Re: [ccp4bb] Improving Homology Models

2013-02-20 Thread Huiming Li
I used proteinmodelportal.org to generate homology models. It worked well for 
us.

Huiming 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Jacob Keller j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu 
wrote:

 Dear Crystallographers,
 
 it has been my experience that homology modelling programs get folds pretty 
 well, but sometimes the details are pretty obviously bad, like too-close 
 contacts. One might think that the modelling software would put in a sort of 
 polishing step, but they don't seem to. Is there any way to trick the CCP4 
 or other software to fix these things, such as by simulated annealing or 
 otherwise, I guess without any weight on the [non-existent] structure factors?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jacob
 
 -- 
 ***
 Jacob Pearson Keller, PhD
 Postdoctoral Associate
 HHMI Janelia Farms Research Campus
 email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu
 ***


[ccp4bb] Off-topic: probing hydrophobic surface with ANS

2012-05-23 Thread Huiming Li

Hi,
 
   Could someone refer me to some papers on using ANS to estimate amount of 
hydrophobic surface in a protein?  I tried the classic way by STEP 1:  
titrating my protein into 1uM ANS till saturation to get the molar fluorescence 
activity of ANS, then STEP 2: titrate ANS into protein to get amount of 
fluorescene at plateau so that I can estimate how much ANS is bound per protein 
molecule.  However, for this protein I am dealing with, I can never get the 
STEP 1 done because the fluorescence signal never saturates. It keeps going up. 
Are there other ways of getting around this?
 
Thanks,
 
Huiming Li

[ccp4bb] off topic: fluorescence polarization positive control

2012-03-07 Thread Huiming Li

Hi all,
 
  Sorry for the off topic question.  Could someone suggest a positive control 
for FP assay? I am developing this assay and would like to use it for trouble 
shooting an instrument.
 
Thanks,
 
Huiming Li
  

[ccp4bb] anomalous scatterer

2011-08-09 Thread Huiming Li

Hi All,

  I am working on a Tb binding protein on which I collected anomalous data at 
Tb edge of 1.648 A.  Each protein is designed to bind one Tb. There are two 
copies of the protein in an ASU. I have two questions. First, I am only able to 
see one copy of the protein with Tb bound, and no density on the other copy.  
Isn't this a bit surprising? Second, there is one additional peak on each 
monomer at the site where Fe is known to bind, and Fe has an edge of 1.739A. At 
1.648A, f' and f'' of Fe is only about 1/5 of Tb. Is it possible Fe also shows 
some anomalous signal at Tb edge?

Thank you,

Huiming Li, Ph.D.
Immune Disease Institute
Children's Hospital Boston
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02115
  

[ccp4bb] anomalous scatterer

2011-08-09 Thread Huiming Li

Hi All,

  I am working on a Tb binding protein on which I collected anomalous data at 
Tb edge of 1.648 A.  Each protein is designed to bind one Tb. There are two 
copies of the protein in an ASU. I have two questions. First, I am only able to 
see one copy of the protein with Tb bound, and no density on the other copy.  
Isn't this a bit surprising? Second, there is one additional peak on each 
monomer at the site where Fe is known to bind, and Fe has an edge of 1.739A. At 
1.648A, f' and f'' of Fe is only about 1/5 of Tb. Is it possible Fe also shows 
some anomalous signal at Tb edge?

Thank you,

Huiming Li, Ph.D.
Immune Disease Institute
Children's Hospital Boston
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02115
  

Re: [ccp4bb] peptide docking

2011-07-11 Thread Huiming Li

Hi,
 
  Try Autodock from Scripps. It worked beautifully for me. The docked peptide 
explained why initial attempts at crystalizing the peptide/protein complex 
failed (because of a crystal contact).  The crystal structure subsequently 
confirmed the calculated structure. My peptide is a 6-mer. 
 
 
J Mol Biol. 2004 Oct 1;342(5):1659-74
J Mol Biol. 2007 Jun 22;369(5):1296-306

 
-- Huiming Li
 



Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:18:48 -0700
From: aac...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] peptide docking
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Hi Rex,
   The protein I'm working on has a defined substrate-binding cleft. I have a 
model for the apo form but not the substrate-bound complex. I'd like to dock a 
peptide fragment of its binding partner potentailly involved in the interaction 
(~8 residues ) to this cleft. My question is what are some programs people find 
reliable for making a sensible model of a peptide ligand with the right 
stereochemistry. As I don't have much experience with peptide docking, I'd 
really appreciate people sharing their own experience : )
Thanks.


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:17 AM, REX PALMER rex.pal...@btinternet.com wrote:




Hi 
I'm sure I could help but need more details of the actual project you are 
undertaking.
 

 
Rex Palmer
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/biology/our-staff/emeritus-staff
http://rexpalmer2010.homestead.com



From: crystal aac...@gmail.com

To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Saturday, 9 July 2011, 2:09
Subject: [ccp4bb] peptide docking





Hi all,
   As I'm a newbie in peptide docking, I was wondering what programs/servers 
people would suggest for generating the peptide PDB (keeping all the proper 
stereochemistry)?
Is it possible to extract a file from the PDB database? 
All comments will be much appreciated!