Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Karol Majewski]

At first, I'd like to try to revert these two:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=2eb22fd223cd56a2dd90eda1499dadbcbfa5fad5
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=f758afb1497e9d95e564844363f23efa5a313321

and see if the problem still exists. Unfortunately I'm not capable of creating 
Windows build.



___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Simon Albrecht]

On 18.09.2016 21:04, Karol Majewski wrote:

Hi,

the problem still exists (Win7 x64, LilyPond 2.19.48) and is very annoying. Has 
tracker been created?


Sorry, I created a tracker now: 
.


Best, Simon

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[karol]

Trying to find out where the problem is. This issue occured between 2.19.18
and 2.19.19. Here's ChangeLog:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release/2.19.19-1

The issue occurs on Windows only.

Which patch is likely to be the cause of this?



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p194718.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Karol Majewski]

Hi,

the problem still exists (Win7 x64, LilyPond 2.19.48) and is very annoying. Has 
tracker been created?

Best
Karol




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Karol Majewski]

Anyway, the tracker should be created for this issue, shouldn't it?

Here's the whole topic: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-td181529.html

--Karol

> 
> So as I see it unless this behaviour is worse/different compared to
> earlier released versions *across those same platforms* - i.e. the
> behaviour is the not same as it has always been *across those same
> platforms* then it is not critical. Just very annoying, as are all bugs.
> 




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[James Lowe]

Hello,

On 08/03/16 00:38, Karol Majewski wrote:

I think that tracker has to be created for this issue. Perhaps it
should be marked as critical as one gets different output depending on
platform.


From the Contributor Guide:

--snip--

Type-Critical: normally a regression against the current stable version 
or the previous stable version. Alternatively, a regression against a 
fix developed for the current version. This does not apply where the 
“regression” occurred because a feature was removed deliberately - this 
is not a bug.


Currently, only Critical items will block a stable release.

--snip--

So as I see it unless this behaviour is worse/different compared to 
earlier released versions *across those same platforms* - i.e. the 
behaviour is the not same as it has always been *across those same 
platforms* then it is not critical. Just very annoying, as are all bugs.


--
James

---


___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Karol Majewski]

   I think that tracker has to be created for this issue. Perhaps it
   should be marked as critical as one gets different output depending on
   platform.


   Karol
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Karol Majewski]

And what about Win8 and Win10? Can someone reproduce this bug on these systems 
in 2.19.37?




___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[karol]

For some reason this bug still occurs on Win7.

\version "2.19.37"

\transpose c c' {
  \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
  R1*8
}

\transpose c c' {
  \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
  R1*8
} 


And there are errors:
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 109.460140
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 100.651829
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 91.929924
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 109.460140
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 98.694506
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 99.404920
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 102.115387
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 102.825890
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 103.535083
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 109.502645
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.212017
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.921771
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 112.632840
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 113.342940
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 114.053048
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 114.762664
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.472344
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 112.182904
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 112.182904
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 99.404920
continuing, cross fingers

ttt.pdf <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n188186/ttt.pdf>  



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p188186.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[James]

Hello,

On 08/10/15 17:46, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 08/10/15 17:26, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> 2015-10-08 16:34 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
>> :
>>> Hi All,
>>> I'm facing the same problem today, still using Win8:
>>>
>>> \version "2.19.28"
>>>
>>> {
>>>   a'4 a'8. fis'16 d'4 d'
>>>   g'4 g' a'8\rest \slashedGrace d' g'\noBeam fis' e'
>>>   \break
>>>   \grace cis''8
>>>   e''4 8. cis''16 a'4 a'
>>>   b'4 4 a16 b' b b'
>>>   cis' cis'' d' d''
>>>   %\break
>>>   s1 s
>>> }
>>>
>>> Warnings:
>>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 107.637997
>>>
>>> continuing, cross fingers
>>>
>>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352
>>>
>>> continuing, cross fingers
>>>
>>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 120.031729
>>>
>>> continuing, cross fingers
>>>
>>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189
>>>
>>> continuing, cross fingers
>>>
>>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189
>>>
>>> continuing, cross fingers
>>>
>>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352
>>>
>>> continuing, cross fingers
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-09-22 23:50 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
>>>
 Works fine on Ubuntu 15.04, 64 bit, lilypond 2.19.27.

 Andrew

>> Still works fine on Linux.
>>
>> The error message was introduced with the fix for issue 4448
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Harm
>>
> This doesn't work on Windows 8.1 either. I get the same error as Pierre
> for the latest development.
>
> James
>
I did some more testing and it first occurs on 2_19_22.

2_19_21 gives me some odd 'assert' error just trying to run LP (which
was probably discussed previously and it is fixed now).

James

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Schneidy]

Hi All,

Form some reason, the alignment is now correct for the full score. 
Trying to find out what's happening, I've added a tablature and discovered
that the problem remains only for the 'moderntab' clef.
I've tried to reproduce that in a tiny example without success so here are
some screen shots.
Cheers,
~Pierre
grace.jpg <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n182192/grace.jpg>  
grace-tab.jpg
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n182192/grace-tab.jpg>  
grace-modern-tab.jpg
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n182192/grace-modern-tab.jpg>  



-
~Pierre
--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p182192.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Pierre Perol-Schneider]

Hi All,
I'm facing the same problem today, still using Win8:

\version "2.19.28"

{
  a'4 a'8. fis'16 d'4 d'
  g'4 g' a'8\rest \slashedGrace d' g'\noBeam fis' e'
  \break
  \grace cis''8
  e''4 8. cis''16 a'4 a'
  b'4 4 a16 b' b b'
  cis' cis'' d' d''
  %\break
  s1 s
}

Warnings:
programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 107.637997

continuing, cross fingers

programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352

continuing, cross fingers

programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 120.031729

continuing, cross fingers

programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189

continuing, cross fingers

programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189

continuing, cross fingers

programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352

continuing, cross fingers


2015-09-22 23:50 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :

> Works fine on Ubuntu 15.04, 64 bit, lilypond 2.19.27.
>
> Andrew
>
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Thomas Morley]

2015-10-08 16:34 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
:
> Hi All,
> I'm facing the same problem today, still using Win8:
>
> \version "2.19.28"
>
> {
>   a'4 a'8. fis'16 d'4 d'
>   g'4 g' a'8\rest \slashedGrace d' g'\noBeam fis' e'
>   \break
>   \grace cis''8
>   e''4 8. cis''16 a'4 a'
>   b'4 4 a16 b' b b'
>   cis' cis'' d' d''
>   %\break
>   s1 s
> }
>
> Warnings:
> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 107.637997
>
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352
>
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 120.031729
>
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189
>
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189
>
> continuing, cross fingers
>
> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352
>
> continuing, cross fingers
>
>
> 2015-09-22 23:50 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
>
>> Works fine on Ubuntu 15.04, 64 bit, lilypond 2.19.27.
>>
>> Andrew
>>


Still works fine on Linux.

The error message was introduced with the fix for issue 4448


Cheers,
  Harm

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[James]

Hello,

On 08/10/15 17:26, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2015-10-08 16:34 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
> :
>> Hi All,
>> I'm facing the same problem today, still using Win8:
>>
>> \version "2.19.28"
>>
>> {
>>   a'4 a'8. fis'16 d'4 d'
>>   g'4 g' a'8\rest \slashedGrace d' g'\noBeam fis' e'
>>   \break
>>   \grace cis''8
>>   e''4 8. cis''16 a'4 a'
>>   b'4 4 a16 b' b b'
>>   cis' cis'' d' d''
>>   %\break
>>   s1 s
>> }
>>
>> Warnings:
>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 107.637997
>>
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352
>>
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 120.031729
>>
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189
>>
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 129.062189
>>
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>> programming error: mis-predicted force, 108.120472 ~= 111.002352
>>
>> continuing, cross fingers
>>
>>
>> 2015-09-22 23:50 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard :
>>
>>> Works fine on Ubuntu 15.04, 64 bit, lilypond 2.19.27.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>
> Still works fine on Linux.
>
> The error message was introduced with the fix for issue 4448
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Harm
>
This doesn't work on Windows 8.1 either. I get the same error as Pierre
for the latest development.

James

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Simon Albrecht]

On 22.09.2015 18:47, tisimst wrote:


On 9/22/2015 10:43 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:

tisimst <[hidden email]
> writes:


On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:

Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email]
> writes:


I'm not top posting

Hi Squad,

When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:

%%
\version "2.19.27"

\transpose c c' {
   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
   R1*8
}

\transpose c c' {
   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
   R1*8
}
%%

Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures

without

the grace notes in them.

Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
talking about?

I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the
same score):



The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it
should.

- Abraham


fbbigajb.png (87K)




Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system.  So where's the difference?
64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)?  Different fonts
(less likely)?

Sounds like it might be OS-specific. I'm on Windows 7, 64-bit, LilyPond
2.19.27, using default fonts.


Everything fine with me:
Ubuntu 14.04, 64-bit, Lily 2.19.27, default fonts as well.

Yours, Simon

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[David Kastrup]

tisimst  writes:

> On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email] 
>> > writes:
>>
>> >>I'm not top posting
>> >
>> > Hi Squad,
>> >
>> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
>> >
>> > %%
>> > \version "2.19.27"
>> >
>> > \transpose c c' {
>> >   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
>> >   R1*8
>> > }
>> >
>> > \transpose c c' {
>> >   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
>> >   R1*8
>> > }
>> > %%
>>
>> Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
>> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures without
>> the grace notes in them.
>>
>> Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
>> talking about?
>
> I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the 
> same score):
>
>
>
> The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it 
> should.
>
> - Abraham
>
>
> fbbigajb.png (87K)
> 

Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system.  So where's the difference?
64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)?  Different fonts
(less likely)?

-- 
David Kastrup

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[tisimst]

On 9/22/2015 10:43 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> tisimst <[hidden email] 
> > writes:
>
> > On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> >> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email]
> >> > writes:
> >>
> >> >>I'm not top posting
> >> >
> >> > Hi Squad,
> >> >
> >> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
> >> >
> >> > %%
> >> > \version "2.19.27"
> >> >
> >> > \transpose c c' {
> >> >   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
> >> >   R1*8
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > \transpose c c' {
> >> >   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
> >> >   R1*8
> >> > }
> >> > %%
> >>
> >> Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
> >> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures 
> without
> >> the grace notes in them.
> >>
> >> Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
> >> talking about?
> >
> > I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the
> > same score):
> >
> >
> >
> > The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it
> > should.
> >
> > - Abraham
> >
> >
> > fbbigajb.png (87K)
> > 
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png>
>
> Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system.  So where's the difference?
> 64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)?  Different fonts
> (less likely)?

Sounds like it might be OS-specific. I'm on Windows 7, 64-bit, LilyPond 
2.19.27, using default fonts.

- Abraham




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p181540.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Andrew Bernard]

Works fine on Ubuntu 15.04, 64 bit, lilypond 2.19.27.

Andrew

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[David Kastrup]

Pierre Perol-Schneider  writes:

>>I'm not top posting
>
> Hi Squad,
>
> When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
>
> %%
> \version "2.19.27"
>
> \transpose c c' {
>   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
>   R1*8
> }
>
> \transpose c c' {
>   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
>   R1*8
> }
> %%

Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures without
the grace notes in them.

Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
talking about?

-- 
David Kastrup

___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[tisimst]

On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email] 
> > writes:
>
> >>I'm not top posting
> >
> > Hi Squad,
> >
> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
> >
> > %%
> > \version "2.19.27"
> >
> > \transpose c c' {
> >   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
> >   R1*8
> > }
> >
> > \transpose c c' {
> >   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
> >   R1*8
> > }
> > %%
>
> Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures without
> the grace notes in them.
>
> Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
> talking about?

I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the 
same score):



The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it 
should.

- Abraham


fbbigajb.png (87K) 
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png>




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p181536.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[Pierre Perol-Schneider]

>I'm not top posting

Hi Squad,

When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:

%%
\version "2.19.27"

\transpose c c' {
  \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
  R1*8
}

\transpose c c' {
  \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
  R1*8
}
%%

Cheers,
Pierre
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond