Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment)
Julia Thompson wrote: Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous? Back of the envelope calculation: Approx 200 out of 6 billion is 0.03% for each of your categories. I'm curious. Anyone have a good method for getting the data? I'm sure Dan M. has. :-) Regards, Ray. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic] Amendment)
At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote: Nerd from Hell confessed: If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person... Any other lefties out there? No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God. And as soon as we hunt him down and kill him, the list will be free of his sinister influence . . . They Don't Call It Right For Nothing Maru -- Ronn! ;-P ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment)
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 01:28 AM 2/22/04, Mike Lee wrote: Nerd from Hell confessed: If I can get one for being a pure Left-handed person... Any other lefties out there? No, there aren't. You're the last one. Thank God. And as soon as we hunt him down and kill him, the list will be free of his sinister influence . . . They Don't Call It Right For Nothing Maru -- Ronn! ;-P Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous? I'm curious. Anyone have a good method for getting the data? Julia ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
the dexterous spectrum (was: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment))
Julia Thompson wrote: Actually, in all seriousness, what are the percentages of left-handed people and right-handed people on the list? And ambidexterous? I'm curious. Anyone have a good method for getting the data? I'm ambi (of course) Ticia ',:) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
At 11:28 AM 2/19/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:38:08 -0600 At 06:13 PM 2/18/04, William T Goodall wrote: On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Heard about it here. ; should have been or :) Well, I still have not. I was in class or out traveling much of the day yesterday, and the news on the radio when I was en route did not mention it, and I haven't seen anything about it in today's headline summaries I've received so far. Can anyone give me a summary or provide a link to an on-line account? Thanks! Sure. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/17/state1932EST0125.DTL or http://tinyurl.com/362o9 Thanks! I had been wondering from the earlier discussion if perhaps the reason the courts had not stopped the marriages was that there was a problem with the original statue that somehow made the marriages legal, which would have been a really interesting development, but that makes it clear that the problem was in the request for the injunction . . . -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: Brin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic]Amendment)
At 01:53 PM 2/19/04, Deborah Harrell wrote: Miller, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snippage I didn't really think anyone was keeping a chart, but... me, I'm poly, transgendered, sapiosexual, with no children - fit THAT into your categories, Debbi ^_^ blinks opens mouth closes mouth shakes head Umm, I think it's safe to say that you're off any charts *I* might have access to ;) And just what is sapiosexual? wicked grin Only has sex with wise persons? Only has sex with humans? ...with the self-aware? Someone who can't get anyone but a sap to have sex with them . . . ;-P -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
At 06:13 PM 2/18/04, William T Goodall wrote: On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Heard about it here. ; should have been or :) Well, I still have not. I was in class or out traveling much of the day yesterday, and the news on the radio when I was en route did not mention it, and I haven't seen anything about it in today's headline summaries I've received so far. Can anyone give me a summary or provide a link to an on-line account? Thanks! -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
From: Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:38:08 -0600 At 06:13 PM 2/18/04, William T Goodall wrote: On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Heard about it here. ; should have been or :) Well, I still have not. I was in class or out traveling much of the day yesterday, and the news on the radio when I was en route did not mention it, and I haven't seen anything about it in today's headline summaries I've received so far. Can anyone give me a summary or provide a link to an on-line account? Thanks! Sure. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/17/state1932EST0125.DTL or http://tinyurl.com/362o9 :-D Jon Le Blog: http://zarq.livejournal.com _ Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200365ave/direct/01/ ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 02:14 PM 2/18/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer limits of the spectrum are represented. ;o) I resent that. What on earth ever for? Its not like I put some names to the deviatees or anything. Just some general abstractions into math. O:-) I may be a deviate, but am definitely not a standard deviate. So what do you deviate by then, if it ain't a standard? :-D Sonja ;o) GCU: Groan ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
- Original Message - From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:45 PM Subject: Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment) I may be a deviate, but am definitely not a standard deviate. So what do you deviate by then, if it ain't a standard? :-D He's a member of the deviant fraternity: sigma sigma sigma Dan M. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Won't Even Make The Usual Observation About Assuming Maru -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
At 02:14 PM 2/18/04, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote: In order to be average some need to be on either side of that average. I tend to think that we average out, but only with a big standard deviation over all the values, so that either side up to the outer limits of the spectrum are represented. ;o) I resent that. I may be a deviate, but am definitely not a standard deviate. -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage[sic]Amendment)
On 18 Feb 2004, at 9:57 pm, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: At 12:57 PM 2/18/04, Jon Gabriel wrote: I assume you've been watching the news about the semicolon that saved San Francisco. What about it? Nope. Haven't heard about it here. Heard about it here. ; should have been or :) -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/ It is our belief, however, that serious professional users will run out of things they can do with UNIX. - Ken Olsen, President of DEC, 1984. ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Re: Totally Gay: RE: BRin-L - are we average? (was RE: Federal Marriage [sic] Amendment)
At 06:04 PM 2/17/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I ask what GLBT stands for, Garlic, lettuce, bacon, and tomato. -- Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
