[Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
I installed the flash operator panel and I also installed the flash-shockwave in my mozilla browser. I followed the read me instructions in the Flash operator and made the changes to the op_server.pl but when I run the browser I get transferring data and just sits there. I don't see anything being transferred. If any body has used this software please tell me what am I doing wrong. I copied the two files from the html directory to /var/www/html/panel directory which is the web root. I also changed the manager.conf file and created a user ID and secret which I specified in the op_server.pl. Thanks, ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
Hi again :) Can you give me a URL for the software you mentioned? Cheers, Steve On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:45:47AM -0400, Jain, Sonal wrote: I installed the flash operator panel and I also installed the flash-shockwave in my mozilla browser. I followed the read me instructions in the Flash operator and made the changes to the op_server.pl but when I run the browser I get transferring data and just sits there. I don't see anything being transferred. If any body has used this software please tell me what am I doing wrong. I copied the two files from the html directory to /var/www/html/panel directory which is the web root. I also changed the manager.conf file and created a user ID and secret which I specified in the op_server.pl. Thanks, ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Steve Foy| http://www.unite.net UNITE Solutions | Tel: 028 9077 7338 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
ok this is what I did I moved all to my /var/www/html/control. did the changes is my files and used the copy of manager.conf. I started asterisk and did /var/www/html/control/op_server.pl and pointed my browser to 192.168.0.1/control/html ... had the same problem. Then I went and set debug to 1 in op_server(did not help cant read the lang?). So I made the dir /var/www/html/wtf and moved the 2 files in the html dir to here,restarted asterisk and /var/www/html/control/op_server.p and pointed my browser to 192.168.0.1/wtf and wtf it worked,now Im not talking about the transfer and hangup?? here is my conf ## # CONFIGURATION # # parameters to connect to Asterisk Manager my $manager_host = 192.168.0.1; my $manager_user = altus; my $manager_secret = altus; # # parameters for the op_server my $web_hostname = 192.168.0.1; # must be the same address you use to contact the web server my $listen_port = 4445; my $security_code = 'd39i393kd'; # secret code for performing hangups and transfers # # location of variables.txt needed by the flash applet # (must be the same directory as the web page and swf file) my $flash_dir = /var/www/html/wtf/; # # Debug level to stdot my $debug = 1; On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:45, Jain, Sonal wrote: I installed the flash operator panel and I also installed the flash-shockwave in my mozilla browser. I followed the read me instructions in the Flash operator and made the changes to the op_server.pl but when I run the browser I get transferring data and just sits there. I don't see anything being transferred. If any body has used this software please tell me what am I doing wrong. I copied the two files from the html directory to /var/www/html/panel directory which is the web root. I also changed the manager.conf file and created a user ID and secret which I specified in the . Thanks, ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
http://sip.house.com.ar/operator/ On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 16:01, Steve Foy wrote: Hi again :) Can you give me a URL for the software you mentioned? Cheers, Steve On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:45:47AM -0400, Jain, Sonal wrote: I installed the flash operator panel and I also installed the flash-shockwave in my mozilla browser. I followed the read me instructions in the Flash operator and made the changes to the op_server.pl but when I run the browser I get transferring data and just sits there. I don't see anything being transferred. If any body has used this software please tell me what am I doing wrong. I copied the two files from the html directory to /var/www/html/panel directory which is the web root. I also changed the manager.conf file and created a user ID and secret which I specified in the op_server.pl. Thanks, ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
I agree. Besides think of how much more marketable it would be if you could implement a solution for a client where they would be able to do some of the more simple changes on their own without incurring an expense. When they need real work done to their box then they'd call in the experts. Why must everyone criticize each others work so harshly. Why not just say, hey nice gui and keep their elitist comments to themselves. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Lambert Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:55:25PM -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: So why not just open vi and bang out a conf file?How is a newbie ever not gonna be a newbie with a GUI config? Why limit the range of configuration options? I mean, what about people who know vi sucks and emacs rules? Besides, wouldn't it be even better for the newbie to just fire up ex and bang out their own telephony application? It will match their requirements more closely. There is nothing wrong with lowering the bar to entry. When they run into things the GUI does not handle, they will be more likely to pop open a nedit window and find the effort worthwhile since they have already learned that Asterisk is worth having around. Or do you disagree with the concept of Linux distributions too? Wouldn't the newbie be better off downloading all the individual parts, from the FTP servers like we used to back in '92? Besides, if we are ever to have a fully configurable GUI, we will probably have to suffer along with a partial solution until someone who needs more flexibility and has the skills, enhances the existing tool. Besides, wouldn't it be in *your* best interest to volunteer to help fix up the GUI to make sure it is dead simple for a newbie to install a precompiled package, pop open a web browser and sign up for a /*your company here*/ account or twenty? You *can* still use vi when you make changes to your own configs. No-one wants to take that right away from you. Good luck, your gonna need it, I disagree with your attitude. I hope for your sake, you don't take that attitude with your prospective customers. But hey! You are free to have your own personality. BTW, do you edit your sendmail.cf files directly? Or do you wuss out and edit sendmail.mc instead? BTW, it is not germane to my point that you may be running some other MTA instead. I prefer to run postfix myself. Gary wrote: I tend to agree with Steven on this... If the web form makes it easier for the newbies why not, its just another option It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i meant dummies:-) interface Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
I think it's a good start, and would be willing to work on expanding the concept. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan VanHerpen Sent: June 26, 2003 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
I tend to agree with Steven on this... If the web form makes it easier for the newbies why not, its just another option It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i meant dummies:-) interface Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
So why not just open vi and bang out a conf file?How is a newbie ever not gonna be a newbie with a GUI config? Good luck, your gonna need it, Jeremy McNamara Gary wrote: I tend to agree with Steven on this... If the web form makes it easier for the newbies why not, its just another option It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i meant dummies:-) interface Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
Well, for *, I fall into the newbie category (not for telephony, VOIP, Internet, *NIX, C, etc - those I've been doing since the Internet had 3 nodes :-) and each technology mentioned was a newborn) I believe making it easy for folks to enter the * world will do nothing but sell Digium products, expand/improve *, etc. Keeping it in a 'you have to be an expert hacker' world will not. I personally would assist in a PHP (I assume) web GUI effort, and will definitely contribute 'simple' but complete mini-examples of conf files for * - that seems to be something lacking at present for a newbie like myself. And - yes - I've read the manual from end-to-end several times already :-) My testbed is a dual Xeon RedHat box (shows as a 4 CPU setup to top), tomorrow should provide a 4 FXS card and an FXO card and I have a fully deployed H.323 VOIP environment (Altigen) to play with. I'll snag a PRI card after I get things squared away - * will be my PBX backup to the Altigen until such a time as it proves itself superior... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk I tend to agree with Steven on this... If the web form makes it easier for the newbies why not, its just another option It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i meant dummies:-) interface Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
Actually. I am more thinking towards a USER rather than an ADMINISTRATOR We are looking at putting asterisk on similar to an embedded platform, and providing a USER interface so they can alter PART of the dialplan. Very simplified, (which of course makes the actual code complicated). More along the lines of instead of dialing 9 for this change it to 7 and let them choose the extension numbers to dial their sip phones etc., etc., What I think must be remembered, is that not all people using asterisk have the brains, knowledge or even desire to deal with asterisk, they just want to plug a box in and have it work... Also consider the large increase in the number of newbies to the list, I dare say its probably close to the time that a support forum is setup so they can actually find what they need by looking thru a more structured listing than an email list can provide. If enough people respond OFFLIST to me, I will again set one up :-) Gary On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 20:55:25 -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: So why not just open vi and bang out a conf file?How is a newbie ever not gonna be a newbie with a GUI config? Good luck, your gonna need it, Jeremy McNamara Gary wrote: I tend to agree with Steven on this... If the web form makes it easier for the newbies why not, its just another option It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i meant dummies:-) interface Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:55:25PM -0400, Jeremy McNamara wrote: So why not just open vi and bang out a conf file?How is a newbie ever not gonna be a newbie with a GUI config? Why limit the range of configuration options? I mean, what about people who know vi sucks and emacs rules? Besides, wouldn't it be even better for the newbie to just fire up ex and bang out their own telephony application? It will match their requirements more closely. There is nothing wrong with lowering the bar to entry. When they run into things the GUI does not handle, they will be more likely to pop open a nedit window and find the effort worthwhile since they have already learned that Asterisk is worth having around. Or do you disagree with the concept of Linux distributions too? Wouldn't the newbie be better off downloading all the individual parts, from the FTP servers like we used to back in '92? Besides, if we are ever to have a fully configurable GUI, we will probably have to suffer along with a partial solution until someone who needs more flexibility and has the skills, enhances the existing tool. Besides, wouldn't it be in *your* best interest to volunteer to help fix up the GUI to make sure it is dead simple for a newbie to install a precompiled package, pop open a web browser and sign up for a /*your company here*/ account or twenty? You *can* still use vi when you make changes to your own configs. No-one wants to take that right away from you. Good luck, your gonna need it, I disagree with your attitude. I hope for your sake, you don't take that attitude with your prospective customers. But hey! You are free to have your own personality. BTW, do you edit your sendmail.cf files directly? Or do you wuss out and edit sendmail.mc instead? BTW, it is not germane to my point that you may be running some other MTA instead. I prefer to run postfix myself. Gary wrote: I tend to agree with Steven on this... If the web form makes it easier for the newbies why not, its just another option It could even be expanded to be a dialplan for dunnies (woops, i meant dummies:-) interface Considering all it is, is an interface to write out a .conf file On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:04:28 -0700, Steven P. Donegan wrote: I disagree - for many tasks a GUI would be just fine, for others direct coding would do the trick. They do not have to be mutually exclusive. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McNamara Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Web interface for Asterisk That GUI is going to dramaticly limit the flexibility of your config. The only way you can make a GUI config work with Asterisk is if you have a very very specific task you want to accomplish, but even then you still will have issues as your requirements change with time. Stick with what the AstGod has bestowed upon us It will save you many headaches. Jeremy McNamara Dylan VanHerpen wrote: Hi everybody, I've been tinkering with a web based interface for Asterisk. I tried to stick as closely to the current configuration format as possible. The web interface should help to do things a little easier (sort by extension, context, do bulk changes). www.packetbell.com/asterisk Feedback appreciated! Dylan. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users . ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
