Re: Master server offline

[Noel Butler]

Dave, You are missing the  "X" in the -zuka-rw-MailScanner: Found to be
clean line.
and it appears to not match the other X-zuka-RWMailScanner headers, this
may lead to problems, and no doubt if you --lint mailscanner it will
throw errors saying mismatch for SA.



On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:47 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:

> Please fix your mail scanner.  It is breaking the headers into two
> parts by inserting a blank line (see below).  This makes it very
> hard to reply to you.
> 
> X-zuka-RWMailScanner-Watermark: 1273807139.93...@anxgbaayeoqp7eoxtwe51g
> X-zuka-RWMailScanner-From: sub...@zuka.net
> 
> X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: A075B638001.ABE87
> X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
> 
> In message <4be38655.9070...@zuka.net>, Dave Filchak writes:
> > Well, my SOA Expires are set to 604800 (1 week ). Can I change those to 
> > four weeks to give us some time. We are dealing with a load of other 
> > stuff at the moment (small company). Is that allowed?
> > 
> > Dave
> 
> Normally you would just turn a slave into a master and have the other
> slaves transfer from it if there is going to be a extended delay.
>  
> Mark
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Master server offline

[Mark Andrews]

Please fix your mail scanner.  It is breaking the headers into two
parts by inserting a blank line (see below).  This makes it very
hard to reply to you.

X-zuka-RWMailScanner-Watermark: 1273807139.93...@anxgbaayeoqp7eoxtwe51g
X-zuka-RWMailScanner-From: sub...@zuka.net

X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: A075B638001.ABE87
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information

In message <4be38655.9070...@zuka.net>, Dave Filchak writes:
> Well, my SOA Expires are set to 604800 (1 week ). Can I change those to 
> four weeks to give us some time. We are dealing with a load of other 
> stuff at the moment (small company). Is that allowed?
> 
> Dave

Normally you would just turn a slave into a master and have the other
slaves transfer from it if there is going to be a extended delay.
 
Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Master server offline

[Barry Margolin]

In article ,
 Dave Filchak  wrote:

> I was thinking that as well ... would probably be the easiest and then 
> switch it back later. However, I would have to change my glue record at 
> the registrar as well ...  no?

The glue records don't distinguish between masters and slaves.

But it would be a good idea to remove a server from delegation if it's 
not going to respond.

> 
> On 06/05/10 11:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > In article,
> >   Bruce Ray  wrote:
> >
> >
> >> You have until the expiry counter expires for a given zone.
> >>
> >> We typically run our expiries at a week to allow for this type of failure.
> >>  
> > You can easily turn a slave into a master.  Just go into its named.conf
> > file, change "type slave" to "type master" and comment out the "masters
> > {...}" clause.
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> From: bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org
> >> 
> >> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> >> Sent: Thu May 06 21:37:35 2010
> >> Subject: Master server offline
> >>
> >> Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be
> >> offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I
> >> remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your 
> >> zones
> >> if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am I 
> >> just
> >> dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>  
> >

-- 
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Master server offline

[David Miller]

Secondaries need to 'know' that this old sec is now a master as well.

DNS is kind of critical (unless your internet presence is not important), so 
... Knowing nothing about you org... Would rec that you priortise fixing DNS 
pretty highly.


--
-___
David Miller
Tiggee LLC
dmil...@tiggee.com
On May 6, 2010 23:23, Barry Margolin  wrote: 

In article ,

 Bruce Ray  wrote:



> You have until the expiry counter expires for a given zone.

> 

> We typically run our expiries at a week to allow for this type of failure.



You can easily turn a slave into a master.  Just go into its named.conf 

file, change "type slave" to "type master" and comment out the "masters 

{...}" clause.



> 

> 

> From: bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org 

> 

> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org 

> Sent: Thu May 06 21:37:35 2010

> Subject: Master server offline

> 

> Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be 

> offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I 

> remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your 
zones 

> if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am I 
just 

> dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?

> 

> Cheers,

> 

> Dave



-- 

Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu

Arlington, MA

*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***

___

bind-users mailing list

bind-users@lists.isc.org

https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

[no subject]

[bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive . com]

X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 063F2638001.AC137
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063F2638001
for ; Thu,  6 May 2010 23:23:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be38761.9080...@zuka.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 23:22:09 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Master server offline
References: 

In-Reply-To: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List 
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===8099937040315822544=="
Sender: bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.isc.org
Errors-To: bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.isc.org
X-pstn-neptune: 1/1/1.00/81
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===8099937040315822544==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="080001040208080201060908"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--080001040208080201060908
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I was thinking that as well ... would probably be the easiest and then 
switch it back later. However, I would have to change my glue record at 
the registrar as well ...  no?

On 06/05/10 11:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article,
>   Bruce Ray  wrote:
>
>
>> You have until the expiry counter expires for a given zone.
>>
>> We typically run our expiries at a week to allow for this type of failure.
>>  
> You can easily turn a slave into a master.  Just go into its named.conf
> file, change "type slave" to "type master" and comment out the "masters
> {...}" clause.
>
>
>> 
>> From: bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org
>> 
>> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> Sent: Thu May 06 21:37:35 2010
>> Subject: Master server offline
>>
>> Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be
>> offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I
>> remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your zones
>> if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am I just
>> dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave
>>  
>

--080001040208080201060908
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




  


I was thinking that as well
... would probably be the easiest and then switch it back later.
However, I would have to change my glue record at the registrar as well
...  no?

On 06/05/10 11:19 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:

  In article mailto:mailman.1415.1273200624.21153.bind-us...@lists.isc.org";>,
 Bruce Ray mailto:bruce@zionsbancorp.com";> 
wrote:

  
  
You have until the expiry counter expires for a given zone.

We typically run our expiries at a week to allow for this type of failure.

  
  
You can easily turn a slave into a master.  Just go into its named.conf 
file, change "type slave" to "type master" and comment out the "masters 
{...}" clause.

  
  


From: mailto:bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org";>bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org
 
mailto:bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org";>
To: mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org";>bind-users@lists.isc.org mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org";>
Sent: Thu May 06 21:37:35 2010
Subject: Master server offline

Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be 
offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I 

Re: Master server offline

[Barry Margolin]

In article ,
 Bruce Ray  wrote:

> You have until the expiry counter expires for a given zone.
> 
> We typically run our expiries at a week to allow for this type of failure.

You can easily turn a slave into a master.  Just go into its named.conf 
file, change "type slave" to "type master" and comment out the "masters 
{...}" clause.

> 
> 
> From: bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org 
> 
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org 
> Sent: Thu May 06 21:37:35 2010
> Subject: Master server offline
> 
> Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be 
> offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I 
> remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your zones 
> if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am I just 
> dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave

-- 
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

[no subject]

[bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive . com]

X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: A075B638001.ABE87
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A075B638001
for ; Thu,  6 May 2010 23:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be38655.9070...@zuka.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 23:17:41 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Master server offline
References: <4be37cef.7010...@zuka.net> <1273200836.7996.11.ca...@tardis>
In-Reply-To: <1273200836.7996.11.ca...@tardis>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List 
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===3266933940258959469=="
Sender: bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.isc.org
Errors-To: bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.isc.org
X-pstn-neptune: 3/1/0.33/53
X-pstn-levels: (S:96.30511/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===3266933940258959469==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="010206060103000502050300"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--010206060103000502050300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Well, my SOA Expires are set to 604800 (1 week ). Can I change those to 
four weeks to give us some time. We are dealing with a load of other 
stuff at the moment (small company). Is that allowed?

Dave

On 06/05/10 10:53 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 22:37 -0400, Dave Filchak wrote:
>> Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will 
>> be offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought 
>> I remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for 
>> your zones if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything 
>> to this or am I just dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer 
>> request, we should be ok?
>>
>
> Depends on your SOA expire timeout, most use 4 weeks, IIRC a slave 
> will cease to serve if it can't get an update after then.
> But, if you can not replace a server within 4 weeks, your organisation 
> has much bigger problems.
>
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* , and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

--010206060103000502050300
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




  


Well, my SOA Expires are set
to 604800 (1 week ). Can I change those to four weeks to give us some
time. We are dealing with a load of other stuff at the moment (small
company). Is that allowed?

Dave

On 06/05/10 10:53 PM, Noel Butler wrote:

  
  
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 22:37 -0400, Dave Filchak wrote:
   Our master server machine had a drive
failure and looks like it will be offline for some time. Somewhere in
the back of my mind, I thought I remembered that something bad can
happen to the dns resolution for your zones if the master is offline
for too long. Is there anything to this or am I just dreaming? As long
as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?

  
  
Depends on your SOA expire timeout, most use 4 weeks, IIRC a slave will
cease to serve if it can't get an update after then.
But, if you can not replace a server within 4 weeks, your organisation
has much bigger problems.
  
  
  
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
  
dangerous content by
  http://www.mailscanner.info/";>MailScanner,
and is
  
believed to be clean.
  

___
bind-users mailing list
mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org";>bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users";>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/list

Re: Master server offline

[Noel Butler]

On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 22:37 -0400, Dave Filchak wrote:

> Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will
> be offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought
> I remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for
> your zones if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to
> this or am I just dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer
> request, we should be ok?
> 


Depends on your SOA expire timeout, most use 4 weeks, IIRC a slave will
cease to serve if it can't get an update after then.
But, if you can not replace a server within 4 weeks, your organisation
has much bigger problems.


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Master server offline

[Ben Croswell]

If your secondaries can't reach the primary for the period of time you have
in your SOAs for refresh the secondaries wills top answering.

-- 
-Ben Croswell

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Dave Filchak  wrote:

>  Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be
> offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I
> remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your
> zones if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am
> I just dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be
> ok?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Master server offline

[Ben Croswell]

Actually speaking without thinking is bad.
It's the expire timer in the SOA not the refresh.



On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Dave Filchak  wrote:

>  Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be
> offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I
> remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your
> zones if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am
> I just dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be
> ok?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> ___
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>



-- 
-Ben Croswell
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Master server offline

[Bruce Ray]

You have until the expiry counter expires for a given zone.

We typically run our expiries at a week to allow for this type of failure.


From: bind-users-bounces+bruce.ray=zionsbancorp@lists.isc.org 

To: bind-users@lists.isc.org 
Sent: Thu May 06 21:37:35 2010
Subject: Master server offline

Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be offline 
for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I remembered that 
something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your zones if the master is 
offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am I just dreaming? As long 
as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?

Cheers,

Dave
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

[no subject]

[bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive . com]

X-zuka-RWMailScanner-ID: 57AA9638001.AE218
X-zuka-rw-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Received: from Magnolia.local (unknown [70.48.209.168])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: dave.filc...@zuka.net)
by rosewood.zuka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AA9638001
for ; Thu,  6 May 2010 22:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4be37cef.7010...@zuka.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 22:37:35 -0400
From: Dave Filchak 
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Master server offline
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mx.pao1.isc.org
X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List 
List-Unsubscribe: ,

List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: ,

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===7572640330274276018=="
Sender: bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.isc.org
Errors-To: bind-users-bounces+archive=mail-archive@lists.isc.org
X-pstn-neptune: 2/1/0.50/62
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.9/99.9 CV:99.9000 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 
R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 )
X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from  [294/10] 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===7572640330274276018==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="070103030402040003010504"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--070103030402040003010504
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Our master server machine had a drive failure and looks like it will be 
offline for some time. Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I 
remembered that something bad can happen to the dns resolution for your 
zones if the master is offline for too long. Is there anything to this 
or am I just dreaming? As long as the secondary can answer request, we 
should be ok?

Cheers,

Dave

--070103030402040003010504
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit








Our master server machine had
a drive failure and looks like it will be offline for some time.
Somewhere in the back of my mind, I thought I remembered that something
bad can happen to the dns resolution for your zones if the master is
offline for too long. Is there anything to this or am I just dreaming?
As long as the secondary can answer request, we should be ok?

Cheers,

Dave




--070103030402040003010504--

--===7572640330274276018==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--===7572640330274276018==--

Re: ftp.isc.org is down

[Mark Andrews]

There was a fibre cut in the Bay area.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

lwresd library and lwresd daemon - connection problem

[nati shauli]

Hi,


I integrated the lwresd library files into my software which in the end runs as 
a process side by side with the lwresd daemon on the same machine.

I send gethostbyname messages from my process to lwresd daemon. 
When I start the lwresd daemon to run with its

defaults (/sbin/lwresd &), it reads resov.conf, and when it gets my 
gethostbyname message, it sends a dns request to one of the external servers 
and responses to
my request with the right address. but when I start the lwresd daemon
with my lwresd.conf (/sbin/lwresd -c /etc/lwresd -g -d 100 &),
I can see that it gets my gethostbyname message but it seems that it
doesn't search it's own database, which was built according to lwresd.conf and
zone files.

This is the lwresd log after getting a gethostbyname request from my process:




Code:
r...@crescendo:~# 05-May-2010 08:14:33.399 socket 0xb7cec008: 
dispatch_recv:  event 0xb7cd93c8 -> task 0xb7cd4428
05-May-2010 08:14:33.399 socket 0xb7cec008: internal_recv: task 0xb7cd4428 got 
event 0xb7cec068
05-May-2010 08:14:33.399 socket 0xb7cec008 127.0.0.1#32768: packet received 
correctly
05-May-2010 08:14:33.399 socket 0xb7cec008: processing cmsg 0xb7cc10b0
05-May-2010 08:14:33.399 client 127.0.0.1#32768: UDP request
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client 127.0.0.1#32768: error
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client 127.0.0.1#32768: send
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client 127.0.0.1#32768: sendto
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client 127.0.0.1#32768: senddone
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client 127.0.0.1#32768: next
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client 127.0.0.1#32768: endrequest
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 client @0xb7ced008: udprecv
05-May-2010 08:14:33.400 socket 0xb7cec008: socket_recv: event 0xb7cd93c8 -> 
task 0xb7cd4428


all I want is to run a local lwresd which builds its own database from
lwresd.conf and zone files and searches its own db only without
contacting any external dns server, but for some reason it doesn't work.



I verified that lwresd daemon reads lwresd.conf and zone files. I also run 
checkconf and checkzones.



Any idea what could be the problem?

Thanks,
Nati


















  ___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: ftp.isc.org back up

[Peter Laws]

On 05/06/10 13:27, Lightner, Jeff wrote:

They can't fool us - we know it was caused by the J server DNSSEC issue.



Damn that DNSSEC!!!  :-D

--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
---
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, cra...@ou.edu. Thank you!
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: ftp.isc.org back up

[Lightner, Jeff]

They can't fool us - we know it was caused by the J server DNSSEC issue.

:-)

-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
Of Jack Tavares
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:17 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: ftp.isc.org back up

from isc.org:
> 
> ISC experienced a fiber outage this morning that affected some of our
> services.  It has now been fixed and you should be able to reach all
of
> the download servers.

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
 
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential 
information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of 
the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the 
sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
--
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

ftp.isc.org back up

[Jack Tavares]

from isc.org:
> 
> ISC experienced a fiber outage this morning that affected some of our
> services.  It has now been fixed and you should be able to reach all of
> the download servers.

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: ftp.isc.org is down

[Don Krause]

> Not quite the right place to report this but…
>  
> wget http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
> --2010-05-06 10:53:30--  
> http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
> Resolving ftp.isc.org... 204.152.184.110, 2001:4f8:0:2::18
> Connecting to ftp.isc.org|204.152.184.110|:80... failed: Connection refused.
> Connecting to ftp.isc.org|2001:4f8:0:2::18|:80... failed: Network is 
> unreachable.
> [tava...@seapddev01 isc.org]$
>  
> I have tried it from 3 different locations, 2 on the US west coast, one on 
> the US
> east coast.


It works for me, 11:05am PST, left coast.

Not sure if that's helpful though...

Would you like me to send you the file?
--
Don Krause   
Head Systems Geek, 
Waver of Deceased Chickens.
Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc.
P.O. Box 608
Loma Linda, California 92354
909.799.8327 Tel
909.799.8366 Fax
dkra...@optivus.com
www.optivus.com
"This message represents the official view of the voices in my head."






___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: ftp.isc.org is down

[Jack Tavares]

And it is back now.
wget http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
--2010-05-06 11:06:48--  
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
Resolving ftp.isc.org... 204.152.184.110, 2001:4f8:0:2::18
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|204.152.184.110|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 7125947 (6.8M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz'

100%[==>] 7,125,947   
1.26M/s   in 6.0s

2010-05-06 11:06:55 (1.14 MB/s) - `bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz' saved [7125947/7125947]



From: Jack Tavares
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:07 AM
To: Jack Tavares; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: ftp.isc.org is down

 Acouple people have pointed out that I am attempting to connect to 
ftp.isc.org
using http.

That is so, but that is what happens if you use the download links on 
www.isc.org
if you click on the web 
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/970-p1/download/bind-970-p1targz
it attempts to download from
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz

Which sits and spins and then times out.
So I decided to try it on the command line using wget and the same URL that
the webpage uses.
It fails.
I also tried the command
ftp ftp.isc.org
also fails




From: bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org 
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jack 
Tavares
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:55 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: ftp.isc.org is down

Not quite the right place to report this but...

wget http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
--2010-05-06 10:53:30--  
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
Resolving ftp.isc.org... 204.152.184.110, 2001:4f8:0:2::18
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|204.152.184.110|:80... failed: Connection refused.
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|2001:4f8:0:2::18|:80... failed: Network is 
unreachable.
[tava...@seapddev01 isc.org]$

I have tried it from 3 different locations, 2 on the US west coast, one on the 
US
east coast.


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: ftp.isc.org is down

[Jack Tavares]

 Acouple people have pointed out that I am attempting to connect to 
ftp.isc.org
using http.

That is so, but that is what happens if you use the download links on 
www.isc.org
if you click on the web 
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/970-p1/download/bind-970-p1targz
it attempts to download from
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz

Which sits and spins and then times out.
So I decided to try it on the command line using wget and the same URL that
the webpage uses.
It fails.
I also tried the command
ftp ftp.isc.org
also fails




From: bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org 
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+j.tavares=f5@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jack 
Tavares
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:55 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: ftp.isc.org is down

Not quite the right place to report this but...

wget http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
--2010-05-06 10:53:30--  
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
Resolving ftp.isc.org... 204.152.184.110, 2001:4f8:0:2::18
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|204.152.184.110|:80... failed: Connection refused.
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|2001:4f8:0:2::18|:80... failed: Network is 
unreachable.
[tava...@seapddev01 isc.org]$

I have tried it from 3 different locations, 2 on the US west coast, one on the 
US
east coast.


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

ftp.isc.org is down

[Jack Tavares]

Not quite the right place to report this but...

wget http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
--2010-05-06 10:53:30--  
http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.0-P1/bind-9.7.0-P1.tar.gz
Resolving ftp.isc.org... 204.152.184.110, 2001:4f8:0:2::18
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|204.152.184.110|:80... failed: Connection refused.
Connecting to ftp.isc.org|2001:4f8:0:2::18|:80... failed: Network is 
unreachable.
[tava...@seapddev01 isc.org]$

I have tried it from 3 different locations, 2 on the US west coast, one on the 
US
east coast.


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: help on NESC3PARAM

[Stephane Bortzmeyer]

On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 02:25:45PM +0530,
 rams  wrote 
 a message of 36 lines which said:

> How to sign  a zone for getting  NSEC3, NSEC3PARAM RR's in a signed zone.

Regarding this question and your previous one, it may be a good idea
to start reading the documentation:

-3 salt
  Generate a NSEC3 chain with the given hex encoded salt. A dash 
(salt) can be used to
  indicate that no salt is to be used when generating the NSEC3 
chain.

   -H iterations
  When generating a NSEC3 chain use this many interations. The 
default is 100.

   -A When generating a NSEC3 chain set the OPTOUT flag on all NSEC3 
records and do not
  generate NSEC3 records for insecure delegations.

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

help on NESC3PARAM

[rams]

HI ,
How to sign  a zone for getting  NSEC3, NSEC3PARAM RR's in a signed zone.

Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users