Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN qos question

[Michael Miller]

"1.) I thought IOS would refuse attaching a class to a dlci without frts on
the physical interface."

In my experience, it is possible to enable FRTS on a PVC, but you may
receive a warning message. If I remember correctly, the message simply
states that FRTS commands are required on the physical interface. I
wouldn't be surprised if the behavior differs between versions of IOS
and MQC vs. legacy FTS, though.

Thanks,

Michael

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:14 PM,  wrote:

> I ran into a problem the other day that has me confused.
> I ran auto qos on the hq side, changed values as needed and pasted the
> modified policy in the hq router.
> I then took the same policy and pasted it into the SB router config and
> bound it to the dlci.
> All seemed to be ok until I tried to get phones registered.
> I could get a dhcp address but never register.
>
> I knew something with the WAN qos was screwed up.
> I've done it to myself in practice and in the real lab.
>
> It turns out that I didn't have frts on the physical interface.
> Once I put it on, everything started working.
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1.) I thought IOS would refuse attaching a class to a dlci without frts on
> the physical interface.
> 2.) Without frts configured on the physical interface, wouldn't the class
> assignment on the dlci (384k) effectively be ignored?
>
> I know what the config problem was, but I understand what it was actually
> causing to happen at the Pvc level.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gateway failed to register to GK

[Yankee Lo]

Did you enter gateway after you configured h323-gateway?
Try remove h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 200.200.110.2 from lo0, configure 
this on the voice interface.


From: Guoming Zhang 
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"  
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 12:01 AM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gateway failed to register to GK


Hi,

Need to help to figure it out why my gateway would not register to GK.

--GK configure--
HQ#show run | b gatek
gatekeeper
 zone local Z_ZONE ccie.cisco.com 200.200.110.3
 alias static 200.200.210.239 1720 gkid Z_ZONE gateway voip ras 200.200.210.239 
55616 e164 5001 e164 5002 e164 1001 e164 1002
 alias static 200.200.110.2 1720 gkid Z_ZONE gateway voip ras 200.200.110.2 
62766 e164 3006 e164 3002
 no shutdown
...

--- Gateway configure --

BR2-CME#show run in loopback 0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 234 bytes
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 200.200.110.2 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id Z_ZONE ipaddr 200.200.110.3 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-CME
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 200.200.110.2
end

voice service voip 
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 fax protocol cisco 
 h323
  no call service stop
  call preserve 
 sip
  bind control source-interface Loopback0
  bind media source-interface Loopback0
  registrar server expires max 3600 min 300
!
!

=== debug message  from gateway ==
BR2-CME#show debug

H.225:
  H.225 ASN1 Messages debugging is on

BR2-CME#
Dec  5 07:45:42.122: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=

value RasMessage ::= gatekeeperRequest : 
    {
  requestSeqNum 52
  protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
  rasAddress ipAddress : 
  {
    ip 'C8C86E02'H
    port 60717
  }
  endpointType 
  {
    vendor 
    {
  vendor 
  {
    t35CountryCode 181
    t35Extension 0
    manufacturerCode 18
  }
  productId '436973636F47617465776179'H
  versionId '32'H
    }
    gateway 
    {
  protocol 
  {
    voice : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    },    h323 : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    }
  }
    }
    mc FALSE
    undefinedNode FALSE
  }
  gatekeeperIdentifier {"Z_ZONE"}
  endpointAlias 
  {
  
BR2-CME#  dialedDigits : "3000",
    dialedDigits : "3004",
    dialedDigits : "6688",
    dialedDigits : "8000",
    dialedDigits : "",
    dialedDigits : "1112",
    dialedDigits : "7001",
    dialedDigits : "",
    dialedDigits : "4445",
    dialedDigits : "3020",
    dialedDigits : "711",
    h323-ID : {"BR2-CME"}
  }
    }



Dec  5 07:45:42.126: RAS OUTGOING ENCODE BUFFER::= 
00A00033060008914A000400C8C86E02ED2D28C0B5120B436973636F47617465776179003240023C0501002C0501000280005A005F005A004F004E00450C0180633301806337018099BB0180B3330180018044450180A334018001807778018063530100A44406004200520032002D0043004D0045
Dec  5 07:45:42.126: 
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS INCOMING ENCODE BUFFER::= 
04800033060008914A00040A005A005F005A004F004E004500C8C86E0306B7
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: 
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS INCOMING PDU ::=

value RasMessage ::= gatekeeperConfirm : 
    {
  requestSeqNum 52
  protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
  gatekeeperIdentifier {"Z_ZONE"}
  rasAddress ipAddress : 
  {
    ip 'C8C86E03'H
    port 1719
  }
    }



Dec  5 07:45:42.138: H225 NONSTD OUTGOING PDU ::=

value RasnonStdUsageTypes ::= 
    {
  callModes NULL
    }



Dec  5 07:45:42.138: H225 NONSTD OUTGOING ENCODE BUFFER::= 40
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: 
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=

value RasMessage ::= registrationRequest : 
    {
  requestSeqNum 53
  protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
  discoveryComplete TRUE
  callSignalAddress 
  {
    ipAddress : 
    {
  ip 'C8C86E02'H
  port 1720
    }
  }
  rasAddress 
  {
    ipAddress : 
    {
  ip 'C8C86E02'H
  port 60717
    }
  }
  terminalType 
  {
    vendor 
    {
  vendor 
  {
    t35CountryCode 181
    t35Extension 0
    manufacturerCode 18
  }
  productId '436973636F47617465776179'H
  versionId '32'H
    }
    gateway 
    {
  protocol 
  {
    voice : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    },    h323 : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    }
  }
    }
    mc FALSE
    undefinedNode FALSE
  }
  terminalAlias 
  {
    dialedDigits : "3000",
    dialedDigit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

[Mohd Baqari]

In HWIC trust is the default state. Also. srr can be configured.

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> Hello,
>  
> We can configur the L2 QoS on 3750 switch using SRR, Port based Trusts and 
> etc.
>  
> But what about the 4 port HWIC module? What kind of QoS must be done for that?
>  
> I have tryed but the HWIC ports does not undertand the mls qos command.
>  
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME Af31

[Mohd Baqari]

I won't do unless a question comes in the exam related to this.

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 5, 2011, at 6:24 PM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> Hello,
>  
> Do we need to configure the DSCP Mutation maps for CUCME site, as the CUCME 
> IP Phones are marking the signaling traffic with AF31. Well actually in my 
> LAB installation I am using IOS version 12.4(22)T and my IP Phones are 
> already sending SCCP with CS3.
> And what about the real exam?
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Log Problem

[Edgar Feliz]

Are you looking at the Sub CUCM or whatever  you primary call processing
agent is. IF you are in the wrong CUCM you will not see any call
information.

E

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, datucha123 datucha123  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with CUCM  - when trying to view Logs in real time either
> through RTMT or "file tail" command in CLI, the logs starts only for
> several lines, and then stops logging, there are no new information (Loggin
> messages) coming up any more.
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN qos question

[Mohd Baqari]

In frts isn't enabled on physical interface command will be taken on pvc but 
not effective.

Regards,
Mohammed Al Baqari

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:14 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote:

> I ran into a problem the other day that has me confused.
> I ran auto qos on the hq side, changed values as needed and pasted the 
> modified policy in the hq router.
> I then took the same policy and pasted it into the SB router config and bound 
> it to the dlci.
> All seemed to be ok until I tried to get phones registered.
> I could get a dhcp address but never register.
> 
> I knew something with the WAN qos was screwed up.
> I've done it to myself in practice and in the real lab.
> 
> It turns out that I didn't have frts on the physical interface.
> Once I put it on, everything started working.
> 
> My questions are:
> 
> 1.) I thought IOS would refuse attaching a class to a dlci without frts on 
> the physical interface.
> 2.) Without frts configured on the physical interface, wouldn't the class 
> assignment on the dlci (384k) effectively be ignored?
> 
> I know what the config problem was, but I understand what it was actually 
> causing to happen at the Pvc level.
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings

[datucha123 datucha123]

Also please pay attention, that we can use the DHCP Classes to achive the
mentioned solution, but in that case, each phone must be of different
model, as each Model IP Phones has the same of Hex values.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> I really appreciate that hint man. That webpage you sent me is awesome. I
> looked somewhere but I didn't see it. I looked for manual binding, but I
> could only see it by creating many pools with the client-identifier command.
>
>
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Matthew Saskin  wrote:
>
>> Look up using an external file (either via TFTP or on the router flash)
>> for the easiest (in my opinion) way to accomplish manual DHCP address
>> binding within a single pool.  In fact, I'm fairly certain that a number of
>> us responded with various was to accomplish this in an earlier email thread.
>>
>> -matthew
>>
>>  On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Emanuel Damasceno > > wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello experts,
>>>
>>> We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who
>>> mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention.
>>>
>>> My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those
>>> documents, I really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using
>>> more than 1 pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or
>>> 3, or whatever, they just wanna scare us.
>>>
>>> If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this
>>> e-mail. I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA.
>>>
>>> I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool.
>>>
>>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings

[datucha123 datucha123]

You can find more info about Manual binding using File in IOS configuration
guides:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipaddr/configuration/guide/12_4/iad_12_4_book.html
*Part3: DHCP
*
Hope that helps.


On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> I really appreciate that hint man. That webpage you sent me is awesome. I
> looked somewhere but I didn't see it. I looked for manual binding, but I
> could only see it by creating many pools with the client-identifier command.
>
>
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Matthew Saskin  wrote:
>
>> Look up using an external file (either via TFTP or on the router flash)
>> for the easiest (in my opinion) way to accomplish manual DHCP address
>> binding within a single pool.  In fact, I'm fairly certain that a number of
>> us responded with various was to accomplish this in an earlier email thread.
>>
>> -matthew
>>
>>  On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Emanuel Damasceno > > wrote:
>>
>>>  Hello experts,
>>>
>>> We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who
>>> mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention.
>>>
>>> My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those
>>> documents, I really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using
>>> more than 1 pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or
>>> 3, or whatever, they just wanna scare us.
>>>
>>> If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this
>>> e-mail. I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA.
>>>
>>> I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool.
>>>
>>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Integration

[Edgar Feliz]

Yes on the lab workbook it tells you if you need to change license and were to 
go get them. Always check your license first even In real lab you may need to 
change license depending on the lab you get and what someone before you had may 
require different license



On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:08 AM, Priyank Kiran  wrote:

> What drives as to how the CUE will integrate with CME or UCM - the type of 
> license installed on the CUE?
>  
> I was working on the ProctorLabs rack over the weekend and the task was to 
> integrate CUE with BR2 CME. However when I ran the initialization wizard on 
> the CUE GUI, it started asking me about Call Manager info and JTAPI web 
> login/password.
>  
> Can someone confirm this, I was very late into the rental rack hour and 
> forgot to check the type of license installed?
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM Log Problem

[datucha123 datucha123]

Hello,

I have a problem with CUCM  - when trying to view Logs in real time either
through RTMT or "file tail" command in CLI, the logs starts only for
several lines, and then stops logging, there are no new information (Loggin
messages) coming up any more.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings

[Emanuel Damasceno]

I really appreciate that hint man. That webpage you sent me is awesome. I
looked somewhere but I didn't see it. I looked for manual binding, but I
could only see it by creating many pools with the client-identifier command.


*Emanuel Damasceno*




On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Matthew Saskin  wrote:

> Look up using an external file (either via TFTP or on the router flash)
> for the easiest (in my opinion) way to accomplish manual DHCP address
> binding within a single pool.  In fact, I'm fairly certain that a number of
> us responded with various was to accomplish this in an earlier email thread.
>
> -matthew
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Emanuel Damasceno 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello experts,
>>
>> We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who
>> mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention.
>>
>> My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those documents,
>> I really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using more than 1
>> pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or 3, or
>> whatever, they just wanna scare us.
>>
>> If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this
>> e-mail. I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA.
>>
>> I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool.
>>
>> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings

[Matthew Saskin]

Look up using an external file (either via TFTP or on the router flash) for
the easiest (in my opinion) way to accomplish manual DHCP address binding
within a single pool.  In fact, I'm fairly certain that a number of us
responded with various was to accomplish this in an earlier email thread.

-matthew

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> Hello experts,
>
> We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who
> mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention.
>
> My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those documents,
> I really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using more than 1
> pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or 3, or
> whatever, they just wanna scare us.
>
> If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this
> e-mail. I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA.
>
> I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool.
>
> *Emanuel Damasceno*
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS Version

[Gurpreet Singh Kukreja]

Hey Robert,

Sorry about that. Here's the correct link
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292

We do know its 12.4T but i'm not certain on the exact one. If you're using
12.4T train, then you should be ok.

Regards
Gurpreet


On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Robert Schuknecht wrote:

> Hi Gurpreet,
>
> ** **
>
> this List is for the old Version 2 of the LAB. I did my preparation with
> 12.4(20)T or 12.4(22)T something. Unfortunately I do not find the actual
> List, at the Moment. There is officially stated that they use 12.4T and not
> 12.4 MainLine.
>
> ** **
>
> /Robert
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *Gurpreet Singh
> Kukreja
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 5. Dezember 2011 07:27
> *An:* datucha123 datucha123
> *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS Version
>
> ** **
>
> All routers use IOS version 12.4 Main Train
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/voice/lab_equipment.html
>
>
> - Gurpreet
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:00 PM, datucha123 datucha123 <
> datucha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What is the exact IOS version on the Exam?
>
> I am using 12.4.(22) T version in my LAB.
>
> Is it OK?
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> ** **
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN qos question

[CCIELabRat]

I ran into a problem the other day that has me confused.
I ran auto qos on the hq side, changed values as needed and pasted the
modified policy in the hq router.
I then took the same policy and pasted it into the SB router config and
bound it to the dlci.
All seemed to be ok until I tried to get phones registered.
I could get a dhcp address but never register.

I knew something with the WAN qos was screwed up.
I've done it to myself in practice and in the real lab.

It turns out that I didn't have frts on the physical interface.
Once I put it on, everything started working.

My questions are:

1.) I thought IOS would refuse attaching a class to a dlci without frts on
the physical interface.
2.) Without frts configured on the physical interface, wouldn't the class
assignment on the dlci (384k) effectively be ignored?

I know what the config problem was, but I understand what it was actually
causing to happen at the Pvc level.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings

[Emanuel Damasceno]

Thanks Matthew!!
*Emanuel Damasceno*




On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Mathew Miller wrote:

>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipaddr/configuration/guide/iad_dhcp_svr_cfg_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1114385
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Emanuel Damasceno 
> wrote:
> > Hello experts,
> >
> > We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who
> > mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention.
> >
> > My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those
> documents, I
> > really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using more than 1
> > pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or 3, or
> > whatever, they just wanna scare us.
> >
> > If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this
> e-mail.
> > I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA.
> >
> > I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool.
> >
> > Emanuel Damasceno
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> > www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME Af31

[datucha123 datucha123]

Hello,

Do we need to configure the DSCP Mutation maps for CUCME site, as the CUCME
IP Phones are marking the signaling traffic with AF31. Well actually in my
LAB installation I am using IOS version 12.4(22)T and my IP Phones are
already sending SCCP with CS3.
And what about the real exam?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Integration

[Priyank Kiran]

What drives as to how the CUE will integrate with CME or UCM - the type of
license installed on the CUE?

I was working on the ProctorLabs rack over the weekend and the task was to
integrate CUE with BR2 CME. However when I ran the initialization wizard on
the CUE GUI, it started asking me about Call Manager info and JTAPI web
login/password.

Can someone confirm this, I was very late into the rental rack hour and
forgot to check the type of license installed?

Thanks!
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP bindings

[Emanuel Damasceno]

Hello experts,

We can't just ignore all the messages we see here. And the last guy who
mentioned about DHCP manual bind, that really drew my attention.

My knowledge goes as far as the documents I read. In all those documents, I
really didn't see a way to make a manual bind without using more than 1
pool. I think those guys come and say they saw lab 1, or 2, or 3, or
whatever, they just wanna scare us.

If somebody really thinks this is authentic, please respond to this e-mail.
I am NOT talking about Lab X, nor I wanna screw with Cisco's NDA.

I wanna know about this DHCP manual binding with one pool.

*Emanuel Damasceno*
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

[datucha123 datucha123]

Hello,

We can configur the L2 QoS on 3750 switch using SRR, Port based Trusts and
etc.

But what about the 4 port HWIC module? What kind of QoS must be done for
that?

I have tryed but the HWIC ports does not undertand the mls qos command.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS Version

[Robert Schuknecht]

Hi Gurpreet,

 

this List is for the old Version 2 of the LAB. I did my preparation with
12.4(20)T or 12.4(22)T something. Unfortunately I do not find the actual
List, at the Moment. There is officially stated that they use 12.4T and not
12.4 MainLine.

 

/Robert

 

Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Im Auftrag von Gurpreet
Singh Kukreja
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Dezember 2011 07:27
An: datucha123 datucha123
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Betreff: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IOS Version

 

All routers use IOS version 12.4 Main Train

http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/voice/lab_equipment.html


- Gurpreet

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:00 PM, datucha123 datucha123 
wrote:

What is the exact IOS version on the Exam?

I am using 12.4.(22) T version in my LAB. 

Is it OK?

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gateway failed to register to GK

[datucha123 datucha123]

what does the "debug gatekeeper main 5 | 10" and "degub ras" output shows?
Please put them as well.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Guoming Zhang wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> Need to help to figure it out why my gateway would not register to GK.
>
> --GK configure--
> HQ#show run | b gatek
> gatekeeper
>  zone local Z_ZONE ccie.cisco.com 200.200.110.3
>  alias static 200.200.210.239 1720 gkid Z_ZONE gateway voip ras
> 200.200.210.239 55616 e164 5001 e164 5002 e164 1001 e164 1002
>  alias static 200.200.110.2 1720 gkid Z_ZONE gateway voip ras
> 200.200.110.2 62766 e164 3006 e164 3002
>  no shutdown
> ...
>
> --- Gateway configure --
>
> BR2-CME#show run in loopback 0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 234 bytes
> !
> interface Loopback0
>  ip address 200.200.110.2 255.255.255.255
>  h323-gateway voip interface
>  h323-gateway voip id Z_ZONE ipaddr 200.200.110.3 1719
>  h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-CME
>  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 200.200.110.2
> end
>
> voice service voip
>  allow-connections h323 to h323
>  allow-connections h323 to sip
>  allow-connections sip to h323
>  allow-connections sip to sip
>  fax protocol cisco
>  h323
>   no call service stop
>   call preserve
>  sip
>   bind control source-interface Loopback0
>   bind media source-interface Loopback0
>   registrar server expires max 3600 min 300
> !
> !
>
> === debug message  from gateway ==
> BR2-CME#show debug
>
> H.225:
>   H.225 ASN1 Messages debugging is on
>
> BR2-CME#
> Dec  5 07:45:42.122: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=
>
> value RasMessage ::= gatekeeperRequest :
> {
>   requestSeqNum 52
>   protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
>   rasAddress ipAddress :
>   {
> ip 'C8C86E02'H
> port 60717
>   }
>   endpointType
>   {
> vendor
> {
>   vendor
>   {
> t35CountryCode 181
> t35Extension 0
> manufacturerCode 18
>   }
>   productId '436973636F47617465776179'H
>   versionId '32'H
> }
> gateway
> {
>   protocol
>   {
> voice :
> {
>   supportedPrefixes
>   {
>   }
> },h323 :
> {
>   supportedPrefixes
>   {
>   }
> }
>   }
> }
> mc FALSE
> undefinedNode FALSE
>   }
>   gatekeeperIdentifier {"Z_ZONE"}
>   endpointAlias
>   {
>
> BR2-CME#  dialedDigits : "3000",
> dialedDigits : "3004",
> dialedDigits : "6688",
> dialedDigits : "8000",
> dialedDigits : "",
> dialedDigits : "1112",
> dialedDigits : "7001",
> dialedDigits : "",
> dialedDigits : "4445",
> dialedDigits : "3020",
> dialedDigits : "711",
> h323-ID : {"BR2-CME"}
>   }
> }
>
>
>
> Dec  5 07:45:42.126: RAS OUTGOING ENCODE BUFFER::=
> 00A00033060008914A000400C8C86E02ED2D28C0B5120B436973636F47617465776179003240023C0501002C0501000280005A005F005A004F004E00450C0180633301806337018099BB0180B3330180018044450180A334018001807778018063530100A44406004200520032002D0043004D0045
> Dec  5 07:45:42.126:
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS INCOMING ENCODE BUFFER::=
> 04800033060008914A00040A005A005F005A004F004E004500C8C86E0306B7
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138:
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS INCOMING PDU ::=
>
> value RasMessage ::= gatekeeperConfirm :
> {
>   requestSeqNum 52
>   protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
>   gatekeeperIdentifier {"Z_ZONE"}
>   rasAddress ipAddress :
>   {
> ip 'C8C86E03'H
> port 1719
>   }
> }
>
>
>
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138: H225 NONSTD OUTGOING PDU ::=
>
> value RasnonStdUsageTypes ::=
> {
>   callModes NULL
> }
>
>
>
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138: H225 NONSTD OUTGOING ENCODE BUFFER::= 40
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138:
> Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=
>
> value RasMessage ::= registrationRequest :
> {
>   requestSeqNum 53
>   protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
>   discoveryComplete TRUE
>   callSignalAddress
>   {
> ipAddress :
> {
>   ip 'C8C86E02'H
>   port 1720
> }
>   }
>   rasAddress
>   {
> ipAddress :
> {
>   ip 'C8C86E02'H
>   port 60717
> }
>   }
>   terminalType
>   {
> vendor
> {
>   vendor
>   {
> t35CountryCode 181
> t35Extension 0
> manufacturerCode 18
>   }
>   productId '436973636F47617465776179'H
>   versionId '32'H
> }
> gateway
> {
>   protocol
>   {
> voice :
> {
>   supportedPrefixes
>   {
>   }
> },h323 :
> {
>   supportedPrefixes
>   {
>   }
>

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Automated Reply Re: "CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 70, Issue 38"

[stewart . mcfarlane]

This is an automated reply to your message "CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 70, Issue 
38" sent to stewart.mcfarl...@provista-uk.com.

Dear ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

Thank you for your email.  

Please note that due to unforseen circumstances I will be out of the office for 
the rest of this week (w/c 17/10/11).

If you require any assistance please contact the provista office on 
08456424642.  For technical assistance please contact 
serviced...@provista-uk.com.

Thanks

Stewart
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] gateway failed to register to GK

[Guoming Zhang]

Hi,

Need to help to figure it out why my gateway would not register to GK.

--GK configure--
HQ#show run | b gatek
gatekeeper
 zone local Z_ZONE ccie.cisco.com 200.200.110.3
 alias static 200.200.210.239 1720 gkid Z_ZONE gateway voip ras 200.200.210.239 
55616 e164 5001 e164 5002 e164 1001 e164 1002
 alias static 200.200.110.2 1720 gkid Z_ZONE gateway voip ras 200.200.110.2 
62766 e164 3006 e164 3002
 no shutdown
...

--- Gateway configure --

BR2-CME#show run in loopback 0
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 234 bytes
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 200.200.110.2 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id Z_ZONE ipaddr 200.200.110.3 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-CME
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 200.200.110.2
end

voice service voip 
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 fax protocol cisco 
 h323
  no call service stop
  call preserve 
 sip
  bind control source-interface Loopback0
  bind media source-interface Loopback0
  registrar server expires max 3600 min 300
!
!

=== debug message  from gateway ==
BR2-CME#show debug

H.225:
  H.225 ASN1 Messages debugging is on

BR2-CME#
Dec  5 07:45:42.122: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=

value RasMessage ::= gatekeeperRequest : 
    {
  requestSeqNum 52
  protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
  rasAddress ipAddress : 
  {
    ip 'C8C86E02'H
    port 60717
  }
  endpointType 
  {
    vendor 
    {
  vendor 
  {
    t35CountryCode 181
    t35Extension 0
    manufacturerCode 18
  }
  productId '436973636F47617465776179'H
  versionId '32'H
    }
    gateway 
    {
  protocol 
  {
    voice : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    },    h323 : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    }
  }
    }
    mc FALSE
    undefinedNode FALSE
  }
  gatekeeperIdentifier {"Z_ZONE"}
  endpointAlias 
  {
  
BR2-CME#  dialedDigits : "3000",
    dialedDigits : "3004",
    dialedDigits : "6688",
    dialedDigits : "8000",
    dialedDigits : "",
    dialedDigits : "1112",
    dialedDigits : "7001",
    dialedDigits : "",
    dialedDigits : "4445",
    dialedDigits : "3020",
    dialedDigits : "711",
    h323-ID : {"BR2-CME"}
  }
    }



Dec  5 07:45:42.126: RAS OUTGOING ENCODE BUFFER::= 
00A00033060008914A000400C8C86E02ED2D28C0B5120B436973636F47617465776179003240023C0501002C0501000280005A005F005A004F004E00450C0180633301806337018099BB0180B3330180018044450180A334018001807778018063530100A44406004200520032002D0043004D0045
Dec  5 07:45:42.126: 
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS INCOMING ENCODE BUFFER::= 
04800033060008914A00040A005A005F005A004F004E004500C8C86E0306B7
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: 
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS INCOMING PDU ::=

value RasMessage ::= gatekeeperConfirm : 
    {
  requestSeqNum 52
  protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
  gatekeeperIdentifier {"Z_ZONE"}
  rasAddress ipAddress : 
  {
    ip 'C8C86E03'H
    port 1719
  }
    }



Dec  5 07:45:42.138: H225 NONSTD OUTGOING PDU ::=

value RasnonStdUsageTypes ::= 
    {
  callModes NULL
    }



Dec  5 07:45:42.138: H225 NONSTD OUTGOING ENCODE BUFFER::= 40
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: 
Dec  5 07:45:42.138: RAS OUTGOING PDU ::=

value RasMessage ::= registrationRequest : 
    {
  requestSeqNum 53
  protocolIdentifier { 0 0 8 2250 0 4 }
  discoveryComplete TRUE
  callSignalAddress 
  {
    ipAddress : 
    {
  ip 'C8C86E02'H
  port 1720
    }
  }
  rasAddress 
  {
    ipAddress : 
    {
  ip 'C8C86E02'H
  port 60717
    }
  }
  terminalType 
  {
    vendor 
    {
  vendor 
  {
    t35CountryCode 181
    t35Extension 0
    manufacturerCode 18
  }
  productId '436973636F47617465776179'H
  versionId '32'H
    }
    gateway 
    {
  protocol 
  {
    voice : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    },    h323 : 
    {
  supportedPrefixes 
  {
  }
    }
  }
    }
    mc FALSE
    undefinedNode FALSE
  }
  terminalAlias 
  {
    dialedDigits : "3000",
    dialedDigits : "3004",
    dialedDigits : "6688",
    dialedDigits : "8000",
    dialedDigits : "",
    dialedDigits : "1112",
    dialedDigits : "7001",
    dialedDigits : "",
    dialedDigits : "4445",
    dialedDigits : "3020",
    dialedDigits : "711",
    h323-ID : {"BR2-CME"}
  }