Re: [basex-talk] multi-language full-text indexing

2015-04-23 Thread Christopher Yocum
Hi Christian,

No problem.  I am always happy to help.

I did not try that as I did not have the time to implement something
like that for the project.  Also, on my machine and on the vps we were
using at least, it was fast enough for most uses.  Also, I told the
user about the problem as using diacritics was an all or nothing
setting and there was not much I could do to make it more granular.
They were content with that but I thought as the subject came up that
I would mention something.

Please let me know if you need any more information.

All the best,
Chris

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Christian Grün
christian.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Chris,

 Thanks for your feedback.

 Yes, I see that there is a lot of demand for a more customizable
 full-text index. Did you already try to build some additional index
 databases, based on the rules you were listing here? It's not as
 comfortable as a tightly coupled full-text index, but the more use
 case I get to hear of, the more I wonder if we could at all manage to
 satisfy everyone's needs..

 Cheers,
 Christian


 Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Chris Yocum cyo...@gmail.com wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA256

 Hi,

 I just want to say that for the dictionary that I used BaseX for,
 having a multi-lingual full text would have been very nice.  Bar that
 a partial index based on certain rules the user supplies would have
 also been nice.  For instance, being able to distinguish between á, a,
 and ā in a word.  In early Irish textual criticism, length marks are
 often added by text editors with a macron to denote a long vowel that
 has been idenified by the editor but is not in the original text.
 Being able to say: build an index with á and a but not ā would be
 helpful.

 I would suggest as a first pass building the index by using xml:lang
 attributes to determine what stemmer to use, etc.  If the document has
 supplied them, you could use them to build the indices differently
 based on it.

 All the best,
 Chris

 On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:35:48AM +0200, Goetz Heller wrote:
 Here's another addendum: Even if multi-language full-text indexing is not 
 going tob e implemented in the near future, it still would be a useful 
 feature to be able to restrict  full-text indexing to parts of a document, 
 e.g.

 CREATE FULL-TEXT INDEX ON DATABASE XY STARTING WITH (
   (path_a)/PART_A,
   (path_b)/ PART_B,…
 )

 Kind regards,

 Goetz

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: Christian Grün [mailto:christian.gr...@gmail.com]
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. April 2015 11:03
 An: Goetz Heller
 Cc: BaseX
 Betreff: Re: [basex-talk] multi-language full-text indexing

  It is desirable to have
  documents indexed by locale-specific parts, e.g.

 I can see that this would absolutely make sense, but it would be quite some 
 effort to realize it. There are also various conceptul issues related to 
 XQuery Full Text: If you don't specify the language in the query, we'd need 
 to dynamically decide what stemmers to use for the query strings, depending 
 on the nodes that are currently targeted.
 This would pretty much blow up the existing architecture.

 As there are so many other types of index structures that could be helpful, 
 depending on the particular use case, we usually recommend users to create 
 additional BaseX databases, which can then serve as indexes. This can all 
 be done in XQuery. I remember there have been various examples for this on 
 this mailing list (see e.g. [1,2]).

 Hope this helps,
 Christian

 [1] 
 https://www.mail-archive.com/basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de/msg04837.html
 [2] 
 https://www.mail-archive.com/basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de/msg06089.html




 
 
 
  CREATE FULL-TEXT INDEX ON DATABASE XY STARTING WITH (
 
  (path_a)/LOCALIZED_PART_A[@LANG=$lang],
 
  (path_b)/LOCALIZED_PART_B[@LG=$lang],…
 
  ) FOR LANGUAGE $lang IN (
 
  BG,
 
  DN,
 
  DE WITH STOPWORDS filepath_de WITH STEM = YES,
 
  EN WITH STOPWORDS filepath_en,
 
  FR, …
 
  )  [USING language_code_map]
 
  and then to write full-text retrieval queries with a clause such as
  ‘FOR LANGUAGE BG’, for example. The index parts would be much smaller
  and full-text retrieval therefore much faster. The language codes
  would be mapped somehow to standard values recognized by BaseX in the
  language_code_map file.
 
  Are there any efforts towards such a feature?

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1

 iF4EAREIAAYFAlU4EIcACgkQDjE+CSbP7HrWyAEAsW698gwkbKrtEb9Vkv7S1aV/
 r5YyIp/UKv9k8gYxqboA/0+oesCxM6K2dZGEfIolUJG+x3vhxMfocY+QGpwjtLhy
 =Zq8Q
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [basex-talk] Best Forum for Generate XQuery How To Discussions?

2015-04-23 Thread Christian Grün
I would recommend this one:

  http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Stack Overflow is another popular alternative.


On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Eliot Kimber ekim...@contrext.com wrote:
 What is the best forum for asking general how-to XQuery questions that are
 not BaseX specific?

 Thanks,

 Eliot
 —
 Eliot Kimber, Owner
 Contrext, LLC
 http://contrext.com





[basex-talk] Best Forum for Generate XQuery How To Discussions?

2015-04-23 Thread Eliot Kimber
What is the best forum for asking general how-to XQuery questions that are
not BaseX specific?

Thanks,

Eliot
—
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com