Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0-beta1 and Hints (Re: CVS HEAD and Hints)

2005-10-06 Thread Olle E. Johansson

> 
> According to
> http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+sip+incominglimit
> incominglimit and outgoinglimit are deprecated.
> 
> 

incominglimit is replaced by call-limit. Please read sip.conf.sample.
Outgoinglimit has not worked for ages, so we removed it. One limit works
for both incoming and outgoing calls now.

/O
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1

2005-08-29 Thread Anton Krall
I doubt my cvs was that current so... It's a clena install then... 

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
|Kevin P. Fleming
|Sent: Domingo, 28 de Agosto de 2005 09:56 p.m.
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1
|
|Anton Krall wrote:
|> I upgraded from cvs head 1.0.x which in my case was cvs head about 2 
|> months ago.
|
|There is no such thing as "cvs head 1.0.x". You could mean 'CVS v1-0" 
|(whatever was current in the 1.0.x branch at the time) or 'CVS HEAD' 
|(the current development branch at the time).
|
|> Do you recommend doing a clean install vs. installing on top?
|
|Unless you were running a recent CVS HEAD already, yes, a 
|clean install is a good idea.
|___
|--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
|
|Asterisk-Users mailing list
|Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1

2005-08-28 Thread Kevin P. Fleming

Anton Krall wrote:

I upgraded from cvs head 1.0.x which in my case was cvs head about 2 months
ago.


There is no such thing as "cvs head 1.0.x". You could mean 'CVS v1-0" 
(whatever was current in the 1.0.x branch at the time) or 'CVS HEAD' 
(the current development branch at the time).



Do you recommend doing a clean install vs. installing on top?


Unless you were running a recent CVS HEAD already, yes, a clean install 
is a good idea.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1

2005-08-28 Thread Anton Krall
I upgraded from cvs head 1.0.x which in my case was cvs head about 2 months
ago.

Do you recommend doing a clean install vs. installing on top?

What new dialplan features should I look for and new apps on 1.2.0 beta1?  

|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
|Kevin P. Fleming
|Sent: Domingo, 28 de Agosto de 2005 05:58 p.m.
|To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1
|
|Anton Krall wrote:
|
|
|> Also, maybe it was me but I upgraded on a test server by doing the 
|> make and make install over my cvs old one and when on the CLI I do a 
|> show version and I get this:
|
|CVS what? v1-0? HEAD?
|
|> 
|> server2*CLI> show version
|> Asterisk  built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i686 running 
|> Linux on
|> 2005-08-27 22:54:47 UTC
|> server2*CLI>
|
|That is a bug in the tarballs for 1.2.0-beta1, I'll fix it tonight.
|
|> Also checked the "show applications" and saw no new ones 
|there.. Did I 
|> messed up upgrading over the old one?
|
|Depends on what you upgraded from...
|___
|--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
|
|Asterisk-Users mailing list
|Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1

2005-08-28 Thread David Liu

Hi Kevin,

Just courious how to fix the bug for not a blank space in Asterisk 
version number?  I think I have seen that in the past but downloading a 
new copy from CVS fixes it.  No harm but it tickles.


David

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:


Anton Krall wrote:


Also, maybe it was me but I upgraded on a test server by doing the 
make and
make install over my cvs old one and when on the CLI I do a show 
version and

I get this:



CVS what? v1-0? HEAD?



server2*CLI> show version
Asterisk  built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i686 running 
Linux on

2005-08-27 22:54:47 UTC
server2*CLI>



That is a bug in the tarballs for 1.2.0-beta1, I'll fix it tonight.


Also checked the "show applications" and saw no new ones there.. Did I
messed up upgrading over the old one?



Depends on what you upgraded from...
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 1.2.0 Beta1

2005-08-28 Thread Kevin P. Fleming

Anton Krall wrote:



Also, maybe it was me but I upgraded on a test server by doing the make and
make install over my cvs old one and when on the CLI I do a show version and
I get this:


CVS what? v1-0? HEAD?



server2*CLI> show version
Asterisk  built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i686 running Linux on
2005-08-27 22:54:47 UTC
server2*CLI>


That is a bug in the tarballs for 1.2.0-beta1, I'll fix it tonight.


Also checked the "show applications" and saw no new ones there.. Did I
messed up upgrading over the old one?


Depends on what you upgraded from...
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users