Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-15 Thread C F
On 6/15/07, Nick Seraphin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote:

   Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed
   to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have
   a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU
   on it.  They're very big on standards-compliance and stuff like that.
   Sometime look into their rules and regs about colocating equipment inside
   one of their CO's...  it's very very strict.
 
  The last thing you say is why I am asking this question. The
  compliance doesn't realy bother me that much, what I am afraid is if
  the provider notices this and decides to cut it because of that.


 Whether they would actually cut you off or not probably depends on A) if
 they find out about it, and B) whoever finds out about it is a strict
 play-by-the-rules kinda guy and/or has a grudge against you or is having a
 bad day.  A lot of telco employees tend to look the other way...
 especially if it's not their job to care about it.

 But... they would have every right to terminate the service if you don't
 have proper equipment connected to their network.  So if they DID decide
 to terminate it, they would legally have the right to do so, and you would
 have no recourse other than possibly to purchase the correct equipment and
 maybe pay a reconnect fee to get service turned back on, which may take
 days/weeks/whatever time frame to do so.

 So it's basically a question of, can you afford the downtime caused by
 them shutting you off if/when they ever found out and/or cared enough to
 follow the rules.

 The other possibility, considering it is working for you now, is that
 there IS a CSU built in but they don't want to tell you... maybe for
 example because it's not FCC certified... or so that they can charge you
 for an external CSU.

It's quite possible that the what you say about FCC certified (or any
other certification on their built in CSU) is why they want you to buy
an external one. They don't make their own (they recommend Adtran
ACE). The other thing, if it would have a CSU it should have LBO
settings and it doesn't.

For the rest, I am going to get external CSUs since I can't afford the downtime.


 -- Nick



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-15 Thread Jeff Davis
C F wrote:
 No, I installed the system, it goes from smart jack to the PRI card in
 the Panasonic KX-TDA200 thru the 0290 card
 
 When I first started working with T1's, most CSU's were external.  I still
 have several of them in storage in fact... and I still use external
 CSU/DSU's on my production network today. :-)  I'm typing this message and
 it will be sent over a T1 connected to 2 external CSU's before it reaches
 the internet.

 Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed
 to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have
 a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU
 on it.  They're very big on standards-compliance and stuff like that.
 Sometime look into their rules and regs about colocating equipment inside
 one of their CO's...  it's very very strict.
 
 The last thing you say is why I am asking this question. The
 compliance doesn't realy bother me that much, what I am afraid is if
 the provider notices this and decides to cut it because of that.

Several points:

Your card does not contain a CSU, but you probably already know that. I 
just mention that so that everyone can stop scratching their collective 
heads. There was an FCC requirement for the functions of a CSU, but I 
don't know if it's still in effect or if it matters for you. (see below)

The CSU is as much for your protection as the telco's. The CSU helps to 
isolate you from things like lightning strikes, and electrical hazards.

Most, if not all, of the functions of the CSU are handled by the smart 
jack these days. Line conditioning being the exception. Most smart jacks 
provide loopback, diagnostics, and in some cases line monitoring.

You may not get any help from your provider if you don't have a CSU on 
the line, but you will probably not be cut off since the smart jack is 
providing the functions required. This is a very different situation 
from the past when diagnostic and loopback functions were only available 
through a CSU.

I mentioned line conditioning above. Keep in mind that your service is 
working now, but if conditions should change, and the signal degrades, 
you may experience an outage. It's my understanding that a CSU will help 
prevent that.

So, no, you don't absolutely HAVE to have a CSU these day if the 
conditions are just right, but it's cheap insurance against some types 
of damage and signal loss, and will increase the likely-hood that your 
carrier will actually help you if there's a problem.

--
Jeff Davis
Netsource Consulting

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
On 6/14/07, Nick Seraphin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote:

  On 6/13/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still
didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a
CSU in it, and it is working fine and yes it is a T1 providing PRI.
  
   sarcasm
   Dang shmaltz.  You've convinced us - we've all been wasting our
   precious money on CSUs this whole time.  We're all idiots!
   /sarcasm
  
   Seriously - if you're so sure about your card not having a CSU, what
   is the make/model?  Pony up, man.
 
  It's a Panasonic KX-TA0187 for T1, or KX-TA02290
 
  The docs and technicians say it doesn have one AND that the FCC
  requires it. Hence my qeustion does the FCC require it.


 I think what he's referring to is really the KX-TD187... which is a T1
 interface module for the Panasonic KX-TD1232 Digital Hybrid Phone System
 (I have one of these systems, but not the T1 module).

No, I am reffering to KX-TA0187 which is a T1 card for the Panaosnic
KX-TDA line. and the KX-TA0290 which is a PRI card for the Panasonic
KX-TDA line.


 Now there is a KX-TA1232 analog system, and maybe there was a KX-TA187
 module for it that has since been discontinued... but I think he meant the
 digital one.

 http://www.ablecomm.com/t1isdideq.html

 They do SAY it doesn't have a CSU... but it's beyond my understanding of
 how it could possibly work without one.

 They seem to sell a separate CSU module that can go with it.  Maybe he's
 just not seeing the extra little box because there's more wire between
 that and the demarc?

 Was this a system that was already installed for you?  Or did you install
 it yourself?  Maybe the CSU is external and you just didn't recognize/see
 it there?

No, I installed the system, it goes from smart jack to the PRI card in
the Panasonic KX-TDA200 thru the 0290 card


 When I first started working with T1's, most CSU's were external.  I still
 have several of them in storage in fact... and I still use external
 CSU/DSU's on my production network today. :-)  I'm typing this message and
 it will be sent over a T1 connected to 2 external CSU's before it reaches
 the internet.

 Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed
 to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have
 a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU
 on it.  They're very big on standards-compliance and stuff like that.
 Sometime look into their rules and regs about colocating equipment inside
 one of their CO's...  it's very very strict.

The last thing you say is why I am asking this question. The
compliance doesn't realy bother me that much, what I am afraid is if
the provider notices this and decides to cut it because of that.


 -- Nick


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread C F
What I am thinking is that a CSU could provide mutiple functions,
error handling, diagnostics and signal boosting, which is not built
into the Panasonic equipment, but the lower level signaling that a CSU
could provide is built into it, and that's why it works.
As far as I knew before I read it was that it shoudn't work, but
according to that documentation it is suppose to work.

On 6/14/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 6/14/07, Nick Seraphin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote:
 
   On 6/13/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/13/07, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is just weird I wrote it in caps so you can read it but you still
 didn't read it so here it is again: its a T1 card that does NOT have a
 CSU in it, and it is working fine and yes it is a T1 providing PRI.
   
sarcasm
Dang shmaltz.  You've convinced us - we've all been wasting our
precious money on CSUs this whole time.  We're all idiots!
/sarcasm
   
Seriously - if you're so sure about your card not having a CSU, what
is the make/model?  Pony up, man.
  
   It's a Panasonic KX-TA0187 for T1, or KX-TA02290
  
   The docs and technicians say it doesn have one AND that the FCC
   requires it. Hence my qeustion does the FCC require it.
 
 
  I think what he's referring to is really the KX-TD187... which is a T1
  interface module for the Panasonic KX-TD1232 Digital Hybrid Phone System
  (I have one of these systems, but not the T1 module).

 No, I am reffering to KX-TA0187 which is a T1 card for the Panaosnic
 KX-TDA line. and the KX-TA0290 which is a PRI card for the Panasonic
 KX-TDA line.

 
  Now there is a KX-TA1232 analog system, and maybe there was a KX-TA187
  module for it that has since been discontinued... but I think he meant the
  digital one.
 
  http://www.ablecomm.com/t1isdideq.html
 
  They do SAY it doesn't have a CSU... but it's beyond my understanding of
  how it could possibly work without one.
 
  They seem to sell a separate CSU module that can go with it.  Maybe he's
  just not seeing the extra little box because there's more wire between
  that and the demarc?
 
  Was this a system that was already installed for you?  Or did you install
  it yourself?  Maybe the CSU is external and you just didn't recognize/see
  it there?

 No, I installed the system, it goes from smart jack to the PRI card in
 the Panasonic KX-TDA200 thru the 0290 card

 
  When I first started working with T1's, most CSU's were external.  I still
  have several of them in storage in fact... and I still use external
  CSU/DSU's on my production network today. :-)  I'm typing this message and
  it will be sent over a T1 connected to 2 external CSU's before it reaches
  the internet.
 
  Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed
  to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have
  a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU
  on it.  They're very big on standards-compliance and stuff like that.
  Sometime look into their rules and regs about colocating equipment inside
  one of their CO's...  it's very very strict.

 The last thing you say is why I am asking this question. The
 compliance doesn't realy bother me that much, what I am afraid is if
 the provider notices this and decides to cut it because of that.

 
  -- Nick
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Alex Balashov
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote:

  but the lower level signaling that a CSU could provide is built into it

   Possible.  In any event, it is this function that describes the 
essential aspects of a CSU.  But I think the standard is very clear on
the requirements for OAMP stuff too.

--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-14 Thread Nick Seraphin

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, C F wrote:

  Bottom line is, no matter what the FCC says... and if somehow you managed
  to get it to work without a CSU... I believe the phone company would have
  a fit if they knew you connected equipment to their network without a CSU
  on it.  They're very big on standards-compliance and stuff like that.
  Sometime look into their rules and regs about colocating equipment inside
  one of their CO's...  it's very very strict.
 
 The last thing you say is why I am asking this question. The
 compliance doesn't realy bother me that much, what I am afraid is if
 the provider notices this and decides to cut it because of that.


Whether they would actually cut you off or not probably depends on A) if
they find out about it, and B) whoever finds out about it is a strict
play-by-the-rules kinda guy and/or has a grudge against you or is having a
bad day.  A lot of telco employees tend to look the other way...
especially if it's not their job to care about it.

But... they would have every right to terminate the service if you don't
have proper equipment connected to their network.  So if they DID decide
to terminate it, they would legally have the right to do so, and you would
have no recourse other than possibly to purchase the correct equipment and
maybe pay a reconnect fee to get service turned back on, which may take
days/weeks/whatever time frame to do so.

So it's basically a question of, can you afford the downtime caused by
them shutting you off if/when they ever found out and/or cared enough to
follow the rules.

The other possibility, considering it is working for you now, is that
there IS a CSU built in but they don't want to tell you... maybe for
example because it's not FCC certified... or so that they can charge you
for an external CSU.

-- Nick



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-11 Thread Jon Pounder

Quoting C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Do the Digium cards have a built in CSU?
Is a CSU an FCC requirement? or just a carrier requirement?


if you expect things to work you need one regardless of regulations,  
yes the digium cards have it built in, as do most modern t1 cards.


if the T1 terminates in something that looks like a scsi connector  
you have an hssi interface most likely, if it terminates in an rj45,  
especially if it has status lights, you most likely have yourself a  
csu built in, sometimes you'll have a db15 instead of the rj45  
depending on the country it was designed for but it still works the  
same if you just get a passive adapter to get to the connector type  
you need (or make one, t1 speed is a 1/8th of the slowest ethernet so  
construction technique is not too critical if you ever made an  
ethernet cable)



coming in from the raw copper pair this is what needs to be there :

telco supplied pairgain box which is normally an HDSL modem that  
gets you from a type of dsl circuit to a 2 pair T1 / DS1 circuit  
(don't confuse DSL and DS ONE in this sentence)


that is the actual demarcation point.

then comes your csu/(dsu)
This is the point where remote loopback tests can be done without  
actually talking to the guts of your hardware, telco can normally do  
it to their box as well but when they do a line test they loop to your  
csu normally.


next comes a serial interface of some sort, in a more modern setup its  
indivisible from the csu, in the old days you had a physical  
synchronous serial cable between running at t1 clock speed.


Where its separate the serial port is also known as an hssi connection  
or high speed serial interface.



So without the csu in the mix converting the t1 channel frame encoding  
down to the actual serial data, you have no way to talk to the channel.


its like saying I have a usb port, do I really need the ethernet  
dongle in order to plug it into an ethernet jack ? Then again some  
hardware has an ethernet jack right on it, but it still has all the  
same ethernet hardware as the dongle in there somewhere even if there  
is no physical usb path between the pci bus and the ethernet, it still  
accomplishes the same thing.


the csu is sort of like the part of the modem where the start and stop  
bits are added into the actual data before hitting the actual modem  
proper where the bits are converted to tones, we don't generally make  
the distinction on that part of the circuit since the rest is useless  
without it.












TIA
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




Jon Pounder

   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/
_/_/_/  _/  _/ _/_/_/  _/  _/_/
   _/_/  _/_/  _/ _/_/  _/_/  _/
_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/


Inline Internet Systems Inc.
Thorold, Ontario, Canada

Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions
www.inline.net
www.ihtml.com
www.ihtmlmerchant.com
www.opayc.com


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-11 Thread C F

On 6/11/07, Jon Pounder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Quoting C F [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Do the Digium cards have a built in CSU?
 Is a CSU an FCC requirement? or just a carrier requirement?

if you expect things to work you need one regardless of regulations,
yes the digium cards have it built in, as do most modern t1 cards.


I disagree with this, I have several T1s that don't use Digium
equipment and are directly connecting to T1 cards that DONT have a CSU
and work fine. The reason this thing came up was because I was going
thru documentation for such a card and it mentioned it's an FCC
requirement.



if the T1 terminates in something that looks like a scsi connector
you have an hssi interface most likely, if it terminates in an rj45,
especially if it has status lights, you most likely have yourself a
csu built in, sometimes you'll have a db15 instead of the rj45
depending on the country it was designed for but it still works the
same if you just get a passive adapter to get to the connector type
you need (or make one, t1 speed is a 1/8th of the slowest ethernet so
construction technique is not too critical if you ever made an
ethernet cable)


coming in from the raw copper pair this is what needs to be there :

telco supplied pairgain box which is normally an HDSL modem that
gets you from a type of dsl circuit to a 2 pair T1 / DS1 circuit
(don't confuse DSL and DS ONE in this sentence)

that is the actual demarcation point.

then comes your csu/(dsu)
This is the point where remote loopback tests can be done without
actually talking to the guts of your hardware, telco can normally do
it to their box as well but when they do a line test they loop to your
csu normally.

next comes a serial interface of some sort, in a more modern setup its
indivisible from the csu, in the old days you had a physical
synchronous serial cable between running at t1 clock speed.

Where its separate the serial port is also known as an hssi connection
or high speed serial interface.


So without the csu in the mix converting the t1 channel frame encoding
down to the actual serial data, you have no way to talk to the channel.

its like saying I have a usb port, do I really need the ethernet
dongle in order to plug it into an ethernet jack ? Then again some
hardware has an ethernet jack right on it, but it still has all the
same ethernet hardware as the dongle in there somewhere even if there
is no physical usb path between the pci bus and the ethernet, it still
accomplishes the same thing.

the csu is sort of like the part of the modem where the start and stop
bits are added into the actual data before hitting the actual modem
proper where the bits are converted to tones, we don't generally make
the distinction on that part of the circuit since the rest is useless
without it.



That specific T1/PRI card I'm talking about has an JR45 connector and
does not have a built in CSU. Which brings me back to the second part
of my original question, is it required by law.

Thank you












 TIA
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Jon Pounder

_/_/_/  _/_/  _/   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/
 _/_/_/  _/  _/ _/_/_/  _/  _/_/
_/_/  _/_/  _/ _/_/  _/_/  _/
_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/


Inline Internet Systems Inc.
Thorold, Ontario, Canada

Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions
www.inline.net
www.ihtml.com
www.ihtmlmerchant.com
www.opayc.com


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Slightly OT:CSU on Digium cards, and it's requirement

2007-06-11 Thread Alex Balashov

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, C F wrote:



I disagree with this, I have several T1s that don't use Digium
equipment and are directly connecting to T1 cards that DONT have a CSU
and work fine. The reason this thing came up was because I was going
thru documentation for such a card and it mentioned it's an FCC
requirement.


  That's not possible, unless the handoff you're getting is not actually
T1.  However, the card almost certainly has a very seamless, 
inline/onboard CSU of which you aren't even aware of.


--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users