RE: Channeling...

2008-09-30 Thread Curtis Burisch
I demand to have some booze!

10 points to anyone who can determine which movie that comes from.

Curtis. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Land
Sent: 30 September 2008 02:09 AM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Channeling...

\On Sep 29, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Jon Louis Mann wrote:


 In this case, Jon claims that John Williams is
 channeling erstwhile
 list-member Eric Rueter with his gruff posts.

 I don't recall a list member of that name, but
 there was an Erik
 Reuter.
 OK, Mr. Spelling Person, I stand corrected :-).
 Dave

 as i said before it was not i...

My apologies. Credit for introducing the You are X and I demand my Y  
meme goes to Rob.

Thanks for helping me remember that it is Erik, not Eric. I was fooled
by Rob's message, I think.

Dave


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Channeling...

2008-09-30 Thread Charlie Bell

On 30/09/2008, at 6:24 PM, Curtis Burisch wrote:

 I demand to have some booze!

 10 points to anyone who can determine which movie that comes from.

Withnail and I, you terrible c**t.

So, can you construct a Camberwell Carrot? Do you cover yourself in  
Deep Heat to stay warm? Have you gone 60 hours with the only solid  
passing your lips being a raw spud?

Charlie.
Too Easy Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Channeling...

2008-09-30 Thread Curtis Burisch
10 points to Charlie!!

And, in answer to your questions: Yes, no, and yes!

Curtis 

Get in the back of the van Maru!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charlie Bell
Sent: 30 September 2008 11:49 AM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Channeling...


On 30/09/2008, at 6:24 PM, Curtis Burisch wrote:

 I demand to have some booze!

 10 points to anyone who can determine which movie that comes from.

Withnail and I, you terrible c**t.

So, can you construct a Camberwell Carrot? Do you cover yourself in Deep
Heat to stay warm? Have you gone 60 hours with the only solid passing your
lips being a raw spud?

Charlie.
Too Easy Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Jon Louis Mann wrote:
 
 Instead of a 700 billion dollar bailout for corporate America, loan 
 that money to qualified American families who need to save their 
 home.  Bail out homeowners, rather than banks; that should solve the 
 housing crisis.
 
Each family would get... hmmm... 10,000 dollars? Sort of. It would
hardly scratch the problem, since, AFAIK, each family's debts
are about two magnitudes highter than that.

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Curtis Burisch
10,000 bucks would make a difference -- an extra $1000 a month for 10 months
would almost certainly ease the situation. The problem is not the debt
itself, but the increased cost of servicing that debt that has resulted from
higher interest rates.

Curtis 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alberto Monteiro
Sent: 30 September 2008 13:09 PM
To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
Subject: Re: Economic Recovery Plan


Jon Louis Mann wrote:
 
 Instead of a 700 billion dollar bailout for corporate America, loan 
 that money to qualified American families who need to save their home.  
 Bail out homeowners, rather than banks; that should solve the housing 
 crisis.
 
Each family would get... hmmm... 10,000 dollars? Sort of. It would hardly
scratch the problem, since, AFAIK, each family's debts are about two
magnitudes highter than that.

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread dsummersminet


-- Original message -- 
From: John Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 Dan M 
 
  
  Once told to me, the reason is obvious: flight to quality during a panic. 
  Do you differ? 
 
 Do I disagree that this was once told to you? 
 

Well, your view is such a mixture of accepting and rejecting common ecconomics, 
I do tend to forget what you accept as verified and what you say can't be 
verified as a result of complexity.  In other words, I cannot put together a 
consistent model of your posts...'though I'm trying.
There are two worthwhile points here.  First, 0.16% per year interest (given 
the present ~4% inflation rate) is close to money under the mattress.  
Second, the rise of the dollar indicates and the drop in the Fed (together) 
indicates the belief that nothing in Europe is as safe as the US government, 
even though the problem is here now.  
We have to hope that this doesn't spread to nervousness about Deutchbank and/or 
Barkley's.  Because if it does, to quote my old homeboy Zimmy from the '60s

quote
The highway is for gamblers, better use your sense
Take what you have gathered from coincidence
The empty handed painter from your streets
Is drawing crazy patterns on your sheets
.
..
end quote

I bet Julia and Rob can finish this.

Dan M. 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread John Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 Well, your view is such a mixture of accepting and rejecting common 
 ecconomics, 

Economists frequently disagree. Often, economics changes by having a professor
at a prestigious university pump out a bunch of students with the same views. 
This
kind of evolution is slow and not reliable since the selection forces rarely 
match
with whether the theories unambiguously model the system (worse, the system 
keeps changing!). Consequently, I don't hold any economic theories strongly, 
but 
those that I do hold are shared by some economists who have studied the data,
and disagreed with by other economists. Apparently your method of studying
economics is to survey all economists to find out which theory is the most
common? Opinion poll economics!

 Second, the rise of the dollar indicates and the drop in the Fed (together) 
 indicates the belief that nothing in Europe is as safe as the US government, 
 even though the problem is here now.  

Nothing is strong. The dollar went up against a broad basket of currencies
as they say. But did you check each of the major currencies that might be
a safe place to stash some cash, to see if they were all down with respect to
the dollar? I didn't (since I don't think the point is important), but I would 
before
I would make a statement like nothing in Europe Even then I would be
skeptical of my conclusion, since there are many factors affecting the system
and I am sure I am not aware of all of them.

 We have to hope that this doesn't spread to nervousness about Deutchbank 
 and/or 
 Barkley's.

We don't have to hope that. Personally, I hope that if either Barclay's or 
Deutsche
Bank made a lot of bad choices in their investments, then they will fail and be 
replaced
by a stronger bank or banks.


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread Nick Arnett
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:10 AM, John Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  Well, your view is such a mixture of accepting and rejecting common
 ecconomics,

 Economists frequently disagree.


More generally with each other than with themselves.

Nick (who is tempted to disagree with the sentence above)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Nick Arnett
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Alberto Monteiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Each family would get... hmmm... 10,000 dollars? Sort of. It would
 hardly scratch the problem, since, AFAIK, each family's debts
 are about two magnitudes highter than that.


Eh?  Two orders of magnitude more than $10,000 is $1 million.

Let's go shopping!

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread John Williams
Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:10 AM, John Williams
 wrote:

  Economists frequently disagree.
 
 More generally with each other than with themselves.

I have seen a lot of I am of two minds statements by 
economists recently.


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


I can't predict the future and I've been wrong quite a few times now

2008-09-30 Thread John Williams
A loan interview:

http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=186056

I can't predict the future and I've been wrong quite a few times now


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread Julia Thompson


On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, John Williams wrote:

 Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:10 AM, John Williams
 wrote:

 Economists frequently disagree.

 More generally with each other than with themselves.

 I have seen a lot of I am of two minds statements by
 economists recently.

II

I was of three minds,
Like a tree
In which there are three blackbirds.

(From Thirteen Wasy of Looking at a Blackbird by Wallace Stevens.)

Yeah.  Maybe I should step away from the computer until I'm more 
caffeinated.

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Nick Arnett wrote:

 Each family would get... hmmm... 10,000 dollars? Sort of. It would
 hardly scratch the problem, since, AFAIK, each family's debts
 are about two magnitudes highter than that.
 
 Eh?  Two orders of magnitude more than $10,000 is $1 million.

I based my estimates on the data I have - each family is
in debt at 3x their properties, each property evaluated
at $ 300,000. Am I wrong? Is it more than 1 MM?

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Nick Arnett
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Alberto Monteiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Nick Arnett wrote:
 
  Each family would get... hmmm... 10,000 dollars? Sort of. It would
  hardly scratch the problem, since, AFAIK, each family's debts
  are about two magnitudes highter than that.
 
  Eh?  Two orders of magnitude more than $10,000 is $1 million.
 
 I based my estimates on the data I have - each family is
 in debt at 3x their properties, each property evaluated
 at $ 300,000. Am I wrong? Is it more than 1 MM?


Are you talking about personal debt or the U.S. national debt?

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Nick Arnett wrote:

 I based my estimates on the data I have - each family is
 in debt at 3x their properties, each property evaluated
 at $ 300,000. Am I wrong? Is it more than 1 MM?
 
 Are you talking about personal debt or the U.S. national debt?

Personal debt. So, you think I am overestimating the crisis?

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Economic Recovery Plan

2008-09-30 Thread Dan M


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Alberto Monteiro
 Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:51 AM
 To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
 Subject: Re: Economic Recovery Plan
 
 
 Nick Arnett wrote:
 
  I based my estimates on the data I have - each family is
  in debt at 3x their properties, each property evaluated
  at $ 300,000. Am I wrong? Is it more than 1 MM?
 
  Are you talking about personal debt or the U.S. national debt?
 
 Personal debt. So, you think I am overestimating the crisis?

Definitely: I think that if you added up, even after the property price
drop, the value of the houses, cars, and personal goods and retirement
accounts and subtracted mortgages, credit card balances, auto loans, etc.,
the value of the debt is still only a fraction of the worth.  I think I read
that the average homeowner has 30% equity in their house, even now.
Remember, there was a 50% rise in prices before the 20% drop.

Dan M. 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Channeling...

2008-09-30 Thread Richard Baker
Dave said:

 Thanks for helping me remember that it is Erik, not Eric. I was
 fooled by Rob's message, I think.

I remember him getting annoyed with people continually making that  
mistake when he was here.

I miss Erik's points of view, but not entirely his methods of  
presenting them.

Rich
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread Dan M


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of John Williams
 Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:11 AM
 To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
 Subject: Re: My contribution to the bail-out
 
 We don't have to hope that. Personally, I hope that if either Barclay's
 or Deutsche Bank made a lot of bad choices in their investments, then they 
 will fail and be replaced by a stronger bank or banks.

As had been mentioned here before, they are both very highly leveraged.  My 
memory is that Barclay's leveraged 30 to 1 and Deutsche Bank is leveraged about 
50 to 1.

That means a modest run on ether bank will result in them becoming unable to 
give people who request the money they put in the bank that money.

Now, you may mention the recent purchases of banks that have had runs on them 
by other banks (after the FDIC paid off part of the bad debt).  Let's look at 
the assets of these banks from Wikipedia:

Citibank$1.50 trillion
Chase   $1.78 trillion
Wachovia$783 billion
WaMu$307 billion

You notice that Citibank is almost twice the size of Wachovia and Chase is over 
5x the size of WaMu.  Both have 10% reserves, so they felt they were in 
position (with the Feds covering part of the bad debt) to buy the assets of the 
smaller banks.

Now, let's look at Barclay's and Deutsche Bank.

Barcley's  1.27 trillion pounds   2.3 trillion dollars
Deutchbank €2.020 trillion2.9 trillion dollars

If there is a run on one of them, the obvious thing to do is to find a bigger 
bank with less leverage than 30-50 to take over the assets.  Do you know of any 
candidates who are in place to do so?

Even if they didn't make toxic loans, good loans can turn bad with a panic 
pretty soon.  Even if the long term position for the banks look good, they have 
precious little margin to survive a run. If there is a run on either bank that 
causes a failure, who is big enough to step in?  As far as I know, the answer 
may be the EU  the US government put together, but no private institution.

Dan M. 



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My contribution to the bail-out

2008-09-30 Thread John Williams
Dan M [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 As had been mentioned here before, they are both very highly leveraged.  My 
 memory is that Barclay's leveraged 30 to 1 and Deutsche Bank is leveraged 
 about 
 50 to 1.
 
 That means a modest run on ether bank will result in them becoming unable to 
 give people who request the money they put in the bank that money.

You persist in oversimplifying, and in ignoring creditors and bondholders. I 
wonder
if you have ever studied the balance sheet of a bank?

I have mentioned before, and even given a link to a nice explanation, that for 
the
large US investment banks, if they are declared insolvent and put into 
receivership, that
there is enough  debt to cover the bad assets without costing the customers and
countparties a dime.

I haven't looked at the balance sheets of Barclay's or Deutsche Bank, but I 
would
guess that they are in the same situation. If you disagree, then perhaps you can
take a look at their balance sheets and tell us what you find?


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


FWD: September Madness office pool

2008-09-30 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
Unfortunately, playing is NOT optional . . .

[begin forwarded message]

Great News - It's not too late to enter this year's September 
Madness office pool.  Here are the brackets as they currently stand:

http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/septembermadnessb.jpg


Just mark your picks and email them to your Congressman by 5:00 PM 
today.   The entry fee is 20% of your retirement savings and is 
non-refundable if you lose; unless of course you bet $25 billion or 
more, in which case you might be bailed out if you smile real nice 
and say pretty please.  The pool winner gets 65% of the pool and a 
$25 million severance check.  Pool counsel, the lobbyists and various 
other influential hangers-on get 35%.  The loser gets a 
third-position deed of trust on a no-money-down, half-built $800,000 
condo in Fresno owned by some guy whose livelihood entails front-line 
delivery of circular Italian-American food products.

Good Luck.

[end forwarded message]


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l