Re: preview-latex.el
>>>>> Tassilo Horn writes:
> Colin Baxter writes:
>> What's happened to preview-latex.el? I notice it's absent from a
>> fresh git clone.
> It's generated by running make.
Of course! Thanks.
preview-latex.el
What's happened to preview-latex.el? I notice it's absent from a fresh git clone. Colin.
Re: AUCTeX to compile each \include file to a separate file
> Arash Esbati writes: > Hi Kourosh, kaykal writes: >> Is there anyway to generate different PDF files for each included >> file in master file with AUCTeX. >> >> More specifically, I have one master file called “master”, in >> which, I have included two chapters: “chapter01” and “chapter02”. >> I want AUCTeX (after appropriate number of runs) to generate one >> PDF for the master file, one PDF for chapter01, one PDF for >> chapter02 and (the bonus) one PDF for bibliography. > I'm not sure how you plan to do that, but one solution comes to my > mind is using \includeonly in the preamble and control the output > with it. > See here for details: > http://latexref.xyz/_005cinclude-_0026-_005cincludeonly.html > Best, Arash \includeonly and use refsection to make bibliographies per chapter. See this stackexchange question: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/87414/per-chapter-bibliographies-in-biblatex. If individual chapter biographies are not necessary then why not use something like PDFtk to split the master pdf into chapter pdfs? Good luck.
Re: On the usage and function of TeX-auto-generate-global and TeX-auto-global.
>>>>> Hongyi Zhao writes:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 9:42 PM Colin Baxter wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Hongyi Zhao writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 9:19 PM Colin Baxter wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello Hongyi
>> >>
>> >> I'm curious - what's your setting for the variable >>
>> "TeX-auto-local"?
>>
>> > `M-x describe-variable RET TeX-auto-local RET'
Thanks - I didn't know that.
Best wishes,
Re: On the usage and function of TeX-auto-generate-global and TeX-auto-global.
>>>>> Hongyi Zhao writes: > On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 9:19 PM Colin Baxter wrote: >> >> Hello Hongyi >> >> I'm curious - what's your setting for the variable >> "TeX-auto-local"? > `M-x describe-variable RET TeX-auto-local RET' > TeX-auto-local is a variable defined in ‘tex.el’. Thanks. I asked because I've set my TeX-auto-local to ~/.emacs.d/auctex/auto-local. It seems to be the only 'TeX-local' variable that ever gets used. I have set TeX-auto-global to ~/.emacs.d/auctex/auto-global and it's always empty. I guess all the work is being done by TeX-auto-local. I have certainly wondered when Tex-auto-global is ever used. Best wishes, Colin.
Re: On the usage and function of TeX-auto-generate-global and TeX-auto-global.
Hello Hongyi I'm curious - what's your setting for the variable "TeX-auto-local"? Best wishes, Colin Baxter.
Re: TeX-next-error log buffer
Dear Ikumi, Thank you for this reply. > Ikumi Keita writes: > Hi Greg and Colin, > Greg Bognar writes: >> That is, there are two buffers involved: the *TeX Help* buffer >> with the error message, which is a read-only buffer and is >> updated without any echoed message; and the .log >> buffer, which is a file read from disk, and changing it results >> in an echoed message. (Assuming you have auto-revert mode >> enabled.) > Thank you, it seems that `global-auto-revert-mode' is the key to > this issue. I did observe the echoed message that Colin described > after I enabled `global-auto-revert-mode'. > (To Colin: AUCTeX does not always open the log file when C-c ` is > typed. AUCTeX has its own error message catalogue in > `TeX-error-description-list' and checks if the current error is > listed in this catalogue. If found, AUCTeX displays the message in > the catalogue and does not open the log file. Hence it's necessary > to cause error not listed in the catalogue in order to make AUCTeX > to open the log file intentionally.) That explains why sometimes the log buffer opened yet another times it didn't and I was therefore unable to reproduce the error. I've confirmed this by examining my TeX-error-description-list, deliberating inserting an appropriate error in my document and then compiling. I've been using auctex for over 20 years and in that time I have never once used "Tex-next-error" until last week. So the occasional opening and reverting of the log buffer seemed very odd behaviour to me. >> If this is indeed what happens, one option is to set >> `auto-revert-verbose' to nil, another is to add fundamental-mode >> (in which the log file is opened) to >> `global-auto-revert-ignore-modes'. > Colin, do these workarounds suit you? These work, but I think I'd rather keep the verbose reverting - they are useful for other modes. Now that I know what is happening I can just delete the log buffer by hand. Thank you Ikumi (and Greg) for helping me with this. I would never have discovered what was happening myself and just thrown it onto the large pile of stuff called "Unexplained". Best wishes, Colin.
Re: TeX-next-error log buffer
Hello Greg, >>>>> Greg Bognar via General discussion about AUCTeX writes: >> >>>>> Ikumi Keita writes: >>>>> Colin Baxter >> writes: > > When the error is corrected and >> the file is re-compiled, the log buffer is > > updated with an >> echoed message. The log buffer is not deleted and on every > > >> compilation thereafter the echoed update-message is again >> displayed. >> >> > That doesn't occur for me. My emacs opens the log file in >> read-only > buffer and doesn't pay attention whether the log file >> is updated or not. > Could you provide more detail? >> >> Well, this is most embarrassing. I find I cannot reproduce the >> effect and indeed the log file behaves exactly as you stated. I >> will watch things carefully and report back if I can reproduce >> it. In the meantime, please accept my apologies for wasting your >> time. > Perhaps I misundertood, but I thought Colin meant: for some TeX > errors, AUCTeX opens the log file that TeX creates, and it is > reverted on each subsequent TeX run, resulting in a message in the > echo area which is indeed annoying. That is what I meant. > That is, there are two buffers involved: the *TeX Help* buffer > with the error message, which is a read-only buffer and is updated > without any echoed message; and the .log buffer, which > is a file read from disk, and changing it results in an echoed > message. (Assuming you have auto-revert mode enabled.) I had global-auto-revert-mode on. > If this is indeed what happens, one option is to set > `auto-revert-verbose' to nil, another is to add fundamental-mode > (in which the log file is opened) to > `global-auto-revert-ignore-modes'. Again, unless I misunderstood > what the problem is in the first place. I have managed to get myself confused. As I reported earlier, I don't seem able to reproduce the error. I need to take a step back and approach the problem in a logical manner (this I hadn't done since I was busy trying to finish writing a document). I will report back. Best wishes, Colin.
Re: TeX-next-error log buffer
Hello Keita, >>>>> Ikumi Keita writes: >>>>> Colin Baxter writes: >> When the error is corrected and the file is re-compiled, the log >> buffer is updated with an echoed message. The log buffer is not >> deleted and on every compilation thereafter the echoed >> update-message is again displayed. > That doesn't occur for me. My emacs opens the log file in > read-only buffer and doesn't pay attention whether the log file is > updated or not. Could you provide more detail? > Regards, Ikumi Keita Well, this is most embarrassing. I find I cannot reproduce the effect and indeed the log file behaves exactly as you stated. I will watch things carefully and report back if I can reproduce it. In the meantime, please accept my apologies for wasting your time. Best wishes, Colin Baxter.
TeX-next-error log buffer
Hello, A tex compiling-error can be examined by TeX-next-error, bounded to C-c `. This gives in the background a buffer containing the tex log file. When the error is corrected and the file is re-compiled, the log buffer is updated with an echoed message. The log buffer is not deleted and on every compilation thereafter the echoed update-message is again displayed. I find this to be distracting. Is there any way to automatically delete the log buffer after a successful compilation? Best wishes, Colin Baxter. Colin Baxter URL: http://www.Colin-Baxter.com - GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8 - Since mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself. A. Einstein
Re: latexmk default compilation
> Denis Bitouzé writes:
> Le 11/09/20 à 12h50, François Patte a écrit :
>> Is it possible to run latexmk as the default compilator while
>> using Ctrl-c-c in auctex?
> Maybe with this (don't know if it is enough):
> (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook '(lambda () (setq TeX-command-default
> "Latexmk")))
If the above doesn't work for you, try
(setq org-latex-pdf-process '("latexmk -outdir=%o -f %f"))
Best wishes,
Re: pstricks style
>>>>> Ikumi Keita writes:
> Hi Colin,
>>>>> Colin Baxter writes:
>> I do indeed have TeX-PDF-mode disabled by default. All my tex
>> documents contain dvi-only and pdf-only options. Once I have
>> everything working satisfactorily to produce a dvi output then I
>> switch to latemk to generate a final pdf file - if required. I
>> can therefore hardly complain if your proposed changes will not
>> effect me. Thanks for the information.
> I think that you won't be affected by agressive approach (2),
> provided that you customize TeX-PDF-mode to nil. I confirmed that
> by changing pstricks.el locally. After disabling TeX-PDF-mode, the
> following file generates dvi and tries to open viewer associated
> with "dvips and gv" option by repeated C-c C-c.
> \documentclass{article} \usepackage{pstricks} \begin{document}
> dummy text \end{document}
> %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: t %%% End:
> (When I erase cutomization of TeX-PDF-mode and let it to be t,
> repeated C-c C-c then generates pdf by dvips and ps2pdf according
> to TeX-PDF-from-DVI being "Dvips", as expected.)
> As far as I can see, approach (2) affects only those who don't
> customize TeX-PDF-mode AND expect AUCTeX to turn it off
> per-document basis by detecting the presence of
> \usepackage{pstricks}. That is, those who think "I let
> TeX-PDF-mode to be t because I want to use pdflatex for ordinary
> LaTeX documents. However, AUCTeX should automatically turn off PDF
> mode for documents with \usepackage{pstricks} as exception."
Hello Keita,
Yes, I agree with you. I have TeX-PDF-mode set to nil so I wont be
affected. Thank you for your time and the information.
Best wishes,
Colin Baxter
--
Colin Baxter
URL: http://www.Colin-Baxter.com
Re: pstricks style
>>>>> Jean-Jacques Rétorré writes: > jeu. 30 juil. 2020, Colin Baxter disait : >>>>>>> Jean-Jacques Rétorré writes: >> >> - Cut >> >> > jeu. 30 juil. 2020, Ikumi Keita disait : > >> I think most of nowadays AUCTeX users wants to have pdf output > >> since Emacs can display it. For my own, if would use the > >> aggressive approach (2).. >> >> Please do not go down that route. I for one use dvi and should I >> want pdf then I use latexmk. I cannot speak for most Auctex users >> but then nor can anyone else. >> > Does it change the way you do things? In particular this does not > affect the operation of latexmk, nor the suite of compilations > when TeX-PDF-mode is disabled. I do indeed have TeX-PDF-mode disabled by default. All my tex documents contain dvi-only and pdf-only options. Once I have everything working satisfactorily to produce a dvi output then I switch to latemk to generate a final pdf file - if required. I can therefore hardly complain if your proposed changes will not effect me. Thanks for the information. Colin. -- Colin Baxter URL: http://www.Colin-Baxter.com
Re: pstricks style
>>>>> Jean-Jacques Rétorré writes: - Cut > jeu. 30 juil. 2020, Ikumi Keita disait : > I think most of nowadays AUCTeX users wants to have pdf output > since Emacs can display it. For my own, if would use the > aggressive approach (2).. Please do not go down that route. I for one use dvi and should I want pdf then I use latexmk. I cannot speak for most Auctex users but then nor can anyone else. Colin. Colin Baxter URL: http://www.Colin-Baxter.com
Re: math font locking has disappeared
Dear Ikumi,
>>>>> Ikumi Keita writes:
>> With the latest auctex, all my coloring for
>> \begin{equation},\end{equation} \begin(eqnarray),\end{eqnarray}
>> has gone and is now the same as that for $$ and \[,\]. How do I
>> get it back??
> Hmm, it did undergo a major overhaul recently, but those
> highlighting is fine on my side with the latest master brach of
> git repo. Could you please provide more detail about your
> settings?
Thank you for your email.
I am wrong. I had been running emacs for several days and things must
have become corrupted. After re-launching emacs, the apparent problem
disappeared. I've cancelled the original post, but obviously too late.
I am sorry for the unnecessary posting.
Best wishes,
Colin.
Colin Baxter
URL: http://www.Colin-Baxter.com
math font locking has disappeared
Hello,
With the latest auctex, all my coloring for \begin{equation},\end{equation}
\begin(eqnarray),\end{eqnarray} has gone and is now the same as that for
$$ and \[,\]. How do I get it back??
Best wishes,
Colin.
--
Colin Baxter
URL: http://www.Colin-Baxter.com
Re: font-latex-math-face
Dear Ikumi, >>>>> Ikumi Keita writes: > It doesn't work to set `font-latex-math-face' as variable because > that symbol is used as face, not variable in font-latex.el. How > about this? Yes, you're right. Sorry, I should have realised that. > %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% face-remapping-alist: > ((font-latex-math-face . (:foreground "#00"))) %%% End: > This works at least for me. And me too, Thanks. Best wishes, Colin. -- Colin Baxter www.Colin-Baxter.com - GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8 - The sole cause of all human misery is the inability of people to sit quietly in their rooms. Blaise Pascal, 1670 - Since mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself. A. Einstein
font-latex-math-face
Hello, How can I locally change the foreground of font-latex-math-face? I have tried %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% eval: (setq font-latex-math-face '(:foreground "#00")) %%% End: which doesn't work. Thanks. Best wishes, Colin.
Re: [AUCTeX] Use csquotes in Bibtex-Files
Dear Thomas,
>>>>> Thomas Hilarius Meyer writes:
> Hello, in my LaTeX-Documents I use the csquotes Package and I have
> put
> '(TeX-close-quote "}") '(TeX-open-quote "\\enquote{"))
> in my .emacs, so that by pressing " the correct quotation-mark is
> inserted.
> How can I manage, that also in Bibtex-Mode, the same key-binding
> is activated?
> Sorry for the maybe silly question, but I am just starting my
> Emacs-carreer... ;-)
I may be completely wrong here, so forgive me, but I was always under
the impression that csquotes (Context Sensitive Quotations) was only
for biblatex, not bibtex.
Best wishes,
--
Colin Baxter
m43...@yandex.com
-
GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8
-
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Overenthusiastic language detection
Dear Arash, >>>>> "Arash" == Arash Esbati writes: Arash> Colin Baxter writes: >> I always get confused between 'TeX-style-private' (default path: >> ~/.emacs.d/auctex/style) and 'TeX-style-local' (default path: >> style). Presumably one takes president over the other, but I've >> never investigated further. Arash> Hi Colin, Arash> check the value of `TeX-style-path'. Arash> Best, Arash Thank you. That is useful to know. Best wishes, Colin. -- -- Colin Baxter m43...@yandex.com GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8 ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Overenthusiastic language detection
>>>>> "gojjoe" == gojjoe writes: gojjoe> Hi Tristan and Arash, another possible simple solution is to gojjoe> copy and paste the "english.el" style file from your gojjoe> ~/.emacs.d/elpa/auctex-11.90.2/style/ gojjoe> directory into the one with your own style files, defined in gojjoe> TeX-style-local, which for me is gojjoe> ~/.emacs.d/auctex/.auctex-style/ gojjoe> and rename it there to "canadian.el". Of course you can also gojjoe> edit it to create your own canadian style file. I did gojjoe> something similar for the "british.el" style. gojjoe> Is that correct, people? I always get confused between 'TeX-style-private' (default path: ~/.emacs.d/auctex/style) and 'TeX-style-local' (default path: style). Presumably one takes president over the other, but I've never investigated further. Best wishes, Colin. -- -- Colin Baxter m43...@yandex.com GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8 ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] auctex not being loaded
On Thu, Mar 30 2017, Colin Baxter wrote:
> The latest auctex (commit 83a875b) no long allows me to view dvi or pdf
> files. My setting is
>
> (setq TeX-view-program-selection
> '((output-dvi "DVI Viewer")
> (output-pdf "PDF Viewer")))
> (setq TeX-view-program-list
> '(("DVI Viewer" "xdvi -sourceposition \"%n %b\" -editor \"%cS\"
> -geometry 917X736 -s 6 %o")
> ("PDF Viewer" "xpdf %o")))
>
> Nothing happens at all for xdvi and the xpdf request hangs emacs.
>
> Any ideas how I might rectify things?
>
> Colin.
Sorry, my mistake. I had inadvertently changed something in my ~/.emacs
that had a knock-on effect on auctex. All working now. Thanks for your
patience.
Colin.
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
[AUCTeX] auctex not being loaded
The latest auctex (commit 83a875b) no long allows me to view dvi or pdf
files. My setting is
(setq TeX-view-program-selection
'((output-dvi "DVI Viewer")
(output-pdf "PDF Viewer")))
(setq TeX-view-program-list
'(("DVI Viewer" "xdvi -sourceposition \"%n %b\" -editor \"%cS\" -geometry
917X736 -s 6 %o")
("PDF Viewer" "xpdf %o")))
Nothing happens at all for xdvi and the xpdf request hangs emacs.
Any ideas how I might rectify things?
Colin.
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] setting same color for math scripts as other math
Hi, On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Tamas, > > 2017-03-15 12:37 GMT+01:00 Tamas Papp : >> Hi, >> >> I can't see the DarkRed very well and would like math scripts to have >> the same color as other math in AUCTeX (burlywood in dark themes). How >> can I achieve this in Emacs Lisp (I could customize, but prefer not to, >> so that when I switch color themes it adjusts accordingly). >> >> Is there some Emacs Lisp magic that would copy colors from one face to >> another? > > To copy a specific attribute (foreground in this case) you can use > something like > > (with-eval-after-load "font-latex" > (set-face-attribute 'font-latex-script-char-face nil > :foreground (face-attribute 'font-latex-math-face > :foreground))) > > or replace the `(face-attribute ...)' with the color you like. > > I don't know if there is something simpler. You can inherit an entire > face with `:inherit` attribute, but that doesn't override other > attributes already set. > > Bye, > Mosè > > ___ > auctex mailing list > auctex@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex (face-spec-set 'font-latex-script-char-face '((t (:foreground "some-color"))) nil) also works for me. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] setting same color for math scripts as other math
Hello Tama, On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Tamas Papp wrote: > Hi, > > I can't see the DarkRed very well and would like math scripts to have > the same color as other math in AUCTeX (burlywood in dark themes). How > can I achieve this in Emacs Lisp (I could customize, but prefer not to, > so that when I switch color themes it adjusts accordingly). > > Is there some Emacs Lisp magic that would copy colors from one face to > another? > > Best, > > Tamas I quite agree about DarkRed - it's almost invisible. I edited line 1188 of font-latex.el and changed (:foreground "DarkRed")). Colin. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] font-latex-script-char-face
Hi Arash On Wed, Feb 22 2017, Arash Esbati wrote: > Colin Baxter writes: > >> I want to remove, outside of custom-set-faces, the foreground color option to >> font-latex-script-char-face. I've tried various combinations of >> >> (setq font-latex-script-char-face ((t nil))) >> >> all to non-avail. I'd be grateful for help. Thanks. > > Emacs manual says[1] > > Normally, a face is declared just once, using defface, and any > further changes to its appearance are applied using the Customize > framework (e.g., via the Customize user interface or via the > custom-set-faces function; see Applying Customizations), or by face > remapping (see Face Remapping). In the rare event that you need to > change a face spec directly from Lisp, you can use the face-spec-set > function. > > Since `font-latex-script-char-face' is declared with `defface', I would > try something like this (I didn't try, though): > > (face-spec-set font-latex-script-char-face >'((t nil))) > > Best, Arash > > Footnotes: > [1] > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Defining-Faces.html It seems I need to specify explicitly the foreground. This works: (face-spec-set 'font-latex-script-char-face '((t (:foreground nil))) nil) There may be a more elegant way, of course. Thank you. Best wishes, Colin. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
[AUCTeX] font-latex-script-char-face
I want to remove, outside of custom-set-faces, the foreground color option to font-latex-script-char-face. I've tried various combinations of (setq font-latex-script-char-face ((t nil))) all to non-avail. I'd be grateful for help. Thanks. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Quotation marks
I can answer my own question: use (setq TeX-quote-after-quote t). Next time I'll read the auctex info more carefully before asking a question. Sorry. On Fri, Jan 27 2017, Colin Baxter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27 2017, Colin Baxter wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> The appearance of quotation marks has recently changed. Setting >> font-latex-quotes to nil has removed the annoying highlighting, but I am >> still presented with ``some quotation''. How do I get back to "some >> quotation"? >> >> Thank you. > > Sorry, I'd forgotten that I normally use \lq and \rq for quotation marks > and do not enter them directly. However, I'm still curious as to how I > can could see a " when using auctex. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Quotation marks
On Fri, Jan 27 2017, Colin Baxter wrote: > Hello, > > The appearance of quotation marks has recently changed. Setting > font-latex-quotes to nil has removed the annoying highlighting, but I am > still presented with ``some quotation''. How do I get back to "some > quotation"? > > Thank you. Sorry, I'd forgotten that I normally use \lq and \rq for quotation marks and do not enter them directly. However, I'm still curious as to how I can could see a " when using auctex. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
[AUCTeX] Quotation marks
Hello, The appearance of quotation marks has recently changed. Setting font-latex-quotes to nil has removed the annoying highlighting, but I am still presented with ``some quotation''. How do I get back to "some quotation"? Thank you. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Syntax color in math-mode
On Fri, Jan 13 2017, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Colin, > > 2017-01-13 10:49 GMT+01:00 Colin Baxter : >> >> Hello, >> >> Has the syntax coloring in math mode changed recently? I notice that the >> exponent symbol ^ is now colored a very dark red, which makes it difficult to >> read against my black background. How can I get back to the original >> lighter coloring? >> >> I am using the latest git pull version of auctex and emacs-25.1.1. > > Yes, that changed a few days ago and this is described in the news > section of the manual > (https://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/manual/auctex.html#Changes): > >* AUCTeX is able to display several levels of super- and subscripts, > each one raised above and a bit smaller than its basis. For this > feature, have a look at the customize options > 'font-latex-fontify-script' (especially the new values > 'multi-level' and 'invisible') and > 'font-latex-fontify-script-max-level'. Also, the script characters > '^' and '_' are also fontified with a special face named > 'font-latex-script-char-face'. See Fontification of math, for > details. > > So you may want to customize `font-latex-script-char-face'. I suggest > you to keep it different from the rest of the equation, in order to > better highlight those characters. > > Bye, > Mosè > Dear Mosè, Thank you for the information. Colin. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
[AUCTeX] Syntax color in math-mode
Hello, Has the syntax coloring in math mode changed recently? I notice that the exponent symbol ^ is now colored a very dark red, which makes it difficult to read against my black background. How can I get back to the original lighter coloring? I am using the latest git pull version of auctex and emacs-25.1.1. Thanks, Colin. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Subfiles package and reftex
On Tue, Dec 27 2016, Mosè Giordano wrote: > Hi Colin, > > 2016-12-27 8:54 GMT+01:00 Colin Baxter : >> How is this any advantage over simply using \include(file1}? I must be >> missing something here. > > I don't use subfiles, but my understanding is that you can compile a > single subfile without changing anything in the source code. This is > particularly easy with AUCTeX, because in an included file C-c C-a (or > C-c C-c) compiles the current file, instead in master file it compiles > the whole document. Instead, with include mechanism you have to > select every time the file to be included with \includeonly, manually > editing the file whenever you want to switch between a single file or > the whole document or you want to change the single file to be > compiled. I don't know whether there are other advantages. > > Bye, > Mosè > Dear Mosè Ah, yes I understand. I'm always editing included files, which are my working files. My master just contains all the LaTeX options, packages, etc. I can see your use is a bit different. Thanks for the information; it's good to see how other people use auctex. Best wishes, Colin. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Subfiles package and reftex
On Mon, Dec 26 2016, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> Hi Edgar,
>
> 2016-12-26 5:14 GMT+01:00 :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I would like to know if there is a way to
>> (1) set a master file (Master.tex) which includes other files (\input,
>> \subfiles, \include or any other) with relative paths
>> (2) those other files (header.tex, File1.tex, File2.tex...) have labels (as
>> in \label{fig:NicePicture})
>> (3) set a cross-reference between those labels (File1.tex has
>> \label{fig:NicePicture} somewhere, and File2.tex has \cref{fig:NicePicture})
>> (4) set a bunch of styles (\usepackage, \newcommand, etc.) in one of the
>> external files (header.tex, for instance)
>> (5) use RefTeX to create those cross-references.
>>
>> Say, something like this:
>> |-Master.tex
>> |-preamble.tex
>> |-File1.tex
>> |-File2.tex
>>
>> But sometimes, I want to see how File2.tex looks like as a PDF before
>> compiling the whole thing. So, I set \usepackage{subfiles} in preamble.tex
>> and load it at the top of Master.tex with \input{preamble.tex}. This loads
>> all my \newcommand, styles and package options when I run pdflatex. However,
>> I am unable to use RefTeX between File1.tex and File2.tex. I have set the
>> %%% TeX-master: "Methods" at the bottom of File1.tex and File2.tex.
>
> "Methods"? Did you "Master"?
>
> Anyway, a few hours ago was installed in AUCTeX a new patch that
> should improve your workflow with this package. For example, this is
> my master file:
>
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{subfiles,amsmath}
> \begin{document}
> hello world!
> \begin{equation}
> \label{eq:1}
> a + b = c
> \end{equation}
> \subfile{file1.tex}
> \end{document}
>
> %%% Local Variables:
> %%% mode: latex
> %%% TeX-master: t
> %%% End:
>
>
> and this is my file1.tex file:
>
> \documentclass[master.tex]{subfiles}
>
> \begin{document}
> Equation~\eqref{eq:1}
> \end{document}
>
> %%% Local Variables:
> %%% mode: latex
> %%% TeX-master: t
> %%% End:
>
> Inside file1.tex, now I can insert with RefTeX a reference defined in
> another file (like what I did to insert the reference to "eq:1"
> label). Is this what you would like?
>
> Bye,
> Mosè
>
Hi,
How is this any advantage over simply using \include(file1}? I must be
missing something here.
Colin.
___
auctex mailing list
auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
Re: [AUCTeX] Switch off indentation
On Fri, Sep 23 2016, Colin Baxter wrote: > How do I switch off indentation for \caption and \footnote, but keep it > for everything else? > > Thanks. I solved the problem - sorry for the noise. I just switched off electric indent and revert to using C-j should I wish to indent. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
[AUCTeX] Switch off indentation
How do I switch off indentation for \caption and \footnote, but keep it for everything else? Thanks. ___ auctex mailing list auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
