RE: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Kim Plowright
Heh, Second Life

Speaking of which: the list might be interested in this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcone/listings/programme.shtml?day=tuesdayservice
_id=4223FILENAME=20061205/20061205_2235_4223_3276_50 (Mn, how
broken are our listing pages? Quick, someone remind me of one of the
mashups?)

Imagine, the arts strand, is doing a piece about teh intornetz. There
are interviews with Berners Lee and Clay Shirky in there, and it's not a
bad mainstream intro to web culture. (I haven't seen the final cut yet -
feel free to point and laugh at me if I'm wrong)

In it, also, Alan Yentob visits Second Life. And starts a blog. 


Kim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clare OLeary
Sent: 28 November 2006 20:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content

Hi
Yes, actually most kids my sons age - 20 ish don't watch tv at all.
They might watch YouTube occassionally but mostly they are either
watching DVD's on their wide screen laptops, or creating their own
content with digi-cams, photoshop artwork, websites or generally out and
about listening to live music and doing their thang...
www.conduction.co.nz Sams site...

i think the most interesting group to watch is the littlies - who are
growing up with interactivity and who want to grab the mouse from when
they are 3 or 4play games, change the channel etc...

i'm writing a report at present on the nz perspective of 'tv meets you
tube'
and its pretty interesting out there - check out The Infinite Mind and
an animated live interview by John Hockenberry with Kurt Vonnegut in a
virtual studio with an interviewer and global audience...
 - parallel universe in cyberspace anyone?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2140455044291565033

o.k. hooked now...


clare
www.evebaystudio.co.nz
www.qteam.co.nz



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Cashmore
Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2006 4:21 a.m.
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon


Actually that's a really good point - hadn't thought of it that way...
We always assume that what the 'kids' to today will be the model in 10
maybe 20 years... But actually when you think about it that's not
necessarily the case... Like you when I was a teenager I spent most of
my time messing with my C64 and then later on with the NES and a few
other things - very little if any time in front of the box.

But now... 15 years later I spend a lot more time in front of the box,
but... With a laptop on my lap emailing, making sure I turn off phone
notifications in Twitter, and messing with stuff... Perhaps what we're
seeing is the end of TV as a dominant platform...

Families would sit around the wireless and listen intently, then as time
moved on Radio became a platform you listened to whilst you did
something else - passive if you like - TV has always been a sit back
technology, do nothing else just watch - now that's changing... It
doesn't mean it's dead.

m

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bowden
Sent: 28 November 2006 15:02
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon

 now since there are only so many hours in the day, it's pretty certain

 that TV's dominance in terms of time (and it's *hugely dominant, even 
 for kids) will be challenged - but yotube won't kill TV - it'll change

 it, just like TV changed radio, but radio listening is more popular 
 than ever.

What will be most interesting to me is what happens 20 years down the
line.  What happens to those kids who sit in front of their PCs and You
Tube now.

I wonder because I look at my own life.  Fifteen to twenty years ago, I
spent a lot of time in my room playing computer games on my
Spectrum/Atari ST/386.  I watched little television - and even less in
the main room.

Zoom forward to present day and I sit on my sofa with my widescreen TV
quite a bit.  I no longer have a joystick.  The PC sits upstairs - if
I'm on it, I'm checking emails, messing with stuff.

Behaviours change - situations change.  What is common to do at one
point in your life, will not always be so.


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe,
please visit
http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit

RE: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Ian Forrester
I keep meaning to draw this out and post it on my blog

--- my own thoughts on TV generations ---

1st generation - Mainstream
TV watchers, Tend to be stuck to the Broadcast Schedule, will get home to watch 
a certain thing, will see lots of adverts etc. Will tend to have Cable, Sky or 
Free view

2nd generation - Tape it for later
They tend to watch live events, browse TV and tape/vivo/record everything they 
watch a lot (such as shows). They skip adverts but still see them. Still aware 
of the Broadcast Schedule and subscribes to Sky or Cable

3rd generation - On Demand
Completely off the schedule, no idea which channel things come from or what 
time there on. Rely on friends recommendations or social networks to tell 
what's on. Owns a laptop or has a computer device (such as xbox) setup with 
there TV. Tends not to browse TV and does not subscribe to Sky or Cable but 
watches a lot of TV

4th generation - There is no spoon
Same as 3rd generation but sees all content as remixable and shareable. Can't 
understand why mixing bbc content with some dance tune is bad. Uploads content 
to online sites and shares a lot for social capital. May not even own a TV but 
has access to a large connection

Obviously there's stages between the generations, like someone who watches 
everything on demand but also tunes in for Torchwood every week (what day is it 
on again?)

:)

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Dicken
Sent: 28 November 2006 21:33
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content

 Yes, actually most kids my sons age - 20 ish don't watch tv at all. 
 They might watch YouTube occassionally but mostly they are either 
 watching DVD's on their wide screen laptops, or creating their own 
 content with digi-cams, photoshop artwork, websites or generally out 
 and about

Speaking as someone in this age-group (although possibly atypical given my tech 
background), its not that we don't watch TV, its just that TV programs aren't 
good enough to keep our interest. My flatmate makes time for Torchwood each 
week - I have a habit of forgetting its on so end up either setting our TV up 
to record it, then watch it later, or I pick it up from a torrent site. The 
whole concept of remembering when a show is on and watching it is now totally 
alien to me - I want content on demand, and youtube delivers that. Its just 
that its generally trashy content on there, and whilst you can sometimes spend 
hours watching what fun people have with... Y'know... Putting firecrackers down 
their pants or whatever Its not exactly the kind of high-brow stuff people 
want from a proper broadcasting outfit. Youtube is generally 
lowest-common-denominator content, but the trend is definitely towards not 
being told when in our busy day we're going to take time to watch somethi!
 ng when the technology to watch it when we want to is so pervasive. 
Increasingly, television as a medium is going to fall by the way-side as other 
newer mediums take over. These are predominantly going to be to some extent 
internet-driven. That doesn't mean that the programmes are going to end, but 
they are going to evolve. Ten years ago, choosing which angle you viewed a 
football match from would have seemed insane, nowadays you just have to press a 
button on your remote.
Ten years from now, who knows what will be possible, but as some level of 
abstraction, there's still going to be sound and pictures being transmitted.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


(freeing) content is king (was Re: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content)

2006-11-29 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I keep meaning to draw this out and post it on my blog

I am suprised at the level of heavy breathing going on about Grade's
departure. Clearly there is very little vision in the executive branch
of the television industry right now.

I think it's time that someone who understands the content issues from
the point of view of the future took over Auntie.

Ian, why don't you apply for the job of Chairman of the BBC?


-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: (freeing) content is king (was Re: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content)

2006-11-29 Thread Martin Belam

Ian, why don't you apply for the job of Chairman of the BBC?


I think the Chairman is more of a strategic hands-off job, and I'm
sure Ian would miss getting his hands dirty with widget code :-)





On 29/11/06, Nic James Ferrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I keep meaning to draw this out and post it on my blog

I am suprised at the level of heavy breathing going on about Grade's
departure. Clearly there is very little vision in the executive branch
of the television industry right now.

I think it's time that someone who understands the content issues from
the point of view of the future took over Auntie.

Ian, why don't you apply for the job of Chairman of the BBC?


--
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Richard P Edwards

Ian,

As a geriatric, I am pleased to be 3rd Generation, with a hint of 4th !!
I'm looking forward to real virtual reality as well, been waiting  
since 1987 although Second Life isn't up my street. but an  
interactive band on youtube is.. so my vision is very different  
from the norm.
I am happy to see it all as binary code, so there is no difference  
between anyone telling me the news, from the radio,TV,web-site, or my  
neighbour. The big difference is that now I have so much choice that  
I struggle to decide what is actually important or worth my time.


I am therefore influenced by what I feel is good, and I respect the  
BBC and it's quality. I don't know who makes what, or whether one  
show is more expensive than another, but you can be sure that my  
experience makes for very quick choices. so yes, I will record a  
great show to DVD just to get rid of the ad breaks.


Can you tell me, why is mixing BBC content with some dance tune bad?  
If I can pay for that content and people like the mashup, then I am  
not hurting anyone. sadly at this moment I am unable to license  
that content but that doesn't make it bad.. if every  
cameraman owned the footage he shot, then most programs could not be  
edited and aired, as a similar example.



I must say that I get pretty frustrated with old world legal  
problems always affecting new ways to use the content as I would  
like, in my case I can do just about all of it, but I choose to stay  
within the law. I can though, understand completely why others  
don't in these cases.
Even as far back as the 80's people were stealing loops and using  
them to make new songs. the new generations are capable of  
borrowing from all digital sources, and sometimes they actually  
win. Youtube is perhaps a case in point, where once again the  
writs will fly after the event. Just like Google's project to copy  
books. the idea has no negatives, but the how it is paid for is  
unknown or just way too complicated and expensive to do.




What a great time to be around to use it all, given legal  
access.



On 29 Nov 2006, at 10:56, Ian Forrester wrote:


I keep meaning to draw this out and post it on my blog

--- my own thoughts on TV generations ---

1st generation - Mainstream
TV watchers, Tend to be stuck to the Broadcast Schedule, will get  
home to watch a certain thing, will see lots of adverts etc. Will  
tend to have Cable, Sky or Free view


2nd generation - Tape it for later
They tend to watch live events, browse TV and tape/vivo/record  
everything they watch a lot (such as shows). They skip adverts but  
still see them. Still aware of the Broadcast Schedule and  
subscribes to Sky or Cable


3rd generation - On Demand
Completely off the schedule, no idea which channel things come from  
or what time there on. Rely on friends recommendations or social  
networks to tell what's on. Owns a laptop or has a computer device  
(such as xbox) setup with there TV. Tends not to browse TV and does  
not subscribe to Sky or Cable but watches a lot of TV


4th generation - There is no spoon
Same as 3rd generation but sees all content as remixable and  
shareable. Can't understand why mixing bbc content with some dance  
tune is bad. Uploads content to online sites and shares a lot for  
social capital. May not even own a TV but has access to a large  
connection


Obviously there's stages between the generations, like someone who  
watches everything on demand but also tunes in for Torchwood every  
week (what day is it on again?)


:)

Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Dicken

Sent: 28 November 2006 21:33
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content


Yes, actually most kids my sons age - 20 ish don't watch tv at all.
They might watch YouTube occassionally but mostly they are either
watching DVD's on their wide screen laptops, or creating their own
content with digi-cams, photoshop artwork, websites or generally out
and about


Speaking as someone in this age-group (although possibly atypical  
given my tech background), its not that we don't watch TV, its just  
that TV programs aren't good enough to keep our interest. My  
flatmate makes time for Torchwood each week - I have a habit of  
forgetting its on so end up either setting our TV up to record it,  
then watch it later, or I pick it up from a torrent site. The whole  
concept of remembering when a show is on and watching it is now  
totally alien to me - I want content on demand, and youtube  
delivers that. Its just that its generally trashy content on there,  
and whilst you can sometimes spend hours watching what fun people  
have with... Y'know... Putting firecrackers down their pants or  
whatever Its not exactly the kind of high-brow stuff people  
want from a proper broadcasting outfit

RE: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Ian Forrester
 


Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard P Edwards
Sent: 29 November 2006 16:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content

Ian,

As a geriatric, I am pleased to be 3rd Generation, with a hint of 4th !!

Don't worry, I'm edging on to the 4th generation too.

I am happy to see it all as binary code, so there is no difference between 
anyone telling me the news, from the radio,TV,web-site, or my neighbour. The 
big difference is that now I have so much choice that I struggle to decide what 
is actually important or worth my time.

Yeah that's why I really need to draw this up as a real graph or diagram. One 
of the things I missed out as you move across the generations (need to think of 
a better name that this) decision theory (paradox of choice) becomes more of a 
problem.
Currently I'm watching half mainstream media and half small time producers like 
videocasts and youtube. Which way I go when I sit down in front of the TV in 
the evening is really dependant on the media (I really should do a videocast 
about my viewing habits)


Can you tell me, why is mixing BBC content with some dance tune bad?

I wasn't suggesting it was bad, just that you can imagine if your sitting in 
generation 1, this whole remixing thing might seem alien. Specially when its 
your content.

My parents just got broadband, they were commenting to me one day that they 
looked at my blog and couldn't understand why I was giving away my video I 
shot. I tried to explain but it was very hard work.


I must say that I get pretty frustrated with old world legal problems always 
affecting new ways to use the content as I would like, in my case I can do just 
about all of it, but I choose to stay within the law. I can though, 
understand completely why others don't in these cases.

Stay within the law :)
But yes this is nothing unique to the just digital media. Some suggest the law 
is badly out of step with the technology. I wouldn't say its not so simple as 
that, but I take the point.

Even as far back as the 80's people were stealing loops and using them to make 
new songs.

Yes and a lot of companies (cable) and cultures (hiphop) were started and 
continue to profit from there shaky roots.

The question is what do we do now about it? Moan or get together and get 
something done? :)

Ian


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Frank Wales

Ian Forrester wrote:

I keep meaning to draw this out and post it on my blog


Aw, fuff.  I'm too busy writing individual, pithy-oid
quips on mailing lists to post things in my blog.

(Hold on, I think I'm having an epiphany...nope, just gas.)


--- my own thoughts on TV generations ---


Maybe I'm in the pi-th generation:

I hear about a really cool programme, such as 'Itchy and Scratchy
meet the Fairly Odd Parents -- on ice!', which was so subversive
they'll *never* be allowed to show it again.  Unfortunately, just
like all the other things I should have seen to be a credible member
of modern parlor-room society, it was on yesterday.  And I
once again wish for a simple Show me yesterday's TV that I didn't
know about until today gadget that doesn't cost one of these
(holds up an arm and a leg), doesn't risk having one of these felt
(tugs at collar), and doesn't involve me having to build one of those
(points at networked multi-channel, multi-day video cacheing system).

Which I could build, obviously, if it weren't for all the, you know, quips.

Obviously there's stages between the generations, like someone who 

 watches everything on demand but also tunes in for Torchwood every week
 (what day is it on again?)

All of them.
--
Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


Re: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Richard Lockwood

I hear about a really cool programme, such as 'Itchy and Scratchy
meet the Fairly Odd Parents -- on ice!', which was so subversive
they'll *never* be allowed to show it again.


Just you wait until my until-now secret project; 100 Greatest
Asbestos Removal Disasters gets aired...

Oh - and if anyone would like to appear on my
reality-show-in-development, Hurl Spears At Shane Ritchie*, drop me
a line.

Cheers,

Rich.

* If Mr Ritchie is unavailable, this may have to be retitled Kick
Bradley Walsh Into A Vegetative State
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-29 Thread Clare OLeary
Hi
In the spirit of 'play', check out Stray Cinema,which is a short film shot
in London by a kiwi,
then uploaded to the web - you can download it and remix it and add 20% of
your
own original content - its kind of an experiment and all based on the
Creative Commons licence
as well as in the spirit of collaborative content sharing just to see what
happens.
check it out at www.straycinema.com
and www.creativecommons.org of course...

clare
www.evebaystudio.co.nz


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard P Edwards
Sent: Thursday, 30 November 2006 5:30 a.m.
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content


Ian,

As a geriatric, I am pleased to be 3rd Generation, with a hint of 4th !!
I'm looking forward to real virtual reality as well, been waiting
since 1987 although Second Life isn't up my street. but an
interactive band on youtube is.. so my vision is very different
from the norm.
I am happy to see it all as binary code, so there is no difference
between anyone telling me the news, from the radio,TV,web-site, or my
neighbour. The big difference is that now I have so much choice that
I struggle to decide what is actually important or worth my time.

I am therefore influenced by what I feel is good, and I respect the
BBC and it's quality. I don't know who makes what, or whether one
show is more expensive than another, but you can be sure that my
experience makes for very quick choices. so yes, I will record a
great show to DVD just to get rid of the ad breaks.

Can you tell me, why is mixing BBC content with some dance tune bad?
If I can pay for that content and people like the mashup, then I am
not hurting anyone. sadly at this moment I am unable to license
that content but that doesn't make it bad.. if every
cameraman owned the footage he shot, then most programs could not be
edited and aired, as a similar example.


I must say that I get pretty frustrated with old world legal
problems always affecting new ways to use the content as I would
like, in my case I can do just about all of it, but I choose to stay
within the law. I can though, understand completely why others
don't in these cases.
Even as far back as the 80's people were stealing loops and using
them to make new songs. the new generations are capable of
borrowing from all digital sources, and sometimes they actually
win. Youtube is perhaps a case in point, where once again the
writs will fly after the event. Just like Google's project to copy
books. the idea has no negatives, but the how it is paid for is
unknown or just way too complicated and expensive to do.



What a great time to be around to use it all, given legal
access.


On 29 Nov 2006, at 10:56, Ian Forrester wrote:

 I keep meaning to draw this out and post it on my blog

 --- my own thoughts on TV generations ---

 1st generation - Mainstream
 TV watchers, Tend to be stuck to the Broadcast Schedule, will get
 home to watch a certain thing, will see lots of adverts etc. Will
 tend to have Cable, Sky or Free view

 2nd generation - Tape it for later
 They tend to watch live events, browse TV and tape/vivo/record
 everything they watch a lot (such as shows). They skip adverts but
 still see them. Still aware of the Broadcast Schedule and
 subscribes to Sky or Cable

 3rd generation - On Demand
 Completely off the schedule, no idea which channel things come from
 or what time there on. Rely on friends recommendations or social
 networks to tell what's on. Owns a laptop or has a computer device
 (such as xbox) setup with there TV. Tends not to browse TV and does
 not subscribe to Sky or Cable but watches a lot of TV

 4th generation - There is no spoon
 Same as 3rd generation but sees all content as remixable and
 shareable. Can't understand why mixing bbc content with some dance
 tune is bad. Uploads content to online sites and shares a lot for
 social capital. May not even own a TV but has access to a large
 connection

 Obviously there's stages between the generations, like someone who
 watches everything on demand but also tunes in for Torchwood every
 week (what day is it on again?)

 :)

 Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Dicken
 Sent: 28 November 2006 21:33
 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
 Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content

 Yes, actually most kids my sons age - 20 ish don't watch tv at all.
 They might watch YouTube occassionally but mostly they are either
 watching DVD's on their wide screen laptops, or creating their own
 content with digi-cams, photoshop artwork, websites or generally out
 and about

 Speaking as someone in this age-group (although possibly atypical
 given my tech background), its not that we don't watch TV, its just
 that TV programs aren't good enough to keep our interest. My
 flatmate

RE: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-28 Thread Luke Dicken
 Yes, actually most kids my sons age - 20 ish don't watch tv 
 at all. They might watch YouTube occassionally but mostly 
 they are either watching DVD's on their wide screen laptops, 
 or creating their own content with digi-cams, photoshop 
 artwork, websites or generally out and about

Speaking as someone in this age-group (although possibly atypical given
my tech background), its not that we don't watch TV, its just that TV
programs aren't good enough to keep our interest. My flatmate makes time
for Torchwood each week - I have a habit of forgetting its on so end up
either setting our TV up to record it, then watch it later, or I pick it
up from a torrent site. The whole concept of remembering when a show is
on and watching it is now totally alien to me - I want content on
demand, and youtube delivers that. Its just that its generally trashy
content on there, and whilst you can sometimes spend hours watching what
fun people have with... Y'know... Putting firecrackers down their pants
or whatever Its not exactly the kind of high-brow stuff people want
from a proper broadcasting outfit. Youtube is generally
lowest-common-denominator content, but the trend is definitely towards
not being told when in our busy day we're going to take time to watch
something when the technology to watch it when we want to is so
pervasive. Increasingly, television as a medium is going to fall by the
way-side as other newer mediums take over. These are predominantly going
to be to some extent internet-driven. That doesn't mean that the
programmes are going to end, but they are going to evolve. Ten years
ago, choosing which angle you viewed a football match from would have
seemed insane, nowadays you just have to press a button on your remote.
Ten years from now, who knows what will be possible, but as some level
of abstraction, there's still going to be sound and pictures being
transmitted.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/


RE: [backstage] Psiphon Next Gen content

2006-11-28 Thread Clare OLeary
Hi Luke

Yes - scheduling of prime time is what is dying as you can on TIVO (or
whatever) record, download, watch it when you want etc.
I'm interested in what that will mean for content creators in terms of how
to alert people to the fact that something is actually worth recording and
watchign later, so, as advertisers scramble to leap into the new interactive
world i think it will be your generation which dictates what that world will
become...but as a doco maker and content creator, i'm keen to keep making
stuff, thats for sure!

clare
www.evebaystudio.co.nz

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Luke Dicken
Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2006 10:33 a.m.
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Psiphon  Next Gen content


 Yes, actually most kids my sons age - 20 ish don't watch tv
 at all. They might watch YouTube occassionally but mostly
 they are either watching DVD's on their wide screen laptops,
 or creating their own content with digi-cams, photoshop
 artwork, websites or generally out and about

Speaking as someone in this age-group (although possibly atypical given
my tech background), its not that we don't watch TV, its just that TV
programs aren't good enough to keep our interest. My flatmate makes time
for Torchwood each week - I have a habit of forgetting its on so end up
either setting our TV up to record it, then watch it later, or I pick it
up from a torrent site. The whole concept of remembering when a show is
on and watching it is now totally alien to me - I want content on
demand, and youtube delivers that. Its just that its generally trashy
content on there, and whilst you can sometimes spend hours watching what
fun people have with... Y'know... Putting firecrackers down their pants
or whatever Its not exactly the kind of high-brow stuff people want
from a proper broadcasting outfit. Youtube is generally
lowest-common-denominator content, but the trend is definitely towards
not being told when in our busy day we're going to take time to watch
something when the technology to watch it when we want to is so
pervasive. Increasingly, television as a medium is going to fall by the
way-side as other newer mediums take over. These are predominantly going
to be to some extent internet-driven. That doesn't mean that the
programmes are going to end, but they are going to evolve. Ten years
ago, choosing which angle you viewed a football match from would have
seemed insane, nowadays you just have to press a button on your remote.
Ten years from now, who knows what will be possible, but as some level
of abstraction, there's still going to be sound and pictures being
transmitted.

-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/



-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/