Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Corporate Directory
Add End-Users with telephone numbers.. They will show up in Corporate Directory :) On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Dharambir dharambi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi how can we configure cucm so that cisco phone displays all users directory. Sent from Samsung Mobile ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc ___ Free CCIE RS, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless Security Videos :: iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone not pick up TFTP or config from UCM
Hey Karen, Try upgrading or downgrading the phone firmware, then restart the tftp service. If it still doesn't work, try to register this phone on another call manager.. If it still doesn't register, it might be because the phone is messed up inside.. Are all the acting this way.. Which models are effected.. Regards, Shabeeb On 12 Jun 2013 22:59, Karen Johnson karen.johnson...@yahoo.ca wrote: hi all, Phones are getting the ip address and option 150 from SC router DHCP. However the phones do not show DN or extension. (only blue image background) When I checked the Network setting in phone (ip,subnet, TFTP all showing correctly) - What is the cause phone not able to pick up the DN config from UCM (in UCM show the phones registered with DN) ? - I have also restart the TFTP and UCM. - here is my diagram : phone --- switch--- SC router (DHCP) tks for help ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] switch- spanning tree portfast
If you don't give spanning tree portfast, then on reboot etc the device (phone or desktop) will take 30 seconds to boot up.. On 11 Jun 2013 20:00, singh singh8...@in.com wrote: hi Guys, Is the command spanning tree portfast required under the switch ports on a switch connected to the phone? Doesn't the switchport mode voice vlan take care of this ? Regards, singh Get Yourself a cool, short *@in.com* Email ID now!http://www3.in.com/sso/commonregister.php?ref=INutm_source=inviteutm_medium=outgoing ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)
Hey ravi, I believe it means that mgcp packets was disrupted in between transmission resulting in packet loss etc. This error implies that there is a bug in the ios. Try upgrading the ios and check Regards Shabeeb On 21 May 2013 04:28, ie ravindra ieravin...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, Whats is the real meaning of MGCP tear down. Is it means dropping a call or , What ? thanks for your valuable input. Ravi, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hyphothetical Voice Infrastructure Issue Question
Hi.. Firstly, are you using CUCM or CME?? Secondly, try using a Static IP on the IP Phone. (*try using a 79XX ip phone.. it is easier to know wat is happening*). Thirdly, try registering a phone with static IP in the same vlan as that of the Call Manager Fourthly, If your using CME, make sure the source-address comand is correct under the telephony-service commands. Fifthly, if your using a CUCM, delete the DHCP scope and recreate them and try Hope one of these works.. :) Cheers, Shabeeb On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Michael Davis michaeldavis1...@yahoo.comwrote: Scenario for campus intrasture problem: Phones are not registering. Phones are obtaining a valid IP address and have been erased to ensure they are getting a fresh IP address. Solutions investigated Verified VLAN's are correct and active Verified option 150 is correct in the DHCP options Verified Helper IP address is on was the voice vlan's when in different subnet TFTP and DHCP on CM was restarted. NTP was verified and CM DB replication is normal. Idea that not checkd: WAN Qos may have been enabled thereby causing phone registration issues. Am I on the right track? Michael Davis ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity connection 7.1 voice mail ports become unregistered
Hi, Try restarting all the services from CUC and respective services in CUCM (*all nodes in both servers*). Also check the application server. plus the licensing on CUC. Then you will have to check if there is communications from the CUC to the CUCM servers. I mean the AXL communication. you can check this while creating the ports. Regards, Shabeeb On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chrysostomos Christofi ch.christ...@logicom.net wrote: Guys ** ** Do you have any idea about this issue? ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Chrysostomos Christofi *Sent:* Παρασκευή, 16 Νοεμβρίου 2012 6:16 μμ *To:* Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com) *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity connection 7.1 voice mail ports become unregistered ** ** Hi Folks ** ** I am experiencing a very strange issue Suddenly the voice mail ports lost the registration with CUC Device name prefix is correct ** ** Before 2 hours everything was working ok ** ** Any ideas? ** ** I have reboot cucms, cuc ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Strange behavior on MGCP gateways
try restarting the ccm services.. or did you try and figure what the issue was??? On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:02 AM, ccielabrat ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed a weird thing while testing MGCP. If I call out to my pstn phone and answer the call by pressing the answer soft key , the call will disconnect after about two minutes. If I answer the call with the speaker button , it stays up forever. I'm guessing the problem is I don't have handsets on any of my phones , so when I answer with the answer softkey , the phone is off hook and sending dead air packets. Somehow , mgcp see this as an error condition after two minutes or so and kills the call. If the call is on speaker, I guess it picks up enough noise to keep the call from being considered inactive. Weird. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] problems with cucm and cu integration
when you try to access your voicemail from the ip phone, what do you get?? i mean what message does it play??? On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Zurdo Spike zurdosp...@gmail.com wrote: hi expert im having problems with the integration between CUCM and UC everything works fine but when i tried to leave a mess in the UC, the UC doesnt save the mess and then when i access to my voicemail i try to hear the mess but this doesnt appear. Voicemail ports are working. MWI is working. AXL is fine. Any ideas. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO lines !
configure 2 different line to use the 2 fxo line separately... i mean each fxo line will be under separate partition and css... On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Cisco Voip cisco_new...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all. I am using cisco 2801 with 2 fxo cards. Running CME version 7. I am using 7940 phone. Now is there anyway that when the user of 7940 press line 1, he gets FXO line 1, and when he press 2 he gets FXO line 2. Is this possible or do i need to define outside access code for both these lines ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO lines !
I believe that there are no FXO line configs in the lab.. im not sure thou.. and yes, for CME you will have to use COR.. On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 6:42 PM, bkvalent...@gmail.com bkvalent...@gmail.com wrote: CME doesn't have css/partitions... instead, use COR. Now, how exactly is this a ccie lab exam study question? There are no FXO ports on the lab exam. - Reply message - From: Shabeeb Mohammed shabeebc...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Aug 6, 2011 9:40 am Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FXO lines ! To: Cisco Voip cisco_new...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com configure 2 different line to use the 2 fxo line separately... i mean each fxo line will be under separate partition and css... On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Cisco Voip cisco_new...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi all. I am using cisco 2801 with 2 fxo cards. Running CME version 7. I am using 7940 phone. Now is there anyway that when the user of 7940 press line 1, he gets FXO line 1, and when he press 2 he gets FXO line 2. Is this possible or do i need to define outside access code for both these lines ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
im not very sure, but try doing these - a. restart the TFTP CUCM services b. remove the ip domain name command. try without this.. c. erase the complete config of the router and try again. cheers.. On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I cut and paste the router name from the sh ccm-m and the card is configured in slot 0 (aim-voice-30 (2 subunits) subunit 1 vwic-2mft-E1 0/0. After all the config is done I apply the no mgcp/mgcp command. I can see from the DNA that the dialled number is correctly routed to the MGCP gateway but a sh isdn q931 shows no output - ie the call never gets there. I aslo tried restarting the ris data collector and CM service on both pub and Sub to see if this was just mis represented in the GUI. When I reload the router the L2 isdn status goes back to TEI assigned until I remove the isdn bind-l3 from the loopback restart mgcp and then add it back in again. Here is the sh run Current configuration : 2717 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name smlab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 description br1 voice vlan encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! router eigrp 1 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/1:15 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! ntp clock-period 17207966 ntp server 10.10.100.2 ! end Here is the Sh inv NAME: 2651XM chassis, DESCR: 2651XM chassis , V, SN: FTX1012A2UU NAME: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) on Slot 0 Subslot 0, DESCR: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) PID: WIC-1T= , VID: 1.0, SN: 30895396 NAME: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 Subslot 1, DESCR: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard PID: VWIC-2MFT-E1= , VID: 1.0, SN: 33273411 NAME: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs 0, DESCR: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs PID: 59-03 , VID: 1.0, SN: JAE084503SR Here is the sh isdn stat BR1-RTR(config)#do sh isdn stat Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 %Q.931 is backhauled to CCM MANAGER 0x0003 on DSL 0. Layer 3 output may not apply ISDN Serial0/1:15 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-net5 L2 Protocol = Q.921 0x L3 Protocol(s) = CCM MANAGER 0x0003 Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 0, Ces = 1,
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Restrictions
Hey, It does not violate anything.. i like to keep it simple.. i mean, i dont like too much partitions and css.. once these start increasing, (in future) troubleshooting any issue will be a big headache.. Cheers mate.. On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.comwrote: Hi Shabeeb, Thanks for the help. Can you please let me know why Point no. 1 is invalid? Does it violate any of the requirements? Peter On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:06:36 +0530 wrote point number 2 should be enough.. On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Peter ** wrote: Hi, Suppose there is some requirement in the lab like, only certain extensions should use Call Park or Meetme feature, what will be the solution to get full marks? 1) By putting these Park numbers or Meetme number in separate partitions accessible only for the desired extensions? 2) By removing the Park or Meetme softkey from other phones 3) Both of the above. Peter Treat yourself at a restaurant, spa, resort and much more with Rediff Deal ho jaye! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle? Treat yourself at a restaurant, spa, resort and much more with *Rediff Deal ho jaye!http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=mailsignature___cmp=signaturelnk=rediffmailsignaturenewservice=deals * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
i dont perticularly remember doing this on VM.. but yes i think i have. im sorry, i dint understand what you eant by the ccm snapshots could you clarify.. On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote: have you got it registers with the CCM before on any of your VM spanshots ? i faced this issue before and it only fixed when i have reverted the ccm snapshot to older one Thanks Ash On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I cut and paste the router name from the sh ccm-m and the card is configured in slot 0 (aim-voice-30 (2 subunits) subunit 1 vwic-2mft-E1 0/0. After all the config is done I apply the no mgcp/mgcp command. I can see from the DNA that the dialled number is correctly routed to the MGCP gateway but a sh isdn q931 shows no output - ie the call never gets there. I aslo tried restarting the ris data collector and CM service on both pub and Sub to see if this was just mis represented in the GUI. When I reload the router the L2 isdn status goes back to TEI assigned until I remove the isdn bind-l3 from the loopback restart mgcp and then add it back in again. Here is the sh run Current configuration : 2717 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name smlab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 description br1 voice vlan encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! router eigrp 1 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/1:15 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! ntp clock-period 17207966 ntp server 10.10.100.2 ! end Here is the Sh inv NAME: 2651XM chassis, DESCR: 2651XM chassis , V, SN: FTX1012A2UU NAME: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) on Slot 0 Subslot 0, DESCR: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) PID: WIC-1T= , VID: 1.0, SN: 30895396 NAME: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 Subslot 1, DESCR: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard PID: VWIC-2MFT-E1= , VID: 1.0, SN: 33273411 NAME: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs 0, DESCR: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs PID: 59-03 , VID: 1.0, SN:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: MGCP Gateway reg issue (not l2 TEI or l3 bind)
The only reasons for MGCP to not register with the CUCM are - a. Hostname mismatch b. Domain Mismatch c. cucm in not binded to the serial interface.. regards shabeeb On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com wrote: have you got it registers with the CCM before on any of your VM spanshots ? i faced this issue before and it only fixed when i have reverted the ccm snapshot to older one Thanks Ash On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:35 AM, steven moran smoran...@gmail.com wrote: No matter what I do I cannot get the MGCP gateway to show as registered in CUCM 7.02. I think I have configured up the gateway in CUCM correctly. I cut and paste the router name from the sh ccm-m and the card is configured in slot 0 (aim-voice-30 (2 subunits) subunit 1 vwic-2mft-E1 0/0. After all the config is done I apply the no mgcp/mgcp command. I can see from the DNA that the dialled number is correctly routed to the MGCP gateway but a sh isdn q931 shows no output - ie the call never gets there. I aslo tried restarting the ris data collector and CM service on both pub and Sub to see if this was just mis represented in the GUI. When I reload the router the L2 isdn status goes back to TEI assigned until I remove the isdn bind-l3 from the loopback restart mgcp and then add it back in again. Here is the sh run Current configuration : 2717 bytes ! ! No configuration change since last restart ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR1-RTR ! boot-start-marker boot system flash:c2600-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-15.T14.bin boot-end-marker ! enable secret 5 $1$LaQO$FR59LroSkjvjxYkzDsZ1N/ ! no aaa new-model clock timezone AEST 9 clock summer-time AEST recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00 network-clock-participate wic 1 network-clock-select 1 E1 0/1 voice-card 0 dspfarm no local-bypass ! ip cef ! ! ! ! ip domain name smlab.com ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! isdn switch-type primary-net5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! ! ! controller E1 0/1 pri-group timeslots 1-6,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 0/2 ! ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 description management ip address ip address 10.10.110.2 255.255.255.255 ip ospf network point-to-point ! interface FastEthernet0/0 no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/0.130 description data vlan to switch encapsulation dot1Q 130 native ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 description br1 voice vlan encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.210.10 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0 snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Serial0/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable ! router eigrp 1 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary ! ip forward-protocol nd ! ! no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! ! ! ! ! control-plane ! ! ! voice-port 0/1:15 ! ccm-manager switchback immediate ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10 ccm-manager mgcp ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 10.10.210.11 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp dtmf-relay voip codec all mode out-of-band mgcp bind control source-interface Loopback0 mgcp bind media source-interface Loopback0 ! mgcp profile default ! ! ! ! ! ! gatekeeper shutdown ! ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 logging synchronous line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet line vty 5 15 exec-timeout 0 0 privilege level 15 logging synchronous no login transport preferred none transport input telnet ! ntp clock-period 17207966 ntp server 10.10.100.2 ! end Here is the Sh inv NAME: 2651XM chassis, DESCR: 2651XM chassis , V, SN: FTX1012A2UU NAME: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) on Slot 0 Subslot 0, DESCR: WAN Interface Card - Serial (1T) PID: WIC-1T= , VID: 1.0, SN: 30895396 NAME: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 Subslot 1, DESCR: Two port E1 voice interface daughtercard PID: VWIC-2MFT-E1= , VID: 1.0, SN: 33273411 NAME: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs 0, DESCR: Voice AIM with 4 DSPs PID: 59-03 ,
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feature Restrictions
point number 2 should be enough.. On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Peter peter.imman...@rediffmail.comwrote: Hi, Suppose there is some requirement in the lab like, only certain extensions should use Call Park or Meetme feature, what will be the solution to get full marks? 1) By putting these Park numbers or Meetme number in separate partitions accessible only for the desired extensions? 2) By removing the Park or Meetme softkey from other phones 3) Both of the above. Peter http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle? Treat yourself at a restaurant, spa, resort and much more with *Rediff Deal ho jaye!http://track.rediff.com/click?url=___http://dealhojaye.rediff.com?sc_cid=mailsignature___cmp=signaturelnk=rediffmailsignaturenewservice=deals * ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN call drop scenario
Thanks Santiago.. I went through the document.. there is no wrong in what i have done.. damn.. this is confusing.. :( On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: ** I have this information for you. ** ** ** ** -- *De:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *En nombre de *Shabeeb Mohammed *Enviado el:* Sábado, 09 de Julio de 2011 11:33 p.m. *Para:* **ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com** *Asunto:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN call drop scenario ** ** Dear All, ** ** Im trying to integrate CUCM 8 with the AD. I have created a user ccmseeb under Seeb*-*R E*-*Users... please see the first attached file. Now im trying to integrate with the CUCM. and no matter what ever i do, it just will not work. The * LDAP User Search Base* i have created is OU=Users,OU=R E,OU=Seeb,DC=***,DC=***,DC=*** (ive just omitted the DC details.. i assure you that it is correct) The AD is reachable from the cucm. But when i Click *Save* (under LDAP Directory), i get the following *error * Wrong LDAP User Search Base OU=Users,OU=R E,OU=Seeb,DC=***,DC=***,DC=*** while Connecting to ldap://172.16.39.21:389 please see the 2nd attached file What could be the problem.. anyone??? ** ** Also I know that this is not CCIE kind of hard, but ive been stuck with this for a while now.. ** ** Thanks Shabeeb Mohammed ** ** ** ** On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adil, ** ** Without debug h245 asn1 it's difficult to be sure, but I bet on this other rack rental they do support g729 codec on incoming dial-peer on PSTN-WAN router and thats why the call succeeds. Sent from my iPad On 7 Jul 2011, at 02:08, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote: hi experts, in ipexpert lab, i make call from HQ phone to PSTN-WAN via CUBE, when the call is answered by PSTN-WAN phone, call fails. This is due to codec mismatch and i can get 'TSC rejected' message in 'debug h245 asn1'. I have been succeful in simulating this on everytime in last 5 attempts on ipexpert lab. few days back, i used other providers lab for which i paid lot of money. i did same configuration as i do on ipexpert lab (that is create g729 region which talks to HQ and BR1 region as g729. Assign g729 region to GK device pool. Assign this device pool to GK trunk). (note: I use this trunk to make a 4 digit call to BR2 phone and when i do 'show gatekeeper call', i see 16k used. So, i know that GK trunk is definately using g729 codec.) for PSTN-WAN, i configured CUBE as well. When i make a call to PSTN-WAN when the call is answered call does not drop. I was expecting it to drop due to codec mismatch. Here is my configuration on HQ router: voice service voip all h t h gatkeeper zone local VIA http://ipexpert.comipexpert.com zone local GK http://ipexpert.comipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 using local loopback zone remote PSTN-WAN http://joblog.comjoblog.com outvia VIA zone prefix PSTN-WAN 01191* zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 0 CME zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 0 CME no shut int lo 0 ip add 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.0 h323-g v b s 10.10.110.1 h323-g v inter h323-g v id VIA ipadd 10.10.110.1 h323-g v h323-id HQ-RTR gateway dial-p voice 91 voip destination-p 01191T incoming called 01191 session target ras dtmf-r h245-al no vad On CUCM: a route pattern 9.011916737485173 partition: pt-hq-CallToIndia discard digit predot routelist: rl-gk-CallToIndia contains gk trunk calling party External number mask: On Do you guys see any problem in above config. Have you come across similar situation in non-IPexpert lab for which you have paid lot of money? If so, how did you resolve it. Thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_| adil.sha...@gmail.comadil.sha...@gmail.com . . ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN call drop scenario
Dear All, Im trying to integrate CUCM 8 with the AD. I have created a user ccmseeb under Seeb*-*R E*-*Users... please see the first attached file. Now im trying to integrate with the CUCM. and no matter what ever i do, it just will not work. The *LDAP User Search Base* i have created is OU=Users,OU=R E,OU=Seeb,DC=***,DC=***,DC=*** (ive just omitted the DC details.. i assure you that it is correct) The AD is reachable from the cucm. But when i Click *Save* (under LDAP Directory), i get the following *error* Wrong LDAP User Search Base OU=Users,OU=R E,OU=Seeb,DC=***,DC=***,DC=*** while Connecting to ldap://172.16.39.21:389 please see the 2nd attached file What could be the problem.. anyone??? Also I know that this is not CCIE kind of hard, but ive been stuck with this for a while now.. Thanks Shabeeb Mohammed On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adil, Without debug h245 asn1 it's difficult to be sure, but I bet on this other rack rental they do support g729 codec on incoming dial-peer on PSTN-WAN router and thats why the call succeeds. Sent from my iPad On 7 Jul 2011, at 02:08, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote: hi experts, in ipexpert lab, i make call from HQ phone to PSTN-WAN via CUBE, when the call is answered by PSTN-WAN phone, call fails. This is due to codec mismatch and i can get 'TSC rejected' message in 'debug h245 asn1'. I have been succeful in simulating this on everytime in last 5 attempts on ipexpert lab. few days back, i used other providers lab for which i paid lot of money. i did same configuration as i do on ipexpert lab (that is create g729 region which talks to HQ and BR1 region as g729. Assign g729 region to GK device pool. Assign this device pool to GK trunk). (note: I use this trunk to make a 4 digit call to BR2 phone and when i do 'show gatekeeper call', i see 16k used. So, i know that GK trunk is definately using g729 codec.) for PSTN-WAN, i configured CUBE as well. When i make a call to PSTN-WAN when the call is answered call does not drop. I was expecting it to drop due to codec mismatch. Here is my configuration on HQ router: voice service voip all h t h gatkeeper zone local VIA http://ipexpert.comipexpert.com zone local GK http://ipexpert.comipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 using local loopback zone remote PSTN-WAN http://joblog.comjoblog.com outvia VIA zone prefix PSTN-WAN 01191* zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 0 CME zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 0 CME no shut int lo 0 ip add 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.0 h323-g v b s 10.10.110.1 h323-g v inter h323-g v id VIA ipadd 10.10.110.1 h323-g v h323-id HQ-RTR gateway dial-p voice 91 voip destination-p 01191T incoming called 01191 session target ras dtmf-r h245-al no vad On CUCM: a route pattern 9.011916737485173 partition: pt-hq-CallToIndia discard digit predot routelist: rl-gk-CallToIndia contains gk trunk calling party External number mask: On Do you guys see any problem in above config. Have you come across similar situation in non-IPexpert lab for which you have paid lot of money? If so, how did you resolve it. Thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_| adil.sha...@gmail.comadil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comwww.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com attachment: AD structure.JPGattachment: LDAP err.JPG___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)
just make sure that the phone model is *7941 *or *7941G*.. check, try and update :) On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mxwrote: Hello I have a doubt what is reason the ip phone 7941 do not registered to cucm the status reject, I am sure the MAC and phone type in the cucm is add correctly. ** ** Thanks. ** ** ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ Phones not Registering
Hi, I faced a similar issue couple of days back.. I had configured the DHCP in my CUCM. The problem was the in the DHCP IP Schema, 1 digit went wrong, so nothing was registering. it took me nearly 2 days to figure this out.. take a closer look and you might figure out something. If this doesnt work, try removing the DHCP from the CUCM and put them in the router/switch.. while doing this dont forget the to use the option 150.. Regards Shabeeb Mohammed On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Vinay Kumar6 vinayjaisw...@in.ibm.comwrote: Hi, Facing difficulty in registering the HQ Phones to CUCM, Routing is enabled on the HQ router and Vlans are created on the switch. Phones are able to get the IP address from the CUCM (DHCP) server., Not sure what exactly to check for. Warm Regards, Vinay Kumar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call park
45[0-3] will do... we will get 4 numbers here.. On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 8:17 AM, donny f f.faraday...@gmail.com wrote: hi all, when we asked to configure park up to 4 simultaneous call. mean we will need 45[0-3] or 45[0-4] ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I just failed the LAB 5
chill dude.. my colleague had to attempt the exam 6 times before he got thru... and worst of all, no repeated questions.. just study.. yu gonna get thru soon.. if you looking for a different guide, check http://www.ievoicelab.com/ its good.. really good.. cheers mate.. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:50 PM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: Just failed the LAB 5 everybody has been talking about. I felt very prepared, but not for that test. Alot of things that IPExpert has never touched. That sucks cuz I was trying to use them solely. I feel like I'm going to have to throw down more money for a different study guide... Anywho, I was wondering what the chances are to get the same lab twice. If you take a lab, is it pretty much disqualified from you repeating it? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME Installation
Hi, All you need is the IOS supporting voice. then activate the telephony services with auto registration. Connect the phones and it should work. If you need to confire each phone via GUI, then you will need the GUI file in your flash. this is separate and it doesnt come with the IOS. There are lots of papers in cisco regarding this. Regards Shabeeb On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:20 PM, wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com wrote: Hi All, Just wondering how to do an installation of CME. I mean, I have worked on the Lab CME Routers, but to get to that level do I just need to install the IOS File or its more to it. I am trying to do a basic installation with SCCP 7965 and SIP 7965 on a GNS 3 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Kind Regards Wilson Samuel ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
