Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Hi I know there is no support for R2, but I succcessfully compiled and ran the libr2. However, I am not able to initiate calls. The error I get is Couldn't call g3/71605538 -- Hungup 'Zap/32-1' == Everyone is busy at this time I understand that the idle signaling is not working right, any ideas on what I can do to fix this problem? Looking forward to your responses. Regards, Jorge On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 22:58, Steve Underwood wrote: jorge verastegui wrote: Hi i have successfully downloaded and compiled libr2 from source. But i dont seem to find how to properly configure it. When i run it (partcially unconfigured) the following error occurrs Signalling requested is R2 Signalling but line is in PRI Signalling signalling This error is easy to fix by changing ccs to cas, and removing crc4, in your zaptel.conf file. However libr2 does not work. It is a partly implemented solution which I abandoned. It only gets you about 10% of the way to a working R2 system :-( My current R2 software is completely different. Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Jorge Verastegui [EMAIL PROTECTED] RedCetus S.R.L. --NOTA DE REDCETUS S.R.L. : La informacin contenida en este E-mail y sus anexos, slo puede ser utilizada por el individuo o la compaa a la cual est dirigido. Si no es el receptor autorizado, cualquier retencin, difusin, distribucin o copia de este mensaje es prohibida y sancionada por la ley. Si por error recibe este mensaje, favor reenviarlo y borrar el mismo
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Hi, I make it compile. I just never finished it. :-) What I did to make R2 work properly was throw away the code that is now in CVS at Digium, and write a new implementation from scratch. I guess that is not quite the answer you wanted to hear. :-( Regards, Steve Jorge Verastegui wrote: Hi I know there is no support for R2, but I succcessfully compiled and ran the libr2. However, I am not able to initiate calls. The error I get is Couldn't call g3/71605538 -- Hungup 'Zap/32-1' == Everyone is busy at this time I understand that the idle signaling is not working right, any ideas on what I can do to fix this problem? Looking forward to your responses. Regards, Jorge On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 22:58, Steve Underwood wrote: jorge verastegui wrote: Hi i have successfully downloaded and compiled libr2 from source. But i dont seem to find how to properly configure it. When i run it (partcially unconfigured) the following error occurrs Signalling requested is R2 Signalling but line is in PRI Signalling signalling This error is easy to fix by changing ccs to cas, and removing crc4, in your zaptel.conf file. However libr2 does not work. It is a partly implemented solution which I abandoned. It only gets you about 10% of the way to a working R2 system :-( My current R2 software is completely different. Regards, Steve ] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Are there any signaling converters? From R2 to something which is supported in asterisk ? Bart - Original Message - From: Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support Hi, I make it compile. I just never finished it. :-) What I did to make R2 work properly was throw away the code that is now in CVS at Digium, and write a new implementation from scratch. I guess that is not quite the answer you wanted to hear. :-( Regards, Steve Jorge Verastegui wrote: Hi I know there is no support for R2, but I succcessfully compiled and ran the libr2. However, I am not able to initiate calls. The error I get is Couldn't call g3/71605538 -- Hungup 'Zap/32-1' == Everyone is busy at this time I understand that the idle signaling is not working right, any ideas on what I can do to fix this problem? Looking forward to your responses. Regards, Jorge On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 22:58, Steve Underwood wrote: jorge verastegui wrote: Hi i have successfully downloaded and compiled libr2 from source. But i dont seem to find how to properly configure it. When i run it (partcially unconfigured) the following error occurrs Signalling requested is R2 Signalling but line is in PRI Signalling signalling This error is easy to fix by changing ccs to cas, and removing crc4, in your zaptel.conf file. However libr2 does not work. It is a partly implemented solution which I abandoned. It only gets you about 10% of the way to a working R2 system :-( My current R2 software is completely different. Regards, Steve ] ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:27:28 -0300 CW_ASN - Gus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe Telefonica (the same from .ar) is not big enough! By the sight Telefónica in Brazil is not very serious, in Argentina offers ISDN in all country, for all kinds of teleservices... I'm sure of that. In Brasil, Telefonica offers ISDN, but it's a diferent comercial service (if you want voice and data in your E1), and it's more expensive. If you only want voice, the only choice is R2. Small carriers are more flexive and offers whatever singnaling you ask. regards Eduardo ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:49:31 -0300 CW_ASN - Gus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Brasil, Telefonica offers ISDN, but it's a diferent comercial service (if you want voice and data in your E1), and it's more expensive. If you only want voice, the only choice is R2. Very weird, in Argentina the cost is different only for international calls in nx64; for national uses, the prices are the same for voice or data. Here, the installation and all the contract are more expensive. sucks a lot. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
CW_ASN wrote: CW_ASN - Gus wrote: Ok, it's old and clunky, but in some countries like Brazil, Argentina and China is the only alternative. Only alternative??? Why is the only alternative? All mayor carriers in Argentina and Brasil have PRI signalling, at the same price. Sorry, but you are wrong. I am from Brazil and E1-ISDN is not avaible all over the country. Daniel Maybe, you don't have big carriers in all country... Maybe Telefonica (the same from .ar) is not big enough! ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Maybe Telefonica (the same from .ar) is not big enough! By the sight Telefónica in Brazil is not very serious, in Argentina offers ISDN in all country, for all kinds of teleservices... I'm sure of that. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
CW_ASN - Gus wrote: Ok, it's old and clunky, but in some countries like Brazil, Argentina and China is the only alternative. Only alternative??? Why is the only alternative? All mayor carriers in Argentina and Brasil have PRI signalling, at the same price. Sorry, but you are wrong. I am from Brazil and E1-ISDN is not avaible all over the country. Daniel ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
CW_ASN - Gus wrote: Ok, it's old and clunky, but in some countries like Brazil, Argentina and China is the only alternative. Only alternative??? Why is the only alternative? All mayor carriers in Argentina and Brasil have PRI signalling, at the same price. Sorry, but you are wrong. I am from Brazil and E1-ISDN is not avaible all over the country.Daniel Maybe, you don't have big carriers in all country...
RE: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Ok, it's old and clunky, but in some countries like Brazil, Argentina and China is the only alternative. So, the original question, does anybody know something about the Steve's project or know a release date? All the best, Pablo. -Original Message- From: Alfred R. Nurnberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:11 Posted To: Asterisk Conversation: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support Steve. You are saying this from your view of 2004. But at the time R2 was developed there were no microcontrollers and tones were decoded with LC filters. R2 provides interactive capabilities base on a simple tones protocol to retrieve ANI, dialed numbers, signalling status etc. It's compelled structure provides some kind of handshaking to deal with different kind of switches and their speed. Nowadays this is no issue at all but at the days R2 was developed you had to take into account that relays and step by step switches take their time. On the other hand I have to agree with you... Well, what is the definition of sane anyway :-) Regards. Alfred. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Underwood Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 5:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support Olle E. Johansson wrote: LQ (Asterisk) wrote: Hi guys, I was reading that Steve Underwood is working on Asterisk R2 signalling support, and has the 95% of the work done. What is R2? I'm curious. Half of R2D2, of course. Its also a stupid clunky multi-tone based telephone signaling system widely used over E1s in South America, Asia, and parts of Eastern Europe. No sane telecoms engineer would use it. However, few telecoms engineers are entirely sane :-) Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Ok, it's old and clunky, but in some countries like Brazil, Argentina and China is the only alternative. Only alternative??? Why is the only alternative? All mayor carriers in Argentina and Brasil have PRI signalling, at the same price. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
yes but PRI is not a trunk, R2 can be used as a trunk. Luciano -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de CW_ASN - Gus Enviado el: Martes 20 de Enero del 2004 13:08 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support Ok, it's old and clunky, but in some countries like Brazil, Argentina and China is the only alternative. Only alternative??? Why is the only alternative? All mayor carriers in Argentina and Brasil have PRI signalling, at the same price. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
yes but PRI is not a trunk, Not in all switches... You have a Siemens EWSD (I know your company), if you change to V15 you can treat the PRI like a route (and a lot of things more). I have Siemens EWSD and Lucent 5ESS, and for 5ESS, the PRI is a route. I see only one reason to use R2... only when you want to replace old PBX without change the signalling in CO side. R2 can be used as a trunk. So what? We don't use R2 for trunk purposes since 5 years or more, using PRI and S7. Regards, Gustavo ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 18:38, Olle E. Johansson wrote: LQ (Asterisk) wrote: Hi guys, I was reading that Steve Underwood is working on Asterisk R2 signalling support, and has the 95% of the work done. What is R2? I'm curious. A type of signaling for E1 lines. -- Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED] House Internet S.R.L. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
It's an old trunking signaling protocol, It's inband, and the worst thing about it, apart from how slow it is, because it's base on pulses, is that every country has it's own implementation of it. Luciano -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Olle E. Johansson Enviado el: Lunes 19 de Enero del 2004 18:38 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support LQ (Asterisk) wrote: Hi guys, I was reading that Steve Underwood is working on Asterisk R2 signalling support, and has the 95% of the work done. What is R2? I'm curious. /O ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Olle E. Johansson wrote: LQ (Asterisk) wrote: Hi guys, I was reading that Steve Underwood is working on Asterisk R2 signalling support, and has the 95% of the work done. What is R2? I'm curious. Half of R2D2, of course. Its also a stupid clunky multi-tone based telephone signaling system widely used over E1s in South America, Asia, and parts of Eastern Europe. No sane telecoms engineer would use it. However, few telecoms engineers are entirely sane :-) Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Steve. You are saying this from your view of 2004. But at the time R2 was developed there were no microcontrollers and tones were decoded with LC filters. R2 provides interactive capabilities base on a simple tones protocol to retrieve ANI, dialed numbers, signalling status etc. It's compelled structure provides some kind of handshaking to deal with different kind of switches and their speed. Nowadays this is no issue at all but at the days R2 was developed you had to take into account that relays and step by step switches take their time. On the other hand I have to agree with you... Well, what is the definition of sane anyway :-) Regards. Alfred. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steve Underwood Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 5:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support Olle E. Johansson wrote: LQ (Asterisk) wrote: Hi guys, I was reading that Steve Underwood is working on Asterisk R2 signalling support, and has the 95% of the work done. What is R2? I'm curious. Half of R2D2, of course. Its also a stupid clunky multi-tone based telephone signaling system widely used over E1s in South America, Asia, and parts of Eastern Europe. No sane telecoms engineer would use it. However, few telecoms engineers are entirely sane :-) Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] R2 support
Hi folks, where can I find the R2 beta code for Asterisk? Best, PauloHM Here is the last mail that I recall seeing on the subject: From: Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] E1 R2 on Asterisk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:51:45 +0800 John Todd wrote: LQ (Asterisk) wrote: Dear fellows, I need to use Asterisk with an E1 card with CAS R2 signalling for Argentina. I know that the E100P don't support it right now. Correct Does anybody developing R2 drivers? Yes. Interestingly terse reply; perhaps you can be more specific? I have an interest in the same drivers, and there was some discussion a week ago (two weeks?) on the topic, specifically about how a driver might be written, but I heard no confirmation that there was progress or any timeframes. Anyone have any encouraging updates for those of us waiting for R2? I've been more specific in the past. This was just a brief recap, since its the same question each time (OK, the country varies, but not much else). The work was held up by SARS, as the testing has been done in China. Now the SARS threat has abated, I hope we will see a polished China R2 soon. Every other country requires modifications, as no two countries implement R2 in quite the same way. However, the software has been written with all the variants in mind, and completing support for other countries should be pretty straightforward, once it is a proven platform in China. You will find some elements of R2ness in CVS. That is work I did over a year ago, then left unfinished. The DSP part of that is OK, although I have improved it recently. The rest was a lash-up, which has now been totally replaced by a solid implementation. I have a new channel driver for Asterisk, which supports R2 and PRI with the Zaptel drivers. My intention is to add other protocols, so this becomes a replacement for chan_zap. The way chan_zap works had some flexibility issues for me, so I have tried to steer everything through a generalised signalling API. On one side are plug in protocols - currently PRI and R2. On the other side is Asterisk. Hopefully, this will allow new protocols to plug in with little or no change to anything in Asterisk. This is somewhat like Dialogic's GlobalCall, but hopefully without so much of their clunkiness. :-) FAQ: Can I help with testing, and be an early adopter? No. I have all the testers I need right now. Until I have it well proven, with E1's full of calls pumping through it, I am not interesting in having other testers involved. I expect the assistance of other testers will be needed later, to deal with issues arising from the local variants of R2. Help at that time will be most appreciated. Regards, Steve ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users