Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

2011-01-20 Thread Chris Wilson
I guess I was a little
prematurehttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/01/libreoffice-now-default-office-suite-in-ubuntu-11-04/?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=feedutm_campaign=Feed:+d0od+(Omg!+Ubuntu!).
Shall
we redirect existing OOo paper cuts to
LibreOfficehttps://launchpad.net/libreoffice
?

On 16 January 2011 16:04, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:34 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
  Is it still worth accepting OOo bugs as paper cuts given the lame duck
  status of the suite at this stage?

 Most(maybe even all?) of the present remaining OOo papercuts were
 carried over from last cycle.

 Desktop team mentioned that whether we stick with OOo or switch to LibO
 for Natty is still not finalized. It depends on how fast LibO
 development progresses and how far it is ready before our feature
 freeze.
 So for now, since OOo is still in the default Natty install , it's not
 harmful to get a few of its bugs fixed. ;)

 --
 Cheers,
 Vish


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

2011-01-16 Thread Chris Wilson
Is it still worth accepting OOo bugs as paper cuts given the lame duck
status of the suite at this stage? LibreOffice is coming down the pipes fast
and will likely be released some time this year. Will bugs fixed upstream in
OOo filter down to LibreOffice eventually, or are they two separate entities
now with their own streams?
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

2011-01-16 Thread Thamawij Pirajnaraporn
Hi All,

I've cough by the title. I just wanna ask why IBM Lotus Symphony doesn't be
considered to integrate by default to Ubuntu ? I'm currently using and it
looks nice for the interface. It may lack some features in spreadsheet, such
as URL data import, but I've found it way better than OOffice. Especially,
the right handed tools, interface and icons.

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:34 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
  Is it still worth accepting OOo bugs as paper cuts given the lame duck
  status of the suite at this stage?

 Most(maybe even all?) of the present remaining OOo papercuts were
 carried over from last cycle.

 Desktop team mentioned that whether we stick with OOo or switch to LibO
 for Natty is still not finalized. It depends on how fast LibO
 development progresses and how far it is ready before our feature
 freeze.
 So for now, since OOo is still in the default Natty install , it's not
 harmful to get a few of its bugs fixed. ;)

 --
 Cheers,
 Vish


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
 Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

2011-01-16 Thread Mark Curtis

I'm going to guess it's because Lotus Symphony's license is proprietary, not 
FOSS

From: ubuntu.thama...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:11:31 +0700
To: v...@ubuntu.com
CC: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts

Hi All,
I've cough by the title. I just wanna ask why IBM Lotus Symphony doesn't be 
considered to integrate by default to Ubuntu ? I'm currently using and it looks 
nice for the interface. It may lack some features in spreadsheet, such as URL 
data import, but I've found it way better than OOffice. Especially, the right 
handed tools, interface and icons.



On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:


On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:34 +, Chris Wilson wrote:

 Is it still worth accepting OOo bugs as paper cuts given the lame duck

 status of the suite at this stage?



Most(maybe even all?) of the present remaining OOo papercuts were

carried over from last cycle.



Desktop team mentioned that whether we stick with OOo or switch to LibO

for Natty is still not finalized. It depends on how fast LibO

development progresses and how far it is ready before our feature

freeze.

So for now, since OOo is still in the default Natty install , it's not

harmful to get a few of its bugs fixed. ;)



--

Cheers,

Vish





___

Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana

Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net

Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana

More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp   
  ___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp