Re: [asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-10 Thread Martin Joseph


On Jul 9, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Vincent Delporte wrote:
snip
Thanks for the info. This little experiment is getting expensive ;-)

LOL!  I know that feeling... I actually thought I would save money with 
VOIP, what a joke!  Actually I am happy with my setup,  but spent an 
intial $75(us) thinking the HT-488 would provide an FXO for my PSTN 
connection, only to find it doesn't work well enough to actually use 
for that.


I then spent an additional $200(us) for the Wellgate 3701a (1FXS+1FXO) 
which, although horribly documented is a HUGE improvement over the 
Grandstream garbage (HT-488).


So yeah,  it gets expensive quickly.  It's annoying that so many of the 
products are marginal or straight up garbage,  but I guess we are still 
in the infancy of the standards based VOIP business, and many of the 
products are in search of a firmware update, or a decent manual.


Oh well, More work for the stubborn techo-maniacs who refuse to give 
up(like me).


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-10 Thread Rich Adamson

Martin Joseph wrote:


On Jul 9, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Vincent Delporte wrote:
snip
Thanks for the info. This little experiment is getting expensive ;-)

LOL!  I know that feeling... I actually thought I would save money with 
VOIP, what a joke!  Actually I am happy with my setup,  but spent an 
intial $75(us) thinking the HT-488 would provide an FXO for my PSTN 
connection, only to find it doesn't work well enough to actually use for 
that.


I then spent an additional $200(us) for the Wellgate 3701a (1FXS+1FXO) 
which, although horribly documented is a HUGE improvement over the 
Grandstream garbage (HT-488).


So yeah,  it gets expensive quickly.  It's annoying that so many of the 
products are marginal or straight up garbage,  but I guess we are still 
in the infancy of the standards based VOIP business, and many of the 
products are in search of a firmware update, or a decent manual.


Oh well, More work for the stubborn techo-maniacs who refuse to give 
up(like me).


I've gone through the same basic devices over the last three years, but 
have also tested the Mediatrix 1204 box as well.


I've got four analog pstn lines here coming from two different central 
offices, both of which are on relatively long loops with somewhat 
unusual echo characteristics. I have also gone through the spa3000, 
ht488, x100p's, multiple h/w versions of the TDM04b, etc. Also have a 
TDM2400 here for testing, but testing has been held up due to delays in 
being able to run current trunk code on the test machine.


To date, the best devices from a quality of audio perspective are the 
Mediatrix 1204 and the Sangoma A200D. The last time I worked with the 
1204 was about two years ago and the box had several compatibility and 
security issues that hopefully have been resolved since then. Its retail 
price is higher then the A200D (in the US). The A200D has been in use 
now for several months and has provided excellent audio (etc), supports 
modem use (fax and POS), and just hasn't failed in any way.


Rumor has it that Digium will be announcing some new cards in the near 
future that should also help address the space for small numbers of 
analog pstn lines. Unknown as to what the current status happens to be.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-10 Thread Martin Joseph


On Jul 9, 2006, at 11:44 PM, Rich Adamson wrote:


Martin Joseph wrote:

On Jul 9, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Vincent Delporte wrote:
snip
Thanks for the info. This little experiment is getting expensive ;-)
snip


Rumor has it that Digium will be announcing some new cards in the near 
future that should also help address the space for small numbers of 
analog pstn lines. Unknown as to what the current status happens to 
be.


PCI card aren't an option for me, as I am using OSX as my Asterisk 
platform,  so that doesn't work.  I am still keeping my eyes open for 
additional devices that might work as an FXO or 2, and have the desired 
characteristics.  The Echo can in the Wellgate 3701a is clearly much 
better then the Grandstream one,  but it still takes some number of 
seconds to train at the beginning of calls, which is kind of funky.


Thanks for the info Rich.
Marty

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-09 Thread The Masked Cucumber

At 12:00 09/07/2006 -0700, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Are some of the Ebay ad's misrepresented? Probably.


Thanks a lot for the info on the history of the FXO cards. Obviously, the 
ones I bought aren't the good ones :-)


You're likely to become just about as frustrated with the fxo-sip gateway 
boxes on the market.


Mmm... So, what would you recommend? Getting an exensive FXO/SIP box, or a 
Digium card? The one with a single FXO port sells for about 150E over here.


Cheers
Vincent.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/383 - Release Date: 07/07/2006


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-09 Thread Michael Graves



Skip local FXOs altogether. Setup an account with somone who provides DIDs via IP. Call forward your analog line to the IP based number. It will be absolutely painless compared to the troubles of small FXO interfaces.



Michael



On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:09:40 +0200, The Masked Cucumber wrote:



At 12:00 09/07/2006 -0700, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Are some of the Ebay ad's misrepresented? Probably.



Thanks a lot for the info on the history of the FXO cards. Obviously, the 

ones I bought aren't the good ones :-)



You're likely to become just about as frustrated with the fxo-sip gateway 

boxes on the market.



Mmm... So, what would you recommend? Getting an exensive FXO/SIP box, or a 

Digium card? The one with a single FXO port sells for about 150E over here.



Cheers

Vincent.





-- 

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.

Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/383 - Release Date: 07/07/2006





___

--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --



asterisk-users mailing list

To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users








___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-09 Thread Rich Adamson

The Masked Cucumber wrote:

At 12:00 09/07/2006 -0700, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Are some of the Ebay ad's misrepresented? Probably.


Thanks a lot for the info on the history of the FXO cards. Obviously, 
the ones I bought aren't the good ones :-)


You're likely to become just about as frustrated with the fxo-sip 
gateway boxes on the market.


Mmm... So, what would you recommend? Getting an exensive FXO/SIP box, or 
a Digium card? The one with a single FXO port sells for about 150E over 
here.


As mentioned previously, recommending a specific device basically 
assumes one understands exactly what type of pstn connection you've got, 
how far you are from the central office, etc. Some folks have had good 
luck with the spa3000 (and some not). The TDM400 card from digium works 
pretty good, but can be less then acceptable in some cases. The Sangoma 
A200D (with hardware EC) works very well on all pstn lines that I've 
tested, but is rather expensive.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: What's the story with X10*P FXO cards?

2006-07-09 Thread Vincent Delporte

At 22:36 09/07/2006 -0700, Michael Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Skip local FXOs altogether. Setup an account with somone who provides DIDs 
via IP. Call forward your analog line to the IP based number. It will be 
absolutely painless compared to the

troubles of small FXO interfaces.


I'll look into this, although
1. I'm not sure VoIP providers do this here yet
2. While the POTS is very reliable, I can't say the same for ADSL. I'm a 
bit scared to depend on the Net for incoming calls.


At 22:36 09/07/2006 -0700, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some folks have had good luck with the spa3000 (and some not). The TDM400 
card from digium works pretty good, but can be less then acceptable in 
some cases. The Sangoma A200D (with hardware EC) works very well on all 
pstn lines that I've tested, but is rather expensive.


Thanks for the info. This little experiment is getting expensive ;-)

VD.


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/383 - Release Date: 07/07/2006


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users