Re: [asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge of

2006-11-17 Thread Victor Toofic
El vie, nov 17 de 2006 a las 04:34 +0530, Vicky comentaba:
 Thats really strange .. if you have made canreinvite=no then it should not
 even attampt native bridging and should transcode codecs ..something's fishy
 here .. Also try to put canreinvite=no in testulaw exntension too .

So why do I have audio in both ways using 2 IP Phones with 2 different
codecs and getting 'Attempting native bridging' at the same time?

I've always had canreinvite=no in all my extensions. This is my sip.conf:

[testgsm]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testgsm
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=gsm

[testulaw]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testulaw
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=ulaw

[testalaw]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testalaw
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=alaw

[testg723]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testg723
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=g723

[testg729]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testg729
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=g729

[1001]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=1001
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=g729

[1010]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=1010
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=ulaw

Thanks again!
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge of

2006-11-16 Thread Vicky

g729 is not a free codec . YOu have to buy it from digium at rateof $10 per
channel license . If you are just using asterisk and havent bought g729
license then asterisk will just do bridging of g729 and wont edit/transcode
stream .

On 16/11/06, Victor Toofic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I have the following scenario:

   g729gsm
  UAS --- * --- UAC

I am using sipp to generate the calls between the UAC and the UAS and
sending some rtp from the UAC, I want * to do transcoding but as I see
it is not. As long as I know 'Attempting native bridge' means only
passing-through the rtp ¿Am I wrong?

The UAC and UAS are registering with * properly:

--- sip.conf 
[testgsm]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testgsm
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=gsm

[testg729]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testg729
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=g729
-

-
dspam*CLI sip show peers
Name/username  HostDyn Nat ACL Port Status
testgsm/testgsm172.16.51.244D  1 Unmonitored
testg729/testg729  172.16.51.244D  2 Unmonitored

-- Executing Answer(SIP/testgsm-081784b0, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(SIP/testgsm-081784b0, 1) in new stack
-- Executing Dial(SIP/testgsm-081784b0, SIP/testg729) in new stack
-- Called testg729
-- SIP/testg729-0817dd90 is ringing
-- SIP/testg729-0817dd90 answered SIP/testgsm-081784b0
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/testgsm-081784b0 and
SIP/testg729-0817dd90
-

After the call is established the UAC is sending some RTP captured in a
pcap file in gsm:

-- tcpdump -T rtp udp ---
15:58:31.868404 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33
c3
15:58:31.868676 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20
c18
15:58:31.895551 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33
c3
15:58:31.895775 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20
c18
15:58:31.936468 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33
c3
15:58:31.936477 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33
c3
15:58:31.936711 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20
c18
15:58:31.936908 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20
c18
-

Is there something wrong within the SDP? or Am I doing something wrong?
Any
comments would be appreciated.. thanks!!

P.S. I am using Asterisk 1.2.12.1 if that matters.

--
Greetings...
Víctor Toofic



--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message sent:

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:34836
Max-Forwards: 70
Subject: Performance Test
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length:  138

v=0
o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.51.244
s=-
c=IN IP4 172.16.51.244
t=0 0
m=audio 10001 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:18 GSM/8000

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message received [404] bytes :

SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0;received=
172.16.51.244
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message received [609] bytes :

SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0;received=
172.16.51.244
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=as14685910
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 161

v=0
o=root 3567 3567 IN IP4 172.16.51.215
s=session
c=IN IP4 172.16.51.215
t=0 0
m=audio 17050 RTP/AVP 18
a=rtpmap:18 GSM/8000
a=silenceSupp:off - - - -

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message sent:

ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-5
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=as14685910
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 ACK
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:34836
Max-Forwards: 70
Subject: Performance Test

Re: [asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge of

2006-11-16 Thread Victor Toofic
El jue, nov 16 de 2006 a las 18:28 +0530, Vicky comentaba:
 g729 is not a free codec . YOu have to buy it from digium at rateof $10 per
 channel license . If you are just using asterisk and havent bought g729
 license then asterisk will just do bridging of g729 and wont edit/transcode
 stream .
 
 On 16/11/06, Victor Toofic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have the following scenario:
 
g729gsm
   UAS --- * --- UAC
 
 I am using sipp to generate the calls between the UAC and the UAS and
 sending some rtp from the UAC, I want * to do transcoding but as I see
 it is not. As long as I know 'Attempting native bridge' means only
 passing-through the rtp ¿Am I wrong?

I get the same message even if I'm not using g729:

 --Attempting native bridge of SIP/testgsm-081784b0 and SIP/testulaw-0817da80

ulawgsm
   UAS --- * --- UAC

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge of

2006-11-16 Thread Victor Toofic
El jue, nov 16 de 2006 a las 11:35 -0600, Victor Toofic comentaba:
 El jue, nov 16 de 2006 a las 18:28 +0530, Vicky comentaba:
  g729 is not a free codec . YOu have to buy it from digium at rateof $10 per
  channel license . If you are just using asterisk and havent bought g729
  license then asterisk will just do bridging of g729 and wont edit/transcode
  stream .
  
  On 16/11/06, Victor Toofic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I have the following scenario:
  
 g729gsm
UAS --- * --- UAC
  
  I am using sipp to generate the calls between the UAC and the UAS and
  sending some rtp from the UAC, I want * to do transcoding but as I see
  it is not. As long as I know 'Attempting native bridge' means only
  passing-through the rtp ¿Am I wrong?
 
 I get the same message even if I'm not using g729:
 
  --Attempting native bridge of SIP/testgsm-081784b0 and SIP/testulaw-0817da80
 
 ulawgsm
UAS --- * --- UAC
 

Ok, sorry for insist. I have registered two ip phones using
differents codecs (ulaw  g729) and I have audio in both ways, so * is
doing transcoding. But I am still getting the log 'Attempting native
bridge of'.. so I wonder, What does that really mean?

Thanks!!
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge of

2006-11-16 Thread Vicky

Thats really strange .. if you have made canreinvite=no then it should not
even attampt native bridging and should transcode codecs ..something's fishy
here .. Also try to put canreinvite=no in testulaw exntension too .

On 16/11/06, Victor Toofic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


El jue, nov 16 de 2006 a las 18:28 +0530, Vicky comentaba:
 g729 is not a free codec . YOu have to buy it from digium at rateof $10
per
 channel license . If you are just using asterisk and havent bought g729
 license then asterisk will just do bridging of g729 and wont
edit/transcode
 stream .

 On 16/11/06, Victor Toofic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have the following scenario:
 
g729gsm
   UAS --- * --- UAC
 
 I am using sipp to generate the calls between the UAC and the UAS and
 sending some rtp from the UAC, I want * to do transcoding but as I see
 it is not. As long as I know 'Attempting native bridge' means only
 passing-through the rtp ¿Am I wrong?

I get the same message even if I'm not using g729:

--Attempting native bridge of SIP/testgsm-081784b0 and
SIP/testulaw-0817da80

ulawgsm
   UAS --- * --- UAC

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge of

2006-11-15 Thread Victor Toofic
I have the following scenario:

   g729gsm
  UAS --- * --- UAC

I am using sipp to generate the calls between the UAC and the UAS and
sending some rtp from the UAC, I want * to do transcoding but as I see
it is not. As long as I know 'Attempting native bridge' means only
passing-through the rtp ¿Am I wrong?

The UAC and UAS are registering with * properly:

--- sip.conf 
[testgsm]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testgsm
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=gsm

[testg729]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=testg729
context=astertest
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=g729
-

-
dspam*CLI sip show peers
Name/username  HostDyn Nat ACL Port Status
testgsm/testgsm172.16.51.244D  1 Unmonitored
testg729/testg729  172.16.51.244D  2 Unmonitored

-- Executing Answer(SIP/testgsm-081784b0, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(SIP/testgsm-081784b0, 1) in new stack
-- Executing Dial(SIP/testgsm-081784b0, SIP/testg729) in new stack
-- Called testg729
-- SIP/testg729-0817dd90 is ringing
-- SIP/testg729-0817dd90 answered SIP/testgsm-081784b0
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/testgsm-081784b0 and SIP/testg729-0817dd90
-

After the call is established the UAC is sending some RTP captured in a
pcap file in gsm:

-- tcpdump -T rtp udp ---
15:58:31.868404 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33 c3 
15:58:31.868676 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20 c18
15:58:31.895551 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33 c3 
15:58:31.895775 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20 c18
15:58:31.936468 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33 c3 
15:58:31.936477 IP 172.16.51.244.10001  172.16.51.215.17050: udp/rtp 33 c3 
15:58:31.936711 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20 c18
15:58:31.936908 IP 172.16.51.215.15424  172.16.51.244.20001: udp/rtp 20 c18
-

Is there something wrong within the SDP? or Am I doing something wrong? Any
comments would be appreciated.. thanks!!

P.S. I am using Asterisk 1.2.12.1 if that matters.

--
Greetings...
Víctor Toofic

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message sent:

INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:34836
Max-Forwards: 70
Subject: Performance Test
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length:  138

v=0
o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.51.244
s=-
c=IN IP4 172.16.51.244
t=0 0
m=audio 10001 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:18 GSM/8000

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message received [404] bytes :

SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0;received=172.16.51.244
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message received [609] bytes :

SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-0;received=172.16.51.244
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=as14685910
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 161

v=0
o=root 3567 3567 IN IP4 172.16.51.215
s=session
c=IN IP4 172.16.51.215
t=0 0
m=audio 17050 RTP/AVP 18
a=rtpmap:18 GSM/8000
a=silenceSupp:off - - - -

--- 2006-11-15 16:15:12
UDP message sent:

ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-5
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=as14685910
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1 ACK
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:34836
Max-Forwards: 70
Subject: Performance Test
Content-Length: 0

--- 2006-11-15 16:16:15
UDP message sent:

BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.51.244:34836;branch=z9hG4bK-1-9
From: testgsm sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=1
To: testg729 sip:[EMAIL 

[asterisk-users] attempting native bridge on TDM2400

2006-10-24 Thread Lenz

Hello list,
I am encountering a bit of a problem in working with incoming calls with a  
TDM2400 and * 1.2.4; when a call comes in, * will correctly detect the  
ringing, but will sometimes report multiple Attempting native bridge.  
What I do is basically that when a call comes in, I dial a different box  
through the same Zaptel interface and I get logs like this:


[call comes in]
   -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/10-1'
Oct 24 16:55:46 NOTICE[8457]: chan_zap.c:6063 ss_thread: Got event 18  
(Ring Begin)...
Oct 24 16:55:47 NOTICE[8457]: chan_zap.c:6063 ss_thread: Got event 2  
(Ring/Answered)...

  -- Executing Dial(Zap/10-1, Zap/g1|90|t) in new stack
-- Called g1
-- Zap/1-1 is ringing
-- Zap/1-1 is ringing
-- Zap/1-1 is ringing
-- Zap/1-1 answered Zap/10-1
-- Attempting native bridge of Zap/10-1 and Zap/1-1
-- Attempting native bridge of Zap/10-1 and Zap/1-1
-- Attempting native bridge of Zap/10-1 and Zap/1-1

What I don't get is why * has a need for multiple Attempting native  
bridge on multiple calls flowing through the same interface. What does  
this mean?


Best regards
l.


--
Loway Research - Home of QueueMetrics
http://queuemetrics.loway.it
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Attempting native bridge

2006-07-21 Thread Vincenzo VD. Di Donna





Hi,
I have problems with two trunks, ZAP3 and 
ZAP4. ZAP4 is connected to PSTN line while ZAP3 is connected to analogical 
switchboard. 

The 
system is able to redirect calls from ZAP4 to ZAP3, through an 
IVR, but, hanging up doesn’t work . 

This is the CLI report where you can see, at 
the end, the attempt of a native bridge instead of the call hang 
up.



 -- Playing 'custom/aa_10' 
(language 'it')
……..
 -- Executing 
Macro("Zap/4-1", "dialout-trunk|1|45|") in new 
stack
…
 -- Executing AGI("Zap/4-1", 
"recordingcheck|20060720-151752|1153401458.34") in new 
stack
 -- Launched AGI Script 
/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/recordingcheck
 
recordingcheck|20060720-151752|1153401458.34: Outbound recording not 
enabled
 -- AGI Script recordingcheck 
completed, returning 0
 -- Executing NoOp("Zap/4-1", 
"No recording needed") in new stack
 -- Executing 
Macro("Zap/4-1", "outbound-callerid|1") in new 
stack
 -- Executing 
DBget("Zap/4-1", "USEROUTCID=AMPUSER//outboundcid") in new 
stack
 -- DBget: 
varname=USEROUTCID, family=AMPUSER, 
key=/outboundcid
 -- DBget: Value not found in 
database.
 -- Executing 
GotoIf("Zap/4-1", "1?4") in new stack
 -- Goto 
(macro-outbound-callerid,s,4)
 -- Executing 
GotoIf("Zap/4-1", "1?6") in new stack
 -- Goto 
(macro-outbound-callerid,s,6)
 -- Executing NoOp("Zap/4-1", 
"CallerID set to ") in new stack
 -- Executing 
SetGroup("Zap/4-1", "OUT_1") in new stack
 -- Executing 
GotoIf("Zap/4-1", "0?108") in new stack
 -- Executing 
SetVar("Zap/4-1", "DIAL_NUMBER=45") in new 
stack
 -- Executing 
SetVar("Zap/4-1", "DIAL_TRUNK=1") in new 
stack
 -- Executing AGI("Zap/4-1", 
"fixlocalprefix") in new stack
 -- Launched AGI Script 
/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/fixlocalprefix
 -- AGI Script fixlocalprefix 
completed, returning 0
 -- Executing 
SetVar("Zap/4-1", "OUTNUM=45") in new stack
 -- Executing Cut("Zap/4-1", 
"custom=OUT_1|:|1") in new stack
 -- Executing 
GotoIf("Zap/4-1", "0?16") in new stack
 -- Executing Dial("Zap/4-1", 
"ZAP/3/45") in new stack
 -- Called 
3/45
 -- Zap/3-1 answered 
Zap/4-1
 -- Attempting native bridge 
of Zap/4-1 and Zap/3-1

Thanks in 
advance.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-13 Thread Robert Goodyear
On Apr 12, 2005, at 9:38 PM, snacktime wrote:
That would be great if I didn't want * to get out of the media path,
but I do.  In my case everything works great with the teliax 800 DID,
but not with the local number DID.  I think it's an issue on their end
myself.
___
I didn't want to insinuate that Teliax was in any way sloppy, but they 
*are* the ITSP I was referring to when I mentioned earlier in this 
thread that my provider was having issues with native bridging.

I raised a ticket with them and they're working on resolving the bug 
currently, so I think you're in the same boat with me here Mr. Snackie.

When I get closure on the ticket I'll send you a note and mention it in 
this thread for future searchers.

/rg
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-13 Thread snacktime
 
 I didn't want to insinuate that Teliax was in any way sloppy, but they
 *are* the ITSP I was referring to when I mentioned earlier in this
 thread that my provider was having issues with native bridging.
 
 I raised a ticket with them and they're working on resolving the bug
 currently, so I think you're in the same boat with me here Mr. Snackie.
 
 When I get closure on the ticket I'll send you a note and mention it in
 this thread for future searchers.

I emailed them also and got a quick reply.  Evidently they were aware
of the bridging issue, but were not aware that bridging does work on
their toll free DID's while it doesn't on the local number DID's.

Hope they get it sorted, as I do like their service and overall
quality compared to most other low cost pay as you go providers.

Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Xu Wang
Hello
We find an issue when IAX wants to transfer the native bridge. We are using
asterisk 1.0.7.

Asterisk shows following messages after getting 'answered'.
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 and
IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3
-- Channel 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2' ready to transfer
-- Channel 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3' ready to transfer
-- Releasing IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxx/3 and IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2

It turns out that both channels hangs up, but the call still continues.

However if
 Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 and
IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3 never returns, Asterisk doesn't transfer, then
everything works fine.

Can someone shed lights on this?

thank you!
steven

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Robert Goodyear
On Apr 12, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hello
We find an issue when IAX wants to transfer the native bridge. We are 
using
asterisk 1.0.7.

Asterisk shows following messages after getting 'answered'.
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 and
IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3
-- Channel 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2' ready to transfer
-- Channel 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3' ready to transfer
-- Releasing IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxx/3 and IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2
It turns out that both channels hangs up, but the call still continues.
However if
 Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 and
IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3 never returns, Asterisk doesn't transfer, 
then
everything works fine.

See: 
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-March/097007.html

...and tell me if this is what you're experiencing. In my case it was a 
ITSP issue; a bug which is being resolved. You also should ensure 
you're ANSWERing your channel. I see you mentioned it above but I don't 
know if you really mean you issued the answer command.

/rg
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Xu Wang
i do have 'answer' to 1st incoming IAX before calling the 2nd IAX. Yes, the
log looks almost the same. I have 1800 coming from one vendor, then call
through 2nd vendor (it might be the same vendor as the 1st ) to the
destination.

If 'attempting native brige' is successful, both IAXs are hung up. But the
call can still continue.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert
Goodyear
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 1:20 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of



On Apr 12, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Xu Wang wrote:

 Hello
 We find an issue when IAX wants to transfer the native bridge. We are
 using
 asterisk 1.0.7.

 Asterisk shows following messages after getting 'answered'.
 -- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 and
 IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3
 -- Channel 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2' ready to transfer
 -- Channel 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3' ready to transfer
 -- Releasing IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxx/3 and IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2

 It turns out that both channels hangs up, but the call still continues.

 However if
  Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2 and
 IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:/3 never returns, Asterisk doesn't transfer,
 then
 everything works fine.


See:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-March/097007.html

...and tell me if this is what you're experiencing. In my case it was a
ITSP issue; a bug which is being resolved. You also should ensure
you're ANSWERing your channel. I see you mentioned it above but I don't
know if you really mean you issued the answer command.

/rg

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Robert Goodyear
On Apr 12, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
i do have 'answer' to 1st incoming IAX before calling the 2nd IAX. 
Yes, the
log looks almost the same. I have 1800 coming from one vendor, then 
call
through 2nd vendor (it might be the same vendor as the 1st ) to the
destination.

If 'attempting native brige' is successful, both IAXs are hung up. But 
the
call can still continue.

Wait a moment... you mean the call is not dropped, but Asterisk is 
simply taken out of the media path? If so, I understand this to be the 
intended behavior unless you invoke the NOTRANSFER=YES directive in 
your IAX.conf for either channel. This I think is analogous to the 
CANREINVITE parameter for SIP.

I hope someone else will correct me if my understanding is wrong.
/rg
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Xu Wang
It is caused by 'notransfer'. The call is not dropped. 

thanks!
steven

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert
Goodyear
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:00 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of



On Apr 12, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Xu Wang wrote:

 i do have 'answer' to 1st incoming IAX before calling the 2nd IAX. 
 Yes, the
 log looks almost the same. I have 1800 coming from one vendor, then 
 call
 through 2nd vendor (it might be the same vendor as the 1st ) to the
 destination.

 If 'attempting native brige' is successful, both IAXs are hung up. But 
 the
 call can still continue.


Wait a moment... you mean the call is not dropped, but Asterisk is 
simply taken out of the media path? If so, I understand this to be the 
intended behavior unless you invoke the NOTRANSFER=YES directive in 
your IAX.conf for either channel. This I think is analogous to the 
CANREINVITE parameter for SIP.

I hope someone else will correct me if my understanding is wrong.

/rg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Mike Price
I also have a native bridge problem. I have 2 analogue phones each
connected to an IAXy. When attempting a call between them I get the
following:

-- Accepting DIAL from nnn.nnn.117.75, formats = 0x4
-- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6, IAX2/kitchen) in
new stack
-- Called kitchen
-- Call accepted by 192.168.6.142 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/kitchen/8 is ringing
-- IAX2/kitchen/8 answered IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6 and
IAX2/kitchen/8
Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5353 socket_read: Ooh, voice
format changed to 4
Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: chan_sip.c:771 __sip_autodestruct: Auto
destroying call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: db.c:163 ast_db_get: Unable to find key
'si-000fd3000a7e' in family 'iax/provisioning/cache'
Apr 12 17:12:18 DEBUG[2053]: iax2-provision.c:231 iax_provision_version:
Unable to create provisioning packet for 'si-000fd3000a7e'
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5353 socket_read: Ooh, voice
format changed to 4
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5835 socket_read: Immediately
destroying 8, having received INVAL
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: channel.c:2630 ast_channel_bridge:
Returning from native bridge, channels: IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6,
IAX2/kitchen/8
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:2407 iax2_hangup: We're hanging
up IAX2/kitchen/8 now...
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:2416 iax2_hangup: Really
destroying IAX2/kitchen/8 now...
-- Hungup 'IAX2/kitchen/8'
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: app_dial.c:1036 dial_exec: Exiting with
DIALSTATUS=ANSWER.
  == Spawn extension (local, 1133, 1) exited non-zero on
'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6'
-- Executing Hangup(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6, ) in new stack
  == Spawn extension (local, h, 1) exited non-zero on
'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6'
Apr 12 17:12:19 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:2407 iax2_hangup: We're hanging
up IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6 now...
-- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6'
Apr 12 17:12:27 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:5535 socket_read: Immediately
destroying 12, having received hangup
Apr 12 17:12:27 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:3792 raw_hangup: Raw Hangup
nnn.nnn.117.75:4569, src=11, dst=520
Apr 12 17:12:27 DEBUG[2053]: chan_iax2.c:3792 raw_hangup: Raw Hangup
nnn.nnn.117.75:4569, src=12, dst=7260


Any ideas?

Cheers

Mike



On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 10:00, Robert Goodyear wrote:
 On Apr 12, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
 
  i do have 'answer' to 1st incoming IAX before calling the 2nd IAX. 
  Yes, the
  log looks almost the same. I have 1800 coming from one vendor, then 
  call
  through 2nd vendor (it might be the same vendor as the 1st ) to the
  destination.
 
  If 'attempting native brige' is successful, both IAXs are hung up. But 
  the
  call can still continue.
 
 
 Wait a moment... you mean the call is not dropped, but Asterisk is 
 simply taken out of the media path? If so, I understand this to be the 
 intended behavior unless you invoke the NOTRANSFER=YES directive in 
 your IAX.conf for either channel. This I think is analogous to the 
 CANREINVITE parameter for SIP.
 
 I hope someone else will correct me if my understanding is wrong.
 
 /rg
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Robert Goodyear
On Apr 12, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Mike Price wrote:
I also have a native bridge problem. I have 2 analogue phones each
connected to an IAXy. When attempting a call between them I get the
following:
-- Accepting DIAL from nnn.nnn.117.75, formats = 0x4
-- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6, IAX2/kitchen) in
new stack
-- Called kitchen
-- Call accepted by 192.168.6.142 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/kitchen/8 is ringing
-- IAX2/kitchen/8 answered IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6 and
IAX2/kitchen/8
snipped
Didja try NOTRANSFER=YES ?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread snacktime
I have a very strange bridging problem also with teliax.  I have an
800 DID and a local number DID with them.  Both numbers go to the same
context, where the caller is dropped into DISA, and the outgoing call
also goes out through teliax.

When dialing into the 800 number, everything works.  When dialing into
the local DID, the caller enters the number he wants to call, asterisk
goes through bridging the call, but when asterisk releases the
channels and hangs up the caller hears a second of garbled voice, then
a strange sound like an electic motor dying, and the call is dropped.

extensions.conf:
[outgoing]
exten = 
_1XX,1,DIAL(IAX2/snacktime:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN},20,tr)

; I used '_.' just to make sure dialplan for both DID's was in fact the same.

[from-teliax]
exten = _.,1,Ringing
exten = _.,2,Wait(4)
exten = _.,3,Answer
exten = _.,4,Wait(2)
exten = _.,5,Authenticate(1234)
exten = _.,6,Playback(pls-entr-num-uwish2-call)
exten = _.,7,DISA(no-password|outgoing)

iax.conf:

[general]
; Teliax
register = snacktime:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[teliax]
context=from-teliax
type=friend
host=voip.teliax.com
auth=md5
secret=xx
disallow=all
allow=ulaw


Following is a log off the * console.  The log looks the same whether
it's the 800 number or local DID.

 Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 208.139.204.228, requested format =
4, actual format = 4
-- Executing Ringing(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, 4) in new stack
-- Executing Answer(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, 2) in new stack
-- Executing Authenticate(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, 1234) in new stack
-- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en')
-- Executing Playback(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5,
pls-entr-num-uwish2-call) in new stack
-- Playing 'pls-entr-num-uwish2-call' (language 'en')
-- Executing DISA(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, no-password|outgoing)
in new stack
Apr 12 20:52:13 WARNING[971]: cdr.c:286 ast_cdr_init: CDR already
initialized on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5'
-- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5,
IAX2/user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/12063821515|20|tr) in new stack
-- Called user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/12063821515
-- Call accepted by 208.139.204.228 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/teliax/3 is ringing
-- IAX2/teliax/3 answered IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5 and IAX2/teliax/3
-- Channel 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5' ready to transfer
-- Channel 'IAX2/teliax/3' ready to transfer
-- Releasing IAX2/teliax/3 and IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5
-- Hungup 'IAX2/teliax/3'
  == Spawn extension (outgoing, 12063821515, 1) exited non-zero on
'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5'
-- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5'
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread Xu Wang
add following line in the context of IAX.conf

NOTRANSFER=YES


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of snacktime
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:18 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of


I have a very strange bridging problem also with teliax.  I have an
800 DID and a local number DID with them.  Both numbers go to the same
context, where the caller is dropped into DISA, and the outgoing call
also goes out through teliax.

When dialing into the 800 number, everything works.  When dialing into
the local DID, the caller enters the number he wants to call, asterisk
goes through bridging the call, but when asterisk releases the
channels and hangs up the caller hears a second of garbled voice, then
a strange sound like an electic motor dying, and the call is dropped.

extensions.conf:
[outgoing]
exten =
_1XX,1,DIAL(IAX2/snacktime:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN},20,tr)

; I used '_.' just to make sure dialplan for both DID's was in fact the
same.

[from-teliax]
exten = _.,1,Ringing
exten = _.,2,Wait(4)
exten = _.,3,Answer
exten = _.,4,Wait(2)
exten = _.,5,Authenticate(1234)
exten = _.,6,Playback(pls-entr-num-uwish2-call)
exten = _.,7,DISA(no-password|outgoing)

iax.conf:

[general]
; Teliax
register = snacktime:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[teliax]
context=from-teliax
type=friend
host=voip.teliax.com
auth=md5
secret=xx
disallow=all
allow=ulaw


Following is a log off the * console.  The log looks the same whether
it's the 800 number or local DID.

 Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 208.139.204.228, requested format =
4, actual format = 4
-- Executing Ringing(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, 4) in new stack
-- Executing Answer(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, ) in new stack
-- Executing Wait(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, 2) in new stack
-- Executing Authenticate(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, 1234) in new stack
-- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en')
-- Executing Playback(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5,
pls-entr-num-uwish2-call) in new stack
-- Playing 'pls-entr-num-uwish2-call' (language 'en')
-- Executing DISA(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5, no-password|outgoing)
in new stack
Apr 12 20:52:13 WARNING[971]: cdr.c:286 ast_cdr_init: CDR already
initialized on 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5'
-- Executing Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5,
IAX2/user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/12063821515|20|tr) in new stack
-- Called user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/12063821515
-- Call accepted by 208.139.204.228 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/teliax/3 is ringing
-- IAX2/teliax/3 answered IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5 and IAX2/teliax/3
-- Channel 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5' ready to transfer
-- Channel 'IAX2/teliax/3' ready to transfer
-- Releasing IAX2/teliax/3 and IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5
-- Hungup 'IAX2/teliax/3'
  == Spawn extension (outgoing, 12063821515, 1) exited non-zero on
'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5'
-- Hungup 'IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5'
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge of

2005-04-12 Thread snacktime
On 4/12/05, Xu Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 add following line in the context of IAX.conf
 
 NOTRANSFER=YES


That would be great if I didn't want * to get out of the media path,
but I do.  In my case everything works great with the teliax 800 DID,
but not with the local number DID.  I think it's an issue on their end
myself.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge

2005-01-17 Thread Dave Van Abel
ERROR CONDITION
---
-- Executing Dial(SIP/2001-f6c4, SIP/2000|20) in new stack
-- Called 2000
-- SIP/2000-0ead is ringing
-- SIP/2000-0ead answered SIP/2001-f6c4
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/2001-f6c4 and SIP/2000-0ead

Have searched web and archive w/o good results.

Thks in advance for any help,

Dave

sip.conf

[general]
port = 5060 
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 
allow=all
context = bogon-calls 
externip = nn.nnn.nnn.nnn   : Behind router, but External static IP
nat=yes

[2000]
type=friend
username=2000
secret=2000
host=dynamic
context=from-sip 
mailbox=2000

[2001]
type=friend
username=2001
secret=2001
host=dynamic
context=from-sip 
mailbox=2001

;Also had some of these included, but don't understand

;nat=yes; have in [general] as seems to be req'd
;reinvite=no 
;canreinvite=no 
;qualify=1000 
;disallow=all 
;allow=gsm 
;allow=ulaw 
;allow=alaw 

extensions.conf
---
[general]

static=yes 
writeprotect=yes

[bogon-calls]

exten = _.,1,Congestion 

[from-sip]
;
; Number 2000 - Dave Laptop #1
;
exten = 2000,1,Dial(SIP/2000,20)
exten = 2000,2,Voicemail(u2000)
exten = 2000,102,Voicemail(b2000)
exten = 2000,103,Hangup
;
; Number 2001 - Dave Laptop #2
;
exten = 2001,1,Dial(SIP/2001,20)
exten = 2001,2,Voicemail(u2001)
exten = 2001,102,Voicemail(b2001)
exten = 2001,103,Hangup


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] attempting native bridge error

2004-11-12 Thread Ashling O'Driscoll
Hi,

Hope somebody has an idea as to what the following means:

I am making a call from one xlite client (2000) to another xlite
client (2001) via asterisk. The call seems to connect fine and each
client comes up as 'connected'. They both have the same codecs
enabled and have turned the silence settings to yes. However I can
hear any audio. My microphone and speakers are working fine and when
i did an ethereal sniff I can see the rtp packets being transmitted.

On the asterisk console I am seeing a message attempting native
bridge between 2000 and 2001.

Has anybody any idea what this could be?? Previous threads have
suggested that it is the codecs but toh client support gsm and I have
allowed for all the codecs in my sip.conf config file.

Thanks,
Aisling




---Legal  Disclaimer---

The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for 
the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal 
and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please 
contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of 
reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not 
guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not 
liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and 
complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay 
in its receipt.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Attempting native bridge .......

2004-10-16 Thread Chad Scott
The audio is carried on two RTP streams: one for each direction.  Is it 
possible those streams are being blocked by a firewall or something of 
the sort?

The attempting native bridge message means that Asterisk is bridging 
the two calls together without doing any codec translation... uLaw to 
uLaw, for instance.

If the two phones were using reinvite you wouldn't see this message 
because there would be nothing for Asterisk to bridge: the two phones 
are chatting to one another.

On Oct 15, 2004, at 3:34 PM, Brian Weaver wrote:
I have two fo the Sipura-2000 boxes, one at a friends house, one
here. It used to be working but now we are not getting any audio when
the call is picked up.
I'm seeing this message when he answer the phone.
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/2204-2b1b and SIP/2203-783a
As far as I can tell, it shouldn't be doing this because I have
canreinvite=no
in the sip.conf for these extensions since we are behind NAT firewalls
and the two Sipura boxes cannot talk directly to each other.
What am I missing?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users