Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + MS SQLServer + Shadow Copy
Dear Gilberto,
Place the following option in your FileSet configuration:
Enable VSS = yes
This option will allow Bacula to backup open files.
Use this option only when you are trying to backup Windows machine with
a OS not prior to Windows XP.
Quoting the Bacula Main Reference - 09112014:
Technically Bacula creates a shadow copy as soon as the backup process
starts. It does then backup all files from the shadow copy and destroys
the shadow copy after the backup process.
In short:
- Bacula will start the VSS service on you Windows Server to create a
backup.
- After the backup is done, Bacula will stop the VSS service.
Here is an example of a FileSet with VSS enabled:
FileSet {
Name = Windows FileSet
Enable VSS = yes
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
compression = GZIP
}
File = C:/
}
Exclude {
File = C:/pagefile.sys
File = C:/hiberfil.sys
}
}
Best regards,
Luc Assoua.
Gilberto Nunes mailto:gilberto.nune...@gmail.com
Friday, August 7, 2015 2:03 PMvia Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=emailutm_medium=sumlinkutm_campaign=reach
Hello friends...
Is there anybody here know something about make backup with bacula in
a MS Windows with SQL Server??
I try it, but I get error that Shadow Copy is not active!
So I ask because I am afraid that active Shadow Copy will interfere
with SQL Server in same way...
I hope that I am clear about this issue!
Thanks for any kind of help.
Best regards
--
Gilberto Ferreira
+55 (47) 9676-7530
Skype: gilberto.nunes36
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Sent from Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=emailutm_medium=siglinkutm_campaign=reach
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
Hello Michael, From your first post, the header of the email shows a 6:00 AM time, not the 11:00 AM. Are your sure they are the same e-mails? Is there any other e-mail in bac...@example.com mailbox that arrived at 11:00 AM? -- Forwarded message -- From: Bacula backup@ example .com Date: Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM Subject: Bacula daemon message To: it@ example.com Best regards, Ana Looking carefully your first post, the e-mail sent with the authentication error took place at 6 am and not 11 am. This log register do not seems to be the log for your error message. Instead it seems to be an e-mail sent by bacula after restarting. Em ter, 11 de ago de 2015 às 15:21, Michael Schwager mschwa...@mochotrading.com escreveu: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: Looks like a bug to me (I've just created http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2159). Thanks. I have contributed to your bug report. *- Mike Schwager (aka, The Most Greyish of Gnomes)* * Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LLC* * 312-646-4783 312-646-4783 Phone312-637-0011 312-637-0011 Cell312-957-9804 312-957-9804 Fax* This message is for the named person(s) use only. It may contain confidential proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Mocho Trading LLC reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity.-- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + MS SQLServer + Shadow Copy
Hello guys
I am very sorry!
It was my mistake... I had installed 32 bits version with Windows 64 bits!
Sorry for the mess!
Thanks
2015-08-11 18:06 GMT-03:00 E.L.L. Assoua ellass...@gmail.com:
Dear Gilberto,
Place the following option in your FileSet configuration:
Enable VSS = yes
This option will allow Bacula to backup open files.
Use this option only when you are trying to backup Windows machine with a
OS not prior to Windows XP.
Quoting the Bacula Main Reference - 09112014:
Technically Bacula creates a shadow copy as soon as the backup process
starts. It does then backup all files from the shadow copy and destroys the
shadow copy after the backup process.
In short:
- Bacula will start the VSS service on you Windows Server to create a
backup.
- After the backup is done, Bacula will stop the VSS service.
Here is an example of a FileSet with VSS enabled:
FileSet {
Name = Windows FileSet
Enable VSS = yes
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
compression = GZIP
}
File = C:/
}
Exclude {
File = C:/pagefile.sys
File = C:/hiberfil.sys
}
}
Best regards,
Luc Assoua.
Gilberto Nunes gilberto.nune...@gmail.com
Friday, August 7, 2015 2:03 PM via Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=emailutm_medium=sumlinkutm_campaign=reach
Hello friends...
Is there anybody here know something about make backup with bacula in a MS
Windows with SQL Server??
I try it, but I get error that Shadow Copy is not active!
So I ask because I am afraid that active Shadow Copy will interfere with
SQL Server in same way...
I hope that I am clear about this issue!
Thanks for any kind of help.
Best regards
--
Gilberto Ferreira
+55 (47) 9676-7530
Skype: gilberto.nunes36
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Sent from Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=emailutm_medium=siglinkutm_campaign=reach
--
Gilberto Ferreira
+55 (47) 9676-7530
Skype: gilberto.nunes36
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] bacula-fd cannot access files from the system still getting [permission denied]
Hi, I have been searching around a lot about “permission denied” errors, however, none of them matches my case. I am keeping getting Permission denied error on bacula-fd daemon. In the manual, it says that run the file system daemon as root. I am assuming it means the following, -rw-r- 1 root bacula 1012 Mar 6 2013 bacula-fd.conf” However, it seems not working at all. In addition, I keep other configuration files with user as bacula and group as bacula. Is this the correct? How can I check whether the daemon is running as root user or some others? What does the manual mean by “run file system daemon as root”? Thanks, Jing -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd cannot access files from the system still getting [permission denied]
On Tuesday 2015-08-11 02:40:01 Jing Yang wrote: Hi, I have been searching around a lot about “permission denied” errors, however, none of them matches my case. I am keeping getting Permission denied error on bacula-fd daemon. In the manual, it says that run the file system daemon as root. I am assuming it means the following, -rw-r- 1 root bacula 1012 Mar 6 2013 bacula-fd.conf” However, it seems not working at all. In addition, I keep other configuration files with user as bacula and group as bacula. Is this the correct? How can I check whether the daemon is running as root user or some others? What does the manual mean by “run file system daemon as root”? Thanks, Jing It means that the bacula-fd process should be owned by root. You can check that with ps command, e.g. ps aux | grep bacula-fd It might be a good idea to get to know how unix works and get familiarize with the basic and common unix/linux commands before you continue playing with backup systems. bacula-fd binary itself supports the option -u which is used to specify the user bacula-fd should use. You are probably going to use init script provided for easier bacula-fd starting/stopping and looking into that init script might give you an idea how to specify the user for the bacula-fd. For example, on RHEL/Centos, bacula-fd init script would source the file /etc/sysconfig/bacula-fd which contains variables used to define the user for the bacula-fd daemon. Almost certainly you want bacula-fd to run as root but this depends on your specific needs. In any case you should ensure that bacula-fd init script is executed by root (like any other init script on the system). -- Josip Deanovic -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
hi,
check the mail-headers ('received-from' etc.) to find out
which servers were involved.
Michael Schwager schrieb:
Hello,
Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't know
why I received this message now, and I'd like to prevent it from recurring.
...It makes my boss anxious. :-)
The mail was sent at 11:00 UTC. There is no other job scheduled in
bacula-dir or in cron that would take place at the time this email was
sent. My maillog is consistent with that. I have verified that the mail
came from bacula-dir
I wonder if a start of the bacula director would send an email, but I just
tried it and it did not send the email again (see the cron operations that
are performed, below). Does bacula-dir send error messages that are = 1
week old, upon startup?
At 11:00 UTC my system performs the following from cron, in order to
perform a binary backup:
systemctl stop bacula-dir
systemctl stop bacula-sd
systemctl stop bacula-fd
systemctl stop mysqld
(copy database dir)
systemctl start mysqld
systemctl start bacula-fd
systemctl stop bacula-sd
systemctl stop bacula-dir
Thanks for any help.
*- Mike Schwager*
* Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LLC*
* 312-646-4783 Phone312-637-0011 Cell312-957-9804 Fax*
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bacula backup@
example
.com
Date: Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM
Subject: Bacula daemon message
To: it@
example.com
02-Aug 22:24 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: authenticate.c:114 Director
unable to authenticate with Storage daemon at -backup-01.example.com:9103
http://backup-01.example.com:9103. Possible causes:
Passwords or names not the same or
Maximum Concurrent Jobs exceeded on the SD or
SD networking messed up (restart daemon).
Please see
http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026
for help.
03-Aug 02:38 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: authenticate.c:114 Director
unable to authenticate with Storage daemon at
http://backup-01.example.com:9103;. Possible causes:
Passwords or names not the same or
Maximum Concurrent Jobs exceeded on the SD or
SD networking messed up (restart daemon).
Please see
http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026
for help.
03-Aug 02:49 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: authenticate.c:114 Director
unable to authenticate with Storage daemon at
http://backup-01.example.com:9103;. Possible causes:
Passwords or names not the same or
Maximum Concurrent Jobs exceeded on the SD or
SD networking messed up (restart daemon).
Please see
http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Freque_Asked_Questi.html#SECTION0026
for help.
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
Mit besten Grüßen / Kind Regards
Andreas Nastke
IT System Management
g/d/p Markt- und Sozialforschung GmbH
Ein Unternehmen der Forschungsgruppe g/d/p
Richardstr. 18
D-22081 Hamburg
Fon: +49 (0)40 / 29876-117
Fax: +49 (0)40 / 29876-127
nas...@gdp-group.com
www.gdp-group.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft ist Hamburg, Handelsregister Hamburg, HRB 40482
Geschäftsführer: Christa Braaß, Volker Rohweder
---
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete
this e-mail from your whole system. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure
or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
---
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
Hello all, I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage. Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and encounter problem: Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d What can I use on regular basis to ensure that bacula still can read volume? Unfortunately verify job checks only the last job but data corruption could happen later. Thanks in advance. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d Those are not filesystem errors but lack of sync between what Bacula Catalog expects and the actual file volumes. You could run a preventive bscan to fix that, but I think it's much better to deal with the root cause of this, that would be abruptly terminating backup jobs (e.g.: restart daemons with jobs running on it, power shortage etc.). You should check Bacula logs to figure it out. Regards, === Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified Administrator II Treinamento Telepresencial Bacula Início 5 de agosto: http://www.bacula.com.br/?p=2174 61 8268-4220 Site: www.bacula.com.br | Facebook: heitor.faria - Original Message - From: Andrey Tataranovich tataranov...@gmail.com To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:46:24 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:05:14 -0400 Josh Fisher jfis...@pvct.com wrote: Bacula volumes are just normal files. You could periodically check the filesystem with e2fsck or whatever tool is used for the filesystem you are using. I already tried to run fsck on bacula volume when error occured, but found no error. e2fsck checks only filesystem metadata consistency but not data. So errors inside volume files (uncorrectable bit errors as example) will be not found by this tool. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
Hello Heitor, Sorry, but in this case, this is a checksum error (the checksum in the header of the block does not correspond to the checksum of the actual block data that was read) and not a number of EOF marks error. The EOF mismatch is basically a synchronization error between the volume and the catalog. However, in this case, it is most likely a disk corruption problem. Yes. Sorry about that. I read the word mismatch and started to write. =P Best regards, Kern On 11.08.2015 14:18, Heitor Faria wrote: Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d Those are not filesystem errors but lack of sync between what Bacula Catalog expects and the actual file volumes. You could run a preventive bscan to fix that, but I think it's much better to deal with the root cause of this, that would be abruptly terminating backup jobs (e.g.: restart daemons with jobs running on it, power shortage etc.). You should check Bacula logs to figure it out. Regards, === Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified Administrator II Treinamento Telepresencial Bacula Início 5 de agosto: http://www.bacula.com.br/?p=2174 61 8268-4220 Site: www.bacula.com.br | Facebook: heitor.faria - Original Message - From: Andrey Tataranovich tataranov...@gmail.com To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:46:24 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:05:14 -0400 Josh Fisher jfis...@pvct.com wrote: Bacula volumes are just normal files. You could periodically check the filesystem with e2fsck or whatever tool is used for the filesystem you are using. I already tried to run fsck on bacula volume when error occured, but found no error. e2fsck checks only filesystem metadata consistency but not data. So errors inside volume files (uncorrectable bit errors as example) will be not found by this tool. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On 8/11/2015 6:43 AM, Andrey Tataranovich wrote: Hello all, I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage. Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and encounter problem: Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d What can I use on regular basis to ensure that bacula still can read volume? Unfortunately verify job checks only the last job but data corruption could happen later. Bacula volumes are just normal files. You could periodically check the filesystem with e2fsck or whatever tool is used for the filesystem you are using. -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Specified slot ignored
Hi, One think more..I see these jobs running on catalog 1 (the default catalog=MyCatalog) and not in 2 *use catalog=Preservation Using Catalog Preservation Using Catalog name=Preservation DB=bacula_longterm 326 | Cab47 | 2015-06-13 01:07:55 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 327 | Cab48 | 2015-06-13 01:07:59 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 328 | Cab49 | 2015-06-13 01:08:01 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 329 | Cab50 | 2015-06-13 01:08:03 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 330 | CabSub | 2015-06-13 01:08:05 | B| I |10,473 | 241,931,499,589 | T | *use catalog=MyCatalog Using Catalog MyCatalog Using Catalog name=MyCatalog DB=bacula | 17,107 | Cab21| 2015-08-11 10:45:57 | B| F | 0 | 0 | f | | 17,191 | CabSub | 2015-08-11 11:20:51 | B| F | 0 | 0 | R | +++-+--+---+---+---+---+ How can i force to run in Catalog 2?? Cheers, I 2015-08-11 13:15 GMT+02:00 Iban Cabrillo cabri...@ifca.unican.es: Dear Bacula Admins, Since a couple of weeks I have some troubles trying to backup some files. I have two catalogs one for sort cycled backups and other for long time backup. each one of them with their respective pools it has been working fine for year. but since a couple of weeks I can not make incremental backs for longtime catalog. The pool has appendable volumes: ... | 58 | B01036LV | Full | 1 | 1,338,922,180,608 | 1,383 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 84 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-03-15 07:05:15 | | 59 | B01037LV | Full | 1 | 1,420,738,785,280 | 1,443 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 85 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-04-12 03:52:47 | | 60 | B01038LV | Append| 1 | 453,005,337,600 | 495 | 630,720,000 | 0 |8 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-06-13 07:37:21 | | 61 | B01039LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 87 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 62 | B01040LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 88 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 63 | B01041LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 89 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 64 | B01042LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 90 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | +-++---+-+---+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ * Device status: Autochanger TSM3500 with devices: ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0) Device FileStorage (/data/Bacula/Default) is not open. Device ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) is not open. Drive 1 is not loaded. Device ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0) is not open. Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: Pool:Cabas Media type: LTO-5 Drive 0 is not loaded. Even mounting the tape using mtx command and (*mount slot=8...) It does not work. Any idea? Regards, I -- Iban Cabrillo Bartolome Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA) Santander, Spain Tel: +34942200969 PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD9DF0B3D6C8C08AC Bertrand Russell: *El problema con el mundo es que los estúpidos están seguros de todo y los inteligentes están llenos de dudas* -- Iban Cabrillo Bartolome Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA) Santander, Spain Tel: +34942200969 PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD9DF0B3D6C8C08AC Bertrand Russell: *El problema con el mundo es que los estúpidos están seguros de todo y los inteligentes están llenos de dudas* -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:40:30 -0400 Bill Arlofski waa-bac...@revpol.com wrote: As of v5.2.x, you have the ability to specify any jobid to be verified on the command line. From the v5.2.1 main.pdf manual: 8 New Features in 5.2.x 3.6 Ability to Verify any specified Job You now have the ability to tell Bacula which Job should verify instead of automatically verify just the last one. This feature can be used with VolumeToCatalog, DiskToCatalog and Catalog level. To verify a given job, just specify the Job jobid in argument when starting the job. * run job=VerifyVolume jobid=1 level=VolumeToCatalog 8 So, if you really wanted to periodically check (a|any|random) Bacula file volume(s) you could easily script it by piping such a run command to bconsole with the required jobid. Thanks a lot! I will try this solution. Seems I need to reread New Features in bacula documentation. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Specified slot ignored
Dear Bacula Admins, Since a couple of weeks I have some troubles trying to backup some files. I have two catalogs one for sort cycled backups and other for long time backup. each one of them with their respective pools it has been working fine for year. but since a couple of weeks I can not make incremental backs for longtime catalog. The pool has appendable volumes: ... | 58 | B01036LV | Full | 1 | 1,338,922,180,608 | 1,383 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 84 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-03-15 07:05:15 | | 59 | B01037LV | Full | 1 | 1,420,738,785,280 |1,443 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 85 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-04-12 03:52:47 | | 60 | B01038LV | Append| 1 | 453,005,337,600 | 495 | 630,720,000 | 0 |8 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-06-13 07:37:21 | | 61 | B01039LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 |0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 87 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 62 | B01040LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 |0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 88 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 63 | B01041LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 |0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 89 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 64 | B01042LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 |0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 90 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | +-++---+-+---+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ * Device status: Autochanger TSM3500 with devices: ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0) Device FileStorage (/data/Bacula/Default) is not open. Device ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) is not open. Drive 1 is not loaded. Device ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0) is not open. Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: Pool:Cabas Media type: LTO-5 Drive 0 is not loaded. Even mounting the tape using mtx command and (*mount slot=8...) It does not work. Any idea? Regards, I -- Iban Cabrillo Bartolome Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA) Santander, Spain Tel: +34942200969 PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD9DF0B3D6C8C08AC Bertrand Russell: *El problema con el mundo es que los estúpidos están seguros de todo y los inteligentes están llenos de dudas* -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd cannot access files from the system still getting [permission denied]
Hi,
I have been searching around a lot about “permission denied” errors,
however,
none of them matches my case. I am keeping getting Permission denied
error on
bacula-fd daemon. In the manual, it says that run the file system daemon
as
root. I am assuming it means the following,
-rw-r- 1 root bacula 1012 Mar 6 2013 bacula-fd.conf”
However, it seems not working at all. In addition, I keep other configuration
files with user as bacula and group as bacula. Is this the correct? How can I
check whether the daemon is running as root user or some others? What does the
manual mean by “run file system daemon as root”?
Hello Jing: vi /etc/init.d/bacula-fd
...
NAME=bacula-fd
DESC=Bacula File Daemon
DAEMON=/usr/sbin/${NAME}
BUSER=
BGROUP=
BOPTIONS=-c /etc/bacula/${NAME}.conf
BPORT=9102
...
Regards,
===
Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified
Administrator II
Do you need Bacula training?
https://www.udemy.com/bacula-backup-software/?couponCode=bacula-list
+55 61 8268-4220
Site: http://bacula.us FB: heitor.faria
===
Thanks,
Jing
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On 08/11/2015 06:43 AM, Andrey Tataranovich wrote: Hello all, I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage. Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and encounter problem: Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d What can I use on regular basis to ensure that bacula still can read volume? Unfortunately verify job checks only the last job but data corruption could happen later. Thanks in advance. Hi Andrey, As of v5.2.x, you have the ability to specify any jobid to be verified on the command line. From the v5.2.1 main.pdf manual: 8 New Features in 5.2.x 3.6 Ability to Verify any specified Job You now have the ability to tell Bacula which Job should verify instead of automatically verify just the last one. This feature can be used with VolumeToCatalog, DiskToCatalog and Catalog level. To verify a given job, just specify the Job jobid in argument when starting the job. * run job=VerifyVolume jobid=1 level=VolumeToCatalog 8 So, if you really wanted to periodically check (a|any|random) Bacula file volume(s) you could easily script it by piping such a run command to bconsole with the required jobid. Hope this helps. Bill -- Bill Arlofski http://www.revpol.com/bacula -- Not responsible for anything below this line -- -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:05:14 -0400 Josh Fisher jfis...@pvct.com wrote: Bacula volumes are just normal files. You could periodically check the filesystem with e2fsck or whatever tool is used for the filesystem you are using. I already tried to run fsck on bacula volume when error occured, but found no error. e2fsck checks only filesystem metadata consistency but not data. So errors inside volume files (uncorrectable bit errors as example) will be not found by this tool. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
Hello Heitor, Sorry, but in this case, this is a checksum error (the checksum in the header of the block does not correspond to the checksum of the actual block data that was read) and not a number of EOF marks error. The EOF mismatch is basically a synchronization error between the volume and the catalog. However, in this case, it is most likely a disk corruption problem. Best regards, Kern On 11.08.2015 14:18, Heitor Faria wrote: Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d Those are not filesystem errors but lack of sync between what Bacula Catalog expects and the actual file volumes. You could run a preventive bscan to fix that, but I think it's much better to deal with the root cause of this, that would be abruptly terminating backup jobs (e.g.: restart daemons with jobs running on it, power shortage etc.). You should check Bacula logs to figure it out. Regards, === Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified Administrator II Treinamento Telepresencial Bacula Início 5 de agosto: http://www.bacula.com.br/?p=2174 61 8268-4220 Site: www.bacula.com.br | Facebook: heitor.faria - Original Message - From: Andrey Tataranovich tataranov...@gmail.com To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:46:24 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:05:14 -0400 Josh Fisher jfis...@pvct.com wrote: Bacula volumes are just normal files. You could periodically check the filesystem with e2fsck or whatever tool is used for the filesystem you are using. I already tried to run fsck on bacula volume when error occured, but found no error. e2fsck checks only filesystem metadata consistency but not data. So errors inside volume files (uncorrectable bit errors as example) will be not found by this tool. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Specified slot ignored
Hi, Solved, Sometime time ago I changed the client used to do the backup and it was pointed out to the default catalog. Cheers, I 2015-08-11 13:44 GMT+02:00 Iban Cabrillo cabri...@ifca.unican.es: Hi, One think more..I see these jobs running on catalog 1 (the default catalog=MyCatalog) and not in 2 *use catalog=Preservation Using Catalog Preservation Using Catalog name=Preservation DB=bacula_longterm 326 | Cab47 | 2015-06-13 01:07:55 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 327 | Cab48 | 2015-06-13 01:07:59 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 328 | Cab49 | 2015-06-13 01:08:01 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 329 | Cab50 | 2015-06-13 01:08:03 | B| I | 0 | 0 | T | | 330 | CabSub | 2015-06-13 01:08:05 | B| I |10,473 | 241,931,499,589 | T | *use catalog=MyCatalog Using Catalog MyCatalog Using Catalog name=MyCatalog DB=bacula | 17,107 | Cab21| 2015-08-11 10:45:57 | B| F | 0 | 0 | f | | 17,191 | CabSub | 2015-08-11 11:20:51 | B| F | 0 | 0 | R | +++-+--+---+---+---+---+ How can i force to run in Catalog 2?? Cheers, I 2015-08-11 13:15 GMT+02:00 Iban Cabrillo cabri...@ifca.unican.es: Dear Bacula Admins, Since a couple of weeks I have some troubles trying to backup some files. I have two catalogs one for sort cycled backups and other for long time backup. each one of them with their respective pools it has been working fine for year. but since a couple of weeks I can not make incremental backs for longtime catalog. The pool has appendable volumes: ... | 58 | B01036LV | Full | 1 | 1,338,922,180,608 | 1,383 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 84 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-03-15 07:05:15 | | 59 | B01037LV | Full | 1 | 1,420,738,785,280 | 1,443 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 85 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-04-12 03:52:47 | | 60 | B01038LV | Append| 1 | 453,005,337,600 | 495 | 630,720,000 | 0 |8 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2015-06-13 07:37:21 | | 61 | B01039LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 87 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 62 | B01040LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 88 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 63 | B01041LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 89 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | | 64 | B01042LV | Append| 1 | 1,024 | 0 | 630,720,000 | 0 | 90 | 1 | LTO-5 | -00-00 00:00:00 | +-++---+-+---+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+ * Device status: Autochanger TSM3500 with devices: ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0) Device FileStorage (/data/Bacula/Default) is not open. Device ULT3580-TD3 (/dev/nst1) is not open. Drive 1 is not loaded. Device ULT3580-TD5 (/dev/nst0) is not open. Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for: Pool:Cabas Media type: LTO-5 Drive 0 is not loaded. Even mounting the tape using mtx command and (*mount slot=8...) It does not work. Any idea? Regards, I -- Iban Cabrillo Bartolome Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA) Santander, Spain Tel: +34942200969 PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD9DF0B3D6C8C08AC Bertrand Russell: *El problema con el mundo es que los estúpidos están seguros de todo y los inteligentes están llenos de dudas* -- Iban Cabrillo Bartolome Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA) Santander, Spain Tel: +34942200969 PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD9DF0B3D6C8C08AC Bertrand Russell: *El problema con el mundo es que los estúpidos están seguros de todo y los inteligentes están llenos de dudas* -- Iban Cabrillo Bartolome Instituto de Fisica de Cantabria (IFCA) Santander, Spain Tel: +34942200969 PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD9DF0B3D6C8C08AC
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:43:52 +0300, Andrey Tataranovich said: Hello all, I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage. Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and encounter problem: Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350! Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290 blk=5201271d What can I use on regular basis to ensure that bacula still can read volume? Unfortunately verify job checks only the last job but data corruption could happen later. You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume. I recomend use a more secure fileserver to store your backups (RAID, or ZFS). __Martin -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] copy jobs
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 01:01:35AM -0300, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: Hello Lukas, I was wondering if this could be solved using cloned copy jobs :) can you give me some pointers what are cloned copy jobs and how to setup them? otherwise, correct solution is to have separated pools and copy complete pool? -- Lukáš Hejtmánek -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:01:43 -0500, Michael Schwager said: Hello, Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't know why I received this message now, and I'd like to prevent it from recurring. ...It makes my boss anxious. :-) The mail was sent at 11:00 UTC. There is no other job scheduled in bacula-dir or in cron that would take place at the time this email was sent. My maillog is consistent with that. I have verified that the mail came from bacula-dir Looks like a bug to me (I've just created http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2159). __Martin -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100 Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume. I recomend use a more secure fileserver to store your backups (RAID, or ZFS). This error has happened on mirror raid, so maybe only filesystems like zfs/btrfs could solve such problem on system level. I do not remember if raid5/6 protect from situation when disk read operation return incorrect data without error. -- WBR, Andrey Tataranovich -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
Thanks for the reply, Ana. But the mail *was* from Bacula. My
bacula-dir.conf looks like this:
Messages {
Name = Daemon
mailcommand = /usr/local/bin/my_smtp -h mailhub -f \\(Bacula\) \
bac...@example.com\\ -s \Bacula daemon message\ %r
...so I can debug those sneaky mail problems :-) . /usr/local/bin/my_smtp
logs the behavior; here is its code:
echo ARGUMENTS: 1:'$1' 2:'$2' 3:'$3' 4:'$4' 5:'$5' 6:'$6'
7:'$7' 8: '$8' | logger -p mail.info
/usr/sbin/bsmtp -d 10 $@ 21 | logger -p mail.info
And indeed, the mail log shows the event taking place at 11:00, the time
the mail was sent:
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: ARGUMENTS: 1:'-h' 2:'mailhub' 3:'-f'
4:'(Bacula) bac...@example.com' 5:'-s' 6:'Bacula daemon message'
7:'i...@example.com' 8: ''
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 220 mailhub.example.com
ESMTP Postfix
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 220
mailhub.example.com ESMTP Postfix
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub.example.com -- HELO
ch0-backup-01
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 250 mailhub.example.com
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 250
mailhub.example.com
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: ch0-backup-01 -- MAIL FROM:
bac...@example.com
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 250 2.1.0 Ok
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 250
2.1.0 Ok
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: ch0-backup-01 -- RCPT TO:
i...@example.com
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 250 2.1.5 Ok
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 250
2.1.5 Ok
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: ch0-backup-01 -- DATA
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 354 End data with
CRLF.CRLF
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 354
End data with CRLF.CRLF
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:594-0 From: (Bacula)
bac...@example.com
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:597-0 Subject: Bacula
daemon message
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:625-0 Sender:
bacula@ch0-backup-01
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:630-0 To:
i...@example.com bsmtp: bsmtp.c:637-0
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:650-0 Date: Sun, 09
Aug 2015 11:00:01 + (UTC)
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: ch0-backup-01 -- .
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
921D72056F
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 250
2.0.0 Ok: queued as 921D72056F
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: ch0-backup-01 -- QUIT
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: mailhub -- 221 2.0.0 Bye
Aug 9 11:00:01 ch0-backup-01 logger: bsmtp: bsmtp.c:130-0 mailhub -- 221
2.0.0 Bye
*- Mike Schwager*
* Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LLC*
* 312-646-4783 Phone312-637-0011 Cell312-957-9804 Fax*
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda
emiliaarr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Michael,
It seems not to be an issue with Bacula. Instead, maybe this mail had been
queued in your system and relayed at a later time.
Best regards,
Ana
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Michael Schwager
mschwa...@mochotrading.com wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday (Sunday) I received an email from bacula-dir but I don't know
why. It contains old authentication error messages from a week ago (see
below) that I'd rectified on the 03 August later in the day. I don't know
why I received this message now, and I'd like to prevent it from recurring.
...It makes my boss anxious. :-)
The mail was sent at 11:00 UTC. There is no other job scheduled in
bacula-dir or in cron that would take place at the time this email was
sent. My maillog is consistent with that. I have verified that the mail
came from bacula-dir
I wonder if a start of the bacula director would send an email, but I
just tried it and it did not send the email again (see the cron operations
that are performed, below). Does bacula-dir send error messages that are =
1 week old, upon startup?
At 11:00 UTC my system performs the following from cron, in order to
perform a binary backup:
systemctl stop bacula-dir
systemctl stop bacula-sd
systemctl stop bacula-fd
systemctl stop mysqld
(copy database dir)
systemctl start mysqld
systemctl start bacula-fd
systemctl stop bacula-sd
systemctl stop bacula-dir
Thanks for any help.
*- Mike Schwager*
* Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LLC*
* 312-646-4783 312-646-4783 Phone312-637-0011 312-637-0011
Cell312-957-9804 312-957-9804 Fax*
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bacula backup@
example
.com
Date: Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM
Subject: Bacula daemon message
To: it@
example.com
02-Aug 22:24 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: authenticate.c:114 Director
unable to authenticate with Storage daemon at
-backup-01.example.com:9103
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: Looks like a bug to me (I've just created http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2159). Thanks. I have contributed to your bug report. *- Mike Schwager (aka, The Most Greyish of Gnomes)* * Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LLC* * 312-646-4783 Phone312-637-0011 Cell312-957-9804 Fax* -- This message is for the named person(s) use only. It may contain confidential proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Mocho Trading LLC reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity. -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula daemon message- where did it come from?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Andreas Nastke nas...@gdp-group.com
wrote:
check the mail-headers ('received-from' etc.) to find out
which servers were involved.
I did that, but in any event my own logging (see my reply to Ana on this
thread) shows that Bacula certainly sent a message, and it was at that time.
*- Mike Schwager*
* Linux Network Engineer, Mocho Trading LLC*
* 312-646-4783 Phone312-637-0011 Cell312-957-9804 Fax*
--
This message is for the named person(s) use only. It may contain
confidential proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If
you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. Mocho Trading LLC reserves the right to monitor all e-mail
communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message
are those of the individual sender, except where the message states
otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any
such entity.
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
On 08/11/15 13:52, Andrey Tataranovich wrote: On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100 Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume. I recomend use a more secure fileserver to store your backups (RAID, or ZFS). This error has happened on mirror raid, so maybe only filesystems like zfs/btrfs could solve such problem on system level. I do not remember if raid5/6 protect from situation when disk read operation return incorrect data without error. All conventional RAID5/6 implementations that are not copy-on-write and do not feature periodic scrubbing are potentially vulnerable to silent disk corruption, aka the RAID5 write hole. ZFS is the only RAID implementation which I know to be not vulnerable to this potential failure mode. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID56 confirms that btrfs RAID5/6 is still vulnerable to the RAID5 write hole. btrfs also cannot yet recover data from parity, and suffers badly from fragmentation. The honest truth is that btrfs is still an experimental filesystem that is not nearly stable enough or mature enough for production use yet, much less for backup storage which absolutely MUST be reliable. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@co.ordinate.org Landline: 603.293.8485 -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd cannot access files from the system still getting [permission denied]
On Tuesday 2015-08-11 11:24:49 JING YANG wrote: Dear Josip, Thank you for your reply. ps aux | grep bacula-fd gives me the following: bacula 31630 0.0 0.1 198364 2936 ?Ssl 11:09 0:00 /usr/bin/bacula-fd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf Does this look right? I have checked all the possible places for bacula-fd, all the permissions seem correct. I tried Heitor's way, but no luck. I am considering reinstall the bacula. If I do that, will all the previous backup be lost? Or, is there any other way I can somehow solve this problem? Thanks, Jing Hi Jing, There is no need for reinstallation of the bacula (unless you really messed up something with its binaries and libraries). Have you checked your bacula init script for clues where additional initscript configuration could be found? For example, on RHEL/Centos and bacula 7.x I have file /etc/sysconfig/bacula-fd which contains variables that can define a user you want bacula to run with. About the ps aux... The line you have posted clearly shows that your bacula-fd daemon is running as user called bacula. That is fine if you only need to backup files readable by the user called bacula but if you want to backup complete system you almost certainly want your bacula-fd daemon to be run as root. So, check your initscript /etc/init.d/bacula-fd. Look for variables that are used as a parameter for the bacula-fd's -u option and look for the files that might be included (sourced) from the initscript. It is likely that the sourced file will contain few variables which could be used to specify a user and a group your want your bacula-fd daemon to run as. -- Josip Deanovic -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] copy jobs
Hello Lukas,
Regarding your first post, could you give more details about is it
possible to setup copy job for a single client so that all the jobs data
is stored on two different volumes
? Do you mean the same data being replicated into two different volumes
in the same pool? Sorry, I cannot see the goal here. I see copy jobs
intended for offline backups. So the data goes to a different pool from the
original ones.
I tried some configurations with the cloned copy job, but if you have more
than one job to be copied, lets say 2 jobs, you will have the original copy
job and its clone each one copying each one of the original jobs. This is
not the objective here.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Lukas Hejtmanek xhejt...@ics.muni.cz
wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to setup copy job for a single client so that all the jobs
data
is stored on two different volumes? But without specifying an extra pool
for
such a client. If I specify an extra pool, I can specify PoolUncopiedJobs.
That works but not for a single client only.
If I specify e.g. Client as a selection rule, I'm lost in a recursion
because
all copy jobs are selected for copy next time as they match a client name.
Maybe you could use an SQLQuery for this.
Selection Type = SQLQuery
Selection Pattern = SELECT DISTINCT Job.JobId FROM
\
Client,Job,JobMedia,Media WHERE Client.Name='
myclient
-fd'
\
AND Client.ClientId=Job.ClientId AND Job.Type='B'
\
AND JobStatus IN ('T') AND JobMedia.JobId=Job.JobId
\
AND JobMedia.MediaId=Media.MediaId ORDER BY Job.StartTime DESC LIMIT
X
;
This will include all your jobs for a specific client, just the backups
jobs (not the copy jobs), and if you know hoy many jobs for this client
will be copied (every time your copy job runs) you can set this value in
'X' at the end of the query.
Best regards,
Ana
So any change here?
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bsmtp failing to connect to mail server
Thank you all for the pointers and information regarding postfix and google mail. I have not determined which way I am going to proceed yet. To many other fires, which makes me check on the backups rather than check the email. Kind regards, jerry On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote: On 2015-08-08 14:23, Jerry Lowry wrote: Heitor, Sorry for not saying this in the original text. It does the same thing when I specify 'localhost'. I don't really need 'tls' that is just what gmail is looking for when I try to use them as the sending mail server. Send-only postfix setup that also accepts mail on 127.0.0.1: /etc/postfix/main.cf: myorigin = $mydomain inet_interfaces = localhost inet_protocols = ipv4 mydestination = relayhost = $mydomain local_transport = error:local mail delivery is disabled -- change myorigin and relayhost as appropriate. Plus, /etc/postfix/master.cf: #local unix - n n - - local (i.e. the local line commented out). Make sure iptables isn't blocking port 25 on localhost. To test: telnet localhost 25 -- if you get connected and 220 code from postfix you should be good to go. Note that sending mail from command line is not a useful test since it doesn't necessarily work the same way. It's calling the sendmail binary directly instead of talking to the server on port 25. And then there's gmail. It delivers some messages to all mail instead of inbox, messages whose From and To addresses are the same just vanish, and so on. So check the postfix log after running a test job: it may well be there's nothing wrong with your bsmtp or postfix config. Dima -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
