[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge question
hi Guys,I am configuring cbarge on CME. 1) Could anyone tell me what are Cbarge's advantages or a normal hardware conference bridge?2) Also how do I test cbarge once configured?singhGet Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] incoming call from PSTN
I agree with Ikizoo on the fact that it shouldn't matter what the PSTN is handing off to your gateway. You have multiple ways to handle digit manipulation on ingress: 1. MGCP, chop down to 4d at the gateway 2. Using a translation pattern that the gateway CSS can see 3. H323, use voice translation-profile/-rule That said, I don't agree with the statement the PSTN can't send a +. 1. If the PSTN is outpulsing the call on one of the PRIs then it can most certainly send + 2. If the PSTN is integrated via SIP trunk (pseudo ITSP) then it can send a + 3. If the PSTN is integrated via H323 trunk (direct or via GK) then it can't send a + The PSTN phone is registered to CME and I assume it is registered as SCCP. So, it won't be H323, it will be POTS. If the phone is running the right firmware (I think 9.1(1) or later?) then it can dial a + by pressing the * key for a second or two. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:57 PM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: When you have the strip digits at gateway level set to 4, and as long as 2220 is a DID then from wherever it is called, it will go to the VM. Regarding plus dialing of VM DID from PSTN, it will be/is registered to CME (h.323), so I don't expect it will send a plus. My two cents. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:51 AM, ikizoo hello ikiz...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, when they asked to make sure VM pilot (+1408200) can be called directly from PSTN. do i have to make a call from PSTN and dial +1408200? , but pstn phone not support to dial '+'. is that mean dial 1408200 from pstn phone or some tricks behind here? thanks advance -ikizoo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge question
Singh, I am not sure how to answer question #1. cBarge requires a hardware conference bridge so I don't know how one would compare/contrast the two. If you are asking about cBarge vs. ad-hoc or MML conferencing then the main difference is who initiates the conference. With cBarge a party with a shared line appearance initiates the conference by barging in on an active call. With adhoc a person already involved in the call is pulling another party in. With MML, a person initiates the bridge that others can dial into. Once configured, you would stand up an active call on the shared line and then barge in from the phone not involved in the call. -BIll -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 2:37 AM, singh wrote: hi Guys, I am configuring cbarge on CME. 1) Could anyone tell me what are Cbarge's advantages or a normal hardware conference bridge? 2) Also how do I test cbarge once configured? -singh Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] incoming call from PSTN
Thats just a statement to test the VM from PSTN phone no worries no tricks thanks On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: I agree with Ikizoo on the fact that it shouldn't matter what the PSTN is handing off to your gateway. You have multiple ways to handle digit manipulation on ingress: 1. MGCP, chop down to 4d at the gateway 2. Using a translation pattern that the gateway CSS can see 3. H323, use voice translation-profile/-rule That said, I don't agree with the statement the PSTN can't send a +. 1. If the PSTN is outpulsing the call on one of the PRIs then it can most certainly send + 2. If the PSTN is integrated via SIP trunk (pseudo ITSP) then it can send a + 3. If the PSTN is integrated via H323 trunk (direct or via GK) then it can't send a + The PSTN phone is registered to CME and I assume it is registered as SCCP. So, it won't be H323, it will be POTS. If the phone is running the right firmware (I think 9.1(1) or later?) then it can dial a + by pressing the * key for a second or two. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:57 PM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: When you have the strip digits at gateway level set to 4, and as long as 2220 is a DID then from wherever it is called, it will go to the VM. Regarding plus dialing of VM DID from PSTN, it will be/is registered to CME (h.323), so I don't expect it will send a plus. My two cents. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:51 AM, ikizoo hello ikiz...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All, when they asked to make sure VM pilot (+1408200) can be called directly from PSTN. do i have to make a call from PSTN and dial +1408200? , but pstn phone not support to dial '+'. is that mean dial 1408200 from pstn phone or some tricks behind here? thanks advance -ikizoo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings
I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a very basic (?) question: i. When I *have to *select the *isdn switch-type *to *primary-ni *(NI2) in the IOS before configuring the controller, and ii. if I can select the *dtmf relay method *to *out-of-band *for MGCP in IOS itself is it necessary/mandatory, *in lab exam point of view, *to select the said configs (ISDN Switch Type to NI2 and DTMF Relay Method to OOB) while configuring MGCP in the CUCM? Just a curiosity. Thanks, -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings
Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI. For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions in the lab fail to set the dtmf correctly. It also fails to set ccm-manager switchback correctly. So, I do that in IOS as well. That said, I do set the appropriate values in the GUI because I am not sure how they grade and, well, I am already in the screen dorking around. It would be interesting to here what others do for the ISDN switchtype. I do know that the CCM-Manager Config process will correctly set that information for you. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a very basic (?) question: i. When I have to select the isdn switch-type to primary-ni (NI2) in the IOS before configuring the controller, and ii. if I can select the dtmf relay method to out-of-band for MGCP in IOS itself is it necessary/mandatory, in lab exam point of view, to select the said configs (ISDN Switch Type to NI2 and DTMF Relay Method to OOB) while configuring MGCP in the CUCM? Just a curiosity. Thanks, -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings
Well, sure. If you try to provision a pri-group manually and you haven't defined a switchtype then the CLI will bark at you. I was making an assumption that you were using ccm-manager config. My apologies. If you don't use ccm-manager config then you will need to specify switchtype. If you do use ccm-manager config then you can specify the switchtype in IOS or the config process will do it for you. The ccm-manager config process will not set dtmf nor will it set ccm-manager switchb (if that matters to you). -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: William, Are you sure we don't need isdn switch-type in IOS before configuring Controllers? As when I try to configure I always get the error that I should configure the said item first. pri-group time 1-3 ser mgcp %ISDN switch-type must be set first. I am following Device based approach, so until I have my ios ready I won't come to the GUI. Is it due to the approach, where I will configure everything in IOS before going to the GUI? On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:25 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI. For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions in the lab fail to set the dtmf correctly. It also fails to set ccm-manager switchback correctly. So, I do that in IOS as well. That said, I do set the appropriate values in the GUI because I am not sure how they grade and, well, I am already in the screen dorking around. It would be interesting to here what others do for the ISDN switchtype. I do know that the CCM-Manager Config process will correctly set that information for you. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a very basic (?) question: i. When I have to select the isdn switch-type to primary-ni (NI2) in the IOS before configuring the controller, and ii. if I can select the dtmf relay method to out-of-band for MGCP in IOS itself is it necessary/mandatory, in lab exam point of view, to select the said configs (ISDN Switch Type to NI2 and DTMF Relay Method to OOB) while configuring MGCP in the CUCM? Just a curiosity. Thanks, -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings
It fail sometimes, what I do is set it manually after select it in the GUI. Abel Mateo On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI. For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions in the lab fail to set the dtmf correctly. It also fails to set ccm-manager switchback correctly. So, I do that in IOS as well. That said, I do set the appropriate values in the GUI because I am not sure how they grade and, well, I am already in the screen dorking around. It would be interesting to here what others do for the ISDN switchtype. I do know that the CCM-Manager Config process will correctly set that information for you. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a very basic (?) question: i. When I *have to *select the *isdn switch-type *to *primary-ni *(NI2) in the IOS before configuring the controller, and ii. if I can select the *dtmf relay method *to *out-of-band *for MGCP in IOS itself is it necessary/mandatory, *in lab exam point of view, *to select the said configs (ISDN Switch Type to NI2 and DTMF Relay Method to OOB) while configuring MGCP in the CUCM? Just a curiosity. Thanks, -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings
Well, I don't use/haven't used ccm-manager config. I rather configure it manually. So, from this, at least what I will follow is to configure it manually in IOS, and then change them in GUI appropriately to match configured values. Thanks for the views, and other views are most welcome. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Abel ... midga...@gmail.com wrote: It fail sometimes, what I do is set it manually after select it in the GUI. Abel Mateo On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI. For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions in the lab fail to set the dtmf correctly. It also fails to set ccm-manager switchback correctly. So, I do that in IOS as well. That said, I do set the appropriate values in the GUI because I am not sure how they grade and, well, I am already in the screen dorking around. It would be interesting to here what others do for the ISDN switchtype. I do know that the CCM-Manager Config process will correctly set that information for you. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a very basic (?) question: i. When I *have to *select the *isdn switch-type *to *primary-ni *(NI2) in the IOS before configuring the controller, and ii. if I can select the *dtmf relay method *to *out-of-band *for MGCP in IOS itself is it necessary/mandatory, *in lab exam point of view, *to select the said configs (ISDN Switch Type to NI2 and DTMF Relay Method to OOB) while configuring MGCP in the CUCM? Just a curiosity. Thanks, -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge question
I have a shared line 4003on 2 of my site Cphones ( registered to CME) .I call from the HQ phone to the shared line.I answer the call onSC phone 2 . The shared line is active which softkey do I press from SC phone 1 to barge in?The current tempate for the ephones is the followingephonetemplate1 softkeys remoteinuseNewcall CBarge softkeys idleCfwdall ConfList Dnd Gpickup Join Newcall Pickup Redial softkeys connectedAcct ConfList Confrn Endcall Hold Join LiveRcd Mobility ParBut I don't see the CBarge softkey on SC phone 1. Why? Original message From:William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com Date: 9 Apr 13 16:53:53Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIEVoice] CBarge questionTo: Cc: ccievo...@onlinestudylist.com ccievo...@onlinestudylist.com Singh,I am not sure how to answer question #1. cBarge requires a hardware conference bridge so I don't know how one would compare/contrast the two. If you are asking about cBarge vs. adhoc or MML conferencing then the main difference is who initiates the c onference. With cBarge a party with a shared line appearance initiates the conference by barging in on an active call. With adhoc a person already involved in the call is pulling another party in. With MML, a person initiates the bridge that others can dial into. Once configured, you would stand up an active call on the shared line and then barge in from the phone not involved in the call.BIll William Bellblog: http://ucguerrilla.comtwitter: @ucguerrillaOn Apr 9, 2013, at 2:37 AM, singh wrote:hi Guys,I am configuring cbarge on CME. 1) Could anyone tell me what are Cbarge's advantages or a normal hardware conference bridge?2) Also how do I test cbarge once configured?singhGet Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comAre you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comGet Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge question
Ensure that the template is assigned to the ephone. Also, make sure that you have privacy turned off on the ephone. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:44 AM, singh wrote: I have a shared line 4003 on 2 of my site C phones ( registered to CME) . I call from the HQ phone to the shared line. I answer the call on SC phone 2 . The shared line is active which softkey do I press from SC phone 1 to barge in? The current tempate for the ephones is the following ephone-template 1 softkeys remote-in-use Newcall CBarge softkeys idle Cfwdall ConfList Dnd Gpickup Join Newcall Pickup Redial softkeys connected Acct ConfList Confrn Endcall Hold Join LiveRcd Mobility Par But I don't see the CBarge softkey on SC phone 1 . Why? -- Original message -- From:William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com Date: 9 Apr 13 16:53:53 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge question To: Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Singh, I am not sure how to answer qu estion #1. cBarge requires a hardware conference bridge so I don't know how one would compare/contrast the two. If you are asking about cBarge vs. ad-hoc or MML conferencing then the main difference is who initiates the conference. With cBarge a party with a shared line appearance initiates the conference by barging in on an active call. With adhoc a person already involved in the call is pulling another party in. With MML, a person initiates the bridge that others can dial into. Once configured, you would stand up an active call on the shared line and then barge in from the phone not involved in the call. -BIll -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 2:37 AM, singh wrote: hi Guys, I am configuring cbarge on CME. 1) Could anyone tell me what are Cbarge's advantages or a normal hardware conference bridge? 2) Also how do I test cbarge once configured? -singh Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings
Vik told us this in the troubleshooting class. If you are using CCM-manager config, then it won't configure the following - network clock participate and network clock select - no switchback and no dtmf - no bind control and no bind media You have to enter them manually after the MGCP configuration are pushed from CUCM to the gateway and you enter no ccm-manager config Network-clock (participate and select) ccm switchback immediate mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out mgcp bind control source-interface loop0 mgcp bind media source-interface lopp0 There are other commands like the pri-group timeslot and the backhaul link to CUCM under the signaling interface - if partial pri is required. Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:19:52 +0545 From: bring...@gmail.com To: midga...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP IOS vs GUI settings Well, I don't use/haven't used ccm-manager config. I rather configure it manually. So, from this, at least what I will follow is to configure it manually in IOS, and then change them in GUI appropriately to match configured values. Thanks for the views, and other views are most welcome. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Abel ... midga...@gmail.com wrote: It fail sometimes, what I do is set it manually after select it in the GUI. Abel Mateo On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:40 AM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Not sure about item i. I always set the switch type in the GUI. For dtmf relay, I always set in IOS because I believe the versions in the lab fail to set the dtmf correctly. It also fails to set ccm-manager switchback correctly. So, I do that in IOS as well. That said, I do set the appropriate values in the GUI because I am not sure how they grade and, well, I am already in the screen dorking around. It would be interesting to here what others do for the ISDN switchtype. I do know that the CCM-Manager Config process will correctly set that information for you. -Bill --William Bellblog: http://ucguerrilla.comtwitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: I know that MGCP is a client/server protocol, and even that said I have a very basic (?) question: i. When I have to select the isdn switch-type to primary-ni (NI2) in the IOS before configuring the controller, and ii. if I can select the dtmf relay method to out-of-band for MGCP in IOS itself is it necessary/mandatory, in lab exam point of view, to select the said configs (ISDN Switch Type to NI2 and DTMF Relay Method to OOB) while configuring MGCP in the CUCM? Just a curiosity. Thanks, -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] incoming call from PSTN
thanks all for valuable inputs.it gets more clear now, after 2 attempts what i learned lesson is have to verify whatever they asking, no assumption. :-) lots of excellent engineer failed exam with tiny mistake or lack of time, i believe that fail and pass are not much different here. -ikizoo Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 17:16:02 +0530 From: jacobjon...@gmail.com To: b...@ucguerrilla.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] incoming call from PSTN Thats just a statement to test the VM from PSTN phone no worries no tricks thanks On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:49 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: I agree with Ikizoo on the fact that it shouldn't matter what the PSTN is handing off to your gateway. You have multiple ways to handle digit manipulation on ingress: 1. MGCP, chop down to 4d at the gateway2. Using a translation pattern that the gateway CSS can see3. H323, use voice translation-profile/-rule That said, I don't agree with the statement the PSTN can't send a +. 1. If the PSTN is outpulsing the call on one of the PRIs then it can most certainly send +2. If the PSTN is integrated via SIP trunk (pseudo ITSP) then it can send a + 3. If the PSTN is integrated via H323 trunk (direct or via GK) then it can't send a + The PSTN phone is registered to CME and I assume it is registered as SCCP. So, it won't be H323, it will be POTS. If the phone is running the right firmware (I think 9.1(1) or later?) then it can dial a + by pressing the * key for a second or two. -Bill --William Bellblog: http://ucguerrilla.comtwitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:57 PM, Suresh Bhandari wrote: When you have the strip digits at gateway level set to 4, and as long as 2220 is a DID then from wherever it is called, it will go to the VM. Regarding plus dialing of VM DID from PSTN, it will be/is registered to CME (h.323), so I don't expect it will send a plus. My two cents. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:51 AM, ikizoo hello ikiz...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi All,when they asked to make sure VM pilot (+1408200) can be called directly from PSTN.do i have to make a call from PSTN and dial +1408200? , but pstn phone not support to dial '+'. is that mean dial 1408200 from pstn phone or some tricks behind here? thanks advance-ikizoo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Suresh Bhandari ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] help with sip proxy domain on cups
trying to change the proxy domain name on the presence server for the past hour now with no luck. pls guys any input on hw to go about it?? thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
QoS Guru's, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don't want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice... I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default And I passed From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru's, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don't want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
From those numbers, those are the CIR values of the PVC, so you have to use those values. They physical circuit would be a T1, which is academic as the carrier can discard above the committed rate. Hope that helps, Mark From: Barrera, Hugo hugo.barr...@nexusis.commailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 4:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru’s, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth…so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don’t want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by word. On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Here is my take, and take it at face value.. ** ** When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice…** ** ** ** I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default…. ** ** And I passed…. ** ** ** ** ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Barrera, Hugo *Sent:* Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations ** ** QoS Guru’s, ** ** In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth…so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do?*** * ** ** Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don’t want to review an srnd? ** ** *Hugo * ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct? Does this look right? map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 768000 frame-relay bc 7680 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 768000 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! USING ONLY 95% OF BANDWIDTH: map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 729600 frame-relay bc 7296 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 729600 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! Regards, Hugo From: Abel ... [mailto:midga...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:47 PM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Barrera, Hugo Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by word. On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice... I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default And I passed From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru's, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don't want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
Hmmm I cannot remember but I am 95% sure :) that the fragmentation is not for links over 768... Hence the map-class for the link to Site C is incorrect... remove the frame-relay fragment 960 From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:17 PM To: Abel ...; Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct? Does this look right? map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 768000 frame-relay bc 7680 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 768000 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! USING ONLY 95% OF BANDWIDTH: map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 729600 frame-relay bc 7296 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 729600 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! Regards, Hugo From: Abel ... [mailto:midga...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:47 PM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Barrera, Hugo Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by word. On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice... I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default And I passed From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru's, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don't want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
I believe that a 768kbps link falls within the recommendation to leverage a fragmentation mechanism. So, I believe that the map-classes are accurate. Hugo, I know you said you don't want to review a SRND but I definitely recommend you take the time to a look at the WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design in the QoS SRND. It is an informative section and not as much of a yawn fest as you may think. Also, if you are ever asked to do class-based traffic shaping, you will be comfortable where to find some good examples. Remember that the QoS SRND is made available to you on the candidate machine. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Leslie Meade wrote: Hmmm I cannot remember but I am 95% sure J that the fragmentation is not for links over 768… Hence the map-class for the link to Site C is incorrect… remove the frame-relay fragment 960 From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:17 PM To: Abel ...; Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct? Does this look right? map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 768000 frame-relay bc 7680 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 768000 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! USING ONLY 95% OF BANDWIDTH: map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 729600 frame-relay bc 7296 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 729600 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! Regards, Hugo From: Abel ... [mailto:midga...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:47 PM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Barrera, Hugo Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by word. On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice… I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default…. And I passed…. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru’s, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth…so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don’t want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dial-peer Preference
Hi All, I know this is a silly question, but it's been bugging me. Does the lab script care if your dial-peers have preference 0 (no preference configured) or Preference 1 / 2 configured as it is below? I realize that preference 0 (no preference) would be the dial-peer used if there is a match on both peers, but would the below be graded differently? I'm used to assigning a preference and leaving no preference always make me feel like I missed something. dial-peer voice 100 pots preference 1 destination-pattern 9.[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 200 pots preference 2 destination-pattern 9.[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 Thanks much. Josh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
I will review thanks Bill. Regards, Hugo On Apr 9, 2013, at 5:27 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.commailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: I believe that a 768kbps link falls within the recommendation to leverage a fragmentation mechanism. So, I believe that the map-classes are accurate. Hugo, I know you said you don't want to review a SRND but I definitely recommend you take the time to a look at the WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design in the QoS SRND. It is an informative section and not as much of a yawn fest as you may think. Also, if you are ever asked to do class-based traffic shaping, you will be comfortable where to find some good examples. Remember that the QoS SRND is made available to you on the candidate machine. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Leslie Meade wrote: Hmmm I cannot remember but I am 95% sure :) that the fragmentation is not for links over 768… Hence the map-class for the link to Site C is incorrect… remove the frame-relay fragment 960 From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:17 PM To: Abel ...; Leslie Meade Cc: mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct? Does this look right? map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 768000 frame-relay bc 7680 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 768000 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! USING ONLY 95% OF BANDWIDTH: map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 729600 frame-relay bc 7296 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 729600 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! Regards, Hugo From: Abel ... [mailto:midga...@gmail.commailto:midga...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:47 PM To: Leslie Meade Cc: mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Barrera, Hugo Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by word. On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade mailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.comleslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice… I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default…. And I passed…. From: mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru’s, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth…so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don’t want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
First I used the SRND for LAN QoS and I believe that to be the best way, but I'm sure there are many other flavors. I found using the SRND for LAN QoS to be quick and easy, page 107. It's very efficient way to do it and eliminates mistakes. For WAN QoS I used auto qos voip trust or auto qos voip depending on the question wording. In addition I did QoS first and I know some people disagree with that, but it worked for me speed wise using the device based approach. I did not use the SRND for WAN QoS, but agree is a good reference to have since it's on the desktop of the lab. I used the 95% rule as well as removing the rmon commands. I passed. I agree with most of the comments especially read the question very carefully. Michael Sears Designing and Implementing Cisco Unified Communications on Unified Computing Systems -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 7:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 86, Issue 58 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Dial-peer Preference (Josh Petro) 2. Re: WAN QoS Calculations (Barrera, Hugo) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 20:43:26 -0400 From: Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dial-peer Preference Message-ID: ca+m12bxfzo1q61o5jv8bh-h4e3+bkndxbs2xvhd3md713g4...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi All, I know this is a silly question, but it's been bugging me. Does the lab script care if your dial-peers have preference 0 (no preference configured) or Preference 1 / 2 configured as it is below? I realize that preference 0 (no preference) would be the dial-peer used if there is a match on both peers, but would the below be graded differently? I'm used to assigning a preference and leaving no preference always make me feel like I missed something. dial-peer voice 100 pots preference 1 destination-pattern 9.[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 200 pots preference 2 destination-pattern 9.[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 Thanks much. Josh -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20130409/c53eaa82/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 01:08:35 + From: Barrera, Hugo hugo.barr...@nexusis.com To: William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations Message-ID: 22e3eddc-0e84-41f5-a668-f64e1a8d9...@nexusis.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 I will review thanks Bill. Regards, Hugo On Apr 9, 2013, at 5:27 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.commailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: I believe that a 768kbps link falls within the recommendation to leverage a fragmentation mechanism. So, I believe that the map-classes are accurate. Hugo, I know you said you don't want to review a SRND but I definitely recommend you take the time to a look at the WAN Edge Link-Specific QoS Design in the QoS SRND. It is an informative section and not as much of a yawn fest as you may think. Also, if you are ever asked to do class-based traffic shaping, you will be comfortable where to find some good examples. Remember that the QoS SRND is made available to you on the candidate machine. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Leslie Meade wrote: Hmmm I cannot remember but I am 95% sure :) that the fragmentation is not for links over 768? Hence the map-class for the link to Site C is incorrect? remove the frame-relay fragment 960 From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:17 PM To: Abel ...; Leslie Meade Cc: mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct? Does this look right? map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dial-peer Preference
As I know no preference means he will take the top-down order with ascending dial-peer order based on pot number. I believe if you stated preference you can bypass the order of dial-peer Thanks, Ravi On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Josh Petro josh.pe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I know this is a silly question, but it's been bugging me. Does the lab script care if your dial-peers have preference 0 (no preference configured) or Preference 1 / 2 configured as it is below? I realize that preference 0 (no preference) would be the dial-peer used if there is a match on both peers, but would the below be graded differently? I'm used to assigning a preference and leaving no preference always make me feel like I missed something. dial-peer voice 100 pots preference 1 destination-pattern 9.[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 200 pots preference 2 destination-pattern 9.[2-9]... port 0/0/0:15 Thanks much. Josh ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] [ccm-manager config]
Hellow Experts, how we can use ccm-manager commands to achieve mgcp configuration. How we could carefully use in the lab. Thanks, Ravi. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
