Trolling
I have no fsking idea what you are trolling about. That makes two of us! I'm having a good day if I understand more that 50% of what I am trolling about. Trolling is Internet slang is someone who posts controversial, irrelevant or off-topic messages in online community discussion forums, or chat rooms, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response, or to deliberately disrupt normal on-topic discussion. It is a practice often used by those who can not refute an argument using reason and logic, or someone who just enjoys baiting anyone who has a divergent opinion. [sic] Jon ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: Trolling
Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Trolling is Internet slang is someone who posts controversial, irrelevant or off-topic messages in online community discussion forums, or chat rooms, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response, or to deliberately disrupt normal on-topic discussion. It is a practice often used by those who can not refute an argument using reason and logic, or someone who just enjoys baiting anyone who has a divergent opinion. [sic] My sister has this little yappy dog. When I read your posts, I often find myself thinking of it. What do you suppose it would type (if it had fingers)? Maybe it could use its nose? ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Trolling
Trolling is Internet slang is someone who posts controversial, irrelevant or off-topic messages in on line community discussion forums, or chat rooms, with the intention of provoking other users into an emotional response, or to deliberately disrupt normal on-topic discussion. It is a practice often used by those who can not refute an argument using reason and logic, or someone who just enjoys baiting anyone who has a divergent opinion. [sic] My sister has this little yappy dog. When I read your posts, I often find myself thinking of it. What do you suppose it would type (if it had fingers)? Maybe it could use its nose? projecting again, john? has it ever occurred to you why some dogs have flat noses?*) it's not from pressing their nostrils to a keyboard... jon ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: trolling for trolls
It seems we have more nattering ninnies! But a new breed, cowardly whiners who only can whine when their victim can't read them! We have known for a while that Brin-L is full of passive-agressives who whine constantly while running sneaky attacks on people behind their backs. In case anyone missed it, David Brin himself pointed it out a while back. Incidentally, this thread is still missing a few countries from the Axis of Eggheads. My threaded email client is ready, and my left middle finger needs something to do! Is this some kind of subtle parody? It seems wildly out of place for Brin-L. Kevin Street -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.12 - Release Date: 5/17/2005 ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
On May 19, 2005, at 1:26 AM, Kevin Street wrote: Is this some kind of subtle parody? It might very well be. -- Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books http://books.nightwares.com/ Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
Incidentally, this thread is still missing a few countries from the Axis of Eggheads. If you are waiting for me to chime in... my momma taught me not to go near wild things that are frothing at the mouth Dee ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: trolling for trolls
At 03:26 AM Thursday 5/19/2005, Kevin Street wrote: Is this some kind of subtle parody? It seems wildly out of place for Brin-L. Because of its subtlety, of course. Not because it is parody. -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
At 10:23 AM Thursday 5/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you are waiting for me to chime in... my momma taught me not to go near wild things that are frothing at the mouth Yo momma warn't no dummy! -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
On 5/18/05, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. But... probabilities that are negative, or greater than 1- simply make no sense! Unpossible! ~Maru ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
On 5/19/05, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 05:52 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Nick Arnett wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. On a couple of other lists I am a member of, doing that or its converse (forwarding an on-list message off-list) is grounds for immediate dismissal, regardless of who does it or how long they have been there or how well liked they are. That policy got started a year or two ago when someone (who was lurking under an assumed name, it seems) forwarded out-of-context excerpts from one list member's posts to that list members RL employer, which led to that person being forced into early retirement from the teaching job he had held for several decades. -- Ronn! :) And some people wondered why I use a pseudonym- well, there you go. ~Maru You didn't think this was my real name, did you? ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
trolling for trolls
* Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. It seems we have more nattering ninnies! But a new breed, cowardly whiners who only can whine when their victim can't read them! We have known for a while that Brin-L is full of passive-agressives who whine constantly while running sneaky attacks on people behind their backs. In case anyone missed it, David Brin himself pointed it out a while back. Incidentally, this thread is still missing a few countries from the Axis of Eggheads. My threaded email client is ready, and my left middle finger needs something to do! ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. Here's another official warning, in public, since you've chosen to make this public -- my perception is that you've made a number of personal attacks lately, which are contrary to our list policies. Nick ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
At 05:52 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Nick Arnett wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. On a couple of other lists I am a member of, doing that or its converse (forwarding an on-list message off-list) is grounds for immediate dismissal, regardless of who does it or how long they have been there or how well liked they are. That policy got started a year or two ago when someone (who was lurking under an assumed name, it seems) forwarded out-of-context excerpts from one list member's posts to that list members RL employer, which led to that person being forced into early retirement from the teaching job he had held for several decades. -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
On May 18, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 05:52 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Nick Arnett wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. On a couple of other lists I am a member of, doing that or its converse (forwarding an on-list message off-list) is grounds for immediate dismissal, regardless of who does it or how long they have been there or how well liked they are. I had just discussed this kind of abuse in an off-list exchange with a manager of a list that I am on, in which I echoed Ronn!'s experience: there are plenty of lists on which the forwarding of off-list messages without permission is grounds for banning, if not heavy moderation. BUT: before we rush to judgment, I don't think we've heard from either Julia or Erik as to whether she'd given him permission. Also, the list's Etiquette Guidelines http://www.mccmedia.com/brin-l/etiquette.htm do not specifically address this issue, and not everyone has had Ronn!'s experience with other lists that observe it. It may simply be a matter of learning, like not top-posting. Dave ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
On 19 May 2005, at 1:32 am, Dave Land wrote: On May 18, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 05:52 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Nick Arnett wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. On a couple of other lists I am a member of, doing that or its converse (forwarding an on-list message off-list) is grounds for immediate dismissal, regardless of who does it or how long they have been there or how well liked they are. I had just discussed this kind of abuse in an off-list exchange with a manager of a list that I am on, in which I echoed Ronn!'s experience: there are plenty of lists on which the forwarding of off-list messages without permission is grounds for banning, if not heavy moderation. BUT: before we rush to judgment, I don't think we've heard from either Julia or Erik as to whether she'd given him permission. Also, the list's Etiquette Guidelines http://www.mccmedia.com/brin-l/ etiquette.htm do not specifically address this issue, and not everyone has had Ronn!'s experience with other lists that observe it. It may simply be a matter of learning, like not top-posting. Since it looks like the Julia's message was in her capacity as a list- admin that muddies the waters a bit more it seems to me. Especially since one of the people involved is Nick who is the list owner. -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/ It is our belief, however, that serious professional users will run out of things they can do with UNIX. - Ken Olsen, President of DEC, 1984. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
At 07:32 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Dave Land wrote: On May 18, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 05:52 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Nick Arnett wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. On a couple of other lists I am a member of, doing that or its converse (forwarding an on-list message off-list) is grounds for immediate dismissal, regardless of who does it or how long they have been there or how well liked they are. I had just discussed this kind of abuse in an off-list exchange with a manager of a list that I am on, in which I echoed Ronn!'s experience: there are plenty of lists on which the forwarding of off-list messages without permission is grounds for banning, if not heavy moderation. BUT: before we rush to judgment, I don't think we've heard from either Julia or Erik as to whether she'd given him permission. Also, the list's Etiquette Guidelines http://www.mccmedia.com/brin-l/etiquette.htm do not specifically address this issue, and not everyone has had Ronn!'s experience with other lists that observe it. It may simply be a matter of learning, like not top-posting. Just to be clear: I only mentioned the rules of that other list to show that some places it is justifiably considered more than just bad netiquette to do that I am not advocating any change in the list guidelines. Dave ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: trolling for trolls
William T Goodall wrote: On 19 May 2005, at 1:32 am, Dave Land wrote: On May 18, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 05:52 PM Wednesday 5/18/2005, Nick Arnett wrote: On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:15 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote * Julia Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've been asked to ask you to tone it down on personal attacks on-list. If you make many more personal attacks on-list, the probability of your being placed on moderation will be non-zero. Posting a private e-mail to the public list, which I'm fairly certain was done without Julia's permission, is lousy netiquette. On a couple of other lists I am a member of, doing that or its converse (forwarding an on-list message off-list) is grounds for immediate dismissal, regardless of who does it or how long they have been there or how well liked they are. I had just discussed this kind of abuse in an off-list exchange with a manager of a list that I am on, in which I echoed Ronn!'s experience: there are plenty of lists on which the forwarding of off-list messages without permission is grounds for banning, if not heavy moderation. BUT: before we rush to judgment, I don't think we've heard from either Julia or Erik as to whether she'd given him permission. Also, the list's Etiquette Guidelines http://www.mccmedia.com/brin-l/ etiquette.htm do not specifically address this issue, and not everyone has had Ronn!'s experience with other lists that observe it. It may simply be a matter of learning, like not top-posting. Since it looks like the Julia's message was in her capacity as a list- admin that muddies the waters a bit more it seems to me. Especially since one of the people involved is Nick who is the list owner. I agree with William. IMO, until there is some policy that specifically says otherwise, anything sent off-list by an admin in an administrative capacity is fair game for the list as a whole. I prefer to send such things off-list, as there is potential for public embarassment of the intended recipient if it's done publicly, but if the recipient wants to make it public, I personally don't have a problem with that. Non-administrative private e-mails, however, are a different matter, and I'd take a dim view of, say, Ronn! posting to the list something Dan M. had sent him off-list without first getting Dan's permission. Julia ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: On trolling
Now, if only I could find a Portland Timbers fan on Brin-L to taunt.. ^_^ You Troll Nerd From Hell ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: On trolling
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Gabriel Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 07:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: On trolling Good no one around here does that. Because none of us has a single agenda or point of view which we consistently hold to no matter what the circumstance Are you trying to insinuate that some of us are obsessed with SPORTS??? Perish the thought! :-) Jon Baseball. Football. Hockey. Soccer. Badminton. Maru. Damn, guilty as charged. Now, if only I could find a Portland Timbers fan on Brin-L to taunt.. ^_^ -j- ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
In a message dated 11/14/2003 5:01:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are you trying to insinuate that some of us are obsessed with SPORTS??? I was thinking more about Sports Wear. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
The Fool wrote: Stale marshmallows are best. I replied: That depends on just how stale they are. When we were cleaning out my parents' house after the tornado, we found a bag of marshmallows with an expiration date in the middle 1970's... Reggie Bautista Pretty Colors Maru Ronn! responded: Did they start out as different colors? Sadly, no. Reggie Bautista Technicolor Terror Maru _ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
Reggie Bautista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Fool wrote: Stale marshmallows are best. I replied: That depends on just how stale they are. When we were cleaning out my parents' house after the tornado, we found a bag of marshmallows with an expiration date in the middle 1970's... Pretty Colors Maru Ronn! responded: Did they start out as different colors? Sadly, no. Reggie Bautista Technicolor Terror Maru For those who wish to provide future gleaners-of-tornado-ravaged-houses with multicolored marshmallows, stock your home with Peeps For All Seasons: http://www.marshmallowpeeps.com/index.html Did you know that Peeps have participated in atmospheric research? Here is the NASA site: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast01apr_1m.htm ...However, one fascinating and tragic aspect of the story was not announced until now. The April 11 flight included five brave passengers -- intrepid explorers who never returned. Where they went, and how, remains a mystery. Stowed away on the weather balloon sent aloft in April 1999 were five tiny Peeps. How they got there is controversial. Most of his colleagues think they were smuggled on board by Bryan Walls, an irreverent member of the launch team. However it happened, one thing is clear -- these Peeps were not purchased with tax dollars and NASA does not endorse these brightly colored sweet treats!... Besides high-altitude testing, marshmallow bunnies have been subjected to lasers, open flames, and boiling water (be sure to check out the Wyle E. Coyote test!): http://www.keypad.org/bunnies/ Dissolving Into Silliness Maru :) __ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
At 10:02 PM 11/10/03 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote: The Fool wrote: Stale marshmallows are best. That depends on just how stale they are. When we were cleaning out my parents' house after the tornado, we found a bag of marshmallows with an expiration date in the middle 1970's... Reggie Bautista Pretty Colors Maru Did they start out as different colors? -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
In a message dated 11/10/2003 11:17:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wonder if this person would consider trolling to include posting multiple articles every day, with insult-laden subject lines, propogate a single peculiar agenda?It seems to me that that situation would consitute trolling while violating the first rule above. Good no one around here does that. Because none of us has a single agenda or point of view which we consistently hold to no matter what the circumstance ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Killer Bs Discussion) Subject: Re: On trolling Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:29:07 -0500 In a message dated 11/10/2003 11:17:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wonder if this person would consider trolling to include posting multiple articles every day, with insult-laden subject lines, propogate a single peculiar agenda?It seems to me that that situation would consitute trolling while violating the first rule above. Good no one around here does that. Because none of us has a single agenda or point of view which we consistently hold to no matter what the circumstance Are you trying to insinuate that some of us are obsessed with SPORTS??? Perish the thought! :-) Jon Baseball. Football. Hockey. Soccer. Badminton. Maru. Le Blog: http://zarq.livejournal.com _ From Beethoven to the Rolling Stones, your favorite music is always playing on MSN Radio Plus. No ads, no talk. Trial month FREE! http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On trolling
On another list I'm on, where the perennial heated discussion is whether or not Dune is the most incredible pieces of literature on the face of the Earth or just a pile of pulp best suited for use as a doorstop, a thread came up in which various people claimed the title best troll. And one of them posted these rules for trolling: First rule of trolling: One Post. Second rule: Never respond. If you actively respond, then you are spamming. Thought I'd share and see what anyone else had to say on the subject. And, just for the record, I really do like marshmallows. I just shouldn't eat too many of them, you know? Julia functioning on 4 hours' sleep, isn't this fun? ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] And, just for the record, I really do like marshmallows. I just shouldn't eat too many of them, you know? Stale marshmallows are best. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, The Fool wrote: From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] And, just for the record, I really do like marshmallows. I just shouldn't eat too many of them, you know? Stale marshmallows are best. Slightly stale marshmallows are good. I don't like them to get too far, though. Maybe I ought to put marshmallows on the shopping list. Julia ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
In a message dated 11/10/2003 8:33:07 PM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe I ought to put marshmallows on the shopping list. Julia Here, catch! -- ()_) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
The Fool wrote: Stale marshmallows are best. That depends on just how stale they are. When we were cleaning out my parents' house after the tornado, we found a bag of marshmallows with an expiration date in the middle 1970's... Reggie Bautista Pretty Colors Maru _ Is your computer infected with a virus? Find out with a FREE computer virus scan from McAfee. Take the FreeScan now! http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
At 06:41 PM 11/10/2003 -0600 Julia Thompson wrote: On another list I'm on, where the perennial heated discussion is whether or not Dune is the most incredible pieces of literature on the face of the Earth or just a pile of pulp best suited for use as a doorstop, a thread came up in which various people claimed the title best troll. And one of them posted these rules for trolling: First rule of trolling: One Post. Second rule: Never respond. If you actively respond, then you are spamming. I wonder if this person would consider trolling to include posting multiple articles every day, with insult-laden subject lines, propogate a single peculiar agenda?It seems to me that that situation would consitute trolling while violating the first rule above. JDG ___ John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity. - George W. Bush 1/29/03 ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
- Original Message - From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 6:41 PM Subject: On trolling On another list I'm on, where the perennial heated discussion is whether or not Dune is the most incredible pieces of literature on the face of the Earth or just a pile of pulp best suited for use as a doorstop,. Why can't it be both? Dan M. You can count me out (in) Maru ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: On trolling
Julia Thompson wrote: First rule of trolling: One Post. Second rule: Never respond. If you actively respond, then you are spamming. Hell no. Some of the best trolling is *developing* a running battle between participants and this can be done best by steering the argument in certain directions rather than smashing it there in one hit. Brevity and conciseness, yes - single strike, not necessarily. (Erik strikes me as someone *capable* of doing this well (though not necessarily inclined to do so) by gradually winding up the tempo rather than a single stir...) Cheers Russell C. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Trolling vs. healthy debates
How do we differentiate trolling from engaging in a healthy debate about any given issue? Sometimes I feel that the line separating these is an extremely fine one and hard to find. Any opinions out there? Cheers! -- Han Tacoma ~ Artificial Intelligence is better than none! ~ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: Trolling vs. healthy debates
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 07:49:02PM -0500, Han Tacoma wrote: How do we differentiate trolling from engaging in a healthy debate about any given issue? Sometimes I feel that the line separating these is an extremely fine one and hard to find. Are you trolling again, Han? :-) -- Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikreuter.net/ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Trolling vs. healthy debates
How do we differentiate trolling from engaging in a healthy debate about any given issue? Sometimes I feel that the line separating these is an extremely fine one and hard to find. Any opinions out there? Cheers! -- Han Tacoma ~ Artificial Intelligence is better than none! ~ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
