Re: Two possible "ugly bugs"
Hi Keith, Thanks for your reply, for the workarounds and for the report. Also, I totally understand your point concerning my 2) Take care, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Two-possible-ugly-bugs-tp152775p152858.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Two possible "ugly bugs"
Hi Phil, Thanks for your reply. As I am new to bug reporting, I sometimes still get confused about it (all my other reports have been filled by others after I posted them in the User forum, or someone directly asked me to post something at the bug tracker). I will always report bugs via the gmane interface here, never directly. Take care, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Two-possible-ugly-bugs-tp152775p152857.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Two possible "ugly bugs"
Gilberto Agostinho gmail.com> writes:
> 1) Some ugly positioning when using \pitchedTrill:
This was from an intentional change to place things as close as they fit
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2527
but it should have come with padding.
I added http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3630
A good workaround is
\override TrillPitchGroup #'horizon-padding = #0.10
> 2) This one I am a bit less sure if it is not happening due to some
misuse
> of mine. I am trying to get completely flat beams by using \override
> Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0 (as far as I understand, the higher the value
of
> the concaveness the flatter are the beams). So it works well for almost
> every group of notes, EXCEPT when there is a note and a rest beamed
> together:
> { \override Beam.concaveness = #+inf.0
> \time 12/8
> a'8[ r d'] e8[ r r] a,8[ r r] a'''8[ r r] }
I hesitate to enter a bug report for this.
The 'concaveness' is meant to describe the pattern of note-heads where
traditionally we prefer horizontal beams. The rest moves in response to
the beam, so for a beam between a single note and rest I am not surprised
that 'concaveness' has no effect -- the single note cannot have a concave
pattern so 'concaveness' is not checked.
Maybe Beam.damping = +inf.0 should make the beam horizontal for a rest and
note beamed together (it does not work currently).
You can use
\once\override Beam.positions = #'(0 . 0)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Re: Two possible "ugly bugs"
"Gilberto Agostinho" wrote in message news:loom.20131021t190155-...@post.gmane.org... Here are two possible little bugs (of type ugly) that do not look well IMO. If you give me green light, I would happily add them to our Issue Tracker myself. Please don't. If you do want to help out with bug handling, we would welcome your assistance as a member of the Bug Squad, and would add you to the tracker as a member to allow you to add bugs correctly. -- Phil Holmes Bug Squad ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
