Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread wilfred d'souza 
Guys,

How about this...

Phone
  1 
  Line1
  : 3001 
  Line2
  : 3101 
    
  Phone
  2 
  Line1
  : 3002 
  Line2
  : 3102 
     
  If
  GDM extn is 3005, then  
     
  ephone-dn 3
number 3005 secondary 3101

ephone-dn 4
number 3005 secondary 3102

ephone 1
button 1:1 2m3

ephone 2 
button 1:2 2m4

I guess this would work correct?

Thanks,
Wilfred



--- On Wed, 10/6/09, wilfred d'souza  wrote:

From: wilfred d'souza 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" , "Cristi 
Radescu" 
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:45 PM

ooh yes... my bad... 



--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "wilfred d'souza" , 
"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:25 PM






 

 







Wilfred, you can not configure 2
extensions after „m”. 

You can monitor only one extension. 

   









From:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilfred d'souza

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
6:43 AM

To: Michael Ciarfello;
 Cliff McGlamry ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ;
Cristi Radescu

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 



   


 
  
  Guys,

  

  How about monitor? For example  
  Phone
  1 
  Line1
  : 3001 
  Line2
  : 3101 
    
  Phone
  2 
  Line1
  : 3002 
  Line2
  : 3102 
     
  If
  GDM extn is 3005, then  
     
  ephone
  1 
  button
  1:1 2m5,3 
     
  ephone
  2 
  button
  1:2  2m5,4 
     
  Lemme
  know if this works... I dont have it setup right now else would have tested
  it but if i remember it I think I had accomplished this 
     
  Thanks, 
  Wilfred 
  

  

  --- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu 
  wrote: 
  

  From: Cristi Radescu 

  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
  2phones

  To: "Michael Ciarfello" , "
 Cliff McGlamry " ,
  " ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com "
  < ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >

  Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:05 AM 
  
  
  I will say „NO” too. 
  I tested many scenarios that came in my mind without a positive
  result. 
  If you cofigure overlay as Cliff suggested, you must put it as
  first extension after „o” in order for envelope to show on both phones. But
  if you will do this, you will modify the look of the phone(second line will
  show this extension). 
    
  
  
  
  
  From: Michael Ciarfello
  [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 

  Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
  5:45 AM

  To: Cliff
   McGlamry ; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
  GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
    
  
  Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying
  the answer so far is NO? 
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  From:
  ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
  On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
  [cl...@mcglamry.net]

  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009
  3:47 PM

  To: Cristi Radescu;
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
  GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
  
  
  Actually,
  you might be able to do it if it is on CME. 
  
  
    
  
  
  Assign
  button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay
  ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet
  that would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.   
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  From: Cristi Radescu  
  
  
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM 
  
  
  To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'  
  
  
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
  configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
  
  
    
  
  
    
  I think this is not possible. With „secondary number” or
  „overlay” it will not work. 
    
  
  
  
  
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil

  Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM

  To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'

  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
  configuration with notification on 2 phones 
  
    
  Hi, 
    
  I
  want to know if it’s possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line
  of 2 phones without changing the phone facing. 
    
  Example: 
    
  Phone
  1 
  Line1
  : 3001 
  Line2
  : 3101 
    
  Phone
  2 
  Line1
  : 3002 
  Line2
  : 3102 
    
  Each
  line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I
  need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone. 
  Can’t
  have line 3 
  Can’t
  modify the look of the phone 
    
  It’s
  possible? If yes, how ? 
    
  Thanks 
  David Corbeil 

  Consultant
  en technologie | Technology Consultant 

  Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333 

  Membre de
  l’équipe TELUS  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
 


   







New Email names for you! 

Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail.

Hurry before some

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread wilfred d'souza 
ooh yes... my bad... 



--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "wilfred d'souza" , 
"ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 2:25 PM






 

 







Wilfred, you can not configure 2
extensions after „m”. 

You can monitor only one extension. 

   









From:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilfred d'souza

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
6:43 AM

To: Michael Ciarfello;
 Cliff McGlamry ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ;
Cristi Radescu

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 



   


 
  
  Guys,

  

  How about monitor? For example  
  Phone
  1 
  Line1
  : 3001 
  Line2
  : 3101 
    
  Phone
  2 
  Line1
  : 3002 
  Line2
  : 3102 
     
  If
  GDM extn is 3005, then  
     
  ephone
  1 
  button
  1:1 2m5,3 
     
  ephone
  2 
  button
  1:2  2m5,4 
     
  Lemme
  know if this works... I dont have it setup right now else would have tested
  it but if i remember it I think I had accomplished this 
     
  Thanks, 
  Wilfred 
  

  

  --- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu 
  wrote: 
  

  From: Cristi Radescu 

  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
  2phones

  To: "Michael Ciarfello" , "
 Cliff McGlamry " ,
  " ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com "
  < ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >

  Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:05 AM 
  
  
  I will say „NO” too. 
  I tested many scenarios that came in my mind without a positive
  result. 
  If you cofigure overlay as Cliff suggested, you must put it as
  first extension after „o” in order for envelope to show on both phones. But
  if you will do this, you will modify the look of the phone(second line will
  show this extension). 
    
  
  
  
  
  From: Michael Ciarfello
  [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 

  Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
  5:45 AM

  To: Cliff
   McGlamry ; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
  GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
    
  
  Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying
  the answer so far is NO? 
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  From:
  ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
  On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
  [cl...@mcglamry.net]

  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009
  3:47 PM

  To: Cristi Radescu;
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
  GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
  
  
  Actually,
  you might be able to do it if it is on CME. 
  
  
    
  
  
  Assign
  button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay
  ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet
  that would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.   
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
  From: Cristi Radescu  
  
  
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM 
  
  
  To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'  
  
  
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
  configuration with notification on 2phones 
  
  
  
    
  
  
    
  I think this is not possible. With „secondary number” or
  „overlay” it will not work. 
    
  
  
  
  
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil

  Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM

  To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'

  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
  configuration with notification on 2 phones 
  
    
  Hi, 
    
  I
  want to know if it’s possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line
  of 2 phones without changing the phone facing. 
    
  Example: 
    
  Phone
  1 
  Line1
  : 3001 
  Line2
  : 3101 
    
  Phone
  2 
  Line1
  : 3002 
  Line2
  : 3102 
    
  Each
  line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I
  need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone. 
  Can’t
  have line 3 
  Can’t
  modify the look of the phone 
    
  It’s
  possible? If yes, how ? 
    
  Thanks 
  David Corbeil 

  Consultant
  en technologie | Technology Consultant 

  Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333 

  Membre de
  l’équipe TELUS  
    
  
  
  
  
  
  
 


   







New Email names for you! 

Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail.

Hurry before someone else does! 



 




  New Email names for you! 
Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail. 
Hurry before someone else does!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/sg/

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP endpoints on the other side of an H.323 trunk...

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Found a weird statement in a Cisco doc:

"SIP endpoints are not supported on H.323 trunks. SIP endpoints are
supported on SIP trunks only"

This was in the SRST System Admin guide under Octo-Lines...

I thought the CUBE fixed this?


Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread Cristi Radescu 
Wilfred, you can not configure 2 extensions after "m".
You can monitor only one extension.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilfred d'souza
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:43 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; Cliff McGlamry; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Cristi 
Radescu
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Guys,

How about monitor? For example
Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

If GDM extn is 3005, then

ephone 1
button 1:1 2m5,3

ephone 2
button 1:2  2m5,4

Lemme know if this works... I dont have it setup right now else would have 
tested it but if i remember it I think I had accomplished this

Thanks,
Wilfred


--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "Michael Ciarfello" , "Cliff McGlamry" 
, "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 

Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:05 AM
I will say "NO" too.
I tested many scenarios that came in my mind without a positive result.
If you cofigure overlay as Cliff suggested, you must put it as first extension 
after "o" in order for envelope to show on both phones. But if you will do 
this, you will modify the look of the phone(second line will show this 
extension).


From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 5:45 AM
To: Cliff McGlamry; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
[cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME.

Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay 
ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet that 
would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.

From: Cristi Radescu
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM
To: 
'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones


I think this is not possible. With "secondary number" or "overlay" it will not 
work.


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil
Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM
To: 
'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

Hi,

I want to know if it's possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line 
of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

Example:

Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I 
need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.
Can't have line 3
Can't modify the look of the phone

It's possible? If yes, how ?

Thanks

David Corbeil
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333
Membre de l'équipe TELUS




New Email names for you! 

Get the Email name you've always wanted on the new @ymail and @rocketmail.
Hurry before someone else does!

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN Emulation vs3 lab

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Yes.

I am using a Cisco 3725 with an AIM-VOICE-30 (for DSPs), it has two T1
PRIs and one E1 PRI (never could figure out how to emulate an E1 R2).

It also has an NM-32A for Console access to the Cisco racks and it is
our frame-relay switch...

Just set your PRI to emulate network side and use a T1 crossover to
connect em...

Oh, it is also running CCME for the PSTN phones


Jonathan

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:25 PM, J Hogan wrote:
> Hello Everyone
>
>    Is there anyway to do PSTN emulation with routers? I believe I can do
> some type of POTS emulation but what about T1 PSTN emulation? I have some
> E&M modules.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> --
> J. Hogan MCP,CCDA,CCDP, CCNA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI
> Yahoo ID: jhogan552000
> AIM ID: jhogan55
> MSN ID: jhogan55
> ICQ ID: 257599283
>
> Live Life And Do Not Kill Time.
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Best Cisco Phone Options for v3 Blueprint

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
'Full SIP features', in the context of Cisco, means 'about 80% of the
features of a SCCP phone...'

And you need to know what those limitations are.


J

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Michael
Ciarfello wrote:
> You should probably have 79x0 and either 79x1 and/or 79x2s.  The 79x0s for
> the lack of SIP features and knowing how to deal with them and the 79x1 or
> 79x2s for full SIP features.
>
> The x2s have g722-64 codec and ILBC codec.
>
> My definition of:
> x0 means 7940 and 7960
> x1 means 7941 and 7961  (this should also include 7970) which has most of
> SIP features
> x2 means 7942 and 7962 and also 7945 and 7965
>
> The end-user guides for each phone type tell you which SCCP and SIP features
> are supported on what models.
>
> 
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jason Granat
> [...@slash128.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:45 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Best Cisco Phone Options for v3 Blueprint
>
> I wish the v3 hardware blueprint called it out but all it says is 'IP Phones
> and Soft Clients'. Soft clients are easy enough to download but any thoughts
> on whether or not 7960's are sufficient for study or should i invest in some
> newer models?
> Thanks!
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Best Cisco Phone Options for v3 Blueprint

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Yes, get some 7961s as the 7960s do not support the native CUCM
presence (BLF for call lists, etc...)

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> I wish the v3 hardware blueprint called it out but all it says is 'IP Phones
> and Soft Clients'. Soft clients are easy enough to download but any thoughts
> on whether or not 7960's are sufficient for study or should i invest in some
> newer models?
> Thanks!
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM 7.1.2 7960 SIP Registration Rejected

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Seen anything weird with 7.1?

Was debating on upgrading our development gear... just to screw with
the UCCX guys


Jonathan

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Jason Granat wrote:
> Since it appears the OSL mailer is back online I wanted to share that this
> was a simple boneheaded mistake. During my upgrade haste I forgot to reset
> my DHCP option 150 and the phones were trying to register with the sub that
> had not yet been upgraded. Anyway, I was able to register my 7960 phones as
> SIP endpoints with 7.1.2.
> Hope my mistake was helpful to someone :-)
>
> On Jun 6, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Jason Granat wrote:
>
> I upgraded to CUCM 7.1.2 yesterday and my 7960’s that were previously
> registered as SIP endpoints in 7.0 are now getting registration rejected. I
> tried reverting back to Skinny (which worked) and back to SIP and also tried
> adding new 7960’s as SIP but still get reg rej. Does anyone know if there is
> an incompatibility with 7960’s as SIP endpoints in 7.1.2?
>
> A note on 7.1.2 on VMWare: every reboot the system will pause during the
> boot cycle to warn that it detects VMWare and you must agree that it is not
> a production system, so you can’t just reboot and wait for it to come up.
> You have to agree every time.
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>
>
> 
>
> http://slash128.com
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Quick way to wipe voicemail from ALL mailboxes.

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
MSM lets you annihilate everything.


Jonathan

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Scott ODonnell wrote:
> Does anyone know of a way to wipe all voicemails from a single or ALL
> mailboxes quickly.
> After messing around with various configs, I end up with a lot of messages
> to delete.
> Is there anything in Cisco unity tool depot?
> - Scott
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM CUE 7 to CUC 7

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Yeah, I have the same thing, an NFR NME-CUE... no VPIM... I can prob
send an email to my Cisco dude and see if he will send me a demo
license


Jonathan

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Mohammed-Nour wrote:
> I tried this on my lab,
> CUE 7 configuration is straightford just follow the SRND the same with
> CUC 7
> Only problem I found was Licence for VMIM in CUC 7. The DEMO/NFR kit
> dont have it.
>
> Configuration should be similar to V2
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Charles
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:49 PM
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM CUE 7 to CUC 7
>
> Anyone have a primer on this?
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> __
> This email has been scanned and checked by Netlink Group's Managed Email
> service
> __
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 1760 Routers

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
No.

However, you can use a 2501...

Or, you can use GNS3


Jonathan

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Amp wrote:
> Hey gang I was wondering, is it possible to use a 1760-v router as a
> gatekeeper? I have a 2611XM, a 3640, and two 1760-v routers and I am trying
> to figure out what limitations (if any) I'll have with these routers as I
> try to simulate the IPexpert lab topology. Thanks a million.
>
> Amp
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM CUE 7 to CUC 7

2009-06-09 Thread Mohammed-Nour 
I tried this on my lab,
CUE 7 configuration is straightford just follow the SRND the same with
CUC 7
Only problem I found was Licence for VMIM in CUC 7. The DEMO/NFR kit
dont have it.

Configuration should be similar to V2

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Charles
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:49 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM CUE 7 to CUC 7

Anyone have a primer on this?


Jonathan

__
This email has been scanned and checked by Netlink Group's Managed Email
service
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 - DHCP on CUCM 7

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Do you have DHCP snooping enabled on your switch?

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:58 AM, ctpresident
ctpresident wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> This is going to sound bizzarre! And maybe, a little amateurish. But for
> some reason, I cannot get dhcp on cucm 7 to dish out IP's! If I enable it on
> a router or switch, no problem. I know this is the most basic of functions,
> but it's bugging me insanely.
>
> At the moment (to get going with labs) I'm running dhcp off my router. The
> dhcp monitor service is started, and I've restarted cucm service. I've got
> the dhcp helper-address on the correct vlan, and have even tried on a
> completely flat network. No go.
>
> Like I said, if I put any other dhcp server on the same subnet, all is good.
>
> BTW, I'm running it off the pub, haven't tested on the sub, but doubt that
> will make a change. Server is added as dhcp server, and approriate scopes
> created. Is there some "hidden" service that I need to activate?
>
> Urgh! Any advise will help.
>
> Thanks! Great forum by the way!!!
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
"If you are incorporated (most people in America are)"

Most companies are... most people are not... we just work for
corporations that suck out our soul and destroy any desire to continue
living...

I work for an LLC.


Jonathan


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Tech Guy wrote:
> Anyone can get a CCO account and maybe place the order; but after placing
> the order, they will have to verify your qualification (i.e must be a
> partner or working for a partner) before the kit can be shipped to you.
>
> If you are incorporated (most people in America are); you can registered as
> a Cisco partner after creating your CCO account, then you will be able to
> order the kit, I have colleagues who have done it that way.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tech Guy
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Amp" 
> To: 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install
>
>
> If you have a CCO account, you can go to Cisco Marketplace and order
> the NFR kit; I believe it is $275 USD.
> Quoting "Padmanabhan, Padhu" :
>
>> How did you get nfr kit ? Through cisco am ?
>> --
>> Sent using BlackBerry
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> 
>> To: Frank Costeira ; KatGuru 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ;
>> Michael Ciarfello 
>> Sent: Mon Jun 01 20:30:24 2009
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install
>>
>> I have Presence installed and Fully functioning In VMware a well, the
>> NFR (Demo) Pack comes with 2 User and 2 Node License.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Mohammed
>>
>> Support +61 8 6380 1955 | supp...@netlinkgroup.com.au
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Frank
>> Costeira
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:03 AM
>> To: KatGuru
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Michael Ciarfello
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  Does CUPS come with a demo licenses for vmware?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On May 23, 2009, at 2:01 PM, KatGuru wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I haven't tried VM yet. Let me try and let you know guys.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all your answers.
>>>
>>> --- On Sat, 5/23/09, Michael Ciarfello  wrote:
>>>
 From: Michael Ciarfello 
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install
 To: "ccieid1ot" 
 Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
 Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 10:46 AM
 Yep, that's one of the things about
 the new Linux appliances..  The hardware support is
 really strict.  Try an IBM or HP branded server
 equalivent and you'll go crazy.  But it's a LOT better
 than customers installing stuff on the windows boxes and
 wondering why the server doesn't work anymore and you spend
 all night fixing it (basically reinstalling.)

 If for a lab, install VMWARE on it like stated below and
 run multiple applications on it.  The 7845 would be a
 pretty nice box for a VMWare machine.  We have two in
 our demo racks with Raid5, more memory, etc.  Pretty
 speedy.

 If for production, must order another server.  No way
 around it.  And you wouldn't want to go around it
 anyways.

 
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of ccieid1ot [ccieid...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 5:28 PM
 To: KatGuru
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

 VMWARE

 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM, KatGuru 
 wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install Presence for my lab. I've

 MCS-7845-H3-IPC1 but its kicking me out with "HW is not
 supported" error. Is there any work around to use the same
 server to install the CUPS?
>
> In HP 7845 Cisco recommended only the following.
> MCS-7845-H2-IPC1
> MCS-7845-H2-IPC2
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> This email has been scanned and checked by Netlink Group's Managed Email
>> service
>> __
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Changes to the TCL B-ACD/DID/Fax Onramp Offramp in CCME v7.0

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Are there any? Can I use the materials I used for the CCM 4.1 version
of the lab?


Jonathan

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM CUE 7 to CUC 7

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Anyone have a primer on this?


Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Cool.

I have a lab date of July 27th, so, to confirm, there will be a
complete set of labs (testing all components of the blueprint) by 30
JUNE.


Jonathan

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Larry Hadrava wrote:
> OK Gang - just spoke with Mark.
> He wanted me to let all of you know that the labs will start to be released
> toward the end of next week and will keep coming until Vol 1 is finished.
> I can tell you that you will not be disappointed.
>
> I have reviewed some of the other vendors materials and can tell you that
> they are lacking in comparison. One vendors materials doesn't even have
> troubleshooting labs for each technology
>
> So keep watching the blog, twitter and the forum and we'll let you know when
> the new labs are being released.
>
> Thanks
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Aamir Panjwani
>  wrote:
>>
>> As per latest newsletter all 13 labs will be released on 30th June. Which
>> is great, however, my understanding was that labs will be released one by
>> one as they are being developed. It would be really helpful if possible to
>> release lab 6,7 etc. now so we don’t have to wait for another 3 weeks for
>> full volume 1 to be published.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry Hadrava
>> Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:34 AM
>> To: Nara Shikamaru
>> Cc: OSL Group; Phillip Smith
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm checking on this for you.
>>
>> Larry Hadrava
>> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
>> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?  I
>> was under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released in
>> time for the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>> __
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> __
>>
>> __
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>> __
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch for CCIE Voice Home Lab

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
The 2970/3560 and 3750 use the same QoS model, so yes.

>From a marketing perspective, the 3750 could also have a WLC built in...

But yes, an 8-port 3560 should suffice.

J

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Russ Meuchel wrote:
> This is a follow up to my 2960 post.  I was unaware that they made a 8-port
> version of the 3560 switch - WS-C3560-8PC-S.  The 3560 and 3750 switches
> have the same capabilities to my knowledge, except that the 3750 is able to
> stack, right?
> Thanks.
> Russ

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 questions... again...

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
OK, I know this is getting tedious, but there is very little info out
there and my date is July 27th.

Are any of the following possible or likely:

Dual or quad CUPS servers.
Dual or quad UCCX servers.
External LDAP
External LCS/OCS
SIP trunk provider for PSTN access from a site

I need to remove things that are unlikely/improbable...

After going thru CUPS, there had BETTER be an LDAP on the network.



Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presence of other CUPC clients...

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
Yeah, I told the customer that, he was offended that that was all I could do...

He has a lot of users who need to not be able to send messages to
other users (mostly the IT help desk is getting pounded by IMs from
everyone who should be calling in thru UCCX).

He wants the users to not be able to send IMs or even see the status
of his help desk people if he has to have each of his IT people
block a user each time a user sends an IM, this is going to get out of
control fast...

I did find one way, but it blows (rearranging the OUs of his network)...

Now, if Cisco let you configure multiple LDAP user search bases, and
add them to a specific profile, so I could segment out the help desk
and just not add them to be searchable... that would work, but Cisco
only lets you select ONE LDAP search criterium.



Jonathan

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Priyank Kiran wrote:
> If you are using version 7.0, right click on the contact and select "Block
> Contact"
> The blocked contact should then appear under File-->Preferences-->Privacy
> list
> -Priyank
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>
>> How do you block CUPC users from seeing other CUPC users?
>>
>> I have changed Presence Groups for user A and User B so they are
>> disallowed subscriptions... I have changed SUBSCRIBE CSS to not
>> include the partition of the other user... I even changed the LDAP
>> profiles in CUPS so they couldn't see the other OU... and they can
>> still see the presence status, still send/receive IMs...
>>
>> Now, once I changed the LDAP search base on CUPS, you can no longer
>> search for the user and add em to your buddy list... but no presence
>> info is blocked...
>>
>> How do you block this for CUPC?
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Presence statuses...

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
The primary extension is set.

Both CUPC and the 7961 are associated to the user.

The user is assigned to the DN on both devices.

The user is listed as a UserID on both devices.

CUPS is 7.0(2); CUCM is 7.0(1)



Jonathan

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Priyank Kiran wrote:
> Make sure the setting for Primary Extension on the user page looks OK. If
> both the softphone and deskphone share the same extension, you should be OK
> after switching the application from softphone to deskphone.
>
> -Priyank
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>
>> OK, so we basically have three statuses...
>>
>> Available, green with a checkbox
>>
>> Idle, Yellow with a minus sign...
>>
>> and DND which is red with a slash
>>
>> How do we show that someone is on the phone? It appears to only work
>> when I make the call using the softphone... (CUPC), but if I set CUPC
>> to use the deskphone and make the call either thru the desk phone or
>> thru CUPC, I do not show as on the phone from other users...
>>
>> Control of the phone from CUPC works fine... no probs at all...
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch for CCIE Voice Home Lab

2009-06-09 Thread Russ Meuchel 
This is a follow up to my 2960 post.  I was unaware that they made a 8-port
version of the 3560 switch - WS-C3560-8PC-S.  The 3560 and 3750 switches
have the same capabilities to my knowledge, except that the 3750 is able to
stack, right?
Thanks.
Russ

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread wilfred d'souza 
Guys,

How about monitor? For example 

Phone 1 

Line1 : 3001 

Line2 : 3101 

  

Phone 2 

Line1 : 3002 

Line2 : 3102
If GDM extn is 3005, then 

ephone 1button 1:1 2m5,3
ephone 2button 1:2  2m5,4
Lemme know if this works... I dont have it setup right now else would have 
tested it but if i remember it I think I had accomplished this
Thanks,Wilfred


--- On Wed, 10/6/09, Cristi Radescu  wrote:

From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
To: "Michael Ciarfello" , "Cliff McGlamry" 
, "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 

Date: Wednesday, 10 June, 2009, 11:05 AM




 
 







I will say „NO” too. 

I tested many scenarios that came in my
mind without a positive result. 

If you cofigure overlay as Cliff
suggested, you must put it as first extension after „o” in order for
envelope to show on both phones. But if you will do this, you will modify the
look of the phone(second line will show this extension). 

   









From:
Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009
5:45 AM

To: Cliff McGlamry; Cristi
Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 



   



Did this ever get solved?  Am I
correct in saying the answer so far is NO? 





  











From:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry [cl...@mcglamry.net]

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47
PM

To: Cristi Radescu;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]
GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 







Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME. 





  





Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN
on the overlay ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never
ring, but I bet that would make the envelope appear the way being
discussed.   





  









From: Cristi Radescu  





Sent: Thursday, May
28, 2009 5:22 AM 





To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'  





Subject: Re: [OSL |
CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones 







   





  

I think this is not possible. With
„secondary number” or „overlay” it will not work. 

  









From:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil

Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM

To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
configuration with notification on 2 phones 



  

Hi, 

  

I want to know if it’s possible to have the
voicemail letter on the second line of 2 phones without changing the phone
facing. 

  

Example: 

  

Phone 1 

Line1 : 3001 

Line2 : 3101 

  

Phone 2 

Line1 : 3002 

Line2 : 3102 

  

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when
a message is left on GDM I need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone. 

Can’t have line 3 

Can’t modify the look of the phone 

  

It’s possible? If yes, how ? 

  

Thanks 

David Corbeil 

Consultant
en technologie | Technology Consultant 

Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333 

Membre de
l’équipe TELUS  

  









 




  Get your new Email address!
Grab the Email name you've always wanted before someone else does!
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/sg/

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread Cristi Radescu 
I will say "NO" too.
I tested many scenarios that came in my mind without a positive result.
If you cofigure overlay as Cliff suggested, you must put it as first extension 
after "o" in order for envelope to show on both phones. But if you will do 
this, you will modify the look of the phone(second line will show this 
extension).


From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 5:45 AM
To: Cliff McGlamry; Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
[cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones
Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME.

Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay 
ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet that 
would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.

From: Cristi Radescu
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones


I think this is not possible. With "secondary number" or "overlay" it will not 
work.


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil
Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

Hi,

I want to know if it's possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line 
of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

Example:

Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I 
need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.
Can't have line 3
Can't modify the look of the phone

It's possible? If yes, how ?

Thanks

David Corbeil
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333
Membre de l'équipe TELUS

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello 
Did this ever get solved?  Am I correct in saying the answer so far is NO?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cliff McGlamry 
[cl...@mcglamry.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Cristi Radescu; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones

Actually, you might be able to do it if it is on CME.

Assign button 2 as an overlay, and put the mailbox number DN on the overlay 
ephone-dn.  It should be hard forwarded so it will never ring, but I bet that 
would make the envelope appear the way being discussed.

From: Cristi Radescu
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:22 AM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2phones


I think this is not possible. With „secondary number” or „overlay” it will not 
work.


From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil
Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

Hi,

I want to know if it’s possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line 
of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

Example:

Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I 
need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.
Can’t have line 3
Can’t modify the look of the phone

It’s possible? If yes, how ?

Thanks

David Corbeil
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333
Membre de l’équipe TELUS

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE v3 Lab Studying

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello 
Not interested in the partner thing, but we are here.  Post your issues / 
questions / problems.  We would love to hear them.



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Russ Meuchel 
[rmeuc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 7:07 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE v3 Lab Studying

Is there anyone else out there who is planning on taking the CCIE Voice v3 Lab 
exam in the Sept / Oct timeframe?  I am going to the IP Expert 2-week bootcamp 
during the first 2 weeks of August in San Jose and taking the lab this fall.  
I'm interested in finding someone with a similar skill and dedication level.  
If anyone is interested in doing labs / studying remotely together, please 
e-mail me at rmeuc...@gmail.com.
Thanks!
Russ Meuchel

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity vmware

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello 
If your company is a Cisco partner, purchase the NFR kit.
If you are a Cisco customer, see your Cisco Account Manager or Cisco Sales 
Engineer
If you are neither, then what are you?


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA 
[adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 3:58 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity vmware

Hello,

Does anyone know how i can get unity connection vmware to use for a lab setup

THanks for the anticipated response

Cheers

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Quick way to wipe voicemail from ALL mailboxes.

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Ciarfello 
Hmmm.  Look around tools depot!

Is deleting the users and re-creating an option?

How about setting the max mailbox size to 0 in Exchange?  Then set it back?  
There might be a few more or other things in Exchange you can do.  I don't know 
Exchange well enough off the top of my head, but hopefully that provides some 
insight.

If UM, open the mailbox in Outlook and delete then empty trash.

Hope that helps.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Scott ODonnell 
[scott.odonn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:13 AM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Quick way to wipe voicemail from ALL mailboxes.

Does anyone know of a way to wipe all voicemails from a single or ALL mailboxes 
quickly.

After messing around with various configs, I end up with a lot of messages to 
delete.

Is there anything in Cisco unity tool depot?

- Scott

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Presence statuses...

2009-06-09 Thread Priyank Kiran 
Make sure the setting for Primary Extension on the user page looks OK. If
both the softphone and deskphone share the same extension, you should be OK
after switching the application from softphone to deskphone.


-Priyank



On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:

> OK, so we basically have three statuses...
>
> Available, green with a checkbox
>
> Idle, Yellow with a minus sign...
>
> and DND which is red with a slash
>
> How do we show that someone is on the phone? It appears to only work
> when I make the call using the softphone... (CUPC), but if I set CUPC
> to use the deskphone and make the call either thru the desk phone or
> thru CUPC, I do not show as on the phone from other users...
>
> Control of the phone from CUPC works fine... no probs at all...
>
>
> Jonathan
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

2009-06-09 Thread Larry Hadrava 
OK Gang - just spoke with Mark.
He wanted me to let all of you know that the labs will start to be released
toward the end of next week and will keep coming until Vol 1 is finished.
I can tell you that you will not be disappointed.

I have reviewed some of the other vendors materials and can tell you that
they are lacking in comparison. One vendors materials doesn't even have
troubleshooting labs for each technology

So keep watching the blog, twitter and the forum and we'll let you know when
the new labs are being released.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Aamir Panjwani <
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au> wrote:

>  As per latest newsletter all 13 labs will be released on 30th June. Which
> is great, however, my understanding was that labs will be released one by
> one as they are being developed. It would be really helpful if possible to
> release lab 6,7 etc. now so we don’t have to wait for another 3 weeks for
> full volume 1 to be published.
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Larry Hadrava
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:34 AM
> *To:* Nara Shikamaru
> *Cc:* OSL Group; Phillip Smith
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6
>
>
>
> I'm checking on this for you.
>
>
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com 
>
>  On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru 
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?  I
> was under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released in
> time for the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>
>
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>
> __
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups

2009-06-09 Thread Leslie Meade 
I found out how to set it up and i have struck another issue.
When I do a search I get the XML Error [4]: Parse Error. I looked at the iis 
logs and get invalid credentials
I am using the Multidirectory ASP file in the SDK from cisco. With this line 

dirs[0] = new Directory("XX Directory", "10.1.X.X", "ou=XX group, ou=ipusers, 
ou=XXX", "389", "cn=XXX, ou=users, ou=XXX", "XXX", "");

This is the IIS error,

2009-06-10 00:04:35 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp 
action=search&id=-1 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 200 0 0
2009-06-10 00:04:41 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp 
action=list&id=-1&f=s|180|800a0031|Invalid_credentials 80 - 172.16.1.70 
Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 500 0 0


Can anyone shed some light on the reason I am getting invalid credentials, I 
have even gone as far as using the domain admin account and I get the same



Leslie

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

2009-06-09 Thread Aamir Panjwani 
As per latest newsletter all 13 labs will be released on 30th June.
Which is great, however, my understanding was that labs will be released
one by one as they are being developed. It would be really helpful if
possible to release lab 6,7 etc. now so we don't have to wait for
another 3 weeks for full volume 1 to be published.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Larry
Hadrava
Sent: Wednesday, 10 June 2009 9:34 AM
To: Nara Shikamaru
Cc: OSL Group; Phillip Smith
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

 

I'm checking on this for you.


Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com



On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru 
wrote:

Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?
I was under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released
in time for the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?

-- 
-Shikamaru



__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

2009-06-09 Thread Larry Hadrava 
I'm checking on this for you.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nara Shikamaru wrote:

> Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?  I
> was under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released in
> time for the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC Presence statuses...

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
OK, so we basically have three statuses...

Available, green with a checkbox

Idle, Yellow with a minus sign...

and DND which is red with a slash

How do we show that someone is on the phone? It appears to only work
when I make the call using the softphone... (CUPC), but if I set CUPC
to use the deskphone and make the call either thru the desk phone or
thru CUPC, I do not show as on the phone from other users...

Control of the phone from CUPC works fine... no probs at all...


Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch for CCIE Voice Home Lab

2009-06-09 Thread Jared Scrivener 
If my recollection serves the 2960 8 port switch is the same as the 2950 for
QoS and is entirely different from the 3750. I wouldn¹t suggest using it for
study purposes.


On 6/9/09 7:15 PM, "Russ Meuchel"  wrote:

> Does anyone know if the Cisco 2960 TT 8-port switch has the same QoS commands
> / syntax / capabilites as the 3750 switch (other than fact that there is no
> PoE and layer 3 routing protocols available)?  I'm thinking of purchasing this
> for a home lab if it makes sense to.  Thanks much.
> Russ
>  
> 

Cheers,

Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrive...@ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blocking CUPC clients from seeing presence of other CUPC clients...

2009-06-09 Thread Jonathan Charles 
How do you block CUPC users from seeing other CUPC users?

I have changed Presence Groups for user A and User B so they are
disallowed subscriptions... I have changed SUBSCRIBE CSS to not
include the partition of the other user... I even changed the LDAP
profiles in CUPS so they couldn't see the other OU... and they can
still see the presence status, still send/receive IMs...

Now, once I changed the LDAP search base on CUPS, you can no longer
search for the user and add em to your buddy list... but no presence
info is blocked...

How do you block this for CUPC?



Jonathan

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch for CCIE Voice Home Lab

2009-06-09 Thread Russ Meuchel 
Does anyone know if the Cisco 2960 TT 8-port switch has the same QoS
commands / syntax / capabilites as the 3750 switch (other than fact that
there is no PoE and layer 3 routing protocols available)?  I'm thinking of
purchasing this for a home lab if it makes sense to.  Thanks much.
Russ

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE v3 Lab Studying

2009-06-09 Thread Russ Meuchel 
Is there anyone else out there who is planning on taking the CCIE Voice v3
Lab exam in the Sept / Oct timeframe?  I am going to the IP Expert 2-week
bootcamp during the first 2 weeks of August in San Jose and taking the lab
this fall.  I'm interested in finding someone with a similar skill and
dedication level.  If anyone is interested in doing labs / studying remotely
together, please e-mail me at rmeuc...@gmail.com.
Thanks!
Russ Meuchel

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] unity vmware

2009-06-09 Thread ABIOLA ADEFILA 
Hello,

Does anyone know how i can get unity connection vmware to use for a lab
setup

THanks for the anticipated response

Cheers

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is it possible to bulk add Unity Subscribers?

2009-06-09 Thread Clawson, Von 
Creat a text file with the following headers
LAST_NAME,FIRST_NAME,ALIAS,DTMF_ACCESS_ID

The headers are case sensitive.
Then put in the subscriber information.  Save it as a txt and then in the bulk 
add find this file.

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of john D
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:21 PM
To: Azeem ahamed
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is it possible to bulk add Unity Subscribers?

Hello All,
Thanks for your replies. I am trying to do this & I am stuck at the place where 
it says "choose the CSV file"

Is there a sample CSV file which I can use to edit . There is lot of 
information about what headers needs to be in CSV. But not sure what is most 
relevant to us
Can you share what fields you are setting in your files?

Thanks,
John
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Azeem ahamed 
mailto:azeemo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Go to tools Depot>Administrative tools>Bulk Import

Here you can import users in bulk. you will have to create a csv file
with following fields

FIrst name, Last name, DTMF access Id (extension)

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:48 PM, 
ccieid1otmailto:ccieid...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> bulk import in Cisco Unity tools.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, john 
> Dmailto:jkd1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi
>> Is there a way to bulk add unity subscribers.
>>
>> Or is there a  way to make a copy of an existing subscriber ?
>>
>> -Thx
>> J
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 QoS Marking

2009-06-09 Thread Brad Godwin 
I have the following configuration on a 6500 (Sup1A, PFC, 6348 line card, 
7.6(1) code).  CCM version is 4.1(3) sr8.  I have configured CCM to send AF31 
instead of CS3.  I have verified that it is indeed sending AF31 with Wireshark. 
  The problem I am having is that the traffic coming from the CCM is being 
remarked to DSCP 0 in the 6500, again verified with Wireshark when I am looking 
at the trunk to the 3640.   The only way I am able to get the CCM traffic 
marked as AF31 is to change the default IP ACL.  Any ideas as to why I am not 
seeing CCM traffic marked with AF31

Here is a crude diagram.
CCM6500-3640
CCM is on port 4/11 in vlan 41
Phones are on 4/1-2
Trunk to router is on 4/10

#qos
set qos enable
set qos cos-dscp-map 0 8 16 26 34 46 48 56
clear qos acl all
#HQ_Trunk
set qos acl ip HQ_Trunk trust-dscp ip any  any
#IP_Phones
set qos acl ip IP_Phones trust-cos ip any  any
#CCM_Server
set qos acl ip CCM_Server dscp 26 tcp any  range 2000 2002 any
set qos acl ip CCM_Server dscp 26 tcp any  any  range 2000 2002
#
commit qos acl all
set qos acl map CCM_Server 41

set port qos 4/1-2 trust trust-cos
set qos acl map HQ_Trunk 4/10
set qos acl map IP_Phones 4/1-2
set qos acl map CCM_Server 4/11


Thanks,
Brad

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Is it possible to bulk add Unity Subscribers?

2009-06-09 Thread john D 
Hello All,
Thanks for your replies. I am trying to do this & I am stuck at the place
where it says "choose the CSV file"

Is there a sample CSV file which I can use to edit . There is lot of
information about what headers needs to be in CSV. But not sure what is most
relevant to us
Can you share what fields you are setting in your files?

Thanks,
John

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Azeem ahamed  wrote:

> Go to tools Depot>Administrative tools>Bulk Import
>
> Here you can import users in bulk. you will have to create a csv file
> with following fields
>
> FIrst name, Last name, DTMF access Id (extension)
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:48 PM, ccieid1ot wrote:
> > bulk import in Cisco Unity tools.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:41 PM, john D wrote:
> >> Hi
> >> Is there a way to bulk add unity subscribers.
> >>
> >> Or is there a  way to make a copy of an existing subscriber ?
> >>
> >> -Thx
> >> J
> >
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3: Module 6

2009-06-09 Thread Nara Shikamaru 
Does anyone know when module 6 for the new lab exam is being released?  I
was under the impression that the 13 modules were going to be released in
time for the July release of the lab?  Has this changed?

-- 
-Shikamaru

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Broadcast CUE-->UNITY

2009-06-09 Thread Art Sandborgh 

LOL!

I usually ignore her too - that's why it took so long for me to find this.

Glad to help,

Art


Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:35:33 +0300
From: Cristi Radescu 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Broadcast CUE-->UNITY
To: ccie list 
Message-ID:
<21c0dae06d627846bbfeebed4c4da65622595b9...@cre-exch.csc.crescendo.ro>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
 
Hi Art,
 
You was right. I found the message in "future broadcasts". I shall listen to 
that lady. I allways ignored her :)
After I am loging to Broadcast Administrator I am presssing "3" and the lady is 
telling me "the system has x future broadcast messages".
I tested this today in my personal lab. I will test it once again, tommorow, on 
ProctoLabs Rack.
Thank you so much. If I could rate you I will give 5 stars for this answer. 
This is the normal setup(HQ in PST and CME in GMT +8 timezone) but yestarday 
was the first time when I set timezones correctly:)
 
Many thanks once again,
Cristian
 
P.S: I will let you know about my tests on same Rack.
_
Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. 
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem

2009-06-09 Thread Saud Azar 



Hi,

Your right.  I will try that, did you look at my previous configuration? 

 

I will give that a try tonight.

 

Regards

 

Saud


 


Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:30:36 +0200
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem
From: ctpresid...@gmail.com
To: sauda...@hotmail.com
CC: sharde...@presidio.com; ccieid...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Hi Saud,

It sounds a little confusing. Let me know if I got this right?

You want to be able to dial an extension, but it might be one at a remote 
branch that's only connected via PSTN, so you have to translate that extension 
to full e164 number?

If the statement above is true, then it seems you only need to change the 
destination-pattern in your dial peer:

> > dial-peer voice 5900 pots
> > translation-profile outgoing outgoingcall
> > destination-pattern 0800...  <- This needs to be 0845...

Give that a try.


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Saud Azar  wrote:


 
I like to perform digit manipulation where if a user dials four digit extension 
it should automatically convert to a e.164 number 
 
for example if a user dials 4545 the number converts to a 5551123 

I used test voice translation profile rule 1 4545 and it shows that my config 
is fine. I know i am going wrong somewhere. 
 
I hope I made it clear of what I  am trying to achieve, sorry guys i am newbie 
to voice and testing in my home lab. 

Thanks



 
> From: sharde...@presidio.com
> To: ccieid...@gmail.com; sauda...@hotmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:31:40 -0400
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem



> 
> Please explain what result you are looking for and I think we can help..
> 
> 
> 
> Scott Hardesty | Solutions Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked 
> Solutions
> 7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | 
> mailto:sharde...@presidio.com
> D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> 
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:10 PM
> To: Saud Azar
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem
> 
> You are all over the place. What is 5900? Are you trying to
> translate ANI number 5900 to 0845444? What is this
> "translate-outgoing called 1"?
> 
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Saud Azar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I spent countless hours and i am hoping someone can help me.
> >
> > I have gone through documents, videos but it doesnt make sense.
> >
> > Basically i have a created a simple voice translation profile below is an
> > example
> >
> > voice translation-rule 1
> > rule 1 /^5900/ /0845444/
> >
> >
> > voice translation-profile outgoingcall
> > translate calling 1
> >
> > ephone-dn 1 dual-line
> > number 2300
> > translate calling 1
> >
> > i tested the rule and it works.
> >
> > Unfortunately when i dial from IP phone it says peer not found.
> >
> > I created the dial peer for 0845 pots
> >
> > dial-peer voice 5900 pots
> > translation-profile outgoing outgoingcall
> > destination-pattern 0800...
> > translate-outgoing called 1
> > port 0/2/1:15
> > forward-digits all
> >
> > I am not sure if i should create the dial peer for the extension or the
> > outgoing number.
> >
> > I would be greatful if someone can help me.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 Optimised for MSN. Download Now
> 



View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn more!

_
Get the best of MSN on your mobile
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/147991039/direct/01/

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Broadcast CUE-->UNITY

2009-06-09 Thread Cristi Radescu 
Hi Art,

You was right. I found the message in "future broadcasts". I shall listen to 
that lady. I allways ignored her :)
After I am loging to Broadcast Administrator I am presssing "3" and the lady is 
telling me "the system has x future broadcast messages".
I tested this today in my personal lab. I will test it once again, tommorow, on 
ProctoLabs Rack.
Thank you so much. If I could rate you I will give 5 stars for this answer. 
This is the normal setup(HQ in PST and CME in GMT +8 timezone) but yestarday 
was the first time when I set timezones correctly:)

Many thanks once again,
Cristian

P.S: I will let you know about my tests on same Rack.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Art Sandborgh
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 10:19 PM
To: ccie list
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Broadcast CUE-->UNITY


Christian,



I have seen this symptom before, but I do not know if you are experiencing the 
same cause.



I fought for hours trying to figure out why the messages did not arrive, when 
in reality they had

(but had not been distributed to the mailboxes yet). If your NTP for the 852 
site is set to an earlier timezone

( say +8) and you send the message to a later timezone (say -5) marked 
"immediate" it gets stored in the "future broadcasts".

The only way I know of to check is to dial into the Broadcast Administrator and 
check for pending messages (I think that is the

menu selection.  You should find it there if you are experiencing what I did.



Good Luck!



Art



Message: 5

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:57:27 +0300

From: Cristi Radescu 

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Broadcast CUE-->UNITY

To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 

Message-ID:

<21c0dae06d627846bbfeebed4c4da65622595b9...@cre-exch.csc.crescendo.ro>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"



Hi all,



Today I had a strange problem on a ProctorLabs rack.

I couldn't nail VPIM Broadcast from CUE to Unity. I did this many times before 
but today it didn't work.

Normal VPIM message is working perfect. Please see below related config on CUE:



network location id "104"

 email domain voip.lab

 name "UNITY-LAB"

 voicemail broadcast vpim-id 

 end location



network location id "852"

 email domain cciev.com

 name "cue"

 voicemail broadcast vpim-id 

 end location



network local location id 852



In Unity I had normal stuff for VPIM configured. Normal VPIM works in both 
directions. Broadcast VPIM from Unity to CUE works.

I have ping in unity-lab.voip.lab from CUE.



Debug from CUE looks ok:



961 06/08 15:16:52.293 netw vpim 3 VPIM: To: <1...@voip.lab>

8961 06/08 15:16:52.297 netw vpim 3 VPIM: From: cme<3...@cciev.com>

8961 06/08 15:16:52.303 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:16:51 +0100 
(BST)

8961 06/08 15:16:52.304 netw vpim 3 VPIM: MIME-Version: 1.0 (Voice 2.0)

8961 06/08 15:16:52.305 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-Type: 
Multipart/Voice-Message; Version=2.0;

8961 06/08 15:16:52.306 netw vpim 3 VPIM:   
Boundary="==VpimMsg==1244470612233"

8961 06/08 15:16:52.307 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

8961 06/08 15:16:52.308 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Message-ID: 


8961 06/08 15:16:52.311 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Subject: Broadcast Message from CUE 
Location 852

8961 06/08 15:16:52.311 netw vpim 3 VPIM: X-CISCO-SBM-ID: 
FHK0849F1CY-AIM-FOC11200C37-1244468200983-NBCM

8961 06/08 15:16:52.317 netw vpim 3 VPIM: X-CISCO-SBM-START-TIME: Mon, 08 Jun 
2009 15:16:51 +0100 (BST)

8961 06/08 15:16:52.324 netw vpim 3 VPIM: X-CISCO-SBM-END-TIME: Wed, 08 Jul 
2009 15:16:44 +0100 (BST)

8961 06/08 15:16:52.325 netw vpim 3 VPIM: X-CISCO-SBM-CUSTOM1: 
61EF9907D84E295ADB9E2F9951F79543

8961 06/08 15:16:52.326 netw vpim 3 VPIM:

8961 06/08 15:16:52.327 netw vpim 3 VPIM: --==VpimMsg==1244470612233

8961 06/08 15:16:52.328 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-Type: Audio/32KADPCM

8961 06/08 15:16:52.329 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64

8961 06/08 15:16:52.331 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-Description: VPIM Message

8961 06/08 15:16:52.331 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-Disposition: inline; 
voice=Voice-Message

8961 06/08 15:16:52.332 netw vpim 3 VPIM: Content-ID: 
FHK0849F1CY-AIM-FOC11200C37-1244468200983-NBCM

8961 06/08 15:16:52.333 netw vpim 3 VPIM:

...



Anyone faced it before? I changed "broadcast message verify interval" at 1 
minute, I waited 10 minutes probably but ... nothing.



Any idea would be highly appreciated,

Cristian



-- next part --

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090608/5ae57eab/attachment.htm



--



___

CCIE_Voice mailing list

CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice





End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 40, Issue 28

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem

2009-06-09 Thread ctpresident 
Hi Saud,

It sounds a little confusing. Let me know if I got this right?

You want to be able to dial an extension, but it might be one at a remote
branch that's only connected via PSTN, so you have to translate that
extension to full e164 number?

If the statement above is true, then it seems you only need to change the
destination-pattern in your dial peer:

> > dial-peer voice 5900 pots
> > translation-profile outgoing outgoingcall
> > destination-pattern 0800...  <- This needs to be 0845...

Give that a try.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Saud Azar  wrote:

>
> I like to perform digit manipulation where if a user dials four digit
> extension it should automatically convert to a e.164 number
>
> for example if a user dials 4545 the number converts to a 5551123
>
> I used test voice translation profile rule 1 4545 and it shows that my
> config is fine. I know i am going wrong somewhere.
>
> I hope I made it clear of what I  am trying to achieve, sorry guys i am
> newbie to voice and testing in my home lab.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> > From: sharde...@presidio.com
> > To: ccieid...@gmail.com; sauda...@hotmail.com
> > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:31:40 -0400
> > Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem
>
> >
> > Please explain what result you are looking for and I think we can help..
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott Hardesty | Solutions Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked
> Solutions
> > 7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | mailto:
> sharde...@presidio.com
> > D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
> > Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:10 PM
> > To: Saud Azar
> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem
> >
> > You are all over the place. What is 5900? Are you trying to
> > translate ANI number 5900 to 0845444? What is this
> > "translate-outgoing called 1"?
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Saud Azar wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I spent countless hours and i am hoping someone can help me.
> > >
> > > I have gone through documents, videos but it doesnt make sense.
> > >
> > > Basically i have a created a simple voice translation profile below is
> an
> > > example
> > >
> > > voice translation-rule 1
> > > rule 1 /^5900/ /0845444/
> > >
> > >
> > > voice translation-profile outgoingcall
> > > translate calling 1
> > >
> > > ephone-dn 1 dual-line
> > > number 2300
> > > translate calling 1
> > >
> > > i tested the rule and it works.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately when i dial from IP phone it says peer not found.
> > >
> > > I created the dial peer for 0845 pots
> > >
> > > dial-peer voice 5900 pots
> > > translation-profile outgoing outgoingcall
> > > destination-pattern 0800...
> > > translate-outgoing called 1
> > > port 0/2/1:15
> > > forward-digits all
> > >
> > > I am not sure if i should create the dial peer for the extension or the
> > > outgoing number.
> > >
> > > I would be greatful if someone can help me.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> > > Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 Optimised for MSN. Download Now
> >
>
> --
> View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place - Learn 
> more!
>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem

2009-06-09 Thread Saud Azar 

 

I like to perform digit manipulation where if a user dials four digit extension 
it should automatically convert to a e.164 number 

 

for example if a user dials 4545 the number converts to a 5551123 


I used test voice translation profile rule 1 4545 and it shows that my config 
is fine. I know i am going wrong somewhere. 

 

I hope I made it clear of what I  am trying to achieve, sorry guys i am newbie 
to voice and testing in my home lab. 


Thanks




 
> From: sharde...@presidio.com
> To: ccieid...@gmail.com; sauda...@hotmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:31:40 -0400
> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem
> 
> Please explain what result you are looking for and I think we can help..
> 
> 
> 
> Scott Hardesty | Solutions Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked 
> Solutions
> 7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD 20770 | 
> mailto:sharde...@presidio.com
> D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | http://www.presidio.com/
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> 
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccieid1ot
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:10 PM
> To: Saud Azar
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Translation Problem
> 
> You are all over the place. What is 5900? Are you trying to
> translate ANI number 5900 to 0845444? What is this
> "translate-outgoing called 1"?
> 
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Saud Azar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I spent countless hours and i am hoping someone can help me.
> >
> > I have gone through documents, videos but it doesnt make sense.
> >
> > Basically i have a created a simple voice translation profile below is an
> > example
> >
> > voice translation-rule 1
> > rule 1 /^5900/ /0845444/
> >
> >
> > voice translation-profile outgoingcall
> > translate calling 1
> >
> > ephone-dn 1 dual-line
> > number 2300
> > translate calling 1
> >
> > i tested the rule and it works.
> >
> > Unfortunately when i dial from IP phone it says peer not found.
> >
> > I created the dial peer for 0845 pots
> >
> > dial-peer voice 5900 pots
> > translation-profile outgoing outgoingcall
> > destination-pattern 0800...
> > translate-outgoing called 1
> > port 0/2/1:15
> > forward-digits all
> >
> > I am not sure if i should create the dial peer for the extension or the
> > outgoing number.
> >
> > I would be greatful if someone can help me.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > 
> > Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 Optimised for MSN. Download Now
> 

_

MSN straight to your mobile - news, entertainment, videos and more.

http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/147991039/direct/01/