Re: [blfs-support] blfs systemd fails
On 12/04/2018 10:52 μμ, spiky wrote: On 12/04/18 19:38, Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 12/04/2018 09:01 μμ, spiky wrote: Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied" ../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric constant #define MS_MOVE 8192 ../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’? uint64_t flags = MS_REC; I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's from lfs systemd which it finished to build. Is the issue because I,m building "chroot", dont think thats a problem On the following mail http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-April/034328.html I sent an updated patch which included the header's fixes by the LFS-systemd book, and Bruce replied that committed that. Not sure what happened. I dont have either libgpg or libgcrypt installed, so the error not related to them If you apply the patch attached to the above mail, the sed commands by the LFS-book are not needed. -- Thanos -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] blfs systemd fails
On 12/04/18 19:38, Thanos Baloukas wrote: On 12/04/2018 09:01 μμ, spiky wrote: Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied" ../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric constant #define MS_MOVE 8192 ../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’? uint64_t flags = MS_REC; I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's from lfs systemd which it finished to build. Is the issue because I,m building "chroot", dont think thats a problem On the following mail http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-April/034328.html I sent an updated patch which included the header's fixes by the LFS-systemd book, and Bruce replied that committed that. Not sure what happened. I dont have either libgpg or libgcrypt installed, so the error not related to them -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] blfs systemd fails
On 12/04/2018 09:01 μμ, spiky wrote: Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied" ../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric constant #define MS_MOVE 8192 ../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’? uint64_t flags = MS_REC; I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's from lfs systemd which it finished to build. Is the issue because I,m building "chroot", dont think thats a problem On the following mail http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-April/034328.html I sent an updated patch which included the header's fixes by the LFS-systemd book, and Bruce replied that committed that. Not sure what happened. -- Thanos -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] blfs systemd fails
Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied" ../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric constant #define MS_MOVE 8192 ../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’? uint64_t flags = MS_REC; I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's from lfs systemd which it finished to build. Is the issue because I,m building "chroot", dont think thats a problem -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] Blfs svn systemd patch named wrong
On 04/12/2018 11:28 AM, spiky wrote: As the subject sayes wget will give this patch systemd-238-upstream_fixes-1.patch the book command systemd-238-upstream_fixes.patch-1 It should be the first of course. I just fixed the book. Thanks. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-support] Blfs svn systemd patch named wrong
As the subject sayes wget will give this patch systemd-238-upstream_fixes-1.patch the book command systemd-238-upstream_fixes.patch-1 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
