Re: [asterisk-users] Callwithus.com is discontinuing IAX service

2009-06-29 Thread Tony Nichols
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:

 Callwithus.com is discontinuing iax service.
 Can anybody recommend IAX provider - I need somebody with good rates to
 Philippines.

 --
 Joseph

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Voipstreet.com seems to have very good service. I have been testing for
several weeks now, without issue.


-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] * + Legacy PBX works but strange problem

2008-12-03 Thread Tony Nichols
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Steve Totaro 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Sriram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Hi
 below are my configs:
 pstn(e1)---asterisk (span1)-legacy pbx(connected via span2)-
 legacy pbx analog extensions.

 my dial plan is like callers dial into asterisk(span1) , hear an IVR
 option and they are connected to the agents via the legacy pbx (which is in
 sync with asterisk on span2)This works perfectly fine until about 200
 calls or so...After that time when asterisk tries to dial to the legacy pbx
 - the call drops with error All are busy congested at this time .the same
 is indicated on asterisk -rvv , but the spans are up and active at
 that time... can anyone throw some light on this ?

  ZAPTEL.CONF


 span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4
 span=2,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4

 bchan=1-15
 dchan=16
 bchan=17-31

 bchan=32-46
 dchan=47
 bchan=48-62
  ZAPATA.CONF


 context=pri-pstn
 switchtype=euroisdn
 pridialplan=local
 usecallerid=yes
 hidecallerid=no
 callwaiting=yes
 usecallingpres=yes
 callwaitingcallerid=yes
 threewaycalling=yes
 transfer=yes
 cancallforward=yes
 callreturn=yes
 group=1
 callgroup=1
 pickupgroup=1
 immediate=yes
 musiconhold=default
 signalling = pri_cpe
 channel = 1-15
 channel = 17-31

 context=pri-legacy
 immediate=yes
 group=2
 overlapdial=yes
 signalling = pri_net
 channel = 32-46
 channel = 48-62

  EXTENSIONS.CONF


 ;
 ; Context PRI-Public
 ;
 [pri-pstn]
 ;
 include = default
 ;
 exten = s,1,Answer

 exten = s,2,Dial(Zap/g2/1888); Dial to legacy pbx and sends the 4 DID 
 digits needed for the legacy pbx
 exten = s,3,Hangup
 ;
 ; Context PRI-legacy
 ;
 [pri-legacy]
 ;
 include = default
 ;
 exten = s,1,Answer
 exten = s,2,DigitTimeout,2
 exten = s,3,ResponseTimeout,2
 exten = _X.,1,Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN})
 exten = _X.,2,Congestion


 This is just a suggestion that has worked very well for me in the past when
 dealing with Legacy systems that have only Analog phones connected.

 Ditch the Legacy system and get some form of channel bank.  If you want to
 go SIP to Analog, I have had great luck with Quintum Tenor AX.  Since, you
 have a spare E1 port, you could simply terminate the analog lines to a tried
 and true channel bank.  I have never looked for an E1 channel bank (30 port
 density) but I would assume they exist.

 If the Legacy system has proprietary, digital extensions, that complicates
 things a bit.

 Special apps running or connected on your Legacy system can usually be
 migrated and after that bit of growing pain, you have all the flexibility
 you want to customize.

 --
 Thanks,
 Steve Totaro
 +18887771888 (Toll Free)
 +12409381212 (Cell)
 +12024369784 (Skype)

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --


I have noticed when connecting our legacy system to asterisk, the option 

overlapdial=yes


caused issues with only certain exchanges... and would appear randomly. It
seems to add a pause of some 4 sec. when dialing.
This would give you the busy error.

-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] 64 bit HPEC modules available?

2007-02-16 Thread Tony Nichols

On 2/16/07, Greg Siemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I am running 64 bit linux on my Asterisk box and would like to get the
new HPEC software running on it.  However, while there are 32 bit modules
available, there are no 64 bit modules on the ftp site:
http://ftp.digium.com/pub/telephony/hpec/64-bit/

In some places on the digium website it states 32 bit only and other
places including the documentation it states 32  64 bit are available.

Is there a 64 bit version of the HPEC module or are the 32 bit modules
suitable (can't imagine that they would be).

Thanks in advance

Greg

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



I talked to tech support today... no 64bit yet.

--
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FYI new aricle on asteisk

2006-01-04 Thread Tony Nichols
Got my latest Linux magazine (www.linux-magazine.com) and fetured is asterisk in home network.

I've also been in contact with Novel/SUSE about their asterisk pakages. Reinhard Max the maintainer.

He has hinted at new packages for SUSE 10. The current ones work well (in production) however he is unsure 
about the new zaptel intergration but I'm keeping my fingers crossed!
-- A.G. (Tony) NicholsI.S. Manager
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SUSE 10.1

2006-01-04 Thread Tony Nichols
I have been told the next version of SUSE will contain the 1.2.1 build.
I am unsure if the zaptel module will be ready -- but I have hight
hopes!
Per my last post... 10.0 is working very well in production -- including the auto updates.-- A.G. (Tony) NicholsI.S. Manager
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Tiny Echo on PSTN via Zaptel

2005-09-29 Thread Tony Nichols
I have had problems between the sip/FXO lies and was able to kill the
echo by trying different combinations of the echocancel line to 64 (I
think it has settings in 32 bit increments)
Just kept trying different ones till it went away. Here is my config:

group=1
context=line1
signalling=fxs_ks
usecallerid=yes
callerid=asreceived
echocancel=64
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
callgroup=1
rxgain=1.2
channel = 1

context=line2
signalling=fxs_ks
usecallerid=yes
callerid=asreceived
echocancel=64
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
callgroup=1
rxgain=1.2
channel = 2
musiconhold=default
context=line3
signalling=fxs_ks
usecallerid=yes
callerid=asreceived
echocancel=64
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
callgroup=1
rxgain=1.2
channel = 3

group=2
context=line4
signalling=fxs_ks
usecallerid=yes
callerid=asreceived
echocancel=96
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
callgroup=2
channel = 4

Hope this helps!

t o n yOn 9/28/05, Shaw Terwilliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using Asterisk 1.0.9, a Digium TE210P dual T1 card, and two Rhinochannel banks (one 12FXO/12FXS, the other 24 FXS).So it's an analogphone on the inside connected to one of the FXS ports, and PSTN lineconnected to one of the FXO ports.
My problem is that as soon as I hear the _first_ ring when I dial outthrough the PSTN line, I hear a tiny echo on the phone (I estimatebetween 20ms and 40ms), which never goes away for this call.It's just
loud enough to bug the heck out of me when I'm talking (I could estimatethe gain relationship with ztmonitor if it would help).The soundon the recipient end of the connection is perfect.If I make a call from the phone to the another internal extension (another
phone on an FXS port), there is no echo.If I call into Comedian mail,there is no echo.I've checked all my gains.The internal gains were a bit loud to startwith because of the powered phones, but now they all fall comfortably within
ztmonitor's dynamic range display.The PSTN line is pretty good at tx 0 andrx 0, so I left it.I've tried turning them down, but that didn't killthe echo.My zapata.conf includes these lines at the bottom:
echocancel=yesechocancelwhenbridged=noechotraining=yescontext=companyA-pstntxgain=0.0rxgain=0.0signalling=fxs_ksgroup=1channel=1-7context=companyB-pstntxgain=0.0
rxgain=0.0signalling=fxs_ksgroup=2channel=11-12context=internaltxgain=-12.0rxgain=-8.0signalling=fxo_lscallerid=asreceivedgroup=3channel=13-48When the calls are connected, I can use zap show channel 11 and verify
that the echo cancellation is ON.But I can still hear one.I've also tried echocancelwhenbridged=yes, but it didn't make any difference.--Shaw Terwilliger 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]SourceGear LLC-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQFDOuxyPEbgvbl6u4ERAh/gAKCAu+gAr9TYsMG5TYqozV3ebIvezwCdGIHkkftrFLFK4purux/sVIPRhKk=
=9WG3-END PGP SIGNATURE-___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- A.G. (Tony) NicholsI.S. Manager
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zaptel Problems with 1.0.9

2005-08-10 Thread Tony Nichols
On 7/27/05, Paul Traue, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm experiencing rather severe problems with 1.0.9 (we've had to backrev
 to our last version we know works (1.0.5).
 
 We are running a single PRI line with a T100P card.  After about 10
 hours of asterisk running and the modules loaded we start hearing noise
 and stuttering on any call that passes over the PRI line.  I've tried
 this with echo cancellation on and off with no difference.
 
 This is a new problem for us as 1.0.5 behaves perfectly in this regard
 (it has it own issues, but that's another story).  We would like to move
 back to 1.0.9 however restarting out phone system (which is in
 production) every 10 hours isn't really an option.
 
 Is anyone experiencing any similar symptoms, and if not what information
 would the developers need to work on this.  Please note that running
 unstable isn't an option as the only PRI line I have to play with at the
 moment is our main line.
 
 Paul
 
I have it in production on 8 servers (2 have pri's) no problems.
One remote site keeps crashing when I do a compile so I left it at 1.0.7
The other 6 are hp d220's with fxo's installed.

-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Trying to get *8 call pickup to work

2005-06-29 Thread Tony Nichols
|alaw|g729)
 Non-codec capabilities: us - 0x1 (g723), peer - 0x1 (g723), combined - 0x1 
 (g723)
 Jun 28 10:43:23 DEBUG[16774]: chan_sip.c:7329 handle_request: Check for res 
 for 1310
 Jun 28 10:43:23 DEBUG[16774]: chan_sip.c:1620 update_user_counter: Call from 
 user '1310' is 1 out of 0
 Looking for *8 in default
 Jun 28 10:43:23 DEBUG[16774]: chan_sip.c:4650 build_route: build_route: 
 Contact hop: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 list_route: hop: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Transmitting (no NAT):
 SIP/2.0 100 Trying
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pickup.phone.ip.addr;branch=z9hG4bKb828ead3d3936e08
 From: Test SIP sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=5eba6d75ff7e1e47
 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as23dd6dfb
 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CSeq: 48201 INVITE
 User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Length: 0
 
 
  to pickup.phone.ip.addr:5060
 Jun 28 10:43:23 DEBUG[16774]: res_features.c:1709 ast_pickup_call: No call 
 pickup possible...
 Jun 28 10:43:23 NOTICE[16774]: chan_sip.c:7402 handle_request: Nothing to 
 pick up
 Reliably Transmitting (no NAT):
 SIP/2.0 503 Unavailable
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pickup.phone.ip.addr;branch=z9hG4bKb828ead3d3936e08
 From: Test SIP sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=5eba6d75ff7e1e47
 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as23dd6dfb
 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CSeq: 48201 INVITE
 User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Length: 0
 
 
  to pickup.phone.ip.addr:5060
 
 
 Please also let me know if any other information would help to
 troubleshoot this.
 
 Robert Woodcock
 Sr. Network Engineer
 Print, Inc.
 (425) 629-2424
 http://www.printinc.com
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] bristuff-0.2.0-RC8g: zaptel error in suse 9.2

2005-06-20 Thread Tony Nichols
On 6/19/05, Bob Goddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Friday 17 Jun 2005 18:05, Manuel Casal wrote:
  Marco Parmeggiani escribió:
   Manuel Casal ha scritto:
   I made the make menuconfig and make dep in the kernel sources.
  
   i do not remember well how i solved that problem but i'm sure that
   make dep will issue you a warning and stop.
   run make to start the kernel build process and then stop it after
   few seconds. it will create the necessary symlinks in the kernel tree.
   maybe there's a more elegant solution but this should work.
 
 [... Yet another f*ck*ng signature not deleted ...]
 
 [...]
  SUBDIRS=/usr/src/asterisk/bristuff-0.2.0-RC8g/zaptel-1.0.7 modules
  make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.8-24.16-obj/i386/smp'
  make[1]: *** No rule to make target `modules'.  Stop.
  make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.8-24.16-obj/i386/smp'
  make: *** [linux26] Error 2
  linux:/usr/src/asterisk/bristuff-0.2.0-RC8g/zaptel-1.0.7 #
 
  Now what?:(
 
 Have a read at /usr/src/linux*/README.SUSE
I never could get 9.2 to work right... even with THEIR asterisk rpms
(from the install cd)
However they seem to have fixed it in 9.3 (I have 3 installations working well).
Digium tech support won't touch either of them. They told me SUSE
changes a bit somewhere that prohibits loading modules that don't have
it.

If you don't want to use the 9.3 rpms you may have a problem on your
hands. sadly I realy like thair distro. wish they would let us
know how to make non suse modules work.

With 9.1 I followed the admin guide; and it always worked:
cd /usr/src/linux
zcat /proc/config.gz  .config
make oldconfig

Then make the symlink for zaptel:

cd /usr/src
ln -s nameofkerneldirectory linux-2.6

Good luck!
t o n y
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dell PowerEdge + TDM

2005-06-20 Thread Tony Nichols
On 6/17/05, David Hajek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you have analog TDM in it?
 
 -David
 
 Oswaldo Arratia wrote:
 
 I bought a Dell SC1425 and installed a T1/E1 card from Digium and I tried to
 configure it using [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripts and did not work, so I went the 
 long way and
 configure with zaptel's instructions and voila! It works like a charm.
 
 Oswaldo
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hajek
 Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 8:05 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Dell PowerEdge + TDM
 
 Hi,
 
 what new Dell servers are compatible and KNOWN to work with Digium TDM
 cards? I've looked at Digium's compatibility list at
 http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=compatibility. Does this mean that
 other Dell servers like SC1420, SC1425, 800, 1800 are working just fine with
 TDM cards?
 
 Can someone clarify this?
 
 Thanks
 
 -David

I have 3 sc420's with SATA. All are working well. One has T100P and 1
4 port FXO card. The other 2 have 1 4 port FXO only.
t o n y
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 64 bit

2005-05-16 Thread Tony Nichols
On 5/13/05, Kaj J. Niemi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  How did you get it to compile?
  Do you have to have a strictly 64 bit compile environment?
 
 On RHEL4 it compiles just fine out of the box. Some of the locations are
 not strictly correct (things get sent to /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64..)
 but those are easily fixed when building the rpms. Everything is strictly
 64-bit, running mixed 32/64 is just asking for trouble. I also integrated
 the building of pwlib 1.9.0/openh323 1.17.1 to the whole build process
 and sound between sip - h.323 users behing Cisco CME systems works great
 along with using res_config_mysql, cdr_addon_mysql for realtime and cdr
 logging. :) I spent a few days to figure out the best way of building
 everything and now usually just drop a cvs snapshot (and/or selective
 patches from mantis) to stay current.
 
 
 // kaj
 ___
I am running on SUSE 9.3x64 with very good results. zttest shows
99.9877 (lowest)
However the distro supplied the 64bit rpms
 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dlink VPNs??

2005-02-15 Thread Tony Nichols
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:39:09 -0500, Mike Chapman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 Hi, 
   
 I am thinking of purchasing a cheap Dlink VPN for testing purposes for use
 with my Asterisk box and would like to ask the list for advice on how to
 pick a VPN that will work with my box. I am a newbie to both VPN's and
 Asterisk so any advice will be appreciated. 
   
 Thanks, 
   
 Mike 
 ___
I have 2 clients using the 3com secure gateways... never had a problem yet!
My cisco 2610 and pix hate it... but some people have luck with them.


-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PIX Firewall configuration??

2005-02-01 Thread Tony Nichols
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:08:50 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'd like to open up my firwall so that I can connect my SIP phones to a
 test server behind or firewall. I can configure an outside addtess to pass
 traffic to the internal address of the Asterisk server. I'm not sure what
 other ports need to be opened. My SIP phone will either be at my home
 behind a linksys cable/dsl router or perhaps at a hotel when I'm on the
 road. What am I missing in this configuration? Is STUN needed?
 
 Pat
 

looks to me that it would be easier to prchase a vpn lic.. I've
tried some of the suggestions on the list to no avail.
Until version * 1.03 came out... I still had echo/cutouts through the
vpn. Now so far knock on wood repeatadly it is going ok.

Here is what I found on the list:



It works fine for me.  I have a handful of Cisco 7960's behind a PIX
firewall and they register to a Asterisk server outside of the PIX with no
trouble at all.   I didn't do anything special to the PIX (i.e. no access
list entries).

 

The tricks I found to make it work generally apply to any setup where the
clients are behind NAT.   I also run the tftp server for the phones to get
configs inside the firewall, and the SIPDefault.cnf file specifies the proxy
address outside of the firewall.

 

In the Cisco phone config I have these NAT settings:

nat_enable: 1   ; 0-Disabled (default), 1-Enabled

nat_address:  ; WAN IP address of NAT box (dotted IP or
DNS A record only)

voip_control_port: 5060 ; UDP port used for SIP messages (default -
5060)

start_media_port: 16384 ; Start RTP range for media (default -
16384)

end_media_port: 32766   ; End RTP range for media (default - 32766)

nat_received_processing: 0  ; 0-Disabled (default), 1-Enabled

 

And the sip.conf entry for this peer is:

 

[7000]

type=friend

nat=yes

qualify=yes

context=

secret=

callerid=

host=dynamic

canreinvite=no

dtmfmode=rfc2833

 

timer_register_expires: 120

 

Setting the registry timer to 120 seconds causes the phone to send out a
packet at least every 2 minutes which will open a UDP xlate on the PIX for
the session.   Then the trick is to use both 'nat=yes' and 'qualify=yes' so
Asterisk chats with the phone pretty often.   The interval of OPTIONS or
REGISTER messages between Asterisk and phone definitely needs to be shorter
than the PIX's UDP xlate timeout or the PIX will close the xlate and you
won't be able to pass packets into the phone for an incoming call.

 

Note that you can put a numeric value after qualify= instead of yes to
fine-tine the interval at which it sends a OPTIONS message.

 Good Luck!

t o n y
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] turn on/off auto/attendant by dialing an extension

2004-12-28 Thread Tony Nichols
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 01:22:47 -0500, Jon Radon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can I ask why?  This is clearly the easiest/best way to go about it.
 
 
 On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:21:12 -0500, Tony Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The wikki has an example that uses a db
 
  ;Login with *801, log out with *802
  exten = *801,1,DBPut(auto/attendant=1)
  exten = *802,1,DBPut(auto/attendant=0)
 
  ;Incoming calls- check if autoattendant is logged in, otherwise goto auto
  exten = s,1,DBGet(autoattendant=auto/attendant)
  exten = s,2,GotoIf($${autoattendant} = 1?auto|1)
  exten = s,3,Dial(Zap/23,30,t)
  exten = s,4,Goto(auto|1)
 
  Is there a way to do it without the dbput/dbget?
 
  Thanks,
  --
  A.G. (Tony) Nichols
  I.S. Manager
  ___
  
 --
 Is it something someone said, was it something someone said?
 

I haven't used MySql much... and would like a simple solution I can
copy/paste to other installations.
 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] turn on/off auto/attendant by dialing an extension

2004-12-23 Thread Tony Nichols
The wikki has an example that uses a db

;Login with *801, log out with *802
 exten = *801,1,DBPut(auto/attendant=1)
 exten = *802,1,DBPut(auto/attendant=0)
 
 ;Incoming calls- check if autoattendant is logged in, otherwise goto auto
 exten = s,1,DBGet(autoattendant=auto/attendant)
 exten = s,2,GotoIf($${autoattendant} = 1?auto|1)
 exten = s,3,Dial(Zap/23,30,t)
 exten = s,4,Goto(auto|1) 

Is there a way to do it without the dbput/dbget?

Thanks,
-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX hardphone

2004-12-22 Thread Tony Nichols
There was talk on the list... some time ago... an iax firmware has yet
to be released.


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:35:23 -0500, Dorn Hetzel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I can't get the link to work.  Does this mean that there is
 some IP phone available which if loaded with the right
 firmware can do IAX?  If so, where can I buy one and where
 can I get the code?
 
 -Dorn
 
 On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 05:30:48PM +0100, Wilson Pickett wrote:
  This just in:
 
  Centrality has released Version 1.4 for PA168x based phones.
 
  Firmwarefiles for different protocols like SIP, IAX etc. can be
  downloaded from Centrality Website. Firmware for different brands is
  already available. I've tried out with my HOP-1002 which is actually a
  WuChuan with PA168S. It connects to my Asterisk and I succeeded to
  connect to German provider Purtel.com with IAX.
 
 
  Original source:
  http://yabb.pulver.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=HW-phone;action=display;num=1103573331
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


-- 
A.G. (Tony) Nichols
I.S. Manager
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk with SMP hardware

2004-12-09 Thread Tony Nichols
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:32:16 -0600, Andrew Aken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anyone have any experience with running asterisk on multi-processor
 computers (dual or quad)? Does asterisk on the latest Linux distros take
 advantage of the extra processors, or does it predominately utilize a
 single processor?

I've been running  dual opteron (suse 9.1) for several months now.
So far so good!

t o n y
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAXy Configuration

2004-11-22 Thread Tony Nichols
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 15:31 -0800, Erik Espinoza wrote:
 I can't seem to get this device to grab an ip from dhcp. We have a
 working dhcp server (unfortunately it is on Windows), but I don't show
 any leases requested by the iaxy.
 
 Anyone have any ideas?
 
 The ethernet and phone lines are plugged in before the device is powered.
 
 Thanks,
 Erik

I remember a note on the list about issues with a cisco switch, and
conecting an iaxy. Mine wouldn't grab an ip either (win2k server),
and a cisco 3500. I haven't had time to try a different switch yet.


-- 
Tony Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Appalachian Log Structures Inc.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Can some bady help me ???

2004-11-12 Thread Tony Nichols
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 20:46, steve szmidt wrote:
 On Thursday 11 November 2004 04:39 pm, Geoff Nordli wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  scribbled on :
   ok, mathew and other friends
   I have this package only and I don't now what a have to do with it I
   repeat im a new linux user I don't now how compile it.
   I need for start a list of steps to begin
  
   or a place where I can get it
  
   thanks
   rodney
 
  If Linux is a struggle for you then you may be better of looking at a Live
  CD type of installation.
 
  I haven't tried Xorcom's Rapid installation yet, but it may be worth a try:
 
  http://www.xorcom.com/rapid/index.html
 
 
  Geoff
 
 Not a bad idea. I just downloaded the SuSe live DVD and it's a very slick 
 system. Easier than anything else out there. I think they also got a Gnome 
 version and KDE version live CD.

On my new install of suse 9.1 I do the following

1. during the suse install I pick EVERYTHING (except the united linux
box -)! (specific packages are listed on the astrisk website.
2. don't let it do an update (it askes at the end of the installation).
3. after first boot log in; type cd /usr/src/linux (hit enter)
type zcat /proc/config.gz  .config (hit enter)
type make oldconfig (hit enter) 
Lots of things will scroll by very quickly if you didn't select the
kernel source packages you'll get an error here...
4. cd /usr/src (hit enter) then type ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.6.4-54.5
linux-2.6 (hit enter) --- linux-2.6.4-54.5 is the stock 9.1 kernel... if
you did an update this will be wrong.
5. cd /where/the folder/that/holds/the/asterisk/libpri/zapte/files  I
put them in /pbx for simplicity.
6 type cd zaptel (enter)
7. type make clean; make install; cd ..
8. when thats done type cd libpri (enter) hit the arrow up key till you
see the same command you typed befor make clean; make install; cd ..
9. when thats done type cd asterisk (enter) then type make clean; make
install (enter).
10 that will take several min. --- even with a fast machine. WHen it's
done you will see the instructions to type make samples (hit enter).

That should get you started! These instructions work with both my intel
and opteron based systems.

Welcome to the wonderful world of asterisk!

t o n y



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Administration and Management requirements (splinter from $200 AMP bounty thread)

2004-11-12 Thread Tony Nichols
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 14:48, JAMES BOTHAM wrote:
 Hi there,
 
 I agree with Greg and also with the documentation
 group, we are all great at bitching about * (I know I
 have done a lot of it but thats because UK and support
 for us is minimal or so it feels) we need to unite,
 the only reason Microsoft are so popular is because it
 take 2 minutes to install and applications are usually
 it is easy to configure (coming from Windows to Suse
 was quite easy due to YAST but then from Suse to
 Fedora Core is a nightmare thank god for web min)
 users a nd administrators don't want to be editing
 conf files to do the smallest thing i.e. create a
 dialplan  thats a nightmare, coming from an Avaya
 background (although it has been a year since i
 touched an Avaya INDeX) you could create powerful and
 effective dial plans completely graphically it was so
 easy anybody could do it. Although all system
 administration was done through a menu driven console
 and that was really simple to use. We need to take the
 good from other systems and merge this to Asterisk.
 Also we have to document it. theres no point in
 writing the code if nobody can use it.
 
 I would like to offer my skills to the production of
 this I can document, bug test and am great at user
 interface design I come from a software house
 background which I can also utilise to get this
 project off the ground.
 
 I suggest that we all meet in a chat room to create
 some form of a project map and get this off the
 ground.
 
 
 Cheers
 
 James

Why not webmin? someone started the interface int (it's in the downloads
folder; many admins use it, there are s many plugins for it
currently --- so it must not be THAT hard to code.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] gold rush?

2004-11-12 Thread Tony Nichols
Another new article with asterisk/Digium in mind

http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/5909

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Where to post SuSE 9.x startup script?

2004-09-08 Thread Tony Nichols
I would be interested in the script. Did you do zaptel drivers too?

On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:41, Martin Mielke wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I just modified one of the startup scripts provided on the tarball to 
 fit on my SuSE 9.x system to start/stop Asterisk when the system boots 
 or goes down.
 
 Maybe I'm overseeing the answer but could't find where to 
 post/(cvs)upload the changes I made...
 
 
 TIA,
 Martin
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp and certain (e.g. Canon) fax machines

2004-08-26 Thread Tony Nichols
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 09:38, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
 On Wednesday 25 August 2004 23:50, Steve Underwood wrote:
  Several people have reported problems sending faxes from spandsp-0.0.1k
  to Canon FAX machines. A spandsp user had the same problem with another
  make of FAX machine, and traced the problem to a bug in the file t30.c
  of spandsp. Line 542 says s-t4.rx_file[0] where it should say
  s-t4.tx_file[0]. This fixes his problem, and I suspect it will also fix
  the Canon fax machine problem. Can someone having problems with Canon
  machines try this change, and tell me the result?
 
 I will give this a shot shortly.  I still get spandsp segfaulting the odd time 
 so I need to set up a secondary asterisk box to prevent such problems.  I've 
 already posted to the list about that particular problem, it's not something 
 as simple as the wrong copy of libtiff or anything.  :-)
 
 Just FYI; we have a Canon IR3300 fax/copier/scanner big badass unit (over 3mil 
 copies and going...)
 
 -A.
I too have an ir3300 and was having issues with faxes. I found this
googleing:

Hooper:
IR330 w/ print and fax works just fine. Except that it does  not
receive from one customer. May I add that it's their most important
customer! The faxes are coming from a computer. 

I have looked at my past note on a similar problem and did this: 

SSW3 1000-0010 from - 
SSW17 -0010 from - 

MEM 
NL to on from off 
ATT to 6 

NUM 
02 to 15 
03 to 20 
04 to 15 
010 to 6800 

Not sure of the rom versions. 

Still isn't receiving. Any suggestions? 


RussW
Try 
setting SW05 bit 3 to 1 from 0 

I have seen this same fault with the HP31xx 

  
Hooper:
Problem fixed! Changed SSW5 bit three to 1 from zero.

I only changed the ssw5 bit the other changes seemed to make it
worse.

Hope this helps!

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Inter-digit timers on t100

2004-08-19 Thread Tony Nichols
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 17:01, Kris Boutilier wrote:
 For the inbound digit problem try adding :
 
  debounce=50 ; Needed to reduce the initial off hook
 debounce
 
 in the relevant context for those trunks in /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf
 
 Also, are you using 'immediate=yes'?
 
I'll give it a try. Currently I have immediate=no

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compile error on Zaptel with Suse 9.1 (follow-up of subject: What is the best Linux for asterisk)

2004-08-18 Thread Tony Nichols
I'm running 1 9.1 32bit and 1 9.1 64bit. Both are the shipped kernels
and are working very well.

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Inter-digit timers on t100

2004-08-18 Thread Tony Nichols
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 14:08, Jason Kawakami wrote:
 Hello all-
 
 So I have * up and running and connected to a legacy system via em_w lines
 and have no trouble dialing from * through the tie line but from the PBX
 across the tie line I am having intermittant receipt of the DTMF.  T-Berd
 testing is showing that the digits are coming across but * is either missing
 the first digit consistantly.
 
 This seems to me to have something to do with start timers or inter-digit
 dtmf timers or something.
 
 I have even tied 2 * together each with t100 cards and have the same
 problem.
 
 Not sure how to proceed, any suggestions?
 
 Jason Kawakami
 
I had nearly the same issue between * and an nec pbx. The only way I
could get around it was to either make the number a speed dial, or tell
the users if the call failed to use the redial button on their phones.
However * had issues with the last digits, not the first.

The wiki has a section on the inter digit timers, but all the examples
I've seen are confined to incoming calls to voicemail.

t o n y  

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 'no authority found' problem

2004-08-05 Thread Tony Nichols
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 10:32, Simon Ward wrote:
 Hi everyone,
 I'm having some problem trying to set up an IAX connection between two * 
 servers.
 The scenario is :
 serverA has an X100p card and will direct all calls from the X100p over 
 IAX to a specific extension on serverB which is at the other end of an 
 unfirewalled VPN connection.
 
 At the moment serverA tries to redirect the call to serverB but recieves 
 this message (it appears on both servers) :
 
 -- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff) in 
 new stack
  -- Called test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff
 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
 Timestamp: 6ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 0 [192.168.1.250:4569]
 VERSION : 2
 CALLED NUMBER   : cardiff
 LANGUAGE: en
 USERNAME: test
 FORMAT  : 2
 CAPABILITY  : 65283
 ADSICPE : 2
 DATE TIME   : 151287361
 
 Rx-Frame Retry[No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT
 Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
 CAUSE   : No authority found
 
 Aug  4 14:50:02 WARNING[147465]: chan_iax2.c:5339 socket_read: Call rejected
 by 192.168.1.250: No authority found
 Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK
 Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
  -- Hungup 'IAX2/192.168.1.250:4569/1'
== No one is available to answer at this time
 
 Here are excerpts from the config files :
 
 ServerA:
 
 extensions.conf
 [incoming]
 exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff)
 
 ServerB:
 
 iax.conf
 [cardiff]
 type=friend
 username=test
 secret=test
 context=sipfonescard
 
 extensions.conf
 [sipfonescard]
 exten = cardiff,1,Dial(SIP/1101)
 
 Has anyone got any suggestions on what might be the solution to the 'no 
 authority found' problem, I'm convinced that it must be something pretty 
 simple that I'm missing but I can't find any tips to point me in the 
 right direction.
 
 Any suggestions would be appreciated,
 
 Thanks,
 Simon Ward
 ___
I also have a vpn between my sites.
Here is what I use:

iax (both servers)

[pbx]
type=user
secret=test
trunk=yes
host=dynamic
qualify=yes
username=pbx

servera:extensions.conf
; iax princeton bridge
exten = _2XX,1,Dial IAX2/pbx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN}

serverb:extensions.conf
; iax ripley bridge
exten = _1XX,1,Dial IAX2/pbx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN}

Don't use trunk=yes if you don't have a digium card at each pbx (it's
needed for timing).

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Any small colleges/universities using PBX or Voicemail?

2004-08-03 Thread Tony Nichols
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 08:21, Brian Hudson wrote:
 What an ACTIVE newsgroup! 
 
 I'm in the early stages of researching Asterisk.  My current environment
 is a small college (~1000 sets/~400 student sets), Avaya Definity
 G3si/Seimens Rolm Phonemail.  As you can imagine, the maintenance,
 licensing, and equipment costs are HEFTY.
 
 So.. are there any small colleges/universities using PBX or Voicemail?
 
 If so, I'd be interested in your migration path.  What equipment was
 replaced, and how did you handle the loss of investment in any
 proprietary sets?
 
  
 
 Many thanks,
 
 Brian Hudson
 
Brian, check the last few days of the list - several people have been
talking about integrating systems like yours and asterisk.

Remember the wiki is your friend! 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Avaya 
t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 to IAX2...i'm obviously an idiot!!

2004-07-26 Thread Tony Nichols
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 14:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi All
 
 I'm trying to get two Asterisk servers to talk to each other using IAX(2).
 
 I've read the WiKi and the docs and tried the examples.
 
 I can't get it to work (I have 2 x 7960's registering on one server and 1 x 7960 
 registering on the other).
 
 I've set them up as follows...
 
 The two servers are set up as friends and have consecutive IP address's.
 
 The setup is that the prefix 3 determines that the server dials the extension number 
 on the other servers local context:-
 
 extensions.conf
 
 exten = _3,1,Dial(IAX2/OtherServer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5036/${EXTEN:[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED])
 

The correct port is 4569 for iax2 - the older protocol was 5036

 When I do a dial say 32221 this is what comes up in the console:-
 
 Executing GoTo(SIP/2231-, intern-post|32221|1) in new stack
 
 GoTo (intern-post,32221,1)
 
 Executing Dial(SIP/2231-, IAX2/OtherServer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5036/[EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]) in new stack
 
 Called OtherServer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5036/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Warning: chan_iax2.c:1413 attempt_transmit: Max retries exceeded to host 
 OtherServerIP on IAX2/OtherServerIP:5036/3 (type = 6, subclass = 1, ts=2, seqno=0)
 
 Hungup 'IAX2/OtherServerIP:5036/3'
 
 then the regular cleanup commands
 
 In IAX2 Show Peers I get:-
 
 OtherServerOtherServerIP(S)  255.255.255.255   4569UnMonitored
 
 I'm confused
 
 why is the connection showing on port 4569 in show peers?  Is this a default?
 
 Is there a way to test the validity of the IAX2 connection from the console?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 P
Here is the iax.conf for both mine:

[pbx]
type=user
secret=test
trunk=yes
host=dynamic
qualify=yes
username=pbx

extensions.conf:

; iax princeton bridge
exten = _2XX,1,Dial IAX2/pbx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN}

Works for me!

t o n y





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Echo in asterisk phones.

2004-07-26 Thread Tony Nichols
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 16:03, albyfromg wrote:
 Hi all.
 We have just setup and asterisk with a 4 line zaptel board with Cisco
 7960 and BudgeTone-100 IP phones. All works fine except for this
 nagging echo. Whenever I talk, I hear my voice echo back.. This only
 happens whenever I talk on an actual phone call. Whenever I talk to
 another extension, no problems. I would appreciate any help. I have
 searched the google lists and have not found any relevant info.
 Thanks.
 ___
Do you have echocancelwhenbridged=yes in etc/asterisk/zapata.conf ?

Also beware if checking it in debug mode (like asterisk -vc)
Took me awhile to notice it was going away when I started asterisk
normally ban head on wall!
t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + NEC Electra Elite IPK Integration

2004-07-23 Thread Tony Nichols
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 11:51, Christopher L. Wade wrote:
 Tony Nichols wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 13:36, Christopher L. Wade wrote:
  
 Exactly which NEC T1 interface did you use?  I'm looking at the DTI-U20, 
 I don't think I'll need the U30, but I'm not entirely sure.
 
 Thanks,
 Chris
 
  
  I used the DTI-U10 (DTI-24-U10). Got it from GTS Telephone
  Inc.(732-323-8620) for $300.00 (reconditioned).
  My voice t1 comes into asterisk via the first T100P, and attaches to the
  nec t1 via the second T100P using em_wink (as a trunk).Then with LCR I
  make it add a 9 to the outgoing trunk so asterisk will route it to the
  T1.
  I grouped the channels that sales calls come into, and I grouped the
  channels that go to the nec, so I could use a dial string like: 
  
  [sales]
  exten = s,1,Playback,transfer|skip  ; Please hold while...
  exten = s,2,Dial,zap/g7/210 ; Ring, Nec sales group
  exten = s,3,Hangup
   
  and to ring extensions on the nec I did this:
  
  ; nec bridge
  exten = _1XX,1,Dial(zap/g7/${EXTEN})
  
  g7 (group7 is the T1 trunk); Extension 210 is a virtual extension set to
  ring 5 other nec extensions; and the 1XX will match extensions in the
  100 range that are not on the asterisk.
  
  I should get started on the doc's didn't realize how far I'd come
  till now.
  
  Problems I still have:
  1. If someone dials slowly from an nec extension - the nec sends the
  first group, asterisk then tells them the number is not in service.
  2. IAX2 connection to remote office is still choppy occasionally.
  Don't know if the pix 501 is getting overwhelmed by the encryption of
  voice packets or what?
  
  t o n y
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 I haven't really gotten too far into this, but I was wondering just what 
 'features' of the NEC phones (DTH-16D-1(BK)TEL) I'll be able to work 
 with from *?  I'm currently getting some pressure to ensure that all the 
 little bells, whistles, and lights will continue to work as they 
 currently do.  I'm also afraid that if the phones would end up becoming 
 'dumb' (or should I say dumber than they already are), this could kill 
 my plan for an NEC to * migration, and would be a huge loss for * in my 
 company, not to mention a huge extra expenditure for ACD Plus otherwise.
 
 Thankfully, regardless of the outcome of everything else, I will be 
 setting up one machine to interact with some IAXy's for remote extensions.
 
 thanks,
 chris
 
Well your in luck. All the nec features are retained. The only odd-ball
stuff the common user has had to deal with is the line key lights don't
appear like they use to. Originally we had the first 4 marked as local1
-4 then the rest toll1-8. Now when a call comes in button #15 flashes,
and when they pick it up to answer it is dropped on the next available
light (starting at local1). So far it hasn't been a big deal - just
takes some getting use to.
If all else fails you could let the nec answer the calls, and have
asterisk be extensions on the nec . but seems like such a waste.

I hope you have better luck than I with the remote extensions the
iax2 link to my vpn'd offices is a little to choppy... but getting
better.

Good Luck!
t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + NEC Electra Elite IPK Integration

2004-07-20 Thread Tony Nichols
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 13:36, Christopher L. Wade wrote:
 Exactly which NEC T1 interface did you use?  I'm looking at the DTI-U20, 
 I don't think I'll need the U30, but I'm not entirely sure.
 
 Thanks,
 Chris
 
I used the DTI-U10 (DTI-24-U10). Got it from GTS Telephone
Inc.(732-323-8620) for $300.00 (reconditioned).
My voice t1 comes into asterisk via the first T100P, and attaches to the
nec t1 via the second T100P using em_wink (as a trunk).Then with LCR I
make it add a 9 to the outgoing trunk so asterisk will route it to the
T1.
I grouped the channels that sales calls come into, and I grouped the
channels that go to the nec, so I could use a dial string like: 

[sales]
exten = s,1,Playback,transfer|skip  ; Please hold while...
exten = s,2,Dial,zap/g7/210 ; Ring, Nec sales group
exten = s,3,Hangup
 
and to ring extensions on the nec I did this:

; nec bridge
exten = _1XX,1,Dial(zap/g7/${EXTEN})

g7 (group7 is the T1 trunk); Extension 210 is a virtual extension set to
ring 5 other nec extensions; and the 1XX will match extensions in the
100 range that are not on the asterisk.

I should get started on the doc's didn't realize how far I'd come
till now.

Problems I still have:
1. If someone dials slowly from an nec extension - the nec sends the
first group, asterisk then tells them the number is not in service.
2. IAX2 connection to remote office is still choppy occasionally.
Don't know if the pix 501 is getting overwhelmed by the encryption of
voice packets or what?

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF issue --help

2004-07-19 Thread Tony Nichols
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 18:45, Andrew Yager wrote:
 On 17/07/2004, at 3:24 AM, Eric Wieling wrote:
 
  Tony Nichols wrote:
After calling a bank, or cc processing center; you have to enter 
  your
  social security number, or the cc number - followed by the # key. The 
  lovely * voice responds transfering I'm sorry that was an invalade
  selection. Sometimes the IVR on the other end still gets the digits 
  and
  proceeds; other times it breaks the IVR on the bank side and hangs up.
  How do I tell * to stop listning for the DTMF?
 
  ; dial a long distance outbound number exten = 
  _9XXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:1},,Tt)
  exten = _9XXX,2,Congestion
 
  Stop telling it to listen to DTMF.  It's pretty clear that you just 
  copied someone's Dial line from somewhere without learning what T and 
  t do.  show application dial on the Asterisk CLI to learn what T and 
  t do.
 
 If you really need the # transfer, there is a patch on the bug tracker 
 that implements the use of two keys for transfers (eg ##). I haven't 
 yet had a chance to test this feature, although I will.
 
 Yours,
 Andrew
 
Thank you Sir,

I'll give that a try  I had thought the transfer option would have a
time limit ... not the duration of the call. The boss likes the
secretary to dial the number then transfer to his extension ... so I'll
try that patch -- or maybe make her put them on hold and tell the boss
what line to pickup.
t o n y


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk + NEC Electra Elite IPK Integration

2004-07-19 Thread Tony Nichols
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 16:34, Christopher L. Wade wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm am currently in the process of trying to integrate an * box with an 
 NEC Electra Elite IPK.
 
 Currently, we have 7 POTS lines coming into our building.  These lines 
 are plugged into our NEC using the appropriate analog line interface 
 card from NEC.  The NEC effectively has NO configuration done to it, 
 other than to make all the internal phones ring when a call comes in. 
 We also have voicemail and an extremely simple auto attendant setup to 
 deal with calls during off hours.
 
 Due to the cost of all the components/software/consulting needed to make 
 the NEC do everything it needs to do, we are hoping to 'merge' the NEC 
 with an * box.
 
 In my 'working' * box, I have a wctdm11b (asterisk dev-kit) with 1 FXO 
 and 1 FXS card.  I say working, because I have everything setup if I 
 totally bypass the NEC.  As per an email conversation with Digium, we 
 are connecting our POTS line to the FXS card, and the NEC to the FXO card.
 
 My current dilemma is that when I plug the * box and the NEC together, I 
 cannot get the * box to 'dial' a particular extension on the NEC.  It is 
 my belief that this is due to some configuration changes needing to be 
 made on the NEC.  Unfortunately, this is the exact thing I needed to 
 avoid and the reason for changing from the NEC to * in the first place. 
   I know some changes to the NEC need to be made, but I am unsure as to 
 exactly what, and how to do it.
 
 Any input on how to get this working would be greatly appreciated.  If 
 more information is required, please let me know.  Please don't flame me 
 for possibly being off-top, I don't think I need baby stepping through 
 this, I simply need to know where to start looking.
 
 Thanks,
 Chris
I know what ya mean  I've spent nearly $800 in tech time for the Nec
guy to help me get mine going. I have the Eletra 192 functioning right
now, still have some bugs left but working. I used an Nec T1 card in
the electra, and a digium t100p in my * box.

Let me know if I can be of any help.

When I get the last of the bugs worked out I plan to write down the
details and put it on the wikki.
t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] DTMF issue --help

2004-07-16 Thread Tony Nichols
I'm getting down to the last of my * issues ...

After calling a bank, or cc processing center; you have to enter your
social security number, or the cc number - followed by the # key. 

The lovely * voice responds transfering I'm sorry that was an invalade
selection. Sometimes the IVR on the other end still gets the digits and
proceeds; other times it breaks the IVR on the bank side and hangs up.

How do I tell * to stop listning for the DTMF?

Here is my configs:

CVS head 7/14/2004
The call is made Zap to Zap no sip involved.

T100P t-1 (goes to provider ls t1)
T100P t-1 (goes to NEC pbx)

exten listing for outbound ld:

TRUNK=Zap/g2 

; dial a long distance outbound number 
exten = _9XXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:1},,Tt)
exten = _9XXX,2,Congestion

; Timeout and invalid rules
exten = #,1,Playback(invalid)
exten = #,2,Hangup
exten = t,1,Goto(#,1)
exten = i,1,Playback(invalid)

Any ideas?
t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Config Files

2004-07-02 Thread Tony Nichols
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 18:27, chouck wrote:
 Thanks robert, But im having a problem trying to add a user that can login,
 im using a sipura voip box trying to connect to the server and it always
 gives me SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden.  Under what config can I allow users and
 hows it work exactly?  Thanks again!
 
Try here: http://astguiclient.sourceforge.net/scratch_install.html 
Matt has a real good walk through installation and even a sample
sipura config.
t o n y 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compiling zaptel under 9.1 Suse

2004-06-24 Thread Tony Nichols
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 14:32, asterisk wrote:
 Have some errors with the above.
 
 I have tried make and make linux26
 
 Anyone got any clues ? I've googled but only got the make linux26 help
 
 Asterisk compiles and runs great, libpri compiles with no problems.
 
 TIA
 
 Julian.
 
 pbx:~ # cd /usr/src/zaptel
 pbx:/usr/src/zaptel # make linux26
 make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6 SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel modules
 make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.4-52'
   CHK include/linux/version.h
 *** Warning: Overriding SUBDIRS on the command line can cause
 ***  inconsistencies
 make[2]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
   CC [M]  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.o
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_net_open':
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1166: warning: passing arg 1 of `hdlc_open' from
 incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_net_stop':
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1238: warning: passing arg 1 of `hdlc_close' from
 incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_xmit':
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1294: error: structure has no member named `netdev'
 /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1294: warning: type defaults to `int' in

snip
This happened to me too (same dist/kernel) with cvs head 6/21/2004 -
older version 4/24/2004 worked ok. I'm going to try latest cvs today and
see if it works.
t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compiling zaptel under 9.1 Suse

2004-06-24 Thread Tony Nichols
Still no go I have asked Digium tech support to look into it. I need
the later cvs to get around a bug with the latest tdm400 card (load
driver - unload driver - load driver again to make it work.
t o n y
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 08:15, Tony Nichols wrote:
 On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 14:32, asterisk wrote:
  Have some errors with the above.
  
  I have tried make and make linux26
  
  Anyone got any clues ? I've googled but only got the make linux26 help
  
  Asterisk compiles and runs great, libpri compiles with no problems.
  
  TIA
  
  Julian.
  
  pbx:~ # cd /usr/src/zaptel
  pbx:/usr/src/zaptel # make linux26
  make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6 SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel modules
  make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.4-52'
CHK include/linux/version.h
  *** Warning: Overriding SUBDIRS on the command line can cause
  ***  inconsistencies
  make[2]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CC [M]  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.o
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_net_open':
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1166: warning: passing arg 1 of `hdlc_open' from
  incompatible pointer type
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_net_stop':
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1238: warning: passing arg 1 of `hdlc_close' from
  incompatible pointer type
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c: In function `zt_xmit':
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1294: error: structure has no member named `netdev'
  /usr/src/zaptel/zaptel.c:1294: warning: type defaults to `int' in
 
 snip
 This happened to me too (same dist/kernel) with cvs head 6/21/2004 -
 older version 4/24/2004 worked ok. I'm going to try latest cvs today and
 see if it works.
 t o n y
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compile Error

2004-06-24 Thread Tony Nichols
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 13:01, Joseph wrote:
 Just did a new cvs download and then tried to compile.
 
 I get this error message:
 chan_zap.c:59:2: #error You need newer libpri
 Then there are some more chan_zap.c errors.
 
 Here is the cvs command:
 export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/cvsroot
 cvs login
 cvs checkout zaptel asterisk libpri
 
 And the make command
 #cd /usr/src/zaptel
 #make
 #cd /usr/src/asterisk
 #make
 
 And I did this after moving the current zaptel, asterisk, and libpri to
 archival.
 
 Where do I get this file?
 Or what am I doing wrong...
The correct order is:
cd zaptel make clean; make install
cd libpri make clean; make install
cd asterisk make clean; make install

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Trunking help!

2004-06-22 Thread Tony Nichols
I'm trying to get two * boxes to talk no matter what variation I try
I get No Authority Found and connection refused from 192.168.1.5

I've googled, I've site searched to no avail.

Here is the server a configs (192.168.1.5):

iax.conf
[general]
port=5036
bandwidth=low
disallow=all
allow=gsm

jitterbuffer=yes
tos=lowdelay

register = pbx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[pbx]
type=peer
host=dynamic
trunk=yes
secret=test
qualify=yes

extensions.conf
[globals]
TRUNKP=IAX2/pbx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ; princeton aix trunk
; iax princeton bridge
exten = _2XX,1,Dial(${TRUNKP}/${EXTEN})


Server b config (192.168.2.2):
iax.conf
[general]
port=5036
bandwidth=low
disallow=all
allow=gsm
jitterbuffer=yes
tos=lowdelay

register = pbx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[pbx]
type=peer
host=dynamic
trunk=yes
secret=test
qualify=yes

I've tried adding a username=, removing dynamic, adding defaultip=
All have failed.

I'm using cvs head from yesterday. My network is a vpn with a cisco 2600
at site a, and a cisco pix 501 at site b. I have perfect connectivity
between the sites (2 t1's at site a - 1 t1 at site b).

t o n y

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Trunking help!

2004-06-22 Thread Tony Nichols
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 10:20, David Cook wrote:
 So you're saying that the following would be the same?
 
 iax.conf
 [YOUR_REC_SERVER]
 secret=mysecret
 host=my.receiving.server.ca
 context=local
 
 extensions.conf
 exten = _5XXX,1,Dial(IAX2/YOUR_REC_SERVER/${EXTEN})
 
 If so, what about the type=peer/user/friend thing? I did read the docs
 but maybe I'm thick. Maybe the visual person in me needs to see a matrix.
 
 Further, If I can get two boxes to talk together like this, what exactly
 is the register for ... what does it actually do?
 
 dbc.
 
 Quoting Kevin Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  David Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   [mycontext]
   exten =
  
 
 _5XXX,1,Dial(IAX2/REC_SERVER:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
   exten = _5XXX,2,Hangup exten = _5XXX,102,Hangup
   
  You really don't want your username and password to appear (in
  plain
  text) in your logs.
  
  Put the sensitive details in iax.conf instead of extensions.conf.
  As well as being more secure, it'll make your Dial() string
  shorter,
  and will mean that you only have to change the connection details
  in
  one place, should the need arise in the future.
  
  -- 
 _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
_/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s
  h
   _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
  
If I remove the trunk=yes and the context=local, then change to type
user it seems to work..
I will do some more testing to see if all the different extensions work.
I'm a little bewildered however  seems like peer should have been
correct, and trunking=yes.
Guess as long as I can direct calls to/from each location (4 total)
that's all that counts!

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users