[asterisk-users] tdm400 problem
Hi all I have a problem with an tdm400 with 2 modules 1 fxo 1 fxs it just doesnt load the fxs module i dunno why... zaptel.conf loadzone=es defaultzone=es # qozap span definitions # most of the values should be bogus because we are not really zaptel span=1,1,3,ccs,ami span=2,0,3,ccs,ami span=3,0,3,ccs,ami span=4,0,3,ccs,ami bchan=1,2 dchan=3 bchan=4,5 dchan=6 bchan=7,8 dchan=9 bchan=10,11 dchan=12 fxsks=13 fxoks=14 zapata.conf [channels] language=es echocancel=yes context=from-pstn echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes echotraining=500 rxgain=-4.0 txgain=-6.0 usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no threewaycalling=yes ;; RDSI BRI switchtype = euroisdn signalling = bri_cpe group=0 channel = 1-2,4-5,7-8 #channel = 1-2,7-8 ;; FXO signalling=fxs_ks group=1 rxgain=1.0 txgain=-6.0 busydetect=yes channel = 13 ;; FXS signalling=fxo_ks group=2 context=from-internal channel = 14 -- dmesg Freshmaker version: 73 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) !!! LOOP_CLOSE_TRES iREG 1C = 1 should be 1000 !!! RING_TRIP_TRES iREG 1D = 8000 should be 3600 !!! COMMON_MIN_TRES iREG 1E = 0 should be 1000 !!! COMMON_MAX_TRES iREG 1F = 0 should be 200 !!! PWR_ALARM_Q1Q2 iREG 20 = 1480 should be 7C0 !!! PWR_ALARM_Q3Q4 iREG 21 = 37C0 should be 2600 !!! PWR_ALARM_Q5Q6 iREG 22 = 3D70 should be 1B80 !!! LOOP_CLOSURE_FILTER iREG 23 = 3970 should be 8000 !!! RING_TRIP_FILTER iREG 24 = 78E0 should be 320 !!! TERM_LP_POLE_Q1Q2 iREG 25 = 8B60 should be 8C !!! TERM_LP_POLE_Q3Q4 iREG 26 = 6A40 should be 100 !!! TERM_LP_POLE_Q5Q6 iREG 27 = 8070 should be 10 !!! CM_BIAS_RINGING iREG 28 = should be C00 !!! DCDC_MIN_V iREG 29 = should be C00 !!! DCDC_XTRA iREG 2A = should be 1000 !!! LOOP_CLOSE_TRES_LOW iREG 2B = should be 1000 ! Init Indirect Registers UNSUCCESSFULLY. Indirect Registers failed verification. Proslic Failed on Second Attempt to Calibrate Manually. (Try -DNO_CALIBRATION in Makefile) Module 1: FAILED FXS (FCC) Module 2: Not installed Module 3: Not installed Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (1 modules) Registered tone zone 6 (Spain) -- [Jorge J. Boscán Etura] quando omni flunkus moritatus Linux 2.6.17 X86_64 running fc6, lu #137000 +34636029900 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 Problem
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:16:05PM -0600, Eric Rees wrote: Has anyone seen this message trying to install an TDM400.. spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 Not sure what to has to do with your system, but I read somewhere that it is related to how the original interrupt controllers worked. If a card signalled an interrupt but then withdrew it before the host processor got around to reading the interrupt register, it would register as IRQ7. The kernel here is just pointing out that it got an IRQ7 but wasn't expecting it and it has now disabled it. If a module wants it it needs to register it. It's a harmless message... I'm fairly sure that IO-APIC only systems don't have this problem. -- Martijn van Oosterhout ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 Problem
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:16:05 -0600, Eric Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone seen this message trying to install an TDM400.. spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 This error happens after I do a modprobe wctdm and then the system hangs. I am installing this in an Asus motherboard with a VIA P4M266 chipset. I used to get this message a lot on my computer (before I even heard of Asterisk, mind you). When I looked into it and asked people questions, I was told that it is a harmless message. I don't know if this is the case with Digium hardware though... It could cause some issues. Is the card working for you at all? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 Problem
Has anyone seen this message trying to install an TDM400.. spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 I used to get this message a lot on my computer (before I even heard of Asterisk, mind you). When I looked into it and asked people questions, I was told that it is a harmless message. I even get this on production servers (ISP level) that have nothing to do with Asterisk. Given that IRQ 7 is the parallel port, I would guess it comes up when the parallel drivers are loaded but there is nothing plugged in to the port. Completely harmless AFAIK... Andrew -- Linux supports the notion of a command line or a shell for the same reason that only children read books with only pictures in them. Language, be it English or something else, is the only tool flexible enough to accomplish a sufficiently broad range of tasks. -- Bill Garrett ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400 Problem
Has anyone seen this message trying to install an TDM400.. spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7 This error happens after I do a modprobe wctdm and then the system hangs. I am installing this in an Asus motherboard with a VIA P4M266 chipset. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400 problem
I recently swapped 2 FXO modules on to what had previously been a 4 FXS version of the TDM400 board. The FXS ports are recognized - the FXO ports don't appear to be recognized (ie modprobe wcfxo and ztcfg both say channel 1 isn't there). Has anyone experienced this problem? All software is current as of this AM. If the old FXS modules are re-installed all works just dandy (other than the fact that I need the 2 FXO ports)... Thanks! ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 problem
As you have a TDM400 you should load wcfxs module ( modprobe wcfxs or modprobe wctdm for new versions) regardless to modules you have installed on your board. You should also check the signalling specified in zaptel.conf according to your modules and the order they are placed on your TDM400. Best regards Lamine - Original Message - From: Steven P. Donegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 6:01 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 problem I recently swapped 2 FXO modules on to what had previously been a 4 FXS version of the TDM400 board. The FXS ports are recognized - the FXO ports don't appear to be recognized (ie modprobe wcfxo and ztcfg both say channel 1 isn't there). Has anyone experienced this problem? All software is current as of this AM. If the old FXS modules are re-installed all works just dandy (other than the fact that I need the 2 FXO ports)... Thanks! ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 problem
Mamadou Lamine KA wrote: As you have a TDM400 you should load wcfxs module ( modprobe wcfxs or modprobe wctdm for new versions) regardless to modules you have installed on your board. You should also check the signalling specified in zaptel.conf according to your modules and the order they are placed on your TDM400. Best regards Lamine - Original Message - From: Steven P. Donegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 6:01 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400 problem I recently swapped 2 FXO modules on to what had previously been a 4 FXS version of the TDM400 board. The FXS ports are recognized - the FXO ports don't appear to be recognized (ie modprobe wcfxo and ztcfg both say channel 1 isn't there). Has anyone experienced this problem? All software is current as of this AM. If the old FXS modules are re-installed all works just dandy (other than the fact that I need the 2 FXO ports)... Thanks! ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users modules are FXO and FXS - zapata.conf says fxoks=1-2 and fxsks=3-4 TDM is older unit with no apparent external power connectors (well, not a disk drive type one anyway) and no external power was required to use the FXS ports in the past... ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
