Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Ecch-onomics

2009-09-14 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Dan M. wrote:

   Subject: Welcome to Hyperinflation!
   Date: 2008-08-29 12:30

 I was just checking the evolution of PPI (PPI and CPI measure
 inflation in the USA), and noticed that _this year_ the
 accumulated inflation is about 10% (!!!)

 Yes, but I was talking about the period from 2008-01 to 2008-06.
 
 Why that period? (the PPI increased 6.5% during that period).

Because I was repeating my message of 2008-08-29. Notice the date.
It was quite obvious that something would happen soon. But the
idiots (me including) couldn't see what was coming.

Also, IIRC, the PPI is revised after a few months. The preliminary
data indicated a 10% inflation - a sure sign that Evil Days Were
Coming.
 
  I guess its a YMMV item.   I can usually find what I want in a 
 couple of minutes.  As an aside, the US is unique among countries in 
 the amount of available data.  It's much harder to get data from 
 other countries.
 
Maybe because the data is in English. I once tried to get some
data from Japan, and everything was in japanese characters - that
crazy mix of Kanji, Katakana, Hiragana, Arabic numbers and a few
Roman words.

Brazilian data are available at
http://www.ibge.gov.br

It's in Portuguese, Spanish and English (unfortunately, not in Latin,
the official language of Latin America).

Alberto Monteiro



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Ecch-onomics

2009-09-14 Thread Bruce Bostwick

On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:16 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:


At 04:44 PM Thursday 9/10/2009, Chris Frandsen wrote:

Here a title I have never heard before, Econophysicist!



How long until we hear about Relativistic Inflation . . . ?

:P


Well, Hubble expansion certainly seems to apply .. :D

-b




___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Ecch-onomics

2009-09-11 Thread dsummersmi...@comcast.net
Some of the time, but only some of the time, I have the sender as the
poster, not brin-l.  Alberto was nice enough to send it back to me so I can
repost it.

Dan M. 

 -
 From: Alberto Monteiro albm...@centroin.com.br
 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:46:01 -0200
 To: dsummersmi...@comcast.net, brin-l@mccmedia.com
 Subject: Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Ecconomics

 Dan M. wrote:
Subject: Welcome to Hyperinflation!
Date: 2008-08-29 12:30
 
  I was just checking the evolution of PPI (PPI and CPI measure
  inflation in the USA), and noticed that _this year_ the
  accumulated inflation is about 10% (!!!)
 
  Where did you get that?
 
 2008 data. And notice that I said PPI, not CPI.

 Two things on this.  First, PPI is always far more volital than CPI or WPI
 (Wholesale Price Index).  It is highly dependant on commodity prices.  When
 oil prices go from 140 to 35 to 70, the PPI is far more affected than
 either of these two.  Indeed, the CPI and WPI also have a core amount
 (excluding food and energy) that is a much better indicator of changes in
 the long range inflation.

 But, to look at what you quoted we have at

 http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_too
 l=latest_numbersseries_id=WPSSOP3000output_view=pct_1mth


 http://tinyurl.com/ndqm3x

 the PPI report itself.  If you add this year, we have a 1.2% increase in
 2009, and for the last calandar year a 6.5% decrease.  The BLS is the
 organization that measures US inflation and puts a lot of work into it.
 While others may argue about inflation being overstated by not including
 substitution of new goods to extend and reduce the cost of old goods
 properly, no one else measures inflation like the BLS.

 Yes, but I was talking about the period from 2008-01 to 2008-06.

 Why that period? (the PPI increased 6.5% during that period). It was before
 the meltdown and the government response.  Sinc ethen, we've had deflation.
 The net for the last 18 months is 0.  That's not inflation at all.

  http://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm
 
 This site is awful.
 
 There's so much information that I have no idea
 where the data came from. But it probably came from that site.

 I guess its a YMMV item.   I can usually find what I want in a couple of
 minutes.  As an aside, the US is unique among countries in the amount of
 available data.  It's much harder to get data from other countries.

 Dan M.



mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft®
Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Ecch-onomics

2009-09-11 Thread John Williams
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, dsummersmi...@comcast.net
dsummersmi...@comcast.net wrote:
 Some of the time, but only some of the time, I have the sender as the
 poster, not brin-l.  Alberto was nice enough to send it back to me so I can
 repost it.

As I posted before (maybe you missed it if that was when the list was
having problems), that is because your messages have the Reply-to: set
to both your personal email- and the list email-address.

So if someone hits reply, it depends on whether their email client
uses the Reply-to: or the From: field to reply. If they use the
Reply-to: then an email should go to both the list and to you
directly. Unless your email filters one of them, you should then
receive two copies when that happens. I suppose it is also possible
that some email readers arbitrarily choose just one of the two
email-addresses in the Reply-to: field.

I usually manually remove your personal email (as I have done on this
reply) from the To: field so that my reply only goes to the list.

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Ecch-onomics

2009-09-10 Thread Ronn! Blankenship

At 04:44 PM Thursday 9/10/2009, Chris Frandsen wrote:

Here a title I have never heard before, Econophysicist!



How long until we hear about Relativistic Inflation . . . ?

:P


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com