Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out

2013-03-09 Thread CCIEing
Hi Jason,

I have question about step # 9 clear counters

is it the normal clear counter command?
e.x:  E1 card
clear counter interface s x/y/z:15

Thanks

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jason Lee jas7...@gmail.com wrote:

 I use this as a strategy for checking my gateway configuration

 Ensure that your are meeting requirements on the following


1. display-ie
2. BCHAN order selection (Ascending, Descending)
3. BCHAN number
   1. How many BCHANs?
  1. If not specified create a full PRI.
  2. If fractional
 1. Set BCHAN Maintenance in Advanced Service Parameters
 2. Check the *Check Status *checkbox in GW config
  4. Clocking
   1. Network clock participate
   2. network clock select 1 t10/0/0
5. ISDN Switch-Type
6. Source-Address
7. 911
   1. Done in gateway section.
  1. Make sure to have routed correctly, SLRG?,
   8. Direct Inward Dial
9. clear counters



 On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) 
 jamp...@cisco.comwrote:

  I am also curious as to the grading on the gateways, I received very
 low marks on this section. Can anyone help?

 ** **

 Thanks

 ** **

 *Jamie Parr*
 Engineer - IT
 jamp...@cisco.com
 Phone: *+44 20 8824 2641*
 Mobile: *+44 7590622049*

 ** **

 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Pixar Perfect
 *Sent:* 26 February 2013 19:35
 *To:* Steve Keller; GARY CLARK
 *Cc:* CCIE Voice OSL
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out

 ** **

 Gary ..you mentioned B channel busyout on service parameter. in my
 understanding this was only needed when you would download the GW config
 from CCM i.e., ccm-manager config. it doesn't make any sense to use this
 service parameter as most of the solution guides (INE, IPXEPERT, 360) do
 not encourage the use of ccm-manager config except initial stage of your
 config and then disable it. I have heard ppl who passed just using standard
 configs but not sure if they did the B channel busy out on service
 parameter. 

 ** **

 ** **

 mgcp 

 mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 --sub

 mgcp dtmf 

 mgcp bind ... (2x2)

 ** **

 ccm-mana fall

 ccm-mana music

 ccm-mana mgcp

 ccm-mana red 10.10.210.10 -- pub

 ** **

 ** **

 if B channel status is *really graded *on the exam then it is one of
 those things that doesn't make sense to have it there but is needed to
 score points [image: Emoji]

 ** **

 experts,

 any comments or advise from the recent Experts ?

 ** **

 ** **

 PIXAR

 ** **

 ** **
  --

 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:31:12 -0500
 From: skeller...@gmail.com
 To: garyclark...@gmail.com
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab7 failed for 1%

 I recieved 29% in RTP on GW Signalling section and Call Routing as well.
 I am very discouraged i could score very low marks on these sections as i
 took my time and felt like i had nailed them. I scored really well in all
 other areas but failed because of these 2 sections. It is a mystery to me
 what the proctor is doing to arrive at that score, when all my calls
 worked, the debugs matched the requirements, i was binding to the correct
 interfaces, setting up the correct protocol and channels,etc. I would love
 to hear what insight folks have as to why the scores could be so low when
 everything looked to be working beautifully, without breaking NDA of course.
 

  

 thanks

 steve



  

 On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, GARY CLARK garyclark...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi friends,

 I got lab 7 in SJC and i completed that in 6 hrs and tested for 2 hrs
 time.

 I thought i have passed 1000% but when i saw my result i was surprised.**
 **

 I almost got everywhere 100% except VG / 29% which was 17 marks section.*
 ***

 Same story with my friends do anyone got 100% in VG for lab 7 

 If anyone interested to share the hidden secrets then welcome as people
 are getting lab 7 repeating now very eager to understand what could be
 wrong.

 Please email me for further discussion.

 We 3 friends attempted out of which i also did busy out channel but that
 also did not helped its 29% only why so 

 ** **

 Regards


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com



 ___ For more information
 regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
 www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

2013-03-09 Thread CCIEing
Hi All,

For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,
and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
PUB as below :

My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or
the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer

Thanks

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

2013-03-09 Thread CCIEing
I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :
dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 3 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad


On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,
 and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
 in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
 PUB as below :

 My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
 peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or
 the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
 chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer

 Thanks

 dial-peer voice 2 voip
 destination-pattern 12341$
 session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
 codec g711ulaw
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
 no vad

 dial-peer voice 2 voip
 destination-pattern 12341$
 session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
 codec g711ulaw
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
 no vad

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

2013-03-09 Thread Amp

Hey,
I would hard code the preferences. Being that the default preference  
in canonical terms is 0, you could set the preference on the pub dial  
peer to preference 1, or you could set the sub dial-peer to preference  
1 and the pub to preference 2. Either way, I would hard code it.


Amp


Quoting CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com:


I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :
dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 3 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad


On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi All,

For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,
and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
PUB as below :

My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or
the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer

Thanks

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad







___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

2013-03-09 Thread CCIEing
Hi,

Thanks all, Got it

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Amp amccar...@cciequest.com wrote:

 Hey,
 I would hard code the preferences. Being that the default preference in
 canonical terms is 0, you could set the preference on the pub dial peer to
 preference 1, or you could set the sub dial-peer to preference 1 and the
 pub to preference 2. Either way, I would hard code it.

 Amp



 Quoting CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com:

  I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :
 dial-peer voice 2 voip
 destination-pattern 12341$
 session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
 codec g711ulaw
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
 no vad

 dial-peer voice 3 voip
 destination-pattern 12341$
 session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address
 codec g711ulaw
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
 no vad


 On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi All,

 For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323
 gateway,
 and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
 in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
 PUB as below :

 My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
 peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers
 or
 the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
 chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer

 Thanks

 dial-peer voice 2 voip
 destination-pattern 12341$
 session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
 codec g711ulaw
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
 no vad

 dial-peer voice 2 voip
 destination-pattern 12341$
 session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
 codec g711ulaw
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
 no vad






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor labs access credentials

2013-03-09 Thread Kirill Groshev
Hi,

It's admin/c1sc0123

Other details you can find in ipexpert workbooks

They should provide it to you if you refer to online support.

Regards,
Kirill

On Saturday, March 9, 2013, donny f wrote:

 hi all ,

 does anyone happen to know  what is the access credential for
 Proctorlabs?i can't find it in their website.

 -user  pass for  UCM , UCCX, and Test PC ?
 - ip address for  UCM and Terminal server , user  pass ?
 - HQ,SB, SC, SW  username and password ?

 Thanks lot

 d

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cli command in UCM 7

2013-03-09 Thread donny f
hi all,

when i tried to check  UCM 7 network config on per page basis ,using  show
network all *page*

However it display over than 1 page, does any one know command so we can
limit the output for several line ?

d
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out

2013-03-09 Thread Pixar Perfect
The B-channel selection order is always default i.e, descending. 

Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 22:29:01 +0300
From: aboaz...@gmail.com
To: jas7...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; garyclark...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out

Hi Jason,
I have question about step # 9 clear counters

is it the normal clear counter command? e.x:  E1 cardclear counter interface s 
x/y/z:15 

Thanks

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Jason Lee jas7...@gmail.com wrote:

I use this as a strategy for checking my gateway configuration


Ensure that your are meeting requirements on the following

display-ieBCHAN order selection (Ascending, Descending)BCHAN numberHow many 
BCHANs?  If not specified create a full PRI.

If fractionalSet BCHAN Maintenance in Advanced Service ParametersCheck the 
Check Status checkbox in GW configClockingNetwork clock participate

network clock select 1 t10/0/0ISDN Switch-TypeSource-Address911Done in gateway 
section.  Make sure to have routed correctly, SLRG?, Direct Inward Dial

clear counters

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Jamie Parr (jamparr) jamp...@cisco.com wrote:










I am also curious as to the grading on the gateways, I received very low marks 
on this section. Can anyone help?


 
Thanks
 

Jamie Parr



Engineer - IT

jamp...@cisco.com

Phone: +44 20 8824 2641

Mobile: +44 7590622049



 


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
On Behalf Of Pixar Perfect

Sent: 26 February 2013 19:35

To: Steve Keller; GARY CLARK

Cc: CCIE Voice OSL

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B Channel Busy Out


 

Gary ..you mentioned B channel busyout on service parameter. in my 
understanding this was only needed when you would download the GW config from 
CCM i.e., ccm-manager config. it doesn't
 make any sense to use this service parameter as most of the solution guides 
(INE, IPXEPERT, 360) do not encourage the use of ccm-manager config except 
initial stage of your config and then disable it. I have heard ppl who passed 
just using standard configs
 but not sure if they did the B channel busy out on service parameter. 

 


 


mgcp 


mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 --sub


mgcp dtmf 


mgcp bind ... (2x2)


 


ccm-mana fall


ccm-mana music


ccm-mana mgcp


ccm-mana red 10.10.210.10 -- pub


 


 


if B channel status is
really graded on the exam then it is one of those things that doesn't make 
sense to have it there but is needed to score points 


 


experts,


any comments or advise from the recent Experts ?


 


 


PIXAR


 


 




Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:31:12 -0500

From: skeller...@gmail.com

To: garyclark...@gmail.com

CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab7 failed for 1%

I recieved 29% in RTP on GW Signalling section and Call Routing as well. I am 
very discouraged i could score very low marks on these sections as i took my 
time and felt like i had nailed
 them. I scored really well in all other areas but failed because of these 2 
sections. It is a mystery to me what the proctor is doing to arrive at that 
score, when all my calls worked, the debugs matched the requirements, i was 
binding to the correct interfaces,
 setting up the correct protocol and channels,etc. I would love to hear what 
insight folks have as to why the scores could be so low when everything looked 
to be working beautifully, without breaking NDA of course.




 


thanks


steve






 


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, GARY CLARK garyclark...@gmail.com wrote:








Hi friends,



I got lab 7 in SJC and i completed that in 6 hrs and tested for 2 hrs time.

I thought i have passed 1000% but when i saw my result i was surprised.

I almost got everywhere 100% except VG / 29% which was 17 marks section.

Same story with my friends do anyone got 100% in VG for lab 7


If anyone interested to share the hidden secrets then welcome as people are 
getting lab 7 repeating now very eager to understand what could be wrong.





Please email me for further discussion.


We 3 friends attempted out of which i also did busy out channel but that also 
did not helped its 29% only why so



 

Regards



___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com





___ For more information regarding 
industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com







___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com



___

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

2013-03-09 Thread Pixar Perfect
Based on my guesstimate these are the mandatory commands needed to make the 
script happy. 
dial-p v 1 voipdesc SUB-dialpeervoice-class codec 1voice-class h323 1no 
vaddestination-pattern 3...$session target ipv4:10.10.210.11   --SUBip qos 
dscp cs3 signalpreference 0dtmf-relay h245-alpha!!!dial-p v 2 voipdesc 
PUB-dialpeervoice-class codec 1voice-class h323 1no vaddestination-pattern 
3...$session target ipv4:10.10.210.10   --PUBip qos dscp cs3 signalpreference 
1dtmf-relay h245-alpha!
Setup and TCP timeout should be set to 3 seconds each under the h323 class.

Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:36:16 +0300
From: aboaz...@gmail.com
To: amccar...@cciequest.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

Hi,
Thanks all, Got it

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Amp amccar...@cciequest.com wrote:

Hey,

I would hard code the preferences. Being that the default preference in 
canonical terms is 0, you could set the preference on the pub dial peer to 
preference 1, or you could set the sub dial-peer to preference 1 and the pub to 
preference 2. Either way, I would hard code it.




Amp





Quoting CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com:




I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :

dial-peer voice 2 voip

destination-pattern 12341$

session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address

codec g711ulaw

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco

no vad



dial-peer voice 3 voip

destination-pattern 12341$

session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address

codec g711ulaw

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco

no vad





On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing aboaz...@gmail.com wrote:




Hi All,



For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,

and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,

in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and

PUB as below :



My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial

peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or

the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will

chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer



Thanks



dial-peer voice 2 voip

destination-pattern 12341$

session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address

codec g711ulaw

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco

no vad



dial-peer voice 2 voip

destination-pattern 12341$

session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address

codec g711ulaw

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco

no vad
















___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] all incoming calls to HQ phones failing

2013-03-09 Thread Jaleel ccie
Hi,

I am having problem with incoming calls to HQ phones, outgoing calls from
HQ phones are working. I can't even call HQ phone from HQ-PSTN number.
I have gone through PSTN config several times but I couldn't find any thing
wrong with it. HQ Router is a mgcp gateway and I'm using only 6 Channels
for T1 controller.

What else can I do or check to fix this problem.


Farooq
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] all incoming calls to HQ phones failing

2013-03-09 Thread Hesham Abdelkereem
Hi Farooq,

You should provide the group with the PSTN configuration here in order to help 
you solve your issues.

Thanks,
Hesham
On Mar 9, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Jaleel ccie clubjal...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I am having problem with incoming calls to HQ phones, outgoing calls from HQ 
 phones are working. I can't even call HQ phone from HQ-PSTN number.
 I have gone through PSTN config several times but I couldn't find any thing 
 wrong with it. HQ Router is a mgcp gateway and I'm using only 6 Channels for 
 T1 controller.
 
 What else can I do or check to fix this problem.
 
 
 Farooq
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] all incoming calls to HQ phones failing

2013-03-09 Thread vignesh sethuraman
Hi Farooq,

Did you see calls coming into the mgcp gw, use debug isdn q931 to check.

Try no mgcp  mgcp on the Hq gw.

Thanks,
Viki
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com