[Bug ld/13802] ld testsuite failure: comm-data.exp Common symbol override test; referred common symbol not UNDefined
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13802 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2012-03-05 23:37:58 UTC --- Same behavior seen in GNU ld 2.18.50.20080423 from CVS at the implied date so this is at least not a recent regression. N.B. the test-case assembly file got a linker warning Warning: tmpdir/comm-data2.o: Unknown EABI object attribute 44 unless not re-assembled with a contemporary assembler. Just mentioned for the record; I'm assuming this is to be expected between the old and the new tools as apparent from a readelf -a diff between old and new output): --- comm-data2.o.old.txtTue Mar 6 00:26:42 2012 +++ comm-data2.o.txtTue Mar 6 00:30:44 2012 @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ ELF Header: Version: 0x1 Entry point address: 0x0 Start of program headers: 0 (bytes into file) - Start of section headers: 172 (bytes into file) - Flags: 0x400, Version4 EABI + Start of section headers: 180 (bytes into file) + Flags: 0x500, Version5 EABI Size of this header: 52 (bytes) Size of program headers: 0 (bytes) Number of program headers: 0 and: @@ -62,3 +62,6 @@ Symbol table '.symtab' contains 10 entri No version information found in this file. Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes + Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes + Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-1 + Tag_DIV_use: Not allowed -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13802] New: ld testsute failure: comm-data.exp Common symbol override test; referred common symbol not UNDefined
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13802 Bug #: 13802 Summary: ld testsute failure: comm-data.exp Common symbol override test; referred common symbol not UNDefined Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: h...@sourceware.org Classification: Unclassified Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi Build binutils CVS HEAD as per 2012-03-05 for (cross to) --target=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi. Do make check. Observe: Running /home/hp/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/comm-data.exp ... FAIL: Common symbol override test It looks like arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi for a symbol defined in a DSO linked-to and referred to in the DSO being built, emits the symbol as (both in .dynsym and .symtab): 6: 00010298 4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT8 foo instead of the expected UNDefined symbol: +[0-9]+: +0+ +0 +OBJECT +GLOBAL +DEFAULT +UND +foo I vaguely recall that the ARM ABI has some unorthodoxisms in the handling of common symbols, so I'm not sure whether the test-case needs to be adjusted or skipped or if there indeed is an actual linker bug exposed by the test-case. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13802] ld testsuite failure: comm-data.exp Common symbol override test; referred common symbol not UNDefined
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13802 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ld testsute failure:|ld testsuite failure: |comm-data.exp Common symbol |comm-data.exp Common symbol |override test; referred |override test; referred |common symbol not UNDefined |common symbol not UNDefined -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13803] New: ld test-cases failing: arm-elf.exp erratum 760522 fix
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13803 Bug #: 13803 Summary: ld test-cases failing: arm-elf.exp erratum 760522 fix Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: h...@sourceware.org Classification: Unclassified Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi Build binutils CVS HEAD of 2012-03-05 for target arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi. Do make check-ld. Observe: Running /home/hp/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/arm-elf.exp ... FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (default for v6z) FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (explicitly on at v6z) FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (explicitly off at v6z) FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (default for v5) FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (default for v7-a) FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (default for ARM1156) That's all of the erratum 760522 tests. In ld.log, the log messages for these failures look similar: /home/hp/binutils/obj/a/ld/../binutils/objdump -d tmpdir/fix-arm1176-1 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^ [0-9a-f]+:8000 .word0x8000$ line2001020:8074 .word0x8074 FAIL: erratum 760522 fix (default for v6z) All having .word 0x8074 where .word0x8000 is expected. Apparently this is the address of a function being called, which happens to be located at 0x8074 for arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi instead of the expected 0x8000 (verified by looking at what's generated by a build targeted for arm-eabi); when generalizing the test-case, this seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13789] ld-elf/zerosize1 failing on mips targets
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13789 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2012-03-01 15:10:56 UTC --- Fixed for 2.23. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/13789] New: ld-elf/zerosize1 failing on mips targets
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13789 Bug #: 13789 Summary: ld-elf/zerosize1 failing on mips targets Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: h...@sourceware.org CC: r...@sourceware.org Classification: Unclassified Target: mips-elf, mipsel-linux Configure for either mips-elf, mipsel-linux (or likely any other mips-target). Build. Make check-ld. Observe: ... Running /expvol/pp_slask/hp/comptools/gitmove/updates/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ... FAIL: ld-elf/zerosize1 ... The offending line says xyzzy is of type OBJECT instead of the expected NOTYPE: 8: 00401004 0 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS xyzzy Unfortunately, I don't know whether that's a valid artefact of the mips ELF unorthodoxisms or a bug. FWIW, the test does not fail for neither of arm-eabi nor cris-elf. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3807] binutils failure for mips-elf on HEAD
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3807 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2012-03-01 04:07:43 UTC --- Apaprently fixed for MIPS as of at least CVS HEAD of 2012-03-01 (post-2.22), unknown whether fixed in any release. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3807] binutils failure for mips-elf on HEAD
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3807 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2012-03-01 04:09:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Apaprently fixed for MIPS as of at least CVS HEAD of 2012-03-01 (post-2.22), unknown whether fixed in any release. Oops, sorry, it's just xfailed. Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13095] New: gcc produces debug info with relocs that mmix readelf can't handle
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 Bug #: 13095 Summary: gcc produces debug info with relocs that mmix readelf can't handle Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: h...@sourceware.org Classification: Unclassified Target: mmix-* Created attachment 5899 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5899 object-file-testcase as submitted in the gcc PR. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202. Briefly mmix readelf --debug-dump=decodedline can't handle the info in the attached object file, instead yielding: readelf: Warning: unable to apply unsupported reloc type 5 to section .debug_line Decoded dump of debug contents of section .debug_line: CU: t.c: File nameLine numberStarting address t.c1 0 t.c20x28 t.c30x38 t.c40x3c t.c50xa8 UNKNOWN: length 2 t.c50xe0 UNKNOWN: length 2 (etc.) May be related to bug 3237. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13095] gcc produces debug info with relocs that mmix readelf can't handle
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2011-08-16 01:40:20 UTC --- reloc type 5 is R_MMIX_64, the MMIX instance of a canonical absolute 64-bit relocation. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13095] gcc produces debug info with relocs that mmix readelf can't handle
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2011-08-16 01:54:57 UTC --- After updating readelf.c to include the trivial MMIX relocs, I still see the UNKNOWN: length 2 lines. To be continued... -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/13095] gcc produces debug info with relocs that mmix readelf can't handle
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13095 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hp at sourceware dot org |redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12815] Segmentation fault when using a global variable, a special linker script and emulation elf64mmix
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12815 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2011-07-25 01:23:47 UTC --- Will instead error gracefully starting with binutils-2.22. See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-07/msg00199.html. If the error message isn't helpful enough, please suggest improvements here or on the list. Thanks for the report. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12931] ARM: gas fails to set the proper alignment on code sections, causing broken output
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12931 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at sourceware dot org --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2011-07-01 04:19:31 UTC --- Nick (being already CC:ed on the referred PR) or anyone else ARM-knowledgeable, pretty please have a quick look to see if the fix for this bug was the proper fix for PR sim/12737. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12390] binutils as accepts single '/' as if it were a comment
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12390 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at sourceware dot org --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2011-01-14 00:03:24 UTC --- Is the reporter confused by the placement of http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/i386_002dOptions.html#i386_002dOptions? Perhaps that /-documentation should go in a Syntax / Special characters subsection similar to other ports? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12390] binutils as accepts single '/' as if it were a comment
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12390 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at sourceware dot org 2011-01-14 00:19:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I hadn't seen that paragraph. That describes a comment format not mentioned in the comments section here: http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/as/Comments.html#Comments Stray and stale documentation there, which can easily be read as being complete. I'll rephrase myself: it is a mistake to mention port-specific features there at all. It should IMHO just be in each port-specific section (for the port at hand, 80386 Dependent Features), in a subsection called Syntax::Special characters. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11458] New: assertion fail /home/hp/binutils/src/bfd/elf32-cris.c:3109 elf_cris_copy_indirect_symbol
The attached test-case exposes a BFD_ASSERT covering a short-cut: instead of merging the lists of sections with pc-relative relocs (that have to be copied) when creating shared libraries, the list was just copied over to the direct symbol. Originally this failed when the shared library being created, contained a non-pic pc-relative reference to abort, which in glibc is versioned, thus being an indirect symbol to the linker. -- Summary: assertion fail /home/hp/binutils/src/bfd/elf32- cris.c:3109 elf_cris_copy_indirect_symbol Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: hp at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: cris-*-* and crisv32-*-* http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11458] assertion fail /home/hp/binutils/src/bfd/elf32-cris.c:3109 elf_cris_copy_indirect_symbol
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2010-03-30 23:14 --- Created an attachment (id=4690) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4690action=view) The .d file, to be placed in ld/testsuite/ld-cris. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11458] assertion fail /home/hp/binutils/src/bfd/elf32-cris.c:3109 elf_cris_copy_indirect_symbol
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2010-03-30 23:15 --- Created an attachment (id=4691) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4691action=view) The assembly input, to be put alongside the .d file. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11458] assertion fail /home/hp/binutils/src/bfd/elf32-cris.c:3109 elf_cris_copy_indirect_symbol
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-31 03:38 --- Subject: Bug 11458 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2010-03-31 03:38:26 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf32-cris.c Log message: PR ld/11458 * elf32-cris.c (elf_cris_copy_indirect_symbol): Remove invalid assert of empty pcrel_relocs_copied on the direct symbol. Instead of moving the list from the indirect symbol to the direct symbol, merge into any existing list. (cris_elf_check_relocs): Store the original section in the pcrel_relocs_copied list, not the relocation section. (elf_cris_discard_excess_dso_dynamics): Adjust accordingly to find the relocation section, for reducing its size. Change the BFD_ASSERT into a check for the section being read-only, and only emit warnings and TEXTREL marker when there's an entry for a read-only section. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.4970r2=1.4971 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-cris.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.107r2=1.108 --- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2010-03-31 03:42 --- See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-03/msg00433.html. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11458 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:39 --- Random comment coming out of the woodwork: I can't help thinking that you should change this and all uses to TARGET_PAGE_SIZE and TARGET_PAGE_MASK, and the problem would probably be solved. If you *really* need the host page size...no you don't. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11016] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:41 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11017 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11016 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/11017] PAGE_SIZE redefined in dlltool.c
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-11-24 21:41 --- *** Bug 11016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11017 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10623] SWYM with operands should accept operand 1 as a register
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-09-10 22:46 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10623] New: SWYM with operands should accept operand 1 as a register
To be mmixal-compatible, mmix-gas should accept SWYM $0,5 as a synonym for SWYM 0,5 (the operands having unpecified meaning for this NOP insn.) -- Summary: SWYM with operands should accept operand 1 as a register Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10623] SWYM with operands should accept operand 1 as a register
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2009-09-10 03:17 --- Looks like this was deliberate treatment of SWYM, in contrast to TRIP and TRAP, but I don't see why to discriminate. I also noticed a few bugs wrt. handling of non-literal operands, let me get them all covered... -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10623 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7050] New: TLS docs mssing for CRIS port
Oops, missed that part. The documentation is expected near the documentation for the PIC decorations in gas/doc/c-cris.texi, @node CRIS-Pic. -- Summary: TLS docs mssing for CRIS port Product: binutils Version: 2.20 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7050 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7050] TLS docs mssing for CRIS port
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED GCC target triplet||cris-*-* and crisv32-*-* Priority|P2 |P3 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7050 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7050] TLS docs mssing for CRIS port
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hp at sourceware dot org |redhat dot com | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7050 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/7034] objdump dumping dynamic relocs does not work with disassembly; option -d negates option -R
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-16 22:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) Dynamic relocations typically don't apply to the (read-only) text segment, so it is no surprise that there are no relocations to be displayed. How is that relevant? Oh I see, you thought I meant just those two options and meant the -R to somehow be related to the -d. No, that's just the minimal set needed to expose the bug. Actually, the options I tried were something like -d -h -t -r -p -R for inspection of the contents of interest when writing a regression-test, and I was curious to find that the dynamic relocations weren't displayed. I hope you now agree with my conclusion that it's a bug that -d stops -R. ;) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7034 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/7034] objdump dumping dynamic relocs does not work with disassembly; option -d negates option -R
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-16 23:11 --- (In reply to comment #3) Not a bug. -d -R means disassemble, displaying dynamic relocs on instructions, exactly as -d -r means disassemble with normal relocs. You don't get a separate dump of relocs in either of these cases. Without the -d, I get a separate dump of the relocs, so it's either a doc bug or a bug that I don't get a separate dump. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7034 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/7034] objdump dumping dynamic relocs does not work with disassembly; option -d negates option -R
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-16 23:23 --- (In reply to comment #3) Not a bug. -d -R means disassemble, displaying dynamic relocs on instructions, Umm, I don't see the logic at all as dynamic relocs rarely apply to instructions. You just don't expect them to be interspersed with the disassembly. The manual also correctly describes the behavior of -d with -r, but says nothing about -d with -R. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7034 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/7028] New: valgrind complaints running ld-elf/header
For all the targets above, I see in ld.log:
Executing on host: sh -c {valgrind -q /home/hp/binutils/obj/l/ld/ld-new
-L/home/hp/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -T header.t -z max-page-size=0x100
-o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o 21} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
==2996== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==2996==at 0x875F73: __write_nocancel (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x8121F6: _IO_do_write@@GLIBC_2.1 (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x811BCF: _IO_file_overflow@@GLIBC_2.1 (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x812F08: _IO_switch_to_get_mode (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x8115C7: _IO_file_seekoff@@GLIBC_2.1 (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x807D7F: _IO_seekoff_unlocked (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x80F004: fseeko64 (in /lib/libc-2.8.so)
==2996==by 0x806B407: bfd_seek (bfdio.c:365)
==2996==by 0x809F1CE: elf_link_flush_output_syms (elflink.c:8153)
==2996==by 0x80AAB97: bfd_elf_final_link (elflink.c:10619)
==2996==by 0x805E193: ldwrite (ldwrite.c:567)
==2996==by 0x805D5D3: main (ldmain.c:462)
==2996== Address 0x400c020 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
succeeded with: (repeated), expected:
(the above repeated again for unknown reasons)
FAIL: ld-elf/header
Looks like a target-independent bug; something or other is left uninitialized.
--
Summary: valgrind complaints running ld-elf/header
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-linux-gnu, arm-unknown-linux-gnu, i686-pc-
linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7028
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/7028] valgrind complaints running ld-elf/header
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-13 00:52
---
Looks like SIZEOF_HEADERS oscillating between 32 and 64 is part of the problem,
see ld/emultempl/elf-generic.em:gld${EMULATION_NAME}_map_segments.
Then, the place that allocates space for headers allocates a different amount
than is output, for the test-case. Patch in testing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7028
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/7028] valgrind complaints running ld-elf/header
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hp at sourceware dot org |redhat dot com | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7028 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/7028] valgrind complaints running ld-elf/header
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-13 03:10 --- Committed http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-11/msg00125.html. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7028 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7020] uninitialized read running gas test conditional listings
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-12 00:50 --- Patch at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-11/msg00098.html. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7020] uninitialized read running gas test conditional listings
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hp at sourceware dot org |redhat dot com | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7025] New: uninitialized read running gas test macros dot
Running the gas testsuite through valgrind on the mentioned targets yields:
Executing on host: sh -c {valgrind -q /home/hp/binutils/obj/a/gas/as-new -alm
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s 21} /dev/null dump.out
(timeout = 300)
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s: Assembler messages:
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s:13: Warning: attempt to
redefine pseudo-op `.macro' ignored
==29160== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
==29160==at 0x805C566: _find_end_of_line (read.c:5803)
==29160==by 0x80623A1: read_a_source_file (read.c:725)
==29160==by 0x804C21E: main (as.c:1045)
==29160==
==29160== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==29160==at 0x8062808: read_a_source_file (read.c:792)
==29160==by 0x804C21E: main (as.c:1045)
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s:27: Error: unknown
pseudo-op: `.xyz'
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s:28: Error: bad instruction
`x.y.z 0'
ARM GAS /home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s
page 1
1 .altmacro
... (gas listing elided)
regexp_diff match failure
regexp ^.*:27: Error: unknown pseudo-op: .\.xyz.$
line ==29160== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
regexp_diff match failure
regexp ^.*:28: Error: .*$
line ==29160==at 0x805C566: _find_end_of_line (read.c:5803)
FAIL: macros dot
--
Summary: uninitialized read running gas test macros dot
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf, arm-unknown-linux-gnu, bfin-unknown-
uclinux, i686
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7025
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7025] uninitialized read running gas test macros dot
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7025 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7020] uninitialized read running gas test conditional listings
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-12 02:13 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7025] uninitialized read running gas test macros dot
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-12 02:14 --- Patch at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-11/msg00106.html. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7025 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7025] uninitialized read running gas test macros dot
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hp at sourceware dot org |redhat dot com | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7025 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7025] uninitialized read running gas test macros dot
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-11-12 02:43 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7025 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/7020] New: uninitialized read running gas test conditional listings
Running the gas testsuite through valgrind on the mentioned two (but probably
all) targets yields (from gas.log):
Executing on host: sh -c {valgrind -q /home/hp/binutils/obj/e/gas/as-new -alc
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/cond.s dump.out 2gas.stderr}
/dev/null (timeout = 300)
==8817== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==8817==at 0x8060B5C: read_a_source_file (read.c:794)
==8817==by 0x804C446: main (as.c:1045)
FAIL: conditional listings
--
Summary: uninitialized read running gas test conditional
listings
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf, arm-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7020
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-10-04 16:46 --- (In reply to comment #7) Hi Hans-Peter, Would you mind if I add a specific gas-testcase for \@ in a section directive and elsewhere? Please do. Come to think of it, that test shows that the \@ handling in .section is the exception, as TRT already happens elsewhere. Actually it was nothing to do with the .section directive. It was all to do with the expansion of the \@ sequence inside the body of a macro. Of course, being the implied context of this PR, and no proof that enforcing some quoting semantics elsewhere is desired or worthwhile. I have attached a revised patch Please give it a try and let me know if you are happy with it. Happy, happy. And so are cris-axis-elf, cris-axis-linux-gnu, arm-linux dlx-elf and mmix-knuth-mmixware regression results FWIW. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6926 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-10-03 06:24 --- (In reply to comment #4) gas/cris/macroat Come to think of it, that test shows that the \@ handling in .section is the exception, as TRT already happens elsewhere. Please reconsider doing it always instead of having a tc_allow_escaped_end_of_line. Or rename it tc_allow_escaped_end_of_line_in_pseudos_or_perhaps_just_dot_section. :) BTW, I think @progbits and whatnot in .section is correctly handled, i.e. not breaking the line. Oddness galore. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6926 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-10-03 00:04 --- While I do think tc_allow_escaped_end_of_line is overkill and being overcautious that the canonical escape sequence won't fly, the patch certainly works for me. Thanks for fixing this so very promtly! (I would have got to it sooner or later, probably later. ;) Would you mind if I add a specific gas-testcase for \@ in a section directive and elsewhere? Kinda odd that there wasn't any generic one. (Right, there are target-specific ones: gas/cris/macroat and gas/arm/backslash-at.) -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6926 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6926] New: Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars
The CRIS port has const char line_separator_chars[] = @; Apparently this causes a conflict with the \@ macro invocation number counter, as evident by building and checking for cris-axis-linux-gnu: Running x/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp ... FAIL: ld-elf/multibss1 with ld.log saying: x/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/multibss1.s: Assembler messages: x/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/multibss1.s:2: Warning: stray `\' x/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/multibss1.s: Assembler messages: x/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/multibss1.s:2: Warning: stray `\' I guess the simplest and most obvious route would be to make the \ escape any special meaning of the following char (the line-separatorness of @ for this case and perhaps similarly for comment_chars; haven't tested if there's a similar FAIL for ARM where comment_chars contains @). Note: DLX also has the same line_separator_chars. -- Summary: Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars Product: binutils Version: 2.20 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: cris-axis-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6926 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6926] Macro number feature \@ conflicting with @ in line_separator_chars
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2008-10-01 00:04 --- (In reply to comment #0) ...haven't tested if there's a similar FAIL for ARM where comment_chars contains @. Nope, the test passes there. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6926 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/6607] New: gas interprets large LOC constant argument as stepping backwards
For this code: LOC #8000 BootGETA$0,DTrap%set dynamic- and forced-trap handler the GAS MMIX port complains as follows: loc-6.s:4: Error: LOC expression stepping backwards is not supported It'd reasonable to special-case this value (or any value with the low 56 bits zero) as pointing to a special unnamed segment, and not stepping relative within the current segment. Compare to special-casing of constants for Data_Segment, Pool_Segment and Stack_Segment. It'd also be reasonable to treat absolute LOC arguments as unsigned and only check for stepping backwards when there's previous contents. -- Summary: gas interprets large LOC constant argument as stepping backwards Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3795] New: gas failures for arm-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed Dec 27 06:42:42 2006, I get these failues for make check-gas for --target=arm-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/arm.exp ... FAIL: Neon optional register operands FAIL: gas/arm/thumbrel with the gas.log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/arm/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -dr --prefix-addresses --show-raw-insn dump.o dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f30cae72vacge\.f32 q5, q6, q9$ line 0114 .text+0x114 f32cae72 vacgt.f32 q5, q6, q9 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f320eed2vacgt\.f32 q7, q8, q1$ line 0118 .text+0x118 f300eed2 vacge.f32 q7, q8, q1 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f326e370vcge\.u32 q7, q3, q8$ line 0124 .text+0x124 f326e360 vcgt.u32q7, q3, q8 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f326e360vcgt\.u32 q7, q3, q8$ line 0128 .text+0x128 f326e370 vcge.u32q7, q3, q8 FAIL: Neon optional register operands ... /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/arm/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -dr --prefix-addresses --show-raw-insn dump.o dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f30cae72vacge\.f32 q5, q6, q9$ line 0114 .text+0x114 f32cae72 vacgt.f32 q5, q6, q9 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f320eed2vacgt\.f32 q7, q8, q1$ line 0118 .text+0x118 f300eed2 vacge.f32 q7, q8, q1 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f326e370vcge\.u32 q7, q3, q8$ line 0124 .text+0x124 f326e360 vcgt.u32q7, q3, q8 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0[0-9a-f]+ [^]+ f326e360vcgt\.u32 q7, q3, q8$ line 0128 .text+0x128 f326e370 vcge.u32q7, q3, q8 FAIL: Neon optional register operands -- Summary: gas failures for arm-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3796] New: ld failures for arm-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed Dec 27 06:42:42 2006, I get these failues for make check-ld for --target=arm-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/arm-elf.exp ... FAIL: Thumb-2 BL FAIL: Thumb shared library with ARM entry points with the ld.log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/arm/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/thumb2-bl -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-arm -Ttext 0x100\ 0 --section-start .foo=0x1001000 tmpdir/thumb2-bl.o tmpdir/thumb2-bl.o: In function `_start': (.text+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_THM_CALL against `bar' FAIL: Thumb-2 BL ... /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/arm/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/armthumb-lib.so -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-arm -share\ d -T arm-lib.ld tmpdir/mixed-lib.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/arm/ld/ld-new: tmpdir/mixed-lib.o(lib_func2): warning: interworking not enabled. first occurrence: tmpdir/mixed-lib.o: arm call to thumb FAIL: Thumb shared library with ARM entry points -- Summary: ld failures for arm-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3802] New: binutils failure for m32c-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get this failure for make check-binutils for --target=m32c-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objdump.exp ... Version /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/binutils/objdump 20061227 FAIL: objdump -f with the binutils.log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/binutils/objdump -f tmpdir/bintest.o Executing on host: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/binutils/objdump -f tmpdir/bintest.o (timeout = 300) ^M tmpdir/bintest.o: file format elf32-m32c^M architecture: m16c, flags 0x0011:^M HAS_RELOC, HAS_SYMS^M start address 0x^M ^M tmpdir/bintest.o: file format elf32-m32c architecture: m16c, flags 0x0011: HAS_RELOC, HAS_SYMS start address 0x FAIL: objdump -f -- Summary: binutils failure for m32c-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: m32c-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3802 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3803] New: gas failures for m32c-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get these failures for make check-gas for --target=m32c-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp ... FAIL: comment.s: comments in listings FAIL: align FAIL: incbin ... Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/macros.exp ... FAIL: semi with the gas.log file containing: Starting ../as-new -al comment.s M16C/M32C GAS /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/comment.s page 1^M ^M ^M 1# This test file is to see whether comments get written into listings^M 2# correctly. The file has no real contents.^M 3 04040404 /* C comments too! */^M FAIL: comment.s: comments in listings ... /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -s -j .text dump.o dump.out extra lines in dump.out starting with ^ 0040 04040404 $ EOF from /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/align.d FAIL: align ... /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -s -j .text dump.o dump.out extra lines in dump.out starting with ^ 0040 04040404 $ EOF from /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/incbin.d FAIL: incbin ... /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -s -j .text dump.o dump.out extra lines in dump.out starting with ^ 0020 04040404 $ EOF from /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/semi.d FAIL: semi -- Summary: gas failures for m32c-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: m32c-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3804] New: ld failures for m32c-elf on HEAD
/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/em\ pty-address-3.s ./ld-new -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts -T empty-address-3a.t -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/ld/../binutils/nm-new -n tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump.out extra regexps in /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3a.d starting with ^0+10 A __data_end$ EOF from tmpdir/dump.out FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3a /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/ld/../gas/as-new-o tmpdir/dump0.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/em\ pty-address-3.s ./ld-new -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts -T empty-address-3b.t -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/ld/../binutils/nm-new -n tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump.out extra regexps in /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3b.d starting with ^0+10 A __data_end$ EOF from tmpdir/dump.out FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3b /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/ld/../gas/as-new-o tmpdir/dump0.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/em\ pty-address-3.s ./ld-new -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts -T empty-address-3c.t -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32c/ld/../binutils/nm-new -n tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump.out extra regexps in /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-scripts/empty-address-3c.d starting with ^0+1010 A __data_end$ EOF from tmpdir/dump.out FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3c -- Summary: ld failures for m32c-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: m32c-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3804 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3805] New: ld failure for m32r-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get this failure for make check-Y for --target=m32r-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/sec64k.exp ... FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec-r with the ld.log file containing: ./ld-new -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -r -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o tmpdir/dump1.o tmpdir/dump2.o t\ mpdir/dump3.o tmpdir/dump4.o tmpdir/dump5.o tmpdir/dump6.o tmpdir/dump7.o tmpdir/dump8.o tmpdir/dump9.o tmpdir/dump10.o tmpdir/du\ mp11.o tmpdir/dump12.o tmpdir/dump13.o tmpdir/dump14.o tmpdir/dump15.o tmpdir/dump16.o tmpdir/dump17.o tmpdir/dump18.o tmpdir/dum\ p19.o tmpdir/dump20.o tmpdir/dump21.o tmpdir/dump22.o tmpdir/dump23.o tmpdir/dump24.o tmpdir/dump25.o tmpdir/dump26.o tmpdir/dump\ 27.o tmpdir/dump28.o tmpdir/dump29.o tmpdir/dump30.o tmpdir/dump31.o tmpdir/dump32.o tmpdir/dump33.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/m32r/ld/../binutils/readelf -W -Ss tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp ^There are 680.. section headers.*:$ line There are 102009 section headers, starting at offset 0x13e564: extra regexps in tmpdir/64ksec-r.d starting with ^ \[ 0\] .* 682[0-9][0-9][ ]+0[ ]+0$ EOF from tmpdir/dump.out FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec-r -- Summary: ld failure for m32r-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: m32r-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3807] New: binutils failure for mips-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get this failure for make check-binutils for --target=mips-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp ... Version /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/binutils/objcopy 20061227 FAIL: --localize-hidden test 1 with the .log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/binutils/objdump --syms tmpdir/copy.o tmpdir/dump.out extra regexps in /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/localize-hidden-1.d starting with ^0+2200 l .*\\ *ABS\* 0+ \.hidden Ghidden$ EOF from tmpdir/dump.out FAIL: --localize-hidden test 1 -- Summary: binutils failure for mips-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mips-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3807 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3808] New: gas failure for mips-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get this failure for make check-gas for --target=mips-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp ... FAIL: MIPS16 intermix with the gas.log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new -mips32r2 -o dump.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuit\ e/gas/mips/mips16-intermix.s /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -t dump.o dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0+[0-9a-f]+ ld .mips16.fn.m16_d 0+[0-9a-f]+ .mips16.fn.m16_d$ line 003c g F .text 000c m32_d regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0+[0-9a-f]+ l F .mips16.fn.m16_d 0+[0-9a-f]+ __fn_stub_m16_d$ line 0048 g F .text 000c 0xf0 m16_d regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0+[0-9a-f]+ l F .text 0+[0-9a-f]+ m32_static_d$ line *UND* __mips16_fixdfsi regexp_diff match failure (many more differences pruned) -- Summary: gas failure for mips-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mips-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3808 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3809] New: ld failures for mips-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get these failures for make check-ld for --target=mips-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp ... FAIL: MIPS eh-frame 3 FAIL: MIPS eh-frame 4 FAIL: Global calls from mips16 with the ld.log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/ld/../gas/as-new -EB -mips3 -mabi=eabi --defsym alignment=3 --defsym fill=0 --defsym foo=0x1020\ 304050607080 -o tmpdir/dump1.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/eh-frame1.s ./ld-new -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf -EB -Teh-frame1.ld -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump0.o tmpdir/dum\ p1.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/ld/../binutils/readelf -wf tmpdir/dump tmpdir/dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0040 0014 0044 FDE cie= pc=00020030..00020060$ line 0040 000c CIE regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0058 0014 005c FDE cie= pc=00020060..000200a0$ line Version: 1 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0070 0014 0074 FDE cie= pc=000200a0..000200f0$ line Augmentation: regexp_diff match failure regexp ^0088 001c CIE$ line Code alignment factor: 1 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^ Version: 1$ line Data alignment factor: 4 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^ Augmentation: zP$ line Return address column: 31 regexp_diff match failure regexp ^ Code alignment factor: 1$ line DW_CFA_nop regexp_diff match failure regexp ^ Data alignment factor: 4$ line DW_CFA_nop regexp_diff match failure (more differences pruned, similar differences for eh-frame 4) ... /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/ld/../gas/as-new -o tmpdir/mips16-call-global-3.o -mips32r2 /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld\ /testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips16-call-global-3.s /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/mips16-call-global -L/mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-e\ lf tmpdir/mips16-call-global-1.o tmpdir/mips16-call-global-2.o tmpdir/mips16-call-global-3.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mips/ld/../binutils/objdump -dr tmpdir/mips16-call-global dump.out regexp_diff match failure regexp ^.*0090 __start:$ line 00400018 __start: regexp_diff match failure regexp ^.*0090:64c3save24,ra$ line 400018: 64c3save24,ra regexp_diff match failure regexp ^.*0092:1a00 002e jal .*00b8 x\+0x8$ line 40001a: 1a00 000d jal 400034 y+0x4 (more seemingly-only address differences pruned) ... regexp ^.*00b4:6500nop$ line ... extra regexps in /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-mips-elf/mips16-call-global.d starting with ^.*00b6: 6500 \ nop$ EOF from dump.out FAIL: Global calls from mips16 -- Summary: ld failures for mips-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mips-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3809 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3810] New: gas failures for mn10300-elf on HEAD
With HEAD binutils checked out as of Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC, I get these failures for make check-gas for --target=mn10300-elf: Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp ... FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2) FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3) ... Running /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/elf.exp ... FAIL: .equ redefinitions (ELF) with the gas.log file containing: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new -o dump.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all\ /redef2.s ../as-new: dump.o: symbol `sym' required but not present /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef2.s: Assembler messages: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef2.s:12: Fatal error: can't close dump.o: No symbols /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mn10300/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -rs -j .data -j \$DATA\$ dump.o dump.out /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mn10300/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o': No such file FAIL: .equ redefinitions (2) /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new -o dump.o /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all\ /redef3.s ../as-new: dump.o: symbol `sym' required but not present /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s: Assembler messages: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/all/redef3.s:12: Fatal error: can't close dump.o: No symbols /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mn10300/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -rsj .data dump.o dump.out /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mn10300/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o': No such file FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3) ... ../as-new: dump.o: symbol `sym' required but not present /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s: Assembler messages: /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/src/gas/testsuite/gas/elf/redef.s:10: Fatal error: can't close dump.o: No symbols /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mn10300/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump -t dump.o dump.out /mnt/test1/hp/axis/binutils/mn10300/gas/testsuite/../../binutils/objdump: 'dump.o': No such file FAIL: .equ redefinitions (ELF) -- Summary: gas failures for mn10300-elf on HEAD Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mn10300-elf http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3810 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3795] gas failures for arm-elf on HEAD
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2006-12-27 07:31 --- Absolute time-stamp: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3796] ld failures for arm-elf on HEAD
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2006-12-27 07:32 --- Absolute time-stamp: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:05:09 UTC. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3805] ld failure for m32r-elf on HEAD
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2006-12-27 07:37 --- When reading, s/check-Y/check-ld/ in the description please. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/2101] New: misassembly of hex constants that look like local label references.
For this code: x: swym 0: setl $9,#1F 1: setl $8,#1B2F setl $7,0xFF9F setl $6,#1F3A 9: setl $5,#1B setl $4,#1A1B setl $3,0x9F setl $2,0x9B setl $1,0x1F setl $0,0x1b Assembled with default options, you get this disassembly: /tmp/x.o: file format elf64-mmix Disassembly of section .text: x: 0: fd00swym 0,0,0 4: e309setl $9,0x0 8: e3081b2fsetl $8,0x1b2f c: e307ff9fsetl $7,0xff9f 10: e3061f3asetl $6,0x1f3a 14: e305setl $5,0x0 18: e3041a1bsetl $4,0x1a1b 1c: e303009fsetl $3,0x9f 20: e302009bsetl $2,0x9b 24: e301001fsetl $1,0x1f 28: e31bsetl $0,0x1b Note the misassembly of the insns setting $9 and $5 respectively. -- Summary: misassembly of hex constants that look like local label references. Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: hp at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2101 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-12-23 03:30 --- Reopening; still not fixed. Needs a makeinfo = 4.2 4.5 (?) to repeat the behavior. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED GCC target triplet|hppa64-linux|hppa64-linuxinux |inux| Resolution|WORKSFORME | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1879] FAIL: weakref tests
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-11-19 07:46 --- Hey, it's the same FAILs as for mmix-knuth-mmixware! Ever since rth's change from .set to = for these tests. I scratched the host and build fields, as this was a cross from i686-pc-linux-gnu (FC2). -- What|Removed |Added CC||hp at sourceware dot org GCC build triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 | GCC host triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 | GCC target triplet|hppa*-*-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux11.11 mmix- ||knuth-mmixware http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1879 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1501] ld-mmix/bpo-10 failing
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-10-31 04:18 --- Fixed; see URL:http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00465.html. Test results the binutils MMIX port are now expected to be all clean again. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1501 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1630] New: gas weakref tests fail on most (all?) targets
For cris-elf, mmix-knuth-mmixware and native x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu I see Running /home/hp/combined/combined/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp ... FAIL: weakref tests, relocations FAIL: weakref tests, global syms FAIL: weakref tests, local syms FAIL: weakref tests, strong undefined syms FAIL: weakref tests, weak undefined syms Further analysis in the thread starting at URL:http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00412.html. -- Summary: gas weakref tests fail on most (all?) targets Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: aoliva at sources dot redhat dot com,bug-binutils at gnu dot org,jbeulich at novell dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1630 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1567] New: 64-bit problem for cris building Linux
Building the Linux kernel can lead to this error: arch/cris/mm/mm.o: In function `free_initmem': arch/cris/mm/mm.o(.text+0x1e0): relocation truncated to fit: R_CRIS_32 __init_begin make[3]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 Apparently a 64-bit-host problem. To be investigated. -- Summary: 64-bit problem for cris building Linux Product: binutils Version: 2.12 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: hp at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: cris http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1567 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1567] 64-bit problem for cris building Linux
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-10-28 00:58 --- See URL:http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00427.html. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1567 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1508] FAIL: ld-elf/unknown
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hp at sourceware dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1508 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1502] New: regression: ld-mmix/bspec2 fails
Started failing between LAST_UPDATED Fri Oct 14 17:12:36 UTC 2005 and Sun Oct 16 01:33:18 UTC 2005. Still failed with Mon Oct 17 15:28:21 UTC 2005. Running /home/hp/combined/combined/ld/testsuite/ld-mmix/mmix.exp ... ... FAIL: ld-mmix/bspec2 The message in ld.log indicates a too large diff to usefully paste here. Executing the test by hand, it seems there's now two sections both named .MMIX.spec_data.2. That just can't be just a ld layout thing but a real bug. I suspect the recent place-orphans-by-type changes. -- Summary: regression: ld-mmix/bspec2 fails Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mmix-knuth-mmixware http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1502 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/886] gas/mmix/relax2 fails
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-05-07 06:27 --- Same general reply as in PR 885, but for this one, I'm assigned to fix it. Do you see spurious passes on some host? -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=886 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/886] New: gas/mmix/relax2 fails
Comparison between Mon Apr 11 12:40:45 CEST 2005 Mon Apr 11 10:40:45 UTC 2005 and Mon Apr 11 20:06:38 CEST 2005 Mon Apr 11 18:06:38 UTC 2005 Tests that now fail, but worked before: gas/mmix/relax2 Discussed on the mailing lists. -- Summary: gas/mmix/relax2 fails Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: hp at sourceware dot org ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mmix-* http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=886 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
