Good point. Flow isolation gives some kind of “privacy”.
But I guess this is not the worse privacy violation one would be concerned
about in today Internet.
On Thu 19 Jul 2018 at 12:52, Dave Taht wrote:
> hahaha. Aside from their last slide not recommending fq, that was an
> enjoyable read. fq in this case (but I would deprioritize ping
> responses slightly in the general case) makes the actual observed load
> even more invisible.
>
> I think traceroute would have been a better tool for this study.
>
> and smokeping remains a very useful tool for those that can deploy it.
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:44 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> wrote:
> >
> > This was presented at today's maprg session at the IETF:
> >
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-maprg-is-bufferbloat-a-privacy-issue-brian-trammell-00
> >
> > -Toke
> > ___
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dave Täht
> CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-669-226-2619
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
