Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with my eject tape job
Hi! Try it using Type = Admin in the Eject-LTO-Tape instead of Type = Backup. Thank you! You made my day! Type = Admin did it! :) Thorsten -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 euro;/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] TLS and PKI, How to limit de encryption overhead ?
I already use Data encryption because I want the content of my Tape to be encrypted. The aspect that's boring me in communication is that authentication / commands / console access is sent clearly over the network. I am not sure of what security level the File Daemon encryption only can provide. I know that meta data aren't encrypted. Do you have advice for that kind of stuff ? For the moment I use SSH but in a final configuration I might use remote laptop computers with non static ip configuration ( change ip via console access ...) Thanks. Hugo 2010/11/18 Radosław Korzeniewski rados...@korzeniewski.net: 2010/11/18 Thomas Mueller tho...@chaschperli.ch On 18.11.2010 02:01, Dan Langille wrote: IMHO TLS is only used for the control-channel not for the data- channel. Really? I hope not. Can you prove this? ok maybe you're right. i've had in mind that it was not encrypted, but written is that the volumes written by sd are not encrypted. not the data transfer between fd and sd. The data written to Volumes by the Storage daemon is not encrypted by this code. http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Bacula_TLS_Communications.html Data encription is performed by FD: http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Data_Encryption.html Radek -- Radosław Korzeniewski rados...@korzeniewski.net -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
Hi, There is a big difference in the size of individual jobs, they range from maybe 30Gb to 300Gb. No individual job would be multi terabyte. The number of clients combined would be over 1 TB for a given day, rather than an individual job. I used 5Gb as it was a suggested size in the bacula documentation. Dermot. On 11/17/10 19:16, Dermot Beirne wrote: Hi Phil, I have set a size limit of 5Gb on each volume. My daily incrementals are using over 300 such volumes at the moment, so 200 will be nowhere near enough to do a full backup of all the clients at year end, so I'll be increasing that before then. Ah, I didn't realize you were using so many volumes per job. If you're running multi-terabyte backup jobs, aren't 5GB volumes a bit small? -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
Hello Blake, Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 00:30:16, Blake Dunlap a écrit : Basicly what I see here is that you really want a migration, not a copy job. This coupled with the patch from http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04724.html should do what you want if you set the new option in the migration job (from the patch, believe it is Migrate Purge Jobs = yes, as I said, it's been a while). Sorry, we missed your excelent idea, and I think that we can add it very quickly, with one minor modification about the directive name (more something like PurgeMigrateJob or PurgeMigrationJob. If you want to help getting documentation (new feature section and Job resource directive) and regression testing on your feature, it would be great. Bye -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
On 11/18/10 05:56, Dermot Beirne wrote: Hi, There is a big difference in the size of individual jobs, they range from maybe 30Gb to 300Gb. No individual job would be multi terabyte. The number of clients combined would be over 1 TB for a given day, rather than an individual job. I used 5Gb as it was a suggested size in the bacula documentation. 5GB is a good starting size for fixed-size volumes for a small installation, but one size need not fit all. It's undoubtedly not an appropriate choice for a site with a backup volume measured in terabytes per day. With that kind of volume of data to back up and that much evident disk space available to do it with, if I wanted to limit volume sizes I think I might set my volume size limit at 100GB, or even larger. In actual fact, although my total full-backup set is under a terabyte, I don't actually limit the size of my disk volumes at all; I instead use Volume Write Duration to limit any given volume to hold only a single day's jobs. Remember that none of the examples in the documentation is set in stone. Use them as a starting point, sure, but apply logic and decide what's reasonable in your case. Any volume size limit that forces you to allocate several hundred volumes for a single day of incremental backups is probably not appropriate for *your* installation, and may be costing you significant time in sheer overhead. If you're getting any kind of sane transfer rate at all for a dataset of that size, Bacula must be having to create new volumes and switch volumes every few seconds. -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] what does baculas select-query for mysql look like?
Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:30:33 +0100, C Keschnat said: I'm having problems with long running select statements (bacula 5.0.2). After activating mysql-slow-logs, I saw logs similar to # Time: 101117 11:32:56 # u...@host: bacula[bacula] @ localhost [] # Query_time: 2793 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 127104387 Rows_examined: 127104387 use bacula; SELECT /*!40001 SQL_NO_CACHE */ * FROM `File`; I wanted to test some suggestions I read in bug reports and for that I copied the bacula server to play with it. I tried running date echo 'SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE * FROM `File`;' | mysql -uroot -p bacula /dev/null date but the process gets killed with Out of memory: kill process 16377 (mysql)... after some time. Can anyone tell me how bacula queries the database? It makes many different queries, but I doubt that is makes that one. It doesn't look like anything it needs to do. __Martin You will need to submit the query exactly as written anyway, which you haven't done. SELECT /*!40001 SQL_NO_CACHE */ * FROM `File`; SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE * FROM `File`; Note the /*!40001 and the */ in the original code, which is omitted in the second version? With my experience of Oracle, that looks like an execution hint, in other words a directive to help the database choose the most efficient way of retrieveing the data. It's a specially formed comment, hence the /* ... */, so you either need to include the entire comment, or omit it entirely, but you have included the SQL_NO_CACHE part, and omitted the rest, which is probably causing some weird error in the database. -- Mike Holden http://www.by-ang.com - the place to shop for all manner of hand crafted items, including Jewellery, Greetings Cards and Gifts -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning
Maybe this can help you: http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/utility/utility/Volume_Utility_Tools.html#SECTION00274000 copy/paste *An interesting aspect of restoring a catalog backup using bscan is that the backup was made while Bacula was running and writing to a tape. At the point the backup of the catalog is made, the tape Bacula is writing to will have say 10 files on it, but after the catalog backup is made, there will be 11 files on the tape Bacula is writing. This there is a difference between what is contained in the backed up catalog and what is actually on the tape. If after restoring a catalog, you attempt to write on the same tape that was used to backup the catalog, Bacula will detect the difference in the number of files registered in the catalog compared to what is on the tape, and will mark the tape in error. * Kleber 2010/11/17 Craig Miskell craig.misk...@opus.co.nz -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's file records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to get the records back into the database. The operator then tried to run a restore, but had managed to leave the tape drive in an inconsistent state (unmounted, with the tape in it, so mtx had a hernia), and the Restore job failed. That's unfortunate, but it happens, and isn't the real problem. When the job failed and finished, the File Retention period kicked in, and the bscan'd records were purged. This is somewhat annoying, and means we have to bscan again (4 hours+). In the general case of a bscan and a single successful restore, it's pretty much ok. But in case of a failure of the restore, or if we find we have to do more than one restore (the user decides they need more files after the first batch), this is a real pain. The somewhat crude approach is to raise File Retention on the client to a big enough period to cover back to when the tape was written, while going through the bscan/restore process, and setting it back to normal afterwards. Is there a better way? I'm thinking of something like marking the job as not-pruneable after the bscan and while doing restores, but I'm open to any suggestions. Thanks, - -- Craig Miskell Senior Systems Administrator Opus International Consultants Phone: +64 4 471 7209 I think we agree, the past is over - -George W Bush -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzkUQkACgkQmDveRtxWqna+BwCgmIKDzOVuuqLoNqe4Gzu12Ky9 ptIAn3R/CfmMMBe+L2m3V+DuY1vrk2p0 =wdLG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
Hi, You make a good point. I stuck with the 5Gb as keeping small volumes aids restore times and reduces possibility of corruption affecting a large part of the backups in the event of a disk fault, as indicated in the documentation, which, as you say, may not be appropriate for my setup any more, particularly as these disk volumes will only survive a day, so be rarely used for restores. I do see bacula switching and recycling volumes very often, and I also intend to examine my tape write speeds, as the copy jobs take a long time. I presume writing a few large files to tape is more efficient than a large number of small files. I think I'll reconsider this volume size and test some variations. Incidently, do you use verification in your setup. Is this another set of jobs that need to be scheduled somewhere between the backup jobs and the copy jobs? I don't have much of a window for doing this. I don't want to go off topic for this thread, but thought I'd ask you while I'm typing. I'll start a new thread if I need to pursue that any further. Dermot. On 11/18/10 05:56, Dermot Beirne wrote: Hi, There is a big difference in the size of individual jobs, they range from maybe 30Gb to 300Gb. No individual job would be multi terabyte. The number of clients combined would be over 1 TB for a given day, rather than an individual job. I used 5Gb as it was a suggested size in the bacula documentation. 5GB is a good starting size for fixed-size volumes for a small installation, but one size need not fit all. It's undoubtedly not an appropriate choice for a site with a backup volume measured in terabytes per day. With that kind of volume of data to back up and that much evident disk space available to do it with, if I wanted to limit volume sizes I think I might set my volume size limit at 100GB, or even larger. In actual fact, although my total full-backup set is under a terabyte, I don't actually limit the size of my disk volumes at all; I instead use Volume Write Duration to limit any given volume to hold only a single day's jobs. Remember that none of the examples in the documentation is set in stone. Use them as a starting point, sure, but apply logic and decide what's reasonable in your case. Any volume size limit that forces you to allocate several hundred volumes for a single day of incremental backups is probably not appropriate for *your* installation, and may be costing you significant time in sheer overhead. If you're getting any kind of sane transfer rate at all for a dataset of that size, Bacula must be having to create new volumes and switch volumes every few seconds. -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:41:06 +, Dermot Beirne said: Hi Martin, I read that, and understand it doesn't run automatically, but must be called from a runscript, or whatever. However, my understanding is that the volumes need to be marked as purged before this feature will truncate them? It does not purge them, but truncates any which have a status of purged when it's run. I need something else to purge them first, and then run this to truncate them. As far as I can see, the only time a volume will be marked as purged (apart from manually doing it) is when Bacula decides to recycle it, in which case it will be truncated anyway before being rewritten. Am I missing the point of this feature completely? You'll have to use purge (without actiononpurge=trucate) to manually purge the volumes beforehand. __Martin Dermot The documation explains how to use it the actiononpurge=trucate feature: http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/New_Features_in_5_0_1.html#SECTION0041 It isn't intended to be automatic. __Martin -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:02:49 +1300, Craig Miskell said: So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's file records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to get the records back into the database. The operator then tried to run a restore, but had managed to leave the tape drive in an inconsistent state (unmounted, with the tape in it, so mtx had a hernia), and the Restore job failed. That's unfortunate, but it happens, and isn't the real problem. When the job failed and finished, the File Retention period kicked in, and the bscan'd records were purged. This is somewhat annoying, and means we have to bscan again (4 hours+). In the general case of a bscan and a single successful restore, it's pretty much ok. But in case of a failure of the restore, or if we find we have to do more than one restore (the user decides they need more files after the first batch), this is a real pain. The somewhat crude approach is to raise File Retention on the client to a big enough period to cover back to when the tape was written, while going through the bscan/restore process, and setting it back to normal afterwards. Is there a better way? I'm thinking of something like marking the job as not-pruneable after the bscan and while doing restores, but I'm open to any suggestions. I assume you have AutoPrune=Yes in the client definitions (it is the default)? If so, try changing it to AutoPrune=No. You can either do that temporarily (instead of raising the File Retention) or you can do it permanently and also add Prune Files = Yes and Prune Jobs = Yes in the backup job definitions. Since the Restore job definition will not have these directives, it won't trigger any pruning. The only problem with the latter approach is that pruning will still occur if a backup runs before you have finished the restore. __Martin -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Restore problem
I have one particular restore which only brings back ~11,500 files out of 980,000 on a full backup. Using Bextract and attempting to restore the job that way gives the same result. There are no errors except that the job was expecting a lot more files than actually came back. The odd thing is that stracing and debugging shows that the blocks on the tape are being read fine, as are the files on it, but they're simply not being extracted to disk. Subsequent and previous full backups for the same job work fine. Backups and restores attempted on 64-bit linux, using Bacula 5.0.3 Has anyone else seen this behaviour? -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Bacula Media Rotation
Hi Guys, Still having issues with Bacula :( Basically the media rotation isn't working. Here is an example of my pool definition: - Pool#123; nbsp; Name = MondayPool nbsp; PoolType = Backup nbsp; Recycle = yes nbsp; Autoprune = yes nbsp; VolumeRetention = 13 days nbsp; VolumeUseDuration = 23 hours nbsp; LabelFormat = nbsp; MaximumVolumes = 2 nbsp; RecycleOldestVolume = yes #125; What is happening is that Monday0001 is used during week 1 and Monday0002 is used during week 2, now week3 Bacula is asking for Monday0002 and not Monday0001 as I think it should. I understand that Bacula will use any media in a pool that is flagged append. So I guess what I need to know how to do is when Monday0001 is used, it keeps it for at least 7 days and after Monday0002 is used (kept for 7 days), Monday0001 is flagged as writable and so on. Would setting RecycleCurrentVolume = yes be better than RecycleOldestVolume = yes? Cheers Emyr +-- |This was sent by tech-t...@telem.co.uk via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] TLS and PKI, How to limit de encryption overhead ?
On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:19 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: On 18.11.2010 02:01, Dan Langille wrote: IMHO TLS is only used for the control-channel not for the data- channel. Really? I hope not. Can you prove this? ok maybe you're right. i've had in mind that it was not encrypted, but written is that the volumes written by sd are not encrypted. not the data transfer between fd and sd. The TLS implementation supports encryption of all network communications between all daemons. The data written to Volumes by the Storage daemon is not encrypted by this code. http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Bacula_TLS_Communications.html Right -- this caveat is intended to explain that despite the network communications being encrypted, the data actually written to the volume is not encrypted -- ie, anyone with physical access to the disk or tape can still read its contents, but the data can not be read off the wire by someone with a network sniffer. The data (but not meta-data) written to disk can be encrypted by the File Daemon, but that is separate from the TLS support. Storage encryption in the Storage Daemon is not currently supported (something we've discussed on the list in the past). -landonf -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs waiting on Storage / Volume pool not assigned
If there's any more information I can provide to allow someone to assist
in resolving this, please let me know.
It really seems as though on some long running multi-volume jobs that
additional volumes aren't getting their pool assigned until after the
job finishes, and that this is preventing other jobs from running
concurrently.
Thanks, any help would be great.
Chris
On 11/16/10 4:11 PM, Christopher Strider Cook wrote:
I have what is otherwise a very large and successful Bacula installation
that has been up and running for years.
Currently running from Debian lenny-backports version 5.0.2-1~bpo50+.
The issue I'm currently running into is that jobs are stuck:
--stat dir
28010 Fullray.2010-11-13_20.25.01_31 is running
28022 Differe waters.2010-11-13_20.25.01_43 is waiting on Storage Paul02
28024 Differe zebda.2010-11-13_20.25.01_45 is waiting on Storage Paul02
28026 Differe latifah.2010-11-13_20.25.01_47 is waiting on Storage Paul02
28028 Differe betadb0.2010-11-13_20.25.02_49 is waiting on Storage Paul02
28057 Fullmaybelle-P4.2010-11-14_03.15.00_22 is waiting on Storage
Paul02
28202 Increme blondie.2010-11-15_20.25.00_04 is waiting on max
Storage jobs
28208 Increme costello.2010-11-15_20.25.01_10 is waiting on max
Storage jobs
28212 Increme django.2010-11-15_20.25.01_14 is waiting on max Storage
jobs
28214 Increme electro.2010-11-15_20.25.02_16 is waiting on max
Storage jobs
--Storage Status
3608 JobId=28022 wants Pool=Paul02 but have Pool= nreserve=0 on
drive Paul02 (/archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02).
3608 JobId=28024 wants Pool=Paul02 but have Pool= nreserve=0 on
drive Paul02 (/archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02).
3608 JobId=28026 wants Pool=Paul02 but have Pool= nreserve=0 on
drive Paul02 (/archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02).
3608 JobId=28028 wants Pool=Paul02 but have Pool= nreserve=0 on
drive Paul02 (/archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02).
3608 JobId=28057 wants Pool=Paul02 but have Pool= nreserve=0 on
drive Paul02 (/archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02).
--
Device Paul02 (/archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02) is mounted with:
Volume: Paul02-9267
Pool:*unknown*
Media type: File50
Total Bytes=19,733,575,217 Blocks=305,890 Bytes/block=64,511
Positioned at File=4 Block=2,553,706,032
--
When they should be running concurrently. All these jobs have the same
storage and pool specified and max concurrent jobs is set properly for
storage and pools. I know this because normally it all works fine. The
hold ups tend to happen on long running large datasets where multiple
volumes (File based storage) are created.
Storage {
Name = Paul02
Address = deimos.savagebeast.com
SDPORT = 9103
Password = x
Device = Paul02
Media Type = File50
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 6
}
Pool {
Name = Paul02
Storage = Paul02
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = no
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 37 days
Use Volume Once = no
Maximum Volume Bytes = 25 GB
Label Format = Paul02-
Action On Purge = Truncate
Next Pool = Copy02
}
bacula.sd --
Storage { # definition of myself
Name = deimos-sd
SDPort = 9103 # Director's port
WorkingDirectory = /var/lib/bacula
Pid Directory = /var/run/bacula
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20
}
Director {
Name = tavern-dir
Password = x
}
Device {
Name = Paul02
Device Type = File
Media Type = File50
Archive Device = /archive/PAUL-nufa/Paul02
Random Access = yes
Label Media = yes
Requires Mount = no
Removable Media = no
Always Open = yes
}
---
The only thing I have noted is that the storage status lists the volume
pool as *unknown*, which I understand the storage daemon to believe
before the director tells it to write a job, but as you can see the
volume is actively being written to by the running job. Are the jobs
'waiting on Storage' waiting because they don't see a volume with the
correct pool mounted? Why isn't the pool assigned properly? When the
volume fills and it moves onto the next the pool is set properly.
Have I missed a step in the configuration or is this some sort of bug?
Thanks
Chris
-- other configs
Client {
Name = ray
Address = ray.savagebeast.com
FDPORT = 9102
Catalog = MyCatalog
Password = x
File Retention = 30 days
Job Retention = 37 days
AutoPrune = yes
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 4
}
Job {
Name = ray
Client = ray
JobDefs = PandoraClient
Pool = Paul02
Schedule = PandoraCycle1
FileSet = General-host
}
Client {
Name = waters
Address = waters.savagebeast.com
FDPORT = 9102
Catalog = MyCatalog
Password = x
File Retention = 30 days
Job Retention = 37 days
AutoPrune = yes
Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 4
}
Job {
Name = waters
Client = waters
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
Hello Blake, Basicly what I see here is that you really want a migration, not a copy job. This coupled with the patch from bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04724.html target=_newhttp://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04724.html should do what you want if you set the new option in the migration job (from the patch, believe it is Migrate Purge Jobs = yes, as I said, it's been a while). Sorry, we missed your excelent idea, and I think that we can add it very quickly, with one minor modification about the directive name (more something like PurgeMigrateJob or PurgeMigrationJob. If you want to help getting documentation (new feature section and Job resource directive) and regression testing on your feature, it would be great. Bye This is great news! Dermot -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge
If you say so, I guess it will be nice to have one less patch to manually merge. Personally, I'd rather see them add VirtualDiffs, VirtualFullCopys, fix the Pool based expiration (really really really want that), have the option to automatically purge expired volumes instead of only keeping data as long as possible so i can stop having to script it, provide better logic for restores from multiple logical sites like offsite tapes or slow link datacenters, block based dedup, a more inteligent file based store because they arent tapes, etc etc =) -Blake On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:05, Dermot Beirne dermot.bei...@dpd.ie wrote: Hello Blake, Basicly what I see here is that you really want a migration, not a copy job. This coupled with the patch from bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04724.html target=_new http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04724.html should do what you want if you set the new option in the migration job (from the patch, believe it is Migrate Purge Jobs = yes, as I said, it's been a while). Sorry, we missed your excelent idea, and I think that we can add it very quickly, with one minor modification about the directive name (more something like PurgeMigrateJob or PurgeMigrationJob. If you want to help getting documentation (new feature section and Job resource directive) and regression testing on your feature, it would be great. Bye This is great news! Dermot -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kleber Leal wrote: Maybe this can help you: http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/utility/utility/Volume_Utility_Tools.html#SECTION00274000 copy/paste /An interesting aspect of restoring a catalog backup using *bscan* is that the backup was made while Bacula was running and writing to a tape. At the point the backup of the catalog is made, the tape Bacula is writing to will have say 10 files on it, but after the catalog backup is made, there will be 11 files on the tape Bacula is writing. This there is a difference between what is contained in the backed up catalog and what is actually on the tape. If after restoring a catalog, you attempt to write on the same tape that was used to backup the catalog, Bacula will detect the difference in the number of files registered in the catalog compared to what is on the tape, and will mark the tape in error. I guess you meant to paste the After bscan section, which recommends making the volume Read Only after bscanning. An excellent suggestion, and I should have seen that when reading the docs. Thanks for pointing it out. - -- Craig Miskell Senior Systems Administrator Opus International Consultants Phone: +64 4 471 7209 BUT XML IS NOT A SUBSITUTE FOR A *** DATABASE! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzlk5MACgkQmDveRtxWqnZdHQCfSlky+DfnHcXgb0xDlTD28Gj2 fXkAnA46ed2gnFNH/ZXMYxXysAgEgsxu =s4TH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Simmons wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:02:49 +1300, Craig Miskell said: So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's file records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to get the records back into the database. The operator then tried to run a restore, but had managed to leave the tape drive in an inconsistent state (unmounted, with the tape in it, so mtx had a hernia), and the Restore job failed. That's unfortunate, but it happens, and isn't the real problem. When the job failed and finished, the File Retention period kicked in, and the bscan'd records were purged. This is somewhat annoying, and means we have to bscan again (4 hours+). In the general case of a bscan and a single successful restore, it's pretty much ok. But in case of a failure of the restore, or if we find we have to do more than one restore (the user decides they need more files after the first batch), this is a real pain. The somewhat crude approach is to raise File Retention on the client to a big enough period to cover back to when the tape was written, while going through the bscan/restore process, and setting it back to normal afterwards. Is there a better way? I'm thinking of something like marking the job as not-pruneable after the bscan and while doing restores, but I'm open to any suggestions. I assume you have AutoPrune=Yes in the client definitions (it is the default)? If so, try changing it to AutoPrune=No. You can either do that temporarily (instead of raising the File Retention) or you can do it permanently and also add Prune Files = Yes and Prune Jobs = Yes in the backup job definitions. Since the Restore job definition will not have these directives, it won't trigger any pruning. The only problem with the latter approach is that pruning will still occur if a backup runs before you have finished the restore. Thanks for both suggestions; the first is a nice clean option, although someone else suggested making the bscan'd volume Read Only, which is even less intrusive (affects just that volume). But thanks anyway; it's helpful to know the various options. Craig -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzllAUACgkQmDveRtxWqnYOHgCfSZP6oTFfQHZEpdqnICfms5ub j84AnR4LDnobtagoqqeJxsqtjIUptuI3 =igQE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Slow LTO4 write speed
1) Make sure all the firmwares are up to date: the 1068E card, the tape drives, specifically. While you're at it, make sure the Adaptec card has up to date firmware too. 2) You might want to try this other setting too... Maximum File Size = 3GB 3) Looking at your output, you only got a bit over 500GB. Are you testing with an LTO-3 tape? (max uncompressed size of those is only 400GB, whereas LTO-4 tapes fit 800GB uncompressed so you should have gotten much more on the tape before it thought it hit the end) If so, my understanding is that the tape drive will operate backward compatibly, including lowering the max read and write speeds to the previous generation's. 4) Also, writing to the tape is very CPU intensive. Is the system busy doing something else? Just a few shots in the dark there, hopefully one of them helps. In addition, until you get everything working, you should probably not mess with the default network buffer size. The manual has this to say about that setting: Maximum Network Buffer Size = bytes where bytes specifies the initial network buffer size to use with the File daemon. This size will be adjusted down if it is too large until it is accepted by the OS. Please use care in setting this value since if it is too large, it will be trimmed by 512 bytes until the OS is happy, which may require a large number of system calls. The default value is 32,768 bytes. The default size was chosen to be relatively large but not too big in the case that you are transmitting data over Internet. It is clear that on a high speed local network, you can increase this number and improve performance. For example, some users have found that if you use a value of 65,536 bytes they get five to ten times the throughput. Larger values for most users don't seem to improve performance. If you are interested in improving your backup speeds, this is definitely a place to experiment. You will probably also want to make the corresponding change in each of your File daemons conf files. Bob Hi! We're seeing strange behaviour with Bacula 5.0.3 on Debian/Squeeze and Kernels 2.6.36 and 2.6.32 (for a while, we've had CentOS 5 for testing, but that didn't change a thing). See the 'btape fill' results below, the write speed doesn't get above 50MB/s - the tape drive is an ULTRIUM-HH4 LTO4 drive in a Tandberg StorageLoader. Tar is able to write with 120MB/s to the tapes. I tried different block sizes (64K to 2M; the tape drive claims to support up to 16M, but Linux doesn't let me), the relevant parts of bacula-sd.conf are below. I'm quit out of ideas how I could speed up the tape writes for bacula? The system btw is a single Xeon E5420, 8GB Ram. The Storage Library/Tape drives are SAS-connected via a LSI Logig MPTSAS 1068E and storage is a 24-disk Raid50 via Adaptec 52445. 16-Nov 17:02 btape JobId 0: 3304 Issuing autochanger load slot 1, drive 0 command. 16-Nov 17:03 btape JobId 0: 3305 Autochanger load slot 1, drive 0, status is OK. Wrote Volume label for volume TestVolume1. Wrote Start of Session label. 17:03:23 Begin writing Bacula records to first tape ... Wrote block=5000, file,blk=11,239 VolBytes=10,483,662,848 rate=47.01 MB/s Wrote block=1, file,blk=22,3 VolBytes=20,969,422,848 rate=40.87 MB/s Wrote block=15000, file,blk=32,243 VolBytes=31,455,182,848 rate=42.68 MB/s Wrote block=2, file,blk=43,7 VolBytes=41,940,942,848 rate=45.93 MB/s Wrote block=25000, file,blk=53,247 VolBytes=52,426,702,848 rate=46.27 MB/s Wrote block=3, file,blk=64,11 VolBytes=62,912,462,848 rate=47.87 MB/s 17:25:41 Flush block, write EOF Wrote block=35000, file,blk=74,251 VolBytes=73,398,222,848 rate=48.03 MB/s Wrote block=4, file,blk=85,15 VolBytes=83,883,982,848 rate=49.02 MB/s Wrote block=45000, file,blk=95,255 VolBytes=94,369,742,848 rate=49.15 MB/s Wrote block=5, file,blk=106,19 VolBytes=104,855,502,848 rate=49.74 MB/s Wrote block=55000, file,blk=116,259 VolBytes=115,341,262,848 rate=49.82 MB/s Wrote block=6, file,blk=127,23 VolBytes=125,827,022,848 rate=50.13 MB/s 17:46:06 Flush block, write EOF Wrote block=65000, file,blk=137,263 VolBytes=136,312,782,848 rate=50.29 MB/s Wrote block=7, file,blk=148,27 VolBytes=146,798,542,848 rate=50.29 MB/s Wrote block=75000, file,blk=158,267 VolBytes=157,284,302,848 rate=50.52 MB/s Wrote block=8, file,blk=169,31 VolBytes=167,770,062,848 rate=50.50 MB/s Wrote block=85000, file,blk=179,271 VolBytes=178,255,822,848 rate=50.81 MB/s Wrote block=9, file,blk=190,35 VolBytes=188,741,582,848 rate=49.16 MB/s 18:08:33 Flush block, write EOF Wrote block=95000, file,blk=200,275 VolBytes=199,227,342,848 rate=49.50 MB/s Wrote block=10, file,blk=211,39 VolBytes=209,713,102,848 rate=49.43 MB/s Wrote block=105000, file,blk=221,279 VolBytes=220,198,862,848 rate=49.79 MB/s Wrote block=11, file,blk=232,43 VolBytes=230,684,622,848 rate=49.65 MB/s Wrote block=115000, file,blk=242,283
[Bacula-users] Software compression: None
Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. Recently noticed a few Software Compression: None reports lately, affecting about 10% of my backup jobs, both large and small. Software compression is most definitely turned on. What is this telling me? Steve Steve Thompson E-mail: smt AT vgersoft DOT com Voyager Software LLC Web: http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com 39 Smugglers Path VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com Ithaca, NY 14850 186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning
What you've hit on is something I've noted too... I'm thinking it would be a nice tweak/enhancement to bacula if the pruning function was disabled on restore jobs. Another case that could trigger it might be just restoring from your oldest backup. I've no idea how simple this change might be, though. It seems rather counter intuitive for bacula to try to prune something at the end of a restore job (successful or failed) so it may be a bigger project than adding a simple if statement... Has anybody dug into that part of the code? Bob From: Craig Miskell craig.misk...@opus.co.nz Subject: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning To: bacula-users bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 4ce45109.4010...@opus.co.nz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's file records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to get the records back into the database. The operator then tried to run a restore, but had managed to leave the tape drive in an inconsistent state (unmounted, with the tape in it, so mtx had a hernia), and the Restore job failed. That's unfortunate, but it happens, and isn't the real problem. When the job failed and finished, the File Retention period kicked in, and the bscan'd records were purged. This is somewhat annoying, and means we have to bscan again (4 hours+). In the general case of a bscan and a single successful restore, it's pretty much ok. But in case of a failure of the restore, or if we find we have to do more than one restore (the user decides they need more files after the first batch), this is a real pain. The somewhat crude approach is to raise File Retention on the client to a big enough period to cover back to when the tape was written, while going through the bscan/restore process, and setting it back to normal afterwards. Is there a better way? I'm thinking of something like marking the job as not-pruneable after the bscan and while doing restores, but I'm open to any suggestions. Thanks, - -- Craig Miskell Senior Systems Administrator Opus International Consultants Phone: +64 4 471 7209 I think we agree, the past is over - -George W Bush -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Tuning for large (millions of files) backups?
On 13/11/10 04:46, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: You mean looks increasingly *unlikely* don't you? As InnoDB is the default in MySQL 5.5... Yes it is, but take a look at what Oracle's been doing to the other opensource projects it inherited. It says a lot when core mysql developers fork a new project. It says a lot more when this happens across a number of projects including the entire Open Office developer team. I suspect there to be at least one person involved in this discussion who has *religion* in relation to database engines... Nothing to do with religion - and FWIW, stating that postgresql requires a DBA is a clear case of FUD. My point of view comes from running both engines on the same hardware and observing the loads involved. Personally I'd prefer to be running mysql but it was clear postgres ran faster and had lower memory foorprints for our use than innodb. Others have reported the same thing over the years. (Longer term I'm concerned about what Oracle may do with Mysql as we have a number of databases installed on various machines machines doing various things for various groups space scientists are difficult to deal with at the best of times, let alone if they have to change tools.) Frankly, I'd rather there were reliable connectors and queries available for Oracle and DB2, rather than this childish prattle over MySQL and PostGRES. It'd be nice, but it's not going to happen unless someone who wants them, writes it (or pays for it) -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] File mismatch by -1, after a computer crash
Using bacula v 5.0.2 on A netbsd machine v 5.1 (64bit ) I have this strange problem when after a computer crash, the next time bacula tries to write to tape it gets the file count wrong by -1 file. No backups are running when the computer crashes. The error is: Error: Bacula cannot write on tape Volume 57 because: The number of files mismatch! Volume=70 Catalog=71 if I do a bscan of the tape. the end result looks like this, but the main point is it seems to agree with the catalog number 19-Nov 13:39 bscan JobId 0: End of Volume at file 71 on device BACKUP-LTO-1 (/dev/nrst1), Volume 57 bscan: bscan.c:337-5818 == JobId=0 19-Nov 13:39 bscan JobId 0: End of all volumes. bscan: bscan.c:424 Record: SessId=0 SessTim=0 FileIndex=-6 Stream=0 len=0 End of physical tape. bscan: bscan.c:637 End of all Volumes. VolFiles=71 VolBlocks=0 VolBytes=59,378,195,110 Records would have been added or updated in the catalog: 1 Media 1 Pool 95 Job 579697 File Going into bconsole and reducing the file count by 1 allows the tape to be written to, but I suspect the last backup to the tape has now just been corrupted. There are three tape drives on the machine (2 LTO4 1 DLT drives) and this happens to every tape in all drives. You are unable to use those tapes again unit you fix the file number up or purge the tape. Bacula works correctly in every other way I have successfully done multiple backups and restores. Has anyone seen this kind of behaviour before or have any suggestions, any help would be much appreciated. Royce -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning
On 11/18/2010 4:20 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote: From: Craig Miskellcraig.misk...@opus.co.nz Subject: [Bacula-users] bscan, file retention, and pruning To: bacula-usersbacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID:4ce45109.4010...@opus.co.nz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's file records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to get the records back into the database. The operator then tried to run a restore, but had managed to leave the tape drive in an inconsistent state (unmounted, with the tape in it, so mtx had a hernia), and the Restore job failed. That's unfortunate, but it happens, and isn't the real problem. When the job failed and finished, the File Retention period kicked in, and the bscan'd records were purged. This is somewhat annoying, and means we have to bscan again (4 hours+). In the general case of a bscan and a single successful restore, it's pretty much ok. But in case of a failure of the restore, or if we find we have to do more than one restore (the user decides they need more files after the first batch), this is a real pain. The somewhat crude approach is to raise File Retention on the client to a big enough period to cover back to when the tape was written, while going through the bscan/restore process, and setting it back to normal afterwards. Is there a better way? I'm thinking of something like marking the job as not-pruneable after the bscan and while doing restores, but I'm open to any suggestions. Thanks, What you've hit on is something I've noted too... I'm thinking it would be a nice tweak/enhancement to bacula if the pruning function was disabled on restore jobs. Another case that could trigger it might be just restoring from your oldest backup. I've no idea how simple this change might be, though. It seems rather counter intuitive for bacula to try to prune something at the end of a restore job (successful or failed) so it may be a bigger project than adding a simple if statement... Has anybody dug into that part of the code? Do not set auto prune on. Instead, use an Admin job to do your pruning for you. -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] 10,000th backup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just hit my 10,000th backup with Bacula. Wanted to say thanks again for this piece of software. Might have been initially a little tricky to set up, but it does the job day in and day out. The weakest link in the process is the human that changes the tape (which is often me). - -- - _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Sr. Systems Programmer |$| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |novos...@umdnj.edu - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/CST-Academic Svcs. - ADMC 450, Newark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzmDVgACgkQmb+gadEcsb7ffQCgygrhwkwmt4Qw+4kBWiXrxkv0 CRQAoKMTUrOlchuHT96sgGur5znULPKc =cRW/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- attachment: novosirj.vcf-- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
