Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3
Hi Tamer, It works You are the man ,Thanks alot. :) Amr Sherif Senior Network Voice Engineer From: tih...@gmail.com To: miroale...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:49:48 +0300 Hi Amr, I read the question over and over… It seems that 1st time I didn’t understand the question very well. So, now 1-Is that mean that 1003 is an extension that has a separate Mailbox on UC OR it's just a normal extension but that the call be forwarded to? 1003 extension has Mailbox on UC 2-Should MWI be directed to that extension and appears as an envelope on that 2nd button or just MWI go to the br1ph2 which is extension 1002? Should be directed to 1003, which will reflect br1ph2 3-About the 1st solution you introduced, should i add the 1000 as a secondary line on ephone-dn or as a secondary line on UC br1ph2 user? Ignore that. Your configuration seems to be right. But remove this command: call-forward b2bua mailbox 1002 Best regards, Tamer Ismail From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amr Sherif Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 10:44 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3 Hi Tamer, Actually no luck, Basicly I got confused little bit as the question is mentioning Call should go directly to extension 1003's voicemail.Extension 1003 should forward all to voicemail and be placed on BR1Ph2 as a 2nd line appearance . NOW: 1-Is that mean that 1003 is an extension that has a separate Mailbox on UC OR it's just a normal extension but that the call be forwarded to? 2-Should MWI be directed to that extension and appears as an envelop on that 2nd button or just MWI go to the br1ph2 which is extension 1002? 3-About the 1st solution you introduced,should i add the 1000 as a secondry line on ephone-dn or as a secondary line on UC br1ph2 user? After reading the quesiton many times now getting more confused lol :) I will be appreciated if you help me in those questions Thanks Amr Sherif Senior Network Voice Engineer From: tih...@gmail.com To: miroale...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:39:21 +0300 Hi Amr, You have to add final 1600 (instead of 1003) in voice hunt-group. Then you have 2 options: 1st : Add secondary number (1000) for 1003 voice mail. 2nd : Configure translate redirect from 1000 to 1003 Check and feed me back. Best regards, Tamer Ismail CONNECT Professional Services Website: www.connectps.com From: Amr Sherif [mailto:miroale...@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:27 PM To: tih...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3 Hi Tamer, Well Br1Ph2 has a secondary line which is 1003 ,so what you are saying is that make a voice tranlation rute to translate from 1000 to 1003 and add it to the voice register dn 3 ,is that right? The problem is that the call flow will be from PSTN for instance (6178632638) --- dial 6178631000 - both BR1 phones will ring Call will be forwarded to the dn 1003 which should be forward all to UC then hear the opening greeting instead the subscriber one although ext 1000 is added as alternative extension with br1ph2 So Please Advise. Amr Sherif Senior Network Voice Engineer From: tih...@gmail.com To: miroale...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:45:22 +0300 Hi Amr, Because you calling UC with ANI 1000, and you should dial with ANI 1003 to deliver to 1003’s mail box. You have to translate ANI from 1000 to 1003 while you go to UC. Or put secondary line to BR1 Ph2 Best regards, Tamer Ismail CONNECT Professional Services Website: www.connectps.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amr Sherif Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 9:06 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 9 Vol 2 Q 7.3 Hello Experts, BR1 CME is integrated with UC using SIP the question is When calls come into number 1000 it should broadcast to phone 1 2 for 12 seconds,Upon no answer call should go directly to extensionn 1003's voicemail.Now extension 1003 should forward all to voicemail and be placed on BR1 Ph 2 as a 2nd line appearance. The issue is that when dialing from PSTN to 6178631000 ,both phones are ringing and after that th call is forwarded to unity connection which answer but not with the subscriber message of BR1 Ph2 it just say the normal greeting as if there is no user. My configuration is as fllow: voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE- Meida resources load-balancing (Miron Kobelski)
Maybe de words load-balancing is confusing, and maybe all your config is fine, but you wait another result. If you want see the load-balancing function you will need put two calls in Hold in se same time, and the result must be one call in each MOH server. Greetings -- From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meida resources load-balancing Hi, AFAIK, when two resources of the same type (e.g. MoH servers) are in the same MRG, they should be load balanced. This is sometimes requested in various mock labs. I was never able to achieve this. My config: * MRG with both MoH servers * MRGL with MRG * IP phones associated with the MRGL via DP It should do load-balancing, but instead I get following output in CLI (MoH server on publisher is being invoked every time): admin:show perf query class Cisco MOH Device ==query class : - Perf class (Cisco MOH Device) has instances and values: MOH_2 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 0 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_2 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_2 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_2 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 0 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 250 MOH_3 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_3 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_3 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_3 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 250 admin:show perf query class Cisco MOH Device ==query class : - Perf class (Cisco MOH Device) has instances and values: MOH_2 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 1 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_2 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_2 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_2 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 1 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 249 MOH_3 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_3 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_3 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_3 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 250 admin:show perf query class Cisco MOH Device ==query class : - Perf class (Cisco MOH Device) has instances and values: MOH_2 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 1 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_2 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_2 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_2 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 0 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 250 MOH_3 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_3 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_3 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_3 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 250 admin:show perf query class Cisco MOH Device ==query class : - Perf class (Cisco MOH Device) has instances and values: MOH_2 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 1 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_2 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_2 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_2 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_2 - MOHTotalUnicastResources = 250 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceActive = 1 MOH_2 - MOHUnicastResourceAvailable= 249 MOH_3 - MOHHighestActiveResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceActive = 0 MOH_3 - MOHMulticastResourceAvailable = 25 MOH_3 - MOHOutOfResources = 0 MOH_3 - MOHTotalMulticastResources = 25 MOH_3 - MOHTotalUnicastResources
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unable to add GW/GK in CUCM...
Thanks Randall. i was using same loopback ip for GW and GK. Now i need to add sip trunk to this RTR acting as sip registrar server. again another interface!. Is it must to use saperate interfaces or any alternate work around to use same interface for different technologies?(SIP/H323) One more thing to be clear! is it neccessary to register GW first in order to register IOS based Enhanced Conference bridge in UCM or we can register IOS media resources without register the GW? Regards, Mudassar CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From: rrcr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unable to add GW/GK in CUCM... Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:55:07 -0800 To: mudas...@hotmail.com Check what ip addresses you have your gateways registering with. The hq h323 gw should be the voice default gw ip and the Gk should be the loop ack Hth Randall Sent from my iPhone On Dec 19, 2010, at 4:16 PM, mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi experts, added and deleted HQ-RTR multiple times, now it comes a strange situation. If i add HQ-RTR as H323 GW, its added successfully but adding this HQ-RTR as GK gives following error in CUCM: Add failed. One of the required fields on the page has the same value as an entry that already exists in the database. Please check the corresponding Find List page to verify your entry does not exist. Same is the case in the opposite direction. deleted both GW and GK, added HQ-RTR as GK, its added successfully but when try to add it as a H323 GW, gives the same error. Anybody ran into the same situation before? Regards, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unable to add GW/GK in CUCM...
I don't think you need to register the gw before a hq conference. I do the config in the iOS then cucm Try you sip trunk to the voice interface Hth Randall Sent from my iPhone On Dec 20, 2010, at 2:53 PM, mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks Randall. i was using same loopback ip for GW and GK. Now i need to add sip trunk to this RTR acting as sip registrar server. again another interface!. Is it must to use saperate interfaces or any alternate work around to use same interface for different technologies?(SIP/H323) One more thing to be clear! is it neccessary to register GW first in order to register IOS based Enhanced Conference bridge in UCM or we can register IOS media resources without register the GW? Regards, Mudassar CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From: rrcr...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] unable to add GW/GK in CUCM... Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:55:07 -0800 To: mudas...@hotmail.com Check what ip addresses you have your gateways registering with. The hq h323 gw should be the voice default gw ip and the Gk should be the loop ack Hth Randall Sent from my iPhone On Dec 19, 2010, at 4:16 PM, mudassar Khalid mudas...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi experts, added and deleted HQ-RTR multiple times, now it comes a strange situation. If i add HQ-RTR as H323 GW, its added successfully but adding this HQ-RTR as GK gives following error in CUCM: Add failed. One of the required fields on the page has the same value as an entry that already exists in the database. Please check the corresponding Find List page to verify your entry does not exist. Same is the case in the opposite direction. deleted both GW and GK, added HQ-RTR as GK, its added successfully but when try to add it as a H323 GW, gives the same error. Anybody ran into the same situation before? Regards, Mudassar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 5 Task 2.3
I have concluded the preceding 0 that comes in from the PSTN was incorrect in the WB and PG? These are the tasks where it talks about having +44 020 5943 2785 in the missed/received calls directory. First, I was not getting the 0 or National in my debug isdn q931 on inbound calls from the 2nd Button on PSTN Phone to HQ Phone 2. I changed the translation pattern on the PSTN router FROM rule 2 /^2059432785$/ /\0/ type any subscriber plan any isdn TO rule 2 /^2059432785$/ /0\0/ type any national plan any isdn However, if i strip the 0 (National Number - 44:1) at the HQ Gateway and Globalize the Number, then how is going to show in the missed/received calls directory as +44 020 5943 2785? Any insight to this is greatly appreciated! Brian ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 5 Task 2.3
Hi Brian, I would change back their pattern as they are testing you on the following concepts. When the call comes into the GW on CUCM, the prefix values configured will be added to the front of the number. In order to figure out how you will prefix this you need to look at the debug isdn q931 and work with what you've got. Meaning, if you are receiving a Subscriber number 2059432785 then you need to manipulate the Subscriber prefix. This will effect what you will see in the Missed Calls and solve part 2. Now, the phone's device pool has a calling party transformation calling search space applied to it. This will be used incoming on the phone and determine how you will localize the calls on the screen. You will need to have a Calling Party Xformation pattern that will manipulate it back down. This effects the screen and nothing else. I'm trying not to give the answer as understanding these concepts is key and you can solve this in 2 mins once you understand how these all work together. Try and fool around with these values and let us know how it goes. Hope this helps, Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Rudy Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 8:04 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 5 Task 2.3 I have concluded the preceding 0 that comes in from the PSTN was incorrect in the WB and PG? These are the tasks where it talks about having +44 020 5943 2785 in the missed/received calls directory. First, I was not getting the 0 or National in my debug isdn q931 on inbound calls from the 2nd Button on PSTN Phone to HQ Phone 2. I changed the translation pattern on the PSTN router FROM rule 2 /^2059432785$/ /\0/ type any subscriber plan any isdn TO rule 2 /^2059432785$/ /0\0/ type any national plan any isdn However, if i strip the 0 (National Number - 44:1) at the HQ Gateway and Globalize the Number, then how is going to show in the missed/received calls directory as +44 020 5943 2785? Any insight to this is greatly appreciated! Brian ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
