Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications
On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 10:40 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Armin K. wrote: On 07/26/2014 04:12 PM, Christopher Gregory wrote: My general rule of thumb is to use 'less than' if it is 0.799 sbu or less and round up to '0.1' if it's greater. You could make a case for a different number though. -- Bruce In my case the sbu value was calculated as: .056 Which is why I thought to change the value to less than 0.1. I just want to get things correct, because if my SBU calculations are wrong it means that I have to correct the script and go through and calculate all the values I have done again correctly, and change the pages accordingly. Regards, Christopher. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 16:43:23 +0100 From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:40:37 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications . . + !ENTITY bogofilter-time less than 0.1 SBU . . you add configure time there, I guess it's reasonable to use 0.1 SBU instead of less than. My general rule of thumb is to use 'less than' if it is 0.799 sbu or s/0.799/0.0799/ ? less and round up to '0.1' if it's greater. You could make a case for a - or s/0.1/1/ ? different number though. -- Bruce -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications
akhiezer wrote: Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:40:37 -0500 From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com To: BLFS Development List blfs-dev@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications . . + !ENTITY bogofilter-time less than 0.1 SBU . . you add configure time there, I guess it's reasonable to use 0.1 SBU instead of less than. My general rule of thumb is to use 'less than' if it is 0.799 sbu or s/0.799/0.0799/ ? Yes. Well actually 0.079 as I have my scripts set to print only 3 significant digits. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13663 - branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications
On 07/26/2014 01:46 PM, c...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: cjg Date: Sat Jul 26 04:46:29 2014 New Revision: 13663 Log: updated stats on bogofilter page. Modified: branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications/bogofilter.xml Modified: branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications/bogofilter.xml == --- branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications/bogofilter.xmlSat Jul 26 03:58:49 2014(r13662) +++ branches/systemd/gnome-systemd/applications/bogofilter.xmlSat Jul 26 04:46:29 2014(r13663) @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ !ENTITY bogofilter-download-ftp !ENTITY bogofilter-md5sum6ce27a692d2d4881e9898f3798dcf91c !ENTITY bogofilter-size 1.9 MB - !ENTITY bogofilter-buildsize 40 MB - !ENTITY bogofilter-time 0.5 SBU + !ENTITY bogofilter-buildsize 14 MB + !ENTITY bogofilter-time less than 0.1 SBU ] Either your SBU stats are broken or something else is going on. It takes at least 40 seconds to build the package with make -j4 where SBU is something little over 1:30. sect1 id=bogofilter xreflabel=Bogofilter-bogofilter-version; -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
