[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-28 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |2.29

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-28 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
(In reply to wbx from comment #16)
> works great. Thanks.

Great.  Thanks again for your patience.

> Might be a candidate for 2.28 stable branch :)

Agreed and that request was indeed made in the message to the mailing list,
with CC to the release manager, whose acceptance I believe is required
post-release.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-28 Thread wbx at openadk dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #16 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
works great. Thanks.
Might be a candidate for 2.28 stable branch :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-28 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
A link to the commit is available above and the reporter CC:ed on the message
to the mailing list.

Reporter, while I have no doubt that the issue s fully fixed, I await your
confirmation before closing the issue.

Observation: readelf says the DSO after the patch is identical to that of just
deleting the annoying assert. :)  The test-case I added is not known to make a
difference in that regard; I just followed the observations from following the
original case.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=086554e8e6b222518f12acab34e6cc7b5af7fde7

commit 086554e8e6b222518f12acab34e6cc7b5af7fde7
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson 
Date:   Tue Mar 28 23:43:09 2017 +0200

Fix for PR ld/16044: elf32-cris.c h->plt.refcount inconsistency

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-13 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
Repeated, thanks.  Fix forthcoming.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-13 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
Created attachment 9899
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9899=edit
uclibc_nonshared.a

Reports should not rely on the contents of external sites, so I've extracted
the relevant test-case information. Assuming these files were correctly
uploaded despite the attachment-types mishap, they're the preferred means to
repeat the bug together with the command-line parameters (to e.g. ld-new):

--eh-frame-hdr -mcrislinux -shared -o libuClibc-1.0.22.so -mcrislinux
--warn-common --warn-once -z combreloc -O2 -z defs -O1 --version-script
libc.map -init __uClibc_init -soname=libc.so.1 --whole-archive libc_so.a
--no-whole-archive interp.os ld-uClibc.so.1 uclibc_nonshared.a
libpthread_nonshared.a libgcc.a

And yes, I could have tarred them together.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-12 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
Created attachment 9897
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9897=edit
libgcc.a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-12 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
Created attachment 9896
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9896=edit
libc_so.a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-12 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
Created attachment 9895
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9895=edit
libc.map

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-12 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
Created attachment 9894
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9894=edit
ld-uClibc.so.1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-11 Thread wbx at openadk dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #5 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Missing files and log added.

For the ld verbose output:
https://debug.openadk.org/crisv10/gcc-v.log

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-11 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-11 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
(In reply to wbx from comment #1) 
> Is the assertion to strict/wrong for crisv10?

The short answer is "no".  The longer answer includes "Other things happen for
CRIS v10 than for CRIS v32 for architectural reasons, like PLTGOT to GOT
optimization."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-11 Thread hp at sourceware dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hp at sourceware dot org
   Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org   |hp at sourceware dot org

--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
(In reply to wbx from comment #2)
> Here is the build log from the toolchain, all libs involved in the final
> link and the last command output with -Wl,-M.
> 
> https://debug.openadk.org/crisv10/
> 
> It happens when the final libc.so is created.

Thanks for the report.  Some information is missing though.
Please also attach here the *linker* invocation line
(to avoid incorrect guessing from the *gcc* command line in make.log).
To find it:
Add "-v" to the gcc command line and you'll find it in the stderr output on the
last line confusingly called (not "ld" but) "collect2".  (To the peanut
gallery: I know, but this is the short version for someone to whom all this is
new.)

>From the map output at the link above (see the LOAD lines) and from the gcc
command line, I'm missing at least the files
 libc_so.a
 libc.map
in order to proceed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-10 Thread wbx at openadk dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

--- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Here is the build log from the toolchain, all libs involved in the final
link and the last command output with -Wl,-M.

https://debug.openadk.org/crisv10/

It happens when the final libc.so is created.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732

2017-03-05 Thread wbx at openadk dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044

wbx at openadk dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target||cris-linux-uclibc
   Host||x86_64-linux-gnu
Version|2.23|2.28
  Build||x86_64-linux-gnu

--- Comment #1 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Still an issue with gcc 6.3.0 and binutils 2.28.
Targeting crisv10. Just the line number changed:

/home/wbx/embedded-test/openadk/toolchain_generic-cris_uclibc-ng_crisv10/usr/lib/gcc/cris-openadk-linux-uclibc/6.3.0/../../../../cris-openadk-linux-uclibc/bin/ld:
BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.28 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2719

Can be reproduced with:
git clone git://openadk.org/git/openadk crisv10
cd crisv10
make ADK_APPLIANCE=new ADK_TARGET_ARCH=cris ADK_TARGET_CPU=crisv10 defconfig
make v

It does not happen when targeting crisv32.

Is the assertion to strict/wrong for crisv10?
/* A GOTPLT reloc, when activated, is supposed to be included into
 the PLT refcount.  */
  BFD_ASSERT (h->gotplt_refcount == 0
  || h->gotplt_refcount <= h->root.plt.refcount);

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils