Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
I see; you are talking about the DBA?
As the web interface may be located on another server, the XML parser will
fall to resolve the xinclude href reference (unless you specify an absolute
file path).
In that case, the better solution will certainly be to preprocess your data.
schrieb am Fr., 19. Feb. 2021, 08:57:
> Some good news,
>
> I managed to get the include working when adding the files (either the
> minimized ones or my own files) using a command line or the basexGUI.
>
> Unfortunately, i still have the error message when using the web interface
> (which is the only one I was using initially) and cannot figure out why.
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Christian Grün
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 18 février 2021 17:01
> *À :* pascaljoub...@gmail.com
> *Cc :* BaseX
> *Objet :* Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
>
>
>
> Nevertheless, I have strange warnings :
>
>
>
> Which of our distributions are you using? With the ZIP distribution, all
> libraries should be correctly added to the classpath.
>
>
>
> But I guess that won't solve your xinclude issue. Maybe you can find out
> more by comparing my minimized example with your setup.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/tagsoup.jar in
> /usr/share/java
> [warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate
> /usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar in /usr/share/java
> [warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/jing.jar in
> /usr/share/java
>
> Could that be the cause of my problems when adding files to the database ?
>
> Thanks for the other answers.
>
> Pascal
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christian Grün
> Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 11:11
> À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com
> Cc : BaseX
> Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> > My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i
> remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works
> on your side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have
> a look at that.
>
> Here’s a minimized test case on command line. Do you still get the same
> error for that one?
>
> doc.xml:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
>
>
>
> include.xml:
>
>
> Query:
> > basex "doc('doc.xml')"
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
>
>
>
> Ideally, the include should work no matter if fn:doc is called or if a new
> database is created (at least with OpenJDK).
>
> > One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when
> adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files
> (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed
> dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the
> xinclude operations again ?
>
> You’ll need to reload the file. The references will be fully resolved, and
> the file will get embedded in the mail file.
>
> > If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading
> into baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make
> a difference ?
>
> Absolutely. Or you can do everything in XQuery. Here’s one quick’n’dirty
> solution to achieve that:
>
> declare namespace xi = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude';
> declare option db:xinclude 'false';
>
> let $doc := doc('EV.xml') update {
> for $inc in .//xi:include
> let $id := replace($inc/@xpointer, '.*\(|\)', '')
> let $included-doc := doc($inc/@href)
> return replace node $inc with id($id, $included-doc) } return (
> $doc
> (: write to database...
> db:create('db', $doc, 'doc.xml') :)
> (: write back to file...
> file:write('doc.xml', $doc) :)
> )
>
> If you want to work with documents in the database, the doc() calls can
> e.g. be replaced with db:open('db', 'doc.xml') calls.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Christian
>
>
>
> On 2/17/21, pascaljoub...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> > Yes ideally I was hoping for the xpointer to work but I read in
> > previous posts that instead of a named element [element(EP15)], i
> > could use descendent path notation [element(1/2/1/1)] and that it
> > should work. That's not ideal but in my case, I think it will work
> > (all the files are structured in a very similar way).
> > https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-April/008607
> > .html My problem is that the referenced doc
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Some good news,
I managed to get the include working when adding the files (either the
minimized ones or my own files) using a command line or the basexGUI.
Unfortunately, i still have the error message when using the web interface
(which is the only one I was using initially) and cannot figure out why.
Pascal
De : Christian Grün
Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 17:01
À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com
Cc : BaseX
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Nevertheless, I have strange warnings :
Which of our distributions are you using? With the ZIP distribution, all
libraries should be correctly added to the classpath.
But I guess that won't solve your xinclude issue. Maybe you can find out more
by comparing my minimized example with your setup.
Cheers,
Christian
[warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/tagsoup.jar in
/usr/share/java
[warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar in
/usr/share/java
[warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/jing.jar in
/usr/share/java
Could that be the cause of my problems when adding files to the database ?
Thanks for the other answers.
Pascal
-Message d'origine-
De : Christian Grün mailto:christian.gr...@gmail.com> >
Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 11:11
À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com <mailto:pascaljoub...@gmail.com>
Cc : BaseX mailto:basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de> >
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Pascal,
> My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i remove
> the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works on your
> side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have a look at
> that.
Here’s a minimized test case on command line. Do you still get the same error
for that one?
doc.xml:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
include.xml:
Query:
> basex "doc('doc.xml')"
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
Ideally, the include should work no matter if fn:doc is called or if a new
database is created (at least with OpenJDK).
> One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when
> adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files
> (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed
> dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the
> xinclude operations again ?
You’ll need to reload the file. The references will be fully resolved, and the
file will get embedded in the mail file.
> If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading into
> baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make a
> difference ?
Absolutely. Or you can do everything in XQuery. Here’s one quick’n’dirty
solution to achieve that:
declare namespace xi = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude';
declare option db:xinclude 'false';
let $doc := doc('EV.xml') update {
for $inc in .//xi:include
let $id := replace($inc/@xpointer, '.*\(|\)', '')
let $included-doc := doc($inc/@href)
return replace node $inc with id($id, $included-doc) } return (
$doc
(: write to database...
db:create('db', $doc, 'doc.xml') :)
(: write back to file...
file:write('doc.xml', $doc) :)
)
If you want to work with documents in the database, the doc() calls can e.g. be
replaced with db:open('db', 'doc.xml') calls.
Hope this helps,
Christian
On 2/17/21, pascaljoub...@gmail.com <mailto:pascaljoub...@gmail.com>
mailto:pascaljoub...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> Yes ideally I was hoping for the xpointer to work but I read in
> previous posts that instead of a named element [element(EP15)], i
> could use descendent path notation [element(1/2/1/1)] and that it
> should work. That's not ideal but in my case, I think it will work
> (all the files are structured in a very similar way).
> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-April/008607
> .html My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at
> all if i remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error
> message). As it works on your side, I guess my baseX installation is
> not good. I think I'll have a look at that.
>
> One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude
> when adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the
> source files (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file
> be changed dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to
> baseX to perform the xinclude operations again ?
> If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading
> into baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
>
> Nevertheless, I have strange warnings :
>
Which of our distributions are you using? With the ZIP distribution, all
libraries should be correctly added to the classpath.
But I guess that won't solve your xinclude issue. Maybe you can find out
more by comparing my minimized example with your setup.
Cheers,
Christian
> [warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/tagsoup.jar in
> /usr/share/java
> [warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate
> /usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar in /usr/share/java
> [warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/jing.jar in
> /usr/share/java
>
> Could that be the cause of my problems when adding files to the database ?
>
> Thanks for the other answers.
>
> Pascal
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christian Grün
> Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 11:11
> À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com
> Cc : BaseX
> Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> > My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i
> remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works
> on your side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have
> a look at that.
>
> Here’s a minimized test case on command line. Do you still get the same
> error for that one?
>
> doc.xml:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
>
>
>
> include.xml:
>
>
> Query:
> > basex "doc('doc.xml')"
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
>
>
>
> Ideally, the include should work no matter if fn:doc is called or if a new
> database is created (at least with OpenJDK).
>
> > One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when
> adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files
> (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed
> dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the
> xinclude operations again ?
>
> You’ll need to reload the file. The references will be fully resolved, and
> the file will get embedded in the mail file.
>
> > If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading
> into baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make
> a difference ?
>
> Absolutely. Or you can do everything in XQuery. Here’s one quick’n’dirty
> solution to achieve that:
>
> declare namespace xi = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude';
> declare option db:xinclude 'false';
>
> let $doc := doc('EV.xml') update {
> for $inc in .//xi:include
> let $id := replace($inc/@xpointer, '.*\(|\)', '')
> let $included-doc := doc($inc/@href)
> return replace node $inc with id($id, $included-doc) } return (
> $doc
> (: write to database...
> db:create('db', $doc, 'doc.xml') :)
> (: write back to file...
> file:write('doc.xml', $doc) :)
> )
>
> If you want to work with documents in the database, the doc() calls can
> e.g. be replaced with db:open('db', 'doc.xml') calls.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Christian
>
>
>
> On 2/17/21, pascaljoub...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> > Yes ideally I was hoping for the xpointer to work but I read in
> > previous posts that instead of a named element [element(EP15)], i
> > could use descendent path notation [element(1/2/1/1)] and that it
> > should work. That's not ideal but in my case, I think it will work
> > (all the files are structured in a very similar way).
> > https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-April/008607
> > .html My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at
> > all if i remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error
> > message). As it works on your side, I guess my baseX installation is
> > not good. I think I'll have a look at that.
> >
> > One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude
> > when adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the
> > source files (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file
> > be changed dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to
> > baseX to perform the xinclude operations again ?
> > If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading
> > into baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it
> > make a difference ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Pascal
> >
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Christian Grün Envoyé : mercredi 17
> > février 2021 19:18 À : pascaljoub...@gmail.
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Thanks Christian,
> Here’s a minimized test case on command line. Do you still get the same error
> for that one?
Well this one works. And I've tried the same command with my files basex
"doc('EV.xml')" and the inclusion works too.
Nevertheless, I have strange warnings :
[warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/tagsoup.jar in
/usr/share/java
[warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/xml-resolver.jar in
/usr/share/java
[warning] /usr/bin/basex: Unable to locate /usr/share/java/jing.jar in
/usr/share/java
Could that be the cause of my problems when adding files to the database ?
Thanks for the other answers.
Pascal
-Message d'origine-
De : Christian Grün
Envoyé : jeudi 18 février 2021 11:11
À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com
Cc : BaseX
Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Pascal,
> My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i remove
> the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works on your
> side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have a look at
> that.
Here’s a minimized test case on command line. Do you still get the same error
for that one?
doc.xml:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
include.xml:
Query:
> basex "doc('doc.xml')"
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
Ideally, the include should work no matter if fn:doc is called or if a new
database is created (at least with OpenJDK).
> One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when
> adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files
> (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed
> dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the
> xinclude operations again ?
You’ll need to reload the file. The references will be fully resolved, and the
file will get embedded in the mail file.
> If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading into
> baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make a
> difference ?
Absolutely. Or you can do everything in XQuery. Here’s one quick’n’dirty
solution to achieve that:
declare namespace xi = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude';
declare option db:xinclude 'false';
let $doc := doc('EV.xml') update {
for $inc in .//xi:include
let $id := replace($inc/@xpointer, '.*\(|\)', '')
let $included-doc := doc($inc/@href)
return replace node $inc with id($id, $included-doc) } return (
$doc
(: write to database...
db:create('db', $doc, 'doc.xml') :)
(: write back to file...
file:write('doc.xml', $doc) :)
)
If you want to work with documents in the database, the doc() calls can e.g. be
replaced with db:open('db', 'doc.xml') calls.
Hope this helps,
Christian
On 2/17/21, pascaljoub...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> Yes ideally I was hoping for the xpointer to work but I read in
> previous posts that instead of a named element [element(EP15)], i
> could use descendent path notation [element(1/2/1/1)] and that it
> should work. That's not ideal but in my case, I think it will work
> (all the files are structured in a very similar way).
> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-April/008607
> .html My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at
> all if i remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error
> message). As it works on your side, I guess my baseX installation is
> not good. I think I'll have a look at that.
>
> One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude
> when adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the
> source files (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file
> be changed dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to
> baseX to perform the xinclude operations again ?
> If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading
> into baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it
> make a difference ?
>
> Thanks
> Pascal
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christian Grün Envoyé : mercredi 17
> février 2021 19:18 À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com Cc : BaseX
>
> Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> Thanks for the sample files. The error you reported is returned by
> Java’s default XML parser (the one from Xerces), so I guess we can’t
> resolve that easily unless the XPointer support is improved in a future
> version of Java.
> As you may have seen, the referenced document will be fully included
> if you remove the xpointer attribute, but that’s probably not wh
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Pascal,
> My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i remove
> the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works on your
> side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have a look at
> that.
Here’s a minimized test case on command line. Do you still get the
same error for that one?
doc.xml:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
include.xml:
Query:
> basex "doc('doc.xml')"
http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";>
Ideally, the include should work no matter if fn:doc is called or if a
new database is created (at least with OpenJDK).
> One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when
> adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files
> (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed
> dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the
> xinclude operations again ?
You’ll need to reload the file. The references will be fully resolved,
and the file will get embedded in the mail file.
> If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading into
> baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make a
> difference ?
Absolutely. Or you can do everything in XQuery. Here’s one
quick’n’dirty solution to achieve that:
declare namespace xi = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude';
declare option db:xinclude 'false';
let $doc := doc('EV.xml') update {
for $inc in .//xi:include
let $id := replace($inc/@xpointer, '.*\(|\)', '')
let $included-doc := doc($inc/@href)
return replace node $inc with id($id, $included-doc)
}
return (
$doc
(: write to database...
db:create('db', $doc, 'doc.xml') :)
(: write back to file...
file:write('doc.xml', $doc) :)
)
If you want to work with documents in the database, the doc() calls
can e.g. be replaced with db:open('db', 'doc.xml') calls.
Hope this helps,
Christian
On 2/17/21, pascaljoub...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> Yes ideally I was hoping for the xpointer to work but I read in previous
> posts that instead of a named element [element(EP15)], i could use
> descendent path notation [element(1/2/1/1)] and that it should work. That's
> not ideal but in my case, I think it will work (all the files are
> structured in a very similar way).
> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-April/008607.html
> My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i
> remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works
> on your side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have a
> look at that.
>
> One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when
> adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files
> (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed
> dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the
> xinclude operations again ?
> If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading into
> baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make a
> difference ?
>
> Thanks
> Pascal
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christian Grün
> Envoyé : mercredi 17 février 2021 19:18
> À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com
> Cc : BaseX
> Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> Thanks for the sample files. The error you reported is returned by Java’s
> default XML parser (the one from Xerces), so I guess we can’t resolve that
> easily unless the XPointer support is improved in a future version of Java.
> As you may have seen, the referenced document will be fully included if you
> remove the xpointer attribute, but that’s probably not what you need.
>
> Out of interest, I checked if Saxon can handle XPointer attributes. As it
> relies on the default parser as well, it returns the same error message as
> BaseX.
>
> I remember there have been previous posts on that issue; e.g here [1].
>
> Sorry for that!
> Christian
>
> [1]
> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-June/009021.html
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:03 AM Christian Grün
> wrote:
>>
>> > When I add the file into BaseX I now have the following message when
>> > adding the main file into BaseX.
>> >
>> > > An include with href 'EP15.xml'failed, and no fallback element was
>> > > found.
>>
>> Feel free to send us/me the files in question, I can have a look at that.
>
>
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Christian, Yes ideally I was hoping for the xpointer to work but I read in previous posts that instead of a named element [element(EP15)], i could use descendent path notation [element(1/2/1/1)] and that it should work. That's not ideal but in my case, I think it will work (all the files are structured in a very similar way). https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-April/008607.html My problem is that the referenced document IS NOT included at all if i remove the xpointer attribute (I have the same error message). As it works on your side, I guess my baseX installation is not good. I think I'll have a look at that. One more question : I understand that baseX "resolves" the xinclude when adding the file into the database. But later, if I change the source files (the ones I call from the main one), will the main file be changed dynamically ? or do I need to reload this main file to baseX to perform the xinclude operations again ? If answer 2, I guess I could just resolve the xinclude before loading into baseX (in a dedicated xsl) and load the result in baseX, would it make a difference ? Thanks Pascal -Message d'origine- De : Christian Grün Envoyé : mercredi 17 février 2021 19:18 À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com Cc : BaseX Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer Hi Pascal, Thanks for the sample files. The error you reported is returned by Java’s default XML parser (the one from Xerces), so I guess we can’t resolve that easily unless the XPointer support is improved in a future version of Java. As you may have seen, the referenced document will be fully included if you remove the xpointer attribute, but that’s probably not what you need. Out of interest, I checked if Saxon can handle XPointer attributes. As it relies on the default parser as well, it returns the same error message as BaseX. I remember there have been previous posts on that issue; e.g here [1]. Sorry for that! Christian [1] https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-June/009021.html On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:03 AM Christian Grün wrote: > > > When I add the file into BaseX I now have the following message when adding > > the main file into BaseX. > > > > > An include with href 'EP15.xml'failed, and no fallback element was found. > > Feel free to send us/me the files in question, I can have a look at that.
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Pascal, Thanks for the sample files. The error you reported is returned by Java’s default XML parser (the one from Xerces), so I guess we can’t resolve that easily unless the XPointer support is improved in a future version of Java. As you may have seen, the referenced document will be fully included if you remove the xpointer attribute, but that’s probably not what you need. Out of interest, I checked if Saxon can handle XPointer attributes. As it relies on the default parser as well, it returns the same error message as BaseX. I remember there have been previous posts on that issue; e.g here [1]. Sorry for that! Christian [1] https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/2015-June/009021.html On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:03 AM Christian Grün wrote: > > > When I add the file into BaseX I now have the following message when adding > > the main file into BaseX. > > > > > An include with href 'EP15.xml'failed, and no fallback element was found. > > Feel free to send us/me the files in question, I can have a look at that.
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
> When I add the file into BaseX I now have the following message when adding > the main file into BaseX. > > > An include with href 'EP15.xml'failed, and no fallback element was found. Feel free to send us/me the files in question, I can have a look at that.
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Christian, Thanks for your answer. Both files are in the same local directory when loading into BaseX. I've tried several things like removing the xpointer (to make sure it's not the problem) and the fallback scenario. When I add the file into BaseX I now have the following message when adding the main file into BaseX. > An include with href 'EP15.xml'failed, and no fallback element was found. I keep trying but cannot get it to work. Thanks for your help Pascal -Message d'origine- De : Christian Grün Envoyé : mardi 16 février 2021 11:00 À : pascaljoub...@gmail.com Cc : BaseX Objet : Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer Hi Pascal, Welcome to the list, thanks for your contribution. > Basically i have a main file which contains this xinclude instruction : > > xpointer="element(EP15)">Pièce non encodée pour le > moment. > > In my baseX database i have my main file and the EP15.xml file which contains > this instruction : The XINCLUDE option affects the behavior of the default Java XML parser, which will try to look up files in your local file system. This means you may need to ensure that EP15.xml is located in the same directory as your main file when add the latter one to the database. Does this help? Salutations cordiales, Christian
Re: [basex-talk] BaseX, xinclude and xpointer
Hi Pascal, Welcome to the list, thanks for your contribution. > Basically i have a main file which contains this xinclude instruction : > > Pièce > non encodée pour le moment. > > In my baseX database i have my main file and the EP15.xml file which contains > this instruction : The XINCLUDE option affects the behavior of the default Java XML parser, which will try to look up files in your local file system. This means you may need to ensure that EP15.xml is located in the same directory as your main file when add the latter one to the database. Does this help? Salutations cordiales, Christian
