Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-31 Thread Olivier Krief
2006/3/29, John Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The reality is, of course, that telephone systems have provided thisfunction for many years. A DSS/BLF is available on MANY so called legacysystems, so until this function is readily available , customers that
require a receptionist will continue to go elsewhere.Perhaps it is time to rethink the way data is exchanged between the CPUand the DSS/BLF?As someone said a very long time ago:Results, not excuses.
With user count growing, I think receptionist could evolve from hardware to hardware-software combination the same as receptionist job changes from assisting call transfers (check if someone is available before transfer) to blind call transfering (forward anyway and take the call back if nobody answers).
If my understanding is correct, in the later case, a receptionist doesn't really need BLF : he or she simply forward the call.He or she mainly needs a directory application helping him or her to find the right person within the organisation. And I don't think anyone could have the patience to harphone BLF labels every 2 weeks to keep up large site permanent user moves, adds and changes.
So the perfect receptionist application hardware-software combination should include a mix between directory application and softphone, and provide comfortable hardware to support these.My opinion is I don't think market trends are at works now to make this perfect combination happen anytime soon : 
- from my point of view, it could take years to gather inputs from receptionist around the world to provide them an effective software-hardware combination.- no one around the world really targets receptionist tools market (is it a market ?) : some companies sell headphones or hardphones but receptionnist account for such a tiny part of sales that these companies cannot really hear receptionists demands and design specific products.
- even if someone ever decide to focus on this, it would be difficult for someone to convince companies to improve receptionist tools once receptionist are trained and used.Maybe, a standard PC+headphone + a couple of software would be the best way to go ?
Even on that, obstacles remain such as :- how do you monitor legacy PBX users along Asterisk users ?- how do you monitor a distant Asterisk server whitout any Data link between both locations ?Regards
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-31 Thread John Novack




Olivier Krief wrote:
2006/3/29, John Novack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
  The
reality is, of course, that telephone systems have provided this
function for many years. A DSS/BLF is available on MANY so called legacy
systems, so until this function is readily available , customers that
require a receptionist will continue to go elsewhere.
Perhaps it is time to rethink the way data is exchanged between the CPU
and the DSS/BLF?
As someone said a very long time ago:
Results, not excuses.


  
  
  
With user count growing, I think receptionist could evolve from
hardware to hardware-software combination the same as receptionist job
changes from assisting call transfers (check if someone is available
before transfer) to blind call transfering (forward anyway and take the
call back if nobody answers).
  
  
If my understanding is correct, in the later case, a receptionist
doesn't really need BLF : he or she simply forward the call.
He or she mainly needs a directory application helping him or her to
find the right person within the organisation. And I don't think anyone
could have the patience to harphone BLF labels every 2 weeks to keep up
large site permanent user moves, adds and changes.
  
  
So the perfect receptionist application hardware-software combination
should include a mix between directory application and softphone, and
provide comfortable hardware to support these.
  
My opinion is I don't think market trends are at works now to make this
perfect combination happen anytime soon : 
- from my point of view, it could take years to gather inputs from
receptionist around the world to provide them an effective
software-hardware combination.
- no one around the world really targets receptionist tools market (is
it a market ?) : some companies sell headphones or hardphones but
receptionnist account for such a tiny part of sales that these
companies cannot really hear receptionists demands and design specific
products.
  
- even if someone ever decide to focus on this, it would be difficult
for someone to convince companies to improve receptionist tools once
receptionist are trained and used.
  
Maybe, a standard PC+headphone + a couple of software would be the best
way to go ?
  
Even on that, obstacles remain such as :
- how do you monitor legacy PBX users along Asterisk users ?
- how do you monitor a distant Asterisk server whitout any Data link
between both locations ?
  
Regards

>From a sales perspective, one needs a system that is capable of many
different configurations. a small business wants shared line
appearances, since that has been proven to work for them. Our of an
office, imagine a retail store, where everyone on the floor needs to be
able to answer, redirect a call, not know if another station is busy or
not, be able to do an all call page, or an off hook voice announce, to
name a few features. Square hybrid works well here.
In a larger establishment that has a receptionist who is used to a
DSS/BLF, before the sale there is a good chance he/she will be
consulted, and reject anything that requires a great deal of change.
Soft BLF, as someone else pointed out, can be a real problem when the
desktop is busy, has crashed, or the BLF window closed accidently
Trying to jam someone into an IP system WILL meet with resistance.
There are too many good systems out there that long ago overcame these
problems, and many of them are NOT that expensive.
Use the correct tool for the job. There are many places where Asterisk
works, and many where it is a square peg in a round hole

JMO

John Novack



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-31 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
I've been quiet on this discussion for a few days and reading  
everybody's thoughts.  But since I brought this subject up in the  
first place I thought I would bring it to a close with the results  
summarized.


1. The polycom phones do support attendant stations, but there is  
some incompatibility between their phone and asterisk that currently  
limits the number of monitored stations to 7.  They are aware of this  
limitation and are currently working on fixing it.


2. The Snom phones work and do not seem to suffer from this limit.

3. Snom phones give you up to 54 monitored lines currently, but there  
is indication on their website (use of the word currently) that  
they are trying to find a way to bring this number up (possibly  
linking more than one add-on module together).


4. Old style switchboards (such as DSS attendant stations) are a  
thing of the past and will likely die off in the future, but the  
world is not there yet, people still want them.


5. Computer based, on-screen monitoring systems are the future for  
large organizations as they are easy to change and easy to customize  
to fit exactly what you want.  But there are some things to resolve  
before the average user can use them without a dedicated computer  
screen to reduce frustration.  I have no doubt that as more companies  
move to VoIP systems these old DSS units will become a thing of the  
past, we just are not quite there yet.


6. Most people (not all, but most) who are given the option of a new  
way to monitor line status vs. the old way will probably eventually  
use the new way (some kind of FOP display).  But those same people  
will refuse to like the new way if the are forced to use it or  
nothing, just the way people are.  I don't doubt that we could slowly  
train our receptionists to use the new system while they have access  
to the old and simply wait until they say, you know what, we don't  
use that old box anymore, it just takes time. :)


So my original question was answered long ago, but I have enjoyed the  
thoughts and opinions of everybody that has contributed to this  
discussion.


Regards,
Daniel Hazelbaker
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-29 Thread John Novack
The reality is, of course, that telephone systems have provided this 
function for many years. A DSS/BLF is available on MANY so called legacy 
systems, so until this function is readily available , customers that 
require a receptionist will continue to go elsewhere.
Perhaps it is time to rethink the way data is exchanged between the CPU 
and the DSS/BLF?

As someone said a very long time ago:
Results, not excuses.

JMO

John Novack


Christian Stredicke wrote:


Well the problem with the sidecar is simple. Just try to light all
lights three times within one second. If you have 50 keys there is
already hell breaking loose. If you cascade side cars and say have 100
LED, this is a real Xmas tree. The CPU drowns in XML notifications. We
already had trouble, and we don't want to double it at this time. Good
work, IETF. 


BTW this is not only a problem if the phone. If the PBX has to supply 50
phones with 50 LED and e.g. they are going off hook at the same time, we
are talking about a burst of 50 * 50 = 2500 messages which will have
some impact of the PBX CPU as well. 


We need to do something about this first before we can start having 100
or 150 LED on a device.

Christian - yes I am from snom. 

 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
mustardman29

Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:47 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

So how did the Polycom with sidecars work?  I like the idea 
of a dedicated FOP display but not sure why you would need it 
if you have a Polycom with sidecars.


   


-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so many 
quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their other 
 

phones were 
   

of the poly variety. We installed a dedicated lcd running FOP for 
display. Receptionist was much happier.


One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on 
 

her desk.  
   


But then the snom would not ring.

On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:

 

Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need 
   


about 60...
   


Bob McDowell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
   


Of Darrell
 


Long
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.

Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation





Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
   


Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've
 


looked around
 

their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 
 

300, 320 and 
   


360.
The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to 
different extensions; am I missing something or is that
 


the phone and
 


you just do 12 per phone?

Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 


Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at
   


the best of
 


times.
(that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the
   


extension button.
 


*8 works fine)

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT
   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   



 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-29 Thread Jerry Jones
Because we still have to live with - the current - seven only  
limitation.


We have found that training generally results in folks understanding  
how to use a PBX vs a key system


For many years I installed large PBX systems, Rolms, ATT, Nortel, etc  
and often no blf/dss was available, or management did not wish to  
purchase. Users at first were unhappy, but got used to working with  
the PBX. In fact most had to give up key phones with lots of buttons/ 
lights and oonly had a stnadard 2500 set to do everything with.



On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:33 PM, mustardman29 wrote:

So how did the Polycom with sidecars work?  I like the idea of a  
dedicated
FOP display but not sure why you would need it if you have a  
Polycom with

sidecars.


-Original Message-
From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:28 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so
many quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their
other phones were of the poly variety. We installed a
dedicated lcd running FOP for display. Receptionist was much happier.

One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on her desk.
But then the snom would not ring.

On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:



Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need about 60...


Bob McDowell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Of Darrell

Long
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.

Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation





Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:

Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've

looked around

their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320 and
360.
The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to
different extensions; am I missing something or is that

the phone and

you just do 12 per phone?

Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at

the best of

times.
(that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the

extension button.

*8 works fine)

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-29 Thread mustardman29
I agree that some of these features which are considered quite basic on
legacy phone systems are a major weakness on the Asterisk system.  

It seems to me that more time should be put into getting the basics working
nicely rather than all the work going into the whiz bang bells and whistles.

Just an observation not a complaint.  I am not a coder so maybe I don't
understand some of the challenges.  


 -Original Message-
 From: John Novack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 6:08 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 The reality is, of course, that telephone systems have 
 provided this function for many years. A DSS/BLF is available 
 on MANY so called legacy systems, so until this function is 
 readily available , customers that require a receptionist 
 will continue to go elsewhere.
 Perhaps it is time to rethink the way data is exchanged 
 between the CPU and the DSS/BLF?
 As someone said a very long time ago:
 Results, not excuses.
 
 JMO
 
 John Novack
 
 
 Christian Stredicke wrote:
 
 Well the problem with the sidecar is simple. Just try to light all
 lights three times within one second. If you have 50 keys there is
 already hell breaking loose. If you cascade side cars and 
 say have 100
 LED, this is a real Xmas tree. The CPU drowns in XML 
 notifications. We
 already had trouble, and we don't want to double it at this 
 time. Good
 work, IETF. 
 
 BTW this is not only a problem if the phone. If the PBX has 
 to supply 50
 phones with 50 LED and e.g. they are going off hook at the 
 same time, we
 are talking about a burst of 50 * 50 = 2500 messages which will have
 some impact of the PBX CPU as well. 
 
 We need to do something about this first before we can start 
 having 100
 or 150 LED on a device.
 
 Christian - yes I am from snom. 
 
   
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 mustardman29
 Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:47 PM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 So how did the Polycom with sidecars work?  I like the idea 
 of a dedicated FOP display but not sure why you would need it 
 if you have a Polycom with sidecars.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:28 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so many 
 quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their other 
   
 
 phones were 
 
 
 of the poly variety. We installed a dedicated lcd running FOP for 
 display. Receptionist was much happier.
 
 One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on 
   
 
 her desk.  
 
 
 But then the snom would not ring.
 
 On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:
 
   
 
 Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need 
 
 
 about 60...
 
 
 Bob McDowell
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 
 
 Of Darrell
   
 
 Long
 Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
 
 Darrell S. Long
 BestWeb Corporation
 
   
 
 
 
 Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
 
 
 Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've
   
 
 looked around
   
 
 their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 
   
 
 300, 320 and 
 
 
 360.
 The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to 
 different extensions; am I missing something or is that
   
 
 the phone and
   
 
 you just do 12 per phone?
 
 Daniel
 
 On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   
 
 Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.
 
 Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at
 
 
 the best of
   
 
 times.
 (that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the
 
 
 extension button.
   
 
 *8 works fine)
 
 Paul Hales
 Technical Manager
 AsteriskIT
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
   
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-29 Thread mustardman29
Could you please explain this limitation.  Why would Polycom sell a sidecar
if it does not work or is this specific to Asterisk? 

 -Original Message-
 From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 8:05 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 Because we still have to live with - the current - seven only 
 limitation.
 
 We have found that training generally results in folks 
 understanding how to use a PBX vs a key system
 
 For many years I installed large PBX systems, Rolms, ATT, 
 Nortel, etc and often no blf/dss was available, or management 
 did not wish to purchase. Users at first were unhappy, but 
 got used to working with the PBX. In fact most had to give up 
 key phones with lots of buttons/ lights and oonly had a 
 stnadard 2500 set to do everything with.
 
 
 On Mar 28, 2006, at 7:33 PM, mustardman29 wrote:
 
  So how did the Polycom with sidecars work?  I like the idea of a 
  dedicated FOP display but not sure why you would need it if 
 you have a 
  Polycom with sidecars.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:28 AM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
  We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so many 
  quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their other phones 
  were of the poly variety. We installed a dedicated lcd running FOP 
  for display. Receptionist was much happier.
 
  One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on 
 her desk.
  But then the snom would not ring.
 
  On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:
 
 
  Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need 
 about 60...
 
 
  Bob McDowell
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
  Of Darrell
  Long
  Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
  The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
 
  Darrell S. Long
  BestWeb Corporation
 

 
 
 
  Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
  Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've
  looked around
  their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 
 300, 320 and 
  360.
  The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to 
  different extensions; am I missing something or is that
  the phone and
  you just do 12 per phone?
 
  Daniel
 
  On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.
 
  Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at
  the best of
  times.
  (that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the
  extension button.
  *8 works fine)
 
  Paul Hales
  Technical Manager
  AsteriskIT
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-29 Thread Douglas Garstang
 -Original Message-
 From: mustardman29 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:08 PM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 
 Could you please explain this limitation.  Why would Polycom 
 sell a sidecar
 if it does not work or is this specific to Asterisk? 

mustardman:
Here's a couple of email quotes from a discussion I had with a Polycom 
employee. If you'd like the full text of the email let me know and I can send 
it to you directly. You can quite clearly see it's a Polycom limitation. 
Others have reported being about to 'buddy' more than 7 extensions with other 
phones with Asterisk.

Douglas,

There is slated to be a large increase to the amount of buddies (48)
with sip 2.0 towards the end of May. At this time we have sip 1.6.5, but
it does not include any of those enhancements.

- and -

Yes at this time the limit is 7, but that should increase with newer
releases of software.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Bob McDowell

Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need about 60...


Bob McDowell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
Long
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.

Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation





Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
 Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked around
 their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320 and 360.
 The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to
 different extensions; am I missing something or is that the phone and
 you just do 12 per phone?

 Daniel

 On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

 Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at the best of
 times.
 (that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the extension button.
 *8 works fine)

 Paul Hales
 Technical Manager
 AsteriskIT

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Jerry Jones
We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so many  
quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their other phones  
were of the poly variety. We installed a dedicated lcd running FOP  
for display. Receptionist was much happier.


One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on her desk.  
But then the snom would not ring.


On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:



Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need about 60...


Bob McDowell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
Long
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.

Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation





Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:

Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked around
their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320 and  
360.

The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to
different extensions; am I missing something or is that the phone and
you just do 12 per phone?

Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at the best of
times.
(that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the extension button.
*8 works fine)

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Peer Oliver Schmidt
Bob McDowell wrote:
 Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need about 60... 
 
 
 Bob McDowell

42+12 is fairly near the 60 target.

-- 
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Bob McDowell

Very true.  I am currently debating whether or not to offer it as an
option for my employer's system.  As it currently stands, we do not have
everyone's extensions on a button.  With the snom 360 plus the expansion
we still don't have them all.  While I'm sure it would be 'better than
nothing' from my own point of view, it might also be setting up the
receptionist for a disappoint.  As this system is new, I'm working hard
to portray it as the 'limitless future', as opposed to the proprietary
and very limited system we were on before.  The receptionist not having
a sidecar is present my fault, due to lack of finding a good one.


Bob McDowell

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer
Oliver Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:50 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

Bob McDowell wrote:
 Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need about 60...


 Bob McDowell

42+12 is fairly near the 60 target.

--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
What I read on snom's website was the _currently_ only one sidecar  
can be hooked up at a time.  It sounds like they are working on  
getting multiple sidecars chained together but have not got all of  
the bugs worked out.  I am kind of in the same boat.  Our current  
system offers 60 buttons on the sidecar.  It is full but they already  
don't have everybody.  Talking to the receptionists (we have a split  
office setup, one on each side of the building) they figure it would  
not be hard for them to remove the extensions that are not used  
very much to get the number down to the 54 currently allowed on the  
snom phone.  Particularly since it is a short term solution.  I  
expect either snom to get multiple sidecars working fairly soon or  
polycom to get the issue with its 7-button limit figured out (or  
Asterisk, as the case may be), and then be able to upgrade their  
phones to an unlimited button phone.


And the price of the snom setup is not bad at all.  $235 for the  
phone and $140 for the expansion module = $375.   Not a hard sell to  
say that they may have to toss a $140 expansion module if they end  
up going with a different solution later.  The phone would still be  
perfectly good.


Daniel

On Mar 28, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:



Very true.  I am currently debating whether or not to offer it as an
option for my employer's system.  As it currently stands, we do not  
have
everyone's extensions on a button.  With the snom 360 plus the  
expansion

we still don't have them all.  While I'm sure it would be 'better than
nothing' from my own point of view, it might also be setting up the
receptionist for a disappoint.  As this system is new, I'm working  
hard

to portray it as the 'limitless future', as opposed to the proprietary
and very limited system we were on before.  The receptionist not  
having

a sidecar is present my fault, due to lack of finding a good one.


Bob McDowell


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread mustardman29
So how did the Polycom with sidecars work?  I like the idea of a dedicated
FOP display but not sure why you would need it if you have a Polycom with
sidecars.

 -Original Message-
 From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:28 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so 
 many quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their 
 other phones were of the poly variety. We installed a 
 dedicated lcd running FOP for display. Receptionist was much happier.
 
 One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on her desk.  
 But then the snom would not ring.
 
 On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:
 
 
  Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need about 60...
 
 
  Bob McDowell
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
 Of Darrell 
  Long
  Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
  The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
 
  Darrell S. Long
  BestWeb Corporation
 
  
 
 
 
  Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
  Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've 
 looked around 
  their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320 and 
  360.
  The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to 
  different extensions; am I missing something or is that 
 the phone and 
  you just do 12 per phone?
 
  Daniel
 
  On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.
 
  Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at 
 the best of 
  times.
  (that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the 
 extension button.
  *8 works fine)
 
  Paul Hales
  Technical Manager
  AsteriskIT
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Christian Stredicke
Well the problem with the sidecar is simple. Just try to light all
lights three times within one second. If you have 50 keys there is
already hell breaking loose. If you cascade side cars and say have 100
LED, this is a real Xmas tree. The CPU drowns in XML notifications. We
already had trouble, and we don't want to double it at this time. Good
work, IETF. 

BTW this is not only a problem if the phone. If the PBX has to supply 50
phones with 50 LED and e.g. they are going off hook at the same time, we
are talking about a burst of 50 * 50 = 2500 messages which will have
some impact of the PBX CPU as well. 

We need to do something about this first before we can start having 100
or 150 LED on a device.

Christian - yes I am from snom. 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 mustardman29
 Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:47 PM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 So how did the Polycom with sidecars work?  I like the idea 
 of a dedicated FOP display but not sure why you would need it 
 if you have a Polycom with sidecars.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:28 AM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
  
  We installed a snom with 3 sidecars. Kinda worked, but had so many 
  quirks they had us replace with a Polycom. All their other 
 phones were 
  of the poly variety. We installed a dedicated lcd running FOP for 
  display. Receptionist was much happier.
  
  One of the key problems was she like to set the handset on 
 her desk.  
  But then the snom would not ring.
  
  On Mar 28, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Bob McDowell wrote:
  
  
   Can you chain these to get more that 42 buttons?  I need 
 about 60...
  
  
   Bob McDowell
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
  Of Darrell
   Long
   Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:32 PM
   To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
   Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
  
   The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.
  
   Darrell S. Long
   BestWeb Corporation
  
 
  
  
  
   Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
   Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've
  looked around
   their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 
 300, 320 and 
   360.
   The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to 
   different extensions; am I missing something or is that
  the phone and
   you just do 12 per phone?
  
   Daniel
  
   On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.
  
   Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at
  the best of
   times.
   (that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the
  extension button.
   *8 works fine)
  
   Paul Hales
   Technical Manager
   AsteriskIT
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
  
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-28 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
For those of us that only need a small handful of these receptionist  
phones (for me it is 2), it should not be nearly as much of a  
problem, correct?  For example I only need 2 phones with 60 (well, I  
can get 54 atm, but would like to expand even more).  Assuming  
everybody picked up their phone at the same time that would only be  
180 (60 * 2, plus I am assuming some message to the phone that was  
picked up) messages.  I can't imagine putting a sidecar on every  
single phone.  If average joe really wants to know if somebody is on  
the phone they can log into a web page that will tell them the status  
of a phone.


Daniel - Good to hear that people from the manufacturing companies  
traffic these lists!


On Mar 28, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Christian Stredicke wrote:


Well the problem with the sidecar is simple. Just try to light all
lights three times within one second. If you have 50 keys there is
already hell breaking loose. If you cascade side cars and say have 100
LED, this is a real Xmas tree. The CPU drowns in XML notifications. We
already had trouble, and we don't want to double it at this time. Good
work, IETF.

BTW this is not only a problem if the phone. If the PBX has to  
supply 50
phones with 50 LED and e.g. they are going off hook at the same  
time, we

are talking about a burst of 50 * 50 = 2500 messages which will have
some impact of the PBX CPU as well.

We need to do something about this first before we can start having  
100

or 150 LED on a device.

Christian - yes I am from snom.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)

2006-03-27 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
	Thanks for all the comments on the 3Com phones.  Thankfully, there  
is a large number of phones out there to dig through looking for the  
right solution.


	What I have not been able to find, after spending all weekend  
looking, is a good solution for an attendant console.  We have 2  
receptionists that need to be able to view all 60+ phones (we could  
probably weed it down a bit if we had to, but would like to be able  
to cover all the phones) and see who is on the phone already.  I  
would like to avoid a software solution as those tend to be confusing  
and hard for non-computer savvy people to deal with.  I have seen  
that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only for up to 7 phones.


	Does anybody have a recommendation for a solution for this?  I find  
it hard to believe that nobody makes a compatible phone (or add-on)  
that is compatible with Asterisk.  It seems like such a common thing.


Daniel Hazelbaker

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)

2006-03-27 Thread Darrell Long
We would be interested in the same. We have had only limited success 
getting Snom's phones to do this. And, you're right, this is such a 
common thing, there MUST be something out there that can do the job.


Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation

 	  




Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Thanks for all the comments on the 3Com phones. Thankfully, there is a 
large number of phones out there to dig through looking for the right 
solution.


What I have not been able to find, after spending all weekend looking, 
is a good solution for an attendant console. We have 2 receptionists 
that need to be able to view all 60+ phones (we could probably weed it 
down a bit if we had to, but would like to be able to cover all the 
phones) and see who is on the phone already. I would like to avoid a 
software solution as those tend to be confusing and hard for 
non-computer savvy people to deal with. I have seen that the polycom 
setup (601+sidecar) works but only for up to 7 phones.


Does anybody have a recommendation for a solution for this? I find it 
hard to believe that nobody makes a compatible phone (or add-on) that 
is compatible with Asterisk. It seems like such a common thing.


Daniel Hazelbaker

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)

2006-03-27 Thread Curt Shaffer

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Hazelbaker
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 1:32 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)

Thanks for all the comments on the 3Com phones.  Thankfully, there  
is a large number of phones out there to dig through looking for the  
right solution.

What I have not been able to find, after spending all weekend  
looking, is a good solution for an attendant console.  We have 2  
receptionists that need to be able to view all 60+ phones (we could  
probably weed it down a bit if we had to, but would like to be able  
to cover all the phones) and see who is on the phone already.  I  
would like to avoid a software solution as those tend to be confusing  
and hard for non-computer savvy people to deal with.  I have seen  
that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only for up to 7 phones.

Does anybody have a recommendation for a solution for this?  I find

it hard to believe that nobody makes a compatible phone (or add-on)  
that is compatible with Asterisk.  It seems like such a common thing.

Daniel Hazelbaker

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Have you looked that the flash operator panel?

http://www.asternic.org/demo.html

I know you mentioned not wanting a software solution because of confusion
but I think that would be pretty easy to understand. 

Curt

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)

2006-03-27 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
We may end up using a software solution, but there are two main  
issues with a software solution (for us at least):


1) For us in particular, our receptionists have ALWAYS (for the past  
15 years at least) used a physical switchboard style for routing  
and seeing availability.  From past hardware-software changes we  
know that it will be very frustrating for them.  For us, it is much  
more worth it to spend $1,000 to buy each of the two receptionists a  
really nice phone that supports these features rather than get a  
cheap software (though very nice) solution.


2) Having a software solution can cause grief and frustration to an  
already overworked receptionist.  Just a few examples (these are not  
as uncommon as one might think): User quits web browser after  
finishing looking something up on-line, doesn't realize they just  
closed out their switchboard until they need it and it is not there.   
User gets lost trying to find the right window while trying to not  
sound like an idiot to the person on the phone.  Computer has frozen,  
or otherwise has problems, and must be rebooted.


I do like the look of Asternic, it is very old-style and easy to  
get used to, but we would still prefer a hardware solution if  
possible.  We may end up having to say, sorry but you need to deal  
with this for a while until some bugs in the system are resolved  
(i.e. the 7 line problem), but as soon as a hardware solution is  
available we will switch you back to it.  Hopefully we can find  
something before we switch, but if not it is good to know that  
software solutions are a viable alternative.




Have you looked that the flash operator panel?

http://www.asternic.org/demo.html

I know you mentioned not wanting a software solution because of  
confusion

but I think that would be pretty easy to understand.

Curt

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones (was 3Com Phones)

2006-03-27 Thread Justin Moore
On 3/27/06, Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have seen that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only for up to 7 
 phones

From what I've seen, each sidecar supports up to 14 additional
stations. Three of those along with the 5 buttons on the 601 comes up
to 47 on my calculator. Is there a known problem with the 601+sidecars
and * that prevents the user from being able to monitor more than 7
extensions?

Just curious as I've been leaning toward this for our receptionist as
well (only 12 extensions to monitor...)

--
Justin Moore
aka wantmoore
---
www.wantmoore.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that  
(wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying  
that an issue with Asterisk prevents you from monitoring more than 7  
total (not per sidecar) extensions.


Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Justin Moore wrote:


On 3/27/06, Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only  
for up to 7 phones


From what I've seen, each sidecar supports up to 14 additional
stations. Three of those along with the 5 buttons on the 601 comes up
to 47 on my calculator. Is there a known problem with the 601+sidecars
and * that prevents the user from being able to monitor more than 7
extensions?

Just curious as I've been leaning toward this for our receptionist as
well (only 12 extensions to monitor...)

--
Justin Moore
aka wantmoore
---
www.wantmoore.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread pdhales
Using a Snom phone, you can monitor a lot more extensions, so I figure it's
got to be a Polycom issue.

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones


 Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that
 (wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying
 that an issue with Asterisk prevents you from monitoring more than 7
 total (not per sidecar) extensions.

 Daniel

 On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Justin Moore wrote:

  On 3/27/06, Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have seen that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only
  for up to 7 phones
 
  From what I've seen, each sidecar supports up to 14 additional
  stations. Three of those along with the 5 buttons on the 601 comes up
  to 47 on my calculator. Is there a known problem with the 601+sidecars
  and * that prevents the user from being able to monitor more than 7
  extensions?
 
  Just curious as I've been leaning toward this for our receptionist as
  well (only 12 extensions to monitor...)
 
  --
  Justin Moore
  aka wantmoore
  ---
  www.wantmoore.com
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread Darrell Long
Do you have experience with the Snom phones? We have not had much 
success getting them to work under Asterisk as a receptionist phone. 
Specifically, the ability to monitor and pick up calls ringing on other 
extensions has been a problem.


Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation

 	 



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Using a Snom phone, you can monitor a lot more extensions, so I figure it's
got to be a Polycom issue.

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones


 

Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that
(wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying
that an issue with Asterisk prevents you from monitoring more than 7
total (not per sidecar) extensions.

Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Justin Moore wrote:

   

On 3/27/06, Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

I have seen that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only
for up to 7 phones
   

From what I've seen, each sidecar supports up to 14 additional
stations. Three of those along with the 5 buttons on the 601 comes up
to 47 on my calculator. Is there a known problem with the 601+sidecars
and * that prevents the user from being able to monitor more than 7
extensions?

Just curious as I've been leaning toward this for our receptionist as
well (only 12 extensions to monitor...)

--
Justin Moore
aka wantmoore
---
www.wantmoore.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread pdhales
Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at the best of times.
(that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the extension button. *8
works fine)

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT

- Original Message - 
From: Darrell Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones


 Do you have experience with the Snom phones? We have not had much
 success getting them to work under Asterisk as a receptionist phone.
 Specifically, the ability to monitor and pick up calls ringing on other
 extensions has been a problem.

 Darrell S. Long
 BestWeb Corporation




 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Using a Snom phone, you can monitor a lot more extensions, so I figure
it's
 got to be a Polycom issue.
 
 Paul Hales
 Technical Manager
 AsteriskIT
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:28 AM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones
 
 
 
 Yes, I keep reading on the mailing list archives and the wikis that
 (wether or not it is indeed a Asterisk issue) Polycom keeps saying
 that an issue with Asterisk prevents you from monitoring more than 7
 total (not per sidecar) extensions.
 
 Daniel
 
 On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Justin Moore wrote:
 
 
 On 3/27/06, Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have seen that the polycom setup (601+sidecar) works but only
 for up to 7 phones
 
 From what I've seen, each sidecar supports up to 14 additional
 stations. Three of those along with the 5 buttons on the 601 comes up
 to 47 on my calculator. Is there a known problem with the 601+sidecars
 and * that prevents the user from being able to monitor more than 7
 extensions?
 
 Just curious as I've been leaning toward this for our receptionist as
 well (only 12 extensions to monitor...)
 
 --
 Justin Moore
 aka wantmoore
 ---
 www.wantmoore.com
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread Daniel Hazelbaker
Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this?  I've looked  
around their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320  
and 360.  The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can  
assign to different extensions; am I missing something or is that the  
phone and you just do 12 per phone?


Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at the best of  
times.
(that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the extension  
button. *8

works fine)

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread pdhales
You can get an extension module that adds another 42 buttons.

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Hazelbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones


 Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this?  I've looked
 around their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320
 and 360.  The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can
 assign to different extensions; am I missing something or is that the
 phone and you just do 12 per phone?

 Daniel

 On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.
 
  Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at the best of
  times.
  (that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the extension
  button. *8
  works fine)
 
  Paul Hales
  Technical Manager
  AsteriskIT

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist Phones

2006-03-27 Thread Darrell Long

The 360 has an expansion unit. It adds 42 extensions.

Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation

 	  




Daniel Hazelbaker wrote:
Hmm, which phone from Snom are you using for this? I've looked around 
their website and I can only find 3 VoIP phones, the 300, 320 and 360. 
The 360 by the looks of it only has 12 buttons you can assign to 
different extensions; am I missing something or is that the phone and 
you just do 12 per phone?


Daniel

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Yes - set up about 10 of them at a business last year.

Monitoring is fine - picking up calls is a bit iffy at the best of 
times.

(that is, picking up a ringing call by pushing the extension button. *8
works fine)

Paul Hales
Technical Manager
AsteriskIT


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Receptionist phones

2005-11-09 Thread Bill Gibbs








Ive been playing with Asterisk for a few weeks and its
working great.



I have a question about getting multi-line receptionist phones
working.



I was thinking about getting one of these expansion ports:



http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_data_sheet09186a008008883d.html



What are people using for receptionist phones that show all
the extensions in use, etc? Is that even possible with Asterisk right now?



Anyone play around with this thing yet?



Bill






___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist phones

2005-11-09 Thread Bill Gibbs








Nevermind I found a note about Hint
which can be used for this purpose.



Bill











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005
11:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Receptionist phones





Ive been playing with Asterisk for a few weeks and
its working great.



I have a question about getting multi-line receptionist
phones working.



I was thinking about getting one of these expansion ports:



http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_data_sheet09186a008008883d.html



What are people using for receptionist phones that show all
the extensions in use, etc? Is that even possible with Asterisk right
now?



Anyone play around with this thing yet?



Bill






___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist phones

2005-11-09 Thread Colin Anderson








The SNOM
320s with 12 buttons work fine and they are relatively inexpensive, although
the indications are not as fine grained as on the Cisco. Basically light on=in use,
light off=not in use. 



You get
into diminishing returns on the value of a line indicator sidecar in inverse proportion
to the number of users. On our Mitel sets, we have a double daisy-chained
sidecar with 64 lights. Its stupid, confusing, and messy as hell. My strategy
has been to emphasize the use of DIDs + IVR for the staff so the bulk of calls
never hit reception. One of the receptionists balked when I took away her
sidecar, and told her that if she wanted to transfer a call, she would have to
enter Transfer + 4 digit DID. I reasoned with her and told her that every
single call in the company can come through her and she could transfer each one
with a sidecar (300-400 calls a day) or she could use this DID method, and I
would guarantee that her call volume would drop to ~80 calls a day, max. She
saw the light, and shes been happy ever since. 



Your
company culture, however, will dictate your approach.



Reason Im
down on sidecars is that in a medium to large organization they are not
practical. Especially one, like the one I work in, where there is high staff
churn, we were constantly futzing with the sidecar. 



hth



-Original
Message-
From: Bill Gibbs
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005
9:52 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Receptionist phones



Ive
been playing with Asterisk for a few weeks and its working great.



I have
a question about getting multi-line receptionist phones working.



I was
thinking about getting one of these expansion ports:



http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_data_sheet09186a008008883d.html



What
are people using for receptionist phones that show all the extensions in use,
etc? Is that even possible with Asterisk right now?



Anyone
play around with this thing yet?



Bill






___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist phones

2005-11-09 Thread Chris Bagnall
 I have a question about getting multi-line receptionist 
 phones working.
 I was thinking about getting one of these expansion ports:
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_d
 ata_sheet09186a008008883d.html
 What are people using for receptionist phones that show all 
 the extensions in use, etc?  Is that even possible with 
 Asterisk right now?

Is there a list of phones with working hint support being maintained
anywhere? We have an install coming up in a few weeks where there will be a
requirement similar to Bill Gibbs' for a pair of multi-line receptionist
phones. The client is rather reluctant to spend the many £ on the 7960+7914
given that they'll be frequently used by temp staff in an environment where
they're not likely to get the loving care phones of that price deserve.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist phones

2005-11-09 Thread pdhales



With CVS, you also get a flashing led when the 
phone is ringing.

PaulH

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Colin Anderson 
  To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
  Non-Commercial Discussion' 
  Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:24 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 
  Receptionist phones
  
  
  The 
  SNOM 320’s with 12 buttons work fine and they are relatively inexpensive, 
  although the indications are not as fine grained as on the Cisco. Basically 
  light on=in use, light off=not in use. 
  
  You 
  get into diminishing returns on the value of a line indicator sidecar in 
  inverse proportion to the number of users. On our Mitel sets, we have a double 
  daisy-chained sidecar with 64 lights. It’s stupid, confusing, and messy as 
  hell. My strategy has been to emphasize the use of DID’s + IVR for the staff 
  so the bulk of calls never hit reception. One of the receptionists balked when 
  I took away her sidecar, and told her that if she wanted to transfer a call, 
  she would have to enter Transfer + 4 digit DID. I reasoned with her and told 
  her that every single call in the company can come through her and she could 
  transfer each one with a sidecar (300-400 calls a day) or she could use this 
  DID method, and I would guarantee that her call volume would drop to ~80 calls 
  a day, max. She saw the light, and she’s been happy ever since. 
  
  
  Your 
  company culture, however, will dictate your 
  approach.
  
  Reason 
  I’m down on sidecars is that in a medium to large organization they are not 
  practical. Especially one, like the one I work in, where there is high staff 
  churn, we were constantly futzing with the sidecar. 
  
  
  hth
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Bill Gibbs 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:52 
  AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing 
  List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: [Asterisk-Users] Receptionist 
  phones
  
  I’ve 
  been playing with Asterisk for a few weeks and it’s working 
  great.
  
  I have 
  a question about getting multi-line receptionist phones 
  working.
  
  I was 
  thinking about getting one of these expansion ports:
  
  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_data_sheet09186a008008883d.html
  
  What 
  are people using for receptionist phones that show all the extensions in use, 
  etc? Is that even possible with Asterisk right now?
  
  Anyone 
  play around with this thing yet?
  
  Bill
  
  

  ___--Bandwidth and 
  Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing 
  listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
  UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users