[board-discuss] Drafting job posting for "QA analyst"

[Xisco Fauli]

Hello,

one of the approved [1] contracts is

  QA analyst

The board would like to work together in public with all of you on this 
job posting before it gets officially published. The current draft is 
therefore shared at


https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/PsGnyGHBXmjzmqB

The board is happy to get your feedback and proposals. We'd like to 
discuss this ideally in the board call on Monday, May 30, at 1800 Berlin 
time. Please send your feedback to the public 
board-discuss@documentfoundation.org mailing list.


Looking forward to your feedback,

Xisco

[1] 
https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00400.html 



--
Xisco Faulí
LibreOffice QA Team
IRC: x1sc0


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Re: [board-discuss] Drafting job posting for "part-time web technology expert"

[Ilmari Lauhakangas]

I guess it could be added as a nice-to-have. In the task list, there is 
the entry:

"Take care of localisation needs and accessibility requirements"

I keep accessibility in mind when making changes or building something 
from scratch. Recently I made an SEO overview of many of our sites and 
it included some quick accessibility tester results. You can direct 
feedback about web page accessibility to me.


Ilmari

On 11.5.2022 14.08, Simon Phipps wrote:

Hi!

I have been chatting on Mastodon with a blind user who has feedback 
about the choices made in the web design and the resulting ease of 
access of the web pages using a screen reader (tl;dr: they think there 
are easy improvements possible). It would be excellent if the new hire 
had experience consulting with and designing for users with 
disabilities. Perhaps this preference could be added to the 
"Skills" section of the job description?


Cheers

Simon

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:49 AM Ilmari Lauhakangas 
> wrote:


Hello,

one of the approved [1] contracts is

        part-time web technology expert

The board would like to work together in public with all of you on this
job posting before it gets officially published. The current draft is
therefore shared at

https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/CSzrtsKJt4GKY7P


The board is happy to get your feedback and proposals. We'd like to
discuss this ideally in the board call on Monday, May 30, at 1800
Berlin
time. Please send your feedback to the public
board-discuss@documentfoundation.org
 mailing list.

Looking forward to your feedback,

Ilmari

[1]

https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00400.html





--
*Simon Phipps*,/// Trustee, /The Document Foundation



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Re: [board-discuss] Drafting job posting for "part-time web technology expert"

[Simon Phipps]

Hi!

I have been chatting on Mastodon with a blind user who has feedback about
the choices made in the web design and the resulting ease of access of the
web pages using a screen reader (tl;dr: they think there are easy
improvements possible). It would be excellent if the new hire had
experience consulting with and designing for users with disabilities.
Perhaps this preference could be added to the "Skills" section of the job
description?

Cheers

Simon

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:49 AM Ilmari Lauhakangas <
ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> one of the approved [1] contracts is
>
>part-time web technology expert
>
> The board would like to work together in public with all of you on this
> job posting before it gets officially published. The current draft is
> therefore shared at
>
> https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/CSzrtsKJt4GKY7P
>
> The board is happy to get your feedback and proposals. We'd like to
> discuss this ideally in the board call on Monday, May 30, at 1800 Berlin
> time. Please send your feedback to the public
> board-discuss@documentfoundation.org mailing list.
>
> Looking forward to your feedback,
>
> Ilmari
>
> [1]
>
> https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00400.html
>
>

-- 
*Simon Phipps*, * Trustee, *The Document Foundation

[board-discuss] Drafting job posting for "part-time web technology expert"

[Ilmari Lauhakangas]

Hello,

one of the approved [1] contracts is

  part-time web technology expert

The board would like to work together in public with all of you on this 
job posting before it gets officially published. The current draft is 
therefore shared at


https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/CSzrtsKJt4GKY7P

The board is happy to get your feedback and proposals. We'd like to 
discuss this ideally in the board call on Monday, May 30, at 1800 Berlin 
time. Please send your feedback to the public 
board-discuss@documentfoundation.org mailing list.


Looking forward to your feedback,

Ilmari

[1] 
https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00400.html


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

[board-discuss] Re: Drafting Tender "Improve the accessibility checker for PDF/UA"

[Heiko Tietze]

I wonder why the other tickets from META bug 139007 are excluded (btw, 
there is kind of duplicate META bug 101912 with a lot more). Bug 149000 
is on hold since you asked UX for input (personally I think Print is 
over-engineering in respect to the workflow). Bug 148971 about the 
non-modal window could also be handled per sidebar deck, which I prefer 
over the modality tweak. An alternative is to insert the issues as 
annotations/comments in the document. On one ticket we discussed the 
help on each issue, could be an infobutton (question mark icon) that 
shows a dialog why this tag is needed and what to do. Three weeks seems 
underestimated if we expect to solve all issues.


Looking at the current UI, I think a bit design work could be 
beneficial. Some issues are rather warnings (eg. Avoid Footnotes) other 
are mandatory (No Alt Text). Perhaps we copy the SEO plugin look and 
feel - or was it the readability checker? - from Wordpress.


As reviewers we could invite Christophe Strobbe who comments a lot on 
these tickets and there was a lady in the German community call last 
year... don't remember her name.


PS: Cannot comment on the NC document.

On 10.05.22 17:36, Olivier Hallot wrote:

Hello,

one of the approved [1] tenders is the

  Improve the accessibility checker for PDF/UA

The board would like to work together in public with all of you on 
this tender before it gets officially published. The current draft is 
therefore shared at


https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/WE6tsYjAZietK9q

The board is happy to get your feedback and proposals. We'd like to 
discuss this ideally in the board call on Monday, May 16, at 1800 
Berlin time. Please send your feedback to the public 
board-discuss@documentfoundation.org mailing list. Thanks a lot to all 
community members involved for working on the tender draft!


Looking forward to your feedback,

Olivier

[1] 
https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00400.html


OpenPGP_0xA68C0CA5EEA5F466.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature