Re: [Bacula-users] How to configure Bacula with S3
On Thursday 2021-06-17 08:01:59 Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Hi Josip, > > I forgot to mention it before. > I'm running Debian 10 Buster Interesting. I just tested it on new Debian 10 installation. I tested it by putting a path in /etc/ld.so.conf before and after the include line. I have also tested it with the separate config file in the /etc/ld.so.conf.d directory. In all cases it worked as expected and the cache was properly updated. I checked the content of the cache file with "ldconfig -p" command. -- Josip Deanovic ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to configure Bacula with S3
On Thursday 2021-06-17 07:25:35 Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Hello Josip > > I don't know why, but I've run ldconfig several time and didn't worked, > only when I remove the /etc/ld.so.cache that s3 worked. Hi Wanderlei I am curious what operating system are you using? Regards! -- Josip Deanovic ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to configure Bacula with S3
Hello Josip I don't know why, but I've run ldconfig several time and didn't worked, only when I remove the /etc/ld.so.cache that s3 worked. Best regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* Em qui., 17 de jun. de 2021 às 07:04, Josip Deanovic < djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> escreveu: > On Wednesday 2021-06-16 16:44:34 Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > > Hello Erick > > > > I guess I've discovered the problem. > > I had to remove the libs cache "rm /etc/ld.so.cache" and just > > run "ldconfig" to create a new cache and then running command "s3" > > worked fine. > > > > I guess my bacula configuration (director and storage are OK), I've made > > a backup and it worked. > > > Hello! > > You don't have to remove /etc/ld.so.cache file. Just run ldconfig. > > By default only libraries found in /lib and /usr/lib will be cached. > Recent Linux distributions removed lib directory and replaced it with a > symlink pointing to usr/lib in the root directory. > > Suse 9 and probably 10 and later, used to run ldconfig with a specific > config file with every package install or update thus ignoring > /etc/ld.so.conf file which is just one of many bad decisions they did. > > > Regards! > > -- > Josip Deanovic > > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] How to configure Bacula with S3
On Wednesday 2021-06-16 16:44:34 Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Hello Erick > > I guess I've discovered the problem. > I had to remove the libs cache "rm /etc/ld.so.cache" and just > run "ldconfig" to create a new cache and then running command "s3" > worked fine. > > I guess my bacula configuration (director and storage are OK), I've made > a backup and it worked. Hello! You don't have to remove /etc/ld.so.cache file. Just run ldconfig. By default only libraries found in /lib and /usr/lib will be cached. Recent Linux distributions removed lib directory and replaced it with a symlink pointing to usr/lib in the root directory. Suse 9 and probably 10 and later, used to run ldconfig with a specific config file with every package install or update thus ignoring /etc/ld.so.conf file which is just one of many bad decisions they did. Regards! -- Josip Deanovic ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
