Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-30 Thread Hasan Elias
Does the Edict ot Toleration (1844) has to be with the prophecies as mentioned by William Sears or not?

Rich Ater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Scott,That policy doesn't appear until around 1904. The impulse to immigrate toPalestine doesn't begin until the very end of the 19th century with TheodorHerzl's zionism which held that Jews needed their own national homeland.And even he wasn't insistent that it be in Palestine. Uganda and Guyana wereboth mentioned as alternatives. We don't hear of complaints against Jewishimmigration and land purchases until 1891. And that probably wouldn't havebeen seen as a problem had it not been clear that Zionists intended to makePalestine a European colony.warmest, SusanSusan,Actually, Jews from the Russian pale started migrating to Palestine as early as 1880 to escape the pograms. Herzl, while certainly the one who gave Zionism it's lasting s!
 hape, was
 not the founder of the movement. You are right about the Ottomans clamping down in 1904, of course. A good, though biased, book about the shaping of the modern Middle East is Empires in the Sand. It deals with the downfall of the Ottoman Empire and the rise of the modern Middle Eastern states. I'm sure you know about it Susan, but some others might like to peruse it.Rich __You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]Baha'i Studies is available through the following:Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-stNews - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-stPublic - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaistOld Public -
 http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.netNew Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
"...religious truth is not absolute but relative..."
Shoghi EffendiDo You Yahoo!?

Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.
Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-30 Thread Popeyesays




In a message dated 11/30/2004 10:21:44 AM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the 
  Edict ot Toleration (1844) has to be with the prophecies as mentioned by 
  William Sears or not?

Well, it would be nice to have a good clean, clear statement by the Porte 
that Jews could return to Israel, it is not absolutely necessary to have it. 
That the Porte stopped killing apostates out of hand is certainly a major break 
in their policies and by extension it means not only that those of a Christian 
tradition could go back to Christianity it also means that those of Judaic 
traditions could go back to being Jews without fear of execution for it. Its 
"toleration" enough in my book. I would suppose opponents of the faith might be 
gleeful about it, but we'll survive their temporary glee.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Ater


Dear Scott,
That policy doesn't appear until around 1904.  The impulse to immigrate to
Palestine doesn't begin until the very end of the 19th century with Theodor
Herzl's zionism which held that Jews needed their own  national homeland.
And even he wasn't insistent that it be in Palestine. Uganda and Guyana were
both mentioned as alternatives. We don't hear of complaints against Jewish
immigration and land purchases until 1891. And that probably wouldn't have
been seen as a problem had it not been clear that Zionists intended to make
Palestine a European colony.
warmest, Susan
Susan,
   Actually, Jews from the Russian pale started migrating to Palestine 
as early as 1880 to escape the pograms. Herzl, while certainly the one 
who gave Zionism it's lasting shape, was not the founder of the 
movement. You are right about the Ottomans clamping down in 1904, of 
course. A good, though biased, book about the shaping of the modern 
Middle East is Empires in the Sand. It deals with the downfall of the 
Ottoman Empire and the rise of the modern Middle Eastern states. I'm 
sure you know about it Susan, but some others might like to peruse it.
Rich


 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Sam,

At 10:09 PM 11/27/2004, you wrote:
Admittedly I'm being rather lazy and I was wondering if anyone might be able 
to help me regarding the Edict of Toleration allegedly signed in 1844, 
mentioned by William Sears. 
I was surprised to read Russ Williams' (a Christian attacking the Faith) 
comment that:
this author has searched in over 40 encyclopedia sets and nearly 100 Jewish 
and Ottoman texts and did not find even one word about it.

To my understanding, Williams was substantially correct. There is no specific 
evidence of an edict of toleration, as Sears describes it, in 1844. The late 
William Sears personally told me that, if he had the time, he would entirely 
rewrite _Thief in the Night_.

The Edict of Toleration. In that book and several others written by both 
Bahá’í and non-Bahá’í authors, that document was overrated. Now the good 
news. We discovered a new document--proclaimed and published in 1844--that is 
far more significant than the so-called Edict of Toleration. We believe you 
should become familiar with this new document, which has remained unknown not 
only to the Bahá’í community but also to Jewish and Christian writers. 

Does the writer say why that is good news? 

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the best hamburger 
-- Mark Twain and Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread abha kingdom
Thanks Susan,

The significance ofWS's edict was that itallowed Jews to return to the Holy Land, rather than just practise their faith. Are you saying that the reply from the public record office to the "researcher" (?Sours) referred to an edict which did not state this?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Sam, I believe your researcher was probably Michael Sours Ruhani. This particular edict is one of many which Europeans pressured the Ottoman government into during the course of the 19th century. They were mostly aimed at protecting Christians. But the Ottoman government never prohibited the practice of Judaism or Christianity in Palestine. There had been Jews there all along under Islamic rule. I think Baha'is have made too much of this. warmest, Susan __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is a!
 vailable
 through the following: Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu 
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! – Try it today! 

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread Mark A. Foster
Hi, Sam,

At 09:44 AM 11/28/2004, you wrote:
I don't think anyone will disagree that TITN could do with a rewrite (I wish 
someone would!)  

If someone rewrote _Thief in the Night_, it would no longer be _Thief in the 
Night_. The major problem with the book is not its factual errors; it is the 
fact that many Baha'is have treated it as a reference work. Bill produced a 
narrative retelling of his personal search. I don't think that he ever intended 
it to be a source of accurate information. 

... but I'm not convinced that this implies that WS was wrong about this 
particular edict. He states in TITN that he secured and studied copies of 
original documents and letters.  Did he actually say he made *this* bit up?

My understanding is that the documents he studied were filtered through, and 
interpreted by, Seventh Day Adventist sources.

Well I assume it's because the edict we are discussing is questionable but 
they have found one which is valid and this is good news in terms of prophecy 
because it helps fulfill the times of the Gentiles prophecy in 1844 as 
mentioned by WS and believed unquestionably by so many Bahai's.  (I apologise 
if I've completley misunderstood your question.)

No, I think you understood my question. However, I still don't see why 
discovering such a document would be good news. 

The fact that the existence of the document, as it was described by Bill Sears, 
was accepted on face value reflects a lack of critical thinking on the parts of 
those Baha'is. If there is any good news, I think it may be that these 
individuals would, hopefully, be more cautious and critical in the future.

Mark A. Foster * http://markfoster.net
Sacred cows make the best hamburger 
-- Mark Twain and Abbie Hoffman 


__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread Smaneck
In a message dated 11/28/2004 10:17:47 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The significance of WS's edict was that it allowed Jews to return to the Holy Land, rather than just practise their faith. Are you saying that the reply from the public record office to the "researcher" (?Sours) referred to an edict which did not state this?


Dear Sam, 

So far as I know the edict had more to do with the toleration of Christians than Jews. I don't think the 'right to return' is even mentioned. Jews were not prohibited from immigrating to Palestine in the first place. I found this posting in our archives which should give you some of the details you are looking for: http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist/m30461.html

warmest, Susan 
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread Smaneck
In a message dated 11/28/2004 10:45:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

He states in TITN that he
secured and studied copies of original documents and
letters. Did he actually say he made *this* bit up?


Dear Sam, 

He doesn't say he read the original edict itself, though I agree it is implied. Here is what he wrote: ""I was able to secure and study copies of the original
letters and documents which led to the signing of the so-called Edict of
Toleration in 1844." 

I think those documents were all part of the Adventist literature .

warmest, Susan 

__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu



Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread John Bromberek
Greetings Sam,
At 10:09 PM 11/27/2004, you wrote:
I did find on the globalperspectives website the following mention of the 
Edict:

The Edict of Toleration. In that book and several others written by both 
Bahá’í and non-Bahá’í authors, that document was overrated. Now the good 
news. We discovered a new document--proclaimed and published in 1844--that 
is far more significant than the so-called Edict of Toleration. We 
believe you should become familiar with this new document, which has 
remained unknown not only to the Bahá’í community but also to Jewish and 
Christian writers. 

This intrigues me.  Ok, perhaps I'm being a little naughty and I should go 
out and buy this book I shall come again (which I will end up doing 
after finishing the several books I have yet to read) even though I 
haven't seen the whole series for sale in the UK, but I was just wondering 
if anyone knows what this is about.

Does anyone have any more info on the Edict that WS mentions or that which 
this book mentions?
   Can't say that I have seen that Web site.  I did read I Shall Come 
Again some years ago, and, this morning, reread the couple pages that 
Hushidar Motlagh devotes to this topic.  Unfortunately, his treatment 
appears little less confusing than that of William Sears.  He quotes a 
couple of Christians (a Dr. Guinness, and Leroy Froom) on the subject, but 
provides no further enlightenment as to how the so-called Edict of 
Toleration got transformed from a pronouncement that Muslims who converted 
to Christianity would no longer be executed for apostasy into a charter for 
the return of the Jews to the Holy Land.

   He does quote Guinness as saying about this edict that Europe obliged 
the Turkish Government to cease the practice of execution for 
apostasy...  This is added to other statements that refer to the Jews 
returning to the Holy Land, but the connection is not apparent to me.

   Three years ago there was a discussion of the subject on 
soc.religion.bahai.  The full discussion can be found by doing a Google of 
Groups on the subject.  I've attached a copy of what I wrote, there, at 
that time.

John B.
---
From: John Bromberek ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Edict of toleration
Newsgroups: soc.religion.bahai
Date: 2001-12-02 06:46:03 PST
On 28 Nov 2001 14:17:44 GMT, in soc.religion.bahai Geoff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've noticed over the years that people have been trying to locate the 
edict
 of toleration. It would seem to be a crucial document, on which much Baha'i
 scriptual interpretation hinges. Has a copy of it been located? What did it
 actually proclaim?

Geoff,
The subject does come up from time to time.  The last time I got involved 
in the discussion was in April of 1998 on the bahai-discuss e-mail 
list.  That exchange was sparked by earlier notes from the s.r.b newsgroup.

In a note to bahai-discuss, on April 11th, 1998, I attempted to briefly 
recount some of the history of the Palestine of that time - between 1838 
and 1857.  I won't try to get into that, but anyone who is interested might 
search out a book called Zion Before Zionism: 1838-1880, by Arnold Blumberg.

Briefly, there was a lot going on at that time with respect to increasing 
freedom (at least nominally speaking) for Jews (and Christians) in the 
Ottoman Empire, at the instigation of European powers.  It began before 
1844, though.  No specific March 21, 1844 Edict of Toleration is required 
for the fulfillment of prophecy, in this respect.  It might be nice to 
have, but would only be one relatively insignificant (and probably 
unenforced) document among many.

Moreover, it appears to be commonly agreed that there have been Jews in 
Jerusalem and the surrounding areas pretty much continuously throughout the 
last 1900 years (and, of course, before that time) - with possible 
exceptions for an occasion of Crusading fervor when Christians put everyone 
in Jerusalem to the sword, and maybe, again, at the time of the Mongol 
invasions, when there was a similar slaughter.  There may not have been a 
lot of Jews in those parts, but they were already there - and, especially, 
in somewhat greater numbers following their expulsion from Spain in 1492.

Coincidentally, two weeks after I sent that note the then-current issue of 
Journal of Baha'i Studies arrived in the mail (Vol. 8/No. 3/1998) 
containing a long article by Michael Sours (with some assistance from 
Stephen Lambden) on this very topic: The 1844 Ottoman 'Edict of 
Toleration' in Baha'i Secondary Literature (pages: 53- 80).

Earlier in the e-mail exchange Dick Detweiler had mentioned that he had 
received information from Dennis McDonnell informing him that he had 
learned that documents relevant to this edict could be found at the British 
Foreign Office, Turkey in FO78/555/No.49, and that this included 
correspondence from Sir Stratford Canning, U.K. Ambassador at the Porte.

Neither of them had subsequently actually

Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread Susan Maneck


There had been some Jews there all along. However, the policy of the Porte
was to allow no NEW Jewish settlers in Palestine lest they be inundated with
Jewish settlers.

Dear Scott,

That policy doesn't appear until around 1904.  The impulse to immigrate to
Palestine doesn't begin until the very end of the 19th century with Theodor
Herzl's zionism which held that Jews needed their own  national homeland.
And even he wasn't insistent that it be in Palestine. Uganda and Guyana were
both mentioned as alternatives. We don't hear of complaints against Jewish
immigration and land purchases until 1891. And that probably wouldn't have
been seen as a problem had it not been clear that Zionists intended to make
Palestine a European colony.

warmest, Susan



__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: Edict of toleration

2004-11-28 Thread Popeyesays




In a message dated 11/28/2004 1:26:00 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear 
  Scott,That policy doesn't appear until around 1904. The impulse 
  to immigrate toPalestine doesn't begin until the very end of the 19th 
  century with TheodorHerzl's zionism which held that Jews needed their 
  own national homeland.And even he wasn't insistent that it be in 
  Palestine. Uganda and Guyana wereboth mentioned as alternatives. We don't 
  hear of complaints against Jewishimmigration and land purchases until 
  1891. And that probably wouldn't havebeen seen as a problem had it not 
  been clear that Zionists intended to makePalestine a European 
  colony.

Thanks for the info!

it might be of interest to note that before the second world war broke out 
Adolf Eichman was in contact with Arabs and Zionists in Palestine discussing the 
possibility of find a place to move the Reich's Jews. Even as late as 1940 the 
Nazis were making noises about turning Madagascar into a Jewish homeland. Though 
of course that was just talk to placate opponents and Jews still in Germany. 
Eichmann makes some note of those discussions in the memoir cuttings that 
appeared in Life Magazine shortly after he was kidnapped and taken to Israel. He 
had been trying to find a publisher for his memoirs and that is probably the 
only reason the Mossad was able to track him down. Talk about ego biting one in 
the ass.

Regards,

Scott
__

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu