[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE

2013-02-20 Thread Michael.Sears
Greetings All.  I'm having an unusual issue with my Gatekeeper which I have not 
seen before.



My gatekeeper is on the mgcp HQ router.  When I do show gatekeeper end I only 
see GK_Trunk_1, the publisher and CME.  The Subscriber is missing.  I have 
reset the trunk and gatekeeper many times.  Although the database shows 412's 
and 2's I performed a DB repair all.  I have tried everything to get GK_Tunk_2, 
the subscriber to come up but it won't.



Anyone out there experience this issue and did you find a resolution?  If so 
please respond ASAP as my lab is in 9 days and if this happens to me in the lab 
I'd like to know what I have to do to fix it.



Any input appreciated.  Thank you.



Michael Sears


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE

2013-02-20 Thread Nicolas MICHEL

Hi Michael

Check that the device pool associated to the trunk got a Call Manager 
group with both Pub and Sub.


Beside of that I don't know

Regards

PS: Never ask to answer ASAP please :) We are like you and owe nothing 
but help if we can :)



Nic





Le Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:43:06 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
a écrit :

Greetings All.  I'm having an unusual issue with my Gatekeeper which I
have not seen before.

My gatekeeper is on the mgcp HQ router.  When I do show gatekeeper
end I only see GK_Trunk_1, the publisher and CME.  The Subscriber is
missing.  I have reset the trunk and gatekeeper many times.  Although
the database shows 412's and 2's I performed a DB repair all.  I have
tried everything to get GK_Tunk_2, the subscriber to come up but it won't.

Anyone out there experience this issue and did you find a resolution?
If so please respond ASAP as my lab is in 9 days and if this happens
to me in the lab I'd like to know what I have to do to fix it.

Any input appreciated.  Thank you.

Michael Sears



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE

2013-02-20 Thread Michael.Sears
Thank you much.  You were right on.  Somehow I set the device pool incorrectly 
I'm just upset with myself for not checking this, but thank you much was 
driving me crazy.  Hopefully, I won't make this stupid mistake in my lab 
attempt.  Oh and thanks for responding so quickly.

--ms

Michael Sears

-Original Message-
From: Nicolas MICHEL [mailto:mcl.nico...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 6:10 AM
To: Sears, Michael (msears)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GATEKEEPER ISSUE

Hi Michael

Check that the device pool associated to the trunk got a Call Manager group 
with both Pub and Sub.

Beside of that I don't know

Regards

PS: Never ask to answer ASAP please :) We are like you and owe nothing but help 
if we can :)


Nic





Le Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:43:06 PM, michael.se...@compucom.com 
a écrit :
 Greetings All.  I'm having an unusual issue with my Gatekeeper which I
 have not seen before.

 My gatekeeper is on the mgcp HQ router.  When I do show gatekeeper
 end I only see GK_Trunk_1, the publisher and CME.  The Subscriber is
 missing.  I have reset the trunk and gatekeeper many times.  Although
 the database shows 412's and 2's I performed a DB repair all.  I have
 tried everything to get GK_Tunk_2, the subscriber to come up but it won't.

 Anyone out there experience this issue and did you find a resolution?
 If so please respond ASAP as my lab is in 9 days and if this happens
 to me in the lab I'd like to know what I have to do to fix it.

 Any input appreciated.  Thank you.

 Michael Sears



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-10-16 Thread Tamer Ismail
Hello,

I know the problem cause.

1st on CUCM:

The sub was removed from callmanager group.

2nd on BR2-RTR:

This command was missing - h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.1.254.3

 

Thanks,

 

From: Amy Ryan [mailto:ar...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 4:01 PM
To: Tamer Ismail; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

 

Tamer,
 
Can you supply the following?

-sh gatek endp
-sh gatek gw-ty

Thank you,
Amy


---
Amy Ryan - CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
http://www.ipexpert.com/chat 
eFax: +1.810.454.0130 

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s)
with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities  and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/  




  _  

From: Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 01:34:00 +0200
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

Hello Experts,
 
I have problem in integrating GK with CUCM and BR2, showing below all
configuration I made for the integration.
The problem in prefix #1 the only prefix register on GW (3 is not, which
should come from BR2).
And also CUCM pub is the old server register to GK (sub is not).
 
Please check configuration and tell me, maybe I forget something.
 
HQ-RTR:
==
!
voice service voip 
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11
!
gatekeeper
 zone local PL proctorlabs.com
 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR
 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR
 no shutdown
!
BR2-RTR:
===
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id PL ipaddr 177.1.11.1 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3
!
voice service voip 
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 h323
  h225 listen-port 1820
  no call service stop
!
CUCM:
=
.Add GK

.Add Trunk

.Change service parameter with gk-trunk value.

.Change signaling port in gateway page to be 1820


Any way I think CUCM configuration should not affect Sub only to not be
register.
 
Thanks in advance,
Tamer
 
 
 
 
 
 

  _  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-10-15 Thread Amy Ryan
Tamer,
 
Can you supply the following?

-sh gatek endp
-sh gatek gw-ty

Thank you,
Amy


---
Amy Ryan ­ CCIE #24677 (Voice)
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s)
with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities  and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/




From: Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 01:34:00 +0200
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

Hello Experts,
 
I have problem in integrating GK with CUCM and BR2, showing below all
configuration I made for the integration.
The problem in prefix #1 the only prefix register on GW (3 is not, which
should come from BR2).
And also CUCM pub is the old server register to GK (sub is not).
 
Please check configuration and tell me, maybe I forget something.
 
HQ-RTR:
==
!
voice service voip 
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11
!
gatekeeper
 zone local PL proctorlabs.com
 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2
 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1
 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR
 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR
 no shutdown
!
BR2-RTR:
===
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id PL ipaddr 177.1.11.1 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3
!
voice service voip 
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 h323
  h225 listen-port 1820
  no call service stop
!
CUCM:
=
·Add GK

·Add Trunk

·Change service parameter with gk-trunk value.

·Change signaling port in gateway page to be 1820

 
Any way I think CUCM configuration should not affect Sub only to not be
register.
 
Thanks in advance,
Tamer
 
 
 
 
 
 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-10-14 Thread Tamer Ismail
Hello Experts,

 

I have problem in integrating GK with CUCM and BR2, showing below all
configuration I made for the integration.

The problem in prefix #1 the only prefix register on GW (3 is not, which
should come from BR2).

And also CUCM pub is the old server register to GK (sub is not).

 

Please check configuration and tell me, maybe I forget something.

 

HQ-RTR:

==

!

voice service voip 

 sip

  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11

  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11

!

gatekeeper

 zone local PL proctorlabs.com

 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2

 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2

 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1

 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1

 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR

 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR

 no shutdown

!

BR2-RTR:

===

!

interface Loopback0

 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255

 h323-gateway voip interface

 h323-gateway voip id PL ipaddr 177.1.11.1 1719

 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR

 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3

!

voice service voip 

 allow-connections h323 to sip

 allow-connections sip to h323

 h323

  h225 listen-port 1820

  no call service stop

!

CUCM:

=

. Add GK

. Add Trunk

. Change service parameter with gk-trunk value.

. Change signaling port in gateway page to be 1820

 

Any way I think CUCM configuration should not affect Sub only to not be
register.

 

Thanks in advance,

Tamer

 

 

 

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-05-25 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Hi everyone,

 

I am having trouble with my GK.  I have made Bold what is the problem,
but I can't seem to understand why I'm having this issue.  I configured
a tech-prefix of 1# under the Trunk configuration page.

 

 

 

 

 

Here is the config -

gatekeeper

 zone local ZONE_1 asccie.com 10.5.200.1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 10 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 9 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 0 BR2_R3_GW BR1_R2_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 10 BR2_R3_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 0 BR1_R2_GW CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2
CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 no shutdown

 

 

 

 

Here is the debug gatekeeper main 10 output:

May 25 23:55:58.011: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

May 25 23:55:58.187: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

R1(config-gk)#

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4AE0FB04,crv=0x19, answerCall=0

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_dns_query: No
Name servers

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) Matched tech-prefix 1#

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

May 25 23:56:00.115:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the source side, src_zonep=0x4AE06200

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_1, and z_invian

R1(config-gk)#amelen=0

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the destination side, dst_zonep=0x4AE06200

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_1, and z_outvianamelen=0

May 25 23:56:00.115:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) tech-prefix gateway selection failed.

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
rassrv_get_addrinfo() failed (return code = 0x103)

 

 

 

 

Here is the show gatekeeper call 10 output:

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x4AE0F9F0, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
crv=31, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x4925F3F8

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts:
NOT_FOUND

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new:
checking for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4AE0F9F0

May 26 00:02:15.899: //C6CEF7C380D2/C6CEF7C380D4/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4AB57F54

May 26 00:02:15.899: //C6CEF7C380D2/C6CEF7C380D4/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x0, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x0, c_reszp2 0x0

 

 

 

 

Here is the show gatekeeper endpoints output:

R1(config-gk)#do show gatekeeper end

GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION



CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name Type
Flags 

--- - --- - - 
- 

10.5.201.1  1720  10.5.201.1  61751 ZONE_1VOIP-GW 

H323-ID: BR1_R2_GW

Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0

10.5.202.1  1720  10.5.202.1  52635 ZONE_1VOIP-GW 

H323-ID: BR2_R3_GW

E164-ID: 3001

E164-ID: 3002

Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0

172.21.51.204   37257 172.21.51.204   32858 ZONE_1TERM

H323-ID: CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

172.21.51.205   34279 172.21.51.205   32814 ZONE_1TERM

H323-ID: CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

Total number of active registrations = 4

 

(The reason why 3001 and 3002 are registering with GK is the fact that I
am using the secondary command on CME.  For some reason that is still
letting 3001/3002 register with the GK).

 

Thanks in advance for your help!

 

 

Jeff Price
Network Consulting Engineer - Unified Communications Practice


jeffp...@cisco.com mailto:jeffp...@cisco.com 
Phone: 408-525-8293
Mobile: 408-204-4510



Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive,
San Jose, CA 95134-1706
USA
Cisco home page http://www.cisco.com/ 

 

 

 Think before you print.

 

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. 

Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended 

recipient (or authorized to receive for the 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-05-25 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
-it.net
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID: 4bfc4d65.8060...@cbi.ma
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Congratulations brother

On 05/25/2010 11:18 PM, Ehab Salem wrote:

 Dear Group,

 I Passed from the first shot Really thanks a lot for all your 
 help...I really learned a lot from this kind study list J

 All what I want to say about my experience: the exam is easier than 
 what we have in Volume 2...so it's all about Time Management, Strategy

 and Plan. I finished the lab in almost 6 hours. And spent the rest of 
 time revising my configuration.

 I spent the week before the exam practicing on time management and 
 putting a strategy and plan for each part in the exam that may 
 comeand before the exam you should sleep well to start the exam 
 with your full performance and energy.

 Anyway, it's over now for me...and wish u all the best J

 Thanks and best regards,

 * *

 *E**HAB **S**ALEM*

 Cisco Instructor | Sigma IT -- Egypt


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100525/f4b
052ec/attachment-0001.htm 

--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:25:25 +0100
From: Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I Passed CCIE#26088!!!
To: kerboute kerboute naoufal.kerbo...@cbi.ma
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID: 4bfc4e55.9060...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100525/b50
0a27a/attachment-0001.htm 

--

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:53:56 -0500
From: Jeff Price (jeffpric) jeffp...@cisco.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
To: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
b2de0afa86565c47bd3a8435550f955301068...@xmb-rcd-201.cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi everyone,

 

I am having trouble with my GK.  I have made Bold what is the problem,
but I can't seem to understand why I'm having this issue.  I configured
a tech-prefix of 1# under the Trunk configuration page.

 

 

 

 

 

Here is the config -

gatekeeper

 zone local ZONE_1 asccie.com 10.5.200.1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 10 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 9 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 0 BR2_R3_GW BR1_R2_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 10 BR2_R3_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 0 BR1_R2_GW CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2
CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 no shutdown

 

 

 

 

Here is the debug gatekeeper main 10 output:

May 25 23:55:58.011: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

May 25 23:55:58.187: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

R1(config-gk)#

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4AE0FB04,crv=0x19, answerCall=0

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_dns_query: No
Name servers

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) Matched tech-prefix 1#

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

May 25 23:56:00.115:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the source side, src_zonep=0x4AE06200

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_1, and z_invian

R1(config-gk)#amelen=0

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the destination side, dst_zonep=0x4AE06200

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_1, and z_outvianamelen=0

May 25 23:56:00.115:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) tech-prefix gateway selection failed.

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
rassrv_get_addrinfo() failed (return code = 0x103)

 

 

 

 

Here is the show gatekeeper call 10 output:

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x4AE0F9F0, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
crv=31, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x4925F3F8

May

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-05-25 Thread Tapan Gautam (tgautam)
Hi Jeff,

 

Have you tried following configuration. If not, give it a shot.

 

!

gatekeeper

 zone local ZONE_1 asccie.com 10.5.200.1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1775... gw-priority 10 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1775... gw-priority 9 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1775... gw-priority 0 BR2_R3_GW BR1_R2_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 10 BR2_R3_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 0 BR1_R2_GW CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2
CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 gw-type-prefix 1# default-technology

 no shutdown

!

 

Hope that helps,

 

Tapan

 

 

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Price
(jeffpric)
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 5:54 PM
To: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

 

Hi everyone,

 

I am having trouble with my GK.  I have made Bold what is the problem,
but I can't seem to understand why I'm having this issue.  I configured
a tech-prefix of 1# under the Trunk configuration page.

 

 

 

 

 

Here is the config -

gatekeeper

 zone local ZONE_1 asccie.com 10.5.200.1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 10 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 9 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 0 BR2_R3_GW BR1_R2_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 10 BR2_R3_GW

 zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 0 BR1_R2_GW CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2
CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 no shutdown

 

 

 

 

Here is the debug gatekeeper main 10 output:

May 25 23:55:58.011: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

May 25 23:55:58.187: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

R1(config-gk)#

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4AE0FB04,crv=0x19, answerCall=0

May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_dns_query: No
Name servers

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) Matched tech-prefix 1#

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

May 25 23:56:00.115:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the source side, src_zonep=0x4AE06200

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_1, and z_invian

R1(config-gk)#amelen=0

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the destination side, dst_zonep=0x4AE06200

May 25 23:56:00.115:
//E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_1, and z_outvianamelen=0

May 25 23:56:00.115:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(1#17752011001) tech-prefix gateway selection failed.

May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
rassrv_get_addrinfo() failed (return code = 0x103)

 

 

 

 

Here is the show gatekeeper call 10 output:

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x4AE0F9F0, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
crv=31, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x4925F3F8

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts:
NOT_FOUND

May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new:
checking for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4AE0F9F0

May 26 00:02:15.899: //C6CEF7C380D2/C6CEF7C380D4/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4AB57F54

May 26 00:02:15.899: //C6CEF7C380D2/C6CEF7C380D4/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x0, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x0, c_reszp2 0x0

 

 

 

 

Here is the show gatekeeper endpoints output:

R1(config-gk)#do show gatekeeper end

GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION



CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name Type
Flags 

--- - --- - - 
- 

10.5.201.1  1720  10.5.201.1  61751 ZONE_1VOIP-GW 

H323-ID: BR1_R2_GW

Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0

10.5.202.1  1720  10.5.202.1  52635 ZONE_1VOIP-GW 

H323-ID: BR2_R3_GW

E164-ID: 3001

E164-ID: 3002

Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0

172.21.51.204   37257 172.21.51.204   32858 ZONE_1TERM

H323-ID: CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

172.21.51.205   34279 172.21.51.205   32814 ZONE_1TERM

H323-ID: CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

Total number of active registrations = 4

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-05-25 Thread Bo Gao
Jeff,

You were using trunks as terminal.  I seem to remember that terminals can
not specify a tech prefix.  Change the type to VOIP-GW and give it a try.


Bo



On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Jeff Price (jeffpric)
jeffp...@cisco.comwrote:

  Hi everyone,



 I am having trouble with my GK.  I have made *Bold* what is the problem,
 but I can’t seem to understand why I’m having this issue.  I configured a
 tech-prefix of 1# under the Trunk configuration page.











 Here is the config –

 gatekeeper

  zone local ZONE_1 asccie.com 10.5.200.1

  zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 10 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

  zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 9 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

  zone prefix ZONE_1 1* gw-priority 0 BR2_R3_GW BR1_R2_GW

  zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 10 BR2_R3_GW

  zone prefix ZONE_1 44* gw-priority 0 BR1_R2_GW CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2
 CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

  no shutdown









 Here is the debug gatekeeper main 10 output:

 May 25 23:55:58.011: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
 (minor 0) wakeup

 May 25 23:55:58.187: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
 (minor 0) wakeup

 R1(config-gk)#

 May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
 (minor 0) wakeup

 May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
 arqp=0x4AE0FB04,crv=0x19, answerCall=0

 May 25 23:56:00.115: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ
 Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

 May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_dns_query: No Name
 servers

 May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (1#17752011001) Matched tech-prefix 1#

 May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (1#17752011001) Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

 May 25 23:56:00.115:
 ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ non-std
 ingress network = 1

 May 25 23:56:00.115:
 //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
 source side, src_zonep=0x4AE06200

 May 25 23:56:00.115:
 //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
 ZONE_1, and z_invian

 R1(config-gk)#amelen=0

 May 25 23:56:00.115:
 //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
 destination side, dst_zonep=0x4AE06200

 May 25 23:56:00.115:
 //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
 ZONE_1, and z_outvianamelen=0

 May 25 23:56:00.115:
 ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ non-std
 ingress network = 1

 May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (1#17752011001) *tech-prefix gateway selection failed*.

 May 25 23:56:00.115: //E69BDC8380B8/E69BDC8380BA/GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
 rassrv_get_addrinfo() failed (return code = 0x103)









 Here is the show gatekeeper call 10 output:

 May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new:
 src_endptp=0x4AE0F9F0, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
 crv=31, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x4925F3F8

 May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts:
 NOT_FOUND

 May 26 00:02:15.899: ////GK/gk_call_new: checking
 for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4AE0F9F0

 May 26 00:02:15.899: //C6CEF7C380D2/C6CEF7C380D4/GK/gk_call_delete:
 callp=4AB57F54

 May 26 00:02:15.899: //C6CEF7C380D2/C6CEF7C380D4/GK/gk_call_delete:
 c_callstate 0x0, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x0, c_reszp2 0x0









 Here is the show gatekeeper endpoints output:

 R1(config-gk)#do show gatekeeper end

 GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION

 

 CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port  Zone Name TypeFlags


 --- - --- - - -


 10.5.201.1  1720  10.5.201.1  61751 ZONE_1VOIP-GW

 H323-ID: BR1_R2_GW

 Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0

 10.5.202.1  1720  10.5.202.1  52635 ZONE_1VOIP-GW

 H323-ID: BR2_R3_GW

 E164-ID: 3001

 E164-ID: 3002

 Voice Capacity Max.=  Avail.=  Current.= 0

 172.21.51.204   37257 172.21.51.204   32858 ZONE_1TERM

 H323-ID: CUCM_GK_TRUNK_1

 172.21.51.205   34279 172.21.51.205   32814 ZONE_1TERM

 H323-ID: CUCM_GK_TRUNK_2

 Total number of active registrations = 4



 (The reason why 3001 and 3002 are registering with GK is the fact that I am
 using the secondary command on CME.  For some reason that is still letting
 3001/3002 register with the GK).



 Thanks in advance for your help!



 [image:
 http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/UK/images/emails/signaturetool/the_human_network_logo.jpg]

 *Jeff Price**
 Network Consulting Engineer - Unified Communications Practice*
 *
 *
 jeffp...@cisco.com
 Phone: *408-525-8293*
 Mobile: *408-204-4510*

 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-22 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Hi,

 

I have restored and begun another lab already so I am unable to supply this 
debug.  However, I realized I had the H225 Trunk was assigned to the HQ_DP, 
which used the HQ_REG, which requested G711.  Eventually G729 was negotiated, 
because that's all that the BR2 would allow.  I assigned the trunk to the 
correct DP, and the correct bandwidth was then requested.

 

Jeff

 

From: Angel Perez [mailto:gorr...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 2:17 AM
To: afat...@verizon.net; Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Cc: osl osl
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

 

Hello:
 
If the gk trunk has inbound fast start checked, the gk will ask for 128k of 
bandwith then with a BRQ message it will reduce the bw to 16k, a debug h225 
asn1 would be clarifaing.
 
Jeff: Can you provide the following debug:  deb h225 asn1
 
thx
 
 Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:48:47 -0800
 From: afat...@verizon.net
 To: jeffp...@cisco.com
 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
 
 whats the direction of call? Previous debug has bandwidth 160, which is 
 16k for g729 and this one is showing bandwidth 1280 which is 128k for 
 g711. So this call leg debug is showing is g711 is being requested somwhere.
 
 -- Mustafa
 
 
 Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:
  Here is the output of command debug gatekeeper call 10:
 
  *Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
  src_endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
  crv=61, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
  *Feb 20 03:38:14.913:
  ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
  *Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
  checking for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4ABCA7A8
  *Feb 20 03:38:14.937: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
  endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
  *Feb 20 03:38:14.937: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
  crv is DEP
  R1#
  *Feb 20 03:38:15.005: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
  endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
  *Feb 20 03:38:15.005: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
  crv is DEP
  R1#
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
  endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
  crv is SEP
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  crv is DEP
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  c_callstate 0x801, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
  0x4A696CA4
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
  callp=4A35B91C
  R1#
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
  c_callstate 0x7C01, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
  0x4A696CA4
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
  ////GK/gk_call_find_dstendpt: NOT_FOUND
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.425: ////GK/gk_call_new:
  src_endptp=0x47621FB0, dst_endptp=0x4ABFA848, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0,
  bw=1280, crv=32830, whichcrv=0x2, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0,
  ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
  ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
  *Feb 20 03:38:24.429: ////GK/gk_call_new:
  checking for default (CLI) carrier for dep endpt 0x4ABFA848
  R1#
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  endptp=0x4ABFA848, crv=32830: 
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  crv is DEP
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  c_callstate 0x800, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 1280, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4,
  c_reszp2 0x4A696CA4
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
  callp=4A57164C
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
  c_callstate 0x6C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4, c_reszp2
  0x4A696CA4
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
  R1#
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  crv is SEP
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
  c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
  0x4A696CA4
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
  callp=4A35B91C
  *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
  c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
  0x4A696CA4
 
  The gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND line is leading me to believe
  something that I was noticed on the debug gatekeeper main 10 command:
  
  //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
  Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

2010-02-19 Thread Roger Källberg
Hi Kevin,
I'm a bit off here, cause GK isn't my strongest area, but shouldn't the line 
with the default tech-prefix look like this?

gw-type-prefix 1# default-technology

IE, no * after the #

Maybe it's not it, but it's my 2 cent.

Roger Källberg
Consultant
Cygate AB
Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ


Från:  Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com]
Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28
Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

Hi Otto,

Please see my config for the GK on the PSTN below:

gatekeeper
 zone local PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.100.1.1
 zone remote HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 10.100.200.2 1719
 zone remote US ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 1719
 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 34*
 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 91*
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 10.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network broadcast
 duplex full
 speed 100
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id PSTN-WAN ipaddr 10.100.1.1 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id pstn-gw
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.100.1.1
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 no shut


It looks correct.

It just seems that it is not going on to look to for a Default Techprefix
which should then route it to the PSTN-WAN Zone.

Please note my lab is a mixture of physical and virtual devices using a
combination of GNS3 and Cisco routers.

I will move the PSTN config to a physical device today when i get to the
office just to rule out the virtual not being able to do this kind of thing.

Thanks

Kev



-Original Message-
From: o...@ipexpert.com [mailto:o...@ipexpert.com]
Sent: 19 February 2011 04:12
To: Kevin Hobson; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

Hi Kevin,

According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn
remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would
like to check your pstn wan gk configuration, would you please sent it?

Thanks,
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar

-Original Message-
From:  Kevin Hobson kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10.  After this the timer
expires on the UCM and fails to complete.

See below:

HQ-RTR

Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Matched zone prefix 91 and remainder 6745738932
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
default ingress network = 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
source side, src_zonep=0x4A1BCB50
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
US, and z_invianamelen=0
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A1BD030
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: No
tech prefix

Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
Alias not found

Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone
PSTN-WAN
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: seq_lrq 1,
use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: lrq array
index 1B, lap 4A1C37F4
Feb 18 21:53:16.106: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: sent lrq -
zonecount 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
(minor 0) wakeup
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
local zone= US, remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 67586
be_entry= 0
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
returns proxied = 0

PSTN-WAN

*Mar  1 00:10:49.991: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
(916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
*Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
(916745738932) Matched zone-prefix 91
*Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: checking
the source of the LRQ. source_endptp=0x0
*Mar  1 00:10:49.999: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: srcvia
found gkname of source zone. looking up US in zone list
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: about to
check the source side

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

2010-02-19 Thread kevin.hobson2000
Hi Roger,

Thanks for replying.

It adds the star by default when you put in the tech prefix eg 1#.

Cheers

Kev

 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se wrote: 
 Hi Kevin,
 I'm a bit off here, cause GK isn't my strongest area, but shouldn't the line 
 with the default tech-prefix look like this?
 
 gw-type-prefix 1# default-technology
 
 IE, no * after the #
 
 Maybe it's not it, but it's my 2 cent.
 
 Roger Källberg
 Consultant
 Cygate AB
 Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
 
 
 Från:  Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com]
 Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28
 Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; 
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
 Hi Otto,
 
 Please see my config for the GK on the PSTN below:
 
 gatekeeper
  zone local PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.100.1.1
  zone remote HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 10.100.200.2 1719
  zone remote US ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 1719
  zone prefix PSTN-WAN 34*
  zone prefix PSTN-WAN 91*
  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
  no shutdown
 !
 interface FastEthernet0/1
  ip address 10.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
  ip ospf network broadcast
  duplex full
  speed 100
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id PSTN-WAN ipaddr 10.100.1.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id pstn-gw
  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.100.1.1
  h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
  no shut
 
 
 It looks correct.
 
 It just seems that it is not going on to look to for a Default Techprefix
 which should then route it to the PSTN-WAN Zone.
 
 Please note my lab is a mixture of physical and virtual devices using a
 combination of GNS3 and Cisco routers.
 
 I will move the PSTN config to a physical device today when i get to the
 office just to rule out the virtual not being able to do this kind of thing.
 
 Thanks
 
 Kev
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: o...@ipexpert.com [mailto:o...@ipexpert.com]
 Sent: 19 February 2011 04:12
 To: Kevin Hobson; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
 Hi Kevin,
 
 According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn
 remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would
 like to check your pstn wan gk configuration, would you please sent it?
 
 Thanks,
 Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar
 
 -Original Message-
 From:  Kevin Hobson kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
 I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
 PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10.  After this the timer
 expires on the UCM and fails to complete.
 
 See below:
 
 HQ-RTR
 
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (916745738932) Matched zone prefix 91 and remainder 6745738932
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
 default ingress network = 1
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
 source side, src_zonep=0x4A1BCB50
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
 US, and z_invianamelen=0
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
 destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A1BD030
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
 PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: No
 tech prefix
 
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 Alias not found
 
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone
 PSTN-WAN
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: seq_lrq 1,
 use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: lrq array
 index 1B, lap 4A1C37F4
 Feb 18 21:53:16.106: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: sent lrq -
 zonecount 1
 Feb 18 21:53:16.130: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
 (minor 0) wakeup
 Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
 local zone= US, remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 67586
 be_entry= 0
 Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
 returns proxied = 0
 
 PSTN-WAN
 
 *Mar  1 00:10:49.991: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
 (916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
 *Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
 (916745738932) Matched zone-prefix 91
 *Mar  1 00:10:49.995: //

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

2010-02-19 Thread IYERK
I think I had the same problem. This is to do with the dial-peer on the 
receiving gateway.  You probably want to do a debug voip dialpeer on the 
receiving gateway to troubleshoot this.

Thanks
Kalyan



From:
kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
To:
Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se, o...@ipexpert.com 
o...@ipexpert.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date:
02/19/2010 12:02 PM
Subject:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
Sent by:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com



Hi Roger,

Thanks for replying.

It adds the star by default when you put in the tech prefix eg 1#.

Cheers

Kev

 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se wrote: 
 Hi Kevin,
 I'm a bit off here, cause GK isn't my strongest area, but shouldn't the 
line with the default tech-prefix look like this?
 
 gw-type-prefix 1# default-technology
 
 IE, no * after the #
 
 Maybe it's not it, but it's my 2 cent.
 
 Roger Källberg
 Consultant
 Cygate AB
 Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
 
 
 Från:  Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com]
 Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28
 Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
 Hi Otto,
 
 Please see my config for the GK on the PSTN below:
 
 gatekeeper
  zone local PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.100.1.1
  zone remote HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 10.100.200.2 1719
  zone remote US ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 1719
  zone prefix PSTN-WAN 34*
  zone prefix PSTN-WAN 91*
  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
  no shutdown
 !
 interface FastEthernet0/1
  ip address 10.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
  ip ospf network broadcast
  duplex full
  speed 100
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id PSTN-WAN ipaddr 10.100.1.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id pstn-gw
  h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.100.1.1
  h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
  no shut
 
 
 It looks correct.
 
 It just seems that it is not going on to look to for a Default 
Techprefix
 which should then route it to the PSTN-WAN Zone.
 
 Please note my lab is a mixture of physical and virtual devices using a
 combination of GNS3 and Cisco routers.
 
 I will move the PSTN config to a physical device today when i get to the
 office just to rule out the virtual not being able to do this kind of 
thing.
 
 Thanks
 
 Kev
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: o...@ipexpert.com [mailto:o...@ipexpert.com]
 Sent: 19 February 2011 04:12
 To: Kevin Hobson; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
 Hi Kevin,
 
 According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the 
pstn
 remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would
 like to check your pstn wan gk configuration, would you please sent it?
 
 Thanks,
 Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar
 
 -Original Message-
 From:  Kevin Hobson kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
 I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
 PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10.  After this the timer
 expires on the UCM and fails to complete.
 
 See below:
 
 HQ-RTR
 
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 (916745738932) Matched zone prefix 91 and remainder 6745738932
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
 default ingress network = 1
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check 
the
 source side, src_zonep=0x4A1BCB50
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone 
is
 US, and z_invianamelen=0
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check 
the
 destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A1BD030
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone 
is
 PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: 
No
 tech prefix
 
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
 Alias not found
 
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
 //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: 
zone
 PSTN-WAN
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: seq_lrq 1,
 use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1
 Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: lrq array
 index 1B, lap 4A1C37F4
 Feb 18 21:53:16.106: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: sent lrq -
 zonecount 1
 Feb 18

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

2010-02-19 Thread Otto Sanchez
Hi Kevin,

You are right, configuration seems to be good, just make sure the alias is
registered to the gk or that the destination number is reachable through the
pstn-gw gateway, so check your incoming dial peer and that india phone is
registered to the cme, which I suppose is your case,

Let me know after you reconfigure you equipment,

Thanks,

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:01 PM, iy...@nationwide.com wrote:


 I think I had the same problem. This is to do with the dial-peer on the
 receiving gateway.  You probably want to do a debug voip dialpeer on the
 receiving gateway to troubleshoot this.

 Thanks
 Kalyan


  From: kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com To: Roger Källberg 
 roger.kallb...@cygate.se, o...@ipexpert.com o...@ipexpert.com, 
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, 
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: 02/19/2010 12:02 PM Subject:
 Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 Sent by:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 --



 Hi Roger,

 Thanks for replying.

 It adds the star by default when you put in the tech prefix eg 1#.

 Cheers

 Kev

  Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se wrote:
  Hi Kevin,
  I'm a bit off here, cause GK isn't my strongest area, but shouldn't the
 line with the default tech-prefix look like this?
 
  gw-type-prefix 1# default-technology
 
  IE, no * after the #
 
  Maybe it's not it, but it's my 2 cent.
 
  Roger Källberg
  Consultant
  Cygate AB
  Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ
 
  
  Från:  Kevin Hobson [kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com]
  Skickat: den 19 februari 2010 07:28
  Till: o...@ipexpert.com; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
  Hi Otto,
 
  Please see my config for the GK on the PSTN below:
 
  gatekeeper
   zone local PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.100.1.1
   zone remote HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 10.100.200.2 1719
   zone remote US ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 1719
   zone prefix PSTN-WAN 34*
   zone prefix PSTN-WAN 91*
   gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
   no shutdown
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
   ip address 10.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
   ip ospf network broadcast
   duplex full
   speed 100
   h323-gateway voip interface
   h323-gateway voip id PSTN-WAN ipaddr 10.100.1.1 1719
   h323-gateway voip h323-id pstn-gw
   h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.100.1.1
   h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
   no shut
 
 
  It looks correct.
 
  It just seems that it is not going on to look to for a Default Techprefix
  which should then route it to the PSTN-WAN Zone.
 
  Please note my lab is a mixture of physical and virtual devices using a
  combination of GNS3 and Cisco routers.
 
  I will move the PSTN config to a physical device today when i get to the
  office just to rule out the virtual not being able to do this kind of
 thing.
 
  Thanks
 
  Kev
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: o...@ipexpert.com [mailto:o...@ipexpert.com o...@ipexpert.com]
  Sent: 19 February 2011 04:12
  To: Kevin Hobson; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
  ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
  Hi Kevin,
 
  According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn
  remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would
  like to check your pstn wan gk configuration, would you please sent it?
 
  Thanks,
  Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar
 
  -Original Message-
  From:  Kevin Hobson kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
  Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India
 
  I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
  PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10.  After this the timer
  expires on the UCM and fails to complete.
 
  See below:
 
  HQ-RTR
 
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
  (916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
  (916745738932) Matched zone prefix 91 and remainder 6745738932
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
  ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
  default ingress network = 1
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
  //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
 the
  source side, src_zonep=0x4A1BCB50
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
  //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
  US, and z_invianamelen=0
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
  //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
 the
  destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A1BD030
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
  //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
  PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0
  Feb 18 21:53:16.102

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Mustafa
Jeff,

Do a debug gatekeeper main 10 on the gatekeeper and check/send the 
output when you make a call. It will tell you whats happening and if 
there is a routing failure at the gatekeeper.

Also, take a look at this documentation 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/cubegk/configuration/guide/ve_book/ve_book.html
 
, it details how to configure gatekeeper with CUBE and its a good read.

-- Mustafa

Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I’m having an issue with my gatekeeper. When calling from CUCM to GK 
 to CME, the calls go through. I know this because I have shutdown the 
 T1 controller and completed the calls. However, when calling from the 
 CME to GK to CUCM, the calls do not go through. I have been analyzing 
 the debug h225 asn1 output for an answer and I’m not finding one. The 
 GK even sends an ACF, but shortly after CME sends a DRQ. I was 
 figuring either a BW or codec/h245 issue, but I haven’t configured an 
 CAC for the GK and it doesn’t seem to be a codec negotiation issue, 
 because the calls wouldn’t go through from CUCM to CME via the GK. I 
 have the Regions configured to use G729 on the CUCM side and the 
 dial-peers to use g2729r8 on CME.

 I’m attaching the RAS output. If anyone wants some more information 
 I’ll be happy to send it.

 The thing that is standing out to me the most is this in the DRQ 
 message - terminationCause releaseCompleteCauseIE : '08028090'H. The 
 only thing I found on google for it seems like it’s the standard DRQ 
 cause IE. So I’m not finding anything worthwhile.

 Any help is appreciated. Thanks a lot.

 http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/UK/images/emails/signaturetool/the_human_network_logo.jpg

   

 *Jeff Price**
 Network Consulting Engineer - Unified Communications Practice*
 *
 *
 jeffp...@cisco.com mailto:jeffp...@cisco.com
 Phone: *408-525-8293*
 Mobile: *408-204-4510*

 **

   

 *Cisco Systems, Inc.*
 170 West Tasman Drive,
 San Jose, CA 95134-1706
 USA
 Cisco home page http://www.cisco.com/

   

 http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/UK/images/emails/signaturetool/welcome_to_human_network_lo.jpg

 http://www.cisco.com/global/EMEA/brand/signature/capital/green.gifThink 
 before you print.

 This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the 
 sole use of the intended recipient.

 Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly 
 prohibited. If you are not the intended

 recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact 
 the sender by reply email and

 delete all copies of this message.

 For corporate legal information go to:
 http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

 

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
I'm looking through this as I'm sending.  I also wanted to note that I
set the Service Parameter BRQ Enable to True, because I noticed that
the DRQs were coming shortly after the BRQ were sent by the CME.  

*Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
TIMER event

*Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers

*Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers:
managed timer expired 0x47620C08 

*Feb 20 03:18:10.733: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
R1#
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4A5F7A4C,crv=0x37, answerCall=0
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393: //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/gk_dns_query: No
Name servers
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
Matched tech-prefix 1#
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the source side, src_zonep=0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_01, an
R1#d z_invianamelen=0
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is ZONE_01, and z_outvianamelen=0
*Feb 20 03:18:13.397:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1
*Feb 20 03:18:13.421: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:13.421: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4AD8C8B8,crv=0x8037, answerCall=1
*Feb 20 03:18:13.421: //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/gk_rassrv_dep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
*Feb 20 03:18:13.465: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:13.469: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
state = 0xF
*Feb 20 03:18:13.469: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
brqp=0x4A6F94A8, crv=0x8037, bandWidth=160
R1#
R1#
*Feb 20 03:18:22.781: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:22.781: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
state = 0xF
*Feb 20 03:18:22.781: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
brqp=0x4A6F94A8, crv=0x37, bandWidth=0
*Feb 20 03:18:22.785: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:22.805: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:22.805: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4AB97164,crv=0x8038, answerCall=1
*Feb 20 03:18:22.805: //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/gk_rassrv_dep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
R1#
*Feb 20 03:18:25.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
TIMER event

*Feb 20 03:18:25.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers

*Feb 20 03:18:25.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers:
managed timer expired 0x47620C08 

R1#
*Feb 20 03:18:27.825: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:27.829: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
R1#
*Feb 20 03:18:33.965: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb 20 03:18:34.381: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
R1#
*Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
TIMER event

*Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers

*Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers:
managed timer expired 0x47620C08

Thanks,

Jeff


-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:09 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

Jeff,

Do a debug gatekeeper main 10 on the gatekeeper and check/send the 
output when you make a call. It will tell you whats happening and if 
there is a routing failure at the gatekeeper.

Also, take a look at this documentation 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/voice/cubegk/configuration/guide/ve_
book/ve_book.html 
, it details how to configure gatekeeper with CUBE and its a good read.

-- Mustafa

Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I'm having an issue with my gatekeeper. When calling from CUCM to GK 
 to CME, the calls go through. I know this because I have shutdown the 
 T1 controller

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Mustafa,

Do I need a XCODER on CME?  Region is configured to use G729 and so is
the dial-peer on CME.  The call goes through successfully when calling
from CUCM to CME site, so that leads me to believe the XCODER is
necessary?  

The call never goes through.  No ringing, no busy, nothing.  As far as I
can tell, the call goes through the GK logic of trying both TRUNKS (SUB
then PUB) and then falls back to the PSTN dial-peer I've configured and
the call is completed successfully through the PSTN.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

GK seems to be routing the call. Do you get a busy tone when the call is

unsuccessful? Have you configured an xcoder anyway on CME?

-- Mustafa

Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:
 I'm looking through this as I'm sending.  I also wanted to note that I
 set the Service Parameter BRQ Enable to True, because I noticed that
 the DRQs were coming shortly after the BRQ were sent by the CME.  

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
 TIMER event

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers:
 managed timer expired 0x47620C08 

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.733: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
 arqp=0x4A5F7A4C,crv=0x37, answerCall=0
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
 ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393: //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/gk_dns_query: No
 Name servers
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
 Matched tech-prefix 1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
 Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
 non-std ingress network = 1
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to
check
 the source side, src_zonep=0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
 is ZONE_01, an
 R1#d z_invianamelen=0
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to
check
 the destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
 is ZONE_01, and z_outvianamelen=0
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.397:
 ////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
 non-std ingress network = 1
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.421: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.421: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
 arqp=0x4AD8C8B8,crv=0x8037, answerCall=1
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.421:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/gk_rassrv_dep_arq:
 ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.465: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.469: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
 state = 0xF
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.469: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
 brqp=0x4A6F94A8, crv=0x8037, bandWidth=160
 R1#
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.781: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.781: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
 state = 0xF
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.781: ////GK/gk_rassrv_brq:
 brqp=0x4A6F94A8, crv=0x37, bandWidth=0
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.785: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.805: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.805: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
 arqp=0x4AB97164,crv=0x8038, answerCall=1
 *Feb 20 03:18:22.805:
//95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/gk_rassrv_dep_arq:
 ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:25.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
 TIMER event

 *Feb 20 03:18:25.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers

 *Feb 20 03:18:25.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers:
 managed timer expired 0x47620C08 

 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:27.825: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:27.829: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:33.965: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:34.381: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
 TIMER event

 *Feb 20 03:18:40.457: //

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Here is the output of command debug gatekeeper call 10:

*Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
crv=61, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
*Feb 20 03:38:14.913:
////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
*Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
checking for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4ABCA7A8
*Feb 20 03:38:14.937: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
*Feb 20 03:38:14.937: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
crv is DEP
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:15.005: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
*Feb 20 03:38:15.005: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
crv is DEP
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
crv is SEP
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
crv is DEP
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
c_callstate 0x801,  c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4A35B91C
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x7C01, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
////GK/gk_call_find_dstendpt: NOT_FOUND
*Feb 20 03:38:24.425: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x47621FB0, dst_endptp=0x4ABFA848, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0,
bw=1280, crv=32830, whichcrv=0x2, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0,
ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
*Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
*Feb 20 03:38:24.429: ////GK/gk_call_new:
checking for default (CLI) carrier for dep endpt 0x4ABFA848
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
endptp=0x4ABFA848, crv=32830: 
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
crv is DEP
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
c_callstate 0x800,  c_resbw1 0, resbw2 1280, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4,
c_reszp2 0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4A57164C
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x6C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
crv is SEP
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0,  resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4A35B91C
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4

The gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND line is leading me to believe
something that I was noticed on the debug gatekeeper main 10 command:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
 Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

The pattern I've configured on CUCM is expecting to receive in the form
17752011001.  This output almost makes it seem like only 7752011001 is
being sent, is this correct?  I'm going to try to add another pattern
without the 1 so that I can test this.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

GK seems to be routing the call. Do you get a busy tone when the call is

unsuccessful? Have you configured an xcoder anyway on CME?

-- Mustafa

Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:
 I'm looking through this as I'm sending.  I also wanted to note that I
 set the Service Parameter BRQ Enable to True, because I noticed that
 the DRQs were coming shortly after the BRQ were sent by the CME.  

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_process: got a
 TIMER event

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457: ////GK/gk_handle_timers:
 managed timer expired 0x47620C08 

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.733: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_process:
 QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
 arqp=0x4A5F7A4C,crv=0x37, answerCall=0
 *Feb 20 03:18:13.393

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Mustafa,

So I figured out why.  CUCM was unable to find the number and that's why
it couldn't route.  The reason why CUCM could find the number is...a
stupid mistake.  I simply forgot to set the DDI to Predot.  Now this is
working.  It always the little things...

Thanks Mustafa for your help.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Price
(jeffpric)
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:38 PM
To: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

Here is the output of command debug gatekeeper call 10:

*Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0, bw=160,
crv=61, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
*Feb 20 03:38:14.913:
////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
*Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
checking for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4ABCA7A8
*Feb 20 03:38:14.937: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
*Feb 20 03:38:14.937: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
crv is DEP
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:15.005: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
*Feb 20 03:38:15.005: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
crv is DEP
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
crv is SEP
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
crv is DEP
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
c_callstate 0x801,  c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4A35B91C
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x7C01, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
////GK/gk_call_find_dstendpt: NOT_FOUND
*Feb 20 03:38:24.425: ////GK/gk_call_new:
src_endptp=0x47621FB0, dst_endptp=0x4ABFA848, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0,
bw=1280, crv=32830, whichcrv=0x2, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0,
ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
*Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
*Feb 20 03:38:24.429: ////GK/gk_call_new:
checking for default (CLI) carrier for dep endpt 0x4ABFA848
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
endptp=0x4ABFA848, crv=32830: 
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
crv is DEP
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
c_callstate 0x800,  c_resbw1 0, resbw2 1280, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4,
c_reszp2 0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4A57164C
*Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x6C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: ////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
R1#
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
crv is SEP
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0,  resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
callp=4A35B91C
*Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4, c_reszp2
0x4A696CA4

The gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND line is leading me to believe
something that I was noticed on the debug gatekeeper main 10 command:
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
 Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001

The pattern I've configured on CUCM is expecting to receive in the form
17752011001.  This output almost makes it seem like only 7752011001 is
being sent, is this correct?  I'm going to try to add another pattern
without the 1 so that I can test this.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

GK seems to be routing the call. Do you get a busy tone when the call is

unsuccessful? Have you configured an xcoder anyway on CME?

-- Mustafa

Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:
 I'm looking through this as I'm sending.  I also wanted to note that I
 set the Service Parameter BRQ Enable to True, because I noticed that
 the DRQs were coming shortly after the BRQ were sent by the CME.  

 *Feb 20 03:18:10.457

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Hi Mustafa,

The direction is from CME to CUCM.  Both are configured for G.729 and
I've confirmed a call goes through and uses G729 both ways. That's
definitely odd for the bandwidth to say that.  I don't really have an
answer, but the call is using G729 as configured.

Thanks again.

Jeff

-Original Message-
From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:49 PM
To: Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

whats the direction of call? Previous debug has bandwidth 160, which is 
16k for g729 and this one is showing bandwidth 1280 which is 128k for 
g711. So this call leg debug is showing is g711 is being requested
somwhere.

-- Mustafa


Jeff Price (jeffpric) wrote:
 Here is the output of command debug gatekeeper call 10:

 *Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
 src_endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, dst_endptp=0x0, src_pxp=0x0, dst_pxp=0x0,
bw=160,
 crv=61, whichcrv=0x1, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0, ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
 *Feb 20 03:38:14.913:
 ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
 *Feb 20 03:38:14.913: ////GK/gk_call_new:
 checking for default (CLI) carrier for sep endpt 0x4ABCA7A8
 *Feb 20 03:38:14.937: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
 endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
 *Feb 20 03:38:14.937: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
 crv is DEP
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:38:15.005: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
 endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
 *Feb 20 03:38:15.005: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
 crv is DEP
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: ////GK/gk_call_find_crv:
 endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_find_crv:
 crv is SEP
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397:
////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 endptp=0x4A6F20B0, crv=32829: 
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397:
//620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 crv is DEP
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397:
//620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 c_callstate 0x801,  c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4,
c_reszp2
 0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
 callp=4A35B91C
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.397: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
 c_callstate 0x7C01, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4,
c_reszp2
 0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
 ////GK/gk_call_find_dstendpt: NOT_FOUND
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.425: ////GK/gk_call_new:
 src_endptp=0x47621FB0, dst_endptp=0x4ABFA848, src_pxp=0x0,
dst_pxp=0x0,
 bw=1280, crv=32830, whichcrv=0x2, circuit=0x0, capacity=0x0,
 ret_callpp=0x492D8D78
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.425:
 ////GK/gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND
 *Feb 20 03:38:24.429: ////GK/gk_call_new:
 checking for default (CLI) carrier for dep endpt 0x4ABFA848
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.449:
////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 endptp=0x4ABFA848, crv=32830: 
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.449:
//620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 crv is DEP
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.449:
//620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 c_callstate 0x800,  c_resbw1 0, resbw2 1280, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4,
 c_reszp2 0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
 callp=4A57164C
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.449: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
 c_callstate 0x6C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4761C1A4,
c_reszp2
 0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.453:
////GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 endptp=0x4ABCA7A8, crv=61: 
 R1#
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.453:
//620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 crv is SEP
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.453:
//620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_clear_crv:
 c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0,  resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4,
c_reszp2
 0x4A696CA4
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
 callp=4A35B91C
 *Feb 20 03:38:29.453: //620E1FC68141/620EBBEE8143/GK/gk_call_delete:
 c_callstate 0x7C00, c_resbw1 0, resbw2 0, c_reszp1 0x4A696CA4,
c_reszp2
 0x4A696CA4

 The gk_call_find_endpts: NOT_FOUND line is leading me to believe
 something that I was noticed on the debug gatekeeper main 10 command:
   
 //95E2E82B812F/95E2E82B8131/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#17752011001)
 Matched zone prefix 1 and remainder 7752011001
 

 The pattern I've configured on CUCM is expecting to receive in the
form
 17752011001.  This output almost makes it seem like only 7752011001 is
 being sent, is this correct?  I'm going to try to add another pattern
 without the 1 so that I can test this.

 Jeff

 -Original Message-
 From: Mustafa [mailto:afat...@verizon.net] 
 Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:28 PM
 To: Jeff Price (jeffpric); CCIE Voice Maillist
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

 GK seems to be routing the call. Do you get a busy tone when the call
is

 unsuccessful? Have you configured an xcoder

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread kavi ten
Hi Jeff,

Please chk the Tech prefix on the CUCM ,
If its set to 1# , then u need to send 1 # along with the no from CME 
remove it at the GW with incoming allowed nos or use TP.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Price (jeffpric)
Hi Kavi,

 

Thanks.  I already had this configured.  I appreciate your help.  Now
the GK functionality is working like a charm.  I just forgot the Predot
DDI in the CUCM Translation Pattern.  

 

Jeff

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of kavi ten
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 8:12 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue

 

Hi Jeff,

 

Please chk the Tech prefix on the CUCM , 

If its set to 1# , then u need to send 1 # along with the no from CME 
remove it at the GW with incoming allowed nos or use TP.

 

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

2010-02-18 Thread otto
Hi Kevin,

According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn 
remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would like 
to check your pstn wan gk configuration, would you please sent it?

Thanks,
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar

-Original Message-
From:  Kevin Hobson kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10.  After this the timer
expires on the UCM and fails to complete.

See below:

HQ-RTR

Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Matched zone prefix 91 and remainder 6745738932
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
default ingress network = 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
source side, src_zonep=0x4A1BCB50
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
US, and z_invianamelen=0
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A1BD030
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: No
tech prefix

Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
Alias not found

Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone
PSTN-WAN
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: seq_lrq 1,
use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: lrq array
index 1B, lap 4A1C37F4
Feb 18 21:53:16.106: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: sent lrq -
zonecount 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
(minor 0) wakeup
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
local zone= US, remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 67586
be_entry= 0
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
returns proxied = 0

PSTN-WAN

*Mar  1 00:10:49.991: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
(916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
*Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
(916745738932) Matched zone-prefix 91
*Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: checking
the source of the LRQ. source_endptp=0x0
*Mar  1 00:10:49.999: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: srcvia
found gkname of source zone. looking up US in zone list
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: about to
check the source side, src_zonep=0x663AD438
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: matched
zone is US
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq  and
z_invianamelen=0
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: about to
check the destination side, zonep=0x663ACD4C
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:matched
zone is PSTN-WAN
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq  and
z_outvianamelen=0
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003:
////GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone=
PSTN-WAN, remote zone= US, call direction= 0, eptype= 67650 be_entry= 0
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003:
////GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0

Any assistance much appreciated.

Thanks

Kev




-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: 18 February 2010 17:00
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 48, Issue 101

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CUE in lab 11A (iy...@nationwide.com)
   2. Re: CUE in lab 11A (o...@ipexpert.com)
   3. Re: FXO Inbound w/ MGCP (Roger K?llberg)
   4. UCCX Scripting (Roger Henderson)
   5. Re: UCCX Scripting (Brian Valentine)
   6. Re: UCCX Scripting (Pulos, Greg

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

2010-02-18 Thread Kevin Hobson
Hi Otto,

Please see my config for the GK on the PSTN below:

gatekeeper
 zone local PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.100.1.1
 zone remote HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 10.100.200.2 1719
 zone remote US ipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 1719
 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 34*
 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 91*
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 ip address 10.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network broadcast
 duplex full
 speed 100
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id PSTN-WAN ipaddr 10.100.1.1 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id pstn-gw
 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.100.1.1
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 no shut


It looks correct.

It just seems that it is not going on to look to for a Default Techprefix
which should then route it to the PSTN-WAN Zone.

Please note my lab is a mixture of physical and virtual devices using a
combination of GNS3 and Cisco routers.

I will move the PSTN config to a physical device today when i get to the
office just to rule out the virtual not being able to do this kind of thing.

Thanks

Kev



-Original Message-
From: o...@ipexpert.com [mailto:o...@ipexpert.com] 
Sent: 19 February 2011 04:12
To: Kevin Hobson; ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com;
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

Hi Kevin,

According to your hq debug, the call is being properly routed to the pstn
remote zone, therefore your hq rtr configuration should be good. I would
like to check your pstn wan gk configuration, would you please sent it?

Thanks,
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar

-Original Message-
From:  Kevin Hobson kevin.hobson2...@ntlworld.com
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:00:42 
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue when calling India

I have an issue with Lab5c where when i call India it just stops on the
PSTN-WAN router at proxy on debug gatek main 10.  After this the timer
expires on the UCM and fails to complete.

See below:

HQ-RTR

Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
(916745738932) Matched zone prefix 91 and remainder 6745738932
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
default ingress network = 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
source side, src_zonep=0x4A1BCB50
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
US, and z_invianamelen=0
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A1BD030
Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: No
tech prefix

Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo:
Alias not found

Feb 18 21:53:16.102:
//005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone
PSTN-WAN
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: seq_lrq 1,
use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.102: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: lrq array
index 1B, lap 4A1C37F4
Feb 18 21:53:16.106: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/send_lrq: sent lrq -
zonecount 1
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: ////GK/gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT
(minor 0) wakeup
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
local zone= US, remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 67586
be_entry= 0
Feb 18 21:53:16.130: //005FE03F1900/005FE03F1900/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage:
returns proxied = 0

PSTN-WAN

*Mar  1 00:10:49.991: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
(916745738932) Tech-prefix match failed.
*Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:
(916745738932) Matched zone-prefix 91
*Mar  1 00:10:49.995: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: checking
the source of the LRQ. source_endptp=0x0
*Mar  1 00:10:49.999: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: srcvia
found gkname of source zone. looking up US in zone list
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: about to
check the source side, src_zonep=0x663AD438
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: matched
zone is US
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq  and
z_invianamelen=0
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq: about to
check the destination side, zonep=0x663ACD4C
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq:matched
zone is PSTN-WAN
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003: ////GK/gk_rassrv_lrq  and
z_outvianamelen=0
*Mar  1 00:10:50.003:
////GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Patel, Mrugesh
I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.

Here is the trace. Any ideas?

 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.

 

My configs

gatekeeper

 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1

 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719

 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable

 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 bandwidth remote 144

 no shutdown

 

 

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#config t

Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 0x452D4630


 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 0x452D4600


 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 0x452D4450


*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4,
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech-prefix
match failed.

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched zone
prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default
ingress network = 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is HQ-RTR,
and z_invianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix

 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found

 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone
PSTN-WAN

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: lrq array index 17, lap 46EC60CC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= HQ-RTR,
remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 133122 be_entry= 0 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 0x452D4450


 

*Feb  6 23:36:05.271: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x46E902E0, crv=0xF,
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech-prefix
match failed.

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched zone
prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default
ingress network = 1

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is HQ-RTR,
and z_invianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix

 

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found

 

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone
PSTN-WAN

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: send_lrq: lrq array index 18, lap 46EC6114

*Feb  6 23:36:05.283: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1

*Feb  6 23:36:05.283: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:05.287: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= HQ-RTR,
remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 133122 be_entry= 0 

*Feb  6 23:36:05.287: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0

*Feb  6 23:36:10.739: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:13.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:36:13.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:36:13.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 0x452D4450


 

*Feb  6 23:36:14.211: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

 

Mrugesh Patel

Berbee, a CDW Company

Network Voice Engineer

8725 West Higgins Road


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Patel, Mrugesh
Mark, 

I reverted the HQ gateway configs using the browser REVERT button and the 
loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 ip address.

Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same issue. 

 

 

From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

 

Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your local zone 
(and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK) is incorrect. I 
beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1. 

Mark Snow

Sr Technical Instructor

IPexpert, Inc.

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.

Here is the trace. Any ideas?

 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.

 

My configs

gatekeeper

 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1

 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719

 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable

 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 bandwidth remote 144

 no shutdown

 

 

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#config t

Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 
0x452D4630 

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 
0x452D4600 

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 
0x452D4450 

*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4, 
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech-prefix 
match failed.

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched zone 
prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default 
ingress network = 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the 
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is 
HQ-RTR, and z_invianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the 
destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is 
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix

 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found

 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone 
PSTN-WAN

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: lrq array index 17, lap 46EC60CC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= HQ-RTR, 
remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 133122 be_entry= 0 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 
0x452D4450 

 

*Feb  6 23:36:05.271: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x46E902E0, crv=0xF, 
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech-prefix 
match failed.

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched zone 
prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default 
ingress network = 1

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the 
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Patel, Mrugesh
I am thinking it may be something with the PSTN-WAN. I will wait for
Mark of Vik to comment though.

Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today this
just blew my confidence away.

 

From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

 

Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration
error?   gateway config is correct.

 



 

On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Mark, 

I reverted the HQ gateway configs using the browser REVERT button and
the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 http://172.9.100.1/  ip
address.

Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same
issue. 

 

 

From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

 

Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK)
is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 http://172.9.200.1/
not .100.1. 

Mark Snow

Sr Technical Instructor

IPexpert, Inc.

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.

Here is the trace. Any ideas?

 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a
busy.

 

My configs

gatekeeper

 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com http://ipexpert.com/
172.9.100.1 http://172.9.100.1/ 

 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com http://ipexpert.com/
10.9.200.2 http://10.9.200.2/  1719

 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable

 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 bandwidth remote 144

 no shutdown

 

 

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#config t

Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4630 

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4600 

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4450 

*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4,
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use
GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003)
Tech-prefix match failed.

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003)
Matched zone prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning
default ingress network = 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
HQ-RTR, and z_invianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check
the destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix

 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found

 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list:
zone PSTN-WAN

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: lrq array index 17, lap 46EC60CC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone=
HQ-RTR, remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 133122
be_entry= 0 

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied =
0

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4450 

 

*Feb  6 23:36:05.271: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Mark Snow
Hey Guys - keep in mind (if you read the PL forums you might now - and  
if not - start :) - because that is where we update you on all the new  
stuff you can do on our hardware)

- You all have access to the PSTN Router - so you can troubleshoot! :)

(you don't have it in the actual IE lab - but hey - this is study :-).

Telnet to 10.xx.200.2 and login with the password ipexpert

You ONLY have Privilege Level 1 - however - we have allowed Priv 1 to  
execute the following commands on every PSTN router:


term mon
sh debug
sh isdn status
debug isdn q931
debug ras
debug gatekeeper main 10
debug h225 asn1

Cheers,

Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
CCSI #31583
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On  
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.



On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Chad Stachowicz wrote:


Patel,


  I had the same thing happen to me with a 6608 PSTN cononection  
last week, and it was a PSTN-WAN config error... don't worry, your  
gatekeeper config is correct dude ;)


On Feb 6, 2008 5:58 PM, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:
I am thinking it may be something with the PSTN-WAN. I will wait for  
Mark of Vik to comment though.


Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today  
this just blew my confidence away.



From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue




Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN  
configuration error?   gateway config is correct.







On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Mark,

I reverted the HQ gateway configs using the browser REVERT button  
and the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 ip address.


Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same  
issue.




From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue


Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your  
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN  
GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1.


Mark Snow

Sr Technical Instructor

IPexpert, Inc.


Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Patel, Mrugesh  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.

Here is the trace. Any ideas?

 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.


My configs

gatekeeper

 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1

 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719

 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable

 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 bandwidth remote 144

 no shutdown



P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#config t

Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event


*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers


*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4630



*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4600



*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4450


*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4,  
answerCall=0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech- 
prefix match failed.


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched  
zone prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning  
default ingress network = 1


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the  
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is HQ- 
RTR, and z_invianamelen=0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the  
destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is  
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Mark Snow
Hey Chad - curious - what was the error that ended up being  
acknowledged on the PSTN router and on what pod?

Like to know to check it out on other pods as well ...


Thanks!

Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
CCSI #31583
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On  
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.



On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Chad Stachowicz wrote:


Patel,


  I had the same thing happen to me with a 6608 PSTN cononection  
last week, and it was a PSTN-WAN config error... don't worry, your  
gatekeeper config is correct dude ;)


On Feb 6, 2008 5:58 PM, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:
I am thinking it may be something with the PSTN-WAN. I will wait for  
Mark of Vik to comment though.


Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today  
this just blew my confidence away.



From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue




Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN  
configuration error?   gateway config is correct.







On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Mark,

I reverted the HQ gateway configs using the browser REVERT button  
and the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 ip address.


Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same  
issue.




From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue


Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your  
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN  
GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1.


Mark Snow

Sr Technical Instructor

IPexpert, Inc.


Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Patel, Mrugesh  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.

Here is the trace. Any ideas?

 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.


My configs

gatekeeper

 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1

 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719

 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable

 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 bandwidth remote 144

 no shutdown



P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#config t

Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event


*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers


*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4630



*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4600



*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4450


*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4,  
answerCall=0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech- 
prefix match failed.


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched  
zone prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning  
default ingress network = 1


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the  
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is HQ- 
RTR, and z_invianamelen=0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the  
destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is  
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone  
PSTN-WAN


*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: lrq array index 17, lap 46EC60CC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1

*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= HQ-RTR,  
remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 133122 be_entry= 0


*Feb  6 23:35:53.543

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Patel, Mrugesh
One  can even console to it with their proctor lab username and password
from the terminal server.

 

From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:06 PM
To: Chad Stachowicz
Cc: Patel, Mrugesh; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

 

Hey Guys - keep in mind (if you read the PL forums you might now - and
if not - start :) - because that is where we update you on all the new
stuff you can do on our hardware)

- You all have access to the PSTN Router - so you can troubleshoot! :)

 

(you don't have it in the actual IE lab - but hey - this is study :-).

 

Telnet to 10.xx.200.2 and login with the password ipexpert

 

You ONLY have Privilege Level 1 - however - we have allowed Priv 1 to
execute the following commands on every PSTN router:

 

term mon

sh debug

sh isdn status

debug isdn q931

debug ras

debug gatekeeper main 10

debug h225 asn1

 

Cheers,

 

Mark Snow

CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)

CCSI #31583

Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.309.413.4097

Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.





 

On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Chad Stachowicz wrote:





Patel,

 

 

  I had the same thing happen to me with a 6608 PSTN cononection last
week, and it was a PSTN-WAN config error... don't worry, your gatekeeper
config is correct dude ;)

On Feb 6, 2008 5:58 PM, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am thinking it may be something with the PSTN-WAN. I will wait for
Mark of Vik to comment though.

Usually I fly through this part of the gatekeeper config, but today this
just blew my confidence away.

 

From: Chad Stachowicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:56 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh 


Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

 

 

 

Patel, it matched the right zone, sure its not a PSTN-WAN configuration
error?   gateway config is correct.

 



 

On 2/6/08, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Mark, 

I reverted the HQ gateway configs using the browser REVERT button and
the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 http://172.9.100.1/  ip
address.

Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same
issue. 

 

 

From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

 

Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN GK)
is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 http://172.9.200.1/
not .100.1. 

Mark Snow

Sr Technical Instructor

IPexpert, Inc.

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Patel, Mrugesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.

Here is the trace. Any ideas?

 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a
busy.

 

My configs

gatekeeper

 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com http://ipexpert.com/
172.9.100.1 http://172.9.100.1/ 

 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com http://ipexpert.com/
10.9.200.2 http://10.9.200.2/  1719

 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable

 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable

 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology

 bandwidth remote 144

 no shutdown

 

 

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#

P19-HQ-RTR#config t

Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4630 

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4600 

 

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired
0x452D4450 

*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*

P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4,
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use
GK_AAA_PROC

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003)
Tech-prefix match failed.

*Feb  6

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

2008-02-06 Thread Mark Snow
That was the proper IP - sorry - wasn't in front of my computer before  
- try the call again this time debugging ras from the PSTN router - to  
see if you get the LCF.


I saw the debug Gatekeeper main 10 below - however I didn't see the  
results of the 'debug ras' - can you retry and include that from your  
HQ router?
Just as a (hopefully helpful) note - I often times in classes  see  
students that think the PSTN GK is rejecting their call - when in fact  
upon running a debug ras they see the LCF from the PSTN GK indicating  
that it is working properly - but find later the problem to be with  
their incoming BR2 Pots trunk (be it PRI or R2).


Cheers,


Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
CCSI #31583
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On  
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE RS  
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and  
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.



On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:10 PM, Patel, Mrugesh wrote:


Mark,
I reverted the HQ gateway configs using the browser REVERT button  
and the loopback comes up with 172.9.100.1 ip address.
Regardless, I changed my third octet and reloaded but still the same  
issue.



From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:59 PM
To: Patel, Mrugesh
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper issue

Not in front of a computer but I believe that the 3rd octet of your  
local zone (and thus where your GK is expecting a LCF from the PSTN  
GK) is incorrect. I beleive it should be 172.9.200.1 not .100.1.


Mark Snow
Sr Technical Instructor
IPexpert, Inc.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 6, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Patel, Mrugesh  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am unable to route calls to the PSTN-WAN remote gatekeeper.
Here is the trace. Any ideas?
 I place a call from HQ and it just waits and finally gives me a busy.

My configs
gatekeeper
 zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 172.9.100.1
 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.9.200.2 1719
 no zone subnet HQ-RTR default enable
 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.20/32 enable
 zone subnet HQ-RTR 10.9.200.21/32 enable
 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 bandwidth remote 144
 no shutdown


P19-HQ-RTR#
P19-HQ-RTR#
P19-HQ-RTR#
P19-HQ-RTR#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
P19-HQ-RTR(config)#gateke
P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011
*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers

*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4630


*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4600


*Feb  6 23:35:43.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4450

*
P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011*
P19-HQ-RTR(config-gk)#
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x4594C140, crv=0x4,  
answerCall=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_dns_query: No Name servers
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Tech- 
prefix match failed.
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (0113313293003) Matched  
zone prefix 011 and remainder 3313293003
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning  
default ingress network = 1
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the  
source side, src_zonep=0x46EC4160
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is HQ- 
RTR, and z_invianamelen=0
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the  
destination side, dst_zonep=0x45918198
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is  
PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone  
PSTN-WAN

*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1
*Feb  6 23:35:53.535: send_lrq: lrq array index 17, lap 46EC60CC
*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1
*Feb  6 23:35:53.539: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= HQ-RTR,  
remote zone= PSTN-WAN, call direction= 1, eptype= 133122 be_entry= 0

*Feb  6 23:35:53.543: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0
*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_process: got a TIMER event

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers

*Feb  6 23:35:58.871: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired  
0x452D4450


*Feb  6 23:36:05.271: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Feb  6 23:36:05.279: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp