Asterisk.  There is an unstable ver. 1.0.2 in unstable branch but it
doesn't compile (there is an error when compiling).
So I will have to learn how to upgrade using CVS or wait for Gentoo
stable version.  If I use CVS I'm not sure if startup scrip will be
upgraded as well in /etc/init.d/
 

I don't see any reason the startup script would need to be updated.  
Apparently, however, gentoo has 1.0.1 is in the portage tree now, if you 
do an emerge sync, or possibly you need to look deeper.   I'm not a 
gentoo user by any means, but this is being reported to me by a gentoo 
user at this very moment.

-J
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SysMaster and GPL Violation (lets think before we

2004-11-14 Thread Josh Roberson
Okay.. this is geting out of hand.   Please end this thread now, and 
take it off list.  Personal attacks have NO place on a mailing list.

Jay Milk wrote:
I thought Kevin Walsh was Asterisk's bitch?
 

-Original Message-
From: Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 8:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SysMaster and GPL Violation 
(lets think before we

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:30:23 -0800, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
   

Only if we can move the top-post discussion there too
Gary wrote:
 

Hi folks,
Might I propose a new mailing list ??
Asterisk-bitch
Thus discussions such as the one with this topic could be 
   

moved to it 
   

rather than clutter up an already very busy list.
All those in favour ?
   

Only if we can move the top-post discussion there too
 

Sure, 
any of those types of debate.

In fact, i just wished people would NOT use the list for debates !! .
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster isk-users
To 
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pause during dial

2004-11-10 Thread Josh Roberson
information of this nature is on the wiki at 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk

I will go ahead and give you a hint, however.  the 'w' digit means 
wait, or pause, in dialing.

-Josh
Henry Devito wrote:
Is there a way to put pauses in a dial string?  I need * to dial a 
number then pause for 6 seconds and dial a second string of numbers.

 

I have now Dial(ZAP/1/18005551212)But I need it to be 
Dial(ZAP/1/18005551212,pause for six seconds,454545) .

 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] wcfxs module doesn't load

2004-11-05 Thread Josh Roberson
Tom Lahti wrote:

Question on installation issue:
I noticed that the product literature for the TDM400P states that it 
is PCI 2.2 compliant, but it doesn't say that PCI 2.2 is required.  
Does the TDM400P _require_ PCI 2.2 in order to function?  I'm trying 
it in an older motherboard that is PCI 2.1 compliant.

--
-- =
   Tom Lahti
   Tx3 Online Services
   (888)4-TX3-SVC (489-3782)
   http://www.tx3.net/
-- =
First of all, please don't repost just because you haven't gotten an 
answer in 2 hours.  

Secondly, yes, it has to be 2.2, in my experience.  I have not had any 
luck whatsoever getting it to work in a 2.1 slot.

-Josh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] moh

2004-10-31 Thread Josh Roberson
Just an FYI:
   If you are *EVER* unsure that mpg123 is correctly installed (correct 
verison etc), you can enter the asterisk source tree, and type 'make 
mpg123' (without quotes), and mpg123 v0.59r will be download ed, 
unpacked, and built for you, and then a simple make install will install 
asterisk AND mpg123 in one smooth motion. 

-josh
Richard wrote:
Thanks Matthew,
You are the MAN! It fixed the problem.
Richard
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 3:43 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] moh
My solution to this (as the debian package appears to actually download
mpg321 (instead of mpg123) when you install *, was to download mpg123
from the original website and compile/install it myself.
http://www.mpg123.de/
mpg123 0.59r is the version im now running (just copied the executable
over mpg123 and mpg321 and restarted asterisk (and killed dead looking
mpg321 processes) started up astersik, caleld myself and shoved myself
on hold, and VOILA, music on hold is working normally and not running
'really' slow
Hope this helps!
Richard wrote:
   

Hi,
I have * 1.0.0. Everything works well except moh.
I followed the instruction in
http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+musiconhold.conf. I use the
default mp3 from *.
The problem is that the music is really slow. Seems like it didn't get
 

the
   

right rate to play.
Any one having this problem too?
Thanks,
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] How to submit a patch?

2004-10-28 Thread Josh Roberson
Renato Mintz wrote:
Josh, please help me as I'm really naive to this process. Is there a
specific text you would like to see in the disclaimer? Where should I
send this disclaimer file to?
Tks,
Renato
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:08:35 -0500, Josh Roberson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Just so everyone's clear on the patch submission etiquette here...
(sorry for the crosspost, but I believe this is relevant to both
users/dev lists)
   

--SNIP--
If you read the etiquette, http://www.digium.com/bugguidelines.html , 
you will see that there are two versions of a disclaimer that need to be 
filled out, signed, and either faxed or mailed to digium for patch 
submission.  I was just posting a few key problem points from this 
etiquette to clear things up a bit.

-Josh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Type of T1 for T100P card

2004-10-27 Thread Josh Roberson
Cirelle Enterprises wrote:
- Original Message - 
From: Pedro Aguayo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Type of T1 for T100P card

| I'm currently setting up a PBX system using the T100P card, and was 
| wondering if it can handle the 2-way trunk type of T1s. Do 2-way trunk 
| T1s use RBS signaling?
| Please excuse my ignorance, I have mostly dealt with PRI B and D channel 
| type of T1s.
| 
| Thanks
| 
| Pedro

I found out by taking the long way around, the t100p requires the t1 pri
hybrid isdn bchan, dchan  A standard 24 timeslot t1 will not work.
regards
greg
 

I apologize if i'm not understanding exactly wtf you're saying here, but 
if i'm reading this correctly, I COMPLETELY disagree.

I have MANY instances of t100p's on a normal 24 channel t1 (rbs),  and a 
few on PRI's using standard B and D channels. It will work fine as long 
as it's configured properly.

-Josh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] How to submit a patch?

2004-10-25 Thread Josh Roberson
Just so everyone's clear on the patch submission etiquette here...
(sorry for the crosspost, but I believe this is relevant to both 
users/dev lists)

To submit a patch, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE help us out by doing the following:
Search the bugtracker to see if someone has already submitted a 
patch/request/bug that may be relevant to your patch.  If so, please use 
the existing bug, and follow the relevant sections below.  If not, 
please follow the following guidelines:

1)  make sure you save your patch in a unified diff, based on 
stable/head cvs if possible.  (cvs diff -u path/to/file.c [within the 
asterisk source tree will keep you from having to have two copies of the 
source file, too]) and save it into a file ending in a .txt extension 
(for faster review by us bug marshals, and Mark.

2) make sure you add the header [patch] without quotes to the 
subject/summary field.  This will help us quickly identify your bug as a 
patch, and will once again, help speed up the process.

3) please refrain from using whitespaces instead of tabs within your 
patch, also, please try not to add any unnecessary whitespace. 

and last but not least
4) if you don't already have a disclaimer on file, please file one.  
Once filed, PLEASE mention somewhere in your bug that you have one on 
file.  This saves a lot of time, and has held back lots of good patches, 
because the powers that be have to ask, then wait on a response as to 
wether or not the patch has been properly disclaimed.

Thanks for listening!
Kevin Walsh wrote:
I've found some problems in the implementation of say_number for
portuguese and I have some corrections that I would like to submit to be
incorporated to the CVS. 

How do I do that? Is there any place where this process is already
written? Or can someone explain to me?
My feeling is that I should first open a bug at Mantis describing the
problem I found and attaching my patch. Then what?
   

That's all.  As you said, you just need to open a bug report and attach
your patch.  The report and patch will be evaluated at some point and
might make it into CVS if it corrects an identifiable problem or provides
a new/enhanced feature.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: phone line roaming

2004-09-15 Thread Josh Roberson
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:15:24 +0200, Pavel Jezek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

thanks for idea, but this is not exactly what I need,
   

It wasn't supposed to be *exactly* what you need ;-) That's not what a
mailing list is about. We can give each other clues and ideas for how
things can be done *in principle*, elaboration and implementation is
up to whoever wants the feature requested.
 

assume: one employee working in office (open-space cubes),
when this employee leave the work, on the same place come another employee
so that, I can't ring both lines and can't use bluetooth device :(
I thing to do some login to phone  asterisk and download appropriate extension/phone line
according to e.g. username/login id,
   

Yes, that's a good thought to elaborate on.
 

but how to configure/implement?
   

The easiest way in terms of both implementation and use is probably to
use the dialplan and some extensions to trigger the login/logoff
For example, you could use *21 and *22 as a prefix to login and
logoff, then use DBput/DBget and the built in database to determine
the state of a virtual extension.
*212000 would tell Asterisk that extension 2000 is now on the device
from which this was dialled.
*222000 would tell Asterisk to cancel the previous state.
You'd maintain a database entry for each virtual extension (or user
depending on your) which would be your key. Then when somebody dials
*21 for that virtual extension, you check the phone it was coming
from and that is going to be your value for this key.
something along the lines of ...
exten = _*21,1,DBput(VIRTUAL${EXTEN:3}/physical={CALLERIDNUM})
but ideally you'd want to use something other than CALLERIDNUM to
identify the physical device.
All you have to do then is check for each incoming call whether there
is a value stored in the key for the virtual extension in question and
if there is send the call to the phone associated with that value.
Once you've got this basic functionality working, You can make it more
fancy with such things as PIN numbers, automatic cancelling of a value
if the user signs in again on another phone, timeouts taking into
account office hours etc etc etc.
And if you have done all this, don't forget to share and post the code
on the Wiki ;-)
rgds
benjk
 

benjk, pavel,
I have had something similar to this i made long ago.  There are a 
couple downfalls, as MWI doesn't work, but all in all, it works great.

http://www.indigent-networks.com/asterisk/roaming.txt
Also note, this is just an EXAMPLE.  I claim no usability for it, even 
though it does work ;)

-twisted
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dialing pstn-asterisk

2004-09-09 Thread Josh Roberson
I see your problem, unless you point out this is already the case:
Matthias Leeb wrote:
Hello list
When i'm trying to dial into our pstn the following errors occure:
-- Executing Dial(SIP/snomsip-dbd0, /2100) in new stack Sep  9 10:02:22
WARNING[59409]: channel.c:1901 ast_request: No channel type registered for
''
Sep  9 10:02:22 NOTICE[59409]: app_dial.c:715 dial_exec: Unable to create
channel of type ''
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
   -- Executing Congestion(SIP/snomsip-dbd0, ) in new stack
 == Spawn extension (default, 02100, 2) exited non-zero on
'SIP/snomsip-dbd0'
 

- snip -
extensions.conf should be setup something like this:
Everything seems to be allright. Here is a part of my extensions.conf:
 

; all hard set variables need to be in global
[global]
CONSOLE=Console/dsp
TRUNK=Zap/g1
; sip phones set into context=default in sip.conf, for example.
[default]
ignorepat = 0
exten = _0.,1, Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:1})
exten = _0.,2,Congestion
Has anybody got some hints for me?
Beste regards 

matthias
 

Try that, it should work.
-twisted
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cepstral

2004-09-09 Thread Josh Roberson
I wrote cepstral regarding this at the beginning of the week, thought it 
might be relevant to post the reply:
Thanks for contacting us. Our Linux package is off the site right now
because we are releasing a new version, 3.02, next week. This is an
incremental release. The major update of this version is a new Linux SDK.

Please check back with us in 6-7 days and we should have what you're looking
for.
We appreciate your patience.
 -Craig 


Now hopefully, they'll hold up to it and release the new Linux SDK in a 
week or so...
-twisted

Shane Young wrote:
Quoting Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 

Cepstral offers Linux versions.
Just contact them.
http://www.cepstral.com/cgi-bin/downloads?page=voices
   

Note that you can not download any Linux versions from that page. 

They changed something a while back.  Released a new TTS engine for Windows and Windows CE, but 
have not as of yet released it for Linux.

 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] [patch] allow the transfer keys from app_dial's 't' and 'T' and hangup key 'H' to be configured via features.conf

2004-09-06 Thread Josh Roberson
Roger,
   at no point did I say I was finished with this patch.   I did get a 
little frustrated early on in the development.   Currently this patch is 
broken due to recent changes in cvs, and I'm about to tag it with a 
post-1.0 tag in the bugtracker since there seems to be lots of interest 
in it's existance, but it needs a little work.   Please do not make 
assumptions as you have below,   because I am the author of this patch, 
and I do *NOT* feel as though i'm finished, nor did i say so anywhere in 
the bugnotes.

Thanks.
twisted
box100 wrote:
Can anyone tell me how I can implement the features added in the 
following link for call transfer? The authors seem to feel they are 
finished but it doesn't appear to have been integrated into what 
everyone can download. It is referred to as a patch but I don't 
understand how it could be applied. Here is the link:
 
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002010
 
I guess I just don't understand how to apply patches
 
Thanks in advance,
Roger Easlick


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] [patch] allow the transfer keys from app_dial's't' and 'T' and hangup key 'H' to be configured via features.conf

2004-09-06 Thread Josh Roberson
Yeah, sorry i kinda jumped the gun on ya there..I plan to update it 
again pretty soon, but just for future reference, they normal method to 
apply a patch would be to use the patch command, as follows:

patch -p0  patch.txt
usually this is done from the top-level source directory for the package 
you are trying to patch, replacing patch.txt with the name of the diff 
(patch).   Sometimes patch makers don't use paths in their patch, so you 
kinda have to know where the files are that you're trying to patch, but 
i try to make mine all work against the top-level source directory.

twisted
box100 wrote:
Wow, you guys are fast. My apologies, twisted. I realize there must have been a reason why it 
wasn't marked resolved and included in the CVS HEAD, but I was under the impression 
that those who wanted to and have the knowhow could download and apply the patch. Didn't mean to 
imply you or anyone else *stated* that it was finished, it just seemed from the dialog in the 
bug report that work on it had been completed and just not marked as such. My mistake.
It will be great when it is done whenever that happens since the added functionality 
really will increase the usefulness of Asterisk as a PBX.
Thanks for the speedy reply.
Roger

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Josh Roberson
Sent: Tue 9/7/2004 00:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] [patch] allow the transfer keys from app_dial's't' and 
'T' and hangup key 'H' to be configured via features.conf

Roger,
   at no point did I say I was finished with this patch.   I did get a
little frustrated early on in the development.   Currently this patch is
broken due to recent changes in cvs, and I'm about to tag it with a
post-1.0 tag in the bugtracker since there seems to be lots of interest
in it's existance, but it needs a little work.   Please do not make
assumptions as you have below,   because I am the author of this patch,
and I do *NOT* feel as though i'm finished, nor did i say so anywhere in
the bugnotes.
Thanks.
twisted
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ex-girlfriend logic not working in latest CVS?

2004-08-24 Thread Josh Roberson
Maybe it's just me, but it looks as if you have one too many X's in  
your pattern matching..

615NXX is all you need, i see 615NXXX.  Same for 931.
-twisted
James Sizemore wrote:
Ex-girlfriend logic not working in latest CVS?
Incoming sip calls don't work. Anyone else seen this
problem?
Extension logic looks good:
exten = 6153248305/_931NXXX,1,Queue(queue1);
exten = 6153248305/_615NXXX,1,Queue(queue2);
;exten = 6153248305,1,Queue(queue3);
show dialplan looks good:
-- Added extension '6153248305' priority 1 (CID match 
'_931NXXX')to vantage
-- Added extension '6153248305' priority 1 (CID match 
'_615NXXX')to vantage

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Blocking the 'Do Not Call List

2004-08-10 Thread Josh Roberson
Chris,   While you are thinking logically, This will just as 
un-effective as putting them all in the dialplan, as the DBGet() and 
DBPut() functionality deals with the internal astdb (db1 database). 

I would reccomend going the AGI route at this time, until we have better 
functionality for DB handling.

-Josh
Chris Shaw wrote:
Why use AGI? Why not just use the builtin DBGet() and DBPut() functions in
*?
   -Chris
- Original Message -
From: drodden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:22 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Blocking the 'Do Not Call List
 

Anybody have any experience with blocking numbers in the U.S's Do Not
Call list?
We have a customer that will be getting their own Asterisk server from
us, and they want it to be check outbound numbers against the do not
call list; this is for a backup, in case there's a slip up and one of
their people try to dial somebody on the do not call list.
The list has millions of numbers, and I don't think the extensions.conf
file could handle me listing all million+ phone numbers and making it
play a sound like That number is on the do not call list, and then
creating a _NXXNXXNXXX extension at the very bottom. The list would take
up all it's memory. Anybody have a more elegant solution? Maybe an AGI
script to match the outbound phone number against a column in a table in
a MySQL database? Is there something similar already written that I can
just modify?
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] AbsoluteTimeout Inside A Macro

2004-08-10 Thread Josh Roberson
Absolute timeout is 'T', and your standard timeout is 't'.  If he's 
looking for absolute timeout, he is, indeed, looking for the T extension.

They are case sensitive, and should work. 

Mr. Wade:  Have you tried using the T extension outside of the macro?  
Although it *SHOULD* work within the macro, we may have stumbled upon a 
bug..

-Josh
Chris Shaw wrote:
For one thing it's 't' not 'T', just like invalid is 'i' not 'I'
   -Chris
- Original Message -
From: Christopher L. Wade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AbsoluteTimeout Inside A Macro
 

Christopher L. Wade wrote:
   

Hi all,
Is it just me and not reading the docs right, or has anybody else had
problems with the AbsoluteTimeout application and the 'T' extension when
used inside a macro?
[macro-attended]
; ARG1 is the device to dial out on, SIP or Zap, or whatever
; ARG2 is the extension to dial using 'attended' dialing
exten = s,1,AbsoluteTimeout(30)
exten = s,2,AGI(attended-extension,${ARG1},${ARG2})
; attended-extension takes a device string and an extension
; and builds a dial string according to some crazy internal logic
exten = s,3,Dial(${DIALSTRING},5,t)
exten = s,4,Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS},1)
exten = s-NOANSWER,1,Goto(s,1)
exten = T,1,NoOp(i got here here)
exten = T,2,Goto(s,1)
The purpose of this macro is to be able to say something like
exten = _8XX,1,Macro(attended,SIP,${EXTEN})
and have the the dialed extension rung, then, if no answer within 5
seconds, have the dialed extension plus an 'attendant' for that
extension rung, (etc. etc. etc.).  If nobody answers after 30 seconds,
the caller is (read 'will be') offered the chance to leave a voicemail,
otherwise re-enter the loop, ringing the 'full' attendant list for the
requested extension.
When I test this, everything works according to plan, except when
AbsoluteTimeout expires, my T extension inside the macro is not
executed, the call is simply hungup.  What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

Anybody?
Right now I'm considering doing this inside an AGI app, but I don't like
the way Dial is 'blocking' (AGI or not).  I guess I could use chan_local
in my dial string inside the AGI to make it 'fork' but that just creates
a whole new ball of ear wax to deal with. :(
This 'bug' seams strange though, because I've seen examples that, at
least to my eyes, appear exactly the same as my above code.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 'no authority found' problem

2004-08-04 Thread Josh Roberson
Simon, i was having the exact same problem, the only solution I found, 
was to remove the secret, then it worked great.. I thought I must have 
been missing something too, but apparently not.   I'm not sure exactly 
what is causing this, as if i set the servers up to register with each 
other, they register fine, but the moment they try to pass a call to one 
another, they fail, unless there is no secret listed in iax.conf for the 
connections.

-twisted
Simon Ward wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm having some problem trying to set up an IAX connection between two 
* servers.
The scenario is :
serverA has an X100p card and will direct all calls from the X100p 
over IAX to a specific extension on serverB which is at the other end 
of an unfirewalled VPN connection.

At the moment serverA tries to redirect the call to serverB but 
recieves this message (it appears on both servers) :

-- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff) 
in new stack
-- Called test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: 
NEW
   Timestamp: 6ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 0 [192.168.1.250:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : cardiff
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: test
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65283
   ADSICPE : 2
   DATE TIME   : 151287361

Rx-Frame Retry[No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: 
REJECT
   Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
   CAUSE   : No authority found

Aug  4 14:50:02 WARNING[147465]: chan_iax2.c:5339 socket_read: Call 
rejected
by 192.168.1.250: No authority found
Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: 
ACK
   Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
-- Hungup 'IAX2/192.168.1.250:4569/1'
  == No one is available to answer at this time

Here are excerpts from the config files :

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playback doesn't work whith h323

2004-08-04 Thread Josh Roberson
Steve Szmidt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 09:29 pm, Seth Remington wrote:
 

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 20:29, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
   

M. Willigs wrote:
 

Hi Jeremy
My entry in the extensions.conf is like this:
exten = 011001,1,Playback(tt-monkey)
I didn't asociate the cmd Dial whit this entry, so, I can't answer the
line
   

You are not answering the line and that extension looks weird to me.

Jeremy McNamara
 

exten = 011001,1,Answer
exten = 011001,2,Playback(tt-monkey)
-Seth
   

Crikey, what kind of extension is That!?
Ten digits long?!!
- -- 
Steve
 

well... my first glance told me that tt-monkey doesn't exist... it's 
tt-monkeys.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] features.conf

2004-08-03 Thread Josh Roberson
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Chris Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Not in configs or /etc/asterisk/. Asterisk is still running, just
curious why I am not seeing that file.
 

Hmmm.. Maybe try checking out a fresh new copy in a different dir? It's
been in there for over a week now, I just checked out a new copy and it's
in there... 

   

Or simply rename musiconhold.conf as features.com and restart Asterisk.
 

no.. WRONG.   rename parking.conf, as parking.conf is what features.conf 
is derived from.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] features.conf

2004-08-03 Thread Josh Roberson
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Josh Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

no.. WRONG.   rename parking.conf, as parking.conf is what features.conf
   

Oops.  I knew it was one of them.  At least I didn't say sip.conf :-)
 

True that.   This is another reminder that everyone needs to make sure 
that when they update, they check all of the files in the configs/ path 
in the src tree to see what's changed.  Also, if you're confused about 
why something that's supposed to be in cvs isn't, a good method would 
be to make clean; make update; make install.  If that still doesn't cure 
it, blow away the source tree and start with a new checkout.

Just a friendly reminder to the list.
twisted
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 to IAX2...i'm obviously an idiot!!

2004-07-26 Thread Josh Roberson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I'm trying to get two Asterisk servers to talk to each other using IAX(2).
I've read the WiKi and the docs and tried the examples.
 

You sure?
I can't get it to work (I have 2 x 7960's registering on one server and 1 x 7960 
registering on the other).
I've set them up as follows...
The two servers are set up as friends and have consecutive IP address's.
The setup is that the prefix 3 determines that the server dials the extension number 
on the other servers local context:-
extensions.conf
exten = _3,1,Dial(IAX2/OtherServer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5036/${EXTEN:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED])
 

5036 is not IAX2.  That's abundantly clear in the wiki and the 
examples.  4569 is the port you are looking for.

When I do a dial say 32221 this is what comes up in the console:-
Executing GoTo(SIP/2231-, intern-post|32221|1) in new stack
GoTo (intern-post,32221,1)
Executing Dial(SIP/2231-, IAX2/OtherServer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5036/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]) in new stack
Called OtherServer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5036/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warning: chan_iax2.c:1413 attempt_transmit: Max retries exceeded to host OtherServerIP 
on IAX2/OtherServerIP:5036/3 (type = 6, subclass = 1, ts=2, seqno=0)
Hungup 'IAX2/OtherServerIP:5036/3'
then the regular cleanup commands
In IAX2 Show Peers I get:-
OtherServerOtherServerIP(S)  255.255.255.255   4569UnMonitored
 

it even tells you this right here...
I'm confused
why is the connection showing on port 4569 in show peers?  Is this a default?
 

*nods*
Is there a way to test the validity of the IAX2 connection from the console?
Thanks in advance.
P
 

-twisted
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Parking renamed to feature in 7/17/04 CVS

2004-07-17 Thread Josh Roberson
Seth Remington wrote:
I just updated from CVS and noticed that Mark has renamed all of the
parking related files (parking.conf, parking.h, res_parking.c) to
features.conf, features.h, res_features.c respectively. The CVS log
mentions that this is in preparation for some more (possibly post 1.0)
feature additions.
The header file still #define(s) _PARKING_H though so let the confusion
ensue ;)
Time to update the wiki.
-Seth
 

Actually, no, that was fixed also.
-twisted
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy

2004-05-19 Thread Josh Roberson
Hi florian..
Florian Overkamp wrote:
Hi,
 

-Original Message-
   

- Sometimes a call won't go through, dialtone stays on after 
 

keypresses.
   

Strange. A powercycle of the iaxy usually helps
 

Are you changing which phone is plugged into the iaxy before 
this happens?  The changing of resistance levels I have 
noticed to cause this occasionally.
   

Nope, no changes in the phone connection.
By the way, what does this mean:
   -- Accepted AUTHENTICATED TBD call from ip
 

that means that the iaxy has authenticated to * to make a call, but has 
not yet sent digits.  This is normal activity.

- No support for hookflash transfers (will this be possible ??)

 

There is most definately support for flashhook transfers.  
Hit Flash, then #, then dial the number you're' transferring 
to.  I've done this for awhile now, and it works fine.
   

Can you show your IAXy provisioning config ? This doesn't do anything with
my setup.
 

The provisioning config has nothing to do with this.
Make sure you're running revision 14 of the firmware.  type 
iax2 show firmware from the cli to see which firmware you 
have on your asterisk 
system.If it's not the latest, i reccomend doing a cvs update to 
latest -HEAD .  If you're not running HEAD this is futile.  
Also, to see which version of firmware you have on the iaxy, 
do an iax2 debug, and watch for the iaxy's talk, it will tell 
you what firmware revision it's running.
   

I did, and I can confirm the IAXy is running version 14.
Florian
 

Okay.I'm not sure what to say then... I've been using an IAXy now 
since the first batch was done, and it works exactly as I described. 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy

2004-05-14 Thread Josh Roberson
Okay.. here's the scoop

I love the little blue boxes in the sense that it just works. Disadvantages
as I have seen them these few days:
- American tones only ? (or I just don't know how to change them)
 

As far as I can tell this is true.

- Sometimes a call won't go through, dialtone stays on after keypresses.
Strange. A powercycle of the iaxy usually helps
 

Are you changing which phone is plugged into the iaxy before this 
happens?  The changing of resistance levels I have noticed to cause this 
occasionally.

- No support for hookflash transfers (will this be possible ??)

 

There is most definately support for flashhook transfers.  Hit Flash, 
then #, then dial the number you're' transferring to.  I've done this 
for awhile now, and it works fine.

Florian

 

Make sure you're running revision 14 of the firmware.  type iax2 show 
firmware from the cli to see which firmware you have on your asterisk 
system.If it's not the latest, i reccomend doing a cvs update to 
latest -HEAD .  If you're not running HEAD this is futile.  Also, to see 
which version of firmware you have on the iaxy, do an iax2 debug, and 
watch for the iaxy's talk, it will tell you what firmware revision it's 
running.

--Josh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] BugTracker Information - REPOST

2004-04-25 Thread Josh Roberson
All,

   As a bug marshal, I have noticed quite a few bugs that seem to get 
overlooked/ignored due to the fact that they do not have the appropriate 
information in the bug information fields, or bugnotes.  I am, 
therefore, Reposting an old post from July 26th, 2003, to help clarify 
the use of the Bugtracker.  Sorry if you have read it before; this is 
just an attempt to re-familiarize everyone with the information that 
should be included in the posts, which should help speed things along.

Thank you for your time, and attention.
twisted
ORIGIONAL POST
From: Mark Spencer
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Bug Tracker Official Launch
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:48:14 -0500 (CDT)
ANNOUNCEMENT: Bug Tracker/Feature Request System

http://bugs.digium.com/

Digium has introduced a bug tracking and feature request system for
Asterisk developers and users.  Due to the increased traffic on the
mailing list, and an inadequate number of hours in the day to parse
it, it has been decided that a more meaningful method of tracking
bugs, features, and patches had to be implemented.
The Asterisk developers pledge to do their best update and keep the bug
tracking system up to date so long as the users choose to utilize it
adequately.  We would encourage people from this point forward to log
their bugs and features in this system.  Simply sending things to the list
is insufficient notification for bug repair and tracking.  Unless
submitted to the bug tracker, there are no guarantees that your bugs are
even read, much less worked on.  (No guarantees if they are in the bug
tracker that they will be repaired, either, but they will be read and
examined.)
If you're a developer looking for a project, the bug tracker represents a
good place to start looking.  When you send patches to implement features
and fix bugs, be sure to referenche what bugs they fix (or features they
implement).
BUGS:
  Before submitting a bug into the system, make sure you have the
following information to submit:
  - your CVS date (show version)
  - your operating system and revision (uname -a)
  - your hardware configuration, if relevant (all cards and their configs)
  - your VoIP environment (SIP phones? H.323?  MGCP?)
  - if a corefile has been produced, please have a backtrace
   gdb /usr/sbin/asterisk /path/to/corefile.1234
   then type bt and include the output
  - include copies of relevant configuration files
  - full console error messages
  - debug traces (asterisk -vgcd) if applicable
  - WITHOUT ENOUGH DATA, YOUR BUG REPORT WILL BE REJECTED OR IGNORED
  What is a bug?  A bug is something that causes unexpected adverse
effects, contrary to what the stated or understood meaning of the
program intended.  A bug can be non-adherence to an RFC specification
that causes conflict with other packages in a specific command set.
A bug is a typo or syntax error in code.  A bug can be an example in
the documentation that does the opposite of what was intended.
  What is not a bug?  Anything that adds functionality past what was
intended in the code is a feature, and should be requested as such.
Clarification of documentation or comments in code, extension of a
protocol to include additional functionality, or support for a
different model or card would all be features.
FEATURES
   There are many features and requests that are made of the system.
Please be as clear as you can as to what the feature is that you
need, and why it should be given priority over other features
currently in the queue.  The developers will examine all feature
requests, and at their discretion some may be implemented.
   Of course, if you supply code to implement the feature, it will be
much more likely that it will be integrated into the codebase.  See
license section, below this text.
LICENSE
   Please be aware that the Asterisk project, while Open Source under
GPL, code and patches which are contributed for distribution with core
Asterisk have additional requirements beyond the GPL.  In order to prevent
even the slightest possibility that a lawsuit could be brought against
Digium (the primary sponsor, and holder of the copyright,) it is required
that ALL patches and feature submitters have signed a waiver on the code
that they submit.
   Before ANY patch is applied, you MUST sign and return either of the
following document by fax, snail mail. Email only is unacceptable for
legal reasons.
http://www.digium.com/disclaimer.txt
http://www.digium.com/disclaim.changes
Personally, I'd like to thank everyone who has participated in fixing bugs
and adding features.  It's largly thanks to the feedback and assistance
from the community that Asterisk has managed to become so powerful in such
a short amount of time.
Mark

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  

RE: [Asterisk-Users] STOP THIS THREAD New to asterisk? RUN... don't walk.

2004-01-04 Thread Josh Roberson
I agree in stopping the thread, but I do have one question... What would
Qwest think of her posting to the list under a yahoo mail account
representing her company, badmouthing this community, who, in the long
run, could be VERY much worth their interest?

Hmm Just my $.02 - no flames please. 

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Balaji NJL
 Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] STOP THIS THREAD New to asterisk? RUN...
 don't walk.
 
 Hi All,
 
 Can we stop this thread pl. This lady has no
 intentions to learn asterisk.
 She is just a troll and wasting our time. With her
 corporate attitude, what
 she expects is support that available with paid
 commercial products. Her
 company has enough money to buy commercial products,
 let she go there. Hey
 lady, whoever u are, dont waste our time. this is not
 for u.
 
 Lets move on to something useful pl.
 -B
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 5:36 PM
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] New to asterisk? RUN...
 don't walk.
 
 
  On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 14:12, Me wrote:
   Mr. West,
  
   Sorry to burst your bubble, but that is not me.
 My
   name is Barbara Simpson.  Either you are lying or
   someone is trying to remove any credibility from
 my
   original post.  I now stand by my original post
 with
   more conviction than ever.
 
  You had little to no credibility when you show up
 acting like a troll
  from what most people would consider a throw away
 account.
 
   There were a lot of insightful replies.  However,
 none
   of them were able to address the real problems of
 the
   asterisk community and come up with solutions.  If
 you
   can't see your own faults, you are in for a bumpy
   ride.
 
  This is due to the problem residing in the general
 population, not the
  community. The problem resides in users who can't be
 bothered to either
  expend energy, or patience for the software to
 develop. Remember you
  came here, we didn't go recruiting you. So if you
 are disappointed in
  your experience, blame yourself for your
 expectations. As far as I can
  tell here, you haven't paid a single person for
 anything, so any help
  you have received has been at a cost to the other
 people of this
  community.
 
  So the solution is for you to grow up. You need to
 learn that the
  comment you have made in this thread are worthless
 as they don't advance
  anything here. If you want credibility in a
 technical forum, you will
  have to show some technical skills. Otherwise you
 will be cast aside and
  hopefully ignored.
 
   Barbara Simpson
   Qwest Voice Over Packet Services
  
   --- Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said it good Look what this person
 posted to
my blog... Now thats
what I call grown up.
   
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 10:10:24 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
IP Address: 24.10.200.168
Name: Jeff Sowery
Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:
   
Comments:
   
You're a complete idiot.  Grow a brain or at
 least
some balls.
   
-Jeff
   
   
NEXT!!!
   
bkw
   
   
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, JR Richardson wrote:
   
 Piping in 2 cents,

 This is a great example of the Internet, Fast
 Food
generation, showing their
 appreciation for all the magic that happens in
 the
labs, hearts and minds of
 the courageous, hard working, dedicated and
motivated group of people truly
 interested and guided to accomplish greatness.

 This platform for learning is one of the best
tools in existence to come to
 a finite understanding of VoIP and legacy
telephony with the versatility to
 expand beyond and develop originality in the
 field
of telecommunications
 excellence, product development.  Learn it,
understand it, appreciate it,
 then take it past where you found it and if
 you're
capable contribute, if
 not, enjoy it.  But always, always maintain
respect for those who created it
 and continue to refine it.

 Learning is intrinsically human, and in this
 world
of Industry (There is no
 substitution for knowledge. [Edward Deming]).
Find your inner child,
 re-capture and embrace what God has given you,
 the
ability to learn.  It
 will require you to put down the remote
 control,
get off the couch and
 decrease your apparently frequent visits to
McDonalds.  Search and find the
 knowledge which you seek to ultimately fulfill
your destiny; build an
 Asterisk Server that works.

 Hell, we all did.

 JR






  Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
  From: Me [EMAIL

RE: [Asterisk-Users] STOP THIS THREAD New to asterisk? RUN... don't walk.

2004-01-04 Thread Josh Roberson
I agree in stopping the thread, but I do have one question... What would
Qwest think of her posting to the list under a yahoo mail account
representing her company, badmouthing this community, who, in the long
run, could be VERY much worth their interest?


Hmm Just my $.02 - no flames please. 

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Balaji NJL
 Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:31 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] STOP THIS THREAD New to asterisk? RUN...
 don't walk.
 
 Hi All,
 
 Can we stop this thread pl. This lady has no
 intentions to learn asterisk.
 She is just a troll and wasting our time. With her
 corporate attitude, what
 she expects is support that available with paid
 commercial products. Her
 company has enough money to buy commercial products,
 let she go there. Hey
 lady, whoever u are, dont waste our time. this is not
 for u.
 
 Lets move on to something useful pl.
 -B
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 5:36 PM
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] New to asterisk? RUN...
 don't walk.
 
 
  On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 14:12, Me wrote:
   Mr. West,
  
   Sorry to burst your bubble, but that is not me.
 My
   name is Barbara Simpson.  Either you are lying or
   someone is trying to remove any credibility from
 my
   original post.  I now stand by my original post
 with
   more conviction than ever.
 
  You had little to no credibility when you show up
 acting like a troll
  from what most people would consider a throw away
 account.
 
   There were a lot of insightful replies.  However,
 none
   of them were able to address the real problems of
 the
   asterisk community and come up with solutions.  If
 you
   can't see your own faults, you are in for a bumpy
   ride.
 
  This is due to the problem residing in the general
 population, not the
  community. The problem resides in users who can't be
 bothered to either
  expend energy, or patience for the software to
 develop. Remember you
  came here, we didn't go recruiting you. So if you
 are disappointed in
  your experience, blame yourself for your
 expectations. As far as I can
  tell here, you haven't paid a single person for
 anything, so any help
  you have received has been at a cost to the other
 people of this
  community.
 
  So the solution is for you to grow up. You need to
 learn that the
  comment you have made in this thread are worthless
 as they don't advance
  anything here. If you want credibility in a
 technical forum, you will
  have to show some technical skills. Otherwise you
 will be cast aside and
  hopefully ignored.
 
   Barbara Simpson
   Qwest Voice Over Packet Services
  
   --- Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said it good Look what this person
 posted to
my blog... Now thats
what I call grown up.
   
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 10:10:24 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
IP Address: 24.10.200.168
Name: Jeff Sowery
Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL:
   
Comments:
   
You're a complete idiot.  Grow a brain or at
 least
some balls.
   
-Jeff
   
   
NEXT!!!
   
bkw
   
   
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, JR Richardson wrote:
   
 Piping in 2 cents,

 This is a great example of the Internet, Fast
 Food
generation, showing their
 appreciation for all the magic that happens in
 the
labs, hearts and minds of
 the courageous, hard working, dedicated and
motivated group of people truly
 interested and guided to accomplish greatness.

 This platform for learning is one of the best
tools in existence to come to
 a finite understanding of VoIP and legacy
telephony with the versatility to
 expand beyond and develop originality in the
 field
of telecommunications
 excellence, product development.  Learn it,
understand it, appreciate it,
 then take it past where you found it and if
 you're
capable contribute, if
 not, enjoy it.  But always, always maintain
respect for those who created it
 and continue to refine it.

 Learning is intrinsically human, and in this
 world
of Industry (There is no
 substitution for knowledge. [Edward Deming]).
Find your inner child,
 re-capture and embrace what God has given you,
 the
ability to learn.  It
 will require you to put down the remote
 control,
get off the couch and
 decrease your apparently frequent visits to
McDonalds.  Search and find the
 knowledge which you seek to ultimately fulfill
your destiny; build an
 Asterisk Server that works.

 Hell, we all did.

 JR






  Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
  From: Me [EMAIL

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Grandstream Early Dial

2003-12-31 Thread Josh Roberson
I've never had early dial working, however, I resolved my multiple digit
issue by simply putting both the GS phones and asterisk in INFO mode.
This worked on both 10.0.3.81 firmware on the budgetone and the ATA286,
as well as 10.0.4.30 firmware.  I'm not saying I don't believe you, but
doubelcheck your lines in asterisk to be dtmfmode=info and the gs
devices are on SIP INFO method, and your DTMF Payload type is 101.

Just my $.02

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen R. Besch
 Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:59 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Grandstream Early Dial
 
 
  I've just checked my voicemail with 1.0.4.30 and get the same
multiple
  digits problem. sip.conf and GS config are both at info, for me this
is
  a new problem voicemail has always worked perfectly with the GS.
 
 This has come up many times in this list, with no consensus for a
 solution.  According to Grandstream, the multiple digit problem
arises
 from a difference in the interpretation of the SIP standard. I'm not
 sure I really understand this, so no flames please, but, paraphrasing
a
 conversation I had with GS, apparently they retransmit the digit as
long
 as the key is pressed and expect asterisk to know that it is a
 re-transmission by examining other data in the packet. Asterisk does
not
 handle the SIP packet in the way GS expects, resulting in multiple
digit
 transmission. This flaw (?) is avoided by setting DTMF to INBAND.  Why
 this behaviour is not repeatable on everyones installations escapes
me.
 However, I have noticed one thing that may be a clue. I have one phone
 that is older hardware (redial button instead of send and an unused
 battery compartment on the bottom). This phone behaves differently
than
 all the other, later, models.  For example, it is the only phone on
 which the flash button actually works to answer the alternate line (eg
 when an incoming call waiting call arrives). All phones are using 3.81
 firmware.
 
   Early dial has never worked for me, and I just upgraded to the
   1.0.4.30 load yesterday. Now, I am having DTMF recognition issues,
   making it impossible to check my voice mail.
 
 This is an acknowleged bug on the GS.  They have connected to my *
 server and acknowleged the problem. A fix has been promised but not
yet
 delivered.  Until then, the only solution is to turn early dial off
and
 let the phone send the entire dial string in one packet.  Since this
 does not affect later single digit transmission for IVR's, etc, the
only
 consequence is the irritating delay between the last entered digit and
 the actual placing of the call. But, you can always hit the send key.
 
 Stephen R. Besch
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ---
 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 12/20/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.554 / Virus Database: 346 - Release Date: 12/20/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] New to asterisk? RUN... don't walk.

2003-12-31 Thread Josh Roberson
Well, since everyone else is top-quoting on this message, so will I :P

I'm no veteran either.  As a matter of fact, I have had ZERO prior
knowledge to the telcom industry or more than 'user level' experience
with telecommunications in general.  I decided that I wanted to expand
my knowledge, and actually LEARN a few things, so I jumped into
asterisk.  I was, and quite frankly, IMO, still AM a 'n00b' to *.
However, after playing around, and learning what things do, by reading
the documentation that IS there, searching the archives, and just
trolling the list and IRC, I have learned more in the last 4-5 months of
having * than a lot of people I've noticed have learned in a lifetime of
experience.I now have a fully functional (well, minus MOH, because
mpg123 isn't yet compiled on my new box), * implementation, serving
myself and my roommates strictly over VoIP, and a couple ata's and a
Internet PhoneJack card.  I love it.  And I'm STILL learning to this
date.  

Asterisk is not something you can expect everyone to just drop what
their doing and help you with.  Sure, it can be frustrating, but if you
are so dense that you can't sit down an play with it and learn what
happens when you type something in the cli, or change a few things in
your dialplan, then get out, I agree.  

If you liked taking apart mom's hairdryer as a kid and seeing how it
worked, and then later on, rewired up a few things to do what you wanted
them to, or even took a hex editor to command.com in msdos to change
what it says to suit your taste (mucho guilty on that one.. lol), then
you will have no problem finding out what you can and can't change
simply by editing files, and trying things out. 

Take off your training wheels, and just TRY IT.

- Josh R.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SW
 Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 4:13 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Digium. Com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New to asterisk? RUN... don't walk.
 
 Hello,
 
 I am not a veteran here, but would like to share my thoughts on this
 subject.
 
 True, * is opensource and freely available, but it is not a computer
 program
 that you download and run. It is a very versatile telecommunication
 product
 you would otherwise pay at least 100 K to buy from a telecom vendor,
if
 not
 more based on modules and usage, license hash-codes etc.
 
 Even to try * one would need some pre requisite knowledge in telecom,
if
 not
 many years in the field. I work for a large telecom company and my
 specialty
 is voice over broadband (or xDSL). I worked with asterisk for couple
of
 months now and I am amazed to see areas of telecom that * touch upon
with.
 Starting from Linux, to SIP, H323, DSL technologies (PPP, PPPoE,
PPPoA,
 DHCP, NAT), Call routing(Dial Plan), IVR, Transcoding, STUN are few
areas
 that one would have to master even thinking about *.
 
 True one would know the syntax, and howtos etc, but also would have to
 have
 the ability to troubleshoot. For last two-three months in this list, I
 have
 not seen any newbi posting a sip trace (from a ethereal or a TCP dump)
and
 asking a question about it. I have seen many question for instance,
asking
 syntax of h.323 dial, but never seen a question asked on a h323 trace.
 
 I think, having * openly available is like keeping an airplane openly
 available in a airfield, so that anybody can try flying. Tell me how
many
 of
 us would go try and fly that airplane if we do not know how to fly :)
 
 Point that I want to make here is simple, please try to understand
what *
 is
 all about. If you like it's features and would like it to run in a
 production environment try to get some professional help. If you are
 learning these technologies for fun then get educated, use tools
available
 to troubleshoot. Hooking up couple of phones and making a call is far
from
 knowing *.
 
 Asterisk is a great product (thanks Mark and many others) and if you
know
 what you are doing, you can do wonders with it. Don't put it down,
because
 you do not have the background to understand it or work with it.
 
 Cheers
 
 SW
 
 
 
 Message: 4
 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
 From: Me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] New to asterisk?  RUN... don't walk.
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 As a newcomer to Asterisk, you will not be welcomed
 with open arms.  First, you will find almost no
 documentation on it's features.  Second, if you try to
 ask questions, you will be flamed and pointed to
 worthless how-tos and 'the wiki'.  These worthless
 documents can only be useful for explaining how things
 work to those already in-the-know.  Lastly, Asterisk
 is so bug ridden, expect frequent segmentation faults.
  With a community so 'anti-n00b', don't expect your
 problems to be fixed anytime soon.
 
 RUN!!! Don't walk... away from Aterisk.
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing 

RE: [Asterisk-Users] XBOX as and * Dedicated Server

2003-12-05 Thread Josh Roberson
I have done this, but I haven't put the server in place yet...   It
appears to run absolutely fabulous, with the exception that OSS/dsp is
noisy as all get-out.  Alsa drivers tend to fix this problem, though.
Other than that, I can pass at least 5-10 calls through with no problem
whatsoever.


--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel Cavazos
 Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 6:43 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] XBOX as and * Dedicated Server
 
 Hello guys, i have been on this mailing list for some weeks now, and i
 was wondering if someone here has installed linux on the XBOX and use
it
 as a dedicated server. Its a 200 USD computer and could make it
perfect
 to asterisk, its little and doesnt really take much space. My question
 is could this make it for a stable server???
 
 here are some links i found for linux on XBOX
 http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/
 
 some intresting screenshots found on that URL
 http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/docs/screenshots.html
 
 The only real thing that i dont know is where am i going to put the
 X100p.
 
 Miguel
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ---
 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] XBOX as and * Dedicated Server

2003-12-05 Thread Josh Roberson
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Senad Jordanovic
 Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:18 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] XBOX as and * Dedicated Server
 
 Miguel Cavazos wrote:
  On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 07:13, Steven Critchfield wrote:
 
  During Phreaknic, Mark was showing off a Xbox running asterisk with
4
  S100U interfaces connected to the game ports on the front. It was
  interesting. In the end, I don't think it is cost effective as a
real
  PC since you can also build a PC of similar or better specs for
that
  price now and you get PCI slots.
 
  the S100U is a good idea, and yes you can get a pc for what 30bucks
a
  P200, but i was looking for something small and good looking, i dont
  have a big room and another CPU.
 
  Miguel
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 I like you idea. Very Cool :)
 Is RAM upgradable on xbox?
 
 Thanks
 

Yes the ram is upgradable... *IF* you can do extremely small surface
mount soldering.  You can upgrade it to a whopping 128 megs.


 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] cisco 7960 power suplies?

2003-12-01 Thread Josh Roberson
Also, I see them on eBay all the time for around $35 US.

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lists
 Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 5:49 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] cisco 7960 power suplies?
 
 Does anyone know where to get cisco 7960 power suplies?  What should
they
 cost?
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ---
 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Updated iaxComm binaries available for WinXP, Red Hat 9.0

2003-11-19 Thread Josh Roberson
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Van Donselaar
 Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Updated iaxComm binaries available for
WinXP,
 Red Hat 9.0
 
 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:02:42 +0200, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Tried on WinXP Pro and it loads, but in the background (no window).
 There is something needed from the wxWindows package to just run the
 executable?
 
 Nothing needed from the wxWindows package.  I think it's because it
can't
 find
 the rc directory.
 
 I'm sorry that I didn't put this in the README.  Bad coder.  No donut.
 
 You must run iaxComm from the installation directory beacuse it looks
for
 rc
 files in ${cwd}/rc.
 
 Steve put an error dialog on failure in the CVS sources, but I'm
working
 on a
 better solution.
 
 Please let me know if this solves it, or if the problem lies
elsewhere.

Nope still crashes on XP on load.  Ran from directory extracted to, etc.
Below are crash details:

AppName: iaxcomm.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.0 ModName: iaxcomm.exe
ModVer: 0.0.0.0  Offset: 0008e98c 

Don't know if that helps any at all, but the other details screen is WAY
too long to attach.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.538 / Virus Database: 333 - Release Date: 11/10/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] MeetMe problem

2003-11-15 Thread Josh Roberson
Also, unless something has changed, If you don't have any zap devices,
you'll need to have the ztdummy module loaded to provide zap timing to
the meetme app.

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MeetMe problem

On Saturday 15 November 2003 08:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Hi guys,
 Having a bit of a problem trying to get conference bridges working.
 In my meetme.conf file I have the following line
 [rooms]
 conf = 6000


 In my extensions.conf file I have:
 exten = 1000,1,MeetMe,6000

 My problem is that when I dial into extension 1000 it is telling me
 this is not a valid conference number.  Can anybody telling me what
 I'm doing wrong here?

You need to do a restart after defining new conference numbers,
otherwise they won't work (i.e. not on a reload).

-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.538 / Virus Database: 333 - Release Date: 11/10/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.538 / Virus Database: 333 - Release Date: 11/10/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Graphical Interface

2003-11-14 Thread Josh Roberson









I would like to propose the name astmaster control in
all seriousness. I agree, this isnt a name for an actual possible
business implementation, but I think it has a nice ring to it for a project name.. J



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattf
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 8:57 AM
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Graphical Interface





Hello,











I don't have a project
name yet, any suggestions?





What in your mind should
a full client app have in it?











This program pretty much
has everything that my company needs from a client app in it. What other things
(within the limitations of a Zap/Sip Asterisk system with unmodified source
code) need to be added to it to make it complete?











MATT---





-Original Message-
From: marin blu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003
9:38 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Graphical Interface



Hi,











What is the project name?





Do you thing thatyour project could be a
step to a full client appl ?











Best Regards,





Marin Blu







mattf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Hello,











I have developed a
graphical interface using Perl/TK that has the following features:





I'm still cleaning up the
client code, but it will be released before the end of the month on
Sourceforge. Here are some of the things I have added to the code:

- Recording of any Zap
channel by extension they are connected to at the click of a button
- A refreshing list of active Zap channels
- dialing a number by entering in a number or selecting from a list of recently
dialed numbers and clicking a DIAL button
- Asterisk based conference-calling of up to 6 external channels(even on
single-line phone)
- Admin section that allows you to Hangup any Zap channel at the click of a
button
- Call Parking and retrieval from specific extensions
- Runs on Linux and Windows

On the server side you
will need a MySQL server, a couple AGI scripts and some custom dialplan
extensions, but the Asterisk code itself is unaltered. 

On the Client side you
just need to have perl and Tk/tcl modules installed on Linux and on windows you
just need Activestate perl, you also need to make sure you have the Net:Telnet
and Net::MySQL perl modules loaded on both(these are easy to get and have no
prerequisites).

MATT---





-Original Message-
From: David Winkler
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003
8:42 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Graphical Interface





Hello. Was just curious to know if
anyone is working on a graphical





interface to Asterisk using X
windows, or something else similar.











Thanks!











David















Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with
Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard










---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
 


[Asterisk-Users] I hate to do this but..

2003-11-13 Thread Josh Roberson
I hate to bring this thread back to life, but...

 it may be possible to get it supported, do you think the price
point is remotely competitive with Digium hardware? Also as I am not
about to divulge my information to them to look in the downloads
section, what is the licensing of their SDK? What is the licensing of
the driver? 

Steven

On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:52, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
 Is there any current/planned support for Aculab hardware?
 
http://www.aculab.com
 
 Looks like they have Linux drivers and an SDK.

Has any advancement taken place in this?  Has someone developed a
working channel driver for this product?  I have one, and would like to
see if it would be a possibility to get working...

Thanks

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] grandstream ntp

2003-11-07 Thread Josh Roberson
I've noticed the same problem on the BT-102.  I would also like to know
this... (cc'ed grandstream to get their opinion)

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Rodger
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] grandstream ntp

I am running ntpd on the same machine as asterisk in order for the
grandstream phones to display the time.  After a while the time display
fails until the phone is re-booted.  Has anyone run into this problem
before?  Is it simply a bug in the GS firmware?

Sean



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Beta testers for visual configuration tool for asterisk

2003-10-17 Thread Josh Roberson
I would like to beta test this tool.  :)

Looks like it could be a good thing.

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paulo
Mannheimer
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Beta testers for visual configuration tool for
asterisk

Hi All,

We've been developing for a while an IDE for Asterisk, and the time has
come to open it for beta testers.

You can check at www.instant.com.br/viv.html for a snapshot of the
application. 

Current modules are Dialplan and VoiceMail configuration. As you may
see, it is all-visual, with drag and drop support and integrated sound
recording, saving and cross-checking, so you dialpland doesn't crash
because of a missing sound file.

Beta users will have to download and install either a 16 Mb or a 4Mb
Windows program, depending if you already have or not JRE 1.4.2
installed. This client works together with a tomcat-based application,
which will be running on our servers during the trial.

If you wish to participate, please let me know off-list. I'll get in
touch with the first 5 answers to arrange how the test will be
performed.

Best,

PauloHM

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Ringing from PSTN

2003-10-10 Thread Josh Roberson
Well, the ATA uses SIP to communicate with the * box.  SIP by default
doesn't generate a ringing indicator when the far side is ringing, you
indeed DO have to tell it to ring, using the r flag in the extension.  

**Note, this is just from my experience.

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Dolloff
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Ringing from PSTN

That does make a ringing sound, but any idea what's causing the problem?

Stephen


Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Ringing from PSTN

You can send a fake ring by using something like:

exten = 1234,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],20,r)

Assuming the ATA is in the sip.conf as [1234]

However, this does NOT solve the underlying problem.

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 15:29, Steve Dolloff wrote:
 Here is my Configuration
 
 PSTN - Cisco AS5350 - SIP - ASTERISK - SIP - ATA186
 
 When I call from the pstn to the ATA, the ATA rings but I don't hear
 anything on the calling side until the call is picked up.
 
 When I call from the ATA, everything seems to work fine.
 
 When I bypassed ASTERISK, everything seems to work fine.
 
 Anyone know what I might have configured wrong?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Stephen
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Sample configs and more: http://www.fnords.org/~eric/asterisk/

BTEL Consulting
+1-850-484-4535 x2111 (Pensacola)
+1-504-595-3916 x2111 (New Orleans)
+1-877-677-9643 x2111 (Toll Free)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.522 / Virus Database: 320 - Release Date: 9/29/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] eBay Sip Phone Scam.

2003-10-02 Thread Josh Roberson
Ok, see, now you're confusing what I said.   Nowhere did I say I had the
102D.  I said he never mentioned that it was the 102, irregardless of
the D.  I *DO* have the 101, which is what he was talking about.  No, it
doesn't mention it's the 101. 

This argument has now proved silly, especially since you're confusing
what I'm saying, with what he supposedly is.

*I CLAIM END OF THREAD!*

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of costas 
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] eBay Sip Phone Scam.

Ok, in addition you are confusing the 102 with the 102D. If you had done
your homework you would have noticed that the 102D (see the big D?) is a
different model.

Than one has the 16x2 LCD and 3 way conferencing. I spent a lot of time
studying these phones.

So no, you don't have that phone. check http://www.chagres.net


-- Original Message --
From: Josh Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 2 Oct 2003 07:31:43 -0500

My bad... It's a .net, not a .com :P

Oops... Sorry JMB (sheepish grin)

http://www.chagres.net

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Low, Adam
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] eBay Sip Phone Scam.

Josh,

Pls can you confirm that URL, www.chagres.com doesn't seem to mention
the sale of any Grandstream phones 

Adam

-Original Message-
From: Josh Roberson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02/10/03 13:04
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] eBay Sip Phone Scam.

Actually, had you taken the time to READ the auction details, He says
(direct copy/paste from auction)

-Begin Copy/Paste-


Flash Based OS

Easy to install and manage,
Cost effective,
Easy to use - Friendly GUI for 1st time user,
Easy to learn - User's guide and on-line tutorial

Big information and management LCD blue back light 
User friendly keypad 
Universal AC/DC adapter
Ergonomic design
 
 
  
 
25-button keypad 
12-digit caller ID LCD 
Universal Switching Power Adaptor 
Input: 100-240VAC 
Output: +5VDC, 400mA, 
 1. Auto-sensing 10/100 Base-TX Ethernet Port
2.UL/CE/FCC
3.Power Supply : Universal 90 ~ 264V
  

Support all major Network Operating Systems (Windows, MAC, Linux/Unix) 

Web-Based Management 

TCP/IP Configuration with DHCP support 

Free Flash Firmware update 

No User Licenses 

System Restart/ Shutdown 

Password Access control 

1 x 10/100Mbps Ethernet Port (RJ-45 Interface) 

Support STUN and SIMPLE extension 

Interoperable with 3d parties Proxy, Registrar and gateway products 

 

 
 DSP technology for the best voice quality 

Support popular vocoders including G.723.1 (5.3K/6.3K), G.729A/B, G.711
(alaw 
and u-law), G.726 (40K/32K/24K/16K), as well as G.728 (Model 102D) 

In and out-off-band DTMF 

Support 3-way conferencing (Model 102D), full duplex hands-free
speakerphone, 
redial, call log, volume control, voice mail with indicator 

Support for Layer 2 (802.1Q VLAN, 802.1p) and Layer 3 QoS (ToS,
DiffServ, MPLS) 

Remote software upgrade capability via TFTP 

Support Silence Suppression, VAD (Voice Activity Detection), CNG
(Comfort Noise Generation), Line Echo Cancellation (G.168), and AGC
(Automatic Gain 
Control) 

-End Copy/Paste-

Nowhere does he make the claims you're stating.  He DOES, have (Model
102D) in one of the descriptions, but that is a direct quote from
Grandstream's product brochure.  

Also, this phone *IS* out on the market.. I own one, and I'm quite
happy
with it.. I will tell you this though:

Go order one from Chagres (http://www.chagres.com).   They are an
asterisk supporter/user on this list, and the price is MUCH better. ;)

/rant

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of costas 
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] eBay Sip Phone Scam.

I did shop around. Nowhere does he say the phone is the 101. If you
look
at his ad he says the phone has 102D features and has 16x2 lines and 3
way conference. The starting price was $90. A reasonable opening price
I
thought. He also does not say the phone is not available until end of
year.

I only called Grandstream to find out some info on it after I placed
the
Bid. In a way Grandstream is also at fault. Nowhere do they say the
phone is not available. I was suprised when they told me it wasnt even
out.  When I sent a message to this thief, he said its for the 101 and
they are hard to get. Thats why he jacked up the price. He did cancel
my
bid after telling me what a bad

RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX and IAXTEL

2003-10-02 Thread Josh Roberson
Well, that's odd..  Can you, then, with IAX, determine in which section
(first, second, last, etc...) you read your configuration in iax.conf,
rather than matching up with passwords?

--
Josh Roberson
Indigent Networks
1.877.677.9647 x1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Spencer
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:16 AM
To: ASTERISK USERS
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX and IAXTEL

The location of the guest / iaxtel section having to be at the end
is,
as it turns out, a configuration error on iaxtel.  I hope to have it
straightened out shortly.

Mark

On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Bartosz Jozwiak wrote:

 Sometime yes sometimes no :) But thats the life :)

 Ok but I fixed it. Just put the guest section in iax.conf all the
way on
 the end.
 And right now it works for me. :)

 -- Bart

 - Original Message -
 From: bill black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX and IAXTEL


 Hello Bart:

 Did anyone ever follow up to your question?  I have the same issue.
thanks,
 Bill

 On Wednesday 01 October 2003 07:27, Bartosz Jozwiak wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Could somebody tell me what I should change in iax.conf file to be
able to
  receive calls from iaxtel. I am already registered and I can make
calls to
  IAXtel users but what I should do in iax.conf to be able to receive
call
  also.
 
  -- Bart




 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] CDR Web Search Frontend

2003-09-27 Thread Josh Roberson
Since * and MySQL have had a licensing scuffle, is there a way to set it
up so that we can specify wether or not it's in the mysql database, or
use the plaintext file that * generates with cdr_csv.so?

Just a thought..

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie Carl
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 1:42 AM
To: Asterisk Users (E-mail); Asterisk Dev (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] CDR Web Search Frontend

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
Pro*

Hey all,

New versions available.  Now written in PHP with totals for Billing
Seconds and Duration.

Help yourselves and please send me more suggestions!!!
Thanx!

J

 -Original Message-
 From: Dimitri Bellini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 10:40 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CDR Web Search Frontend
 
 
 *This message was transferred with a trial version of 
 CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
 Hi Carl
   i see web frontend i action is very good!! The total 
 time at end is good 
 thing.
 Thanks for great work. Can you put the script in some place 
 to download. 
 
 Dimitri
 
  *This message was transferred with a trial version of 
 CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
 
  Hey all,
 
  I've just done a quick (but functional) web front end for 
 searching the
  CDRs in a MySQL database.  Anyone interested in trying it out?  I'm
  wondering what to add to it next.
 
  So far you can seach using source, destination, CLI, 
 channel and date
  ranges.  It also displays ALL fields in the database table.
 
  If interested, email me on [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Do not reply 
 directly to
  this email, it will bounce.  Depending on the level of 
 interest, I may
  post this somewhere for your free downloading pleasure.
 
  Regards,
 
  Jamie Carl
  Jazz Inc.
  http://www.jazz-inc.net
  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Phone: +61-414-365466
 
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] CDR Web Search Frontend

2003-09-27 Thread Josh Roberson
You wanted suggestions, didn't you?  Well, you got them! :P

Also another major search function...

Allow to search via account code, for accounting purposes (obviously).



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie Carl
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CDR Web Search Frontend

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
Pro*
Gimmie a break, I only learnt PHP yesterday..
:)

J

- Original Message -
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CDR Web Search Frontend


 *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
Pro*
  Since * and MySQL have had a licensing scuffle, is there a way to
set it
  up so that we can specify wether or not it's in the mysql database,
or
  use the plaintext file that * generates with cdr_csv.so?

 Or do something really smart like the Perl guys and have a
 backend-mostly-independent DB infrastructure.  Hell I think that PHP
 finally smartened up and went this way, too.

 Regards,
 Andrew
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iaxtel and iax.conf

2003-09-23 Thread Josh Roberson
Bkw,

 Yes, and we have documented a bug on it... seems to only happen with
the iaxtel entry, so we're not sure if it's IAXTel that's at fault, or a
bug with * causing iaxtel to read the wrong entry.

http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=296


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] iaxtel and iax.conf

I have tried for over a month off and on to get iaxtel for inbound to
work... and tonight after alot of troubleshooting we noticed this:

iaxtel inbound will use the last entry in your iax.conf to auth against.
So if [iaxtel] is at the top and say [voicepulse] at the bottom.  An
inbound call will try to auth against that [voicepulse] entry even with
the [iaxtel] entry at the top of the file.  Has anyone else seen this
happen?

bkw
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


FW: RE: [Asterisk-Users] iaxtel and iax.conf (HTML CONTENT, FYI)

2003-09-23 Thread Josh Roberson








I hate to post HTML to the list, but I
refuse to respond to this, and I would like to say that whomever
is using this service is kinda stupid for subscribing
an email address to the list using this service.



I hope they learn a lesson by us, the list
users, NOT responding to this, and eventually, after not receiving any list
mail, theyll wonder hmm why is this list so dead?



Just my .02.   



Again, sorry for the html post.



-Original Message-
From: AntiSpam UOL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003
3:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users]
iaxtel and iax.conf




 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
   





Olá,

Você enviou uma mensagem para [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para que sua mensagem seja encaminhada, por favor, clique aqui




   
   

Esta confirmação é necessária
porque [EMAIL PROTECTED] usa o
Antispam UOL, um programa que elimina mensagens enviadas por robôs, como
pornografia, propaganda e correntes.

As
próximas mensagens enviadas para [EMAIL PROTECTED] não precisarão ser
confirmadas*.
*Caso você receba outro pedido de confirmação, por
favor, peça para [EMAIL PROTECTED] incluí-lo em sua lista de autorizados.

 
  
  Atenção! Se
  você não conseguir clicar no atalho acima, acesse este endereço:
  http://tira-teima.as.uol.com.br/challengeSender.html?data="">
  
 



   
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
   





Hi,

You´ve just sent a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In order to confirm the sent message, please click here




   
   

This confirmation is necessary
because [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses
Antispam UOL, a service that avoids unwanted messages like advertising,
pornography, viruses, and spams.

Other
messages sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] won't need to be confirmed*.
*If
you receive another confirmation request, please ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
include you in his/her authorized e-mail list.

 
  
  Warning! If
  the link doesn´t work, please copy the address below and paste it on your
  browser:
  http://tira-teima.as.uol.com.br/challengeSender.html?data="">
  
 



   
  
  
  
 
 
  
  Use o AntiSpam UOL e
  proteja sua caixa postal
  
 





 
  
  
  
 











---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1279 - 16 msgs

2003-09-17 Thread Josh Roberson
This may just be me, but When replying to a message from a digest, it
would be proper to remove all the context except that to which you are
replying so as not to have to scroll an entire mile to see your reply.

I know if I was the person you were replying to, I probably wouldn't
scroll all the way through the other 15 messages just to see a reply.

Just my .02, Sorry if I seem a bit irrational, just irritated.

-Josh

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shimul Kanti
Barua
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1279 - 16
msgs


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:55 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1279 - 16 msgs

BIG OLE SNIP

 Message: 16
 Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:32:32 +0300
 From: Michael Manousos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Organization: inAccess Networks
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk using a h323 gateway
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Cerrajetto wrote:
  Hello:
 
  I am testing Asterisk with oh323.
 
  My question is: can Asterisk route some calls thru a second h323
gateway
(a
  h323 - PSTN gw)?
 
- Asterisk ip: 192.168.1.10
- h323-PSTN gw: 192.168.1.20
 
  I've tried:
 
  exten = _9,1,Dial(OH323/192.1.1.20)
 
  or
 
  exten = _9,1,Dial(OH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

 I guess that 192.1.1.20 is a typo, right?
 You will have to give more info in order to be able to
 find the problem.
 Try to set these params in oh323.conf file:

 wrapLibTraceLevel=3
 libTraceLevel=3
 libTraceFile=/tmp/trace.txt

 Rerun and send me the /tmp/trace.txt file, oh323.conf
 and the screen log (off-list).

 
  but it does not work at all.
 
  If my h323 client directly uses 192.168.1.20 as h323 gateway, the
calls
are
  routed to the PSTN perfectly.
 
  What is the correct way to route some calls from Asterisk to another
h323
  gateway?
 
  Thank you,
  Mark
 


 Michael.

Hi Mark,

Yes, it is possible. I have test it with Asterisk and oh323. We have
routed
some calls thru a second h323 gateway (like Vegastream and Cirilium).
Following is the configuration:


; Vegastream

exten = _01XX,1,Dial(OH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

; Crilium
-
exten = _9XX,1,Dial(OH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED])


Shimul





 --__--__--

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 End of Asterisk-Users Digest



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.515 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/2003
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering answer

2003-09-04 Thread Josh Roberson
Strange.. I had a symbolic link, and it wouldn't work.   After I finally got
it working properly, i even tried to remove it from /usr/bin and symlink it,
and it wouldn't work again... couldn't for the life of me figure out why.


- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Finley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering
answer



 I used a symbolic link and it works just fine for me.

 -Joe


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Roberson
 Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:30 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering
 answer


 Hello Mickey,

I had a similar problem with the mp3 functions a while back, but I
 handled it off list, but since you're having the same issue, here's how I
 noted to fix it:

 1.   Make sure you have mpg123 in /usr/bin.  Symbolic links will NOT work,
 and it has to be the REAL mpg123.

 2.   Make sure that the system has already passed the Answer call for the
 extension. For example:

 exten = 69,1,Wait(5)
 exten = 69,2,Answer
 exten = 69,3,MP3Player,/path/to/music.mp3

 This example is the only way I found to make the mp3 player work.  I
haven't
 been able to test fully the music on hold functionality, as my system
is'nt
 fully functional yet, and I don't have other clients to test with.

 -Josh

 - Original Message - 
 From: Mickey Binder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk maillist (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:13 AM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering
answer


  Hi
 
  I have kind of an odd problem.
  When dialing in from an outside line via a TE410P card it seems like
  MusicOnHold and MP3Player doesn't work properly (for me anyway). The
 remote
  end which is calling * doesn't hear the music but just keeps ringing.
  But
 if
  I insert a Playback(file_which_dont_exist) just before the Moh or
  MP3Player I can hear the music. Actually I observed the same behavior
  internally when I used H323 for my Welltech Wellgates (which I have
  now changed to SIP).
 
  What can cause this kind of problem?
  Its not a huge issue since I can use the Playback to trigger the call,
  but it would be nice to find the source of the problem.
 
  regards
  Mickey Binder
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering answer

2003-09-04 Thread Josh Roberson
Along the same lines, though,  I do agree that MP3Player app should cause
the system to trigger the answer without having to do it manually, but I
could see where you might not want it to, as well.  In theory, the Playback
app  (pardon, this is what i've gathered by toying with it) triggers the
'answer' function if the call is not already answered.  Couldn't we get the
MP3Player app to do the same?   I'm not that skilled of a programmer,
otherwise, I'd hack it up and do it myself.

-Josh

- Original Message - 
From: Mickey Binder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering
answer


  -Original Message-
  From: Joseph Finley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 3. september 2003 23:21
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering
  answer
 
 
 
  I used a symbolic link and it works just fine for me.
 
  -Joe
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Josh Roberson
  Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:30 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering
  answer
 
 
  Hello Mickey,
 
 I had a similar problem with the mp3 functions a while back, but I
  handled it off list, but since you're having the same issue,
  here's how I
  noted to fix it:
 
  1.   Make sure you have mpg123 in /usr/bin.  Symbolic links
  will NOT work,
  and it has to be the REAL mpg123.
 
  2.   Make sure that the system has already passed the Answer
  call for the
  extension. For example:
 
  exten = 69,1,Wait(5)
  exten = 69,2,Answer
  exten = 69,3,MP3Player,/path/to/music.mp3
 
  This example is the only way I found to make the mp3 player
  work.  I haven't
  been able to test fully the music on hold functionality, as
  my system is'nt
  fully functional yet, and I don't have other clients to test with.
 
  -Josh
 Ok I get same results when using Answer, so I'll just stick with that

 thx
 Mickey
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mickey Binder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Asterisk maillist (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:13 AM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not
  triggering answer
 
 
   Hi
  
   I have kind of an odd problem.
   When dialing in from an outside line via a TE410P card it
  seems like
   MusicOnHold and MP3Player doesn't work properly (for me anyway). The
  remote
   end which is calling * doesn't hear the music but just
  keeps ringing.
   But
  if
   I insert a Playback(file_which_dont_exist) just before the Moh or
   MP3Player I can hear the music. Actually I observed the
  same behavior
   internally when I used H323 for my Welltech Wellgates (which I have
   now changed to SIP).
  
   What can cause this kind of problem?
   Its not a huge issue since I can use the Playback to
  trigger the call,
   but it would be nice to find the source of the problem.
  
   regards
   Mickey Binder
  
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering answer

2003-09-03 Thread Josh Roberson
Hello Mickey,

   I had a similar problem with the mp3 functions a while back, but I
handled it off list, but since you're having the same issue, here's how I
noted to fix it:

1.   Make sure you have mpg123 in /usr/bin.  Symbolic links will NOT work,
and it has to be the REAL mpg123.

2.   Make sure that the system has already passed the Answer call for the
extension. For example:

exten = 69,1,Wait(5)
exten = 69,2,Answer
exten = 69,3,MP3Player,/path/to/music.mp3

This example is the only way I found to make the mp3 player work.  I haven't
been able to test fully the music on hold functionality, as my system is'nt
fully functional yet, and I don't have other clients to test with.

-Josh

- Original Message - 
From: Mickey Binder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk maillist (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold and MP3Player not triggering answer


 Hi

 I have kind of an odd problem.
 When dialing in from an outside line via a TE410P card it seems like
 MusicOnHold and MP3Player doesn't work properly (for me anyway). The
remote
 end which is calling * doesn't hear the music but just keeps ringing. But
if
 I insert a Playback(file_which_dont_exist) just before the Moh or
 MP3Player I can hear the music. Actually I observed the same behavior
 internally when I used H323 for my Welltech Wellgates (which I have now
 changed to SIP).

 What can cause this kind of problem?
 Its not a huge issue since I can use the Playback to trigger the call, but
 it would be nice to find the source of the problem.

 regards
 Mickey Binder


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Software from Nero Folk?

2003-09-02 Thread Josh Roberson
I downlaoded it and tried it, SIPPS.  Nice featureful sip client, however, I
haven't been able to get it to pass dtmf to *.   I don't know if this is a
software restriction or not, but I have emailed nero asking them for their
opinion of this, as it is, in my case, a LARGE restriction when trying to
deal with IVR's, and esp. * voicemail.


- Original Message - 
From: Dave Packham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 10:23 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Software from Nero Folk?


 http://www.nero.com/us/631911127302064.html


 Have you all seen this?

 Its a SIP softphone put out by the people that do the CD burning software
Nero...

 Check it out  it works with *

 Dave

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Software from Nero Folk?

2003-09-02 Thread Josh Roberson
Actually, I do have that.  i've tried inband, as well as rfc2883.  Neither
work.  I'm going back and forth with ahead software on the issue, and
they're doing a little bit of looking into it.

Doesn't even work when clicking on the numbers, as required by the software,
as someone else pointed out,  that was an obvious feature i noticed right
off the bat.

-Josh

- Original Message - 
From: Gavin Hollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip Software from Nero Folk?


  haven't been able to get it to pass dtmf to *.   I don't know if this

 Do you have
 dtmfmode=inband
 in sip.conf?

 http://www.sippstar.com/en/631927444894185.html

 Q.: DTMF generated by SIPPS is not recognized by other
   applications.

 SIPPS generates DTMF based on the standard set-op for DTMF for PSTN
 telephones. SIPPS transmits DTMF as tones and not as events. Hence, any
 application awaiting an event instead of a tone will not be able to work
 with SIPPS




 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] OT: My congestion music.

2003-08-30 Thread Josh Roberson



Wanna cheap laugh?

IAXTel: 17005334094.

-Josh


[Asterisk-Users] Dialogic cards...

2003-08-20 Thread Josh Roberson



Are the dialogic DTI series cards supported in 
asterisk? I know there's standard API, but I don't know if it supports 
only the cards listed on the digium site, or if it will support ALL dialogic 
cards.. Sorry, I *AM* a newbie to this stuff, just trying to get my hands 
on a good card.

Thanks.


[Asterisk-Users] Brooktrout PRI-ISA48 card... info..

2003-08-19 Thread Josh Roberson



I have the option to purchase an Brooktrout 
PRI-ISA48 dual-span T1 card, which, upon checking with brooktrout, is supported 
for linux 2.x, but before I do this, I want to check and see what the opinions 
of your, the list members, and Mark, of course, as far as asterisk being able to 
use this card. 

ANY information would be helpful, as this offer 
will expire to me very soon.

Thank you. :)


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Brooktrout PRI-ISA48 card... info..

2003-08-19 Thread Josh Roberson
It did I think, however I do still have an ISA slot to use   My question
was, will it work with asterisk?


- Original Message - 
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Brooktrout PRI-ISA48 card... info..


 On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 04:08, Josh Roberson wrote:
  I have the option to purchase an Brooktrout PRI-ISA48 dual-span T1
  card, which, upon checking with brooktrout, is supported for linux
  2.x, but before I do this, I want to check and see what the opinions
  of your, the list members, and Mark, of course, as far as asterisk
  being able to use this card.
 
  ANY information would be helpful, as this offer will expire to me very
  soon.

 It is ISA. Didn't the ISA bus go away with PC99 specs? It is getting
 extremely rare to find ISA motherboards now days. Don't waste your time
 on it. If you consider your time with more than minimum wage then the
 time spent making it work will be more than buying a digium card.


 -- 
 Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 403 FORBIDDEN Help!

2003-08-18 Thread Josh Roberson



is the sip extension on the vocal sip server also 
1234? if not, that could be why it's not working... when you're dialing 
sip, you have to use the format:

exten = LOCEXT,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port)

so it would be something like

exten = 1234,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060)

where REMEXT is the sip extension you're trying to 
dial.

pardon me with the context stuff, i just woke up 
recently, and didn't think to ask if the remote extension was the 
same.



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bartosz Jozwiak 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:50 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 403 
  FORBIDDEN Help!
  
  
  Asterix PBX is loggin to Vocal and the extension number is also loggin on 
  the same vocal server.
  I cannot make it work :(
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Josh Roberson 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:43 
AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 403 
FORBIDDEN Help!

I'm new too, but alot of my 403 forbidden 
messages when adding extensions were due to context rules.. make 
sure that the client dialing the extension is included in the same context 
your extension is in. 

just my thoughts on it, as it resolved a lot of 
403 errors for me.



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Bartosz 
  Jozwiak 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:31 
  AM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] 403 
  FORBIDDEN Help!
  
  Hello,
  
  I have a question.
  I set up an extension to 1234
  
  exten = 1234,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060)
  
  And when I dial that extension I got in SIP 
  message "403 FORBIDDEN"
  Can somebody tell me why I cannot call that 
  extension? When I am not using Asterisk I can call that extension without 
  any problems.
  My SIP proxy is VOCAL.
  I am new here so I do not know a lot 
  yet.
  
  Thank you in advance.
  
  Bartosz 
  Jozwiak