Re: Automake 1.10b test release
Hi Jan, * Jan Engelhardt wrote on Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:28:00PM CEST: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall silent-rules]) does not give me silent rules, but it does not throw a warning for an unknown option either. Automake is invoked via `autoreconf -fi`. What's up with it? Ok so I was a bit too hasty here. Explicitly supplying V=0 to make 'solved' that. But I would like to have an option or some kind so that V=1 can be made default without having to pass --enable-silent-rules to configure.. (Conversely, a user can still override my choice of V=1 by always upplying --disable-silent-rules) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.bugs/4584/focus=4585 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.bugs/4584/focus=4594 Cheers, Ralf
Re: Automake 1.10b test release
On Tuesday 2009-03-31 01:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'm pleased to announce the Automake 1.10b test release. It contains a bunch of new features, and a bunch of bugfixes over previous versions, and probably a bunch of new bugs. Highlights, in no particular order: I just now tried v1.10b-48-g642786a, and I have to say, AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall silent-rules]) does not give me silent rules, but it does not throw a warning for an unknown option either. Automake is invoked via `autoreconf -fi`. What's up with it?
Re: Automake 1.10b test release
On Saturday 2009-04-25 23:19, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Tuesday 2009-03-31 01:21, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I'm pleased to announce the Automake 1.10b test release. It contains a bunch of new features, and a bunch of bugfixes over previous versions, and probably a bunch of new bugs. Highlights, in no particular order: I just now tried v1.10b-48-g642786a, and I have to say, AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall silent-rules]) does not give me silent rules, but it does not throw a warning for an unknown option either. Automake is invoked via `autoreconf -fi`. What's up with it? Ok so I was a bit too hasty here. Explicitly supplying V=0 to make 'solved' that. But I would like to have an option or some kind so that V=1 can be made default without having to pass --enable-silent-rules to configure.. (Conversely, a user can still override my choice of V=1 by always upplying --disable-silent-rules)
Re: Automake 1.10b test release
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Jan Engelhardt wrote: Ok so I was a bit too hasty here. Explicitly supplying V=0 to make 'solved' that. But I would like to have an option or some kind so that V=1 can be made default without having to pass --enable-silent-rules to configure.. (Conversely, a user can still override my choice of V=1 by always upplying --disable-silent-rules) This would result in automake-based packages behaving inconsistently. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
