Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-07-04 Thread Bernhard Dippold

Hi Drew, all

Just short:

I fully agree that the question of defining the LibreOffice teams and
dedicated parts of the community is important.

Only after this definition the question about dedicated logos should be
posed.

Even if I'll probably not be able contribute much to the thread, I
welcome your interest in this discussion.

In my first mail to this thread I already included some proposals how to
look at the different teams and groups. Just leave the logo parts out of
the quote:

I wrote:


A) ... officially supported LibreOffice teams
(defined by dedicated TDF resources like
http://team.libreoffice.org website or team@libreoffice.org
mailing list) ...

B) ... LibreOffice conference ... similar to A), even if the
conference team might not be given a website or mailing lists with
the names mentioned in A).

C) ... regional marketing teams ...  are officially approved by TDF
and provided with team@marketing.libreoffice.org mailing lists ...

D) Individual community members (approved by the Membership
Committee) ...  not allowed
... to behave like an official LibreOffice or TDF spokesperson
or representative.

E) Local teams based on individual community members or supporters
not being approved as community members by the MC ...



Perhaps you can use some of my ideas here..


drew schrieb:

...  so speaking
for myself I would make time this coming week to actively engage
in a discussion and work on putting a draft together on the wiki
with what comes out of such a discussion.


Thank you very much for this offer, unfortunately my time is much more 
restricted than I thought some time ago...


Best regards

Bernhard

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-07-01 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi,

Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-07-01 00.35:
 I tried to find a time-slot yesterday, but had no chance...
 
 Perhaps it will be possible next Saturday (9th of July).
 
 When I'll be able to see my schedule more clearer, I'll add the point to
 the agenda.

ok, thanks a lot!

Florian

-- 
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-07-01 Thread drew
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 00:35 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
 Hi Florian, all
 
 Florian Effenberger schrieb:
  Hi Bernhard,
 
  Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-06-10 00.25:
  There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC
  discussion or decision on this topic.
 
  As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions
  (definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external groups) I
  don't think that this decision should be left to any of the teams like
  marketing or design.

Hi Bernhard,

I agree - but why kick it to the SC - why not start the discussion on
the general discussion list and lets work out what it would mean to be a
local team - what general rules folks would want in place, what
responsibilities and requirements would be expected and the like.

IMO right now any decision about a logo policy is premature, whether it
is by your team, marketing or the SC, on this particular point - as
there is still no definition of what a local team is, what it can and
can not do. The use of a custom logo is only one piece of that.

I know that there never seems to be enough time for these kinds of
discussions, but that is never going to change - so speaking for myself
I would make time this coming week to actively engage in a discussion
and work on putting a draft together on the wiki with what comes out of
such a discussion.

It's also obvious that the clock is ticking on this issue, the folks in
Paraguay are off and running from what I can see, folks (or folk) in
Venezuela are eager to get going, the German team has always been in
place and dominates here

I'm really concerned that if only a logo use policy is put in place
there is a chance for continued problems from misunderstanding what the
use of such a logo will imply.

Then afterwards that draft could be presented to the SC for adoption.

snip

Thanks,

//drew


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-07-01 Thread drew
Sorry guys that was supposed to be a draft - not a send...

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:24 -0400, drew wrote:
 On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 00:35 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
  Hi Florian, all
  
  Florian Effenberger schrieb:
   Hi Bernhard,
  
   Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-06-10 00.25:
   There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC
   discussion or decision on this topic.
  
   As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions
   (definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external groups) I
   don't think that this decision should be left to any of the teams like
   marketing or design.
 
 Hi Bernhard,
 
 I agree - but why kick it to the SC - why not start the discussion on
 the general discussion list and lets work out what it would mean to be a
 local team - what general rules folks would want in place, what
 responsibilities and requirements would be expected and the like.
 
 IMO right now any decision about a logo policy is premature, whether it
 is by your team, marketing or the SC, on this particular point - as
 there is still no definition of what a local team is, what it can and
 can not do. The use of a custom logo is only one piece of that.
 
 I know that there never seems to be enough time for these kinds of
 discussions, but that is never going to change - so speaking for myself
 I would make time this coming week to actively engage in a discussion
 and work on putting a draft together on the wiki with what comes out of
 such a discussion.
 
 It's also obvious that the clock is ticking on this issue, the folks in
 Paraguay are off and running from what I can see, folks (or folk) in
 Venezuela are eager to get going, the German team has always been in
 place and dominates here
 
 I'm really concerned that if only a logo use policy is put in place
 there is a chance for continued problems from misunderstanding what the
 use of such a logo will imply.
 
 Then afterwards that draft could be presented to the SC for adoption.
 
 snip
 
 Thanks,
 
 //drew
 
 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-07-01 Thread drew
So the finished email follows:

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:35 -0400, drew wrote:
 Sorry guys that was supposed to be a draft - not a send...
 
 On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:24 -0400, drew wrote:
  On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 00:35 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
   Hi Florian, all
   
   Florian Effenberger schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
   
Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-06-10 00.25:
There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC
discussion or decision on this topic.
   
As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions
(definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external groups) I
don't think that this decision should be left to any of the teams like
marketing or design.
  
  Hi Bernhard,
  
  I agree - but why kick it to the SC - why not start the discussion on
  the general discussion list and lets work out what it would mean to be a
  local team - what general rules folks would want in place, what
  responsibilities and requirements would be expected and the like.
  
  IMO right now any decision about a logo policy is premature, whether it
  is by your team, marketing or the SC, on this particular point - as
  there is still no definition of what a local team is, what it can and
  can not do. The use of a custom logo is only one piece of that.
  
  I know that there never seems to be enough time for these kinds of
  discussions, but that is never going to change - so speaking for myself
  I would make time this coming week to actively engage in a discussion
  and work on putting a draft together on the wiki with what comes out of
  such a discussion.
  

It's also obvious that the clock is ticking on this issue, the folks in
Paraguay are off and running from what I can see, folks (or folk) in
Venezuela are eager to get going, the German team has always been in
place and hold a dominate position in our organization precisely because they 
where able to form a strong team, focused on their specific and local concerns 
during the previous decade. 

  
  I'm really concerned that if only a logo use policy is put in place
  there is a chance for continued problems from misunderstanding what the
  use of such a logo will imply.
  
  Then afterwards that draft could be presented to the SC for adoption.
  
  snip
  
  Thanks,
  
  //drew
  
  
 
 
 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


RE : Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-07-01 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Drew,

That's fine, you're making some good points :-) I look forward to this
discussion.

Best,

Charles.

Le 1 juil. 2011, 7:25 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com a écrit :

So the finished email follows:

On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:35 -0400, drew wrote:  Sorry guys that was
supposed to be a draft - not a...
place and hold a dominate position in our organization precisely because
they where able to form a strong team, focused on their specific and local
concerns during the previous decade.

I'm really concerned that if only a logo use policy is put in place
  there is a chance ...

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-06-24 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi Bernhard,

Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-06-10 00.25:

There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC
discussion or decision on this topic.

As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions
(definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external groups) I
don't think that this decision should be left to any of the teams like
marketing or design.


can you maybe put it on the agenda on one of the SC calls, maybe one you 
can attend?


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-06-14 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi Bernhard,

Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-06-10 00.25:


There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC
discussion or decision on this topic.

As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions
(definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external groups) I
don't think that this decision should be left to any of the teams like
marketing or design.


I'll try to discuss this during the next SC call.

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-06-09 Thread Bernhard Dippold

Hi Florian, *

Florian Effenberger schrieb:

Hi Bernhard,

Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-05-16 23.31:

Therefore I'd like to propose my position as starting point for a SC
discussion, leading to a decision we can base our work on and upload to
the wiki for future reference.


currently working on some older mails... has this already been adressed?


There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC 
discussion or decision on this topic.


As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions 
(definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external groups) I 
don't think that this decision should be left to any of the teams like 
marketing or design.


Best regards

Bernhard

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-06-07 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi Bernhard,

Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-05-16 23.31:

Therefore I'd like to propose my position as starting point for a SC
discussion, leading to a decision we can base our work on and upload to
the wiki for future reference.


currently working on some older mails... has this already been adressed?

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[steering-discuss] Request for official statement about dedicated logos for community groups

2011-05-16 Thread Bernhard Dippold

Hello SC members and deputies,

there has been a request to use a dedicated LibreOffice logo for a local 
team at Venezuela, that has not been replied by now in a way that I know 
what kind of logo is appreciated for such a group.


Therefore I'd like to propose my position as starting point for a SC 
discussion, leading to a decision we can base our work on and upload to 
the wiki for future reference.


What I think is:

All officially supported dedicated team logos should consist of
- the main LibreOffice logo
- the team's name (and short name, if applicable)
- an area for a graphic especially designed for this team (team related 
branding element)


For consistency and branding reasons the main visual element should be 
the LibreOffice logo and the other elements should be positioned in the 
same area for all the teams. Such a template should be provided by the 
Design team and can be based on any community members ideas.


A) Dedicated logos for officially supported LibreOffice teams (defined 
by dedicated TDF resources like http://team.libreoffice.org website or 
team@libreoffice.org mailing list) should contain the logo with TDF 
subline.


B) Logos for LibreOffice conference are similar to A), even if the 
conference team might not be given a website or mailing lists with the 
names mentioned in A).


C) Logos for regional marketing teams should contain the line .. 
Marketing Team, but as these teams are officially approved by TDF and 
provided with team@marketing.libreoffice.org mailing lists, their logo 
should contain the TDF subline too.


D) Individual community members (approved by the Membership Committee) 
should be allowed to use a logo without TDF containing a subline 
Community member. This logo could be placed as button on their 
external website or on a business card (following a design to be 
provided among our branding resources). This logo is not allowed to be 
used to behave like an official LibreOffice or TDF spokesperson or 
representative.


E) Local teams based on individual community members or supporters not 
being approved as community members by the MC should use a logo that 
contains Supporter of or team name for (e.g. Venezuelan user 
group for LibreOffice). These logos should respect the branding 
guidelines (especially background color and whitespace area), but are 
more free in their design. The design team will provide a template for 
such logos too.


I'd like to create drafts for each of these logos during the next days, 
but perhaps you can already understand what I mean:


Official TDF/LibreOffice teams should get an official logo to identify 
them. Individuals, supporters and non-official teams can use the 
LibreOffice logo based on the branding guidelines (and on the trademark 
policy), but not as approval for any official status - except the status 
as TDF community member.


Best regards

Bernhard

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted