Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-19 Thread Matt Riddell (NZ)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Lacy Moore - Aspendora wrote:
 Can Digium legally sell this?  It is my understanding that if the
 license of
 all parts cannot be legally sold, then there is no way it is going to be
 included.

Well yes, if the licence is BSD like and all code is disclaimed to Digium.

What's the bugtrack number for it?

- --
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEvu4XS6d5vy0jeVcRAvLFAJ9EfVRt1AvnyI4sKPG++W08vqe9/wCdGTdh
ERqedg6Wwgg061apvsiqf00=
=uGFk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-18 Thread Matt Riddell (NZ)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
 On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 19:21 +1200, Matt Riddell (NZ) wrote:
 It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside
 /var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you
 are compiling.  If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely
 need to remove them.
 
 or modules from others that arent allowed to contribute to
 asterisk-addons or the tree itself for whatever reason, of which I have
 a few of those that have been specifically rejected for inclusion even
 though disclaimers are on file :/
 
 politics at its finest.  At least they work and it appears that some of
 them take less ram and cpu than default asterisk stuffs :)

:)

Which applications exist that have been disclaimed, well coded, are
patent unencumbered and are not accepted?

- --
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEu9C8S6d5vy0jeVcRAuW9AJ0Z7+RC4+4sN6Sij0PySd9k2n0EmACeKAZx
L5uAsnu61xqG0/tRXEDhuhE=
=UMqE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-18 Thread trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 06:02 +1200, Matt Riddell (NZ) wrote:
 :)
 
 Which applications exist that have been disclaimed, well coded, are
 patent unencumbered and are not accepted?

res_js for example, which in my experience on a more or less fair
comparison (the javascript dialplan has more error control, better error
checking, and slightly more functionality but other than that it does
the same stuff) uses LESS ram and LESS cpu on the same hardware with the
same asterisk version when compared to extensions.conf dialplan
processing.  

That is just one example of something that could easily be placed in
asterisk-addons, was disclaimed, and wasnt wanted.  It has no patent and
the license for the code it uses is mozilla spidermonkey which depends
on the nspr stuff, both of which are tri-licensed - gpl,lgpl and mpl
(more like BSD).  

There are more examples, but this is one that doesnt break.  


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel
Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402
Utrecht NL +31 306 553058  US WA +1 360 207 0479
US NY +1 516 687 5200  FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-18 Thread Lacy Moore - Aspendora
Can Digium legally sell this? It is my understanding that if the license of all parts cannot be legally sold, then there is no way it is going to be included. 
On 7/18/06, trixter aka Bret McDanel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
res_js for example, which in my experience on a more or less faircomparison (the _javascript_ dialplan has more error control, better error
checking, and slightly more functionality but other than that it doesthe same stuff) uses LESS ram and LESS cpu on the same hardware with thesame asterisk version when compared to extensions.conf dialplanprocessing.
That is just one example of something that could easily be placed inasterisk-addons, was disclaimed, and wasnt wanted.It has no patent andthe license for the code it uses is mozilla spidermonkey which depends
on the nspr stuff, both of which are tri-licensed - gpl,lgpl and mpl(more like BSD).There are more examples, but this is one that doesnt break.--Trixter 
http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanelBelfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402Utrecht NL +31 306 553058US WA +1 360 207 0479US NY +1 516 687 5200FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBEvMZA+1olxlzQw5cRAl3yAKCs0dBbVtlNk4eOlsQl2lyclURRawCgsMxY
JuQAKQ1BBi3k+D5upBQZi0Y==GoUd-END PGP SIGNATURE-___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- Lacy MooreAspendora, Inc. 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-17 Thread Tomislav Parčina
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
 If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.  

Hi Matt!

If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how 
will I do that (using tar.gz)?


--
Tomislav Parčina
Lama Computers Split
Stinice 12, 21000 Split
Tel.: +385(21)495148
Mob.: +385(91)1212148
SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e-mail: tparcina#lama.hr
http://www.lama.hr
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-17 Thread Martin Joseph

On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Parčina wrote:

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.  

Hi Matt!

If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)?


I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory,  you can always cd back to it and do a make clean, make,  make install.

This is only what I have gleaned from the list,  so hopefully more knowledgeable list members will chime in.

This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be...


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-17 Thread trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 23:57 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote:
 I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory,  you can
 always cd back to it and do a make clean, make, make install.
 
or if you are lazy, make takes multiple targets so you could do:
make clean all install
all on one like that way and if one target fails the others shouldnt
proceed :)  'install' should have a dependancy on 'all' so if you just
do make clean install it should work the same.

It will use the newer zaptel if you dont do that as well, so if zaptel
is the issue that causes you to want to go back then you will have to do
a make clean all install there as well.


 This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like
 the idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need
 be...

you can have different SVN repositories on your local system as well,
and still do that, or use a release tag to get a specific version,
either way.


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel
Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402
Utrecht NL +31 306 553058  US WA +1 360 207 0479
US NY +1 516 687 5200  FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-17 Thread Matt Riddell (NZ)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Joseph wrote:
 
 On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Parčina wrote:
 
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
 If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.

 Hi Matt!

 If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior
 version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)?


 I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory,  you can
 always cd back to it and do a make clean, make,  make install.
 
 This is only what I have gleaned from the list,  so hopefully more
 knowledgeable list members will chime in.
 
 This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the
 idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be...

Also don't forget to pay close attention to the messages at the end of
the make process when compiling and installing Asterisk.

It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside
/var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you
are compiling.  If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely
need to remove them.

- --
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEuzqBS6d5vy0jeVcRAqspAJ0enhDY0coXa2TjQOym25413CMotQCfb6+r
e+s/AhF5yPREzBQmm6SnlOs=
=sZVl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-17 Thread trixter aka Bret McDanel
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 19:21 +1200, Matt Riddell (NZ) wrote:
 It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside
 /var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you
 are compiling.  If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely
 need to remove them.

or modules from others that arent allowed to contribute to
asterisk-addons or the tree itself for whatever reason, of which I have
a few of those that have been specifically rejected for inclusion even
though disclaimers are on file :/

politics at its finest.  At least they work and it appears that some of
them take less ram and cpu than default asterisk stuffs :)


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel
Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461DE +49 801 777 555 3402
Utrecht NL +31 306 553058  US WA +1 360 207 0479
US NY +1 516 687 5200  FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

2006-07-17 Thread jwb
You can use svn export to grab a copy of the source and then archive that 
directory.  Roughly the same difference.

-jwb

Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless  

-Original Message-
From: Matt Riddell (NZ) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:21:37 
To:Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial 
Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk 1.2.10 and Zaptel 1.2.7 released!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Joseph wrote:
 
 On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Tomislav Parčina wrote:
 
 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
 If it was a .tar.gz download then you will need to reinstall.

 Hi Matt!

 If I upgrade to 1.2.10 and than decide to go back to some prior
 version, how will I do that (using tar.gz)?


 I think if you keep the older source in a separate directory,  you can
 always cd back to it and do a make clean, make,  make install.
 
 This is only what I have gleaned from the list,  so hopefully more
 knowledgeable list members will chime in.
 
 This is also the reason I have avoided building from SVN, as I like the
 idea of being able to revert to an earlier working build if need be...

Also don't forget to pay close attention to the messages at the end of
the make process when compiling and installing Asterisk.

It will sometimes tell you that there are modules inside
/var/lib/asterisk/modules which were not compiled for the version you
are compiling.  If these are not asterisk-addons modules you will likely
need to remove them.

- --
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://freevoip.gedameurope.com (Free Asterisk Voip Community)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEuzqBS6d5vy0jeVcRAqspAJ0enhDY0coXa2TjQOym25413CMotQCfb6+r
e+s/AhF5yPREzBQmm6SnlOs=
=sZVl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users