Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ccie collaboration
A former employee of ipexpert is the only person outside of Cisco to pass to new lab Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Shree Pandey Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 11:12 AM To: Dharambir Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ccie collaboration Hi Dharambir, The Collaboration lab has started on form March 3rd itself whereas the CCIE Collaboration guy ... I am not sure about this ...!!! Thanks Regards , Shree Pandey +91-9407039882 +91-8792117678 On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Dharambir dharambi...@gmail.commailto:dharambi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Is ccie collaboration lab exam started now?? anyone passed ? Sent from Samsung Mobile ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinchttp://www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-)
Snif snif... Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilson.sam...@bt.com Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:57 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RIP CCIE-Voice :-) Welcome CCIE Collaboration! (Sorry, the thread became silent) ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] need help
My gues would be the pstn pri does not have 12 channels configured. The degustation is showing that the t1 is taking channel 12 and it is being rejected by the router. To test this theory change the bchannel order around and I bet it works... Sent from my iPad On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Amit Sharma aryan231...@gmail.com wrote: when i try to call from hq phone to 911 or locla number...showing busy...! please see the attached log and running config...! i also try to call with hq mgcp fail then it should go with br1 h.323 gateway... that also not moving... no logs coming on any router...! can anyone help me? -- Thanks Regard's Amit Sharma hq.txt mgcp.txt br1.txt ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaberation
Wonder what this means http://ciscocert.force.com/english/articles/Article/CCIE-Collaboration-Certification-CCIE-Voice-can-be-recertified-EN?retURL=%2Fenglish%2Fapex%2Finstantanswers%3FproductCategory%3DCCIE_collaborationpopup=false The CCIE Collaboration certification does not directly affect current CCIE Voice certification holders. Current CCIE Voice holders will be able to recertify by passing any CCIE exam including the new CCIE Collaboration written or lab exams. The CCIE Collaboration certification provides new career opportunities for CCIE Voice certification holders Leslie Meade [Description: Description: Long View Systems] Bach Information Technology CCNA CCVP CCIE Voice 38727 Network Consultant .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com [Description: Linkedin]http://www.linkedin.com/company/17908 [Description: Twitter] http://twitter.com/LongViewSystems [Description: Facebook] http://www.facebook.com/longviewsystems [Description: Google+] http://gplus.to/longviewsystems [Description: Facebook] http://www.youtube.com/longviewsystems [Description: 50 Best Managed Company] www.longviewsystems.comhttp://www.longviewsystems.com/ This message and any attached documents are only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential and may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, retransmission, or other disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify the sender immediately, and delete the original message. inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpginline: image004.jpginline: image005.jpginline: image006.jpginline: image007.gif___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: The question is... what if anything can we do ? Where would we start.. Original message From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.commailto:m...@markholloway.com Date: To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to remain CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is Voice and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look at it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the name of the new CCIE really should be anyway. The core of the Voice blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing another. In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start over again with Collaboration. There are too many similarities between the two. On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com wrote: Ranting about it won't change anything. I read on line that when they retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or lab. If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag. That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the first from my reading. Storage had this happen earlier this year as have several others. See here with the snippet. Now the second is a wiki so we would want official confirmation. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_tracks Retired CCIE tracks Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by Cisco. These are: * WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the StrataComhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom acquisition) * ISP Dial CCIE * SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue) * Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely different design tests in format and subjects examined) People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs, provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the title CCIE, rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization. So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of CCIE if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal. Bill On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.com wrote: Vik, A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice is still the toughest one i know some double IE's who couldn't pass Voice. If Cisco has lost faith in re-cert, that should apply to every track, not just Voice. Naturally, they should have renamed Certification to Voice/Collaboration or Voice/Video etc introduced new version. If they had to do this retiring thing, why didn't they do when they introduced V3 from V2 ? Old days of Call Manager based on Windows literally everything based on windows, Analog endpoints/VGs/ATAs etc. Retiring CCIE Voice makes no sense whatsoever whether be it from marketing point of view or any other. Why can't big buck makers at Cisco just rename a Cert rather than do something completely rubbish. With just one announcement, they have made many people lose faith in Certification process. I am sure Voice labs will be the most deserted labs until Feb 2014. At the end of day, we can only request Cisco to re-consider this decision. I hope folks concerned collaborate put their suggestions forward on Cisco Support Community direct to Cisco Certification teams so they realize what they are doing is NOT right. I will take some months for us to digest this news. Thanks On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: As I said before - I would think product marketing had something to say about this. Just my opinion. Why for the last 4 years has there been a lack of Microsoft products in the exam? Are Microsoft are not relevant or it Marketing bullying the content team? At the same time there are many folks out there with a voice IE who can't spell SIP. So what do you do about those folks? Historically Cisco have trusted
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
The question is... what if anything can we do ? Where would we start.. Original message From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com Date: To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to remain CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is Voice and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look at it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the name of the new CCIE really should be anyway. The core of the Voice blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing another. In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start over again with Collaboration. There are too many similarities between the two. On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com wrote: Ranting about it won't change anything. I read on line that when they retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or lab. If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag. That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the first from my reading. Storage had this happen earlier this year as have several others. See here with the snippet. Now the second is a wiki so we would want official confirmation. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_tracks Retired CCIE tracks Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by Cisco. These are: * WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the StrataComhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom acquisition) * ISP Dial CCIE * SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue) * Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely different design tests in format and subjects examined) People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs, provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the title CCIE, rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization. So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of CCIE if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal. Bill On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.com wrote: Vik, A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice is still the toughest one i know some double IE's who couldn't pass Voice. If Cisco has lost faith in re-cert, that should apply to every track, not just Voice. Naturally, they should have renamed Certification to Voice/Collaboration or Voice/Video etc introduced new version. If they had to do this retiring thing, why didn't they do when they introduced V3 from V2 ? Old days of Call Manager based on Windows literally everything based on windows, Analog endpoints/VGs/ATAs etc. Retiring CCIE Voice makes no sense whatsoever whether be it from marketing point of view or any other. Why can't big buck makers at Cisco just rename a Cert rather than do something completely rubbish. With just one announcement, they have made many people lose faith in Certification process. I am sure Voice labs will be the most deserted labs until Feb 2014. At the end of day, we can only request Cisco to re-consider this decision. I hope folks concerned collaborate put their suggestions forward on Cisco Support Community direct to Cisco Certification teams so they realize what they are doing is NOT right. I will take some months for us to digest this news. Thanks On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.com wrote: As I said before - I would think product marketing had something to say about this. Just my opinion. Why for the last 4 years has there been a lack of Microsoft products in the exam? Are Microsoft are not relevant or it Marketing bullying the content team? At the same time there are many folks out there with a voice IE who can't spell SIP. So what do you do about those folks? Historically Cisco have trusted their recertification process as a valid check and balance. It looks like they have lost a bit of faith in the written exams as a valid means to recertification- and that is no surprise to any of us as we all know a 2nd grader could pass one of those exams (and I don't condone the means through which that is possible). When the dust has settled I will be advising all existing voice IE's two things: look at this as
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced
Yea I just looked at that... wow disappointing all around... Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of William Bell Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:12 PM To: Martin Sloan Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; vma...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced They did disable commenting. That's interesting. -- William Bell, CCIE #38914 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On May 29, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Martin Sloan wrote: Is it just me or did they disable commenting on the v4 lab topics post? https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20804 I wanted to commend William Bell on hitting the nail on the head and put my own 2 cents in. I'm able to place a comment in the equipment list post here: https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20804 but not the other. Does anyone have comment options on the exam topics page? On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.commailto:rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Ben Ng comes to mind On May 29, 2013, at 7:28 AM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: The question is... what if anything can we do ? Where would we start.. Original message From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.commailto:m...@markholloway.com Date: To: Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com,Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.commailto:vma...@ipexpert.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Collaboration officially announced Granted we all know that taking any CCIE Written will allow us to remain CCIE's even if Voice is retired, but I think the frustration is Voice and Collaboration are not THAT far apart and no matter how you look at it, it all falls under Cisco Unified Communications, which is what the name of the new CCIE really should be anyway. The core of the Voice blueprint is still there. The Collaboration equipment list looks like a refresh of current products, not a forklift of one technology replacing another. In my opinion this was too harsh of a move to retire Voice and start over again with Collaboration. There are too many similarities between the two. On May 29, 2013, at 7:10 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com wrote: Ranting about it won't change anything. I read on line that when they retire your CCIE, you can still renew by passing a CCIE level written or lab. If this is true then you do not loose your CCIE just the voice tag. That seems to be a difficult pill to swallow but it would not be the first from my reading. Storage had this happen earlier this year as have several others. See here with the snippet. Now the second is a wiki so we would want official confirmation. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-17226 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Career_Certifications#Retired_CCIE_tracks Retired CCIE tracks Some previously awarded CCIE specializations have been retired by Cisco. These are: * WAN Switching CCIE (Essentially a specialisation focusing on the IGX/BPX switch products, which had been acquired as part of the StrataComhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StrataCom acquisition) * ISP Dial CCIE * SNA/IP Integration CCIE (aka CCIE Blue) * Design CCIE (NOTE: The CCIE Design and CCDE are completely different design tests in format and subjects examined) People who hold these now-retired certifications can remain CCIEs, provided they continue to take recertification exams. They now hold the title CCIE, rather than CCIE Security, or some other specialization. So if we can get official confirmation that we won't be stripped of CCIE if you pass the voice lab, it might be good, for those of us that have already passed we don't get a chance to change our minds for those that have yet to pass, this might be incentive to change your goal. Bill On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:29 AM, m george m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.commailto:m.george00...@gmail.com wrote: Vik, A 2nd grader can pass RS/Sec/SP much much easier than Voice IE. Voice is still the toughest one i know some double IE's who couldn't pass Voice. If Cisco has lost faith in re-cert, that should apply to every track, not just Voice. Naturally, they should have renamed Certification to Voice/Collaboration or Voice/Video etc introduced new version. If they had to do this retiring thing, why didn't they do when they introduced V3 from V2 ? Old days of Call Manager based on Windows literally everything based on windows, Analog endpoints/VGs/ATAs
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] rtp location start time
I had the pleasure of both proctors at San Jose.. Tong was not as friendly as the new proctor, he name escapes me. But English is not her language and I found it alittle hard to communicate well. But she was very accommodating with the questions that I asked and was very helpful with the answers I got. This was a 180 compared to Tong... All I have to say is make sure you craft you questions well, and you get better response than, do it the way you think is best. Sent from my iPad On May 1, 2013, at 9:12 PM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.commailto:f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote: agreed proctor in SJ is somewhat useless.Does anyone know if proctor in SJ still Tong Ma , I heard they have new proctor and does anyone know what days new proctor manage the lab in SJ? On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.commailto:pav.c...@gmail.com wrote: I second that. Excellent experience at RTP. Wasn't impressed with the proctors at SJC. On May 1, 2013 7:52 PM, STEPHEN FREEBERG sfreeberg...@gmail.commailto:sfreeberg...@gmail.com wrote: RTP exams begin at 7:15 am, You should arrive no later than 7:00 am. David Blair is the proctor and in my opinion is the best proctor I have encountered at Cisco. Steve On May 1, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.camailto:karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote: hi, anyone can share what start time in RTP and proctors there? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] rtp location start time
Sorry I did not ask that question All I know is that they take turns Sent from my iPad On May 1, 2013, at 9:24 PM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.commailto:f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote: what day for new proctor in SJ ? On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: I had the pleasure of both proctors at San Jose.. Tong was not as friendly as the new proctor, he name escapes me. But English is not her language and I found it alittle hard to communicate well. But she was very accommodating with the questions that I asked and was very helpful with the answers I got. This was a 180 compared to Tong... All I have to say is make sure you craft you questions well, and you get better response than, do it the way you think is best. Sent from my iPad On May 1, 2013, at 9:12 PM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.commailto:f.faraday...@gmail.commailto:f.faraday...@gmail.commailto:f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote: agreed proctor in SJ is somewhat useless.Does anyone know if proctor in SJ still Tong Ma , I heard they have new proctor and does anyone know what days new proctor manage the lab in SJ? On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Pavan K pav.c...@gmail.commailto:pav.c...@gmail.commailto:pav.c...@gmail.commailto:pav.c...@gmail.com wrote: I second that. Excellent experience at RTP. Wasn't impressed with the proctors at SJC. On May 1, 2013 7:52 PM, STEPHEN FREEBERG sfreeberg...@gmail.commailto:sfreeberg...@gmail.commailto:sfreeberg...@gmail.commailto:sfreeberg...@gmail.com wrote: RTP exams begin at 7:15 am, You should arrive no later than 7:00 am. David Blair is the proctor and in my opinion is the best proctor I have encountered at Cisco. Steve On May 1, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.camailto:karen.johnson...@yahoo.camailto:karen.johnson...@yahoo.camailto:karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote: hi, anyone can share what start time in RTP and proctors there? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/http://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/http://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/http://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/http://www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab for sale
So after passing my lab, my home lab is sitting idle.. I am located in Canada, if there are any takers feel free to reach out. Cheers Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buying home lab or Waiting for Cisco Live in June
Speaking of buying a lab I am selling mine.. I passed a few weeks ago and it is sitting idle at home.. Email me if you want to chat further.. Sent from my iPad On Apr 28, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Robert Thomas tho...@gmail.commailto:tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm thinking on buying a home lab to start my studies. It would run around 3K investment according to my amazon shopping list. However I'm thinking to wait for June and Cisco Live for announcement about the new version. I don't expect major changes on the setup, perhaps some new phone models like 99XX, or 89XX on the phones. And upgrade to the routers 29XX. However I don't expect major new features from the 29XX roll out on the exam. I would appreciate your opinions on this. -- Robert Thomas Zamora tho...@gmail.commailto:tho...@gmail.com +50689389544 http://cr.linkedin.com/pub/robert-thomas-zamora/29/913/8a8 CCNP, CCNP Voice ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice... I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default And I passed From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru's, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don't want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations
Hmmm I cannot remember but I am 95% sure :) that the fragmentation is not for links over 768... Hence the map-class for the link to Site C is incorrect... remove the frame-relay fragment 960 From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:17 PM To: Abel ...; Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations So my first set of commands below this is NOT using 95% of the BW and the second set of commands, in blue, are using 95% correct? Does this look right? map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 768000 frame-relay bc 7680 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 768000 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! USING ONLY 95% OF BANDWIDTH: map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-201 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/1/0-202 frame-relay cir 729600 frame-relay bc 7296 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay mincir 729600 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust ! ! Regards, Hugo From: Abel ... [mailto:midga...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:47 PM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Barrera, Hugo Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations I used the 95% rule and I passed it too. So, read the requirements word by word. On Apr 9, 2013 5:43 PM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: Here is my take, and take it at face value.. When I took my lab I asked the proctor am I to follow best practices and use the 95% rule for my QOS. Their response was it is not stated to use the 95% and it was my choice... I did not follow the 95% rule and kept it as default And I passed From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 2:09 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS Calculations QoS Guru's, In the real lab I know I have to do some calculations utilizing 95% of the bandwidth...so if there is a link between SA and SB of 384k and SA and SC of 768k is the 95% from these numbers or what the actual interface can do? Also what is a simple straight to the point read on this, I really don't want to review an srnd? Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Can't reach NTP ip address
On your router 3 do a show ntp status and make sure that it is associated Sent from my iPad On Apr 2, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Ben John benjoh...@hotmail.commailto:benjoh...@hotmail.com wrote: Everything is configured right. i can ping from either side. i rebooted the CUE still same thing CUE(config)# CUE(config)# ntp server 142.102.64.254 WARNING!!! Could not reach 142.102.64.254 using NTP. WARNING!!! 142.102.64.254 might not have been configured as WARNING!!! NTP server. WARNING!!! NTP Server 142.102.64.254 Will be entered in the NTP List CUE(config)# 142.1.64.254 142.1.64.254 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. CUE(config)# ntp server 142.1.64.254 WARNING!!! Could not reach 142.1.64.254 using NTP. WARNING!!! 142.1.64.254 might not have been configured as WARNING!!! NTP server. WARNING!!! NTP Server 142.1.64.254 Will be entered in the NTP List CUE(config)# Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 19:01:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Can't reach NTP ip address From: whl...@gmail.commailto:whl...@gmail.com To: benjoh...@hotmail.commailto:benjoh...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Do you have your ip route cue IP 255.255.255.255 service- 0/0 command in? Make sure you can ping the CUE from R1 (I know that sounds wrong but I have been able to ping from CUE and not reverse) if not try rebooting the CUE. I s the NTP service is actually working on R1 from R3 Sometimes if all is configured but just not working, I will reboot the CUE and it will work. At this level it is not the most stable platform (NM or AIM?) On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Ben John benjoh...@hotmail.commailto:benjoh...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi all, i am configuring CUE going thru the initial configuration when i add the NTP server ip address which is my R1 Lo0 CUE comes with a message NTP not reachable i configured ip ospf net p-t-p under the lo0 on both R1 and R3 still. i changed the NTP to R1 voice vlan same thing. i can ping both ip address from CUE see below. any idea what i am missing ? CUE ping 142.1.64.254 PING 142.1.64.254 (142.1.64.254) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 142.1.64.254http://142.1.64.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=50.4 ms 64 bytes from 142.1.64.254http://142.1.64.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=49.1 ms 64 bytes from 142.1.64.254http://142.1.64.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=49.1 ms 64 bytes from 142.1.64.254http://142.1.64.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=49.1 ms 64 bytes from 142.1.64.254http://142.1.64.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=254 time=49.1 ms --- 142.1.64.254 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 200ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.100/49.397/50.439/0.558 ms, ipg/ewma 50.159/49.899 ms CUE CUE ping 142.102.64.254 PING 142.102.64.254 (142.102.64.254) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 142.102.64.254http://142.102.64.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=49.2 ms 64 bytes from 142.102.64.254http://142.102.64.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=49.3 ms 64 bytes from 142.102.64.254http://142.102.64.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=49.2 ms 64 bytes from 142.102.64.254http://142.102.64.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=49.1 ms 64 bytes from 142.102.64.254http://142.102.64.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=254 time=49.2 ms --- 142.102.64.254 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 197ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.112/49.226/49.306/0.251 ms, ipg/ewma 49.336/49.217 ms CUE Ben ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gateway not registering to Gatekeeper
Show the configs... little hard to tell what the issue is... Leslie Meade -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 3:51 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gateway not registering to Gatekeeper Hi, Any idea why my gateway wouldn't register to my gatekeeper, I had all the configs under the SC SVI and basic configs on the SA GK? - Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Presence
It will be stated in the lab which way… but if they do not it is up to you Leslie Meade From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:01 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Presence Hi Guy’s, Question for the seasoned test takers or CCIE’s…regarding CME Presence there appears to be two ways to get the same thing done, shown below. If required to monitor the status of another phone which way would you do it? Way 1: ephone-dn 1 number 1001 description 4001 allow watch ! ! ephone-dn 2 number 1002 description 1002 ! ! ephone 1 device-security-mode none mac-address .. button 1:1 ! ephone 2 device-security-mode none mac-address .. blf-speed-dial 1 4001 label “MONITOR_PH-01″ button 1:2 ! presence presence call-list ! sip-ua presence enable ! Way 2: ! ephone-dn 1 number 1001 description 4001 allow watch ! ! ephone-dn 2 number 1002 description 1002 ! ephone 2 device-security-mode none mac-address .. button 1:2 2w1 Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME-SRST
Have you got a type Ephone 1 Mac address .. Type 7965 Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ivan Darío Sánchez Calderón Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 2:50 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME-SRST Hi, When I configure CME-SRST and I apply an ephone-template to a phone, I reset the phone and when the pone comes back there is no line on the phone, I check the configuration and everithing is fine , the button is associated with the phone, this is a bug? someone knows what is the workaround? Thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate Extension
Easy way of doing this is to copy the hunt pilot and give it another number.. set user caller ID and mask it to Then in the call-manager-fallback change the voicemail to the new hunt pilot and your done Leslie Meade .. Mobile:778.228.4339 | Main: 604.676.5239 Email: leslie.me...@lvs1.commailto:leslie.me...@lvs1.com From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chadi H Hassoune (chassoun) Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:10 PM To: Pixar Perfect; Mark Thrash (marthras); Steve Keller Cc: CCIE Voice OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate Extension Calling Party Xform and assign it to the CUC Device Pool works fine for me. HTH From: Pixar Perfect pixarperf...@live.commailto:pixarperf...@live.com Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:43 PM To: Mark Thrash (marthras) marth...@cisco.commailto:marth...@cisco.com, Steve Keller skeller...@gmail.commailto:skeller...@gmail.com Cc: CCIE Voice OSL ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate Extension the requirement is always for SiteB calling into SiteA voicemail by hitting Messages button. SiteA is always MGCP gateway. Calling Party Xform isnt any use on MGCP gateway for incoming calls. here is another way of doing it ... Voicemail Pilot for CUC is 2200 call-manager-fallback voicemail 2777 --- siteB specific translation-pattern on CUCM to convert 2777 into 2200 and mask calling number . The CSS of the translation pattern should have access to 2200. there is no definitive answer as to which solution is graded positively. there is a reason why many leading CCIE instructors say this is not a test of best practices but a test of how like able is your solution to the script. .. :) From: marth...@cisco.commailto:marth...@cisco.com To: skeller...@gmail.commailto:skeller...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 03:59:48 + CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST to voicemail without Alternate Extension What about a calling party transform mask on the incoming gateway? Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Steve Keller skeller...@gmail.commailto:skeller...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Bill, I like this option pretty well as it seems to limit treatment of calls this way to CUC when site B is in SRST mode only. I will try to lab this up tomorrow morning. Question for you, will this only solve my issue of pressing the VM button to access my mailbox to retrieve a message. Meaning when PSTN calls in to site B phone and then gets forward(redirected) to voicemail, I use a dial-peer that provides RDNIS capabilites to route the caller to the correct mailbox and not the opening greeting. So with this would i still want to use the following to get the caller into my mailbox? dial-peer voice 2600 pots destination-pattern 2600 port 0/0/0:23 no digit-strip prefix 202555 ( assuming no LD code at this site ) this is the way i get callers into my mailbox - using RDNIS. On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:49 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.commailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: If you are told National calls must present a 10D ANI AND you are restricted from using an alternate extension in CUC then I do the following. I am not sure whether this would be graded right or wrong On the SRST device (assume basic SRST) call-manager-fallback max-ephone 10 max-dn 20 oct huntst chan 1 voicemail 912025552699 ! or some unused DID on Site A call-forward noan 912025552600 time 20 !assume VM pilot is 2600 call-forward busy 912025552600 time-z whatever time-f whatever date-f whatever call-forward pattern .T ! do your dial-peer work, as needed On CUCM: Create a PT: hq_gw-in_pt Create a CSS: hq_gw_css Assign CSS to hq gateway Either a.) create a translation in hq_gw-in_pt Pattern: 2699 xform ANI: xform DNIS: 2600! as in, redirect to regular VM pilot CSS: your regular HQ phone CSS will do OR b.) create a new hunt pilot in hq_gw-in_pt Pattern: 2699 HL: your VM HL xform ANI: Why would I go this path? 1. We had a requirement that National calls are presented with a 10D ANI in SRST mode. I assume that you would already have a translation-p that handles this bit 2. We can't modify the CUC subscriber. 3. This method doesn't interfere with RDNIS to VM 4. This method doesn't interfere with direct or redirect calls from HQ or SiteC Anyway, that is my 2 cents. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Bill wrote: Traditionally you would use the alternate extension or a on the pilot. So if you we're denied the ability to use alternate extension for this task but had to use it for another, say allowing
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge on CME Not Working
Did you have an ephone-dn for conference ? ephone-dn 10 oct number 4200 no-reg both conference You need a conference DN for the cbarge to work From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Barrera, Hugo Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:35 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cbarge on CME Not Working Hi Guy's, I was doing a lab yesterday and my Cbarge on CME phones was not working any thoughts on why? I had everything thing configured as far as I can tell... 1. Cbarge in softkey template assigned to ephones 2. privacy set to off under ephones and tel-service 3. sccp configurations to CME and profiles built out 4. sdspfarm commands under tel-service I even saw the conference and transcode register cause of term mon. Regards, Hugo ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm timers
Your best off doing this Sccp ccm group 1 Ass ccm 1 pri 1 Ass ccm 2 pri 2 Ass ccm 3 pri 3 Ass profile 1 reg r3-mtp Ass profile 2 reg r3-conf Ass profile 3 reg r3-xcoder Keepalive retries 1 Keepallive timmer 1 Switchback method immediate Switchback timer 1 Switchover method immediate This will fall over quite fast From: ccie_voice-bounces@onlinestu dylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jamie Parr (jamparr) Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:47 AM To: Barrera, Hugo; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm timers This is for the connection timers to CM from dial-peers, I'm looking for DSP resource timers. I have found several timers under the sccp group; registration, keepalive, connect but none seem to do what I want them to, I'm still getting 3ms timers, debug below sccp_appl_service_start_timer: Start timer type 1 with time_out 3ms Jamie Parr Engineer - IT jamp...@cisco.commailto:jamp...@cisco.com Phone: +44 20 8824 2641 Mobile: +44 7590622049 From: Barrera, Hugo [mailto:hugo.barr...@nexusis.com] Sent: 15 March 2013 16:42 To: Jamie Parr (jamparr); ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: dspfarm timers I think it's with: voice-class h323 1 h225 timeout tcp establish (3) Regards, Hugo From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jamie Parr (jamparr) Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:03 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm timers Hi all When applying access lists and forcing SRST my dsp resources are taking a long time to cycle through the available ccm list in my sccp group. To reach the third choice seems to take forever(haven't timed it), although it does eventually get there. I would like to speed this up, to save me time while testing during the lab; I'm pretty sure we wouldn't get marked down for using the standard timers. Can anyone shed any light on how we reduce the timeout for ccm being inactive? sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 1 priority 1 CM1 associate ccm 2 priority 2 CM2 associate ccm 3 priority 3 SRST-CME associate profile 1 register HQ-xcode associate profile 2 register HQ-conf associate profile 3 register HQ-mtp switchover method immediate switchback method immediate switchback interval 3 Thanks in advance [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo06.jpg] Jamie Parr Engineer - IT jamp...@cisco.commailto:jamp...@cisco.com Phone: +44 20 8824 2641 Mobile: +44 7590622049 Cisco Systems 9-11 New Square Bedfont Lakes Feltham Middlesex TW14 8HA United Kingdom www.cisco.comhttp://cisco.com inline: image001.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VM in SRST
Check to see if you got play tutorial ticked in the cue web pages From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ben John Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:41 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VM in SRST I configured my VM when in SRST when i press the message button it goes to the tutorial instead of asking for the pin. Bellow is my config. Any feedback why it is going to the tutorial ? call-manager-fallback secondary-dialtone 9 max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult timeouts interdigit 3 ip source-address 10.10.65.254 port 2000 max-ephones 9 max-dn 9 octo-line preference 9 no-reg transfer-pattern .T voicemail 2220 huntstop channel 1 call-forward pattern .T call-forward busy 2220 call-forward noan 2220 timeout 20 moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.10.65.254 10.10.110.2 142.102.65.254 142.1.65.254 time-zone 8 time-format 24 dial-peer hunt 2 num-exp 2220 912025552220 Ben ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Questions regarding Unified CME as SRST
Hey Steve, I just ran this via my lab and the light turns on.. If I run debug ccsip messages I see the cue send a mwi notify to the ephone and the light comes on R3(config)# *Feb 21 03:11:56.231: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 10: Name=SEP001BD4607B13 Load= SCCP41.8-4-1S Last=TCP-timeout *Feb 21 03:11:56.279: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER: ephone-2:SEP001BD4607B13 IP:10.69.66.20 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has registered. *Feb 21 03:11:58.615: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 10: Name=SEP0017E066C2E7 Load= SCCP41.8-4-1S Last=TCP-timeout *Feb 21 03:11:58.679: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER: ephone-1:SEP0017E066C2E7 IP:10.69.66.21 Socket:2 DeviceType:Phone has registered. *Feb 21 03:12:15.235: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: NOTIFY sip:4002@10.69.66.254:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.66.253:5060;branch=z9hG4bKyHFdoT6xNYZ85fvOD9z4kQ~~1 Max-Forwards: 70 To: sip:4002@10.69.66.254:5060 From: sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060;tag=ds3be1f82d Call-ID: c234c79-1100@sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Content-Length: 115 Contact: sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060 Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary Event: message-summary Messages-Waiting: yes Message-Account: sip:4002@10.69.66.253 Voice-Message: 1/0 (0/0) Fax-Message: 0/0 (0/0) *Feb 21 03:12:15.243: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.66.253:5060;branch=z9hG4bKyHFdoT6xNYZ85fvOD9z4kQ~~1 From: sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060;tag=ds3be1f82d To: sip:4002@10.69.66.254:5060;tag=3BF3A8-1459 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:12:15 GMt Call-ID: c234c79-1100@sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Content-Length: 0 sip-ua mwi-server ipv4:10.69.66.253 expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp unsolicited ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! telephony-service srst mode auto-provision all srst ephone template 1 srst dn template 1 srst dn line-mode octo max-ephones 30 max-dn 30 no-reg both ip source-address 10.69.66.254 port 2000 time-zone 42 voicemail 4220 mwi relay max-conferences 8 gain -6 transfer-system full-consult transfer-pattern .T secondary-dialtone 9 create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Steve Keller Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:23 PM To: Jason Lee Cc: ccie_voice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Questions regarding Unified CME as SRST Well i confirmed today that if using a CUCM-CUE integration at a branch site, th you will want to setup your MWI to be subscribe/notify when you complete your CUE integratoin with CUCM. MWI works great when registered to CUCM and using CUE for VM. When the site fails over in to srst mode and your phone has an existing MWI on it, this is what you would want to do in order to preserve that MWI lamp. 1) When integrating your CUE to CUCM choose MWI type subscribe/notify. 2) When building your router config for SRST, make sure to build an ephone-dn-template that specifies MWI SIP that will get applied to the phones when they register (under your telephony service). 3) when configuring sip-ua / mwi-server i did not use unsolicited key word this has allowed the current MWI lamp to stay lit when failover to unified CME as SRST. When integrating using unsolicited notificiatoins I was not maintaining the MWI lamp on during failover. i am using 7975 model phones and i bounced the failover a few times and it seemed to work pretty consistently. please try at home and let us know if you have the same results with this if you are interested. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jason Lee jas7...@gmail.commailto:jas7...@gmail.com wrote: I typically use unsolicited on my SRST sites for MWI, but you may be on to something. Maybe this method would be preferred. All depends what they are looking for! Thus begins my tangent ;o) I've seen the same behavior with the + as Bill. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 19, 2013, at 9:55 PM, William Bell b...@ucguerrilla.commailto:b...@ucguerrilla.com wrote: Steve, Jason's response is spot on for your first question. Though, I have found the integration to be a little flaky myself. But that was a recent observation when I was trying pre-build ephone-dns before swinging a site to CME. In regards to your second question, I don't think the phone is display the + on the call plane. But it should display it in the status line at the bottom of the screen. -Bill -- William Bell blog: http://ucguerrilla.com twitter: @ucguerrilla On Feb 19, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Steve Keller wrote: Recently i have noticed a few things in my lab as i have been preparing for the lab exam. Using CME as SRST specifically in this situation, i have been trying to preserve as much features and appearance as i can when my UCM phones register to the gateway. Two scenarios i have question on because i cannot seem to get them to work. 1) If my branch 2 phone has a voicemail and MWI turned on, when it falls back to Unified CME as SRST the MWI does
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off
Plus, I still think that they will stop marking as soon as they know you won't pass. Sp parts you know you nailed, you will see a zero Sent from my iPad On Oct 31, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.commailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote: Cory, Technically speaking, the grading has to be evaluated by taking the seating position where we took the exam rather doing it remotely for their convenience. i used switchport mode trunk, switchport trunk native vlan data on sb and sc. Can anyone expect fail in the exam after evaluating the tasks thrice and check everything line by line, and the end showing the score report as fail... This is completely insane. I was wondering if i can legally proceed so that justification will be done for the right candidates. Thank you krishna. From: Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.commailto:corygray22...@hotmail.com To: 'Krishna' vinayak_...@yahoo.commailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com; 'Online Study' ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 7:41 AM Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off Krishna, I am sorry to hear that. I suffered something similar during my last attempt but after much thinking I think I know what happened and maybe the same happened to you. Even though IPexpert recommends using switchport mode trunk on ESW interfaces I still had been using switch mode access because it never failed. I also did this because using switchport mode trunk would show nothing in the show vlan-switch command so I was scared this was how it was being graded and would miss the points. IPexpert recommends this because they say the other way has been known to stop working for no reason. When I got my score report the next day, I could see several sections wrong that I knew I configured right. Doing the math I believe when they went to grade my exam the next day that my CUCME phones were no longer registered. I will use switchport mode trunk for now on. What did you do? That is my only theory. Maybe you have one different that can help others if you choose not to take it again. I will be back 11/30 and am hoping to do as well as I did last time but pass :) Thanks, Cory From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Krishna Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:08 AM To: Online Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off all, yesterday i took my second attempt in rtp, and i am 200 % sure that i pass the exam. I got 1 hour left even after testing it thrice, but looking at the score report i was shocked, and i completely disagree with my score report. F... CCIE lab script evaluation.. i am completely pissed off the way it showed the results... no more CCIE in my life... i appreciate all my friends who helped me in this journey. thank you krishna. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off
I seem to remember that someone has been down this path and it did not end well. They touted the we do not do remarks blah blah... But I hope you get a better response Sent from Samsung Mobile Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote: Marko, i opened case with support, and i hope i will get some good feedback . I appreciate your help. thank you krishna. From: Marko Milivojevic mar...@ipexpert.com To: Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.com Cc: Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.com; Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off Krishna, You can always open a case with the certification support and state your reasons. While there is no regrade for the voice lab, Cisco has in the past issued retake vouchers for people who have been wronged by the grading... if it was indeed the grading issue. -- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP RS) Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.commailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote: Cory, Technically speaking, the grading has to be evaluated by taking the seating position where we took the exam rather doing it remotely for their convenience. i used switchport mode trunk, switchport trunk native vlan data on sb and sc. Can anyone expect fail in the exam after evaluating the tasks thrice and check everything line by line, and the end showing the score report as fail... This is completely insane. I was wondering if i can legally proceed so that justification will be done for the right candidates. Thank you krishna. From: Cory Gray corygray22...@hotmail.commailto:corygray22...@hotmail.com To: 'Krishna' vinayak_...@yahoo.commailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com; 'Online Study' ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 7:41 AM Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off Krishna, I am sorry to hear that. I suffered something similar during my last attempt but after much thinking I think I know what happened and maybe the same happened to you. Even though IPexpert recommends using switchport mode trunk on ESW interfaces I still had been using switch mode access because it never failed. I also did this because using switchport mode trunk would show nothing in the show vlan-switch command so I was scared this was how it was being graded and would miss the points. IPexpert recommends this because they say the other way has been known to stop working for no reason. When I got my score report the next day, I could see several sections wrong that I knew I configured right. Doing the math I believe when they went to grade my exam the next day that my CUCME phones were no longer registered. I will use switchport mode trunk for now on. What did you do? That is my only theory. Maybe you have one different that can help others if you choose not to take it again. I will be back 11/30 and am hoping to do as well as I did last time but pass J Thanks, Cory From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.commailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Krishna Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:08 AM To: Online Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco ripped me off all, yesterday i took my second attempt in rtp, and i am 200 % sure that i pass the exam. I got 1 hour left even after testing it thrice, but looking at the score report i was shocked, and i completely disagree with my score report. F... CCIE lab script evaluation.. i am completely pissed off the way it showed the results... no more CCIE in my life... i appreciate all my friends who helped me in this journey. thank you krishna. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Written expiration question
As far as I know... If you take one lab a year then your golden on you written Leslie From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Randall Crumm Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:20 AM To: Online Study Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Written expiration question Hi, I have a question about my written CCIE test. I understand you have to take your first lab attempt within 18 months and the next one 12 months afterwards. I have done that. My question is there a cap at 3 years where no matter how many times I have taken the lab, do I need to take the written again or does the written get extended for another 12 months? Also does anyone know an email or contact person I can ask at Cisco. Have a great day! Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] setup for mgcp pri monitoring
you will also have to take in to account that you have to also do this in failover as well. two servers mean two different mgcp pri monitors Sent from my iPad On 2012-07-07, at 10:24 PM, Krishna vinayak_...@yahoo.commailto:vinayak_...@yahoo.com wrote: hi folks, i do remember some member asking for monitor status of mgcp pri when it is in the state of TEI 0 changed to down... here are the detail steps: 1.) open the RTMT Tool, right click on the performace under performance section 2.) under cluster, choose the call manager to which mgcp is registered 3.) extend the call-manager section by a one click on the call-manager IP address 4.) Choose the CISCO MGCP PRI DEVICE 5.) select DataLinkInService tab, then right click on this tab and select the counter instances 6.)on the Right pane of the window, the performance monitor appears 7.)on performance monitor, select and right click which gives the option of set Alert/properties 8.) under Set alert/properties a.) select the severity type b.)define threshold value, in this case check under tab with value 1 since 0 is down , 1 value is UP C.)frequency setup for monitoring d.) check enable email, click on the configure tab, add a new alert action . 9.)under serial interface issue no isdn bind-l3 ccm-mana or shutdown the interface which automatically brings the D channel out of service... Note: TEI Assigned is nothing but D-channel is not active, and therefore it would meet the requirement for the alert action please correct me if i am missing something or my approach is incorrect.. thank you krishna. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.comhttp://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN issues
I have a strange issue that I think I know the issue but do not know how to fix it. I have a test lab and today I fired up my PSTN router a 3745, and for the past year it was worked with out an issue. But today i am getting the phone hanging at requesting Softkey Template then it will cycle through again There has been no changes to the router. When i do a debug tftp events i get the following Jun 7 21:35:57.695: New Skinny socket accepted [1] (1 active) Jun 7 21:35:57.695: sin_family 2, sin_port 50667, in_addr 10.10.200.21 Jun 7 21:35:57.695: skinny_add_socket 1 10.10.200.21 50667 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 17: Name=SEP0014F26A78CA Load=8.0(9.0) Last=KeepaliveTO Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-(3)[2] StationRegisterMessage (1/1/5) from 10.10.200.21 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-(3)[2] Register StationIdentifier DeviceName SEP0014F26A78CA Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-(3)[2] StationIdentifier Instance 1deviceType 7 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1]:stationIpAddr 10.10.200.21 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:maxStreams 0 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:From Phone raw protocol Ver 0x856B Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:protocol Ver 0x856B Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:phone-size 5480 dn-size 688 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-(3) Allow any Skinny Server IP address 10.10.250.2 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:Found entry 2 for 0014F26A78CA Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:socket change 1 to 2 Jun 7 21:35:57.703: ephone-3[1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:DisAssociate: Closed socket 1 while REGISTERED Jun 7 21:35:57.707: %IPPHONE-6-UNREGISTER_ABNORMAL: ephone-3:SEP0014F26A78CA IP:10.10.200.21 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has unregistered abnormally. Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[-1][SEP0014F26A78CA]:FAILED: CLOSED old socket -1 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:***Force device subtype to 0 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:phone SEP0014F26A78CA re-associate OK on socket [2] Jun 7 21:35:57.707: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER: ephone-3:SEP0014F26A78CA IP:10.10.200.21 Socket:2 DeviceType:Phone has registered. Jun 7 21:35:57.707: Phone 2 socket 2 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: Skinny Local IP address = 10.10.250.2 on port 2000 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: Skinny Phone IP address = 10.10.200.21 50667 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:Signal protocol ver 8 to phone with ver 11 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:Date Format M/D/Y Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[2]:RegisterAck sent to sockettype ephone socket 2: keepalive period 30 use sccp-version 8 Jun 7 21:35:57.707: ephone-3[2]:CapabilitiesReq sent Jun 7 21:35:57.715: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.715: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.719: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.755: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.759: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:CapabilitiesRes received Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:Caps list 8 WideBand_256K 120 ms G711Ulaw64k 40 ms G711Alaw64k 40 ms G729AnnexB 60 ms G729AnnexAwAnnexB 60 ms G729 60 ms G729AnnexA 60 ms Unrecognized Media Type 257 4 ms Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:MediaPathEventMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:ButtonTemplateReqMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:StationButtonTemplateReqMessage set max presentation to 6 Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:CheckAutoReg Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:AutoReg is disabled Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:Setting 6 lines 0 speed-dials on phone (max_line 6) Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:First Speed Dial Button location is 0 (0) Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2][SEP0014F26A78CA]:Configured 0 speed dial buttons Jun 7 21:35:57.919: ephone-3[2]:ButtonTemplate lines=6 speed=0 buttons=6 offset=0 Jun 7 21:35:57.927: ephone-3[2]:StationSoftKeyTemplateReqMessage Jun 7 21:35:57.927: ephone-3[2]:StationSoftKeyTemplateResMessage -- This is where the Requesting Softkey Template hangs Jun 7 21:35:58.115: Bring up DN 1 by SkinnyCheckDnStatus Jun 7 21:35:58.591: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault7960.cnf.xml, time 00:00:25 for process 154 Jun 7 21:35:59.115: Bring up DN 2 by SkinnyCheckDnStatus Jun 7 21:36:00.115: Bring up DN 3 by SkinnyCheckDnStatus Jun 7 21:36:01.115: Bring up DN 4 by SkinnyCheckDnStatus Jun 7 21:36:02.115: Bring up DN 5 by SkinnyCheckDnStatus Jun 7 21:36:02.623: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault7960.cnf.xml, time 00:00:25 for process 156 Jun 7 21:36:03.115: Bring up DN 6 by SkinnyCheckDnStatus Jun 7 21:36:06.619: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault7960.cnf.xml, time 00:00:25 for process 171 Jun 7 21:36:07.115: ephone-3[2]:SkinnyCompleteRegistration Jun 7 21:36:10.619: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault7960.cnf.xml, time 00:00:25 for
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice new Version
Hmmm, I have not seen anything to say that they are going to change it.. Althou it is getting long in the tooth From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ken Wyan Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 8:56 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice new Version Hi, Many people are talking about a new blueprint for CCIE Voice Lab ( should be v4). Did cisco officially announce a syllabus change for CCIE Voice Lab? Ken ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Sip gatekeeper
I am trying to work out my problem here. While I have no problems getting my sccp and sip (@g728r8) working across the gatekeeper, As soon as I hard encode the codec to g711u on the voice register pool, the phone will ring and I get dead air. So the fix would e set a transcoder up on the cme to transcode to g728r8. I have done this and the transcoder is up. I have tired with and with out a mtp on the trunk and still get the same results. Any ideas Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Sip gatekeeper
The transcoder is on the cme Sent from my iPad On 2012-05-23, at 3:42 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: Where is the g711 being transcoded at the cme or GK? On 5/23/12 12:46 AM, Leslie Meade leslie.me...@lvs1.com wrote: I am trying to work out my problem here. While I have no problems getting my sccp and sip (@g728r8) working across the gatekeeper, As soon as I hard encode the codec to g711u on the voice register pool, the phone will ring and I get dead air. So the fix would e set a transcoder up on the cme to transcode to g728r8. I have done this and the transcoder is up. I have tired with and with out a mtp on the trunk and still get the same results. Any ideas Sent from my iPad ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX scripts
Also if you brought the labs the cud script should be there. Besides that you can always write it out :) On Feb 5, 2012 8:48 AM, Ken Wyan kew...@gmail.com wrote: That's illegal. share one directory of your computer copy from UCCX server to shared directory. On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: HI, How can I copy the icd script to my computer from the proctor labs pod? Thanks, Cheers, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] study partners
I am after a study partner on the West cost of US.. I have my own rack and I mean my own routers etc :P Any takes out there ? Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Five Labs: UCCX Question
FYI the final DSG (Lab 5 ) is now up :) From: Chris Martin clm.c...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:46:06 -0600 To: datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Five Labs: UCCX Question So this is from memory and not something I have done more than once or twice. If I recall you have to set the enterprise data into a parameter within your script, then launch the desktop administrator and have it pull in that field. (http://xx.xx.xx.xx:6293/teamadmin/login.cda), from there you can pull that enterprise data. Now at this point it is sketchy and I remember even in class we had some issues getting it to work. HTH, Chris On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:28 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot understand, how the Agent (IPPA or CAD) can show manually configured Varibales values, until the call comes to Agents phone. You can use the Get Reporting Statistics Step to gather info about the Queue - But I do not know, how to pass that variables to Agents layout in real time - the call did not get to agents yet, so how that parameter is dynamically updated on Agents screen? On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:12 PM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: In lab 1 of the new 5 labs, question 7.3 it asks that the agent be able to see the ani and number of calls in queue. The DSG says to add a ³salesinq² field to the default layout. The problem is that there is nothing telling IPPA what to populate this field with. So in my lab I see the following when I press CDATA. ANI: 4678124 callsinq: But the DSG is showing callsinq: 1. There must be a step missing from the DSG. How do we populate the callsinq field? John ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not find an IPIPGW
and do you have at least one h323 dial-peer on the HQ router Leslie Meade - Original Message - From: Boris boris.k...@gmail.com To: Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net Cc: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:19:21 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper VIAZONE - Could not find an IPIPGW Hi Steve, Do you have This in your config? Voice service voip Allow h323 to h323 If not, add it and do no gateway/gateway Your cube should appear as H323 type in show gatek end. Sent from my mobile device, sorry for typos. --- Regards Boris On 18/01/2012, at 7:22, Steven forum.ccie.onlinestudyl...@nocer.net wrote: Hi there, i got some problems with my viazone (CUBE) at HQ-RTR. I already checked the Tech prefix match and it seems to succeed. But i'm clueless how to debug/resolve the Could not find an IPIPGW-problem. I also checked the dial-peers on HQ-RTR. Any help appreciated. Regards, Steven ! *** Begin tech details: HQ-RTR#debug gatekeeper main 10! tried to call from HQ (5002) to BR2 (3006) Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x48F0C08C,crv=0x7, answerCall=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/gk_dns_query: No Name servers Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (3006) Tech-prefix match failed. Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (3006) Matched zone prefix 3 and remainder 006 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default ingress network = 1 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the source side, src_zonep=0x4793079C Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is UCM, and z_invianamelen=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the destination side, dst_zonep=0x47930A08 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is UCME, and z_outvianamelen=4 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone and z_outvianamep=CUBE Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: Received ARQ for a zone (UCME) that has an outviazone (CUBE) specified. Pick an IP-IP gateway in that viazone. Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: zonep: 0x47930C74, tpp: 0x0, current_endpt: 0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Selecting any IPIPGW. qelemp.head=0x46F0FE88, use_count=1, current_endpt=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: qelemp=0x46F0FE88, loop_count=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Examining tgwp 0x46F253E0, g_supp_prots: 0x50 qelemp: 0x46F0FE88, loop_count: 1 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Searched through the entire gateway list. loop_count=0 Jan 17 19:56:37.786: ////GK/gk_gw_select_ipipgw_random: Could not find an IPIPGW. Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo(3006): Viazone gateway selection failed for zone CUBE Jan 17 19:56:37.786: //80AC69450700/80AC69450700/GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: rassrv_get_addrinfo() failed (return code = 0x805) HQ-RTR#show gatekeeper gw-type-prefix GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone CUBE master gateway list: 10.10.110.1:1720 HQ-RTR Zone UCM master gateway list: 10.10.210.10:44248 gk-trunk_1 10.10.210.11:36641 gk-trunk_2 Prefix: 3#* Zone UCME master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR HQ-RTR#show gatekeeper zone prefix ZONE PREFIX TABLE = GK-NAME E164-PREFIX --- --- UCME 3... UCM 5... HQ-RTR#show running-config interface loopback 0 interface Loopback0 ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-RTR h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1# HQ-RTR#show running-config | section gatekeeper gatekeeper zone local UCM ipexpert.com zone local UCME ipexpert.com outvia CUBE zone local CUBE ipexpert.com zone prefix UCME 3... zone prefix UCM 5... gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology no shutdown ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Five New Lab from IPExpert
you got the last proctor guide for 5? I still only see up to 4 - Original Message - From: Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com To: John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 8:03:02 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Five New Lab from IPExpert Hi I have the new five labs and I think they are much better. They have alot of new things and really good explanations. I tho k they are worth the money HTH Randall Sent from my iPhone On Jan 15, 2012, at 6:53 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) jomcg...@cisco.com wrote: Has anyone purchased the five new labs from IPExpert? If so, are they worth money? What’s different about them versus the 10 lab workbook? Anything new or just more of the same? John blockquote ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com /blockquote ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 7 ---uccx script
Put the following at the start of the holiday script triger = get trigger info (type) if trigger == (Cisco JTAPI Trigger)then true accecpt call This will allow you to make an applcation of the Holiday script and debug it that way Leslie Meade Salient Service 760.930.2636 , supp...@salientnetworks.com Request Line (moves adds and changes only) 760.930.2699 , m...@salientnetworks.com - Original Message - From: donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com To: ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 5:49:32 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 7 ---uccx script hi, anyone know how to debug UCCX script for lab 7 WB 2. There is Sub Flow Holiday. When I run the Reactive Debug , it did not go to Holiday child script. Does anyone know how to get to the child flow ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cos maping to dscp question
When setting qos on a phone port, to trust dscp only. Is it necessary to change the mls qos commands for cos ? For example you are asked to trust DSCP values from a cisco phone and only place signalling traffic into Queue 2 Threshold 3, no other values are allowed. Lab 8 5.4 Why change the mls qos err-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3, if we are told not to trust it ? Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Possible issue with opening PDF's today ?
Is it me or we experiencing issues opening the secure PDF's today. I have tried multiple machines and I am getting a blank document. ( I have open file installed). The PDF's open just fine last night. Infact I had one open up on another machine and closed to make sure. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QOS
I know about the bug that talks about when doing MLP LFI it can bring down the link. Generaly on my home lab when this happens i just do a wr mem and reboot, and the link comes back after a reboot. However I am working on Proctorlabs and this seams not to wok. And when I reload the router with the default config and do it again the link goes down and then back up for about 3 mins and then drops... Is there something i am missing ? I did see an error when I was putting changing the qos policy-map in the int, the router rebooted and it happend again 3 more times... BR1-RTR(config)#interface Virtual-Template200 BR1-RTR(config-if)# bandwidth 384 BR1-RTR(config-if)# ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 BR1-RTR(config-if)# ppp multilink BR1-RTR(config-if)# ppp multilink interleave BR1-RTR(config-if)# ppp multilink fragment delay 10 BR1-RTR(config-if)# service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-UnTrust BR1-RTR(config-if)#! BR1-RTR(config-if)#no service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-UnTrust %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 23:50:00 UTC Sat Mar 26 2011 addr=0x40, pc=0x42DC1084 , ra=0x42DC5690 , sp=0x49C9B0E8 %ALIGN-1-FATAL: Illegal access to a low address 23:50:00 UTC Sat Mar 26 2011 addr=0x40, pc=0x42DC1084 , ra=0x42DC5690 , sp=0x49C9B0E8 23:50:01 UTC Sat Mar 26 2011: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x42DC1084 Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, show tech and contact Cisco Technical Support. -Traceback= 0x42DC1084 0x42DC5690 0x4277A900 0x4277B7F4 0x4277BE24 0x4277BEB8 $0 : , AT : 46DC, v0 : 0001, v1 : a0 : 0001, a1 : 0001, a2 : 48B414BC, a3 : 49C9B420 t0 : , t1 : 0018, t2 : , t3 : t4 : 49C9B100, t5 : 0004, t6 : 0006, t7 : 0050 s0 : , s1 : , s2 : , s3 : s4 : , s5 : , s6 : 48B41444, s7 : 0001 t8 : 0141, t9 : , k0 : 47194000, k1 : 0018 gp : 46DC4A60, sp : 49C9B0E8, s8 : 0001, ra : 42DC5690 EPC : 42DC1084, ErrorEPC : A8516405, SREG : 3400E103 MDLO : 00014800, MDHI : , BadVaddr : 0040 DATA_START : 0x440C9040 Cause 080C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception Writing crashinfo to flash:crashinfo_20110326-235001 23:50:01 UTC Sat Mar 26 2011: TLB (store) exception, CPU signal 10, PC = 0x42DC1084 Possible software fault. Upon reccurence, please collect crashinfo, show tech and contact Cisco Technical Support. -Traceback= 0x42DC1084 0x42DC5690 0x4277A900 0x4277B7F4 0x4277BE24 0x4277BEB8 $0 : , AT : 46DC, v0 : 0001, v1 : a0 : 0001, a1 : 0001, a2 : 48B414BC, a3 : 49C9B420 t0 : , t1 : 0018, t2 : , t3 : t4 : 49C9B100, t5 : 0004, t6 : 0006, t7 : 0050 s0 : , s1 : , s2 : , s3 : s4 : , s5 : , s6 : 48B41444, s7 : 0001 t8 : 0141, t9 : , k0 : 47194000, k1 : 0018 gp : 46DC4A60, sp : 49C9B0E8, s8 : 0001, ra : 42DC5690 EPC : 42DC1084, ErrorEPC : A8516405, SREG : 3400E103 MDLO : 00014800, MDHI : , BadVaddr : 0040 DATA_START : 0x440C9040 Cause 080C (Code 0x3): TLB (store) exception -Traceback= 0x42DC1084 0x42DC5690 0x4277A900 0x4277B7F4 0x4277BE24 0x4277BEB8 === Flushing messages (23:50:01 UTC Sat Mar 26 2011) === ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme to ccm via gatekeeper
It is some type of codec/mtp issue, i think. If i change the voip dialpeer to include codec g711ulaw on the CME the call can be put on hold, and recover the rtp stream. (I can hear the other side again) If I remove the codec from the voip dial-peer, the codec is G729r8 all the way though and the phone on the ccm can put the call on hold. But when i press resume I can not hear the other side. I have a MTP assigned to the HQ device pool and also to the GK. I have blown everything away and i have got the same thing again. -Original Message- From: Brian Mulgrew [mailto:btmulg...@gmail.com] Sent: Tue 3/15/2011 4:29 AM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme to ccm via gatekeeper Hi Leslie - is h245tcs unchecked on the CUCM gk trunk? hth Brian On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca wrote: I have gotten cube setup and everything works as planned call goes via the cube and I have a software mtp for placing calls on hold. If I dial 5xxx or 1xxx from the cme I am able to compleat the call via the gatekeeper but when a ccm phone puts them in hold I get dead air, The cme gets tone for moh. But I am not able to hear anything when I resume the call. If I place the same ccm call on hold at the cme site and resume it, i am able to hear the call again. Any ideas? Sent from my iPhone ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cme to ccm via gatekeeper
I have gotten cube setup and everything works as planned call goes via the cube and I have a software mtp for placing calls on hold. If I dial 5xxx or 1xxx from the cme I am able to compleat the call via the gatekeeper but when a ccm phone puts them in hold I get dead air, The cme gets tone for moh. But I am not able to hear anything when I resume the call. If I place the same ccm call on hold at the cme site and resume it, i am able to hear the call again. Any ideas? Sent from my iPhone ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5 day exam course
Anyone going this month to this in Columbus and would like to share a cab, or can give me a lift from the airport ? If so pls contact me off list Cheers Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Route list unregistered
When I make a new Route list, it will not become registered. Any idea what causes this to happen ? When I remove the gateway from the route group, and add it to the route pattern the call completes. I think i may have a bad image.. can any one tell me where to start to look to prove, to my self that it is indeed a bad image or other wise . When I reboot the server the route list comes registered but it will become unregistered. Cheers Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] is the site down ?
Page is not coming up and the authenticaton server for PDF's is not speaking to me ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3
The previous question is this, The gw-type-prefix table on the gatekeeper should be as shown- only the items in bold are important HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gatekeeper gw buffer used: 510, size: 20480 GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone UCM master gateway list: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCME master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR So buy my guess this breaks the above requirement ? HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gatekeeper gw buffer used: 510, size: 20480 GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone UCM master gateway list: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCM prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCM prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCME master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR From: Shrini [mailto:linuxbos...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:38 AM To: Leslie Meade; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3 Hi Leslie, As per the zone prefix 1... the display is correct and any calls matching prefix 1... will got to gk-trunk_2 on top priority. What is the previous question which must not be invalidate ? -Shrini From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Leslie Meade Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 9:15 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3 I have got this working but the display is not what it should be I have the zone prefix 1... gw-prioity 10 gk-trunk_2 commands in but when I do a sh gatekeeper gw I see them in the output. The question says it must not invalidate the previous question. So am I wrong ? HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gatekeeper gw buffer used: 510, size: 20480 GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone UCM master gateway list: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCM prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCM prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCME master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3
I have got this working but the display is not what it should be I have the zone prefix 1... gw-prioity 10 gk-trunk_2 commands in but when I do a sh gatekeeper gw I see them in the output. The question says it must not invalidate the previous question. So am I wrong ? HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gatekeeper gw buffer used: 510, size: 20480 GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default gateway-technology) Zone UCM master gateway list: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCM prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCM prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 10: 10.10.200.20:53373 gk-trunk_2 Priority 9: 10.10.200.10:47991 gk-trunk_1 Zone UCME master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] sh gatekeeper calls question
Can anyone off the top of their heads tell me why I get this line when I do a sh gatekeeper calls HQ-RTR#sh gatekeeper calls Total number of active calls = 1. largest hash bucket = 1 GATEKEEPER CALL INFO LocalCallIDAge(secs) BW 2-165 41418 16(Kbps) ConferenceID CallID SrcCRV 0091A4A5 53F9B1D0 01000202 0A014632 0091A4A5 53F9B1D0 01000202 0A014632 1 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr src EP: gk-trunk_25002 CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port 10.10.200.201720 10.10.200.2033456 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr dst EP: BR2-RTR 3003 CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port 10.10.110.3 1720 10.10.110.3 53469 callstate: SEP, DEP, HQ-RTR#sh debug Gatekeeper: gk main debug level = 10 (filter is OFF) Cheers ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] volume 2 lab 7
General question.. considering we should only do what is stated in the lab doco, would you setup long distance dialling ? Lab7 only has 911, local and teho Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update
So if i am trying to stop H323 sending back the local clid we put this command in voice services voip no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update but the callmanager phone is still revicing the local clid for the caller display. Am I missing something here ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question
I have been looking at the WAN FRF.12 configs and I do not understand something. In all the examples the following has been advised. FRF.12 ( average values) Layer 2 7 bytes Layer 3 2 bytes Media 20 bytes 29 * .008 * 50 = 11.6 Why in this lab it is different FRF.12 Layer 2 8 bytes Layer 3 40 bytes à ?? Media 20 bytes 68* .008 * 50 = 27.2 I might be missing something but, I do not fully understand where the 40 bytes come into play. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question
Ok given that that's the reason, why is it not included in previous examples ? For example, I have seen this example given lots of times Ip/udp/rtp 2 bytes /packet From: linuxboss.9 [mailto:linuxbos...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:53 AM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question RTP + UDP headers = 40 bytes On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca wrote: I have been looking at the WAN FRF.12 configs and I do not understand something. In all the examples the following has been advised. FRF.12 ( average values) Layer 2 7 bytes Layer 3 2 bytes Media 20 bytes 29 * .008 * 50 = 11.6 Why in this lab it is different FRF.12 Layer 2 8 bytes Layer 3 40 bytes à ?? Media 20 bytes 68* .008 * 50 = 27.2 I might be missing something but, I do not fully understand where the 40 bytes come into play. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 47
Dam I am an idoit... I did not read the question.. no compression needed -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:58 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 47 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. lab 6 QOS question (Leslie Meade) 2. Re: lab 6 QOS question (linuxboss.9) 3. Re: lab 6 QOS question (Leslie Meade) 4. Re: SIP Phones in CME (CCIE Voice GMAIL) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:50:11 -0700 From: Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question Message-ID: 65be43a9da05cd44a3a72b458a7c0c5917e...@exch-mg.mgvfs.mcleannet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I have been looking at the WAN FRF.12 configs and I do not understand something. In all the examples the following has been advised. FRF.12 ( average values) Layer 2 7 bytes Layer 3 2 bytes Media 20 bytes 29 * .008 * 50 = 11.6 Why in this lab it is different FRF.12 Layer 2 8 bytes Layer 3 40 bytes ? ?? Media 20 bytes 68* .008 * 50 = 27.2 I might be missing something but, I do not fully understand where the 40 bytes come into play. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101004/0ad84d56/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:52:43 -0700 From: linuxboss.9 linuxbos...@gmail.com To: Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question Message-ID: aanlktinrddbwodk-bgp3g-g5yxsrprj4dqpesojk1...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 RTP + UDP headers = 40 bytes On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca wrote: I have been looking at the WAN FRF.12 configs and I do not understand something. In all the examples the following has been advised. FRF.12 ( average values) Layer 2 7 bytes Layer 3 2 bytes Media 20 bytes 29 * .008 * 50 = 11.6 Why in this lab it is different FRF.12 Layer 2 8 bytes Layer 3 40 bytes ? ?? Media 20 bytes 68* .008 * 50 = 27.2 I might be missing something but, I do not fully understand where the 40 bytes come into play. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101004/c8772396/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 09:57:26 -0700 From: Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca To: linuxboss.9 linuxbos...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question Message-ID: 65be43a9da05cd44a3a72b458a7c0c5917e...@exch-mg.mgvfs.mcleannet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Ok given that that's the reason, why is it not included in previous examples ? For example, I have seen this example given lots of times Ip/udp/rtp 2 bytes /packet From: linuxboss.9 [mailto:linuxbos...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:53 AM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 6 QOS question RTP + UDP headers = 40 bytes On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca wrote: I have been looking at the WAN FRF.12 configs and I do not understand something. In all the examples the following has been advised. FRF.12 ( average values) Layer 2 7 bytes Layer 3 2 bytes Media 20 bytes 29 * .008 * 50 = 11.6 Why in this lab it is different FRF.12 Layer 2 8 bytes Layer 3 40 bytes ? ?? Media 20 bytes 68* .008 * 50 = 27.2 I might be missing something but, I do not fully understand where the 40 bytes come into play
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR CUE no greeting/voice
I am working on lab 7 and trying to get AAR setup. As far as I can tell it is working. But when I reduce the location to a low level, the call reroutes out the pstn and I see it come into br2 hits the correct dial-peer, the debug ccsip tells me 200 ok, but I hear dead space. Wait 30secs and the run though the dail-peers again and reconnects back to CUE.. Any ideas If I set locations back to normal it all functions as planned.. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 55, Issue 53
It is an application from a company called voip intergration. It is not em emulator it take screen shots from a real phone Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:36 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: UCCX 7.0(1) Error - Cannot connect to theIPPhone Agent service (Amit Batra) 2. SCCP Softphone (Ilya Rubinchik) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:41:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Amit Batra batraji...@yahoo.com To: Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX 7.0(1) Error - Cannot connect to theIPPhone Agent service Message-ID: 296490.46548...@web110516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Tam I got the original Uccx installation media from my work. I converted into iso and uploaded on my vmware.. I didn't download it from anywhere.. Regards Amit Sent from my iPhone On 14/09/2010, at 2:58 AM, Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Amit, It's great to hear that you have a uccx vmware running. Do you have any issue with IPPA login with single button? If you have it setup and ready, then please try to login from the phone and then go to uccx server and open the IPPClientxxx.log (the latest one), in C:\Progra~1\wfavvid\tomcat_appadmin\logs folder, and see if you have any error; if not, then please paste the last output of the log. I believed that I have a corrupted vmware image, so I am still searching for another vmware image. If you still remember where you get your vmware image from, that would help also. Thanks. TN. -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:35:20 + From: Ilya Rubinchik ilya.rubinc...@followmars.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SCCP Softphone Message-ID: 53570d63f48a224b910f4ca40f5b7427037a0...@mars2.followmars.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, people! In video clip for Task 2.1 of Volume 2 Lab 1, I saw Vik used some kind of 7962 emulation software, that is looks not like CIPC or IP Blue. It looks much like CIPC, but he was able run two instances of this program simultaneously. Which kind of software is this, and how to get it for my studies? Thanks! -- Best regards, Ilya Rubinchik Chief UC Engineer Mars Solutions Ltd. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100914/edb01a4f/attachment.html -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: screenshot.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 51426 bytes Desc: screenshot.jpg URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100914/edb01a4f/attachment.jpg -- ___ CCIE_Voice mailing list CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 55, Issue 53 ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] extension Mobility
Can you have the same number both as an extension mobility number as well as a normal number on a phone ? I get the user logged into mobility but when they try to log out I get please enter the admin password, instead of a logout button . Cheers Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] extension Mobility
I found it... I needed to put the EM service into the subscribe/unsubscribe section on the device profile. Once I put that i got the logout button It was asking me for the admin username and pin.. Cheers -Original Message- From: groganhockey [mailto:groganhoc...@gmail.com] Sent: Wed 9/8/2010 7:53 PM To: Leslie Meade Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] extension Mobility Yes, you can. They will show up and act as a shared line. Is the system prompting you for a PIN, or what specifically? mike On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca wrote: Can you have the same number both as an extension mobility number as well as a normal number on a phone ? I get the user logged into mobility but when they try to log out I get please enter the admin password, instead of a logout button . Cheers Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Study partner in Vancouver area ??
Is anyone else in the Vancouver area, looking for a study monkey ? Leslie Meade ccna ccvp Network Administrator lme...@signal.ca mailto:lme...@signal.ca IP Phone :604-453-5076 Mobile :778-228-4339 Fax :604-453-5051 Building C - 3500 Cornett Road Vancouver, BC V5M 2H5 Canada www.signal.ca http://www.signal.ca/ http://www.signal.ca/ This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. P Please consider the environment before printing this email. image001.jpgimage002.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA issue
I know that general support is not the best option here. But I will ask.. I just noticed that my MVA is not working. Users can log into the system and attempt to dial, but the then get dead air Debugs show that some where I am appending an extra 7 to the remote destination profile, but I do not understand where. I am not using any transformation patterns, the gateway is not adding any digits.. The debug from vxml app on the gateway is showing correct numbers, debug ccapi is also showing correct, it is something on the Callmanager that is doing this. How can I track down what is adding the 7 ? 05/25/2010 20:09:57.870 CCM|SPROC :: stripAndPrependDigits- The number 777 is prepended with prefix 7, updated number=82284339|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::CCM7-01LVL::Detaile dMASK::ff 05/25/2010 20:09:57.870 CCM|SPROC getCtrlPid - callingNum=, inputCtrlPid=(1,100,175,1)|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::x.x.x.xLVL:: DetailedMASK::0800 05/25/2010 20:09:57.870 CCM|DbMobility: getMatchedRemDest starts: cnumber = |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID:: x.x.x.x LVL::DetailedMASK::ff 05/25/2010 20:09:57.870 CCM|DbMobility: getMatchedRemDest: full match case|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID:: x.x.x.x LVL::DetailedMASK::ff 05/25/2010 20:09:57.870 CCM|DbMobility: can't find remdest in map|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::CCM7-01LVL::ErrorMASK::ff 05/25/2010 20:09:57.871 CCM|H225D::restart0_RSVPRegisterRes, CI=24083271, branch=0|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID:: x.x.x.x CT::1,100,152,1.1IP::10.1.1.5DEV::LVL::DetailedMASK::0800 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 51, Issue 31
I would now think that the Cisco 360 is now dead Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] new site looks great
I see the web site is up... Looks very swish Great work, but FYI I am unable to log into the site :) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 3A SIP registration problem
I have two 7961 phones and I have successfully gotten one into SIP, but the other I am getting this error. The config is the same out of volume 1 lab 3A. The phone in voice pool 1 came up straight away and dl the SIP firmware but this one will not Debug tftp events and ccsip only show this Nov 3 22:19:17.194: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP0017E066C2E7.tlv Nov 3 22:19:17.330: TFTP: Looking for SEP0017E066C2E7.cnf.xml Nov 3 22:19:17.438: TFTP: Looking for XMLDefault.cnf.xml Any ideas ? Leslie ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups
I got it fixed :) You were right my attributes were not correct for the username I worked it out by going here http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb963907.aspx Cheers Leslie -Original Message- From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:25 AM To: Leslie Meade; cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups Don't think your issue is with the code. It's likely with the format of the credentials. Often when dealing with LDAP, you have to put the credentials in the form of an AD specification. Something like: DN=Administrator,CN=Users,CN=Domain,CN=com I've probably got the attributes confused (I always have to go to my notes which aren't currently available to me) to see which ones are CN and which are DN), but you get the idea. You must do it this way if you're binding LDAP in CCM 6 or 7. Cliff -- From: Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:12 PM To: cisco-v...@puck.nether.net; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups I found out how to set it up and i have struck another issue. When I do a search I get the XML Error [4]: Parse Error. I looked at the iis logs and get invalid credentials I am using the Multidirectory ASP file in the SDK from cisco. With this line dirs[0] = new Directory(XX Directory, 10.1.X.X, ou=XX group, ou=ipusers, ou=XXX, 389, cn=XXX, ou=users, ou=XXX, XXX, ); This is the IIS error, 2009-06-10 00:04:35 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp action=searchid=-1 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 200 0 0 2009-06-10 00:04:41 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp action=listid=-1f=s|180|800a0031|Invalid_credentials 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 500 0 0 Can anyone shed some light on the reason I am getting invalid credentials, I have even gone as far as using the domain admin account and I get the same Leslie
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Multidirectory ldap lookups
I found out how to set it up and i have struck another issue. When I do a search I get the XML Error [4]: Parse Error. I looked at the iis logs and get invalid credentials I am using the Multidirectory ASP file in the SDK from cisco. With this line dirs[0] = new Directory(XX Directory, 10.1.X.X, ou=XX group, ou=ipusers, ou=XXX, 389, cn=XXX, ou=users, ou=XXX, XXX, ); This is the IIS error, 2009-06-10 00:04:35 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp action=searchid=-1 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 200 0 0 2009-06-10 00:04:41 W3SVC1 172.16.1.17 GET /CiscoIPServices/directory.asp action=listid=-1f=s|180|800a0031|Invalid_credentials 80 - 172.16.1.70 Allegro-Software-WebClient/4.34 500 0 0 Can anyone shed some light on the reason I am getting invalid credentials, I have even gone as far as using the domain admin account and I get the same Leslie
