Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[Magnus Holm]

2011/9/24 Bartosz Dziewoński matma@gmail.com:
 So, are we reverting it? It's still in the latest GitHub commit.

I've reverted it.
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[Bartosz Dziewoński]

So, are we reverting it? It's still in the latest GitHub commit.

(If it was unclear, I agree with Jenna - while certainly neat, this should go.)

-- Matma Rex
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Feature: Simple controllers?

[Magnus Holm]

I just pushed a new feature to Camping: Simple controllers.

  module App::Controllers
get '/(.*)' do |name|
  Hello #{name}
end
  end

What do you think? Useful? Or should I revert it? It currently costs
us 87 bytes.

// Magnus Holm
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[Bartosz Dziewoński]

Personally I probably won't be using it, I like having class names
around and being able to link to them with R(). (I change my paths
often.) Certainly won't hurt to have it, for really small apps.

-- Matma Rex
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[John Beppu]

If I wanted that notation, I'd just use Sinatra.  ;)

Like Bartosz, I like having named controllers so that I can pass them to R()
when generating links.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Magnus Holm judo...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just pushed a new feature to Camping: Simple controllers.

  module App::Controllers
get '/(.*)' do |name|
  Hello #{name}
end
  end

 What do you think? Useful? Or should I revert it? It currently costs
 us 87 bytes.

 // Magnus Holm
 ___
 Camping-list mailing list
 Camping-list@rubyforge.org
 http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[Magnus Holm]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 21:28, David Susco dsu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Would you have to write the RE for every declaration?

 ie...

  module App::Controllers
   get '/(.*)' do |name|
     Hello #{name}
   end

   put '/(.*)' do |name|
     Hello #{name}
   end
  end

That wouldn't work. Camping would dispatch all methods to the first
controller (so you'll get a 501 error when you PUT).  In that case
you'll have to refactor it into a proper controller. Which I consider
a good thing (DRY etc.)
___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[Jenna Fox]

I vote revert. This is just sinatra - I feel it's important camping maintains 
the cleanliness and clarity of functionality given to us by using simple 
classes. It's something we have which AFAIK no other ruby web framework does - 
you know exactly how it works, because it's just a class.


On 26/08/2011, at 7:21 AM, Magnus Holm wrote:

 On Aug 25, 2011 10:54 PM, John Beppu john.be...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  If I wanted that notation, I'd just use Sinatra.  ;)
 
  Like Bartosz, I like having named controllers so that I can pass them to 
  R() when generating links.
 
 Does it make it better that you can name them too?
 
   Index = get / do
 ...
   end
 
 Sent from my iCampingPhone 
 ___
 Camping-list mailing list
 Camping-list@rubyforge.org
 http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

Re: Feature: Simple controllers?

[John Beppu]

Being able to name controllers definitely makes it more valuable.  If I had
to criticize Sinatra and its clones, I would criticize their lack of named
controllers.  It's difficult to write URL generation functions without them.
 I've only seen one Sinatra clone (Slim in php) that allows controllers to
be named.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Magnus Holm judo...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Aug 25, 2011 10:54 PM, John Beppu john.be...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  If I wanted that notation, I'd just use Sinatra.  ;)
 
  Like Bartosz, I like having named controllers so that I can pass them to
 R() when generating links.

 Does it make it better that you can name them too?

   Index = get / do
 ...
   end

 Sent from my iCampingPhone

 ___
 Camping-list mailing list
 Camping-list@rubyforge.org
 http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list

___
Camping-list mailing list
Camping-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list