Joerg Schilling <joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote, on 02 Nov 2016: > > Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chaze...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Has ksh93 ever been certified as a POSIX conformant shell? > > Actually, have any other shell than ksh88 and bash been > > certified?
As far as I'm aware all of the certified UNIX systems use either ksh88 or bash as their standard sh. > Has bash really been certified? Isn't macos certified with the > non-POSIX-compliant bash-3.x? It passes the test suite. I believe Apple use some non-default compile time options to make it conform. Perhaps they have also backported some patches from later versions. -- Geoff Clare <g.cl...@opengroup.org> The Open Group, Apex Plaza, Forbury Road, Reading, RG1 1AX, England
