Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Steve Totaro wrote: On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:37:42AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:11:02AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) What version have you tried? Of Zaptel and of the kernel? AFAIK 1.4.9.2 builds with latest kernel (or maybe there's actually a small warning with our drivers, fixed in SVN) Please provide an error log. Yes, zaptel 1.4.9.2 does compile against a 2.6.24.4 source tree, although the latest release on the website (something like a week ago) was 1.4.8 which doesn't: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.4.8]# make make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make -C /lib/modules/2.6.24/build SUBDIRS=/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8 HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' WARNING: Symbol version dump /usr/src/linux-2.6.24/Module.symvers is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions. scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8/Makefile. Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS. Stop. make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yeah, fixed long ago in 1.4.9 (even though there's a very simple workaround for it) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir Another vote for 1.2.X. Openvox is the same as Digium TDM400P, it is the reference design and the cards are made very well. I suggest trying a Sangoma card. I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is there anyone in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just wasting my time? James ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:42:48AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is there anyone in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just wasting my time? Before going further in wasting time, what do you have in zapata.conf ? (And for the record: I don't think 1.2 should be any better than 1.4 in picking up caller ID) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Hi James, I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is there anyone in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just wasting my time? I can (after many hours of testing) confirm that Zaptel 1.4.5.1 with the following patch to wctd.c does appear to give the best results. http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9264 (However fails to patch against any newer version of Zaptel) Distinctive ring is broken :( it reports 0,0,0 for both ring types. So to conclude, Zaptel 1.4.5.1 + patch and Asterisk 1.4.19 - does appear to work. I am just confused why the patch above has failed to make it into the main Zaptel branch as this would resolve the CID problem for a lot of people. Matt ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, James Williamson wrote: I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is there anyone in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just wasting my time? I have it working on TDM400Ps under 1.2.x Applying the patch mentioned earlier was pretty crucial... # lsmod Module Size Used by zttranscode 6408 0 wctdm 32544 1 zaptel194360 6 zttranscode,wctdm oslec 7640 1 zaptel Extract from 'dmesg': Open Source Line Echo Canceller Installed Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Zaptel Version: 1.2.23 Zaptap registered 'sample' char driver on major 33 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 12 PCI: setting IRQ 12 as level-triggered ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:14.0[A] - Link [LNKB] - GSI 12 (level, low) - IRQ 12 Freshmaker version: 73 Freshmaker passed register test Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Module 1: Not installed Module 2: Not installed Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (UK mode) Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (2 modules) Registered tone zone 4 (United Kingdom) This is in /etc/moprobe.d/dsx: options wctdm opermode=UK and this is in /etc/modprobe.d/zaptel # automatically generated file; do not edit install wctdm /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install wctdm $CMDLINE_OPTS /sbin/ztcfg install ztdummy /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install ztdummy $CMDLINE_OPTS /sbin/ztcfg alias wcfxs wctdm alias wct2xxp wct4xxp # cat /etc/zaptel.conf fxoks=1 fxsks=4 loadzone=uk defaultzone=uk dsx:/etc# cat /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf ; zapata.conf: [trunkgroups] [channels] ; Default settings applicable to all channels usecallerid=yes cidsignalling=v23 cidstart=polarity hidecallerid=no callwaiting=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes echocancel=yes ;echotraining=yes ;echocancelwhenbridged=yes immediate=no faxdetect=no ; Channel 4: PSTN line context=incoming group=1 usecallerid=yes faxdetect=none signalling=fxs_ks rxgain=8 txgain=8 callerid=asreceived channel = 4 And a call: # rasterisk Asterisk 1.2.26.1, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2007 Digium, Inc. and others. Created by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asterisk comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; type 'show warranty' for details. This is free software, with components licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 and other licenses; you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. = Connected to Asterisk 1.2.26.1 currently running on dsx (pid = 18853) dsx*CLI set verbose 9 Verbosity was 0 and is now 9 == Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 4 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' -- Executing NoOp(Zap/4-1, INCOMING CALL - From: 07712191046) in new stack Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Hi Tzafrir, As I can see from that report, a modified version of that patch was applied to 1.4: http://bugs.digium.com/9264#80824 It was reverted right before the release of 1.4.8, as it required more testing, and re-applied immediately after it. Hence 1.4.9[.2] includes it. I did download and compile 1.4.9.2 - however CID still gets missed and I get the dreaded... [Apr 5 16:21:13] NOTICE[12685]: chan_zap.c:6191 ss_thread: Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)... [Apr 5 16:21:15] WARNING[12685]: chan_zap.c:6254 ss_thread: CID timed out waiting for ring. Exiting simple switch Some calls seem to capture the CID, but a majority get missed. So hence I reverted back to 1.4.5.1 + patch, which appears to work fine (no missed CID so far) Distinctive ring is broken :( it reports 0,0,0 for both ring types. Is it reported anywhere? I am digging for that now, there does appear to be quite a few bugs about distinctive ring. I was hoping by moving to Zaptel 1.4.9.2 - to resolve both issues or at least try to work out the problem from here and eliminate trying to fix something in an earlier release, in addition I also downloaded the latest svn but to no avail . 1.4.9.2 also introduced a BATTERTY / NO BATTERY issue for me which caused the calls to hang up on polarity reversal which is needed for the CID part i.e cidstart = polarity. I did play with the battthreash and debounce settings - but looking at other posts this was bad to change the values as it then caused other issues. I have been working on this now for a while and tried all sorts of suggestions, posts, patches - to little avail. I am not a defeatist and would like to help the project resolve these issues as this does seem to me to be a problem for many UK people with TDM4XX cards. I will keep going until I find a solution using the latest codebase. Matt ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:44:39AM +0100, Matt Brown wrote: Hi James, I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is there anyone in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just wasting my time? I can (after many hours of testing) confirm that Zaptel 1.4.5.1 with the following patch to wctd.c does appear to give the best results. http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9264 (However fails to patch against any newer version of Zaptel) As I can see from that report, a modified version of that patch was applied to 1.4: http://bugs.digium.com/9264#80824 It was reverted right before the release of 1.4.8, as it required more testing, and re-applied immediately after it. Hence 1.4.9[.2] includes it. Distinctive ring is broken :( it reports 0,0,0 for both ring types. Is it reported anywhere? -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Hi Tzafrir, As I can see from that report, a modified version of that patch was applied to 1.4: http://bugs.digium.com/9264#80824 It was reverted right before the release of 1.4.8, as it required more testing, and re-applied immediately after it. Hence 1.4.9[.2] includes it. I should have read the bug report http://bugs.digium.com/9264#8082 more carefully. I have now added the line: fwringdetect=1 to the /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf so the patched part of the code is then utilized. This is appears to be working and hopefully will make it into 1.4.10. Now to investigate the distinctive ring part :-) Matt ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Hi Tzafrir, Distinctive ring is broken :( it reports 0,0,0 for both ring types. Is it reported anywhere? http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6296 Would appear to be the best match, however due to lack of feedback, this bug was suspended. Matt ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:42:48AM +0100, James Williamson wrote:
I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is
there anyone
in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just
wasting my time?
Before going further in wasting time, what do you have in zapata.conf ?
(And for the record: I don't think 1.2 should be any better than 1.4 in
picking up caller ID)
I'm running a 2.6.22 kernel, zaptel 1.4.9.2 and asterisk 1.4.14. I've
ensured the driver is loaded in opermode=UK,
dmesg output:
wctdm24xxp: reg is a04c0004
Resetting the modules...
During Resetting the modules...
After resetting the modules...
Port 1: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO
Port 2: Installed -- AUTO FXO (UK mode)
Port 3: Not installed
Port 4: Not installed
VPM100: Not Present
Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM410P (4 modules)
My zapata.conf looks like this:
[trunkgroups]
[channels]
usecallerid=yes
cidsignalling=v23
cidstart=polarity
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=no
threewaycalling=yes
transfer=yes
echocancel=yes
;echotraining=yes
;echocancelwhenbridged=yes
immediate=no
faxdetect=no
fwringdetect=1
context=incoming
group=1
usecallerid=yes
faxdetect=none
signalling=fxs_ks
rxgain=8
txgain=8
callerid=asreceived
channel = 2
I've added a debug entry into my extension.conf:
[incoming]
exten = s,1,Verbose(Callerid = ${CALLERID} - ${CALLERIDNUM})
When I make an incoming call (I've got two landlines), I see this on my
terminal:
Asterisk Ready.
== Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 2
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'
[Apr 8 13:29:11] NOTICE[6815]: chan_zap.c:6171 ss_thread: Got event 2
(Ring/Answered)...
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Verbose(Zap/2-1, Callerid = - )
in new stack
Callerid = -
== Auto fallthrough, channel 'Zap/2-1' status is 'UNKNOWN'
-- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'
[Apr 8 13:29:13] NOTICE[6815]: cdr.c:434 ast_cdr_free: CDR on channel
'Zap/2-1' not posted
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Verbose(Zap/2-1, Callerid = - )
in new stack
Callerid = -
== Auto fallthrough, channel 'Zap/2-1' status is 'UNKNOWN'
-- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'
[Apr 8 13:29:16] NOTICE[6816]: cdr.c:434 ast_cdr_free: CDR on channel
'Zap/2-1' not posted
== Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 2
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'
[Apr 8 13:29:28] WARNING[6817]: chan_zap.c:6234 ss_thread: CID timed
out waiting for ring. Exiting simple switch
-- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'
[Apr 8 13:29:28] NOTICE[6817]: cdr.c:434 ast_cdr_free: CDR on channel
'Zap/2-1' not posted
Executing last minute cleanups
The penultimate line appears after I hang up.
James
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
As I can see from that report, a modified version of that patch was applied to 1.4: http://bugs.digium.com/9264#80824 It was reverted right before the release of 1.4.8, as it required more testing, and re-applied immediately after it. Hence 1.4.9[.2] includes it. I should have read the bug report http://bugs.digium.com/9264#8082 more carefully. I have now added the line: fwringdetect=1 to the /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf so the patched part of the code is then utilized. This is appears to be working and hopefully will make it into 1.4.10. Now to investigate the distinctive ring part :-) Hmm scratch that ! (apologies for any line wraps) It would appear its still broken .. and introduces a new bug ! [Apr 8 13:42:54] NOTICE[5846]: chan_zap.c:6234 ss_thread: CallerID number: 07875-xx, name: (null), flags=4 -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Verbose(Zap/4-1, Incoming call from BT line CallerID= 07875xx) in new stack Incoming call from BT line CallerID= 07875xx -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] GotoIf(Zap/4-1, 0?3:8) in new stack -- Goto (incoming,s,8) -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:8] Set(Zap/4-1, CALLERID(all)=Incoming Call: 07875xx) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9] MixMonitor(Zap/4-1, 1207658573.0.gsm) in new stack -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:10] Dial(Zap/4-1, ZAP/1r1||tr) in new stack -- Called 1r1 == Begin MixMonitor Recording Zap/4-1 -- Zap/1-1 is ringing -- Zap/1-1 is ringing -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 10) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1' == End MixMonitor Recording Zap/4-1 Second try == Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 4 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' [Apr 8 13:43:09] NOTICE[5848]: chan_zap.c:6191 ss_thread: Got event 2 (Ring/Answered)... [Apr 8 13:43:11] WARNING[5848]: chan_zap.c:6254 ss_thread: CID timed out waiting for ring. Exiting simple switch -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1' Third try ... (bug appears) == Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 4 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' [Apr 8 13:43:12] NOTICE[5849]: chan_zap.c:6191 ss_thread: Got event 4 (Alarm)... [Apr 8 13:43:12] NOTICE[5849]: chan_zap.c:4185 zt_handle_event: Alarm cleared on channel 4 [Apr 8 13:43:14] WARNING[5849]: chan_zap.c:6254 ss_thread: CID timed out waiting for ring. Exiting simple switch -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1' Some calls do show CID (as above) others do not - mainly not .. then as above if I call a second or third time the following happens ... (never on first call !) The call is answered and I get a high pitch tone for around 5 secs then the line goes quiet, However the Zap channel then remains open for upto 1min or more then resets The kernel/syslog shows this BATTERY NO BATTERY issue Apr 8 13:42:59 max kernel: [17434415.32] NO RING on 1/4! Apr 8 13:42:59 max kernel: [17434415.58] Setting FXS hook state to 0 (00) Apr 8 13:43:09 max kernel: [17434425.22] RING on 1/4! Apr 8 13:43:09 max kernel: [17434425.22] 63639009 Polarity reversed (-1 - 1) Apr 8 13:43:09 max kernel: [17434425.476000] NO RING on 1/4! Apr 8 13:43:10 max kernel: [17434426.964000] RING on 1/4! Apr 8 13:43:12 max kernel: [17434428.148000] NO RING on 1/4! Apr 8 13:43:12 max kernel: [17434428.388000] 63639801 Polarity reversed (1 - -1) Apr 8 13:43:12 max kernel: [17434428.804000] NO BATTERY on 1/4! Apr 8 13:43:12 max kernel: [17434428.90] BATTERY on 1/4 (-)! This is new, and have not seen this in 1.4.5.1 + patch ... I think I will have to stay on this version until I can find out what is going on ... Is is possible to get very verbose granular debug info out of Zaptel ? I have debug=1 and tried debug=9 in the modprobe section . but this is the most I get from Zaptel. Matt ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, James Williamson wrote: Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) before I finally got the kernel to build and recognise the device. Can't get callerid to work, have followed the instructions to the letter, does it really have to be this hard? Must say I'm tempted to just send the card back and forget about it and just use Cisco CallManager. Digium's support to be fair have been responsive but unable to help. I've looked at the OpenVox cards and will probably buy one of them next time I need an analogue card - eg. http://www.voipon.co.uk/openvox-analog-cards-openvox-a400p-c-23_160_161_164.html And I've stuck with 1.2 for the time being... There is a patch mentioned here recently to make UK callerId work, and also OSLEC is essential (and bloody good!) UK CID Distinctive Ring Detection. No experience of this though.. ( or is there an Asterisk version and Zaptel version in the 1.4 branch that fixes these issues ? ) Go back to 1.2. Right now my own feeling is that 1.4 creates more problems than it solves - certinly for my application of asterisk (which is mostly the SME PBX market and a couple of virtual PBX boxes with SIP and IAX trunks). Gordon ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:11:02AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) What version have you tried? Of Zaptel and of the kernel? AFAIK 1.4.9.2 builds with latest kernel (or maybe there's actually a small warning with our drivers, fixed in SVN) Please provide an error log. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:37:42AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:11:02AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) What version have you tried? Of Zaptel and of the kernel? AFAIK 1.4.9.2 builds with latest kernel (or maybe there's actually a small warning with our drivers, fixed in SVN) Please provide an error log. Yes, zaptel 1.4.9.2 does compile against a 2.6.24.4 source tree, although the latest release on the website (something like a week ago) was 1.4.8 which doesn't: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.4.8]# make make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make -C /lib/modules/2.6.24/build SUBDIRS=/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8 HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' WARNING: Symbol version dump /usr/src/linux-2.6.24/Module.symvers is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions. scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8/Makefile. Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS. Stop. make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yeah, fixed long ago in 1.4.9 (even though there's a very simple workaround for it) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:37:42AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:11:02AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) What version have you tried? Of Zaptel and of the kernel? AFAIK 1.4.9.2 builds with latest kernel (or maybe there's actually a small warning with our drivers, fixed in SVN) Please provide an error log. Yes, zaptel 1.4.9.2 does compile against a 2.6.24.4 source tree, although the latest release on the website (something like a week ago) was 1.4.8 which doesn't: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.4.8]# make make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make -C /lib/modules/2.6.24/build SUBDIRS=/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8 HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' WARNING: Symbol version dump /usr/src/linux-2.6.24/Module.symvers is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions. scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8/Makefile. Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS. Stop. make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 Yeah, fixed long ago in 1.4.9 (even though there's a very simple workaround for it) -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir Another vote for 1.2.X. Openvox is the same as Digium TDM400P, it is the reference design and the cards are made very well. I suggest trying a Sangoma card. Thanks, Steve Totaro ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:11:02AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) What version have you tried? Of Zaptel and of the kernel? AFAIK 1.4.9.2 builds with latest kernel (or maybe there's actually a small warning with our drivers, fixed in SVN) Please provide an error log. Yes, zaptel 1.4.9.2 does compile against a 2.6.24.4 source tree, although the latest release on the website (something like a week ago) was 1.4.8 which doesn't: [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.4.8]# make make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make -C /lib/modules/2.6.24/build SUBDIRS=/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8 HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' WARNING: Symbol version dump /usr/src/linux-2.6.24/Module.symvers is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions. scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in /usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8/Makefile. Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS. Stop. make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' make: *** [all] Error 2 James -- James Williamson www.nameonthe.net tel: (+44) 870 1657215 direct: (+44) 1491 413609 fax: (+44) 1491 413606 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Hosting Java since 1999' email disclaimer: http://www.nameonthe.net/disclaimer.jsp ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
try sangoma.com card, easy to use, hardware echo cancel, and carrier quality. matt - Original Message - From: James Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 10:11 PM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ? Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) before I finally got the kernel to build and recognise the device. Can't get callerid to work, have followed the instructions to the letter, does it really have to be this hard? Must say I'm tempted to just send the card back and forget about it and just use Cisco CallManager. Digium's support to be fair have been responsive but unable to help. James Hi, I am feeling very frustrated with the Digium TDM400P, I have 3 x FXS 1x FXO modules and I have tried various things and different versions of Asterisk and Zaptel to no avail. Clearly there are issues with this card, so I am wondering - is there a card out there that does the following without the inherent problems of the TDM400 ? I.e a card that can reliably do: UK CID Distinctive Ring Detection. Any pointers would be great. Thanks. ( or is there an Asterisk version and Zaptel version in the 1.4 branch that fixes these issues ? ) Matt Brown ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] UK POTS - Is there a better card than TDM400P available ?
Snap, Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to buy a TDM410P because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It took three 2.6 kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel release) before I finally got the kernel to build and recognise the device. Can't get callerid to work, have followed the instructions to the letter, does it really have to be this hard? Must say I'm tempted to just send the card back and forget about it and just use Cisco CallManager. Digium's support to be fair have been responsive but unable to help. James Hi, I am feeling very frustrated with the Digium TDM400P, I have 3 x FXS 1x FXO modules and I have tried various things and different versions of Asterisk and Zaptel to no avail. Clearly there are issues with this card, so I am wondering - is there a card out there that does the following without the inherent problems of the TDM400 ? I.e a card that can reliably do: UK CID Distinctive Ring Detection. Any pointers would be great. Thanks. ( or is there an Asterisk version and Zaptel version in the 1.4 branch that fixes these issues ? ) Matt Brown ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
