Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip dhcp excluded-address
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.1 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.254 Thanks, Julien 2012/3/8 Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com I have a simple question Configure a Router to lease out ip addresses in the range 10.10.100.40 to 10.10.100.50 Which one is the best method to exclude unnecessary ip addresses to achieve the result? 1. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.0 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.255 OR 2. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.1 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.254 OR 3. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.1 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.255 OR 4. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.0 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.254 Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip dhcp excluded-address
If the subnet is /24 then the second one is the correct solution Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:49:31 +0530 From: kew...@gmail.com To: ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip dhcp excluded-address I have a simple question Configure a Router to lease out ip addresses in the range 10.10.100.40 to 10.10.100.50 Which one is the best method to exclude unnecessary ip addresses to achieve the result? 1. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.0 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.255 OR 2. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.1 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.254 OR 3. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.1 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.255 OR 4. ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.0 10.10.100.39 ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.100.51 10.10.100.254 Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME CBarge Called phone's display info
When using cBarge under CME, the admin guide states that the 3rd party sees to Barge on the display. In my case I see the ad-hoc conference ephone dn's name instead. Is there something that can be done to have it changed to 'To Barge' instead of 'From xxx'? Also, when the barger leaves and the CFB is tore down, the call is converted back to a 2party call, but the display for the 3rd party is not updated to reflect the other side's CNAM. Is that normal? thx, Juan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs
Ken, All you need to do is let them know you were connected at that time (they can see it in their logs) and they will issue you a voucher. They're cool about it, but don't expect them to go after you to give you the voucher. When you have problems, contact the support immediately. I had all my problems solved and some of my vouchers were given back to me (new voucher, that is), when I was labbing with them. I hope this helps. *Emanuel Damasceno* CCNP Voice On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: Yesterday Proctorlabs was down for more than 1 Hour. Earlier they issued vouchers for such session interruptions. This time I didn't receive a voucher. Anybody faced same issue? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UC SIP integration question
Hi, Creating a CUCM-UC SIP integration do we need to configure SIP authentication and registration under port group configuration page of UC? It seems to be working w/o but DSG for W2Lab7 fills these items, as well. Peter ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question
Questions for the group (use the PDF to help you). in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T1 be dropped?Q4T1 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 20% of Xin English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T2 be dropped?Q4T2 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 50% of X in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T3 be dropped?Q4T2 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 67% of X unless it could grab 33% of X from the common pool, in this case Q4T3 traffic will be dropped when it reaches X. I hope this is correct!! Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question From: vma...@ipexpert.com Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:39:40 -0800 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To: amine_sam...@hotmail.com The speed of the interface (100Mbps) is NOT the buffer size but rather the bandwidth. You configure the breakdown of this within each interface for example: SiteA-Switch(config)#int f1/0/1SiteA-Switch(config-if)#srr bandwidth share 25 25 25 25 The output buffer is when there is congestion for traffic outbound in a specific direction e.g. a gateway/router, server, phone. If the switch's sending rate is greater than the reciever can handle we need to buffer the traffic. Do we want to wait for the buffer to become full and then just drop everything (Tail Drop)? No. We want to apply weights so that lower priority traffic is dropped before the buffers become full (WTD- congestion avoidance). So with your example: f1/0/2 bandwidth: 100Mqueue: 4buffer: 54threshold1: 20threshold2: 50reserved: 67maximum: 400 Q4 has 54% of the buffers assigned to f1/0/2. This has got nothing to do with the speed of the interface. The buffer size looks like a small value - I think 2MB per 4 ports (I don't know if this is published). Please see the attached PDF for a graphic illustration of this interfaces' egress WTD. Questions for the group (use the PDF to help you). in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T1 be dropped?in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T2 be dropped?in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T3 be dropped? Vik Malhi � CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Amine Samaha wrote: Hi Vik, In reference to the blog articles you've mentioned below, kindly, i need to clarify two points related to egress queuing: 1) Let us assume the example below: f1/0/2 bandwidth: 100Mqueue: 4buffer: 54threshold1: 20threshold2: 50reserved: 67maximum: 400 Is it true in this case that Q4 T1 = 20% of 54 = 10.8Mand Q4 T3 = 100% of (67% of 54) = 36.18M and maximum (max BW allowed to be grabbed from the common pool during congestion) is = 400% of 54 = 216M 2) if maximum is set to 100 i could understand that Q4 will not be allowed to borrow any bandwidth from the common pool during congestion. Is this correct Thanks a lot, from: vmalhi@ipexpert.comDate: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:56:33 -0800 To: k...@rogers-mail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question We are using the T1 and T2 values on the egress side in a very different way to the way we use T1/T2 on the ingress side. We are trying to expand our buffers dynamically to prevent the frame from being dropped. How we do this is by not reserving all of our memory per port (in our case we reserved 92%) and contributing to a common pool which can be used for the interfaces that are congested and need the extra buffer space. The dynamic nature of the reserved/max threshold is more flexible that the more regimented method you have described- which may be good for some ports but not others (and you only get two shots since there are only two queue sets). Vik Malhi � CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Kyle Rogers wrote:Vik, Thanks for the explanation, that answered most of my questions and helped quite a bit. My only other question is why someone would carve out 10% of the buffers for a queue, but reserve an amount other than 100%. For example, if I set the Reserved Bandwidth to 80, why wouldn't I just set the buffer setting to 8 instead? The only explanation I can come up with is that I can only use whole percentages in the buffer statement and can't put 8.5%, but if I put 10% buffers and 85% reserved, I can reserve 8.5% of the buffers. Is that the reason or am I missing a piece of the puzzle? I apologize for asking so many questions but I'm sort of at an impass in my studies until I get a firm grasp on this. I will definitely check out the blog. Thanks,Kyle On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: Answers inline. For more info please read my 3 part blog on the Catalyst 3750: http://blog.ipexpert.com/tags/3750-qos/ Vik Malhi � CCIE #13890 Managing
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME and home rack
Could someone be so kind to tell me what version cme is running in BR2? TIA -- Greg Wenzel, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs
I did noticed the same, and today at nearly the same time the same issue again. Contacting support isn't possible right now because the complete proctorlabs.com is not reachable. So you're not alone. -Steven Am 08.03.2012 07:41, schrieb Ken Wyan: Yesterday Proctorlabs was down for more than 1 Hour. Earlier they issued vouchers for such session interruptions. This time I didn't receive a voucher. Anybody faced same issue? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question
Ok- good answer. The one I'm questioning is this: in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T3 be dropped? Q4T2 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 67% of X unless it could grab 33% of X from the common pool, in this case Q4T3 traffic will be dropped when it reaches X. If this is the case what is the purpose of the maximum threshold (M in my PDF). Is this totally unused? This is maximum memory that this queue can have before packets are dropped to quote the 3750 config guide. Q4T1 and Q4T2 are not allowed to expand their buffers to M (400%) since their threshold values are set to 20% and 50% respectively. How about Q4T3? The Q4 buffer could expand to M to avoid dropping traffic placed into Q4T3 (if common pool BW is available!). Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:23 AM, Amine Samaha wrote: Questions for the group (use the PDF to help you). in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T1 be dropped? Q4T1 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 20% of X in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T2 be dropped? Q4T2 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 50% of X in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T3 be dropped? Q4T2 Traffic will be dropped if it exceeds 67% of X unless it could grab 33% of X from the common pool, in this case Q4T3 traffic will be dropped when it reaches X. I hope this is correct!! Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question From: vma...@ipexpert.com Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:39:40 -0800 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To: amine_sam...@hotmail.com The speed of the interface (100Mbps) is NOT the buffer size but rather the bandwidth. You configure the breakdown of this within each interface for example: SiteA-Switch(config)#int f1/0/1 SiteA-Switch(config-if)#srr bandwidth share 25 25 25 25 The output buffer is when there is congestion for traffic outbound in a specific direction e.g. a gateway/router, server, phone. If the switch's sending rate is greater than the reciever can handle we need to buffer the traffic. Do we want to wait for the buffer to become full and then just drop everything (Tail Drop)? No. We want to apply weights so that lower priority traffic is dropped before the buffers become full (WTD- congestion avoidance). So with your example: f1/0/2 bandwidth: 100M queue: 4 buffer: 54 threshold1: 20 threshold2: 50 reserved: 67 maximum: 400 Q4 has 54% of the buffers assigned to f1/0/2. This has got nothing to do with the speed of the interface. The buffer size looks like a small value - I think 2MB per 4 ports (I don't know if this is published). Please see the attached PDF for a graphic illustration of this interfaces' egress WTD. Questions for the group (use the PDF to help you). in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T1 be dropped? in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T2 be dropped? in English when would traffic being placed into egress Q4T3 be dropped? Vik Malhi � CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 6, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Amine Samaha wrote: Hi Vik, In reference to the blog articles you've mentioned below, kindly, i need to clarify two points related to egress queuing: 1) Let us assume the example below: f1/0/2 bandwidth: 100M queue: 4 buffer: 54 threshold1: 20 threshold2: 50 reserved: 67 maximum: 400 Is it true in this case that Q4 T1 = 20% of 54 = 10.8M and Q4 T3 = 100% of (67% of 54) = 36.18M and maximum (max BW allowed to be grabbed from the common pool during congestion) is = 400% of 54 = 216M 2) if maximum is set to 100 i could understand that Q4 will not be allowed to borrow any bandwidth from the common pool during congestion. Is this correct Thanks a lot, from: vma...@ipexpert.com Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:56:33 -0800 To: k...@rogers-mail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question We are using the T1 and T2 values on the egress side in a very different way to the way we use T1/T2 on the ingress side. We are trying to expand our buffers dynamically to prevent the frame from being dropped. How we do this is by not reserving all of our memory per port (in our case we reserved 92%) and contributing to a common pool which can be used for the interfaces that are congested and need the extra buffer space. The dynamic nature of the reserved/max threshold is more flexible that the more regimented method you have described- which may be good for some ports but not others (and you only get two shots since there are only two queue sets). Vik Malhi � CCIE #13890 Managing Partner -
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE
Gentlemen, I am messing here with my NM-CUE. So, for starters I wanna present you with my config: ccn subsystem jatpi ccm-manager address 192.168.250.100 192.168.250.101 ccm-manager user cuejtapi password ccievoice ctiport 6600 6601 6602 end ccn subsystem sip gateway address 192.168.3.1 mwi sip unsolicited dtmf-relay sip-notify end ccn trigger jtapi phonenumber 6500 application voicemail enable max 8 end ccn trigger sip phonenumber 6500 application voicemail enable max 8 end username sitecphone1 create username sitecphone2 create username sitecphone1 phonenumber 6001 username sitecphone2 phonenumber 6002 voicemail mailbox owner sitecphone1 no tut end voicemail mailbox owner sitecphone2 no tut end username sitecphone1 pin 12345 username sitecphone2 pin 12345 Ok. My NM-CUE is properly integrated with my CUCM. When I dial 6500 from my 6001 phone, it says enter your password followed by #. I type the password, it says I have no messages. Everything nice and dandy up to here. So, I dial 6001 from my 4001 phone (HQ), let it ring, it goes to CUE and it says There is no mailbox associated with this extension, goodbye! and it hangs up. Didn't I do everything there in the config? What am I missing? HELP :) *Emanuel Damasceno* CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE
I have seen this on SIP integration to CUC it has to deal with Redirected Number setting is AAR sending this out the PRI or is this over the WAN? On 3/8/12 7:03 PM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.com wrote: Gentlemen, I am messing here with my NM-CUE. So, for starters I wanna present you with my config: ccn subsystem jatpi ccm-manager address 192.168.250.100 192.168.250.101 ccm-manager user cuejtapi password ccievoice ctiport 6600 6601 6602 end ccn subsystem sip gateway address 192.168.3.1 mwi sip unsolicited dtmf-relay sip-notify end ccn trigger jtapi phonenumber 6500 application voicemail enable max 8 end ccn trigger sip phonenumber 6500 application voicemail enable max 8 end username sitecphone1 create username sitecphone2 create username sitecphone1 phonenumber 6001 username sitecphone2 phonenumber 6002 voicemail mailbox owner sitecphone1 no tut end voicemail mailbox owner sitecphone2 no tut end username sitecphone1 pin 12345 username sitecphone2 pin 12345 Ok. My NM-CUE is properly integrated with my CUCM. When I dial 6500 from my 6001 phone, it says enter your password followed by #. I type the password, it says I have no messages. Everything nice and dandy up to here. So, I dial 6001 from my 4001 phone (HQ), let it ring, it goes to CUE and it says There is no mailbox associated with this extension, goodbye! and it hangs up. Didn't I do everything there in the config? What am I missing? HELP :) Emanuel Damasceno CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com Steve Sarrick SE - PA Select 412-480-3861 Join our LinkedIN Group for PA Select opportunities at: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=gid=4133756 image.png___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM
Hi I am running a Demo license on my CUE server, when I add VPIM location it gives me an error that VPIM is a license feature, Please let me kow how you guys are working on VPIM in your home labs. Please see below exact error I get when I tried adding VPIM location. Regards Status [image: error] The requested operation would result in a license violation. [image: error] Unable to create VPIM Location ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE
Check your mask on the voicemail pilot in cucm. On Mar 8, 2012 7:27 PM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.com wrote: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE
Thanks to all replies. Brian, I followed your advice and now it works properly. I left the mask as full +E.164... I removed it and it works fine now. Thank you!!! :) *Emanuel Damasceno* CCNP Voice On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.comwrote: Check your mask on the voicemail pilot in cucm. On Mar 8, 2012 7:27 PM, Emanuel Damasceno aedamasc...@gmail.com wrote: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX issue
I'm working on UCCX in proctor labs, and am not able to assign IPCC extensions to end users. Looking at the Enterprise Parameters, it seems CUCM is not aware that UCCX is installed. However, I can create App's, and dial the triggers just fine.. I've done, a data resync, bounced CTI, rebooted and recreating the rmcm user to no avail... any ideas? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you’re still ahead.? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX issue
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2070656 From: chase mergenthal cm3_...@hotmail.com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:18:15 -0600 To: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX issue I'm working on UCCX in proctor labs, and am not able to assign IPCC extensions to end users. Looking at the Enterprise Parameters, it seems CUCM is not aware that UCCX is installed. However, I can create App's, and dial the triggers just fine.. I've done, a data resync, bounced CTI, rebooted and recreating the rmcm user to no avail... any ideas? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, Quit while you¹re still ahead.? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM
Is this your CUC or CUE? The demo license on CUC does not allow you to add VPIM locations. Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Cisco Nut wrote: Hi I am running a Demo license on my CUE server, when I add VPIM location it gives me an error that VPIM is a license feature, Please let me kow how you guys are working on VPIM in your home labs. Please see below exact error I get when I tried adding VPIM location. Regards Status The requested operation would result in a license violation. Unable to create VPIM Location ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME and home rack
CME ver 7.0(1) This can either be 12.4(20)T or 12.4(22)T Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Gregory Wenzel wrote: Could someone be so kind to tell me what version cme is running in BR2? TIA -- Greg Wenzel, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UC SIP integration question
No- you don't need authentication. Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 8, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Farkas Péter wrote: Hi, Creating a CUCM-UC SIP integration do we need to configure SIP authentication and registration under port group configuration page of UC? It seems to be working w/o but DSG for W2Lab7 fills these items, as well. Peter ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
